HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-336-86 - CITY OF TUKWILA / PARKS AND RECREATION - FOSTER GOLF COURSE RENOVATIONFOSTER GOLF COURSE
REDEVELOPMENT
13500 INTERURBAN
AVE. S0.
EPIC 336 -86
•
jmETRD
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave., Seattle, Washington 98104
August 26, 1986
i3rad Collins
Planning Director
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
INIMEM
1AUG 2 8 1986
L.
CITY OF TUKV'v«A
PLANNING DEPT._
Determination of Non - Significance
City of Tukwila - Foster Golf.Course renovation.
Dear Mr. Collins:
Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the
following comments.
Water Quality
The project site is adjacent to Duwamish River which has
been designated by Metro as a major water body of regional
concern where the protection of water quality is a high
priority. Additionally, the Metro Council approved an
11 -point recommendation in the Duwamish Clean Water Plan
to promote the beneficial uses of the river. Consequently,
the renovation of the golf course should be made com-
patible with the Plan by undertaking mitigating measures
that will protect water quality, fishery resources and
the general beneficial uses of the river. In light of
this, Metro does recommend the following mitigating
measures which are not limited to:
- construction timing and staging;
- provision for maintaining adequate setbacks and
riparian vegetation;
- temporary erosion and sedimentaion controls;
- preventing toxic materials, petrochemicals and other
pollutants from entering the surface waters; and
- ensuring that public access to the river is not adversely
affected.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment.
Very truly yours,
Gregory M. Bush, Manager
Environmental Planning Division
GMB:Iaw
JACOB THOMAS
Director
STATE OF WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
111 West Twenty -First Avenue, KL -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753 -4011
July 28, 4.896
Mr. Brad Collins
Planning Director
Tukwila Planning Department
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
} JUL 29 19861
:ATV Or TuKAIViLA
PLANNING DEPT.
Log Reference: 802- C -KI -04
Re: Foster Golf Course Renovation
Dear Mr. Collins:
A staff review has been completed of your proposed declaration of
non - significance. In the event that archaeological or historic
resources are discovered during project activities, please notify the
Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washing-
ton.
dw
Sincerely,
Robert G. Whitlam, Ph.D.
State Archaeologist
(206) 753 -4405
ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER
Director
• a�sTerFOd
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000
July 22, 1986
Mr. Brad Collins
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mr. Collins:
13-.KOL-.
JUL 25 1986
CITY Dr `f UKv'VlLA
PLANNING DEPT.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of
nonsignificance for the Foster Golf Course renovation. We have reviewed
the checklist and have the following comments.
As noted in the checklist, a shoreline permit is required. This
proposal must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline
master program.
If you have any questions, please call Ms. Linda Rankin of our
Shorelands Division at (206) 459 -6763.
Sincerely,
Kai /e0)/ad el
Kari Rokstad Samuelson
Environmental Review Section
KRS:bjw
cc: Linda Rankin, Shorelands
RE:
TELEPHONE MEMO
K--33L-AC,
PERSON CONTACTED:n \II\L1LV\S
PERSON CALLING: f.44.—
DATE: <rcb1' `C, 19,,8Cz.
INFORMATION ITEMS:
itel v J r 0 f wi LL T5€ LO Me„
. 2 C `'S �( �
41/4341.NIRO r •
\LIALL lQD.
CHEIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAI•GS
Federal Agencies
( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION L u• ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (Region X)
\ State Agencies
( WA.ST. OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ,
( ) WA.ST. TRANSPORTATION DEPT.
( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF FISHERIES Q
( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
( ) WA.ST. PLANNING & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AGENCY
( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES
( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISIO
( ) WA.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION
) WA.ST. DEPT. OF GAME
( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
County Agencies
( ) K.C. DEPT. OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVEL.
