The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-33-90 - BOEING - PLANT 2 OIL/WATER SEPARATORBOEING PLANT II OIL SEPARATOR 9725 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH EPIC -33 -90 ,&\IJILA Isy CITY OF TUKWILA - PUBLIC WORKS FAX TRANSMITTAL 1908 FAX NUMBER: (2 00 431- 3665 TO: /%' /I DATE: TITLE: FROM: TITLE: COMPANY: DEPARTMENT: //////0 ace uesoe�+y.+�w:.�M ?'a?+�+;!•xoen�xw�w?. w-e ++vn uno�+awww'•.vrow. vmet. owyon. DEPARTMENT: M Vi.MFA:.O.wb:Ni FAX NO. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET; • . 4)+: 144.: 4F0.v:: w: vYw v.i1Jhn:<Nw:4:'iO+:OiRJA:+.iv::: ✓AV...?N:.:..?. v.:.::.:.A i -. • ::S a ri.L•',Ow.: SENT BY (INITIALS): :uS. -••∎ A.,:w :. AiOJ.:.4•wai4:iASAi'w,Oxaviw: :..;NOW, hNw • SUBJECT: COMMENTS /MESSAGE: • IF THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT CLEARLY RECEIVED. PLEASE CALL: 14)4 nA4.JJ:-:Siv+v::C%MC:L.•w nVi.:1•Tt 10:0Ji1v Xv(0040%110i0►■ : TUKWILA CTIY HALL - 6200 Southcernter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 - (206) 433 -1800 03/24, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 45t. S.&S November 13, 1990 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Twkwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: M.N NOV 15 1990 CITY (* 7UKNILA PLANNING DEPT. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the installation of an oil /water separator for a storm sewer line by Boeing Military Air- planes. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. The proposed project must be consistent with all applicable policies and other provisions of the Shoreline Management Act, its rules, and the local shoreline master program. This includes, but is not limited to, those master program provi- sions pertaining to utilities in Urban shoreline environ- ments. It appears the work will occur in unincorporated King County. King County's Shoreline Master Program ( KCSMP) will apply to this project. If the City has annexed the area, the KCSMP standards will still apply until Tukwila updates its master program to include the annexed area. The total proposal must be included in the required shoreline permit application. The project site plan included in the permit application must meet the requirements of WAC 173 -14 -110. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Don Bales of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459 -6762. 6275 cc: Don Bales, Shorelands Linda Rankin, Shorelands Sincerely, (40-04L Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section 3 C 0 BOE /Nw Boeing Military Airplanes P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 November 9, 1990 L- 6210 -SKK -307 Attn: Darren Wilson City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Subject: King County Certificate of Water Availability Dear Mr. Wilson: Enclosed is a copy of the King County certificate of water availability, Certificate #90 -1455 that was requested by your office. Any questions concerning this certificate please contact Steve Kipisz, 544 -2985. L. F. Boul.4•er L -6200 46 -87 544 -2861 Seattle Water Department PROPERTY ADDRESS : q 7 a5 E , ma,, W y ( s LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 5 ae:\ A 4f a` Lke Certificate Number ��_; SWD Map/Kroll :304. OWNER: T e B ne., in '6) Co. LESSEE: CONTACT PERSON: ire: N' y en nQ +.71. .PHONE: 6.4,1-ails- ADDRESS: P0. B 3707) AlS 'fib -R7 ZIP: y$ 124 -aa07 REVENUE CLASS Dist. main to margin ft. Street Width Static Pressuref 3a. PS/ design pressure /l a P S / ft. CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS AT TIME OF SERVICE APPLICATION 1.A Payment of metered water service change per current charge schedule and special surcharges where due Signed and notarized no protest agreement and payment of $3.00 recording fee B.1 Watermain no protest agreement B.2 Fire Service no protest-agreement (required for all Fire Service applications) 1.B 1.0 Payment of charges for King County R/W Permit 1.D Payment of charges for Wash. D.O.T. R/W Permit 1.E Other requirements 1.F Payment of /or contracting for payment of special tap charges as follows: Frontage Units @ $ Per unit = $ 1.G The following information is required for all domestic and combination fire /domestic services larger than 2" size., (Information to be provided by applicant). Minimum flow GPM Avg. Daily use GPD Maximum flow GPM agazzdoaddy sy 313a10 For information on how to make application for water service contact the Seattle Water Department, Customer Service Division, 821 - 2nd Avenue, 10th Floor, Seattle, WA 98104, phone (206) 684 -5800. Applicant will need copy of this certificate and legal description of property when making application. Application for service and payment of service and