Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-327-86 - PUROLATOR COURIER CORPORATION - GATWAY CORPORATE CENTER BUILDINGPUROLATOR COURIER CORPORATION GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE 12698 GATEWAY DRIVE EPIC 327 -86 ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director • • STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000 June 20, 1986 Mr. Brad Collins City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Collins: .H2E1'fl JUN z 1986 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. We received a determination of nonsignificance (DNS) for the construction of a 28,250 square foot processing center by Purolator Curier Corporation. Although there is no comment period for this DNS, we note that the project is in the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle sewer service area and we have the following concerns. Please be advised that a hookup ban may be imposed on the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) on August 1, 1986, if planning for secondary treatment is not completed by July 31, 1986. The hookup ban, if imposed, would apply to the entire Metro service area. This means that there is a pos- sibility that sewer service may not be available for the pro- posed project. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Robert Sylvester of the Northwest Regional Office at (206) 885 -1900. Sincerely, Barbara J.titchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Marlene Wylie, NWRO AFFIAVIT OF DISTRIIUTION I, 160thity0 G hereby declare that: • Notice of Public Hearing J Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q 'Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet IE" Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action O Official Notice O Notice of Application for 0 Other Shoreline Management Permit [[ Shoreline Management Permit [[ Other . was mailed to each of the following addresses on 1 1 , 198. wovJ, rryu ,d7t-cec dy4. OS Ece c SEP#\ 4),tA,u4 i,tr i) MS PV�� 6 Wa. 98So4 (ccttwcuJ ten p. Cii,) gocou,t,r/u Name of Project ri�� a. itmou Signature File Number CM-g kq(F plc -327-80 AfVuCaO' CICLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW M,NGS ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Federal Agencies ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (Region X) State Agencies ( ) WA.ST. OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) WA.ST. TRANSPORTATION DEPT. ( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF FISHERIES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) WA.ST. PLANNING & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AGENCY ( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES ( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISI( p4S44A.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION A.ST. DEPT. OF GAME ( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL County Agencies ( ) K.C. DEPT. OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVEL. ( ) FIRE DISTRICT 18 ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) K.C. HEALTH DEPARTMENT ( ) SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS ( ) WATER DISTRICT 75 ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) GROUP W CABLE ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( ) TUKWILA BOARD uF ADJUSTMENT ( ) TUKWILA MAYOR ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) Public Works ( ) Parks and Recreation ( ) Police ( ) Fire ( ) Finance ( ) Planning /Building ( )FIRE DISTRICT 1 ( )FIRE DISTRICT 24 ( )K.C. BLDG & LAND DEVEL.DIV. -SEPA INFO CNTR Schools /Libraries ( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY Utilities ( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ( )VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( )WATER DISTRICT 20 ( )WATER DISTRICT 25 ( )WATER DISTRICT 125 ( )UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD City Agencies ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION ( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) Edgar Bauch ( ) Marilyn Stoknes ( ) Joe Duffie ( ) Mabel Harris ( ) Charlie Simpson ( ) Doris Phelps ( ) Wendy Morgan Other Local Agencies ( ) PUGET SOUND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT (PSCOG) ( ) PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) TUKWILA /SEA TAC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Media ( ) DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( ) RENTUN RECORD CHRONICLE ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIVISION ( )HIGHLINE TIMES ( )SEATTLE TIMES WAC 197 -11 -970 • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Conditional Use Permit for Purolator Courier Proponent ' Purolator Courier Corporation Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 12698 Gateway Drive Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 327 -86 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Di There is no comment period for this DNS [[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date — to — Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS • Kidder Mathews Segner inc. Commercial • Industrial Realtors 550 South Michigan Street Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 -7050 June 9, 1986 Moira Bradshaw CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 L E) JUN 9 1986 CITY OF fiUKW;LA PLANNING DEPT. Re: Conditional Use Permit - Purolator Courier Corp. Dear Ms. Bradshaw, The site plan detailing Purolator's proposed location in the Gateway Corporate Center, Building. 