Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-328-86 - WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES - MOODY BLOOMQUIST BUILDINGMOODY BLOOMQUIST OFFICE BUILDING WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES 13955 INTERURBAN AVE. EPIC 328 -86 Fie) ; ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director • • STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000 July 3, 1986 Mr. Brad Collins City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Collins: CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. We received the determination of nonsignificance (DNS) for the Moody Bloomquist;Office Building by Western Pacific Proper- ties. Although there is no comment period on this DNS, we note that this project is in the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle sewer service area and we have the following concern. Please be advised that a hookup ban may be imposed on the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) on August 1, 1986, if planning for secondary treatment is not completed by July 31, 1986. The hookup ban, if imposed, would apply to the entire Metro service area. This means that there is a pos- sibility that sewer service may not be available for the pro- posed project. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Robert Sylvester of the Northwest Regional Office at (206) 885 -1900. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Marlene Wylie, NWRO A FFIPDAV IT OF D ISTRI'"BUT I0N Kathryn A. Stetson (J Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting [� Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [� Board of'Appeals Agenda Packet [[Planning Commission Agenda Packet El Short Subdivision Agenda Packet • Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [[ Shoreline Management Permit hereby declare that: Da Determination of Nonsignificance [j Mitigated Determination of Non- significance [] Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [l Notice of Action [] Official Notice [[ Other [[ Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section SEPA Division MS PV -11 Olympia, WA 98504 Name of Project Moody Bloomquist File Number CN -86 -166 (EPIC 328 -86) June 25, , 1986. WAC 197 -11 -970 Description of Proposal • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Moody Bloomquist Office Building approximately 9800 square feet Proponent Western Pacific Properties Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 80- 36 -SS, 13955 Interurban Avenue Lot 2 Tukwila Short Plat Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 328 -86 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [[X There is no comment period for this DNS Q This DNS is issued'under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date lam, -ztt— Signature 65-62`1,--/ You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS OCKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IILINGS ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Federal Agencies ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (Region X) State Agencies ) WA.ST. OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ) WA.ST. TRANSPORTATION DEPT. ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF FISHERIES ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ) WA.ST. PLANNING & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AGENCY ( )WA.ST. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISIC 642.ST. .ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION ( )WA.ST. DEPT. OF GAME ( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL County Agencies ) K.C. DEPT. OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVEL. ) FIRE DISTRICT 18 BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD K.C. HEALTH DEPARTMENT ( ) SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )`TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS ( ) WATER DISTRICT 75 ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( • ) GROUP W CABLE ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( ) TUKWILA BOARD uF ADJUSTMENT ( ) TUKWILA MAYOR ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) Public Works ( ) Parks and Recreation ( ) Police ( ) Fire ( ) Finance ( ) Planning /Building ( )FIRE DISTRICT 1 ( )FIRE DISTRICT 24 ( )K.C. BLDG & LAND DEVEL.DIV. -SEPA INFO CNTR Schools /Libraries ( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY Utilities ( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ( )VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( )WATER DISTRICT 20 ( )WATER DISTRICT 25 ( )WATER DISTRICT 125 ( )UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD City Agencies ( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION ( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) Edgar Bauch ( ) Marilyn Stoknes ( ) Joe Duffie ( ) Mabel Harris ( ) Charlie Simpson ( ) Doris Phelps ( ) Wendy Morgan Other Local Agencies PUGET SOUND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT (PSCOG) ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIVISION ) PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ) TUKWILA /SEA TAC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Media ( ) DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( ) RENTON RECORD CHRONICLE ( )HIGHLINE TIMES ( )SEATTLE TIMES WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Commercial Brokerage Company 14 June 1986 Moira Bradshaw Department of Planning City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Moody Bloomquist Building,86 -25 -DR Dear Ms. Bradshaw: Ofil JUN 16 1986 Cl�'Y U PLANNING DEPT. This letter responds to comments received on the environmental review for the project. As I understand it, more clarification of the access issue is necessary to allow us to present the project at the June 26 BAR hearing. Access is proposed from Interurban Avenue South. The revised site plan shows existing parking, curbcuts and walks on adja- cent properties. The properties were short platted with,a 22 foot easement to lot 1 through lot 4 in accordance with current standards to allow access to lot 1 for future development. As you know the Sperry and Fewel Buildings are built with direct access to Interurban Avenue South, and access to lot 1 is through the entry and parking areas for these buildings. The entryway to lot 1 is entirely on the Sperry Building lot as shown in the attached as built survey by J.R. Ewing. In fact part of the Fewel Building curb encroaches on the Sperry lot as does the southwestern most landscaping - strip. Secondary access is proposed from 57th Avenue South through the Flexi -V development. A reciprocal easement for parking and access is in preparation. A draft is attached. Please let me know if more information is needed for SEPA review prior to the BAR hearing June 26. Judith G. Stoloff 3da- -rases -; - Roo enclosures13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle, Washington 98168 • (206) 241 -1616 i3 IJ - [JUN 16 1986 LCITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Land Surveyor's Certificate: This short plat correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate state statute and has been properly staked in.accordance with the e..1,Aivision Code. Map on File in Vault Direction: Pacific shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of the parking area which is designated on Attachment A hereto. Once Moody has completed construction of any additional parking on the Moody property, the maintenance and upkeep costs for all the parking areas shall be borne equally between Moody and Western Pacific. 4. Covenants Running with Land. The easements hereby granted, the restrictions hereby imposed, and.the agreements herein contained shall be easements, restrictions and covenants running with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, including, but without limitation, all subsequent owners of the premises within the herein described properties and all persons claiming under them. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this agreement the day and date first above written. AM W111 [JUN 16 1986 CITY OF TUKvViLA PLANNING DEPT. sg12.15 DONALD A. MOODY NANCY MOODY STEVEN M. HARRIS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein t=e parties covenant and agree for themselves, and contained, their heirs, successors and assigns, as follows: 1. Ease -.ant to [Moody: Western Pacific grants to Moody an easement fcr the purpose of constructing, repairing and maintaining an entryway and parking area as indicated on the site plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment A, the cost of construction of the parking area and entryway to be borne by Moody. Moody grants to Western Pacific and all tenants and licensees of the Western Pacific property, or any part thereof, and their business invitees, licensees and employees, the right to use the entryway, free of charge, for ingress and egress to the Western Pacific property. 2. Mutual Parking Easement. Moody and all tenants and licensees of the Moody property, or any part thereof, and their business invitees, licensees and employees, shall have the right to use, free of charge, the parking area constructed by Western Pacific (which expression as used herein includes entrances, exits, driveways and-.walks) in common with Western Pacific. All tenants and licensees of the property owned by Western Pacific, or any part thereof, and their business invitees, licensees and ployees shall have the right to use, free of charge, any EE1 co ~arking areas constructed by Moody (which expression as used r� ? o ,2. CD erein includes entrances, exits, driveways and walks . ilaD .-4 LL z alD = o z [°2 o a 3. Maintenance of Parking Areas. Until Moody has completed _ Western "construction of a parking area on the Moody property, sg12.15 RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT D [JUN 16 i986 CITY OF TUKvViLA PLANNING DEPT. Agreement made this day of June 1986, between DONALD A. MOODY and NANCY MOODY, husband and wife, STEVEN M. HARRIS and BENITA HARRIS, husband and wife, and JOHN F. BLOOMQUIST and JANICE S. BLOOMQUIST, husband and wife, all as tenants in common ( "Moody ") and WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC., a` Washington Corporation, ( "Western Pacific "), hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as "the parties ". WHEREAS, Moody is the owner of the following described property: Lot 1 of Short Plat No. 80- 36 -SS, File No. 8102020582, situate in King County, Washinaton, AND Western Pacific is the owner of the following described property: That portion of Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in Block 3 AND of Lot 10 in Block 8, AND of vacated 57th Avenue South, ALL in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, on page 24, records of King County, described as follows: Beainning at a point on the South line of Lot 4 °in said Block 3, which is South 89 00'12" East along said South line 33 feet from the Southwest corner thereof; THENCE South 89 °00'12" East along said South line 145.13 feet to the West lone of 57th Avenue South formerly Riverside Ave.; THENCE North 01 08'48" East along said West line 101.99 feet to an intersection with the Southwesterly extension of the Northwesterly line of the0 Southwesterly 50 feet of Lot 10 in said Block 8; THENCE North 46 18'48" East along said extension and Northwesterly line 81.66 feet to an intersection with a line which is parallel with and 100 feet Southwesterly from the Southwesterly line of Interurban Avenue (State Highway 5 -M), said line also being the Southeasterly corner of that certain tract as described in Contract of Sale to Lawrence Ash and Delores T. Ash, recorded under Recording No. 7207030250; THENCE along the Southwesterly line of said Ash Tract North 44 55'00" West along said parallel line 100 feet; THENCE South 46 °]8'48" West, 227.09 feet to a point which bears North 20 °48'02" West from a point of beginning; THENCE South 20 °48'02" East, 76.28 feet to beginning; EXCEPT portion, if any, of said Block 3, lying Westerly of Westerly lines thereof. All situate in the County of King, State of Washinaton. sg12.15 '/bias; TELEPHONE MEMO RE: /Jz2t,77,qL 5e;04- //Ufa!/ PERSON CONTACTED: /U,44IQ/ e 1 A1/_ .4I/I4 PERSON CALLING: .