HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-333-86 - GREEN RIVER CONSTRUCTION - STORAGE YARD FENCEGREEN RIVER
CONSTRUCTION-
STORAGE YARD
SCREENING FENCE
MAULE AVE BETWEEN
S. 143RD PL & S. 143RD ST.
EPIC 333 -86
A F F I•A V IT OF D I S TR I n T 1 O N
I, Kathryn A. Stetson
0 Notice of Public Hearing
Q Notice of Public Meeting
0. Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet
0 Board of*Appeals Agenda Packet
[I Planning Commission Agenda Packet
[[ Short Subdivision Agenda Packet
hereby declare that:
® Determination of Nonsignificance
0 Mitigated Determination of Non -
significance
(� Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
0 Notice of Action
0 Official Notice
[E Notice of Application for ( J Other
Shoreline Management Permit
[[ Shoreline Management Permit 0 Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on
Washington State Department of Ecology
Environmental. Review Section
SEPA Division
MS PV -11
Olympia, WA 98504
Name of Project odku. vtJ l?:U. .) CBv1.40) .
File Number- CN' 10—Ig7 ( &PSG -
July 2, 1986,
G_____ 1. _I / /.I,.crl
Signature
CHOLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAIONGS
) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Federal Agencies
( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (Region X)
State Agencies
( ) WA.ST. OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
( ) WA.ST. TRANSPORTATION DEPT.
( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF FISHERIES
( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
( ) WA.ST. PLANNING & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AGENCY
( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES
( WA.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISIC
( A.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION
( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF GAME
( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
County Agencies
( ) K.C. DEPT. OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVEL.
( ) FIRE DISTRICT 18
( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
( ) K.C. HEALTH DEPARTMENT
( ) SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY
( ) RENTON LIBRARY
( ) KENT LIBRARY
( ) PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE
( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
( ) WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS
( ) WATER DISTRICT 75
( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
( ) GROUP W CABLE
( ) KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( ) TUKWILA BOARD uF ADJUSTMENT
( ) TUKWILA MAYOR
( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
( ) Public Works
( ) Parks and Recreation
( ) Police
( ) Fire
( ) Finance
( ) Planning /Building
( )FIRE DISTRICT 1
( )FIRE DISTRICT 24
( )K.C. BLDG & LAND DEVEL.DIV. -SEPA INFO CNTR
Schools /Libraries
( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY
Utilities
( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
( )VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT
( )WATER DISTRICT 20
( )WATER DISTRICT 25
( )WATER DISTRICT 125
( )UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
City Agencies
( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION
( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
( ) Edgar Bauch
( ) Marilyn Stoknes
( ) Joe Duffie
( ) Mabel Harris
( ) Charlie Simpson
( ) Doris Phelps
( ) Wendy Morgan
Other Local Agencies
( ) PUGET SOUND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT (PSCOG)
( ) PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
( ) TUKWILA /SEA TAC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Media
( ) DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
( ) RENTON RECORD CHRONICLE
( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIVISION
( )HIGHLINE TIMES
( )SEATTLE TIMES •
WAC 197 -11 -970
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal Storage yard screening fence
Proponent Green River Construction Co., Inc.
