Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-34-88 - ESM INC / STARBOW BUILDERS - TUKWILA JUNCTION REZONETUKWILA JUNCTION REZONE & NEW SUBDIVISION WITH SINGLE FAMILYLOTS 14915 57T" AVE. S. EPIC 34 -88 CI1 OF TUKWILA M FAX TRANSMITTAL FAX NUMBER: (206) 433 -1833 TO: VALLEY DAILY NEWS DATE: May 12, 1989 (Friday) TITLE: FROM: COMPANY: TITLE: DEPARTMENT: LEGAL NOTICES DIVISION DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FAX NO. 854 -1006 TOTAL NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: 2 SENT BY (INITIALS): WB `1 . alto . - 'GP. \.^N)l:rryyiG•::sNA:i':biie. \\\ .4\kw \'06h \..x... \Y:`...'v'••...: C:•.`:::`C:: SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES COMMENTS /MESSAGE: PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE VALLEY DAILY NEWS IN THE LEGAL NOTICES DIVISION ON SUNDAY, MAY 14, 1989. :.SK{� -`i }CAA: \:'.M..w..81 k4C' t: �xC Y3:}: H \'NN.H3.43..°.�dRR2A�ii0`iG4�. �t��W'.'.a2 - -:} }�y ': kC:.'•A::9?t:::r < »:`>;c. . -. .QcTS��.COHtfiR6C3NGUSi"_ IF THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT CLEARLY RECEIVED, PLEASE CALL: Wendy at 433 -1849 TUKWILA CITY HALL - 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 - (206) 433 -1800 03/24/89 0 A•FIDAVIT OF DIS•IBUTION I, Wendy Bull hereby declare that: Q Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of AppealvAgenda Packet E] Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit • Shoreline Management Permit Ei Determination of Nonsignificance C7 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [[ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice E] Notice of Action [l Official Notice E1 Other E] Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Friday, May 12, 1989. SEE ATTACHED: FAXED TO VALLEY DAILY NEWS ON FRIDAY, MAY 12, 1989. APPLICANT ESM, Inc. Name of Project Tukwila Junction File Number EPIC -34 -88 , 19 . ' WAC 197 -11 -970 • • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Request for rezone from R -1 12.0 to R -1 7.2. ( Determination applies only to the rezone). Proponent ESM .Inc . Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 14915 57th AvP S Lead Agency: City of- Tukwila File No. EPIC- /EPIC - 34- 88 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. El There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukw i Signature Phone 433 -1846 - .;18; You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.ONS •i,'�. CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAILINGS !/���/1,� ( ) ( ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( )U.S. Department of H.U.D. (Region X) WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department ( ) Department of Fisheries ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) Planning & Community Affairs Agency ) ) ) KING Dept. of Planning & Community Devel. Fire District 18 Boundary Review Board Health Department ( ) South Central School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Pacific Northwest. Bell Telephone ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Washington Natural Gas ( ) Water District 75 ( ) Seattle Water Department ( ) Group W Cable ) Kent Planning Department ) Tukwila Board of Adjustment ) Tukwila Mayor Tukwila City Departments: ) - Public Works - Parks and Recreation ) - Police ) - Fire - Finance ) - Planning /Building )Dept. of Social and Health Services ept. of Ecology, Shorelands Division Dept. of Ecology, SEPA Division * )Department of Game )Office of Attorney General * Send checklist with all determinations COUNTY AGENCIES )Fire District 1 )Fire District 24 )Building & Land Development Division SEPA Information Center SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( )Highline School District ( )King County Public Library ( )Seattle Municipal Reference Library UTILITIES CITY )Puget Sound Power & Light )Val -Vue Sewer District )Water District 20 )Water District 25 )Water District 125 )Union Pacific Railroad AGENCIES )Renton Planning Department )Tukwila Planning Commission Tukwila City Council Members: ( )- Edgar Bauch ( )- Marilyn Stoknes ( )- Joe Duffie ( )- Mabel Harris ( )- Charlie Simpson (. )- Jim McKenna ( )- Wendy Morgan OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ) ) ) Puget Sound Council of Government(PSCOG) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce MEDIA ) Daily Journal of Commerce Renton Record Chronicle METRO Environmental Planning Division Office /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more Residential 50 units or more Retail 100,000 gsf or more ( )Highline Times ( )Seattle Times TUWAY MESSAGE TO ,C/1 FROM 1„),Mezz,726-0,e) i/L l/J 9- /3, /59 e—,5 /27 $4'7/2? e:~medobz c„.6 *350e iy9k4- :20) s G'7 /1" /4 /WI 62 2,7 �al/// /Jt A �. jri'�/ �S ee 6 /fie,6 E P L ■ DATE: ASSOCIATED L1•A2375 SIGNED J PRINTED IN U.S.A. ESM inc. M A CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEY, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM May 10, 1989 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Rick Beeler, Planning Director RE: Tukwila Junction Rezone (88 -6 -R) Environmental Review (EPIC - 34 -88) Dear Rick: Job No. 366 -04 -880 In accordance with your request, this letter shall serve as a clarification of information for the Environmental Checklist prepared for the Rezone Application of the Tukwila Junction Rezone (88 -6 -R) and Environmental Review (EPIC -34- 88). The following information should be incorporated into the Environmental Checklist: 1. Sanitary sewer is available in the vicinity of the project (at the east end of S. 150th St.) directly adjacent to the site. 2. A sanitary sewer main line extension will be necessary for future development of the site and will require the acquisition of an easement across the westerly boundary of the adjacent property owner to the north. 3. An easement for extension of a domestic water line to connect with an existing water line in S. 150th may also be necessary for future development. However, existing water service is available at the easterly project boundary. This additional information should clear up any confusion about the availability of water and sewer to the project and allow you to issue a determination of non - significance for the rezone application. 941 Powell Avenue S.W. Suite 100 • Renton, Washington, 98055 • (206) 228 -5628 • Mr. Rick Beeler May 10, 1989 Page Two If this information is not in accord with our phone conversation this morning, or if you have any questions please feel free to call. Sincerely, ESM, INC. BRET CUMMOCK Project Manager cc: Walt Schaefer, Starbow Builders, Inc. Brad Decker, Mustang Investment Corp. n9 /bc92 i F;TsI;F 2qr��,����1� ENVIRONNIENEAL �n, rl, n iii v IST ( APR 131989 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: TUKWILA JUNCTION City of Tukwila. Washington i 2. Name of applicant: Starbow Builders, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: Bret A. Cummock Starbow Builders, Inc. ESM, INC 31849 Pacific Hwy S. #141 -M 941 Powell Ave. SW, #100 Federal Way. WA 98003 Renton, WA 98055 839 -0366 228 -5628 4. Date checklist prepared: April 13, 1989 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The rezone is proposed to be completed in the Spring of 1989. A Preliminary Plat application is anticipated to be submitted subsequent to approval of the rezone application. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansions. or farther activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain. Yes, a Preliminary Plat for a single family residential subdivision is anticipated to be submitted after completion of the rezone application. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A traffic study has been prepared by David Hamlin and Associates. A geotechnical study is anticipated to be prepared in conjunction with the preliminary plat application which is anticipated to be submitted subsequent to the completion of the rezone application 2 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Tukwila rezoning approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this fors to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal is for the rezoning of a parcel of R -1 -12.0 zoned property with a total site area of 3.81 acres more or less to R -1 -7.2 zoning. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address. if any. and section, township, and range. if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area. provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan vicinity sap. and topographic sap. if reasonably available. While you should =bait any plans required by the agency. you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site lies on the West side of 57th Avenue South beginning approximately 1020 feet South of the intersection of 57th Avenue South and South 147th Street. Legal Description: Parcel B. City of Tukwila short plat number 84-20 - SS, recorded under recording number 8407190829. said short plat being a subdivision of a portion of lots 19 and 20, Brookvale Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 47. in King County, Washington. TOGETHER WITH: That portion of lot 20 and the South 8 feet of lot 19. Brookvale Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 47, in King County, Washington. lying Westerly of the Westerly Boundary of parcels A and B of City of Tukwila short plat number 84- 20-SS, recorded under recording number 8407190829. • • 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat. rolling. hilly. steep slopes, mountainous. other. Variable slopes to 25Z +. Average slopes are approximately 10 -15Z. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 25Z+ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. clay. sand, gravel. peat. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland? Site is underlain by UR Urban Land Soils based upon the USDA soil survey maps. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. None noted on site. e. Describe the purpose. type. and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No construction work is proposed in conjunction with the rezone application. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? If so, generally describe. N/A About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? g• N/A h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth. if any: N/A a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile. odors, industrial mood snake) daring construction and mien the project is completed? If any. generally describe and give approximate quantities, if blown. N/A b. Are there any offs -site sources of emissions or odor that nay affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known c. proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: N/A 3. WATER a. Surface 1) Is there any surface mater body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that mould be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal - require surface water witbdrawls or diversions? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No • 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system. the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water floe? Will this water flaw into other waters? N/A 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A 4. PLANTS 6 a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder. maple. aspen. or other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar. pine. other X shrubs Z grass pasture crop or grain vet soil plants; cattail. buttercup, bullrnsh, skunk cabbage, other water plants: eater lily. eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. Nbat kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rabbits,Cdent) fish: bass. salmon. trout. herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so. explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil, mood stove. solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it mill be used for beating, manufacturing, etc. - N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A c. What other kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: None 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REALM a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion. spill. or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so. describe. N/A 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if anY: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment. operation, other)? Traffic noise from I -5 will not have an impact on the proposed rezone and is anticipated to have minimal impact on any future development. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-tern or a long -term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation, other)? Indicate wbat hours noise mould come from the site. N/A 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: None. • • 8 8. LAND AND 3808 LINI USD a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently a large tract of ground with two single family residences; surrounding uses are single - family residential to the north and east, apartments to the west, vacant land to the south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Possibly as pasture for horses, etc. c. Describe any structures on the site. Two older single family residences. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not as part of the rezone application. However, the existing residences are anticipated to be demolished by future development. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R -1 -12.0, per the City of Tukwila and is proposed to be rezoned to R -1- 7.2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? City of Tukwila comprehensive plan designates the area as single family residential, the current zoning is R -1 -12.0 per the City of Tukwila 8. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as uenvironmentally sensitive" area. If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project. N/A j. Approximately bow many people would the completed project displace? N/A k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: None 9 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans. if any: 9. The proposed rezone is in accord with the existing zoning and land use of the surrounding neighborhoods DOUSING a. Approximately how any units mould be provided. if any? Indicate whether high. middle. or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units. if any. would be eliminated? Indicate whether high. middle. or low - income bossing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any. None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal ezterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any: N/A 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known 10 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts if any: N/A 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Fort Dent Park. Tukwila Park b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic. archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None proposed 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Existing street serving the site is 57th Avenue South b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Transit service is available along Interurban Avenue and shuttle service is available along Macadam Road. 11 c. Bow many parking spaces would the completed project have? Hoe away would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) eater. rail. or air transportation? If so. generally describe. No f. Bow many vehicular trips per day mould be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: None 15. PUBLIC SUBIC'S a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection. police protection. health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. Not as part of the proposed rezone. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any: N/A 16. UTILITIES a. Circle u ilities cu available at the site: trici tnral �ti r"i,.*"T -? tare sewer sem►tic sv em. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or is the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None •■, • C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and understand that the Signature: leery U Date Submitted: 4.1 ec /tj 12 complete to the beet of .7 knowledge. I is relying on them to make its decision. • • Da)nad oa K @cmoaim a000eadAGo traffic design transportation planning 1022 Yale Avenue North April 7, 1989 Seattle, Washington 98109 (206) 340 -0835 ESM, Inc. 941 Powell Avenue SW - Suite 100 Renton, WA. 98055 ATTN: Bret Cummock Subject: Traffic Impacts Associated with Proposed Plat of Tukwila Junction, Tukwila, WA. (88 -1 -SUB) Dear Mr. Cummock: The purpose of this letter is to identify the traffic related impacts associated with the proposed Plat of Tukwila Junction. The information which follows should provide the City of Tukwila staff with the information necessary to complete the review of the project. Project Description The proposed project is for the development of a 17 lot plat on roughly 4 acres within the City of Tukwila. The plat is located on the west side of 57th Avenue S. at S. 150th Place. The site is currently occupied by two older residences. The existing zoning of the site is R -1 -12 which is proposed to be rezoned to R- 1 -7.2. Access to the plat would be from 57th Avenue S., with a future connection to the north from the interior of the plat. A vicinity map is shown on Figure 1. Existing Roadway Conditions The proposed plat will be served by a variety of residential streets prior to entering the arterial network. 57th Avenue S. is a local access street which will provide access to the plat. The roadway is approximately 22 feet in width between S. 144th Street and S. 147th Street with some areas widened out on the west side of the street to allow parking. The section of roadway south of S. 147th Street is approximately 28 feet wide with parking allowed on the west side of the street. Just south of the proposed plat access the roadway narrows roughly ten feet on the east side to accommodate access to a single - family residence. Jersey barrier has been • • installed along the narrowed section. Curb, gutter and sidewalk have been installed along the roadway. The roadway is fronted by single - family dwellings. S. 144th Street is two -lane collector street fronted by single - family dwellings. The roadway is approximately 36 'feet in width with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lights. A centerline has been marked and on- street parking is allowed on both sides of the street. S. 144th Street crosses over I -5 and provides access to SR -99. 58th Avenue S. /62nd Avenue S. /S. 151st Street /65th Avenue S. is a meandering arterial roadway through the neighborhood which provides a connection to Southcenter Boulevard. The roadway is approximately 36 -40 feet in width with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The roadway is characterized by both horizontal and vertical curves. The posted speed is 25 mph. An AM and PM peak hour traffic count was conducted at the intersection of S. 144th Street /57th Avenue S. for this study. The results of the counts show very light volumes of traffic at this intersection as was the case at other adjacent intersections which were visible during these same time periods. A summary of these counts has been attached. Based on the PM peak hour counts, it is estimated that the average daily traffic volume on S. 144th Street is in the range of 1800 vehicles per day. The average daily traffic volume on 57th Avenue S. is estimated to be in the range of 150 vehicles per day. Trip Generation /Distribution The development of the subject site will generate additional traffic onto the adjacent transportation system. The ITE Trip Generation Manual (published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 4th Edition, 1987) has been used to estimate the number of trips which can theoretically be expected to be generated by a development of this type. ITE Land Use Code 210 - Single Family Detached Housing, was chosen as the appropriate trip rate to be used for this development. The following table shows the number of trips expected to be generated by the development based on the number of lots. TRIP GENERATION (17 LOTS) indicated a concern with regards to the capacity of 57th Avenue South. The intersection is currently controlled by a stop sign for traffic in the north -south direction. !! "Level of service" is a common term used in the Traffic Engineering profession which is defined as a qualitative • • measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and its perception by motorists and /or passengers. These conditions are usually described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are designated, ranging from A to F, with level of service "A" representing the best operating conditions and level of service "F" the worst. The first step in the capacity analysis of an existing intersection is to manually count all of the traffic movements during the critical peak -hour period(s). A manual traffic count was conducted during the AM and PM