water main fees and charges is required before service will be provided. Depending upon service size and type, 30 to 90 days is required before service is available. Inspection of new service piping on the property is required before covering. Call 684 -5800 to arrange for inspection - 24 hour advance notice is normally required. For information on how to arrange for improvements needed, contact the Seattle Water Department, Engineering Technical Services, 821 - 2nd Avenue, 10th Floor, Exchange Building, Seattle, WA 98104. Phone (206) 6884 -5975. Copy of Certificate Sent To Date by EFE:kle EA75:P2 -3 10/84 Rev: 6/88 This certificate provides the Department of Health and Building & Land Development with information necessary to evaluate development proposals Please return to: BUILDING & LAND DEVELOPMENT 3600 136th Pl. S.E., Suite A Bellevue, Washington 98006 (206) 296 -6600 KING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY. Uo not write in this box number name Building Permit Short Subdivision APPLICANT'S NAME J 2 B D 2 n PROPOSED USE Preliminary Plat or PUD Rezone co. or other LOCATION co As 6. Ynl a,rc,) n a.1 6.)y S. # # # # # (Atttach map & legal description if # if # # WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a. W Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing 4172Y1' water m�a'in �Y S . ��feet from the site, site OR in �( S ry1 b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: ❑ (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and /or ❑ (2) the construction of a distribution system on the site; and /or ❑ (3) other (describe) OR b. 4. a. OR b. s;4e & type The water system is in cohformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. King County Ordinance #7991 The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. King County Franchise #616 - North •of city limits El #617 - South of city limits #318 Former water district 61 area ❑ Annexation or BRB. approval will be necessary to provide service. Water is /or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant A n 5.4.1e feet from the building /property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow Duration ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ less than 1 hours ❑ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours ❑ 1000 gpm or more FOR ❑ 2 hours or more ❑ flow test of gpm ❑ other ❑ CALCULATION OF gpm (Commercial Building Permits require flow test or calculation) Water system is not COMMENTS /CONDITIONS capable of providing fire flow. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certify ation shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ca` \ rt • 3 m h G Agency Name , . a ignat• y N,e l WAC 197 -11 -970 •; DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Installation of an oil /water separator on a storm sewer ljne to prevent possible spills from entering the Duwamish River, Proponent Boeing / Carl Bach Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 9725 East Marginal Way S. Tukwila, WA. Sec. 4 Twn. 23 Range 4E Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-33 -90 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. e There is no comment period for this DNS (l This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tu w Date Signature Phone 433 -1846 188 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.ONS eo4Fiiv17 October 30, 1990 L- 6510 -CMB -294 Boeing Defense & Space Group Military Airpt naa liivigipn P.O. Box 3707 - Soattla, WA 0f3124 -2207 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 Subject: Boeing Oil /Water Separator The following 1s a response to information requested on October 30, 1990. 1. During construction, there is not expected to be any spills because no hazardous materials will be utilized on the project. Any possible spills resulting from equipment failure (hydraulic excavation or lifLing equipment) will be immediately cleaned up by the 24-hour on -site hazmat team. The Department of Ecology is issuing dewatering requirements for storm water, ground water and river water which may accumulate in the construction pit. 2. Boeing will comply with DOE /EPA, Metro, Tukwila Public Works and all other applicable regulations and municipality requirements. Contaminated water will be discharged to the sanitary sewer only upon Metro approval. If the water is noL acceptable for discharge into the sanitary sewer, then the water will be shipped to a Boeing owned treatment plant. or TSD facility as required. 