2, as well as their office area will be delivered to you today by McKenzie Saito Architects. At your request, I contacted Kevin Griffin, Manager of the Seattle Purolator Courier Corp. to obtain additional information on Purolator's operation. Per Mr. Griffin, this facility would be used as a distribution point and sorting area of small air - express packages and letters. They employ approximately 100 employees. They receive their parcels at 8 :00 p.m. via a semi which unloads and leaves at approximately 10:00 p.m. Six people remain on site and sort the parcels —until 12 :00 midnight. Their Econoline vans (approximately,.50) are loaded in the morning and all the vehicles leave by 10:00 a.m. and— r -eturn between 3:00 and 6:00 p.m. Additionally they use (-fouj -step vans and occasionally will lease additional Econoline van's from Hertz. Purolator's primary business hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The vans will be parked at the site overnight. During working hours they will have approximately 40 -50 employees parking on the site. If you need •dditional information, please let me know. Since atrici PL: pla Ate/ Lovea cc: Kevin Griffin Joe Cusenza NBY\ NATIONWIDE AFFILIATES Offices: Downtown Seattle South Seattle Bellevue INDIVIDUAL MEMBERSHIPS SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL REALTORS -- CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN - - I(q - EPIC - 3.27— g(, FILE $(0- 621--C,U-P ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: lgiENBLOG11 PLNG 0 P.W. 0 FIRE 0 POLICE [� P & R PROJECT Pu.' a Culp . LOCATION 1 atocts GolLund il .LLLJ) FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 5 /a$f g C REFSPONSE_REQUESTED 'BY 6/tHe it STAFF COORDINATOR 1M • 61 ado PI 0.40 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY %�.f�•2 �� C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • RECEIVED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM MAY 2 8 1986 TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM ?'IR1IC wnpxg TO: Q BLDG 0 PLNG L.n, -P:W F1 FIRE 0 POLICE (] P & R PROJECT P,(/,4,ta i, eStalidt, c4419 LOCATION Jatoqg 60J.W i £ Law FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 1/45-4g/g6 '.RESPONSE_REQUESTED BY -6/4186 Q STAFF COORDINATOR 111 . ado / I ay.) RESPONSE RECEIVED CN- 8(2 -I(oq EPIC - 3X-7- 8(, FILE 8C0- ,4-GUP THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED RMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMME Ta of ,cc P N / '01) i- D IZL1 D&T le N4D V DATE 6767 D A T s COMMENTS PREPARED B C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN - (q EPIC - 3a-1- g('v FILE S1 - 24 -GUP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG P.W. Q FIRE n POLICE (--1 _Pb R4 PROJECT pug, %.I a C{9- p . LOCATION f a (oqg GO WOj O4 ,LL) FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 6-4g/g6 STAFF COORDINATOR 111 6(C( J1CL J RESPONSE RECEIVED ' RESPONSE - REQUESTED- BY 6/446 11 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART - MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT erp DATE /a(r< COMMENTS PREPARED BY A/ C.P.S. Form 11 'CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 4 CN - 8(0- ( I EPIC - 3a7- $(, FILE 8(�,-a'E CUP ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG Q P.W. fF T FIREI 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT Pw,&Lai c . . LOCATION latoqg ('j QasIvai Othu) FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED ,510?$ /Q 'RESPONSE- REQUESTED ' `6A 4186�'_ 4 STAFF COORDINATOR %M • adA BUJ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION., THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT �,1.7,QC/ DATE , 2.. g • 6 COMMENTS PREPARED BY )1.1j-- C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN - St, _Hoc, EPIC - 3a-7— g(, FILE 86- a'' -GUp ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG [Q PLNG 3 Q P.W. Q FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT Pu u .I a2&t, LOCATION iatogg CjQ tLw J2J4Jt FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED •5 /0?gig t-RESPONSUREQUESTED BY- ! -6 41$6 1 STAFF COORDINATOR %M & aco % ct u) RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT "1 "Ic-oliari loo viekits didiimdA4 DATE 5 - 3 -Q c COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. electrical and natural gas for lighting and heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulated glass insulated ceilings, gas efficient warehouse heating. orientation of building. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All lighting within the business park conforms to all applicable government regulations. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Jogging and walking trail b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: _lh e business park will contain a jwming trail ringing the park. Evaluation for Agency Use Only owl"' d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). P P osals vehicle requirement will be adequately served by existing and planned traffic routes within the park, as well as roads that service the park. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Traffic will occur at non -peak hours and will not interfere with other users in the development. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2 G�� • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Conl No. CM- 81.0- 1109 Epic File No. EPIC- 3Q7 -86 Fee 5100.00 Receipt No. /S8 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER 2. Name of applicant: PUROLATOR COURIER CORPORATION 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kevin Griffin 1000 S. Weller Street Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 325 -5400 4. Date checklist prepared: May 21, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Proposed occupancy - September 1, 1986 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. An environmental checklist was prepared in conjunction with the development of the Gateway Corporate Center. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. A Building Permit to complete tenant improvements will be obtained as well as a Certificate of Occupancy. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized 'nere. The project con -sists of a 28,250 square foot processing center in tie Gateway Corporate Center. The premises will contain office space and warehouse space which will be used to process and distribute air freight packages. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 12698 Gateway Drive, Tukwila, Washington 98168 Section 15, Township 23, Range 4, King County 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. * TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI• d. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, of er • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% 2 %, excluding river bank c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silt and sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The Gateway Corporate Center will ultimately have approximately 79% impervious surfaces. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The development construction includes drainage ditching and sediment control ponds. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Vehicle emissions will be emitted from the courier vehicles entering and exiting the business park. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Duwamish River. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.No • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm_ water from roofs and parking area will he collected in pipes and discharged into the Duwamish .iyer. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: City approved storm water detention facilities have been installed to reduce peak runoff. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The business park is extensively landscaped. See attached plans__ 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. electrical and natural gas for lighting and heating.. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulated glass insulated ceilings, gas efficient warehouse heating, orientation of building. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ffjz_LaiL- equipment noises from other uses within the business park. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial /commercial uses truck terminal (Time D �Z b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Pasture land. c. Describe any structures on the site. two office/ warehouse buildings - approximately 122,001 square feet total. The buildings are of concrete tilt up construction. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No' e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M -1 f. What . is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline area near Duwamish River. g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The 200' shoreline area of the Gateway projgct has been so classified. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 30 - 40 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? . None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed use_is consi scent with other business operations within the_.. business park. The proposed use is cnnsistPnt:,_with the future develo.ment . • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 30 ft. concrete tilt up construction with painted surface. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The business park is heayuily landscaped, buildings are sited to screen the majority of truck loading areas from street view. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would, it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All lighting within the business park conforms to all applicable government regulations. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Jogging and walking trail b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:. -P business park will contain a jging trail ringing the park. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 1-5, SR -599, Interurban Avenue, Gateway Drive, all serve the business park. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro serves Interurban Ave. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? One stall per 320 square feet of building area. None. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposals vehicle requirement will be adequately served by existing and pplanned traffic routes within the park, as well as roads that service the park. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Traffic will occur at non -peak hours and will not interfere with other users in the development. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity;, natural Cefuse serviZ'e —, (te1ep1one;,Csanitary se septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Power (Puget Power), Phone (Pac.N.W.Bell). Water (City of Tukwila), Sewer (City of Tukwila), Gas (Washington Natural Gas). C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature:. Date Submitted: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI•T Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Vehicular traffic is within the projected volumes expected for the development. Additional noise is negligible. No toxic or hazardous substances are associated with the proposed use. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Increased traffic volume should be easily accommodated by the existing street. Development of roads within the park will accommodate traffic volumes in the park. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? The use is consistent with the master use plan for the area. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: None. • Evaluation for Agency Use Wily 3.. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No extraordinary energy loads will be required by the project. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: The building housing the use is energy efficient and conforms to applicable building standards. 4. How would the .proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The project is outside the shoreline area of the Duwamish River. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No impact. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Not applicable How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Not applicable 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Any increase in demand is within that projected for users in the development. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No extraordinary measures are projected. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None anticipated • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not applicable Evaluation for Agency Use Only •.TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIAlk • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To obtain a CUP for the placement of a small package courier within the Gateway Corporate Center. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? None 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not applicable. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not applirablP -23- • OviI BUILDING # 1 FLOOR PLAN north I, 50o . /.••:,. -•. 37 ucvre_ -riee)F KEYNOTES III [WM I. SKI Of SASS I. SINS ttttt SISSI NU S. lllll OM. If. tttttt log Of ttttt LEGEND OSUMS ..., 0.11 p.[ ..[„ 4 Q J oa zcc 00 Jo � J CO LL • • A•2 • ■■ • ME EOM ME 0 BUILDING #2 FLOOR PLAN 1I11•:1• -O• 61 \--75.5 S7 owre_ • KEYNOTES — t. CM7711VM 7. LIMrar.Ywt r ma I, 210•1112 MUM. It. (177132121 M221, • LEGEND p, YtffY 0 COMM YI. tlYl 141222 M.1170127 /7•77 4Y • A-9 ny -d x.d Iri-d c°.t v v" v O App A 1 0 fi 0 o. O a © ® v� • 1 1 VJ\ O 1 I ° AU N- - t, o • tad 0 O - I \ ,...G" 1 cvo• , cs0 ,old dd ea*. - ,'d `J.f"J xse tsv w a' sre so d ' BUILDING #2 FLOOR PLAN 1I11•:1• -O• 61 \--75.5 S7 owre_ • KEYNOTES — t. CM7711VM 7. LIMrar.Ywt r ma I, 210•1112 MUM. It. (177132121 M221, • LEGEND p, YtffY 0 COMM YI. tlYl 141222 M.1170127 /7•77 4Y • A-9