peak hour at the intersection noted above. The intersection is then analyzed, taking into account all of the physical features and methods of traffic control. This process produces a rating for the intersection that defines a "level -of- service" for each vehicle. An expanded explanation of "level of service ", along with the tables which identify the criteria for analyzing unsignalized intersections, as presented in the Highway • Capacity Manual, has been provided in the Appendix. The actual capacity of an intersection is generally considered to be at the lower end of level of service "E" and most agencies strive to maintain a roadway network that will not drop below this level of operation, except perhaps during unusual periods such as holiday shopping, sporting events, etc. The following shows the current levels of service. EXISTING PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE RESERVE LOCATION PERIOD MOVEMENT LOS CAPACITY 57th Avenue S./ AM EB * - S. 144th Street WB * - NB A 953 SB A 913 PM EB A 1085 WB A 1117 NB A 831 SB A 902 * No left -turns recorded during the time period. The results of the analysis show that all of the movements are operating at level of service "A" during both the AM • • and PM peak hour. Due to the low volume of traffic on both the main street and the side street, plenty of gaps are available which result in the high levels of service. The levels of service were reviewed again for future conditions (1991) upon completion of the plat. The base volumes at the intersection were increased by 10% per year to account for general background growth in the area. The trips from the proposed plat were then added into these volumes. (Future volume estimates have been attached.) The results of the capacity analyses with and without the project were as follows: FUTURE PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 57TH AVENUE S. /S. 144TH STREET* TIME PERIOD AM PM LEVEL OF SERVICE (R.C.) MOVEMENT BASE CONDITION W /PROJECT EB A (1140) A (1140) WB A (1138) A (1135) NB A (935) A (930) SB A (907) A (903) EB A (1061) A (1061) WB A (1100) A (1092) NB A (805) A (818) SB A (853) A (847) * Unsignalized levels of service shown for most critical movements. The results of the capacity analyses for the future levels of service are similar to the existing conditions, i.e., all of the movements will operate at levels of service "A ". The additional trips resulting from the development of the plat will create only a minor impact. OTHER CONCERNS The City of Tukwila staff has raised concerns with regards to the roadway capacity on 57th Avenue South, the narrow sections on 57th Avenue South, and the jersey barrier on 57th Avenue South. Typically, roadway capacity in an urban area is determined at intersections which are controlled by a stop sign or traffic signal. Two intersections along 57th Avenue South between the plat entrance and S. 144th Street are stop sign controlled, the first at S. 147th Street and the second at S. 144th Street. The intersection of S. 144th • • 5 Street /57th Avenue S. was analyzed above and found that arterial with speeds in the 35 to 45 mph range. The narrowing of the roadway has assisted in lowering the speeds along the roadway. The final concern deals with the jersey barrier on the east side of 57th Avenue South. The barrier extends southward from roughly the plat entrance. The barrier has been installed along a narrow section of 57th Avenue S. to protect motorists from a steep drop -off into an adjacent Attachments KRYN MAWR SKYWAY ! t X1,.1 __,641. ISIS? 64 . 11.1. .I SEATTLE- TACOMA rTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PORT OF SEATTLE) • 1 WosA090on P.M io.ol Po.. 1 j !I76,M ,ii T 1641• $ s I6Soo ® 1y SIWM iCN1LH 117 —'if lu 61 1.dIT •� Inc 515 57 trot. 64 1• .I .T M MD 64 I.1..17000 1 um a 17610 64. .1/6714 64 .: 1! . u+ N •I. °[I PROJECT VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 . 144714 ST. 57TH AVE. PROJECT SITE SR-518 ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND DAILY TRIP ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 2 PROJECT SITE SR-518 XX - AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (XX) - PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS ESTIMATED AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT . FIGURE 3 Level -of- service D represents high- density, but stable, flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver or pedestrian experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this level. - Level -of- service E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedestrian to "give way" to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration is generally high. Operations at this level are usually unstable, because small increases in flow or minor perturbations within _ the traffic stream will cause breakdowns. effectiveness," and represent those available measures, that best describe the quality of operation on the subject • The level of service for a four -way stop controlled intersection is not as well- defined as other forms of control. The following three tables show the capacity for a • four -way stop and approximate level of service "C" volumes for four -way stop - controlled intersections. CAPACITY OF TWO -BY -TWO LANE FOUR- WAY'STOPCONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS DEMAND SPLIT CAPACITY (VPH)* 50/50 1900 55/45 1800 60/40 1700 65/35 1600 70/30 1500 * Total Capacity, All Legs CAPACITY OF FOUR-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS WITH 50/50 DEMAND SPLIT FOR VARIOUS APPROACH WIDTHS INTERSECTION TYPE CAPACITY (VPH)* 2 -lane by 2 -lane 1900 2 -lane by 4 -lane 2800 4 -lane by 4 -lane 3600 * Total Capacity, All Legs APPROXIMATE LEVEL -OF- SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR -WAY STOP - CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS DEMAND SPLIT 50/50 55/45 60/40 65/35 70/30 LOS C SERVICE VOLUME, VPH NUMBER OF LANES 2 BY 2 1200 1140 1080 1010 960 2 BY 4 1800 1720 1660 1630 1610 4 BY 4 2200 2070 1970 1880 1820 • AM PEAK HOUR S. 144TH STREET 87 SETH AVENUE 8. 4 44E- 2 8 43 42 W Z W PM PEAK HOUR ti N S. 144TH STREET 174 184E- s7 N 41 41 :14 116 ±-2 96 1 5 78 61 4 96 1 2 ±1 4 18 14 COUNT DATE: APRIL 4. 1989 (PM) APRIL 5. 1889 (Am) -.49 N 98 166 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES S. 144TH STREET /57TH AVENUE S. • • • 55 AM PEAK HOUR S. 144TH STREET E•s 108 57TH AVENUE S. 119 53 51 co; W 2 W cc PM PEAK HOUR ti S. 144TH STREET H 211 126 F- N 3+7 14 :19 E-s —)60 N 6 85 74 5 2 3+2 7 13 20 112 H 203 79 1991 ESTIMfTED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES - BASE CONDITIONS S. 144TH STREET /57TH AVENUE S. • • AM PERK HOUR S. 144TH STREET 57TH AVENUE S. 5 ?4— 1 :13 2 +2 3 54 51 N W 2 W PM PERK HOUR n S. 144TH STREET H 214 • N 50 53 4 511 28 $27 :22 10 6 87 74 7 H - -s 64 N 116 129 11 2 4 +4 10 20 130 -3.81 11? 210 1991 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES - WITH PROJECT S. 144TH STREET /57TH AVENUE S. • INTERSECTION : S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. WEEKDAY AM PEAK UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST DA ID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES • 4/5/1989 AT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION XAS144 ;q Ate' 5, \944~ S* / gi t ' Av Q . 1989 CBD ?N S. U N S I G N A L I Z E D C R I T I C A L G A P S CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 5.00 WB 5.00 NB 6.50 6.00 5.50 SB 6.50 6.00 5.50 APP EB WB NB SB V O L U M E A L L O C A T I O N LANE 1 L T R 0 0 2 1 • 42 1 41 0 3 6 2 1 LANE 2 L T T O L A N E S LANE 3 R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP EB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE WB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE NB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - EB /1 LANE 1 953 A 913 A LANE 2 LANE 3 • INTERSECTION : S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4/5/1989 •LAT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION • XAS144 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 1989 CBD ?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST T R A F F I C & R O A D W A Y C O N D I T I O N S GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS FED BUTTON ARR APP ( %) (7.) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds /hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -4 0 N 0 0 0.90 . 0 N 0.0 WB 4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 - SB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 AF'F' LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 42 1 LTR 1 16.0 WB 0 41 0 LTR 1 16.0. NB 2 3 6 LTR 1 11.0 SB 1 2 1 LTR 1 11.0 INTERSECTION : S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4/5/1989 �AT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION • XPS144 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1989 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST S , V44k CBD ?N wr 51+`" Av e, 5. U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP EB WB NB SB LEFT TURN 5.00 5.00 6.50 6.50 C R I T I C A L G A P S CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) THROUGH RIGHT TURN 6.00 6.00 5.50 5.50 APP EB WB NB SB V O L U M E A L L O C A T I O N LANE 1 L T R t) P.)CRU1 61 96 1 1 4 1 1 6 LANE 2 L T T O L A N E S LANE 3 R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP EB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE WB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE NB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - EB /WB • LANE 1 1085 A 1117 A 831 A 902 A LANE 2 LANE 3 • DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4/5/1989 •AT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION • XPS144 INTERSECTION : S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE a ENUE S. C II57TH AVENUE S. WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1989 CBD ?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST & R O A D W A Y C O N D I T I O N S GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS FED BUTTON ARR APP (X) (X) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds /hr) Y/N SEC TYPE ,EB -4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 WB 4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 1 1 �J (4 ;d (:•J 1 1 G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD 'MVM SLNS WD EB 5 61 4 LTR 1 16.0 WB 5 96 1 LTR 1 16.0 NB 2 1 1 LTR 1 11.0 SB 2 1 6 LTR 1 11.0 T R A F F I C • • =a U N S I G N A L I Z E D . MAJOR INTERSECTION : S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. DAVID I. HAMLIN & •AT OF TUKWILA WEEKDAY AM PEAK 1991 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST ASSOCIATES JUNCTION • CBD ?N 4/5/1989 FAS144 Ivor -� 5� \4A S }/ ,s-i it\V Q . S, APP EB WB NB SB C R I T I C A L G A P S CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN 5.00 5.00 6.50 6.50 6.00 6.00 5.50 5.50 APP EB WB NEB SB V O L U M E A L L O C A T I O N LANE 1 - L T R 1 51 1 1 50 1 3 4 7 2 3 2 LANE 2 L T T O L A N E S LANE 3 R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APP EB WB NB U N S I G N A L I Z E D • RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 1140 A RESERVE CAPACITY 1138 LEVEL OF SERVICE RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STREET - EB /WB • A 935 A 907 A • DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4/5/1989 INTERSECTION •AT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION • FAS144 S. 144TH STREET @ 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. IIWEEKDAY AM PEAK 1991 CBD ?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST T R A F F I C & R O A D W A Y C O N D I T I O N S GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (7.) (7.) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds /hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 WB 4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 I I (ACo11.1(4 1 1 G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 _ APP LT' TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM ,LNS WD EB 1 51 1 LTR 1 16.0 WB 1 50 1 LTR 1 16.0 NB 3 4 7 LTR 1 11.0 SB z. - LTR 1 11.0 INTERSECTION : S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4/5/1989 •AT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION • FPS144 WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1991 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST V2',P1 \ . PAA'k- Ar CBD ?N 1 ��th Ste' iS1 dive. S► U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP EB WB NB SB C R I T I C A L GAPS CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN 5.00 5.00 6.50 6.50 6.00 6.00 5.50 5.50 APP EB WB NB SB V O L U M E A L L O C A T I O N LANE 1 L T R sd (.1 Cr 0, 74 116 2 v r.) t.J cn LANE 2 L T T O L A N E S LANE 3 R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP EB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE WB RESERVE CAFACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE NB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAFACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - EB /WB • LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 1061 A 1100 A 805 A 853 A • S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. IIWEEKDAY PM PEAK 1991 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES . 4/5/1989 •AT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION FPS144 CBD ?N T R A F F I C & R O A D W A Y C O N D I T I O N S GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS FED BUTTON ARR APP (X) (X) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds /hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -4 0 N 0' 0 ' 0.90 0 N 0.0 - --_ WB 4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 6 74 5 LTR 1 16.0 WB 6 116 2 LTR 1 16.0 NB 3 2 2 LTR .1 11.0 SB 3 2 7 LTR 1 11.0 INTERSECTION S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. WEEKDAY AM PEAK 1991 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES • 4/6/1989 /PLAT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION DAS144 tc°t \ A r I-\ CBD ?N S` q }'∎ &r / S Y` Ave.' U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP EB WB NB SB C R I T I CAL GAPS - -- CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN 5.00 5.00 6.50 6.50 6.00 6.00 5.50 5.50 APP EB WB NB SB V O L U M E A L L O C A T I O N LANE 1 L T R 1 51 2 50 5 4 2 3 LANE 2 L T R 0 0 0 0 T O L A N E S LANE 3 L T R O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP EB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE WB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE NB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE SB RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF SERVICE MAJOR STREET - EB /+ LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 1140 A 1135 A 930 A 903 A • INTERSECTION : S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4/6/1989 •LAT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION • DAS144 WEEKDAY AM PEAK 1991 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST CBD ?N T R A F F I C & R O A D W A Y C O N D I T I O N S GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (V.) (7.) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds /hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -4 0 N • 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 WB 4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 1 51 2 LTR 1 16.0 WB 2 50 1 LTR 1 16.0 NB 5 4 11 LTR 1 11.0 SB 2 3 2 LTR 1 11.0 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4ItAT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION INTERSECTION s S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1991 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST • 4/6/1989 DPS144 k pry. , CBD ?N `AA+�- St, /s 1 RV Q • S, U N S I G N A L I Z E D C R I T I C A L G A P S CRITICAL GAPS (SEC) APP LEFT TURN THROUGH RIGHT TURN EB 5.00 WB 5.00 NB 6.50 6.00 5.50 SE 6.50 6.00 5.50 V O L U M E A L L O C A T I O N T O L A N E S LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L T R L T R L T R EB 6 74 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 WB 11 116 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB 3 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N S I G N A L I Z E D APP LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 EB RESERVE CAPACITY 1061 - -- LEVEL OF SERVICE A WB RESERVE CAPACITY 1091 LEVEL OF SERVICE A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 818 - -- LEVEL OF SERVICE A SB RESERVE CAPACITY 847 LEVEL OF SERVICE A MAJOR STREET - EB /WB • • DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 4/6/1989 •AT OF TUKWILA JUNCTION • DPS144 INTERSECTION s S. 144TH STREET @ S. 144TH STREET @ 57TH AVENUE S. @ 57TH AVENUE S. WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1991 CBD ?N UNSIGNALIZED — MAJOR STREET RUNS EAST / WEST T R A F F I C & R O A D W A Y C O N D I T I O N S GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (7.) (7.) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds /hr) Y/N SEC TYPE ER —4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 WB 4 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 NB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 0 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 6 74 7 LTR 1 16.0 WB 11 116 2 LTR 1 16.0 NB 4 2 4 LTR 1 11.0 SB 3 2 7 LTR 1 11.0 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 January 30, 1989 Mr. Bret Cummock ESM Inc. 941 Powell Avenue S.W. Suite 100 Renton, WA 98055 RE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR TUKWILA JUNCTION REZONE (88 -6 -R), SUBDIVISION (88-1 -SUB), AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (EPIC - 34-88). Dear Mr. Cummock, I am happy that we were able to discuss your January 26th letter and explore the potential options over the telephone today. Per your request, I have summarized my understanding of our conversation. Summary Information Items. 1. Information Requirements for Preliminary Plat Application Your definition of "Preliminary Plat" in RCW 58.17.020 as a neat, approximate drawing is correct. However, the City is also charged to ensure that platting can be done in a manner which satisfies City requirements; including, but not limited to infrastructure per RCW 58.17.110. The City requires the information requested in its January 6th letter to evaluate your ability to adequately serve this development. In addition, preliminary platting in Tukwila is a specific City Council action and requires completion of SEPA. All of the requested information is required to complete this SEPA evaluation for the preliminary plat. 2. Information Requirements for Rezone Application It is possible to have only the rezone application considered at this time. A SEPA determination will still be required. However, only additional access analysis (Item 3b, January 6th letter, City of Tukwila) will be necessary. • • Mr. Bret Cummock January 30, 1989 Page 2 Please note that all other information items will be required for any preliminary plat application and an additional, separate SEPA application on the plat will be necessary. As stated in my January 6th letter, the City will not proceed with application review until the required data is submitted. All information must be submitted by June 30, 1989. Failure to do so will result in return of your application and fees. Please contact Darren Wilson of our office immediately at 433 -1845 if further clarification is needed or for further assistance. Sincerely, ernon Umetsu, Associate Planner TO kk I TUWAY MESSAGE I SUBJECT: /L/4 // t -.1016.07 FROM I /94�,�90 DATE / ASSOCIATED L1-A2375 PRINTED IN U.S.A. AC C%14c6' Gam/ .49. 6 .71-iedit9-- s fl.ks e.)-2 zr wte,1 ' X14 ,'i, '. r.¢7-al G � k res, ri- FA /( i/ G �? Trj4Z/�Lii 4 / "if /1 G : ,. //,J�g� Ord E S S A G E "M*01/0 / ,C/ZaZ41 i% "Ae 96i i. i, ' /940, -sue killU)A4 SIGNED /9;•je,,fg,,/, R E P L Y DATE: SIGNED ASSOCIATED L1-A2375 PRINTED IN U.S.A. CITY OF TUKWILA S • CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC EPIC -34 -88 10 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM idep/ n BLDG n PLNG c541P.W. Ti FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT TUKWILA JUNCTION LOCATION 57TH AVENUE S. (NEAR N. HILL RESERVOIR) DATE TRANSMITTED 1 -3 -89 FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY MONDAY JAN 9, 1989 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT See e 'FSio S (c4----0\43r-) e-• eL1`s 10 5►.j (DELI DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 RECFn' -� JAN 0 ? 