Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-345-86 - CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS - NATIONAL HEALTH LABS BUILDINGNATIONAL HEALTH LABS EXPANSION 18251 CASCADE AVE. S0. EPIC 345 -86 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor February 10, 1987 Mr. Dick Reeves, P.E. Senior Associate Wilsey and Ham P.O. Box C -97304 Bellevue, WA 98009 -7730 11 FEB I 0 1987 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. RE: Revised Site Development Plan Received February 2, 1987 for Storm Drainage for National Health Labs Dear Dick: The Public Works Department has reviewed and approved the site plan for storm drainage per the February 5, 1987 DOE letter from Janet Jorg per the following conditions and requirements: Twenty -four hours prior to beginning the construction of the storm drainage, the developer shall apply for and obtain the following permit: 1. Storm Drainage Permit (Permit fee: $25.00) No construction or regrading shall encroach to the landward tow of the levee. If you have any questions regarding this matter do not hesitate to call me at 433 -1856. Sincerely, C;E:m • Phil Fraser Senior Engineer /cd Enclosures: 2 xc: Planning_Director Building Official Permits Coordinator Dave Grage Janet Jorg Andy Levesque, King Co. Surface Water Mgmt. ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4350 - 150th Ave. N.E. • Redmond, Washington 98052 -5301 • (206) 885 -1900 February 5, 1987 Wilsey & Ham Engineering & Planning Services PO Box C -97304 Bellevue, WA 98009 -7730 Attention: Dick Reeves Gentlemen: RECEIVED FEB 6 1987 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Flood Control Application 1- 5954 -2, National Health Laboratory Our earlier assessment of your flood application has been revised following a meeting with staff from the city of Tukwila. It is affirmed that we use the FWVWA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) Flood Insurance Rate Maps to determine if projects are in the flood plain in Tukwila. Since this project is not encroaching the landward toe of the levee (per revised drawings, received 2 -2 -87) the site lies outside the 100 year flood plain as shown on the FEMA maps. Therefore, no state flood control zone permit is required. Sincerely, Janet Jorg Resource Management JJ:cd cc: King Co. Surface Water Management City of Tukwila ■ January 30, 1987 File No. 3- 570 - 2001 -23 Mr. Phil Fraser Department of Public Works City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: NATIONAL HEALTH LABORATORY Dear Phil: WILSEY & HAM ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public Improvements • Land Development • Transportation 1980 112th Avenue N.E. P.O. Box C -97304 Bellevue, Washington 98009 -7730 (206) 454-3250 REr,EIV7D FEB 2 1987 i�... LA PUL LiC WORKS In accordance with our recent conversations I have revised the plans for expansion of the National Health Laboratory in Southcenter South Industrial Park. These revisions will delete all construction activity from within the 30 foot mainten- ance easement along the Green River levee. Attached herewith are six sets of prints showing the site plan and topo over the site; the paving, grading, and drainage plans with outline specifications; and levee cross - sections between the site and the Green River. I believe these plans are now ready for approval by your office. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, WILSEY & HAM Dick Reeves, P.E. Senior Associate DR /ljr Attachment cc; King County S.W.M., Mr. Andy Levesque D.O.E., Mr. Herman Huggins A.H. Croonquist & Associates, Mr. Al Russell Offices in California. Colorado, Oregon and Washington. ::METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 October 31, 1986 Rick Beeler Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Determination of Non - Significance File No. 345 86: Corporate Property Investors Dear Mr. Beeler: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant adverse impacts to its wastewater facilities. Water Quality Metro has designated the Green River as a major water of regional concern. The protection of its water quality is a high priority. Because the project is adjacent to the river, there is a potential for adverse environmental impact during the construction and /or the operation stage. We strongly encourage the City of Tukwila to require the proponents to incorporate mitigating measures as part of their expansion plans. Mitigating measures should include but are not limited to: - Oil /water separators and grassed swales to prevent pollutants from paved areas entering the river; maintenance of adequate setback and riparian vegetation; - temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities during the construction stage; - ensuring that any toxic chemicals oils, petrochemicals and other potential pollutants being handled at the laboratory do not enter the surface waters; and [NOV 0 3 1986 CITY OF TUkW =.A PLANNING DEPT. °lt CSIHNf® • 0 Rick Beeler October 31, 1986 Page Two - regular maintenance of permanent storm water control facilities to ensure their long term effectiveness. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:jmg A F F I D01 V I T O F D I S T R I B!T i 0 N I, 'kV, [] Notice of Public Hearing [] Notice of Public Meeting [(. Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet • Board of'Appeals Agenda Packet [] Planning Commission Agenda Packet [I Short Subdivision Agenda Packet hereby declare that: Determination of Nonsignificance • Mitigated Determination of Non- significance [[ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Notice of Action [I Official Notice • Notice of Application for [] Other Shoreline Management Permit [� Shoreline Management Permit [] Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on _/ /-7 , 19 ? Wad-Lei 4-6-11" Name of Project t C ge/(A,468/(t Signature File Number EP/C-' 45 -.36 CHECIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAIL Federal Agencies /6 /7 Ze& 60g ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION WA.ST. OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ) WA.ST. TRANSPORTATION DEPT. WA.ST. DEPT. OF FISHERIES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR WA.ST. PLANNING & COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AGENCY ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (Region X) State Agencies if( )WA.ST. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES ')WA.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISIOf (-7/WA.ST. DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION WA.ST. DEPT. OF GAME ( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL County Agencies ) K.C. DEPT. OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVEL. ( )FIRE DISTRICT 1 FIRE DISTRICT 18 ( )FIRE DISTRICT 24 BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD K.C. HEALTH DEPARTMENT SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA LIBRARY ) RENTON LIBRARY KENT LIBRARY PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT I,/ X WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS WATER DISTRICT 75 ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ) GROUP W CABLE ) KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ) TUKWILA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ) TUKWILA MAYOR ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: Public Works Parks and Recreation ) Police Fire ) Finance Planning /Building fsc )K.C. BLDG & LAND DEVEL.DIV. -SEPA INFO CNTR Schools /Libraries ( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY Utilities {" <PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ( )VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( )WATER DISTRICT 20 ( )WATER DISTRICT 25 ( )WATER DISTRICT 125 ( )UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD City Agencies ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION ( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) Edgar Bauch ( ) Marilyn Stoknes ( ) Joe Duffie ( ) Mabel Harris ( ) Charlie Simpson ( ) Doris Phelps ( ) Wendy Morgan Other Local Agencies PUGET SOUND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT (PSCOG) ) PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ) TUKWILA /SEA TAC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( ) RENTON RECORD CHRONICLE Media )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIVISION Office /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more Residential 50 units or more Retail 100,000 gsf or more ( )HIGHLINE TIMES ( )SEATTLE TIMES WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal 7,500 square foot addition to existing 7,500 square foot building - National Health Labs with required parking area. Proponent Corporate Property Investors Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 18251 Cascade Avenue S. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 345-86 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [ There is no comment period for this DNS x[[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by October 31, 1986 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official' Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Date (ACE (t.,,Itc1 Signature Phone 433 -1845 188 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS -'~ CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM s CN "8!v -3aq EPIC - 345 -86 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [ BLDG j-f PLNG Flrp.w. FIRE POLICE 1 v('P & R PROJECT Na c,J N{a_ttk) Aakaa) 4pam,exv-kv LOCATION Ig -25 t "C(Q C au.e1 u - w • Xy • FILE NO . DATE TRANSMITTED 9/01q/B° ;RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR 7i, S4 6}O (i. iaGL 1/4 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE ING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE �r � A YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY C� <<. SO4 D BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. 9 Y 0 io /sls6° /0/9/8 ITEM COMMENT '44 , /12Q��7 /11 ,c rr n 146-- �F ,,,d)i-i, 6)_ lU o .mot v ( a nurse v�-t�c� c� — _ �i'1 C,2a21US -- Til r� Co ee4- C6 11 c.e.r vLS 161 1( b•e_ .- tress -ed Oh 6 u 1 I41 )- • F,,,,,„---ci- 4001i-c44-0/1 DATE /P/f/010 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 Gi1T Ur IO NILM CE RAL PERMIT SYSTEM �n -?S (o -Jr.11 1PIC - 39 -5 -86 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: ' dBLDG EETPLNG Erp.W. ✓ FIR I[ OLICE� w P & R PROJECT Nod Aa a,4) e LOCATION Igz/ ('ALCIdt/ a,uf. . 11. DATE TRANSMITTED QaZ9SG RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /D/3%$(0 STAFF ,COORDINATOR g. k tat.)6IIIi.4(QaY,LGU) RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. FILE NO. ITEM COMMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT CONCERNS: 1_ DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE COGESTION CAUSED BY construction VFHTCI FS. 2_ CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SPILLAGE ON ADJACENT STREETS. 3_ ADEQUACY OF PARKING FOR FACILITY...PARKING ALREADY A P.ROBEM IN THE AREA. 4. UPGRADING LIGHTING AND SECURITY SYSTEMS TO PROVIDE A MORE SECURE ENVIRONMENT. ]0 -6 -86 pjl DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TU6ILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • RECEIVE SEP 2 k) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: PUSL(C \MAKS OF "' CN -5 -3�q EPIC - 39-5 -86 FILE TO: [J BLDG FTPLNG I( P..W.J FIRE POLICE 20, & R PROJECT Aktftri 11(4,111.1b a 4 LOCATION 152,57 /1 � ('�ea��u aw. . 1G• FILE NO. • DATE TRANSMITTED= Q aq g' RESPONSE REQUESTED_ BY /O/3)8( 7 • STAFF COORDINATOR i ' /JOX) / 4.1adeiI l RESPONSE RECEIVED lQ 6/FG THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING 'THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION•. THE ENVIRONMENTAL,REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE,ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL•;SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT YG t_.(1(ft' 1 1'Y114 \I- I N e Lu o t_f .i ` '• i l I C �,. � � S �Lt DAt> odwat a 12 41 % ,N 'i� e _ _____Itoi■NL_Vitb_tiLA CON .:11140ky_. Ria11105)„__ DATE 1of3 /; �► COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN - $ (o EPIC - 39 -s -86 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: BLDG Q PLNG P.W. ( ✓ FIRE POLICE -P_ &R .TJ PROJECT Na a kkaLtA, )iaam) UpaAtatiryo LOCATION 1S25/ MAtactei I2ij p . FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED Q /aqS RESPONSE _REQUESTED _BY 4-3114 STAFF COORDINATOR .ktbet-00»o (M.P10601 w) RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE `O - - -'6 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 -- -- CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN -$67-3Jc EPIC - 34-5 -86 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [E BLDG ((pLNG] P.W.. (�✓ IRE POLICE L±p & R PROJECT Na*ovi AkCatk) hQjQejj Upant,CPU)1,0 LOCATION /gas /�"'" ('Ci!)�CIuX/ awe. 10. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED Q �a9lgG (-RESPONSE REQUESTED BY -Q /3 l$(0 - - -3 STAFF COORDINATOR ,k kitib0'K)(M. 1aG klatO RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE /0 2g COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 A. ,• 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for ctr fir, your proposal. ►^- T () o f OeC FMS i c-) 11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete .description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. CI= T4G- CT R= _ns,yr� [�.� L, w ' T► .��(��L.ZI/��r�1 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with a per you are ca- tions related to this checklist. Y permit applica- 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? the City's Comprehensive Land �? ! L1e_�1i1 P eMC- • -3- h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 1 ,.)e • 2. Air Evaluation for Agency Use Only •a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 4)AL..Ji— 1.?s-r— 4 evert ISions Lga-vTF-o e7-1 Cr -3yJcfl Th l s 1,&c cTeo , ,mss -rot„ �.,��-r- s ,� ex f nsld(-1 Tv r4 r L t--i r L7)-1 E �PF -C-7- c m C .� �•C C) z . e: - n t o.� O b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor S' cr4"es, that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Pc,r c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: r4on. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. -79-1- izJ Is 76,o cEZT „0,4 3q ( (. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. j-}a d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:_ thtzaa__ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ----- d iduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs e/lrass. pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Scor-le. L c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Hone— Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? W► LL 1°ADAJ ► fl i p e -Res-04d b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 1-4o c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? t--Joe., d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: f—Iof-,e- 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? 7-1— _ /s.) A c. --7— lrt,L) ii-0...ou4 GAS i Ce- rpc - b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 1 --lo.n e CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • • CN - $ (o - 3aq EPIC - 34s -86 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: C[� -BLDG1 LNG ( P.W. FIRE POLICE "P & R PROJECT Na*o71 l Aka W( & eigpamizolo LOCATION 1525/ &V. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 09/2 RESPONSE REQUESTED -BY /0/3)86, STAFF COORDINATOR 7'i /JQ7U( 4. 1aa ) RESPONSE RECEIVED /6)-/-go THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT B. (p. ((1.`irC) /9'$6 (.c/QbA Fi`d`e (f io h J4, (ybitc.21, $ - ,.y �� eo,,Ef may 4 1 £u4 DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 FY) rill Ill) n lo • SEP 2; 19864 Y- �F _ " � 'raJa K3''1ILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PLANNIN DEPT. A. BACKGROUND Controlo. 86- 3 j Epic File No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 7/ GPI FJaT too. (3 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: NA'T'O— t-f &, .c."r -4 LAY'' 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: (,...Y1-4( ( ca.. 1 22 CC + o 4. Date checklist prepared:. 1-'z&.' • 8CP 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): t?? 1 ✓-) nS- :a.)c5r x— e.-c7 M Go -n c X—t C) r—. JU�� ! 1 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, . directly related to this proposal. tJo n e, 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly •affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. fr itr 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for /4edU S- I- MP7r -i-- your proposal. Mrt e ie ‘,Z ✓r-le.- :Dvi ►i.T �7" ( T C)ec t SS , .P.ac UZ-P3 lEkLT 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this ,checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. f- e2=Nc.714-�4 t .gb*ea��%:l1L 4t 1 �1..__� Ntol�t .�n Zc� Z Ferns,or -rc5 cam,,2s��'► � - Lp4 6F- E' ,C)S�a � ► � w LLT � a. lnn m_P 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 1P71. SI � ;- %( � -Lid)-1.-)L-C-14 r179----*m7230 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Ti-11 tS eczr- -3- • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL .ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? E 9/a ae2- ( mss c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. trnfMiL{ SILT' ` C>PS . Are there surface indications or-history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 0 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. t- c, S►c3,nt Etcr) r-'7" '( iuu on , 6. Trrt rvi o.g- C--, le,ntca n G ► L,u I (21 Fat -n-As Pe2osACT' f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. -h-S � ter- s H-U 4 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? °12-- % ( n c t.. mac. o, C , —' n 1 ► _ •1At -k-S t --t eal LL:ar_ ___ h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: -I -1c,,ne 2. Air Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. LAS4. AL.,(-7.c' 1tjsT-- 4 �M/v1IS1onS G(= -Q As 11 --1(s c).36F-cl:r is ,A .r) ex°iansian - -10eAf 1c Tc5 -t+-I r4 r'�. ti c."ia --� L/ 7 CS C P _ -PTO -dam fib C b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor s' ctl°ie.s, that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. P o n e c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: H-c ( e. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. T9-f ete- r-) :"b 7/71467--- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. -f 7;s7. X 1 S`T((1c, IJt_t I L.4.91() �1►r� &4==.' sc m r -4 TbP of 1-3-t-a e t-£ec •.. ems., 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. He - e. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 1-4(:),-,e__ 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site p1 an. Yes . 11-1- Sii ES _ 6) Does the proposal waste materials to describe the type volume of discharge. involve any discharges of surface waters? If so, of waste and anticipated • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn., or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general "description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 1-4 -a 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. l a r e. Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. , LL- v.,..),6.TF -c25 • 4 ,M P -2_\ /Acx. S 1CI� s )CL.-U,0 (vim - oc>"1-1 n� S c P E-c> c \/f. 171-4 �. NA() (j) r, enc.> j sT .. • • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 'I-4c> d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: }owe_ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: iduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs �rass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? r»6. -,o j�J L V l��,r��s ✓F_ G� c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. tilo n Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 4e77cT W i . Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beave fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. i—lo n c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. is sib is w, l • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: t— nc, Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural` gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. .1-) �4ni ( LIT tLt, -. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. o c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: �negZc-i- U 'tom n(.74E 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health including exposure to toxic chemicals, ri and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, occur as a result of this proposal? describe. t-.lbr)� hazards, sk of fire that could If so, Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. t-AcD ���� 1- G� �!►C�S �i LLB � ��� ► ���. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or-control environ- mental health hazards, if any: +--r Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 4 lc c-I -� 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Sn".oc.-.,. LooC TP-s-j CT) or—, [.J 4-l-r vcg_— ri. o►S Cev-) fcx 'P&—CT P ©n .a t �n - -re (`�,..` bv.s Ls . 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. _ ,Gi 11-41 c:=LD , c. Describe any structures on the site. • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 1-qc> e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? c r✓`. (fRDf2dvleptcAr N1. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?' Li c-n )•-) T 10 470S"1 c,A (_. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? 1--1"P-1-C) g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. IS fC E n-r- -i --)-- p���' ��-� • dt��sLd -• Evaluation for Agency Use Only i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 4=z)(''16-)--/ Lt, Cyl Fib ( T) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1,--lotnel. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N4-)e. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? I- 1c,np. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Nor) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: -cne 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? airc.., t-I-r '7( LL__) a eN • - LI, (-) (__T 4 e-- ,t--1-i kij-C.: , b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ;mod na. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: L,- - p 5cp '4 nct � • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? (JO ) L. L . IPreoJ ► --if:› ► n "fH -l° 41 v 74-"e b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? - c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? t Job 2 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational tunities are in the immediate vicinity? A,,p..3ACr=4-5/— C—z 1=iL) Novo S i`►,�Tt 7g° _ 1 C •r) oppor- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. He c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 1—Ic5 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Mar) e.. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation . a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit s top? fk o Tj ns How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). c e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. icy f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ti, (,ov -4-- �o ()L "F le 4- i T it 1 rl -E-:- rN7r r:V=A-4(JegY 791-41ps z4,41.1- g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project .result in an increased need for public services (for example:. fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. IN-05 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. _ Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Ci e 'liti= urr e ect 'city, natura gas, telephone, sanitary sew -r septic sys em, • er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or:in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. '_ G, �T G- c nQ 0101 .�..c ► {-kD 4 t 6 1.�[o�i �icpTic,fl ez3F EX ism ,` •�1 � 5 C. Signature (31-1 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its .-ci ion. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANO E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS • Evaluation for Agency Use Only The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? to FX ✓1 0 1=Xi .1 1 -4F,ac1 L.ITt�S 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 1--Ic� -)� F--? ( ees. 6/) S 1 c.r l cot -I P1 U( )RA717 o()S 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: T}-) -7tz.,( 4 v'\1 o C.-31-WtS r oc Tam f6LLea .) 11-4 I of -1) i A m. , Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Ho cor— IFLtcy LS Ti C t PAT�—P Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflicts) are: None -23- •:" . . +_, ,_ ted per separate permit and a proval of the•Factory.Mutual En ineering. Company and the Tukwila Fire Department, F lanes,. hydrant location and pr tive devices shall be .. submitted concurrently for requiredapprovals. :,:. • • ,. • .„_,,. ..,,„. . 12. Mechanical and electrical systemsincluding,exteriurface and subgrade'imProvements, shall be submitted for separate permit.,',-:-.—: -.1!:. :', '- ':-' CITY OF TUKWILA - SITE VVEST VALLEY 4 1 . - • CITY OF KENT- SEC. 2 SEC. 35 • B4TH AVE • CITY OF RENTON S q 1 6 7 VICINITY MAP 0 2000 4000 6'1[10 sci"-rie 1 r ; Q,,, 1...r., 1 1 i 1.1.:11...) 1 • ; -. -- r ' „, 1 2 b 1986.! i orry o' PLANNING DEPT. il SHEET NO: ftIN El t