The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-34-89 - LANE CHUCK - GRADE AND FILLCHUCK LANG GRADE & FILL FOR RESIDENTIAL SITE 14920 62ND AVE. S. EPIC -34 -89 C1TY OF TUKWILA 62ou.SUUTIICENTEK RQULEU,%! I1. TURIIYLA, II',1 ll,NGTON 98186 March 28, 1990 Chuck Lang 14920 62nd Avenue South Tukwila, Wa. 98168 I'HI(i.vI h is 06).1.1 -iMlu RE: Fill at 14920 62nd Avenue South, Tukwila, Wa. Dear Sir: i:an:r 1.. 1 'rn1hr.,ol. 1lucnr Public Works staff along with Building and Planning staff have reviewed the fill on your property. I have been requested by the Building Official to review this property in terms of drainage. It is noted that this fill was placed prior to permit issuance. There are still some unanswered questions which I would like to bring closure on through our review. Therefore, I request the following information be provided in the next week so I can continue with my review: 1. A copy of the legal survey that was carried out, which is the basis of the staking found in the field. 2. Identify on plan the permanent storm drainage facilities including: A. Original drainage pattern, including 2' interval topography. B. Permanent storm drainage facilities (including ditches). C. Original and final points of discharge to downstream properties. From my field review, I question whether the storm drain pattern has been changed as a result of the fill activities. The property now slopes to the southeast. Is additional drainage along the south and easterly borders of the property necessary? Is the drain plan submittal taking the drainage back to its original point of exiting your property? Please note the attached letter of January 30, 1990 from Lawrence J. Warren representing the Larry Popejoy property. From my field observations, it was not obvious that your fill extends beyond your own property limits, as claimed in this letter. If you can shed any light on this matter I would appreciate your doing so in your response. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance do not hesitate to call me at 433 -0179. Sin erely? flfr Phil Fraser Senior Engineer Public Works Department PF /amc xc: Ron Cameron Duane Griffin - Building Official Rick Beeler - Planning Director Development File: Grade and Fill - Chuck Lang Enclosure (1) amc:Lang WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal GRPDF AND FIIL PROJECT FOR A RFSTDFNTTAI STTF (THIS FTII HAS OCCURRED WITHOUT THE PROPER PERMITS). Proponent CHUCK FANG Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 14920 62ND AVFNIIF SOUTH TUKWILA. Wk. 98188 £FCTION 23 TQWNSWIP 23 RANGE 4 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -34 -89 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. El Q There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Address Date ifr Planning Director 6200 Southcenter Boulevard 7 Signature Phone 433 -1846 88 You may appeal t is determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS SEE ATTACHMENT February 5, 1990 Charles Lang EPIC -34 -89 Mitigation Determination of Nonsignificance SEPA Conditions: 1. Based upon the Environmental Checklist, dated December 12, 1989, prepared by Charles Lang the applicant will do the following: A. Per p.7 of the SEPA Checklist- "water runoff " - provide a drainage plan to include the original drainage pattern within and into additional properties. Provide a new drainage plan taking flow to the original point of discharge to the lower properties. Purpose: Mitigate impacts of the changes in the drainage pattern caused by the fill. ENVIRONMUITAL REVIEW ROUTH% FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EPIC: -31/ .- g 1 TO: fl Building fl Planning Pub Wks Li Fire 1 1 Police 1 Parks /Rec: PROJECT C° / tx 1-A-rl ADDRESS 1 IA fj (� Ale DATE TRANSMITTED 3i IT'D RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /5-ho STAFF COORDINATOR 'E.Q � DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT IGq�, tJs e - COil ot,Oon LL S'+' 6Y) S 10 1.-t ti S -t.c.) 51 n4-R.c 6-P-4438.5 OcicuUT Lis cio C, -tmoE dN Ful.r) jof✓S (tier .- -ro !I') ; 3. .t a o 0- .S to t t ia, ►,ny X114' 411 ■sSL4 -Ls Lc_t,_ lC c) -E 1" r-L r 10 -7 --f;°i v,k tYo____ i2s(eNieos-Ym Ti) Poles IMP- fan a c drnrnP-471 `f (Lev (OX ID (LA ^PLL N T3 J iv c c gDE -62! (. 7 Mv1.___ -4-1 fr, ?' tiVN Wiz -(i.) Ma.) �T3l 7-4-<- "' 76)1,--17- (IF j /_c c /9 -R(its- f rb o pokri ?wk.? in ITcJ-/tr (MP/Jrs ci ellr..fre.s" (h) 0A I 1"�(� Iv T� vll l tr(r, -r9-t Date: cn lisoo u y FILL. Comments prepared by: 09/14 /89 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONnIAv TAL REVIEW FtOUTIiQG FORM EPIC: -3 S 9 Planning ,& Pub Wks Fire PROJECT C-hu GK L-A-r-Nj ADDRESS , 1i10 Gj� 14 'Je_ Sd DATE TRANSMITTED 113111D STAFF COORDINATOR 011-69 � RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /5)g6 DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and . comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT PteAs,2_, f4,tsu3e e. **-0 cext ou31Y1� c ies+ ms 1 6 W jk-t Op, -ekt) S( ire e.ce. c t [k i nj O C_C_LA Z- 01)4- \ S --LkeL t r‘AL 3. ►a i c,t,t1 sktz\,c n i Ubt \xLOk s �.