( ) FIRE DISTRICT 18
( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
( ) K.C. HEALTH DEPARTMENT
( ) SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY
( ) RENTON LIBRARY
( ) KENT LIBRARY
( ) PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE
( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
( ) WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS
( ) WATER DISTRICT 75
( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
( ) GROUP W CABLE
( ) KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( ) TUKWILA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
( ) TUKWILA MAYOR
( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
( ) Public Works
( ) Parks and Recreation
( ) Police
( ) Fire
( ) Finance
( ) Planning /Building
( )FIRE DISTRICT 1
( )FIRE DISTRICT 24
( )K.C. BLDG & LAND DEVEL.DIV. -SEPA INFO CNTR
Schools /Libraries
( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY
Utilities
( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
( )VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT
( )WATER DISTRICT 20 �` \So
( )WATER DISTRICT 25
( )WATER DISTRICT 125
( )UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
City Agencies
( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION
( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
( ) Edgar Bauch
( ) Marilyn Stoknes
( ) Joe Duffie
( ) Mabel Harris
( ) Charlie Simpson
( ) Doris Phelps
( ) Wendy Morgan
Other Local Agencies
) PUGET SOUND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT (PSCOG) ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIVISION
PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Office /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more
) TUKWILA /SEA TAC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Residential 50 units or more
Retail 100,000 gsf or more
Media
( ) DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
( ) RENTON RECORD CHRONICLE
( )HIGHLINE TIMES
( )SEATTLE TIMES
WAC 197 -11 -970
• •
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal Foster Golf Course renovation of existing tees and greens,
addition of pedestrian pathways and a parking lot to 64 cars, construction of a
new clubhouse, small pond with bridge, and two parking areas for approximately
110 cars.
Proponent
City of Tukwila
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any east side of Interurban Ave. S.
and south of 56th Ave. S.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 336 -86
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
Q There is no comment period for this DNS
J This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
. The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title Planning Director
Phone 433 -1845
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Date ���'�( Signature
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
•
•
AQEW /
Tp6
t1� MGS.ee I•fe •'30 asMGAGT ..
__�� ____ f1 toe, __A a pYi6Til►1_:rAliV�i7illraini7 name'
ill A5 T4"R : RED E.VELOP 4' E/V/T
G- try .._OA . _ -77-1K)4/ / A '. :.PAAK3 Re GAGA "TLOA /
:FO 5 T E ..R .:. 6' o L f ,L I AI K.5_ _ a:ire&
.W /LL /A.1 '6- TCdfWL. AA/0 • ASSOC L A7" -' _'
LAN03GAG�'_- i._iAt.r_ 400/CS IL-AA cNruse. 3S: -:.: - - -•-
[:1[1W.N[11',
JUL u 1986
'CITY-OF
PLANNING DEPT ;I
• ,
41.772., £73 CCS/O/4,C.0
W'744.V.5/7YL.174:- ACES 5.•
to k,
• =EV
er, „....------:------- (-?•,,, A
._.„.,.„-^, .,-...._....,.... c • - _'----)
k ''''• ' -.:-%3;_.,., 2 r '''? <-." 1.j>
I. ''''''' ' - ,).-•
((\.-
/(4
snot', • L., ••••
er
\s.
\ • -
.‘-( s•••-•
acriem./ ePAIE
REP/NED PR,E4/41/MAR 6/C412/A/6. IZAN /i7R P Ged/C..5,E ,/'VAT//'J 6C-A4S1 7'm
/2, ',PG
Ad,.t es,sessr C,47 ls Rt.'', en •441.- 4 ,ptc
•
Ale71S0 Eri.feesalOce
111/771,4•45/7/4111AL AS1545
•
p-4•27E.S. 6. SC 6 • C./ Ty" W
1,/kGIrkv/ te, kliSe.S.A.7•ASS
IEMETU
JUL 8 1986
CF1Y OF TUK\MLA
PLANNING DEPT.