� DATE: %d LJ24J1 INFORMATION ITEMS: k LIAMMEIM WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Commercial Brokerage Company June 2nd, 1986 Moira Bradshaw Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Moira: 11$111MM JUN 31986 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Please find enclosed the easement for access between the Fewel Site and the Sperry Lot and Lot 1, the site of the proposed Moody - Bloomquist Building. We are preparing the other needed easements; access through Flexi -V and joint use of the dumpster. We are also proceeding with the Boundary Line Adjustment. Yours truly, udith G. Stoloff JS:pp 14.16 Enclosure: 13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle, Washington 98168 • (206) 241 -1616 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM RECEIVED MAY 2 8 1986 TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: PIIBLICWORKS TO: [J BLDG Q PLNG `:F 1 P:.W.. n FIRE PROJECT 8.1,001/YIpU4* 645Ltp LOCATION JIttuzbtheami au . ¢ - 7 V, S. FILE NO. • CN- 8, 60 EPIC - 38-860 FILE - 810-a5-bR n POLICE n P & R DATE TRANSMITTED 5428 $ (o RESPONSE REQUESTED BY - g(p STAFF COORDINATOR 1(Y) D-L4a j y1 a2L J')auj RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT (STS' 4_, �n -�IL� �,. tC& I17 JAC T tieLOP/y) t -S Pt 1 A� 1)�c ,ft(1(tv�V 71 � 1c42 L_YY)L.i''S rk-n J 111 b� 4(' S OYllaNT '(l tvL(r ) fiI o -a/ & 0 p m Lam - o A LA T ' w Love izc.)ll to wi4v c-u77m -s w / AN S ID Isw VYL-1 Z eSNE, LfrNArfl )v ktcS S I1iNO J4 _T-LTV S-r'=C fL. o-\j 1 a 'S, v ,S—C.) ©-F- TirM (DL C ddd i5 -b 'PVC 4 131s X71 3 1 .csw T►koD bS) LLS csi s� �= A U S . -- r-lri■9Ju rn 1 -1 Pi (L A Nllt iscs OF- 1 t��L 1. EgN PIv ()To ) lM InNis hr-c( tn r--lv 1z-A -T"1, " \rt:TIVV_VU s 7.,--Z.)LLIk0 1-1 s g Li LL/ 7 3Lf : 'A-0L/>.- -- . DATE Pik I diVa1/0143 .��� ,uQg 6/0-46 COMMENTS PREPARED BY CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN - 16(0 EPIC - 3,28- g(o FILE - 86-5-C)R ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: 'i,z.BLDG4 ri PLNG n P.W. E] FIRE 0 POLICE (i P & R PROJECT WA &1,001/YILLiA &A.A.0141 LOCATION /A44) Q,(,(. d $57 , v. S. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 510V1$(0 'R+ESPO.NSE_. REQUESTED ._BY ( /if18(P,i STAFF COORDINATOR 1/11(9-6(1 j b Q RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY Azf _� C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN- 8(a -Uato EPIC - 3,28-862 FILE - 8(-,25-DR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [I BLDG 0 PLNG n P.W. FIRE FOLIC [i P & R PROJECT _ 81 /..1 TYl si L.Li ai" LOCATION UntbubtAvvID Q,t4 . ¢ S7 Aij, S. u FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 5Agig& RESPONSE REQUESTED BY - - (p /itig(p STAFF COORDINATOR e b b ado haul RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CONCERNS: 1. DOES 40 ANTICIPATED PARKING STALLS INCLUDE ANY EXISTING PARKING SERVING ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDINGS. 2. OF THE 40 STALLS...HOW MANY WILL BE NEEDED FOR EMPLOYEES AND 3. SETBACK AND STAIRWAY TO SECOND LE EL ON WEST SIDE WIIL PRESENT A VERY VULNERABLE TARGET TO ILLEGAL ENTRANTS, DURING AND AFTER BUSINESS HOURS. 0,002.6V40/ e2,, FOR LATEST INFORMATIONiND TECHNIQUES ON OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL BUILDING SECURITY. 5. THERE ARE STILL MAJOR LIABILITY CONCERNS AS RELATED TO THE WIDTH OF 57 AVE S WHERE IT SERVES THIS PROJECT AND THE OTHER IONEE TWO BUILDINGS ALREADY ON SITE....THE SAME CONCERNS APPLY TO THE INCOMPLETE SIDEWA-LK ON TIIE N0- RTHSIDf OF 57th AVE 6/3/86 pjl DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN - 8% -!(a(p EPIC - 3a$- Vo FILE — - DR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG 0 PLNG7 ri P.W. 0 FIRE 0 POLICE 0 P & R PROJECT ,th-o'YVI.(.LlA LOCATION /> ) &4.. SZ Ay, S, FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 5 /ag f g (o RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (01 /VP STAFF COORDINATOR ` D- 6//)\yja0(,Di1GLUJ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE c:17/ ta.g.entuti- 44on/mviL1 4i/Yc. Saie ce5fr,iJ/ief'/a(Cg,s.S (sWis t:5(0 e1y) %.thOdiPta/11-- 0171/4.1# fig /Ann/ -51)/-Zarae6&/ X'Vejt. kt/ 1.'14 .4■- rOi'A / COMMENTS PREPARED BY hig C.P.S. Form 11 r 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.. Buildin �- 11 1 • ru .� •- u 1 r- u atnrm water system permit. curb -cut permit. electrical permit, plumbing permit —King County ..draulics pe it _ '11 0A ' Ale ' M % 2op- 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Construction of a professional office building of approximately_ 9840 square feet. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over • *a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. • King County Tax Lot 10225 -03, Hillmans Seattle Gardens, Southwest of ntratfig7 -W7T itngta r- 13975 Interurban Avenue, Tukwila, Washington 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. ( Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None identified. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the /1' site,, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access is shown on the site plans. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the a proximate jistance to the /earest transit stop? % •/-^' =" riff Wi e_, Yes. In the general vicinity. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 4 c parking spaces will be provided. No spaces will be eliminated. Vi &' --- 4i rte/' d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 173.4 tripsgenerated per day. Peak volume would occur in the early morning, noon and late atternoon. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: _ SitP arrPts and rirrulatinn will by designed with input frnm the City._nf Tukwila engineering department. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project may generate an increased need for basic services of fire and police protection The building is type V -N construction and will be sprinklered per City of Tykwila requirements. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN - $6 -/610 EPIC - 3A.- 8(0 FILE - 8(0-5.