1,999 I vi..L.v ( icA..i CITY OF TUKWILA • III CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FILE EPIC -34 -88 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: WiLDG j PLNG 0 P.W. n FIRE in POLICE (--1 P & R PROJECT TUKWILA JUNCTION LOCATION 57TH AVENUE S. (NEAR N. HILL RESERVOIR) DATE TRANSMITTED 1 -3 -89 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED MONDAY JAN 9, 1989 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMME T 6 eoloptail/-5 DATE /0 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • 110 CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FILE EPIC -34 -88 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: [j BLDG j—( PLNG 0 P.W. n FIRE (t POLICE [ P & R PROJECT TUKWILA JUNCTION LOCATION 57TH AVENUE S. (NEAR N. HILL RESERVOIR) DATE TRANSMITTED 1 -3 -89 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED MONDAY JAN 9,1.989 THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE/ COMMENTS PREPARED C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA MCcil-- o . • CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC FILE EPIC -34 -88 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: 71 BLDG j PLNG El P.W. FIRE fl POLICE n P & R PROJECT TUKWILA JUNCTION LOCATION 57TH AVENUE S. (NEAR N. HILL RESERVOIR) DATE TRANSMITTED 1 -3 -89 FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY MONDAY JAN 9, 1989 STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT / .24- ea,/ 0- -2-) d u ,-ke- Mad , ., �'>41.s o 42 , / , 3\ /i4,4Z mum A,% /S O / DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 MEMORANDUM To: SEPA Reviewers From Vernon Umetsu RE: Tukwila Junction Subdivision Notes. Date: December 29, 1988 Please note the following in your review: 1. Topography is partially based an ground elevations shot by Public Works Dept. when they laid out the haul road. The remainder of the site was based on air photogrametry. No site specific ground surveys were done. 2. Average slope on lots 8-12 is 25-30 percent. 3. 57th Avenue So. is a low capacity road. Phil--any data on as builts? sheets attached 4. Pre-App commen t s . Applicant shall be responsible for resolving all issues by January 6, 1989 for Planning Commission review on January 26; or February 6th for review on the 23rd. 5. KEs-cecv(..y (S/2+788 KNITIROWENTAL CHEMIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: TUKWILA JUNCTION City of Tukwila, Washington 2. Name of applicant: Starbow Builders, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: CONTACT PERSON: Robert D. Scholes ESN. INC 941 Powell Ave. SW, #100 Renton. WA 98055 228 -5628 OWNER: Starbow Builders, Inc. 31849 Pacific Hwy S. #141 -M Federal Way. WA 98003 839 -0366 4. Date checklist prepared: December 7, 1988 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing. if applicable): 1 Pending review and approval of Public Works, Surface Water Management and other County agencies. Site improvement work is scheduled to commence in Spring of 1990 with anticipated completion to be Fall of 1991. Residential construction will occur after this date; however. no schedule has been established at this time. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansions. or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain. Not at this time 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared. or will be prepared. directly related to this proposal. None. • • 2 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain. None known 10. List any government approvals or pewits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. City of Tukwila Plat approval City of Tukwila rezoning approval City of Tukwila public works approval and permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal. including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this fora to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal is for the creation of a new subdivision comprising 17 lots situated on one parcel of R -1 -12.0 zoned property with a total site area of 3.81 acres more or less. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address. if any, and section, township. and range. if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan vicinity map. and topographic map. if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency. you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site lies on the West side of 57th,Avenue South beginning approximately 1020 feet South of the intersection of 57th Avenue South and South 147th Street. Legal Description: Parcel B. City of Tukwila short plat number 84-20 - SS. recorded under recording number 8407190829. said short plat being a subdivision of a portion of lots 19 and 20. Brookvale Garden Tracts. according to the plat thereof recorded is Volume 10 of Plats. Page 47. in Ring County. Washington. TOGETHER WITH: That portion of lot 20 and the South 8 feet of lot 19. Brookvale Garden Tracts. according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats. Page 47. in King County. Washington. lying Westerly of the Westerly Boundary of parcels A and B of City of Tukwila short plat number 84- 20-SS. recorded under recording number 8407190829. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • 1. KARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat. rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. other. Variable slopes to 25% +. Average slopes are approximately 10 -15Z. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 25Z+ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. clay. sand. gravel. peat. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify then and note any prime farmland? 3 Site is underlain by UR Urban Land Soils based upon the USDA soil survey maps. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. None noted on site. e. Describe the purpose. type. and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Anticipated grading and filling will be as required to provide construction of new residential streets and underground utilities along new street rights -of -way. Maximum width of clearing and grading is anticipated not to exceed 30' from centerline of right - of-way in either direction. Some limited grading and clearing is anticipated for utility easements. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? If so. generally describe. Yes. Clearing and construction associated with new residential construction activities, (if due care is not exercised) could contribute to the likelihood of erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious, surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 50% of the site will ultimately be covered with streets and buildings. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth. if any: All work will be conducted in compliance with the appropriate City of Tukwila ordinances with regard to temporary erosion control and other Surface Water Management requirements. 4 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Some dust and equipment fumes during construction of street. utilities and residential structures. It is anticipated that most residences will contain wood burning fireplaces. Automobile emissions can be expected when complete. (17 to 34 vehicles anticipated). b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. WATER a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes. please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawls or diversions? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities if known. No 5 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Possible pollutants contained in run -off from vehicular parking will be intercepted in the storm drainage control system. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N /A. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? Storm water and domestic water from residential streets and landscaping is the only anticipated source of run -off. Storm water collection on impervious surfaces will be directed to the storm drainage system and natural channels 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Pollutants from parked vehicles may collect on impervious surfaces and be washed into the storm drainage system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm drainage will be provided in conformance with City of Tukwila ordinances and regulations. 6 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen. or other % evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other % shrubs % grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants; cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skink cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some clearing of native trees, shrubs and ground cover will be required to provide new residential streets and underground utilities. Maximum anticipated area to be cleared should not exceed 25%. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known, d. Proposed landscaping. use of native plants. or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Clearing of this site will be limited to that necessary for plat construction. Landscaping of individual lots is anticipated to be that which is typical of single - family subdivisions. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle. songbirds. other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rabbits, rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring. shellfish. other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: None anticipated with the exception of water quality measures. 7 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric. natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The use and incorporation of electrical, gas or oil- fueled heating along with wood burning stoves and fireplaces associated with future residential construction is anticipated. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What other kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: None 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill. or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes. Those commonly associated with construction of a project of this type and the operation of construction equipment. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic. equipment. operation. other)? Traffic noise from I -5 Freeway is anticipated to have minimal inpact on the site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, 1 construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 8 Typical noise associated with construction of streets, utilities, and residential construction may be anticipated during normal working hours. Vehicular noises associated with typical residential developments may be anticipated and would occur at times as is consistent with this type of development. Some vehicular noise from the I -5 Freeway would be anticipated to occur during working and rush hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently a large tract of ground with two single family residences; surrounding uses are single - family residential to the north and east, apartments to the west, vacant land to the south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Possibly as pasture for horses, etc. c. Describe any structures on the site. Two older single family residences. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the two existing residences e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R -1 -12.0, per the City of Tukwila and is proposed to be rezoned to R -1- 7.2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan 8- City of Tukwila comprehensive plan residential, the current zoning is If applicable, what is the current of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as "environmentally sensitive" area. If so, specify. designation of the site? designates the area as single family R -1 -12.0 per the City of Tukwila shoreline master program designation No 9 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 17 - SFR at 2.75 persons /unit = 47 persons j. Approximately how any people would the completed project displace? 2 - SFR at 2.75 persons /unit = 5 persons k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans. if any: The proposed plat is in conformance with the standards set forth by the City of Tukwila Subdivision ordinance. assuming re -zone to R -1 -7.2 is obtained. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. 17 single family detached - middle income b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. 2 single family detached - middle income c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 30 feet - (consistent with R -1 zoned areas). b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Obstruction of any views in the immediate vicinity is anticipated to be minimal and will be dependent to a large degree on the siting of individual residential units within the subdivision. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Existing trees and vegetation will be retained to the maximum extent possible. 10 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. Wbat type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from individual dwelling units; residential street lighting; and car headlights during hours of darkness; chiefly between 7 pm and 12 pm b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off —site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. if any: Street luminaires will be designed to control impacts. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Fort Dent Park, Tukwila Park b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project applicant. if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known • • 11 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None proposed 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Existing street serving the site is 57th Avenue South b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Transit service is available along Interurban Avenue and shuttle service is available along Macadam Road. c. Hov many parking spaces would the completed project have? Hov many would the project eliminate? 2 off- street parking spaces per unit (34) will be provided per code in addition to that available on residential streets. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes new public residential streets will be provided. These will connect to existing.57th Avenue South. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. Hov many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Using 10 trips per day, anticipated ADT is expected to be 170 trips. AM and PM peaks will be as is typical for a development of this nature. E. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES 12 a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, proposal will result in need for fire and police protection. Proposal will also include school age children. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: N/A 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer. septic system. other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project. the utility providing the service. and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sanitary Sewer - City of Tukwila Electrical Service - Puget Power & Light Water and Sewer - City of Tukwila Telephone - U.S. West Gas - Washington Natural Gas. Construction will entail connection of new utilities to existing services located in the vicinity. New fire hydrants, if required, will be provided within the proposed development C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on the to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: ec /tj City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 October 7, 1988 Brad Decker Mustang Investment Group PO Box 22667 Seattle, WA 98122 Re: PRE - APP - 026 -88 -- Sweeny /Schultz Dear Mr. Decker: Enclosed are the pre - application checklists provided by the departments present at the October 6, 1988, meeting. In addition to those requirements, several other issues and comments should be reiterated. 1. Grade and fill permit, soils information and engineering will be required for any fill brought into the site. The fill available from the North Hill Reservoir site may not be the quality for "structural" fill. 2. The construction of the North Hill Reservoir, currently in Phase I of the project, will impact and take precedence over this development. However, the Public Works Department will make every attempt to work with the developer in coordination efforts. 3. Soils study shall also include recommendations for the specific lots. 4. It is essential that the concerns of soils, topography, utilities, geotechnical, etc. as discussed at the pre - application meeting, are addressed up -front in the environmental review process. 5. The deadline for the December Planning Commission meeting is November 7, 1988. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 433 -1851. Sincerely, -4/it 461 gcZGrc a Becky L. Davis Permit Coordinator Enclosure City of • .wila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 • PRE - APPLICATION MEETING ATTENDANCE RECORD Pre -app File # PRE- APP - 026 -88 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Project Name: SWEENY /SCHULTZ Meeting Date 10 -6 -88 Time 2:30 pm Site Address: 57 Av S (near N. Hill Reservoi Checklist mailed to contact person (date): 10 -7 -88 Initials: BLD r) STAFF PRESENT NAMES /TITLES CHECKLIST PROVIDED L1 Building (433 -1851) Duane Griffin, Bldg. Official; Becky Davis, Permits IX_ ® Fire (575 -4404) Nick Olives, Fire Marshal © Planning (433 -1849) Jack Pace, Senior Planner; Moira Bradshaw Assoc. Planner ] ® Public Works (433 -1850) Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer X-] _ ❑Parks & Rec. (433 -1847) ❑ L_ ❑ Police (433 -1806) ❑ Other ( ) ❑Other ( - ) APPLICANT /REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT Contact Person: Name Brad Decker Company /Title Mustang Investment Group Address PO Box 22669, Seattle, WA Zip 98122 Phone 527 -2143 Others Present: Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Company /Title Company /Title Company /Title Company /Title Company /Title Zip Zip Zip Zip Zip Phone Phone Phone Phone Phone City of kwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206)433 -1849 • CHECKLIST PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Land Use) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre -app File # PRE -APP- 026 -88 Project Name: Meeting Date 10 -6 -88 Time 2:30 pm Site Address: Zoning R -1 Sweeny /Schultz 57 Av S 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. LAND USE INFORMATION Compliance with the Zoning Code (Title 18). Obtain the following permits /approvals: (applications attached) Boundary Line Adjustment - Building Site Improvement Plan - Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Conditional Use Permit - Design Review - Design Review- Interurban jEvironmental (SEPA) Planned Mixed Use Development Planned Residential Development Rezone shoreline Management Permit Shoreline Management Permit Rev. - Short Subdivision Subdivision Unclassified Use - Variance, for Proposed use complies with zoning? Structure meets setback requirements? Proposal meetings minimum parking space standards? Roof -Top mechanical equipment screened? Site plan complies with landscape requirements. Yes _� N _ Yes N(; G. ,., i, ---.i ,� ,(.,L -t(/' ;� _ /es _ No ; ,If) No Yes No r _41# MIIMIEST 7 4//L— s ((' �� 1 if . 71 l� / 19. 20. Checklist prepared by (staff): City of 1l kwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Washington 98188 Public Works Department 433 -1850 • PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS (utilities) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre -app File # PRE - APP - 026 -88 Project Name: Meeting Date 10 -6 -88 Time 2:30 pm Site Address: SwPPny /Sr.hultz 57 Av S (near reservoir site Q CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION . Obtain the following permits: x Channelization /Striping /Signing x Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk _ Excavation (public) x Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) Flood Zone Control x Hauling (2,000 Bond, Cert. Ins.) _ Landscape Irrigation Moving an Oversized Load x Sanitary Side Sewer Sewer ? x Sewer x Storm Water x Water Water Water Water Other Main Extension (pri.yate) Main Extension (public) Drainage Main Extension (private) Main Extension (public) Meter (exempt) Meter (permanent) Meter (temporary) 2. Water and sewer assements may apply and will be determined during the plan review process. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9' 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. utility Provide sidewalks per Ordinance #1158, #1217 and #1233, or obtain waiver. Provide traffic analysis for: analysis of impact on57th Ave. So. Alie1/444 Kt Provide developers agreement for: Ott-e1, je- e7 1oa eree )0-er 4. "4-^ Provide Hydrological - Geotechnical analysis. Review traffic study prepared by Provide plan submittal per requirements on attached plan . submittal handout. Development will require gravity segwer easement to existing sewers in Macadam Road /S 150th St.') v+no./ ctto cam �-O we S +r . c a/ Storm system and hall road being constructed as part of reservoir d'nd scheduled for maybe one to two years or more (Phase I). Removal of existing hall road is and will be scheduled in Phase II of reservoir construction. Steep slopes may preclude some types of development. Gravity storm and sewer is required for all structures, no pumps allowed. Geotechnical soils analysis will be required of roadway bedding /foundation and erosion control throughout. Detention for existing storm system is limited to 12,000 sq. ft. zoned lots. Some of the proposed lots may not allow full use of structures (i.e. basements) to be fitted to a future gravity sewer system. 17. The City is now carrying out a sewer LID to serve this area with gravity sewers. Lots 10, 11 and 12 may not have adequate height -to be served or completely 18. served by the gravity line to S 150th St. This will be determined in the course of carrying out the LID. Even so, the developer will be required to 19. determine whether and how these lots will be served by a gravity system. 01 20. A water analysis will be needed to determine whether a water main extension from 57th Ave. So. needs to be a looped system connecting to S 150th St./ Macadam Road before /after reservoir high pressure system pumps are constructed. X 21. Offset of roadway per ing a rtment's comment. Checklist prepared by (staff) Date /0/ 2/2 City oftkwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 • PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DIVISION (construction) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre -app File # PRE- APP - 026 -88 Project Name: Sweeny /Schultz Meeting Date 10 -6 -88 Time 2:30 pm Site Address: 57 Av S Occupancy Group R -3 CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION 14 1. Comply with the provisions of the Uniform Building Code, 1985 Edition (as amended). [I 2. Comply with Washington State Barrier Free Code, 1987 Edition. 3. Comply with Uniform Mechnical Code, 1985 Edition. 1l 4. Comply with State Energy Code. Provide energy calculations stamped by a Washington State Licensed architect or engineer. Q 5. Provide licensed Washington Architect stamp on construction drawings. 6. Provide a soils report, stamped by a Washington State licensed engineer. Q 7. Submit structural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed struc- tural engineer. la 8. Obtain building permit. O 9. Obtain mechanical permit. Roof top mounted equipment requires structural calculations stamped by a licensed engineer. tg 10. Obtain grading /fill permit. 11. Obtain separate permit for rack storage. Rack storage must be designed for seismic zone 3. A licensed structural engineers stamp will be required for rack storage 8' and over. [[ 12. Obtain a sign permit (TMC Title 19). C1 13. Special inspectors will be required for Q 14. Notify Building Official of testing lab hired by architect or owner (not by contractor). g 15. Obtain approvals and permits from outside agencies (see attached misc. and outside agencies checklist). • Electrical permit and inspections through Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, 872 -6012. • Plumbing permit and inspections through King County Health Department, 587 -2732. Q 16. King County Health Department must approve and stamp plans for restaurants and food service facilities prior to submittal to Tukwila Building Division. 17. Provide plan submittal per requirements on attached plan submittal handout. c� 1 1, �C lr / � (14&/./A �.,� ? r t° ii):.;-c 4 /;c7• '.5 .Checklist prepared by (staff): ,�), -id" / /J' -11 Date A'•- City of 1wila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila. Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575-4404 • PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST FIRE DEPARTMENT (construction) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre -app File # PRE- APP - 026 -88 Project Name: Sweeny /Schultz Meeting Date 10 -6 -88 Time 2 :30 pm Site Address: 57 Av S Occupancy Group R -3 CONTRUCTION INFORMATION 1. The City of Tukwila has adopted the 1985 Uniform Fire Code. This and other nationally recognized standards will be used during construction and operation of this project. (TMC 16.16.120) 2. Fire hydrants will be required. (City Ord. #729) 3. Required fire hydrants shall be approved for location by the Fire Department, approved for purity by the Water Department, and fully in service prior to start of construction. A fire hydrant must be no further than 150 feet from a struc- ture; and no portion of a structure to be over 300 feet from fire hydrant. (UFC 10.301 and City Ord. #729) Q 4. Automatic fire sprinklers are required for this project. Sprinkler systems to comply with N.F.P.A. #13. Sprinkler plans shall be submitted to Washington State Surveying and Rating Bureau, Factory Mutual or Industrial Risk Insurers for appro- val prior to being submitted to Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval. Submit three (3) sets of sprinkler drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. (City Ord. #1141) 5. Maximum grade is 15% for all projects. Q 6. Hose stations are required. (City Ord. #1141) Q 7. A fire alarm system is required for this project. (City Ord. #1327) Plans shall be submitted to the Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval, prior to commencing any alarm system work. Submit three (3) sets of complete drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. Q 8. Special installations of fixed extinguisher systems, fire alarm systems, dust collectors, fuel storage, etc. require separate plans and permits. Plans to be submitted to the Fire Marshal prior to start of installation. (UFC 10.301) • 9. Portable fire extinguishers will be required in finished buildings per N.F.P.A. #10. (Minimum rating 2A, 10 BC) 10. Buildings utilizing storage of high piled combustible stock will require mechani- cal smoke removal per Section 81 of the 1985 UFC. V11. During construction, an all- weather access will be required to within 150 feet of the building. (UFC 10.301) [� 12. No building will be occupied, by people or merchandise, prior to approval and inspection by Fire and Building Departments. E f 13. Adequate addressing is required. Number size will be determined by setback of building from roadway. Four inch numbers are minimum. Numbers will be in color which contrasts to background. (UFC 10.208) Q 14. Designated fire lanes may be required for fire and emergency access. This requirement may be established at the time of occupancy and /or after the f!cili «v is in operation. (UFC 10.207 as amended) Q 15. Special Fire Department permits are required for such things as: storage of compressed gas, cryogens, dry cleaning plans, repair garages, places of assembly, storage of hazardous materials, flammable or combustible liquids or solids, LPG, welding and cutting operations, spray painting, etc. (UFC 4.101) o 16. Miscellaneous requirements Cc; At ,;,..c, c ut.. a.lcfcxe( ixui.t , . Checklist prepared by (staff): 's ;c 7 ,- C Date /0 City of Tukwila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575-4404 • PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST FIRE DEPARTMENT (inspections) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre -app File # PRE - APP - 026 -88 Project Name: Sweeny /Schultz Meeting Date 10 -6 -88 Time 2:30 pm Site Address: 57 Av S Occupancy Group R -3 INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT [� 1. Underground fire line from vault to riser a. Thurst block and rodding b. Type of pipe c. Depth of cover d. Flush e. Hydrostatic test f. Fire Dept. approved plans g. Materials and test certi- ficate [[ 2. Overhead sprinkler piping a. Hydrostatic test b. Trip test c. Alarm system monitoring test d. Fire Dept. approved plans e. Sprinkler head location and spacing C1 3. Underground tank a. Location b. Distance between tanks c. Distance to property line d. Depth of cover e. Vent piping, swing joints, fill piping, discharge piping f. Anchoring g. Hydrostatic test h. Separate Fire Dept. approved plans [� 5. Fire alarm a. Acceptance test b. Fire Dept. approved plans [J 6. Hood and duct inspections a. Installation b. Trip test El 7. Spray Booth a. Location b. Fire protection c. Ventilation d. Permit [[ 8. Flammable liquid room a. Location b. Fire protection c. Permit Q 9. Rack storage a. Permit b. Mechanical smoke removal c. Rack sprinklers d. Aisle width Q 10. Fire doors and fire dampers a. Installation b. Drop testing Checklist prepared by (staff) : L ., ".424) . Fir final Fire Dept. access b. Bldg. egress and occupancy load Hydrants . Bldg. address e. Fire protection systems (1) Halon systems (2) Standpipes (3) Hose Stations (4) Fire Doors (5) Fire Dampers (6) Fire Extinguishers 12. Other a. b. c. d e • • f. g. Date /V6,/ City of TLikwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Washington 98188 Public Works Department 433.1850 • PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS (utilities) FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre -app File # PRE- APP - 026 -88 Project Name: Sweeny /Schultz Meeting Date 10 -6 -88 Time 2:30 pm Site Address: 57 Av S CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION 1. Obtain the following permits: 2V Channelization /Striping /Signing —7 Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk - Excavation (public) _7 Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) Flood Zone Control A Hauling (2,000 Bond, Cert. Ins.) Landscape Irrigation - Moving an Oversized Load _z Sanitary Side Sewer 2. Water and sewer assements may apply . plan review process. Sewer Main Extension (private) Sewer Main Extension (public) Storm Drainage - Water Main Extension (private) Water Main Extension (public) Water Meter (exempt) - Water Meter (permanent) - Water Meter (temporary) Other and will be determined during the utility 3. Provide sidewalks per Ordinance #1158, #1217 and #1233, or obtain waiver. 4. Provide traffic analysis for: 5. Provide developers agreement for: 6. Provide Hydrological - Geotechnical analysis. 7. Review traffic study prepared by Q 8. Provide plan submittal per requirements on attached plan submittal handout. O 9.– ' Z W P m T w l L V E Q i . n e A QUA U(r - i - C- P - M t I N / T T . S W1/1 C rte-- U0 /5 , 1 SG=i LA) Et.uPMtv■T L.. v sTo>1.N.,■. Sy s Q 12. L_ El Q 13 . t I Sc- u l E 1 1 uS 1 W H � c FC I i t \ L Met OI� -S E _ �Ss ( � 'TO 0 14. . PkInsv I rkvo(N. is .V 1C(�'6, c l L N � CI A t11 I c l c� � � rtV, i) • 15.— rx L OCAn • 16. Q 17 . si b Krr., Ernt= \<.i v LI �-a tI • '1 Q 0 0 ES Av P P z r/1 LI Ix-fq T'I d awe 1PG\ uI)CI SL LS OP 1oi PN \‘_\ r)41\g y 'PLC /A WEVI Checklist prepare "ty (staff )1trp A% Date JO%/f-3 tP D'\-. 0 t)--) e4`/ 13 ED O 1 ��` "F-L• u ---i lI N (4 Uh 6a-T- v 3 c� 4 S 5. 3 0 GI ; o tC) z r s� sT 1 s U v.^ (T\1) Tb ra, o04 Sc.