3. The oil /water separator is being installed as a precautionary measure to prevent hydraulic oil, bearing oil, diesel fuel and other petroleum products used in large industrial equipment from entering the river. A shear gate is also being installed to enable the hazmat team to entirely close off the storm sewer line. Secondary containment is always provided for equipment as required. At the Developmental Center, 6 similar oil /water separators have been installed for the same purpose, Construction for this separator is scheduled to begin immediately. We would appreciate your expeditious review of this project to avoid construction delays. If you have any questions please contact me. Carl Bach Engineer Environmental Affairs M/S 4H -26 phone: 544 -1225 Concurrence: J. T. Johnstone Manager Environmental Affairs M/S 46 -87 544 -2861 'ITY OF TUKW/LA WARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 NVIRONML N I AL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC: -33.- a ROJECT �D� �, /�lz4 2 DDRESS 99o7S e57 7, % w,4L AVy _5. ATE TRANSMITTED /Q RESPONSE REQUESTED BY *;z /7-0 TAFF COORDINATOR fl') DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED Boeing Oil /Water Separator Environmental 1. Page 6, item 6: Identify precautions to be taken to protect local drainage from surface spills and runoff during construction. The applicant should be prepared to pump storm water around the construction, as well as to pump water from the construction pit into the sanitary sewer (when appropriate, and with METRO permit only). 2. Item 10, pg. 3: Comply with DOE /EPA, METRO, and Tukwila Public Works requirements. A METRO discharge permit should be obtained for discharge of any surface or ground water which may be contaminated. 3. The installation of an oil /water separator is not sufficient protection from a hazardous materials spill. The applicant should clearly identify the reason for this action. Is this simply a precaution is the event that required containment measures fail? /00d :ITV OF TUKWILA EPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Td: ! �ul(ding Planning 'ROJECT ,eoe,v ENVIRONM TAL REVIEW ROUTI FORM EPIC: —53— 42) ,DDRESS 9162$ l?-1i7 S . •)ATE TRANSMITTED /%t- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /C/40--e) ;TAFF COORDINATOR /2�,?,?' ) /?)/45,',J)7 DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED • The attached environmental checklist was. received regarding `this project. Please review`an comment below to advise the responsible *Official regarding the threshold determination . environmental ;review file is available in the Planning Department through theabove&taify . coordinator.. Co mans regarding the project you wish carried, to the planning mi :Comssion, .•:, • :Board of.Adjustment and City Council should be submitted In the'comment section betgvl. ITEM COMMENT Date: ,.._ 1 O - I� - I Comments prepared by: 09114/84 NMWTAL REVIEW TIM FORM :ITY OF TUKWILA EPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELO TO: Building ' O Plannin • • 'ROJECT ga„,2, police 1Rec` .DDRESS 9A• /1J�9 2,43L C1/ ..S . ATE TRANSMITTED /6/5--*) *j RESPONSE REOUESTED BY /0//z/7-0 ;TAFF COORDINATOR / /9J,Qz) Za4 ,,, DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review: an comment below to advise the reSponsible official regarding the threshold determination ;:The environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the "above staff, coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning :Commission, ." Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below,.; ITEM COMMENT Date: /0/Xi Comments prepared by: OW1uea ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Contr�' No. Epic 191e No. Fee-44607N Receipt N ECEIVED )L; 4 1 1L-i• 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Oil /Storm Water Separator 2. Name of applicant: Boeing Military Airplanes 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P.O. Box 3707, M/S 4H -26 Seattle WA 98124 -2207 Contact: Carl Bach, 544 -2965 4. Date checklist prepared: 8/19/90 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Preliminary schedule: Installation and construction to occur during the months of October and November. Actual construction should take approximately two full weeks. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Approval will be required by the Department of Ecology for any dewatering activities. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Installation of an oil /water separator on a storm sewer line to prevent__ possible spills from entering the Duwamish River. The size of excavation will be approximately 20'x20'x20'. Projected cost of the project is $106,000. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. °Boeing Developmentai'Center. 