�,n25 N.V1' 't 411 sSui.2 -S upeelp_ c��C' ca L Be asP, {.42 .0 tin am n '-et Date: Comments prepared by: , 09/14 /89 WARREN, KELLOGG, BARBER, DEAN & FONTES, P.S. • ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAWRENCE J. WARREN DANIEL KELLOGG MARK BARBER DAVID M. DEAN ZANETTA L. FONTES ROBERT L. SEWELL January 30, 1990 Mr. Rick Beeler Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Seattle, Washington 98188 Re: Larry Popejoy Property Dear Mr. Beeler: 3 1 1990 By letter dated October 9, 1989, I wrote to you concerning problems of fill on the Larry Popejoy property caused by an illegal fill of his adjacent neighbor, Mr. Lang. To this date the illegal fill still remains on the Popejoy property. That fill is now causing problems with surface water runoff. It appears that Mr. Lang has not satisfied the city of Tukwila's demands as outlined in a letter to me dated October 25, 1989, from Leigh Ann Tift, Assistant City Attorney. As part of my October 9, 1989 letter I requested, pursuant to the public records laws of the state of Washington, a copy of all documents relating to the fill. I received two documents; a permit to install /repair sewage disposal system and a copy of a letLer from the city of Tukwila to Mr. Charles Lang dated August 2, 1989, and signed by Duane Griffin. I now specifically request copies of the survey that was performed on the Lang property, as Mr. Popejoy believes that the fill intrudes onto his property to a greater extent than that acknowledged by Mr. Lang or the city of Tukwila. Mr. Popejoy has not agreed to have fill placed on his property. He believes the fill is damaging as it creates a looming effect on the uphill property, accentuates the slope, greatly limits the usable land between the toe of the slope and the edge of the hill, and is leading to substantial problems with surface water drainage. The city of Tukwila should not issue a fill permit to Mr. Lang as long as these problems remain. It is not an appropriate function of city government to permit one property POST OFFICE BOX 626 • 100 SOUTH SECOND STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 PHONE (206) 255 -8678 • TELECOPIER (206) 255 -5474 Mr. Rick Beeler January 30, 1990 Page 2 owner to damage another property owner in the course of requiring the first property owner to correct an illegal fill. The old adage remains, two wrongs do not make a right. Mr. Lang was wrong in putting in the fill in the first instance, and the city of Tukwila should not compound that wrong by permitting the activity after the fact. Very ruly yours, LJW:as. cc: Mr. Popejoy A8.52:23. Lawrence J. Warren ENVIRONM NTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. z.5:1/y ADDRESS /97)0L _ Sr DATE TRANSMITTED /2;07 STAFF COORDINATOR 27) EPIC: .5 Y 89 Police � I Parks! RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /24_21/477- DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review-and.. .commentbelow to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination .The .:;environmental.revlew file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning .Commission,.' Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT 4-,2s-el 4&v /f��v, C)C /es � s /6-)4v Awe/e2* 4e/‘- -3. 4;th/id ' /4e Z ) 2 /_5 ? s�ll� sya e-0,r toa s --1146044-1 ' *e to /6cedkm okway 4rvon -hill 4 re& . A:4 ,64// /d1m ZIk 4// Le. i,i 4echi ,'- 9/ ua ifhw 5)/i?, - YaiK 7:1eZ/VS "Q.4.‘i -4/ Date: a -al , r Comments prepared by: , f, Cyr 09114/80 Contrilpo. Epic File No. 814--el Fee $100.00 Receipt No. zArOjr ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project if applicable: ii /A 147,, 2. Name of applicant: (•{,&i& 171/4t 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: /?-Q �v L ikl . . � -- L 9f z w— 5 ?s49 4. Date checklist prepared: - 5. Agency requesting Checklist: (City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): .41I- 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 4 /0AJE- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Alo 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. t, 4, &1044e4,5 1 AV /,lam pe,,eini Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here.,V, 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not 4 required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? ,_, — - -3- f JO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA. ' 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. G escription of the site (circle one): Flat, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (asproxima, percent slope)? (1 c. What general t o 'ils are found on the site (for example , sand gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the asst .f ion of agricultural soils, specify them and note an rime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vjcinity? If so, describe. AAD e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or gr ding proposed. Indicate_ source of fill. L4io; f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, constructio , or use? If so, generally describe. 4/0 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No/116_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or oiler impact 0 tt he earth, if any: 07 7 / 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 6 i b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposft ? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or contr emissions or other impacts to air, if any: /T 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, tate what stream or river it flows into. _3 . 411 . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please/ describe and attach available plans. �� 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would__be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.__ T "iicate the source of fill material. / $ ' YAecIS 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, apd approximate quan- tities, if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If_so_, no_te_.locat_ign, on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waster and anticipated volume of discharge. III Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and! - 1pproximate quan- tities, if known. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals of hwnan.s the system(s) are expected to serve.,': . c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known).. Where will this water flow? Will this water f1oowj into other waters ? - -, t_f. _ so . describe. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or,s/Grface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control su fa e, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs �grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amountfoof.y'eg..tation will be removed or altered?_________________ (( c. List threatened or endang$� ed�s ecies known to be on or near the site. � • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or glance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Ak mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: A/6 )4 r b. List any threatened or endanger:. s.e '-s known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part %of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to p14or enhance wildlife, if any: — • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used f r heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Y �_ c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NO 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of tiis proposal? If so, describe. 0 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or contr 1 environ- mental health hazards, if any: iivo Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise 4 impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current shof the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been 4e for agriculture? If so, describe. Nn c. Describe any structures on the site. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be ,demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current znnina_._classif_i.eation o the site? f. What is the current Commrahonsl.ve plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current sho eline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ,__ i. Approximately how many people w d reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people ,w ld the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate wheth r high, middle, or low - income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exteriox building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? O Ai b. Could light or glare from the finished projp safety hazard or interfere with views? ea c. What existing off -site sour s of 1. t or glare may affect your proposal ?_Q /t 1' y� d. Proposed measures to reduce control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational 1 oQpor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NQ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities tp,be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • Evaluation for a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to thf site? If so, generally describe. 0 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultur importance known to be on or next to the site. Agency Use Only c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts `if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the exi ng street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the n rest transit stop? () c. How many parking spaces would the completed pr have? Now many would the project eliminate? Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally despfiibe (indicate whether public or private). / /1/ 0 e. Will the project use (or occur in th immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transp tation? If so, generally describe. 0 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If k o�ur, picate when peak volumes would occur. ��O/(� g. Proposed measures to reduce or ,q(or�trol transpor- tation impacts, if any: �.� 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, ,spo ols, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or cont of direct impacts on public services, if any. cont • Evaluation for 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic_- F.•-tom ,•. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which mig t be Ae.eded. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the let agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: e__ la- tF - fy PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAill • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous subst nces;r2r production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such incre, es are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plans, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve pl /gts, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete e natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve en and. natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or /,prime farmlands? // 1A- Proposed measures to protect such resources or ,tq avoid or reduce impacts are: �/ 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompati k with existing plans? • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land /V4 use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirem n s for the protection of the environment. I/ IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only. 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If „,aha#—rp � � / cies of the Plan? l UU I / �I Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: ..TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Avr 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? ,, A 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: , , A Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? �i 1 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23-