Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-322-86 - 158TH STREET WIDENING (HIGHWAY 181)SO. 1587" ST. IMPROVEMENTS & SIGNAL (AT SR -181) S.158THST.&SR181 EPIC 322 -86 11A'"- CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: g(0-/ 4-3 - 3a -86 TO: EBLDG 1-171PLNG P.W. PROJECT /S e L. LOCATION iL. /sg j . S p / 2/ DATE TRANSMITTED 5 15 /?% RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 STAFF COORDINATOR ajey4adjhaJ) RESPONSE RECEIVED FIRE [TPOLICE ft l r & R FILE NO. cd) THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN Tlig PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING tO 0 CT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CA C,S$i ULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ! �� 8 ff v IWy `? ITEM COMMENT ri lrt�3. r t.. 6141 1' S T;4 /20 71). h v C/Q lb �1i c o vej " Prz eg % . �UR�AU -----1(1441()R6-' DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: CN R(o-H -j EPIC - FILE .4L ! W ,I4 ,lei .' 144 '44 BLDG IPLNG FTP.W. ['FIRE PROJECT /50 /1 L LOCATION JA /sg"j SP / 2/ [POLICE' P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/56 RESPONSE RECEIVED DATE TRANSMITTED 5/5/26) STAFF COORDINATOR 'YL.O14iah1 L2DI1CU.() THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: CN R(o-143 EPIC — FILE 1 III A...4 4 ' 144 '44 TO: [TBLOG jPLNG P.W. FTFIRE PROJECT /581+1 L POLICE P & R ir LOCATION J3. /5 Slid 18 I FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED J /5 /V% STAFF COORDINATOR Y.)1,04/1GL 64 add haij) RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/986 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE No co A 4 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 A11111 v. 'TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN Q(Q -1Q3 EPIC - 3a�-81 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: , AdAtE015 (.1/141,L6,i/Ctkv/i/J/it / ..,1 TO: F1 BLDG L (PLNG /,;'i P.W. (FIRE ; EPOLICE p77 P & R PROJECT /58� LOCATION .a I5g 1 t \A gk3 / 2/ DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORD'-I.NATQR 5/5 L Yytimt aJ) FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY '.© ,c RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. s /y186 ITEM COMMENT LOOKS GOOD...WITH MY LIMITED BLUEPRINT READING ABILITY I CAN ONLY HOPE THE PLAN INCLUDES APPROPRIATE SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN "WALK - DON'T WALK" SIGNALIZATION, PARTICULARLY IN THE EAST /WEST DIRECTION. 5/5/86 pjl DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWI,LA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAt REVIEW ROUTING FORM: CN Vo - i `t 3 EPIC — 3aa -86 FILE 1A4 A 44 44 TO: EBLOG QPLNG Q"P.W. (FIRE ET POLICE J P & R PROJECT ./52141 k� cL $M.9410-0 FILE NO. LOCATION J. /501J g S e / g i DATE TRANSMITTED 5 /5 /Vo RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/86 STAFF COORDINATOR ?)Y. -(Acc 4a 4401/ ,(,() RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT $16 F' 11 p- CYfl14 b re 7-ed DATE 5' 5-J CP COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITQF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - INFORMATION TRANSMISSION REQUEST FORM Control # 8 14-3 Permit /Fi 1 e # EPIC-34- 8(0 PROJECT . i jif. /A44,04,&V . f IQ.f il ADDRESS )d)•, kg 41`. ;d R IV 1 STAFF REVIEWER BELOW ARE COMMENTS THAT NEED TO BE TRANSMITTED TO THE APPLICANT /DEVELOPER. J�[ w m i h v 1,1)✓t0L/ 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ... ❑ CPS Tech please contact applicant /developer I contacted applicant /developer (name) on (date) ❑ Please follow -up with me on my concerns by (date) CPS FOLLOW -UP jl Contacted applicant /developer by phone in writing on (date) Distributed copy of letter to file #s: Comments Instructions: Transmit copy of completed form with any correspondence' to. staff . person and appropriate files. CITY .OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN Ro-143 EPIC - FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: /t (/yI741LA. I TO: EETBLDG 177(PLNG FTP.W. FTFIRE ETPOLICE P & R PROJECT /Sg 1 L,/ I � $ idi ,e) LOCATION kJ. /sg' S I' l ' I FILE NO. U DATE TRANSMITTED 5/5/V2 /g% RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 5/9/56 STAFF COORDINATOR /1404/(a) 4adjJWX) RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove,* solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for .heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy would be used for street and direc- tional sign lighting. Vehicles would consumm petroleum fuels. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None to our knowledge 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe...JAL toxic or hazardous materials are associated with the construction of the project except for construction vehicle fuel which may or may not be stored on -site. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Severe construction accidents are an unlikely possibility. Emergency medical service could be required and would be available 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: The construction contractor would be required to comply with all regulations regarding_ occupational health and safety. Evaluation for Agency Use Only ATTACHMENT TO PAGE 11 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise during the non -peak hours of day would result from the on -going construction activities. Large earth - movers are not required for this project, so construction noise level should be im nor. Longacres facility will operate during the day and evening in the spring, summer and fall. The- p;roj:ect..,s:hou-l.d :.no.t . i- ncrease,.the t:raffirc: NoIum%on0hews:;tr,eet,, so that the noise- level —fo -1` dWi ng construction would diminish. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not Applicable e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Light industrial a J f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light industrial & Public facilities g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not to our knowledge i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The number of construction workers would vaj- y with estimated range from 2 to 8 workers. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None tD_our kq,oleAge. j• k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None to our knowledge 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Pavement, curb cut & lane widths will be designed to accommodate "M -1" zone type loads. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposed project is a street improvement project that improves the existing South 158th Street. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The proposed project will not use or impact water, rail or air transportation. Union Pacific & BNSF Burlington Northern railroad tracks run east of site. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No new trips will be gen- erated by the proposed project. SR -181 presently handles approximately 36,000 vehicles per day and peaks between 7 -8 am and 4 -5 pm..S. 158th handles approx.6,000 vpd during racing season, peaks between 3 -4 pm weekdays. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Does not apply. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any..Not..ulicable. FLG '1 -7-2C),V,3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCN, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part 0). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Control No. i4V-A13 Epic File No. FP/C-322 -3/o Fee S10O.0O Receipt No. 112 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:,South 58 S -- e t 2. Name of applicant: Centrac Associates, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:17544 Midvale Ave. N. Suite 100. Seattle 14A 98.33 (206)542 -9474 Terry Gibson or Mike Wallace 4. Date checklist prepared: April 22, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Summer of 1986 - Install signal at intersection of SR -181 and S. 158th Street. Winter 1986 -1987 - Construct South 158th Street Improvements _Q. . .0 !1. at SR- 81 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.A future drainage system that would serve as _ new collector main that would ultimately drain into the Green River by either gravity flow or pumped by a lift station A study to evaluate the area's need for new drainage system is currently underway 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None to our knowledge 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Stormwater,System Permit Electrical Permit (State of Washington) State Flight Control Zone Permit Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit WSDOT Signal Permit Approvals: WSDOT. City_gf Tukwila 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The work i ncl es_ ns al l ati on of ful 1 y= actuaied_tr.ffis signal plus.. fining/ striping improvements at th€ intersection of SR-181_1_5. 15fith Street. A new storm runoff colleetion_system. street widening, new curt), gutter and sidewalk are inclpdedas part • 0 -- • H. • -o -• • 8th Street 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The project is located within the limits of the City_afaukaal, in the area south of SR -405 and west of Long_a.cres race track facilities. The project limits are between the_int_ersecti. ns. of SR_.81.ad Nelson. Place,_hcated_within thwest 1/4 of se.ciian_24. township. 2,.and range 4� 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Not to our knowledge TO .BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, othe Gently sloped from the west to the east. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3.1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Fill - sandy gravel, with some very sandy silts. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None to our knowledge e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 1700 CY of quality fill from an undetermined off -site location. The purpose of the fill would be to raise the grade of the street to allow for a' more functional storm drainage system to operate. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No - site has a relatively flat, stable:slooe with little plant life to be cleared. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 60 %. The site is bordered by light industrial area to the nor#n a pasture /meadow area to the south. Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion control plan was determined to be not - required. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, mobile emissions from trucks and fugitive dust from exposed soils would occur. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The light industrial area does not • include any type of activity that produces emissions or odors c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Partiulate emissions from exposed soils can be controlled through watering and /or the use of dust suppressants - No measures are proposed for the control of v..hicular emissions. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. To the_west of the site the Green River flows tn_tje nnrth into the Duwamish River. which drains into Ellio.tt_Bay Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Plans for a future storm drainage system that will drain into the Green River. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None to our knowl .eiige. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Not to our knowledge 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. See Figure 1 for location. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The ultimate storm drainage system has not been developed.- a possible al- ternative would include directing runoff from the site into the Green River, with an approximate flow of 20 CFS during a 100 -year storm. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. To date it is anticipated that ground water will not be withdrawn. The street improvements include a storm drainage system collecting all runoff from the street and sur- rounding area. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None to our knowledge. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff is S. 158th Street and from roof drains. parking lots and runoff from businesses loc.ted along S. 158th Street & Nelson Place A clued_ e drainage system with the addition Qf lift_ station will carry water tQ_the west t _the Green River. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Oils, grease, organics and other pollutants could enter ground or surface waters through runoff into existing drainage system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm . water and drainage jnprovements, oil ease traps, silt amps in catch basins 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass x pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A small amount (3600 Sq. Ft.) of pasture land will be removed. A small planter area containing small shrubs will also be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None tro our knowledge Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None, an existing planter strip_ located on the north side of S. j. h is o remain 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, Robin. sparrows mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, othe Cows. horses fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, None to our knowledge b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knnwledge c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge d. Proposed measures to 'preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Nnne to nur knnwledge Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for .heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy would be used for street and direc- tional sign lighting. Vehicles would consume petroleum fuels. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None to our knowledge 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NQ toxic or hazardous materials are associated with the construction of the project except for construction vehicle fuel which_may or may not be stored on -site. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Severe construction accidents are an unlikely possibility. Emergency medical service could be required and would be avaijable 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: The construction contractor would be required to comply with all regulations regarding occupational health and safety. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ?__Traffjc_mise is__ the predominant noise in the _axes.., Occasional noise emanates from area businesses. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. SEE ATTACHMENT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THIS PAGE. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: If necessary, several techniques can be used to mitigate construction noise: barriers, equipment modification and equipment substitution. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? South 158th Street serves as access to the Longacres race track,_to the small light in- dustrial businesses, a horse auction business and pasture area. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site is bordered on the south by pasture land, used for animal grazing. c. Describe any structures on the site. A numher of small light industrial businesses and related buildings (1 -2 story). ATTACHMENT TO PAGE 11 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise during the non -peak hours of day would result from the on -going construction activities. Large earth - movers are not required for this project, so construction noise level should be minor. Longacres facility will operate during the day and evening in the spring, summer and fall. The project should not increase the traffic volume on the street, so that the noise level following construction would diminish. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not Applicable e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Light industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light industrial & Public facilities g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not to our knowledge i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The number of construction workers would vary_Aith estimated range from 2 to 8 workers. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None tour knQwleAge J. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None to our knowledge 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Pavement, curb cut & lane widths will be designed to accommodate "M -1" zone type loads. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided,. if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None to our knowledge, b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None to our knowledge c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None to our knowledge 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 40' steel signal poles with signal mash. -arals and_ luminaires. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Longacres sign at SE corner of SR- 181 /S. 158th intersection will have to be relocated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None to our knowledge Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would_ it mainly occur? There would be an increase in light levels from roadway lighting on SR -181. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None to our knowledge d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Standard procedures would be followed to control roadway lighting and glop, such as height. selection of lamps, Aiming aml_baffling to control spread. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Lonqacres race track facilities are located at the eastern end of South 158th Street. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.. Not to our knowledge b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None to our knowledge c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. I -5, SR -405, SR -181 & Grady Way. The proposed access to existing sys- tem would not change. The proposed street improvements will be constructed on S. 158th St. and at the inter- section of SR -181 and S. 158th. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, Metro Transit serves the liite. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No additional parking spaces will constructed as part of thi sL2ro.iect and none. will be__e.l iminated Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposed project is a street improvement project that improves the existing South 158th Street. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The proposed project will not use or impact water, rail or air - transportation. Union Pacific & Burlington Northern railroad tracks run east of site. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No new trips will be gen- erated by the proposed project. SR -181 presently handles approximately 36,000 vehicles per day and peaks between 7-8 am and 4 -5 pm..S. 158th handles approx.6,000 vpd during racing season, peaks between 3 -4 pm weekdays. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Does not apply. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.. Not s.p_pl i cabl e _ 16. Utilities a. circle utilities currently available at the site: electricit natural gas, { (refuse service Telephone sanitar sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. A closed drainage system with a lift station shall be constructed. Manholes, catch basins. detention tanks and oil /water separators are to be installed C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand, that the lead agency is relying on them to make its d c' i.on. Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only Vast Pod Port Blakey 1011 , e '� �O sI 74. w ay b �.aMI t SW* Hela 0 Ewe ' NAvM cg_ Park women • 8 South Bead i► 1 tam «!� .- - — — " ' ii els • ♦ Elliott Bay Art � In'!'I� ' e. 7 11 1.11. w3S1Sq ►o1 FLOATING rR t twat PM • hu!st La.1 s T. Boa G. 1NTN ST. OCA 10 Gras firm sa a« Stem PM 'overly Boy • Woodmont Beath . Redondo Buena elaide .0 a • 31TTN BT Browns Pt. Milton (S7) CENTRAC Associates -• TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. Now would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: 4- • Evaluation for Agency Use Unly 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or, requirements for the protection of the environment. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -"TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL. SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT ANO NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checkli ;t. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objectivets) of the proposal? To 1mPirLau R TIlE Ronn (0,40111 wft u�0701/ 17A0 1 O t AAY It�N5V t IiAI NNW _ AL5 u Tb Plltw t h 4-1 Lt N +s • P- rt(O w /Lt9 N (4) snip* AM ?:l� 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? No kvp. ?fit cars i3 cock' N4,. RAN iv) 1■ 4-I( cH iN cr00-r(71l T flmfm,v 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: i\ 3 `11- QC_(CI RU(t'Q voT W4 f3 l? c—erY1im ErI) Sl 12,-(\ l-t ! D I M PO.0V€TYI I ■4 fS �Ll- �CyV1lMtTim Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? N° Proposed measures to avoid are: - 71c/Wfoas L T? Renisr� rtll -FFiG 1N-rt. /l1 F[,17i I C or reduce the conflict(s) is pkt Uf a() CQ) F-11 C IT14. ' 7 /1 bar .LA RL -o(J(J ns ilk Pons i ,0 " iqukt w ( LL �N is - a�sTfLtk c��C a� 7P La��cl cam' Olz o7 (L + s . (S r2-6A. A V 0A Co ,.