9725 East Marginal Way South. Tukwila WA (See sj.te 'map fQ7r location of separator installation) 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICIiii B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 20% (bank of the Duwamish River) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty clay and sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Soil is old tide flat and fill material. Soil is relatively stable. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill will be required around the concrete separator vault. The fill will consist of clean washed sand, gravel and excavated soil material. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally. describe. Slight erosion occurred during previous separator installations due to changing tide levels and close proximity to the Duwamish River. Shoring will be provided where necessary to prevent erosion. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 95% g. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • i Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Shoring will be provided where necessary. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water .body on'or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- • round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The separator will be installed on a storm sewer line leading to the Duwamish River. The Duwamish River flows to Puget Sound. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The separator will be installed on a storm sewer line within 200 feet of the Duwamish River. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Ground water and /or Duwamish River water may need to be pumped out of the construction area back to the river. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes. The entire site lies within a 100 -year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Only ground water or Duwamish River water. -6- • b. Ground: 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Ground water may need to be Humped from the con- struction area to the Duwamish River. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;. industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. During construction, storm water may need to be discharged to the Duwamish River. After construction, storm water will pass through the separator before being discharged to the river. • .Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Construction of the separator will occur during low tides to minimize the amount of dewatering. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs �c grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will'be removed or altered? Some blackberry bushes and weeds may need to be removed to access the storm water outfa1l, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. (heron) • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: (iTaTii) Duck, Gull eagle, (songbird) other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None. fish: bass,(salmon) trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, . wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, .generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? list other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. The separator will actually prevent yossihlp spills from reaching the Duwamish River. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any:. None. -10- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2). What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. None. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Commercial, manufacturing, industrial. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Industrial and manufacturing buildings. • •Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M/H (Heavy Manufacturing) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? M/H (Heavy Manufacturing) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban. 9. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. • k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The separator installation is the same as existing separators on site. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? Not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What , is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The separator will be installed entirely underground. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. -13- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? A Boeing recreation facility is located at an adjacent site (Oxbow Site). Green belts within the site provide employees with picnic areas and walkways. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. -14- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. The Museum of Flight is located next to the site (on the east side of East Marginal Way South). c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. East Marginal way South. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to_the nearest transit stop? Yes. Public transit stops on site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. SEvaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. _ No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. -16- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently able at the site el ectricit�r)[natural gas) {refuse service e ep one tsanitary sewer') septic system, other. Storm sewer b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Storm sewer, system. Construction will involve excavation, dewatering pouring concrete, laying pipe, backfilling. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make i - recision. Aer Signature: Date Submitted: 962 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA, D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Bec• se these questions are very general, it may be helpful to re:d them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the en ironment. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only When ans -ring these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, r the types of activities likely to result from the proposa , would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a fas•-r rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Resp. d briefly and in general terms. 1. How would t - proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; e 'ssions to air; production, storage, or release of tox or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoi or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve pla ts, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Propose measures to protect or conserve energy and natural esourses are: 4. How would the p environmentally se eligible or under such as parks, wil threatened or endange cultural sites, wetl farmlands? posal be likely to use or affect itive areas or areas designated (or udy) for governmental protection; rness, wild and scenic rivers, d species habitat, historic or nds, floodplains, or prime Proposed measures to protect such esources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affec shoreline use, inclduing whether it would encourage land or shoreline uses incompati existing plans? land and allow or le with -19- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only roposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land u impacts area: How does t - proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal •e likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or res'ond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal m. conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requir ents for the protection of the environment. -20- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Propos are: measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN i MPEvaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? the objective of installing an oil /water separator is to prevent possible spills from entering the Duwamish River. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are no alternatives. The separator is being installed as a precautionary measure to insure that any spills that could occur are contained within the separator. The separator is similar to the existing separators on site. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not applicable. -22- • • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: not applicable. -23- BOE /IVC at l OOfli 2 DEFENSE SPACE CROUP DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER TUKWILA, WA ACRES: 94.5 OWNED MA LEASED at11 8130 8103 «E:ISTOP 9-101 PARKING / (( 1 /././sz4, Tr 9.411 1 9110 867 / 84 3 • � n i 71 ' , 1 3 i 07 Y►RU1r FaGM' C&N?IA . AFl 1111 714.4 70 ea 74 r ,.Ru ODE NG'rIJSEW YAUtIAS Nr 7161u Pu EAST 1/4g6MM WAV SQJT« C� 1 "°"0 "4 SOUTH BOEING FIELD 0 - r----- __ - - - -- A D650 -10069 E -1 1, - E T ; -II 1 +r•I +hI_GA °_EO + %N USC tG5 _ A�;rrn •e TnI1V CITY OF SEATTLE [ r : utyrRAcr ,.. )E FT LOFN_.R OF BLOB 5 -55- N Id'7.00,E894 .00 1:T.-> 2u GAL WATES TtiNK — N 1371 _,Z; E ?d5.45 5 -91l 1` PELO. \ \ L0 LEGEND 4,M,.vS - MANr911(E HU'AGLf 5'IN 5Y5TEM.'V - •LGad - CATCH BASIN NUMBER Z IN SYSTEM G •,I — STOF..M DRAIN W• SIZE IN INCHES DIAMETER - -- - STORM GRAIN / NO.T-VERIFIED O - CLEAN 'VT 1 I RECEI OOTF•tt V 0.00 •4s27.11 E SGa.31 v OV TFALL OA 1..4 N730.00 f 1105.7C BEVISIOM ev APPROVED DATE 070 A pUty CTrf a6 AS -,F A REVISION : .NS- r., %(L, /1'iUN JFf Pi7'1i1j -OL ILL:TALL Nvv., 'SEr'y 4 rn. r'..! 1D(.' rVCCT 4� %we K1 c -v rIVlNC, eV APPROVED Fstk JD 73-77.7. 