-DR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: El BLDG Q PLNG r P.W. n FIRE 0 POLICE [n- P -b-Rj PROJECT EL0'011(1. �1I LOCATION J)24'U Q,1X $-7 V4 S. FILE N0. DATE TRANSMITTED 5 h2g Jg ( tREPONSE_REQUESTEO -BY STAFF COORDINATOR 1110 -6LCI j b ad haw RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE , /,..2_, 6 COMMENTS PREPARED BY-o,,.._`�A C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • 0-86--1610 EPIC - 3,28-860 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG Q P.W. "cf:IFIREi, 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT LA,o-9/Y1A tekUi .Qd,[iYIL�, LOCATION } ) £2 2 . S7 At/. S. Q FILE NO. ;RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (y /1/-/E6-0 p DATE TRANSMITTED S /fig g� STAFF COORDINATOR ` D-61 Ll j bQL(,Dyja/{/ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT /6- )0.6 .G c.,-46 c f Fes. DATE S Z8 • 8 , COMMENTS PREPARED BY 7/C-C- • C.P.S. Form 11 Con41/1 $ &- /" Epic File No. &P/C38(. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. )54g ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Moody /Bloomquist 2. Name of applicant: Mithun Bowman Emrich Group, P.S. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Nancy O'Brien 2000 - 112th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 454 -3344 4. Date checklist prepared: April 21, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The project is expected to break ground in nr.tabpr Construction time is estimated at six months. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. -2 falEHWID MAY 2 21986 . CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Building permit. sewer hook -up permit, sign permit, water hook -up permit. atom water system permit. curb -cut permit, electrical permit, plumbing permit. King County Hydraulics permit 11. Give brief, complete description of. your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Construction of a professional office building of approximately 98Q0 square feet. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over 'a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. King County Tax Lot 10225 -03, Hillmans Seattle Gardens, Southwest of Tnitatfi _____ t____ nn-- 13975 Interurban AvenueL_Tukwila, Washington 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. TO'BE COMPLETED BY APPL • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one):( Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes mountainous, of b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be minimal to allow for proper drainage of the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. Some soil disruption may occur during backfilling of building footing and foundation work. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project 'construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 60% • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other, impacts to the earth, if any: 'Temporary erosion control shall be maintained during construction. 2. Air What types of emissions to the air would result from the • proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During roofing application of approximately 2 days. some objectionable odors may occur. Site grading temporarily may produce dusty conditions if grading occurs during a dry period. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe' and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of, the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? if so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and •anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the. following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be collected on site and piped into a flow control structure catchbasin. This will be connected to the City of Tukwila storm drain system. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. . Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water imoacts, if any: 2 aatchbasins'wa.11 be provided on the site. These will hook up with the City of Tukwila - .storm drainage system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,• buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? _ The existing site is predominately devoid of vegetation. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A landscape plan is proposed and attached to the permit set oo diawin9s. A mixture of native and ornamentaldeciduous a- nd— coniferous spec es is propose . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. list any threatened or endangered species known to . be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy will be used for the buildings heating and air conditioning requirements. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No_ c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building insulation will be provided to meet state energy codes. Solar control glazing will be used to reduce building energy consumption. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,' risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous, waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The construction process of + six months will generate an increase of noise during normal business hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. Office buildings are to the immediate north, east and south. The property to the west is residential. . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? c_2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has .any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 46 • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project is compatible with exist g and projected land uses. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Approximately 24 feet. The exterior materials will_ be a combination of stucco and wood siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The site will be illuminated at night with light standards. Lights within the building will be visible if people are working at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Glazing selected for the building is of a low reflectivity to minimize glare. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: See (b) above. • 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None identified. c. Proposed measures to reduce orr control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access is shown on the site plans. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. In the general vicinity. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 4o parking spaces will be provided. No spaces will be eliminated. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 173.4 tripsgenerated per day. Peak volume would occur in the early morning, noon and late afternoon. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Site arrecc and circulation will be dPsignPd with input from the City of Tukwila engineering,_ _ department. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project may generate an increased need for basis services of fire and police protection. The building is type V -N construction and will be sprinklered per City of Tykwila requirements. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities Evaluation for Agency Use Only a.„_r P U Llities currently able he—si_t electricity�n ural gas�� water, ; refuse services telephone,' sanitary sewed -Mtic s st-cm, bier. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No utilities are proposed in addition to those circled under item a. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 5 "? '- .TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLAN. D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the.item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? • Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, • wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: • How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO.BE COMPLETED BY APPLI• E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful. in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a-general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To provide 9RflO square feet of office building on an existing sire. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 1. Build on a different site. 2. Enlarge or decrease the scope of work. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: 1.. The site is currently vacant and designated commercial by the Tukwila comprehensive plan. The proposed project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. ? ThP prnject ac prnpncPd is cnmpatihle in crate with the Inning rPgnirPments fnr C -? prnpPrty Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- z 0 1- 0 03 4 J ]C 1 IOWA 11.011 LANDSCAPE PLAN P. so. SITE SITE MAP •- VICINITY MAP • NINr: ' ra 'a- mmo t. Nan s -- NORTH ELEVATION 1 I I `E I+ d.IWhlO io .+wL 0111=0 h+nl ' [+ntAllOt L.b+Tb./tr 41wa1 0H 401. PI/•I Y.WI.p M ►I b60 . Wawa saa.0.671 0.1641,46 /t o.t 110: SWOP., - 16 faVrir - 7A Tw .j K n. tr t• R. >r t.. ur t• R•.I1• R. r•. l r t• WII'R. r.. ur •• R•.Y• n.• _ r•t ltr u••u R. r Tna•WW Swim" mraIrdwra MAY 2 2 1986 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. 1 EAST ELEVATION a IN= �NNNN� NNE 8Z __ MI= 1•111111MIM me .111110 E .t ;'. IPINN WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION W N W 0> 2a 0 Oz ma m } gc off, 2z MITNUN • • IMICS. •2C. _7( ♦ "F��C• 5t a: :').:C ••:n. oF `E OJT, �t'.tl.SW ;.' JOB NO magi CAI s u Ilr coos& E+cMr,N1t G -2. PLANT SCHEDULE Ilmot;'sda u c o tteal IUNR2 1111 c LV :6,. t.d d .M s.r- /sW1.1« )o b. :Et UTsrw� ▪ IS'.12' R MAI Er . 7' , r -2 1/• s.ct.d .• s.•Ta•tltq Q 11r11:2-121;:. -2 -121/:. C' LI .tdus•r $tyrsct/1•s /S..t4 A' -I2• tO. • C• - • Clete ri1.WNt . Sold Stab • rs.uptsq• Ifs.al.itt /0•.glss 'Iv r.a r C' u• -u' I/ III. cz, ■.d. i• Nita 'NM•= /t•.e• 1.! 4. Pats fta••t12 • prouwo _ oc . TT. -I�C�41�I�J :.)1 1- I !` a ) T LANDSCAPE PLAN 20' r-- t■•,lr•, rip? o: bu4.M4S ra wrvE e'Rnuo 2 J%1. ExTeinoc L,urtTi►•1m 4, ■.io4 4 a 4 0jllL FLAW ftm6o1N fse744 : 9Ceo tack ICT+e RlAwRiD: & 40404 146 PRavIDGC : coH T 21 T•- MAY 2 21986 CITY OF TUKiAilLA PLANNING DEPT. SITE • SITE MAP 0 o w } VICINITY MAP NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION ta —Z M la 0> 24 0 OZ J Q m m >-ce O 01— TUKWILA, WASHINGTON. MITIIIUN • • EMRICH G mour PS .'EQ■CR DES!GN 20CC112TwALT vE :vu: .g t4 ;20C,453,3.34,1 03 NO Moro CAS s • u er 8105120686 AFTER RECORDING PLEASE MAT TO: WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTI 33838 Pacific Highway Sout "t-.'4A"•"' Federal Way, WA 98003 i:. >: i::`: Attn: Lesley RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT '' ' Agreement made this ``(7. day of May, 1981, between DONALD A. MOODY and NANCY MOODY, husband and wife, STEVEN M. HARRIS and BENITA HARRIS, husband and wife, and JOHN F. BLOOMQUIST and CO JANICE S. BLOOMQUIST, husband and wife, all as tenants in O CQ common ( "Moody "), and SEATTLE REALTY, INC., PENSION TRUST CD ( "Seattle Realty "), hereinafter sometimes collectively referred GO to as "the parties". WHEREAS, Moody is the owner of Lots 1, 2 and 3, and Seattle Realty is the owner of Lot 4 of the following described prop- erty: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Short Plat No. 80- 36 -SS, File No. 8102 02 058 2, situate in King County, Washington, and more fully described on Attachment A hereto which is incorporated herein by this reference, and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained, the parties covenant and agree for them- selves, and their heirs, successors and assigns, ' as follows: 1. Easement to Seattle Realty. Moody grants r to Seattle a&maintaining Realty an easement for the purpose of constructing/an entryway and parking area as jn`rd9icaaed._o;n_ ;the _>si.t.e!? ;plan, a copy of which is ar,t,tach,ed: hereto7a- s-At- tachment -BI the cost of construction of c the parking area and entryway to be borne by Seattle Realty. Seattle Realty grants to Moody and all tenants and licensees of the Moody property, or any part thereof, and their business invitees, licensees and employees, the right to use the entry - ingress and egress way, free of charge, for ess)s to the Moody property. -1- 8105120686 • • 2. Mutual Parking Easement. Moody and all tenants and licensees of the Moody property, or any part thereof, and their business invitees, licensees and employees, shall have the right to use, free of charge, the parking area constructed by Seattle Realty (which expression as used herein includes entrances, exits, driveways and walks) in common with Seattle Realty. All tenants and licensees of the property owned by Seattle Realty, or any part thereof, and their business invitees, licensees and employees shall have the right to use, free of charge, any parking areas constructed by Moody (which expression as used herein includes entrances, exits, driveways and walks). 