-1„AE P& DosC( L— )-rs r 1 ) N 5C kLLo -Fu 1 -o Te A Fu SE tcANCT ` -i st STerv. , �T' l 1 1T`7 s ) 'GA fl ki 1 g•,(,c- c. -vT A s at 1\ L 1 0 sv 1 fits i\ \-/'/ `u(T Qcs f3V3in LAS 1v1 11 M N 1 0 iN covv. p L:_1 -LL � {s C -AVM -Tv) �� �� -��M � Vim' ) l� �\-11 s w I LL., c-em c (Vy I v-er L., L._ ��. IL LpU I V�� wrt�ti �! L LoT S u__)1 LL -o 1 A C6 W-121 Tai T S 1\14(' k)--YAT-0\7_"\IN LU v p D CThNNLCri S, T /VA4 4I7A 13 S \_ Q C-or-CI f 1. -1(CT �� 7:7!"10' ‘2Q 7tl' ?rr)yiv r ?f - '7210Z;, , Oc n,u -- 72JJrL011 r ✓a/,) O ' t? in -p ?"1?2 (7 2 7�' -19,014.? 71^ 1714 'PW b / / -)-3s- p.4-7p.4-71/) sC' »,T ��'�L?'O ? - '; V rilyy O4 / 772.9/ • .,7 fl 7P70flrn - ' ,v (1 `r2'D 14,0 112) -2 V 1 ' 727vro(hh - (?J •yr - -Y 227 77 111710 , -r9 (iv 701- -' ' A4") - ?ITT o '''4. ')v:? 17) _ T'?? ru/cp)21 ' A%-2- T, 414--7)- , valu? oar 'G'7. ( Yj (1/7- /�')J�;{iy) '7 -=??2 //vt.t' ?1:? 12.5 J C/0.70/ -- V.i G 20z •4 - / -I '77/-00(0Y-0i � 7 '2720y1-7097 _i707-9 —,n /J77.20,2-,7 III a'Jt - - cut, IO7 ,ANA-, , , r70 'r7 (-)'77lrP7.709 '"),2/01,07 -x2i119 11717) S 8- ! . 2 ?7 ;1117C / -i-ra » (i ' P g g - e7 e 0 - ofv-v- rnV/ • • L 1"?L4±. C)) 44 - 1164 -e, L 1 ii pt7' . v Co/rt./0,v CC -t7' c-7-2 ' BwId)14. a. 0. 0) flu. LZ ! rr%QYL1 5 i,t, ✓r,L p61,c •LZ'Li / )644_&& 02 co -oYy,zic,. .6)-7;0.5 O a-84, Cz L pe-ti ] L - ,,LC,Z(tilL e C ih2. b1 ✓ c& c4.01Zmu't Oztez -;i /o=. ,iu'(JY1 OULCti4re d , - tiC Z 4- Fre:�C: fit/ '��•i� - .5 Y r? C •�1 La)? LC 66 sad/lit-6/(4 .. .c.c ) C4-034—& .5/.50.' 4( cam' _ Ccn v.01) - 70 C c.i f];14_/— L', u " y L-/ / b 6 e. /o cz37►."2f --2e_ C /' (' ;t y l D - J/t--artr v a am. , 71-0 Utz& o .t m - /2672‘,. &L L c'L- SuCt - eO)1C h, K.+J) 1t, Cut- /0 7-// r _Jvi Cu'! C� Cam-- �f-- e�.ec� �'e�'C � - �,rZti�C/ CTS C_ci� 17-6-e - /v. /''v 1/6(.3--1 61_4(2/A..4_ � rJ i/o' %1 ! �i) ✓ %� /LC 6 CL c.t. ;mac � C -C4fLe - tea;- t L , ( / Vf•4;‹.C%YI2i? ?xi1_Atei 7 (l3-t /aG LLi C��- ' /�L�iL ZC�'� (mil "V��� :�i7G� L (72 0-e- l /- �l C-' L1L1-21- L` 17 t - , '-t 7 (4- e- e-/'7l l L 6e-14, l� ✓=- -� ii �. L-:,10 c, j9J?' �? m o Do ‘,5.eG& r-c2/ /(c - )4)21.1 - CL /Ce'- 6.7Y1 z67,t 4_, L' GZ,L —ei atti. “-fz2 a iCup - l r� c' 2 u jr *' G amab,, U ac 41', /o c'tc.L (4!,.z e,-nt, /2tO i 5 i Ira? /C , - j. /t2-W - Cis_L”- .- .-ivyBoa -e'er 074." a- kie'l x: & 710 gy,/re;_ Ae))41.2 ( /). /y %US 1/7 -L - c'Z.t rl L,k y' ^,✓ -- (-Wu' CCC- &) 6:67 6-7)1 U cA:,a do _ t 2te---LA2t__AC(_11C4z C1)) U 4.2 / t../ , ; Cc! C 201' CcrL p1 _ )ACC CZ2/.22/ ‘Ca: & f77 p, T66 - 4264,' C(. er,? , 61 ✓OC. "CCU. - 6 Droi �GL. l'z i'L CLO ...Qi1 �'C°zC.2, /1'? CAL,- 7 C 6 'Z C&'II e J; / at- S /',f�1 f?2 -Z,�' 't ' G 4.-e- � ✓%!r " ( / i.., a%42././2 9 Cc zt_, GL& cria rG 67,7 G% a • .:. Gi::'!",!n _p/ i rl'°_ Alp- Jr,' 338 178 rn N LOf boon Oar l9 and 20 , Proper -� L 2 4.47Lic, /14 125 s-7'o oi4 5_7t Ct4 y Sitwrn 5 eitAder L y� u4;11 files . -, 1 G3' y�. pi. NcbK "up-1.O ..,. 1so"- sifP 7 (-- Perrt6r■Gn,r Frier -,.n± Lt and �t rsy S� h 7+i S ca fie q T to Z City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT G 6200 Southcenter Boulevard ? Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 PRE - APPLICATION PROJECT SUMMARY FOR STAFF USE ONLY Pre - application File #__y,_ -{j2-p -$r Date Received: Q -4-6' Meeting Date j0-0-33 Time o?,', Q/p,m. Routing:[ BLDG 21 FIRE ER1 PLNG PWD POLICE 51 PKS & REC 1. PROJECT INFORMATION &-61-&/ ,��,, erf Project Name ''!;,�alel y / S ul /- Site Address t t Z9 �' X144.1 Description of Proposal' re / S��bd'L?:do / /1 put) /t, es , ro<«ls 7'7. (A? G"CI ,yh Pvd- Acreage of Site (gross), Anticipated Period of Construction: From )7473150%.3///5? To GA/P' Will project be developed in phases? ❑ Yes >14No If yes, describe • Identify existing easements on site: P��� p P• t�� �; A,uJ. 6f- tl C, Fy f!" isciny" f �aS�'tc.if 2. BUILDING INFORMATION Total Building Square Footage Type of Construction (1985 UBC) Please indicate the square footage of each floor, broken down by building use(s): 1st Floor BUILDING USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL 2nd Floor / TOTAL 3rd Floor / TOTAL (For additional floors please fill out another sheet) Storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on premise or dreg of construction? ['Yes ❑ No If yes, explain: Number of parking stalls proposed: Regular 3. APPLICANT Contact Person �,'ac% .Li Ac'.� Address r'i2. c x XL, (2. '1 Compact Handicapped Company /i%., tac?4 t //).. h,)A Zi p `la))( Z Z. Phone# / - :c; y Prepared by Date e. QLr•rnern/ 1,:p /✓ rLl�_'. 338 17 • 125 VI .- 194r,d 20 --, 8• proper i7 L,„�- . , �. fir... L 0- o t;. N_ rt.; vJ CI T • C/.4y STorrn L_04 1 ;,;9,875 1 I ` ~ w I I ` 9,(4,0 15 Lef 7 I I ti q1(900 I , o' 1. t 1 1 , 1z/4 c/ % °a '� g400 & Ci4;11/41 G23 ri Lk, 14 - up •o S. Aso"' isy 7 ,5/ •S 7 ve. SCa • A PORTION OF.. THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, REVISIONS Do0.1mON /DATE Ett CITY OF TUKWILA. BOUNDARY I 1 'I LOW L nFtlsl�x J gFESTD im.Ai f. - lye\ j „I _LI_ I- I: .t: I.I. ;\ PUBLIC LI I. :FACILITIES ■ +' I. L. :: • OPEN SPACE • LEGAL .DESCRIPTION f A PRCEL. B. CITY• OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER. 84- 20 -SS,' RECORDED: • UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8407190829, SAID SHORT PLAT BEING _ SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOTS 19 'AND 20, BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE. PLAT THEREOF RECORDED. IN VOLUME 10.OF . PLATS; PAGE 47,. IN KING. `COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER. WITH.( THAT: PORTION. OF • LOT: 20 AND •THE. SOUTH. B 'FEET OF • •LOT- 19, BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS;. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDEO',IN VOLUME- 10 • OF PLATS, PAGE 47,'. IN KING COUNTY, :_ WASHINGTON; LYING WESTERLY. OF THE WESTERLY- BOUNDARY OF PARCELS. A AND B -OF. CITY.. OF "TUKWILA' SHORT PLAT - NUMBER .84-20-SS, RECORDED' • .UNDER; RECORDING, .NUMBER- ;8407190829. MEDIUM DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL:. .. OFFICE S. 132nd St. LEGEND ;. SPECIAL' CONSIDERATIONS W: 0 J STARBOW BU COMMERCIAL JOB NO 363 -04-880 OESIONED BY: . BAC. DRAWN BY: • ML. CHECKED BY:. L:T.P. DATE: D.C.me.., 138E DATE. OF • , PRINT NO. REVISIONS ocsanVSMI/GtE• A PORTION OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP. 23 . N., 'RGE.. 4 E., W. SITE VICINITY MAP -100 - 60 0 - - 100.. SCALE: 1 ° ,.- .100' S.150th St. UIEflF LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL B. CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT- PLAT NUMBER 84- 20 -55. RECORDED; UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8407190829, SAID SHORT PLAT BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOTS 19 AND 20, BROOKVALE GARDEN ' TRACTS.. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. RECORDED IN VOLUME . 10.:OF. PLATS, PAGE 47. IN -. KING - COUNTY, WASHINGTON. WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 20. AND THE SOUTH 8' FEET' OF LOT 19, BROOKVALE CARDEN TRACTS._ ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 110 OF PLATS. PAGE 47. IN KING. COUNTY. WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCELS A AND B OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT. NUMBER: 84- 20 -SS,. RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8407190829. - SITE STATISTICS BUILDERS, LEGEND ADJACENT • TAX: LOT PARCELS WITHIN 300 FEET OF SITE - -- -.- - ZONING BOUNDARY LINE WITHIN TAX LOT. PARCEL ZONING BOUNDARY LINE ALONG .TAX. LOT PARCEL DEVELOPER /OWNER: ENGINEER /SURVEYOR: TOTAL SITE AREA: ., TOTAL NUMBER OF L0T5:. EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: PROPOSED USE: SEWERAGE SYSTEM: SCHOOL DISTRICT: FIRE - DISTRICT:, TELEPHONE: POWER: ALLOWABLE DENSITY.'..- . CALCULATIONS: , STARBOW BUILDERS. INC. 31849 PACIFIC HWY. 5., #141 -M, FEDERAL WAY, WA.'. 98003 839 - 0366. ESM, INC. 941 POWELL AVE.' S.W.: #100 .. RENTON. WA . 98055 228 -5628 3.93 ACRES R -1 -12:0 - - R -1 -7.2 .. . SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CITY OF TUKWILA CITY OF. TUKWILA .SOUTH CENTRAL' SCHOOL DISTRICT _CITY- OF TUKWILA U.S. WEST PUGET POWER. ' U JOB NO. 306 -04 -680 DESIGNED 8Y: 0...0 - TOTAL AREA: 171.347. SF = 3.93 AC RIGHT -OF -WAY 'AREA:.. 33,492 SF - 0.77 AC TOTAL LOT AREA: 137.855 SF' = 3.16 AC AVERAGE LOT SIZE: - .8.109. SF = 0.19 AC SMALLEST LOT. SIZE: , 7,200 SF. = 0.17 AC . ALLOWABLE NO: OF LOTS 19 DRAWN BY: • E.B. CHECKED BY: DATE: 0.e•mb.r. 1955 PRIN 0410 T OF c, 2 1.198E A." PORTION OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 2 -4. E.,. W.M. REVISIONS DfSCRHTION/DATE H..�i T I TT.. 77.77-.11.7 PUBLIC Li • FACILITIES 1 7. 1.. I�rS :& OPEN SPACE • ' LEGAL • DESLRIPTION - PARCEL B, CITY, OF UKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER 84- 20 -SS. RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUUMBER 8407190829, SAID SHORT PLAT • BEING SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOTS 19 AND 20, BROOKVALE GARDEN- .. .TRACTS,- ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10. OF PLATS. PAGE 47 IN -XING COUNTY, WASHINGTON:* TOGETHER. WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT- 20. AND THE SOUTH 8 FEET OF LOT, 19, BROOKVALE .,GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT. THEREOF : . .RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 47.. IN KING COUNTY, •WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCELS • A AND B OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NUMBER 84-20-5S. RECORDED UNDER RECORDING. NUMBER' 8407190829 MEDIUM DENSITY (-RESIDENTIAL SPECIAL • DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS 'mP9 -1U 1s.Uj' . .108 NO. 366 -04 -880 DESIGNED BY: B.A.C. DRAWN BY: CHECKED 8Y: DATE 0e2ember. 1086 DATE OF PRINT. - • REVISIONS no. oESCRVRO8 /DAM{• T EXIST. SSMH • RIM = 165.8 LE.. 157.5 • 21'SD • 150th St' 1. UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN WERE DETERMINED-FROM AVAILABLE PUBLIC RECORDS. - - • 2. 5' CONTOURS' AND EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED:. • FROM EXISTING PUBLIC. RECORDS, - NOT A FIELD SURVEY. • 7, ALL STORM WATER RUNOFF.. WILL• BE DIRECTED TO EXISTING STORM.ORAIN. . ,. 4.' SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. TO BE PROVIDED BY LID 31 UNDER PREPARATION.BY CITY OF TUKWILA "5. WATER SERVICE TO'8E PROVIDED BY EXISTING 8" MAIN.IN 57114 AVE S: 6. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN SITE TO.BE DEMOLISHED. 10 EXIUSST. „ L HOE I 55• .. EXIST: HOUSE - —. ,PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS - ADJACENT TAX LOT PARCELS. W • - - EXIST. . WATER LINE. . -.SS. - EXIST. SANITARY SEWER LINE. W 0 2W 0 CO C 01 JOB NO. 066-04 -660 DESIGNED BY: B.A.C. DRAWN BY: • ER. CHECKED T: LT.P: DATE: Doe•mber, 1680 DATE OF DEC 2 1 906 PRIM SHEETS