5 7 tF 0ATE I7S 0715T 7ET741 1,3G ❑ AUBURN, WA. ,98002- .0 EVERETT, WA. 98201.. • BOE/ArG. • :" ❑ KENT, WA. 98031 FACILITIES DEPA(TMENT. -: ❑ PORTLAND, OR. 97220 ❑ RENTON, WA. 98055 • SEATTLE, WA: 98124 ACCEPTABILITY THIS OE51GN ANOIOR SPECIFICATION 5 APPROVED APPROVED e1 0777M eV JLB eHELT1� • TM", .suenn n /ea. =SAS STORM DRAINS /M.-404w- ,-/' /8a ff r MuY.,0at5, APPROVED ., 1 MECHANICAL YARD MASTER.. LAST 037510•4 SHEET M -1 10B NO 008071- 01 O1G N0. 109- 000- 4501 • Do Nom Ev 103 1 S0.9 A 1 IM. r 4/ r•'... -0.41' 15 L•F , 10" P /- O.Z. %e (NEVI) MH AI. ((X171) TbP 15.5o' - I OI •TOTS.: ) INL4f AP /. C.., •• - 1.07 .k5• 10.) :NV. F1..' 407 N',Te• I. !REAA.-OVT C011C FILL. AT 50170~: OF 'MI Al CS A1301.1 AS R2aooze° TO R.A. - PVC P1ve• ' 4T_P00R COLIC. TO CI•,•,1 11 FLOW OC PIPES AT 153T L.E./GL Lr-, / 11.ILI: NV 0149 O.1T..; i' .NV. 10.) • •r...,' •••/ •y.• •a98.- ((x131. -•P') M)-1 b•Ib ::NI • aP - •' 6.6 INL INV '3.. - (e)(117. 55 , 5 ' 1 37- _x1•3b•') 0 rrJa, .N• /. �:... �. _' !NEVJ. 5') . •35 "O.P M-• SHS. (NEJ/1 -� :IhILET NJ. E._ =4.I /(E$.s -r DTI( 1 -v_NJ B-7 I^ x "C:P EXIST Tv MH • CI," .. Tor• c _ 14.'30. NLCT .91 {ERST..jU} ::). 1, INLET •NJ. FJ_ 3.�11INEW IS" ) -• 2Jr'. -5.1 ■N•/. 5..> S.= tt1.S.A1 7. IS•)< T 1E•- .1 ^1L_t.T NV N_�T' •v O' .N NJ.EL.= 4.14 (5 ) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ .. - PLI%fl. A. >>LX�7•^ �i�I .Iv 1:9_f.l� y■ a4J. •_ 6.30 • M iL ITAPY ' r- L;Ib.hl T. API%(LN - 1101E SA•1 CTi FXG1• ▪ •SLAG; n EVAJE WITH COFPAETe SLRg •OSl - GJMFAGTep 0RGk FILL• CARRY 5)051111G E%PAJ'=I `:.: • 1,1415 , TRW.. 'Jew FAVEMCr17..... . • -PROF L.. 357' - 15. Ut.r �1 •N./. ate,' Y:.B.i l !e.g. �A• • z.8 5' ..: =w 11."') T-1 INLCL = 13L70' INLET INV..- .= 2.36 ,t P,19 - �/..• SEP G-1 TOP EL = 15.23 PIET.EL - 1.21 OUTLET 1 = 1.13 ?> P Ayr - -1z :. INLET INV :1.= Rq (b 15LF. 100. DISCHARGE O 0.07% (NEW) 101 G-10 (NETT) TOP EL . 1523 • `1i; OOET NV. EL = 1.30 ((7051. 30') ..• OUTLET ON. EL. - 1.30 (COST. 30710y OIIIIFT Oa a; e1.20(NEW 10').,,, 30 PST.) .12 WC (NET, MH TTg. =W 1 TOf, INLET •N V. = I.12'!E %I -.'Lr.'/ /. :.7Z • N -�,/ 1-1.. O'. IT -1.7 - Ft -1,4 S O- rn hET� MI h•1.4 • • I 10H G-1 ((70S7.) TOP EL = 15.23 INLET INV. EL = 1.09 (COST. 301 INLET 045 EL =-1.09 (NEW 101 CUiIET NV.. EL = 1.09 (E70ST. 301 DETAIL NTS. 6 MI M4 RE E' sw 2110 ..N DAn REVISION A 5 APPROVED DA 014FT. 1r5V1510N JO 5701;6-02. Y Se 9ooy3 -o2_ PE RTIA1_ BOE/AW • FACILITIES DEPARTMENT D •n REV. EMI ❑ AUBURN, WA. 98002 ❑ EVERETT., •WA. 98201 ❑ KENT, - WA. 98031 O PORTLAND, OR 97220 O RENTON, WA. 98055 ® SEATTLE, WA. 98124 ACCEPTABILITY THIS DESIGN AND59 SPECIFICATION 15 .APPROVED DRAWN eV V W V .-P.w ONE0EED APNIOVED 17 rt SUOMI OIL / WATER SEPARATOR DETAILS wn 41 APPROVED MECHANICAL MASTER O r: -oll} DEVELOPMENTAL CENTS 2 • EAST REVISION Jb. No. wO NO. 109-000-4501 -_T C• CO.-1CCETC t.-1- >E_ A.1O CA:T •., • A•v L •CS I- A• EEc CA °? IE1 'C: CO.'.1CFETe. COVE= . 4.11' e-,c -„-1; 00,P•OE • AT LOT IT'D ACTON' xT•O. -t , Z o : C- F0cL C.7 \ /lv LIFT =JT A.JC _ _ •". -eE AP.s- -r Lr -.L4• • • � S- '-,w•JE. CC.,fC. CJK3 " ..0 -•TnE wo1.0 CJN1 'TYP, - :ET -EH C/ • F AP.1= • = Y/�J�1�' 1•LIII = r.ILv.�.N/ • :.f •• LtJ ,(, 1771. - rv— "; (2) v_E� -c• . klIkY :.JAL. /WAT=Rr' •ePAFZA OP :•H'— iUl,.. - r ,o. o EL- .J'F= .•a./ E- ti1.�, IrvJ E._ .,.:-F( ::-. E_•I:'..D•. GA �- • .1PV. Ip. "C' DATE . ` - B.D.. ' FACILITIES DEPARTMENT ;...ao.•'RATION &Pt{. VAJJL.T TI.'S ACCEPTABILfT1 THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED OIEAh'yJT�^ _ 9 E s eme(E _ r01L /WATER SEPARATOR DETAILS EAST REVISION Is.wwE own A ExTEho OIL MI/. _;D, ,; l I z,-'j ; 9 b v CMEIXw •I_ zozgD nM 'Soo APPROVED ST DER DATE "C' L MECHAN I L A DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER LIDO a%., 5'00 DIOOM° xseNO. 870193 1203 ADM 1100 - .- .. APPROV[D p • ,1< _ 1;300 ;Dm 1000 ,�;.• G -,o-aj. DVW NO 109-000- 453' 1- I00 PDA, • 1, -.o 6 -1 • 15 n' 7�.. /c" 2.swcah dMx.SEC) • -_L CF'u.' n• cID-: Ip PPM N kIC .- ErTh.726 at- Dl-••• n,SN A, j 1V /^ • MAJJ H Off_ ... -.�, •- .AA'• ls• 35. 0,' i • • En•, 5 i. 10=1- 0%, -11T.? - .1 >. ,3)40`eoL:`_a c7s _Ew-c 61T ")..p. ET •NE.n. • 12' .4.:• Er15TI••r-• - ot•_DAM. 1-"0E'30<l• DETAIL 10�.I JTf.,• svN REVISION ET APPROTED DAn MI EVO10V ST APPROVED DATE . ` - B.D.. ' FACILITIES DEPARTMENT ❑ AUBURN, WA. ❑.EVERETT, WA. ❑ KENT, WA. ❑ PORTLAND; OR. • ❑ RENTON, WA. i SEATTLE, WA. 98002 98201 98031 97220 98055 98124 .. ACCEPTABILfT1 THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED OIEAh'yJT�^ _ 9 E s eme(E _ r01L /WATER SEPARATOR DETAILS EAST REVISION Is.wwE own A ExTEho OIL MI/. _;D, ,; FJG I z,-'j ; 9 CMEIXw •I_ 6 SHEET - APPROVED ST DER DATE "C' L MECHAN I L A DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER DIOOM° xseNO. 870193 APPROV[D • ,1< _ APMOVED �� ,�;.• G -,o-aj. DVW NO 109-000- 453' a Eaw 81178 REV. 113