3. Maintenance of Parking Areas. Until Moody has com- pleted construction of a parking area on the Moody property, Seattle Realty shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of the parking area which is designated on Attachment B here- to. Once Moody has completed construction of any additional parking on the Moody property, the maintenance and upkeep costs for all the parking areas shall be borne equally between Moody and Seattle Realty. 4. Covenants Running with Land. The easements hereby granted, the restrictions hereby imposed, and the agreements herein contained shall be easements, restrictions and covenants running with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, including, but without limitation, all -2- 8105120686 • • subsequent owners of the premises within the short plat and all persons claiming under them. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this agreement the day and date first above written. STEVEN M. HARRI'S BENITA HARRIS /JOHN F. BLOOMQUIS'r JANICE S.- BLOOMQUIST SEATTLE REALTY, INC., PENSION TRUST By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me DONALD A. MOODY and NANCY MOODY, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and volun- tary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of May, 1981. NOTARY PUBLIC . in -and for. the State of Washington,.residing at King County -3- 03 0 N 0 CD • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. ) COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me STEVEN M. HARRIS and BENITA HARRIS, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and volun- tary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. under my hand and official seal this 1 GIVEN 1981. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING .f... '�; t` 1.�•• j . . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the : State..'of.`r Washington, residing at King County l ' ... On this day personally appeared before me JOHN F. BLOOM - QUIST and JANICE S. BLOOMQUIST, to me known to be the individu- al described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official 1981. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING • seal this C 5 .;v•J ti F iii;,?' day ,o.f :.May;_. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at King-County ss On this day of May, 1981, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of- Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared • 'f bf , to me known to be the SEATTLE REALTY, INC., PENSION TRUST, the 'corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that (s)he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • • Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day • • J .. NN NOTARY PUBLIC( in and :for ,the State of Washingtori; •residing •'. in King County and year first above written. 6274A 8105120L86 Recording Numb "'HORT PLAT NO, 5o ' 3. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON. This space reserved for recorder's use Filed for record at the request of: Jim Patton Name Return to: APPROVAL Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this %TN day o f NIlwCJ.J.5E42, 19 8 O. Chair n, Short S Planning Division Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, .Washington 98188 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED ision Commits DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS Day of , 19 ASSESSOR DE: U . ASSESSOR c;nct: all men by thes esents that we, the undb igned, owner(s) in fee simple and contract pug laser(s) of the land h €. in described do hereby rake.a short subdivision thereof.pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and acknowledge that said short subdivision shall not be further divided in any manner .within a period of five years, from date of record, without the filing of a final plat. The undersigned further declare this short plat to be the cra;:'-;c representation of said short subdivision and tha*_same is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of.the owner(s). In witness whereof we have set our hands and seals. x Name Delores M. Magr Name Marilyn R. Patton Name Name Name Name STATE OF WASHINGTON, County of VA On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be)the individual described in and who executed the with- in and for,',eggoing instrument, and acknowledged that .,�\ signed the same as Tu2�-L free and voluntary act and deed, for tire uses and pur- poses therein mentioned. ry � r. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this Z. day of S:'3� .w ./,,, 1970 OA. S • Notary Publd• in and for the State of Washington, residing at r- 6 `-.-tQ seal STATE OF WASHINGTON, County of On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the with- in and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and pur- poses therein mentioned. GIVEN under zhy hand and official seal this day of , 19 seal --•• =1at ',urber Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,. residing at Page of • .+ ,';ncti. all men by these. sents that we, the and igned, owner(s) in fee simple and contract pur. aser(s) of the land h� n de`,'cribed do hereby rake a short subdivision thereof.pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and acknowledge that said short subdivision shall not be further divided in any manner within a period of five years, from date of record, without the filing of a final plat. The undersigned further declare this short plat to be the grarhic representation of said short subdivision and that same is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of.the owner(s). In witness whereof we have set our hands and seals. Name Name Name Darlene Crostick Name Name Name STATE OF WAS(HINGTON, County of On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the with- in and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and pur- poses therein .-mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this to day of 19 O • Notary PublicJn and for the State of Washington, residing at seal u STATE OF WASHINGTON, County of On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the with- in and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and pur- poses therein mentioned. GIVEN under rhy hand and official seal this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at seal Plat Number Page TOTAL PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, Block 3, and of vacated 57th Ave. S, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of said Lots 10 and 11 condemned for street in King County Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lot 10, Block 8 of said plat; EXCEPT that portion condemned for street under said Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH that portion of the north 660 feet of the Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 lying westerly of the above - mentioned Block 3 and easterly of 56th Place S; EXCEPT that portion lying southerly and westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly line of Interurban Ave. with the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 50.00 feet in width of Lot 10 in said Block 8; Thence N 43041'12" W along said Interurban Ave. 100 feet to the Point of Beginning of said line; Thence S 46 °18'48" W parallel to the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 327.09 feet; Thence N 20 °48'02" W 52.55 feet; Thence N 33 °04'33" W 295.62 feet; Thence N 08 °37'00" W a distance of 90.00 feet to the north line of said Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 and the terminus of said line. SUBJECT TO a slope easement over the northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A. F. #6390811. ALSO SUBJECT TO a sewer easement over said northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #5683661. LOT 1 The south 125.00 feet of the following described parcel: Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, Block 3, and of vacated 57th Ave. S, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of said Lots 10 and 11 condemned for street in King County Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lot 10, Block 8 of said plat; EXCEPT that portion condemned for street under said Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH that portion of the north 660 feet of the Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 lying westerly of the above - mentioned Block 3 and easterly of 56th Place S; EXCEPT that portion lying southerly and westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly line of Interurban Ave. with the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 50.00 feet in width of Lot 10 in said Block 8; Thence N 43°41'12" W along said Interurban Ave. 100 feet to the Point of Beginning of said line; Thence S 46 °18'48" W parallel to the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 327.09 feet; Thence N 20 °48'02" W 52.55 feet; Thence N 33 °04'33" W 295.62 feet; Thence N 08 °37'00" W a distance of 90.00 feet to the north line of said Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 and the terminus of said line. SUBJECT TO a slope easement over the northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #6390811. ALSO SUBJECT TO a sewer easement over said northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #5683661. LESS the east 150.00 feet of said south 125.00 feet. TOGETHER WITH an ingress- egress and utilities easement over the north 22.00 feet of the south 147.00 feet of the east 135.00 feet and over the north 22.00 feet of the south 125.00 feet of the east 150.00 feet, all of said total parcel. LOT 2 Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, Block 3, and of vacated 57th Ave. S, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of said Lots 10 and 11 condemned for street in King County Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lot 10, Block 8 of said plat; EXCEPT that portion condemned for street under said Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH that portion of the north 660 feet of the Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 lying westerly of the above - mentioned Block 3 and easterly of 56th Place S; EXCEPT that portion lying southerly and westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly line of Interurban Ave. with the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 50.00 feet in width of Lot 10 in said Block 8; Thence N 43°41'12" W along said Interurban Ave. 100 feet to the Point of Beginning of said line; Thence S 46 °18'48" W parallel to the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 327.09 feet; Thence N 20 °48'02" W 52.55 feet; Thence N 33 °04'33" W 295.62 feet; Thence N 08 °37'00" W a distance of 90.00 feet to the north line of said Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 and the terminus of said line. SUBJECT TO a slope easement over the northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the . remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #6390811. ALSO SUBJECT TO a sewer easement over said northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #5683661. LESS the south 125.00 feet and the east 135.00 feet, thereof. TOGETHER WITH an ingress- egress and utilities easement over the north 22.00 feet of the south 147.00 feet of the east 135.00 feet and over the north 22.00 feet of the south 125.00 feet of the east 150.00 feet, all of said total parcel. Page of Short Plat No. F -2'9 -A LOT 3 • The east 135.00 feet of the following described parcel: Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, Block 3, and of vacated 57th Ave. S, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of said Lots 10 and 11 condemned for street in King County Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lot 10, Block 8 of said plat; EXCEPT that portion condemned for street under said Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH that portion of the north 660 feet of the Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 lying westerly of the above - mentioned Block 3 and easterly of 56th Place S; EXCEPT that portion lying southerly and westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly line of Interurban Ave. with the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 50.00 feet in width of Lot 10 in said Block 8; Thence N 43°41'12" W along said Interurban Ave. 100 feet to the Point of Beginning of said line; Thence S 46 °18'48" W parallel to the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 327.09 feet; Thence N 20 °48'02" W 52.55 feet; Thence N 33 °04'33" W 295.62 feet; Thence N 08 °37'00" W a distance of 90.00 feet