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any
Maule Avenue between S. 143rd P1 and S. 143 St.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 333 -86
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
jig There is no comment period for this DNS
El This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be,submitted by
. The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title Planning Director
Phone 433 -1845
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Date Signature `1
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
• CN 8(0-1.E5,7
EPIC - 33 -3(c,
FILE 86,-- 30- f
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: [] BLDG n PLNG ��_P W� r--1 FIRE__ "' �ln POLICE n P & R
PROJECT Jc�� LULU CLrLV
LOCATION% cuthAliii 3. /4-3 5. 143 PI. FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED J (o - 3 (O RESPO.NaSE REQUESTED -BY
STAFF COORDINATOR - ) 1 / 1 • a CL0.1 c ,(J
RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
NO Co 0 v)■)E
'2 is
oF
' s . /1-(3 ` Tr- s{J N o f2(s T C;uc�C J ►+`��,
DATE ee72 -78‘ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C 4In
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
CN - 36-1 fc7
EPIC - 333 -%
FILE $(0- 30" D�
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: [] BLDG C PLNG .I n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R
PROJECT 0A,LQ/YLJ K.LULU C ilh t)
LOCATION q,(,(.,Q. fJJiL /,5• / 4-3 SI-. S. /4 P/. FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED (D / 3 CD sRESPONSE- REQUESTED BY- 6 ' Q'Sip7
STAFF COORDINATOR 1 • ,g1& CI4.I1 &LW RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
no
DATE 6
COMMENTS PREPARED BY A/A6
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA • CN - g6-11,c7
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC " 35-8(0
FILE $(9— 30- D�
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: OlEkki Q PLNG n P.W. I FIRE In POLICE (i P & R
,�h
PROJECT A(,(..UL) K.[.�Ctu C r- ' , )
LOCATION WilA L /3. / .S. /4 p/• FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 6-R0160 rliPogCREQUESTED BY ` (; D' g t'
STAFF COORDINATOR 71'l. g & ctah CL(,v RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
&-
,DATE 1/0(o. COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•CN — g -(,Ec7
EPIC - 335-1(0
FILE $L- 30- 1)�
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: [::1 BLDG 0 PLNG (i P.W. POLICE n P & R
PROJECT 62 W ' iQ.,(,(,(Lu ( Z -Th/L)
LOCATION l 3 . %43 S • I4 p/. FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED (p - /(0 - 3 (o !RaES?PONSE REQUE *ST:EN-;BY.
STAFF COORDINATOR 11/ • gla CL J1CI LAJ RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
DATE
/(),-Q49
�e44.F�Q
I) 1 4 I Al ANN
&in* k".
all
ybad6 fie6.
oz
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P. . Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
CN—
86-1Ec7
EPIC - 333-%
FILE S(9— 30" D�
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: J BLDG ri PLNG (1 P.W. (l FIRE n POLICE ° P° &` R
PROJECT Jcli1Le ) kiike ( IVc)
LOCATION f S . /4-3 S*• S. /43 O, FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED (D - 16 - g (O 4(1E4- S'PONSE REQUEST.E =D'IBY a (� Z46- .,
STAFF COORDINATOR —M . g l& I CUAJ RESPONSE RECEIVED -n r-84,7
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
chvo
DATE v/v6e-
COMMENTS PREPARED BY b __
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: [] BLDG Q PLNG n P.W. - FIRE
PROJECT ,04.1.1.111U
LOCATION % cuthzwils. /43 5f. 3./43 P1. FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED (0 - RESPONSE_.REQUESTED -BY ----- _G '‘,71)' g-" I
STAFF COORDINATOR 7Y) • g/10 61- i1 C LU RESPONSE RECEIVED (o- 19- 10
•CN-86-/ 7
EPIC - 33-8(0
FILE
�_ _ L. ICE) OP &R
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
/UO 1,A." a kr fr. b O p roo(c1/7
<cP _c -,A.A'c 5, ` Sq- dre..)
DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
REN1"---
JUN ].11986
CITY OF TUKWiLA
PLANNING DEPT.
A. BACKGROUND
Con& No. 81-/87
Epic File No. P /c-3g3 -g(
[Fee51OO.0O]Receipt No. /20(0
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2. Name of applicant: gav � ° ,,s7f a. a.,,
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
'G..A4..4 Afh (.? j'(o —1�iS 6) �) Aka/ ti�d-o u
4. Date checklist prepared: C- -ii -g6
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ,,,,414,
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected wi h this proposal? If yes, explain.
Ofrfee/ aA
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Do Alf a/ow
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed' uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
4 -cia_2 4 4r e d ' Tom! I edte
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
./4o - . e /.ref c6► /¢.742eitt
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI•T • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one):
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, -`er
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope) ?��,
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. Ale_
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
Wm?