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
8(0.--a01
EPIC - 33t -8o
FILE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: 0 BLDG Q PLNG 0 P.W. Fl FIRE riOLICE P & R
PROJECT FQ u 661 W1g441
LOCATION /3500 L .12/WA GLAK &U 4) . FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED [9/30/Q6 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
STAFF COORDINATOR %m . i540y1m0,0 RESPONSE RECEIVED
7 /7 /fo
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
POLICE CONCERNS:
THIS EARLY IN THE PROJECT...NONE
HAVE DEVELOPERS WORK CLOSELY WITH THE CRIME PREVENTLON PRACTTONFER
TO PROVIDE A FACILITY THAT IS AESTHETICALLY PLEASING;CHALLENGING
TO THE GOLFER AND SECURE TO ALL USERS.
SECURITY PLANNED INTO THE FINISHED PRODUCT CAN BE HAD FOR 1/4
THE COST OF SECURITY WHEN PROJECT HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
** *PLANNING PLEASE PASS COMMENTS ALONG AS PER CPE FORM * **
7/7/86 pjl
DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
--1-4*CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
ON -g( -aQ
EPIC - 33(0-240
0 FILE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: (i BLDG ri PLNG FIRE n POLICE ri P & R
PROJECT r- oaf 661 CAL, etaucalslomu441,
LOCATION /3500 lAteALLACOO GU . 4). FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 6/30/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
STAFF COORDINATOR u. 64a_dQf (uk) RESPONSE RECEIVED
7/7/'('
DATE '
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
41 O- P f3 Go R.T c.T i t� i T) C731 .L . F P g, t)
LI I I LIT`-! PERINI.ITS
'P L 1 -T 2Y i s r - Th
CUL t ( 1
4-3 -P(-P,
F . c ), T2 _p_. 1 tzc, s w t LL T 7i- \ Vmit.)-V t=1 W 1A/ . :S ,
bL-1 MINT IT`1 FILL. T l I ftP 0 . /b k STOP
t-DD(' VDL P2�- sa\IEn
PN31 -0 ) (M Er ?I b LLUTA NTS NON 1-431VEk,
S7L-c•c■ FLO`Nr■ rP A (1 tZ-i `t nW1 - O 1 L_ ( '1/1A.1YRA
I' A ,11P. ',DN.\ V ( C�- AAAK.S1 S 1n16t.
"ID IZ\'n\ . u —1 �k IS P C .
I (oq —1'09 T2-y u 1 ■ 's. M t .S o-F e_axNN-P , ).) �' t�►edT .
1P Jr\ tic 1\S NP l0 (alp �,1 / S > LL ZZ(S. 11J CJ.� -1 h t
- t"I-1 -t.c T2 tv fl *∎) -'iM t g` .
--)/So COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
• CN -860 -a0I
EPIC -33(0-8
FILE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: n BLDG PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R
PROJECT Faot.¢,U 6 s ' .' Cpl tA,Q.. bctuktts-pmbytt
LOCATION 13500 I • 4o • FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 6/30/Q6 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
STAFF COORDINATOR u. 64abliajt) RESPONSE RECEIVED
7 /7 /glp
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMEN
�C /7 -2;// . 055. 2 Q .-oe
/q7, //. 666- S)
s Lc ye g
'‘71`;"‘"fr
toa
DATE
o °G
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
.OiTY''OF TUKWILA Control # g(o -aQ/
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - INFORM�ON TRANSMISSION REQUEST FORM •ermit/File # P/-33 6 -$(o
PROJECT F-Xtbk (> C!(Qtudp ietct, 4. ADDRESS /36Q0 tAiThiLiAZiNt) &W. ,k10
STAFF REVIEWER 111. 60J-dicta)
BELOW ARE COMMENTS THAT NEED TO BE TRANSPIITTED TO THE APPLICANT /DEVELOPER.
0
0
Q
Q
Q
El CPS Tech please contact applicant /developer
I contacted applicant /developer ()e \&RUJAI/1 S
(name) on
[i Please follow -up with me on my concerns by
1 I ( SC (date)
(date)
CPS FOLLOW -UP
[l Contacted applicant /developer by phone in writing on (date)
Distributed copy of letter to file #s:
comments-Site t1Jt S SUemill -711318(o j DI (SJSC \01114 YZLN 4 . SUff-tc_ISAQT
10r617 AP 121.A1 M.
Instructions: Transmit copy of completed form with any correspondence to staff person and
appropriate files.
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
•CN -8(0--_a01
EPIC -33(0-26
FILE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: BLDG n PLNG n P.W. ( ] FIRE n POLICE n P & R
PROJECT Falatt4J 6 eectuidtploplumt
LOCATION /3500 a4& au • .4(-) .
DATE TRANSMITTED (9/30/8(0
STAFF COORDINATOR WI. abh(t i
FILE NO.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
RESPONSE RECEIVED
7/7/g(0
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
q.,9€ .ye4
DATE 4,;(/„30/a COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
III CN-$(0 -aOI
EPIC -33(0-8(0
FILE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM:
TO: E] BLDG Q PLNG n P.W. FIRE Q POLICE [ P & R
PROJECT F6.dte..0 6 r ' ' Cla t u,a e) 0(11441
LOCATION /3500 cvt) ( . 4O. FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED (9/,3D/810 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 7 /7/g
STAFF COORDINATOR . fit% tJ,J RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
rei,,,rno„ �'h- �1 � o rrZ � � L,.
o_u_k a fie_ l v.. ,AtsO-ve,Q__
DATE
RC.
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
•
A. BACKGROUND
PJ L ) T
JUN 26 1986
CITY OF TLJKWILA
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Cont. No. CN -g( -20 1
Epic File No. EPIC- 53(0 (.
Fee $100.00 Receipt No.
IST
Master Redevelopment Proposal for
Foster Golf Links
2. Name of applicant: C itv of Tukwila
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person :7MT—Don Williams, ulrecfor
Parks and Recreation Department, City of Tukwila 433 -1843
4. Date checklist prepared: June 26, 1986
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Metro ETS -3D restoration of pipeline corridor 1986/1987
Phased Capital Inprovement Program for redevelopment of remainder of existing
golf course thru 1994 as funds are available for certain prioritized projects.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Proposed new clubhouse construction with related parking, service access and
landscapinq.and new maintenance cbmpl:ex.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
An EIS was completed for Metro Pipeline route with an Addendum on impact of pipe-
line thru Foster Golf Links,but does not inlcude evaluation of restoration of
golf course in wake of pipeline installation.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
no
• •
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Shorelines Permit, King County Surface Water Management /Flood Control Permit,
hauling and grading permits, building, electrical and plumbing permit thru
City of Tukwila Building Department, BAR review /approval.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
Proposed work involves redevelopment of existing 18 hole golf course ( 71 acrd site)
and includes restoration of Metro pipeTine corridor, new grass tees and greens,
fairway contouring, landscaping, lake /pond, renovated irrigation system, and
new parking areas
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of -the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
13500 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
yes
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
flat, gently undulating
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? 2:1 river bank
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
alluvial sandy loam
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
no
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling gradin proposed. Indicate
source of fill. 7,5,:QOO cubic yards for strategic and aesthetic
:contouring of golf course. Sources are borrow from pipeline
installation. oh site cuts and fills, and imported fill material.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
P•ss .. •o . . - o so' s • k.'
bare exposed ground under construction and the seasonal
timing of construction.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
less than 1%
411 411 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
Erosion control barriers /siltation fences, angle of repose
for exposed slopes, seasonal timing of construction.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
short term during construction possible dust /wind
erosion. No long term residual impacts.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
no
c. Proposed . measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
minimize extent of exposed earth .surTaces at any one
time that is practical. Operation irrigation sy t
with active water source during construction. Seeding
and turf establishment.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
Duwamish River /Elliot Bay
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe, and attach
available plans. Redevelopment of existing tees
and greens maximizing utilization and aesthetics
of site.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material. Approximatley 6,000 cu. yds.
equally divided in three locations within the upper
wetland area of the 100 year flood plane.(indicated on
site plans). Sources are pipeline spoils and
imported fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
no .
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
yes
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
no
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground: ,
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities,.if known.
Irrigation water supply is drawn trom uuwamish River.
Water will be discharged to ground water during
seasonal operation of irrigation system from runoff
and infiltration.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
none
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
storm runoff from impervious surfaces will discharge
into grass lined swale /bio- filter prior to outfall
in Duwamish Rjy. r Has__DOE'and Fish r_ies approval.
• + Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
no change over existing condition
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
none required
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on- the
site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
77 grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other .
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? Some minor removal of Cottonwood trees and
coniferous trees as adversely affect turf propag fi5n.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
none
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: additional plantings of nouglas Fir,
11PCtern Red f'Pdar, native deridunut trppc and flnwPring
ornamental trPP", Red oak Street trees, Rhndndendrons,
laying
. 1 1 . . S . • -
111 -1
areas of the golf rnursp_
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
none
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any: additional In antinT of native trees and .Shrubs
will enhance potential wildlife habitat
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
no change/ electrical power supply for automatic
irrigation system.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
no
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any: more efficient irrigation system
will minimize total water consumption tor optimum
turf propagation..
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
none
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
none
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
none
0 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
Interurban traffic is not totally compatable
with the game of golf which requires a passive
environment.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
short term during construction from earth moving
equipment, traffic and access.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any: short term would be to control
hours of construction. long term thru installation
of earth contouring and landscaping.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
Recreational open space /golf course, light industrial,
commercial and residential
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
no
c.
Describe any structures on the site.
Existing clubhouse, maintenance building, cart storage
building, residence and garage.
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
existing maintenance building
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? C-2, R -A
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Parks and Open Space
9.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? 200'. shoreline impact
zone, 100 year flood plane.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
yes, shoreline and 100 year flood plane
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
10 full time /10 seasonal part—Time
Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace? none
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
none required
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
no change in usage from existing designations
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income
housing?
N/A
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing.
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
none proposed
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts,, if any:
Ae$.thetics are being enhanced through recontour.ing
and landscaping of the golf course
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
Lights are proposed for new parking areas.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
no
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
none
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
Proper engineering and spacing of standards; planting
of street trees to minimize off site impact.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
River Outlook Park, Interurban Pedestrian /Bikeway trail
system, Foster Athletic Park
0
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
no
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Thru redevelopment and restoration of the golf course we
are adding to its park like character, its safety and
strategic playibility and aesthetics thus rendering
a more competitive a16 successful facility.
-14-
• .Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
o,A generally describe.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
ALL A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
none required
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Course will continue to operate from.existing entrance
via Interurban Avenue South
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
yes, approxlmdttely 150 feet
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
23f1 (12n nver existing)
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
no
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
no
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
approximately 400 -500. Peak periods during noon time
with additional restaurant concession usage. Golfers
are uniformly distributed throughout day.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
more directly recognizable entrance and efficient
parking ingress /egress and storage.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
no
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
N/A
• • Evaluation for
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
*,electricity, *,patural gas,* *water, *,refuse service,
**telephone, *.unitary sewer, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
renovated irrigation system, continued usage of
electrical supply for system operation
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
2 C., /W'iS
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
Restore the golf course in wake of Metro pipeline installation
and to enhance playibility, challenge, safety and aesthetics for
the remainder of the golf course. To improve its park like
character and render it more competitive and financially
successful facility in an ever demanding market place.
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
Limit work to restoration of the pipeline corridor only.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
Exercizinq the alternative option would be to create a
golf course with two personalities; the existing status
quo vs. restored corridor. The existing status quo lacks
golf course amenities that are desired in today's market
place. Current proposal calls for making improvements
within the framework of a CIP for annual projects and
expenditures as funded by revenues generated through its
own operation.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila.
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? No
All work has previously been reviewed and adopted within
the framework of the City's Park and Open Space Mari which
is a part of the comprehensive Land Else Policy Plan.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
none required
-23-