to the north line of said Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 and the terminus of said line. SUBJECT TO a slope easement over the northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #6390811. ALSO SUBJECT TO a sewer easement over said northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #5683661. LESS the south 125.00 feet of said east 135.00 feet. SUBJECT TO an ingress- egress and utilities easement over the south 22.00 feet of the remainder thereof. TOGETHER WITH an ingress- egress and utilities easement over the north 22.00 feet of the south 125.00 feet of the east 150.00 feet of said total parcel. LOT 4 The east 150.00 feet of the south 125.00 feet of the following described parcel: Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, Block 3, and of vacated 57th Ave. S, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of said Lots 10 and 11 condemned for street in King County Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH Lot 10, Block 8 of said plat; EXCEPT that portion condemned for street under said Superior Court Cause #109001; ALSO TOGETHER WITH that portion of the north 660 feet of the Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 lying westerly of the above - mentioned Block 3 and easterly of 56th Place S; EXCEPT that portion lying southerly and westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the intersection of the southwesterly line of Interurban Ave. with the northwesterly line of the southeasterly 50.00 feet in width of Lot 10 in said Block 8; Thence N 43°41'12" W along said Interurban Ave. 100 feet to the Point of Beginning of said line; Thence S 46°18'48" W parallel to the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 a distance of 327.09 feet; Thence N 20 °48'02" W 52.55 feet; Thence N 33 °04'33" W 295.62 feet; Thence N 08 °37'00" W a distance of 90.00 feet to the north line of said Joseph Foster Donation Land Claim #39 and the terminus of said line. SUBJECT TO a slope easement over the northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #6390811. ALSO SUBJECT TO a sewer easement over said northeasterly 10.00 feet, of the remainder thereof, as recorded under A.F. #5683661. SUBJECT TO an ingress- egress and utilities easement over the north 22.00 feet, thereof. TOGETHER WITH an ingress- egress and utilties easement over the north 22.00 feet of the south 147.00 feet of said total parcel. Snort plat I;o. . -2 ^9 Page • 1 1 � / i —ier -- / :, / -V } / / 1 1 t I 1 I ;\ t (n t 1 1 Land Surveyor's Certificate: This short plat correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate state statute and has been properly staked in .accordance with the Tukwila Subdivision Code. 90 Date Certificate No. Short Plat No. - 1,12,2 2. S7 Map on File in Vault Direction: Scale: Start: /". /oo Page of oZ-- -.4- - -- - - - 187 1. /et I 1 `a2 /�GRE6S '.L6G.PcSS E..SEMEc I 1 1 1 I". I `:I: I• 1 1 I I 1.: 'ya . Sro e'4 . 6B BLL,4 74 • /;ISO. 00. I . . 1 Be O L TCGE 00 N • 1 I: 2Z "'A GRE.5s • EG.PESS . 6ASCME4 7 • -:P . S.yO.CT PG.4Y ALSO. POWE•e .E./SEMENT (.4I P Ai' EJ.iOB200 30 R/M • .74. 73'. 7 7, T L, i 6� V i w I t A✓.L i I : I I I I p Nli¢ II g f .CEU.G.3 _ XRTRB UTEP. I " " D,e/ , 78. tia .. r I. -j I h� _. ?ItR.: WALL ^ / �1 IG 10 44./0, - z /O le �14j om /. V fT { 1I ���• ,i A ✓E N .. G RA/D) - i N. E. 4 .:i : ' 2 ...CYO � f 'S �.. 1 �. -., G e4/O FF / 9. 02 �• IJI dI a ,Lh ti •IAia. I� /OU /G I.StS M.N" '0(4/EA VAVG7,' 5. • EX/ST ArLEK (rrP) SGAL E•' / _ ZO • EX /ST>fS 4-4A, / //9z6 (-TY /P) . VERT /CAL OBI TUM yob; •/8'481'E S HEAT PUMP) v /Z9 0 30 '1 .. A-C• BM:�c.3 1-// -9 EL24/= /9.7/ . E eLY C0 2. OF CONC. FOOT //✓G FO e " TEGE• BOOT/! 1.80 0774/ / GO.r/E) .4 /(/L✓ 6'/VG Y co-e. /.VT eBA ' AVE.... ,C/7E- BM BE / GE!/ =ZO.¢9 h✓E.'LS/` MOST U.POE.Q FLANGE BOLT ON F' /,PE ffYO,9A/t/T O:v G✓. .S/OE OF /i1�7L- %PY/,PBAA/ A1/E- . S APf°/eOX• 36 -17E.: P.eeP. . CO,e. lest: rnllt'115!J JUN .1 G 19861 CITY VF TU�V`JiiA . PANNING DEPT. LEC4Z DESC/P //°T /D/f/ LOT .4 OF C /Tf! :OF TUIrG✓ /z .4 S's/OPT PLAT NO. AS PECO.PpEO' 'UNpE.e ...AUO /TO.gS" F /GE .4/0 . B /020zOSB2' .PEC0.20S` OF . s--/A/G: . COUNTY, Gt/ASiS/ /NG TON. .3'dB ✓ECT TO ALL EgSEME.t/TS OF SA /O SLAT. .SUB ✓ECT . TO A. ..SEG✓E.e :EASEMENT avF,e ` TNE. E� >y- EASTEeCY FEET Or SA /p COT ,L : AS ' PECO PpEp L..44/0E.e. Az/o/7-0,e-s- FILE N O.. .1-6.e .366/. S'dBJEC T -TO - ..4 .SG OPE EASEMEiI/r- 0I/E.P Z:,-/E E4 74,.eG Y: /O 'FEET : OF SA /O L O T St AS DECO ?oEp 4't/OE.e /1U0 /T'.P S F/G E itNO. G 3908// SUB iECT .: TO 43Z 41) As' ,exCO.BOG -Q A7/O /TO,€ S . F /GE A/O. B 0si2.06ed. ; UB,/EC7: TO PO£�/ER EASEMEA/TS -A A.Vp d'(UA/OESF/.V.OBG6) AS .REC0:e0E0 UNO -.e AF T'B /OB 200630 - - SU9.✓E07- TO -.A- !/7` /L /TY EASEMENT OGEee T//E y0.27;4/EAS7ccec:/- Y3'FEET':THE.2EOF, .AJ: .eECO:eOEO UNOE.e AF+".8- 08270SLd+ 0 /MOTES' /%: BOeJ.v 4 Q5 �TVRtiE/ .2ECO.e0E,o 44/ : •800M- 28 /°.4GE 34 L//.VOE.0 •qF #BroG /S9oo/ ,eECO.eO3 of srivG Cat/,y -' WAS// /NGToA/ `. 2) i°R42PE.e71/.; APPE'A/2S p.t/ U.S OE•T. of /XL/ FL00.0 /NS.' .,. C30c/NOA/E? {/ ", MipP . Cp v/MC/4/ /T5/ : PANEL . NO. S2 O0 9/ - 000Z B FA/VEG / OF 2 N I A 204- C OESiGNA T /O,(/. 3) P,4.PCEL .4./ 774/.1./S I 'jp 7S0' 'SQ. FT } 0. 3 .4c. !-) 4� BU /G O /NG C.04/7.4/4/.5 4720.27 -Cep : FT. _ (G.POGr/1/O FL00 2) ;5� ST.t?EET ; AOO eESS I /A/TE,PU.eB.9.V 98/86. G,) /VO4/ t/ /SABLE UT /C /7-/E; S//oWN A.PE PE.e O.PAL✓iyG - Bl/ sTEPA.V ¢' ASSOC:" OATE-O 7- /7 -,g /. _ SZ/A:VES./O/PS CE.E'T /.7CA'T /D/V -_ f/E.EEBY C6i2T /FY 'T//AT 7-/! /S "/iJA,� /S A T.PUE" ANp CO3e,e4-C T: _ •PE'.°.eESENTA 7704/ O,=" .4 BOU�1/LO '.e 0 ' A/VL7 S /T� iAS BU /L7'. `SU- k8. ' _ /OE .Bt/..A-1E' 0,e e/,f/OE --e 0 %2ECT - ,PESPONS /B /G /Ty ANO 7;4;4 7- -4GG OitilEitNSiO�r/S A/VO L'CAT /OW/s OF , BU /LO /4/G5 `,/EZeE0,1/, COPeECT -44/0 ' TyE.BE .APE /(/D . E/f/C:>?OAC•/�JENTS ':0� O!/E� LAPS �XZ'EPT' AS �5.5/OLciit/ /lE2EO.f/ ;44"GO.EPO /4/6' . 72 NJ4 .0E : AUGUST 2 0 . /9 B/ :. "47- ?Bq!/EST nF ASSOC., A a✓gry /NCTONL /M /TG-O 1 .am - 4.. - CE.Q7- -.A/0.: i /986. • 5 /TE AS- SU /LT 017t'.PAI7t 0 IlY I011N II. LINING AND ASSOCIATES IVII I N(IN1 1.111Ntf' - Rt"ANNING•SOESIGN 12061 852 -6633 111 I11 1YI1''111140014 u- IiiitnWN UY' ------\CHECKEO BY /_'7:42