•
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other Impacts to the earth, if any:
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
AA)Mstde
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
c.. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
Ab0
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, plgase describe and attach
available plans. 0
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
ityu
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. {/
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge. N
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
, 6.4)4 •
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.)\ Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
i• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
C deciduous tree: alder, w'1<T!�r . aspen, other
ye evergreen tree: fir , pine, other
shrubs
_ grass
_ pasture
crop or grain
_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? /�qrS ,A1-/s/1-
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site. oNe
go
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
®41/s
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any: , -
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a.
What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, color) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any: 04er df-
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
1) Describe special emergency services, that might
be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
rocs -%
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
3) Proposed measures to r uce or control noise
impacts, if any:
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? 141
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
'TM 35- 474 rikr
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures demolished? If so, what?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? bli
f. What is the current comprehen ive plan designation
of the site? Liji k "7-4A441/..4/
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? 4/4 .
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
1. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any: 0 Of
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existin and projected land uses and
plans, if any:; 1- 9..1 � _2s /JQccf
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing ,
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing? /I__ti_
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing. --
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: I) 14
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) pro 74 osed ?
'1 11
- ,E R $',4
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstr'uu rcpt eed? Ag_
Proposed measures to red ce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any: fqe0.7
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
414
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal? droAfe
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Agritie
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
PQ
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
•
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on, or next to the site? If
so, generally describe-. pa
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
owe_
c. Proposed measur s to reduce or ontrol impacts, if
any: ,���1 / s� CP
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
7,4euto 4 /hey'- + mpyt194 ,r iesg_
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
• 0 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur. 0-A)&
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any: p*i-04-
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public servic,es, if any.
16. Utilities
a. Ci
t
ie
• Evaluation for
ly available at the site:
efuse service,
ectri
l tart'
septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete
my knowledge. I .erstand that the
relying.on them tc its decision.
AP
Signature:
Date Submitted:
to the best of
lead agency is
Agency Use Only
ReA66-
eiWNV 'tp ''FI(56 a�
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
0. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are:
III Evaluation for
Agency Use Wily
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether . the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• 411 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT ANO NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are th objecctive(s) of the proposal?
a *44 LGci / '" o4-
CAt4- - N
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
2-F-04417 74b.--Tar .4r -
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action: Pww cr.7
J
4 ..
•
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? Pb
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
1
-23-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
I
aS • •
Sd
�S 4' -1J<. _
X 2.5 3-.71" . fret 1„if
ell ?
•
“i<ef'#
CITY OF TUKWILA - Planning Department
APPLICATION TIMETABLE CHECKLIST
Project Fence
Location Maule Ave between S. 143 P1 & S. 143 St.
Pre - application meeting date
Pre -app. #
File #(s) 86 -30 -DR
SEPA # EPIC - 333 -86
Control # CN -86 -187
100.00 (EPIC)
Date application received 6/11/86 Fees S 60.00 Receipt # 1806
Kroll page Qtr- Sec- Twp -Rng Tax Lot #
GENERAL INFORMATION
Request BAR approval of screening fence
Description of project Provide screening fence around storage yard
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Contact Person Jerry Knudson Phone 242 -1409
Address 6421 S. 143 P1 Tukwila, WA Zip 98188
Property Owner Jerry Knudson Phone
Address same Zip
Contract Purchaser Phone
Address Zip
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS /DEADLINES
Notice publication deadline 6/13/86 Date published 6/15/86
Notice to property owners deadline 6/16/86 Date mailed 6/13/86
Notice posted on property deadline Date posted
Notice of Shoreline app. deadline 1st notice published
30 day comment period ends 2nd notice published
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Comment period: Yes No 15 day deadline from action
Date routed Due back All comments received
Additional information required
Date submitted
Date routed Due back All comments received
DNS issued Mitigated DNS issued EIS required Date
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT /PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting date(s) 6/26/86 Date of final action
Approved Approved with conditions Denied
Conditions
Appeal deadline Appealed: Yes No
Shoreline Permit sent to DOE Date DOE received
30 day appeal period ends
CITY COUNCIL
Hearing date assigned
Results of Hearing
Ordinance or Resolution assigned
(23 /ATC)
Effective date
74 LAND USE MAP UPDATED _ ZONING MAP UPDATED