Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-339-86 - KIEWET PACIFIC COMPANY - FILLKIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY FILL FROM I -90 EXCAVATION 12514 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH EPIC 339 -86 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor July 24, 1986 Attn: SEPA Information Center Building and Land Development Division 431 King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Scoping Notice for Kiewit Fill, King County File No. 2760 -33 Thank you for the opportunity to comment. The Planning Department would like to be kept apprised of this project. You are urged to contact the City Public Works Department regarding the feasibility of any potential primary or alternative truck routes in Tukwila; especially as it may affect Metro construction along Interurban Avenue and small bridges. Sincerely, Vernon M. Umetsu Associate Planner File: CN -86 -243 (EPIC- 339 -86) King County Building 6+ Land Development Division Department of Planning and Community Development 45(1 Ring County Administration Bldg. 500 fourth Avenue Seattle. Washington 98104 DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND SCOPING NOTICE Effective Determination Date: July 22, 1986 File: 2760 -31 Proponent: Kiewit Pacific Company, Al Corke Description of Proposal: A grading permit to fill 16.5 acres in two phases with about 300,000 cubic yards of material from I -90 excavation. Location: 12514 Pacific Highway South, between Pacific Highway South and 34th Avenue South. Based on an appeal of a mitigated determination of nonsignificance (issued March 25, 1986) for the project the Hearing Examiner determined the proposal likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) is required.wnder RCW 32.21C.020(c) and will be prepared. The environmental documentation for the project review may be viewed at our office. Significant impacts identified pursuant to WPC 197 -11 -444 include the following topics: 1. Earth - The types and characteristics of materials used for fill should be discussed. Changes in topography and soil stability impacts should be identified and discussed. Mitigating measures to control impacts should be identified. 2. Water - Impacts of filling and grading operations on Mill Creek should be discussed and mitigating measures identified. Particular attention should be given to any probable impacts on fisheries in the Creek. 3. Environmental Health - The impacts of increased noise, dust, odor and glare on the surrounding community should be discussed and possible mitigating measures disclosed. 4. Land Use - a. Probability of induced land use changes resulting from topographical alterations should be identified and mitigating measures discussed. b. The impact of filling on sunlight reaching surrounding properties should be discussed and mitigating measures identified. 5. Transportation - The impact of large vehicles on the public transportation system in this area should be examined. Truck routes, numbers of vehicles and possible traffic improvements should be identified and discussed. Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope (content of the EIS),. Comments well be accepted in writing only. Written comments on the scope of the EIS must be filed within 21 days from the above determination date. • Comments should be addressed to: A'ITN: SEPA Information Center Building and Land Development Division 431 King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 344 -5299 Signature of Responsible Official or Desio ee: