Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-349-86 - FOSTORIA PARK ANNEXATION - OFFICE AND WAREHOUSEFOSTORIA PARK ANNEX OFFICE / WAREHOUSE NE CORNER 133RD ST. & 42 "D ST. INTERSECTION EPIC 349 -86 Robert Storseth, Inc. 1805 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98405 Subject: EPIC: 349 -86 Dear Mr. Storsetht This letter is a follow-up to a letter dated November 20, 1986, wherein the City requested additional information and clarifiCatian on your proposal for the environmental review. Since we have not heard from you or a repre- sentative in over seven months, we assume the project is no longer active. If we do not receive the information requested within 15 days from the above date, the file will be closed. If in the future you choose to revive the proposal, you will be required t reapply for environmental review.` Moire Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner alp City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor November 20, 1986 Robert Storseth, Inc. 1805 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear Bob: After review of the checklist submitted for the project entitled "Foster Park Annex ", the following clarification and additional information is requested. It is unclear if the proposal is for.fill and an office facil- ity or if the proposal is just for filling and grading. Also, what is the ,timing of proposal for fill and grading or building construction? If you forsee the development of the subject property with a building, further information is necessary. SEPA specifies that impacts of a proposal be reviewed in total and that review not be conducted on a piecemeal basis. There are some specific concerns related to water availability, what sewer district will service the property, the effects of development on drainage on the area, and proposed permanent and temporary erosion control. Please submit a clarified proposal that addresses the immediate impacts of the fill and the future impacts of the proposed building. Please call Jack Pace in the Planning Department at 433 -1847 if you have any questions. Sincerely, MItia-6'2"i4) (n) Moira Carr Bradshaw Assistant Planner MCB/sjn CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN 86 -365 EPIC 349 -86 FILE Xag ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [] BLDG 0 PLNG. Q P.W. AFIRE 0 POLICE ri P & R PROJECT Fostoria Park Annex LOCATION NE Corner 133rd Street & 42nd Street IntersectiorFlLE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 10/22/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10/29/86 (Wednesday) STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 6,7#4/ OCT 2 31986 BY ... ... ............ wKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DATE // /'f (r (.! COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA 0 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN 86 -365 EPIC 349 -86 FILE 3987 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: T0: (0 BLDG 0 PLNG. Q P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE 0 P & R PROJECT Fostoria Park Annex LOCATION NE Corner 133rd Street & 42nd Street IntersectioTILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 10/22/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10/29/86 (Wednesday) STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT /9 U osk . E. y1% (loge e Pbes. 71"Cs4cI IT e III house ,'S J, L Ytotinouecd Q (�-o4nai,'),19-r/ felM/7L v O.) (1 I be rtegultwea. DATE ///K0/// COMMENTS PREPARED BY �i,C,1/41 C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTE• CN 86 -365 • EPIC 349 -86 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: [J BLDG 0 PLNG 0 P.W. [ FIRE POLICE n P & R PROJECT Fostoria Park Annex LOCATION NE Corner 133rd Street & 42nd Street IntersectiorFILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 10/22/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10/29/86 (Wednesday) STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT AT THIS STAGE OF THE PROJECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CONCERNS ARE ' OF A "WHAT IF NATURE: 1. PLACEMENT OF ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO SITE AND IMPACT TO TRAFFIC TRAVELING ON S 133 STREET AND S 42 AVE.. 2. LIGHT, GLARE AND NOISE SPILLOUT IMPACT ON RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY DIRECTLY TO THE WEST. 3. EMPLOYMENT OF LATEST SECURITY TECHNOLOGY AND CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN METHODS TO REDUCE CRIME VULNERABILITI AND THE RESULTING CALLS FOR POLICE SERVICES. HAVE DEVELOPER CONTA( CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONEER. 10/2R /R6 pjl DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN 86 -365 EPIC 349 -86 FILE Sla ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG ri P.W. n FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R PROJECT Fostoria Park Annex LOCATION NE Corner 133rd Street & 42nd Street IntersectiorFlLE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 10/22/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10/29/86 (Wednesday) STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT Mirni„ DATE e,/-5//e% COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ill CN 86 -365 EPIC 349 -86 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: n BLDG [] PLNG. n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n >P & R PROJECT Fostoria Park Annex LOCATION NE Corner 133rd Street & 42nd Street IntersectiorFlLE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 10/22/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10/29/86 (Wednesday) - STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE LOt/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM III CN EPIC FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: ED BLDG PLNG. 1.P.W. (l FIRE n POLICE n P & R DATE TRANSMITTED ; ;/, //t/ q/ /Y%7& STAFF COORDINATOR ('(947 % RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH. CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. PROJECT LOCATION F LE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /1 /'2' S'1 ITEM COMMENT 11__ 1.4E. Tc 11 PT( o1v PAC 3 'b S Nar 1) ,01 -ice 11,7 1:ENoA) tse-xi 1RviT ►2 rt go Mtn' LI-M .Y* CAvriviAtTt •s( 7-0/1/01/.10+-1 F\ 5Uf1(wuNDIL- w stt nu 3 P A O' a ANN AP PO gli w) — P f? I t k P %A sTi i p( vasty u S 35, VIA �11�15t� vlSri\l1k P kibe,L-SS . w fZ�rlew��tj1LtT% •1W Pltov . R-OJI'rCtY -g • - 1 O1 QA t y — CJI v 1'�,J okr. S-i bkVs oc�uf�R Iry lcl€ 1 - SD, ,S-1-LAN--- kViN,AkrONIvr,1 w . ft. AUK .Pc l= (( FUTU 4E DEJLD Post i —11 la p ow '' FsTLA ) >A 14-1) DATE �,�Sl`� ---� L'�COMMENTS. PREPARED BY t -sue c� W ( \l k --n Cl C.P.S. Form 11 S C U111--1` NILL o� c (Z-c-11")c " 7 A u`-)D 4 r :Cs r T • �� � s e(s • • NM ( Control No. g1 --�0- .IC C� Epic File No. AD 210 -�� Fee S100.00 Receipt No. 39 $ 7 1 O C T 2 1985 Ci.i', (» TUENV4I.RONMEeNTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING DEPT. A. BACKGROUND ' 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Fostoria Park Annex 2. Name of applicant: Robert Storseth, Inc. 3. Address -and phone number of applicant and contact person:Robert Storseth, 1805 136th Place S.E., Bellevue, Washington 98005 4. Date checklist prepared: October 20, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): November 1986 to February /March 1987 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Fill and grading To construct a future building 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? . If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Fill and Grading Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 32,500 ± square feet concrete and glass Dffic4c jwarehnuse on 114,5nn ± cq are font site. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See legal description attached and proposed site plan attached. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. TO BE•COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. EkViR l MENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, [other] gradual slope b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3 -4% ± c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils nn the cite range from good sand and gravel native to clay sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be approximately 19,500 c.y..of material placed. The material is from building "F ". Phase II1 Fnstnria Park Site_ South of 133rd Street. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? -If so, generally describe. Yes - erosion is possible during clearing and construction. AT1 soils will be stablized by landscaping and pavement for truck maneuvering and parking. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 60 - 80%. • • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: During constr fenre as required. After construction there will be_ nn erosion. 2. Air • 1 - • 11 .11 -41 11 - 1 1111 .11 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be some dust and vehicle emission during and after construction. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally • describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust from construction will be reduced—by keeping As required by thp City of Tukwila 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the .described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material' that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NA 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. All sewage will be collected and connected to existing s.s. lines in South 133rd S rlre . c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The runoff is from storm water and will be collected in on -site sheet retention ponds then will be drained at a controlled rate info existing storm system. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site surface retention. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: [alder] maple, aspen,[ other evergreen tree: [fir [cedar pine, other xr shrubs -XR' grass xr pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Site will be stripped as required J2y soils report per filling and grading c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping will match the general direction of the majority of Fostoria Park Developement to the best of our knowledge at this time. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, (ether:] starlings /crows -, etc. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy[ (electric, natural gas,]oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The natural gas and electricity will be'used_for_heati ng and cooling. Other requirements will be set at time the space isleased. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The proposed project will meet the requirements of the WA State Energy Code for heating. cooling. lighting. thermal insulation and glazing. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Because this buffing is spec. exact tenants are not known at this time. Tenants will be allowed in an M -1 zone. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services required. Standard tire and police protection- might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or.control environ- mAntal health hazards, if any: • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing yehirla traffic, none wh4eh wild ect- the prcLjart 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. long term- vehicle traffic will be the only noise hours- approx. 7:OOam to 6:00 pm short term- noise generated from construction proiect.hours- 7.004m to 4 :OOpm 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None_ 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? North, South. and East - Commercial West - Residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 1. - Existing house 1. - 2 Sheds unattached Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes_ A11 existing statures wiLUb demnlished in order to complete the final project_ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? .■1 -1 f.. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site ?industrial /commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The occupant load is not known at this time. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. , 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will meet with all comprehensive code and zoning to the best of our knowledge. • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. 1. middle income house c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None per A and B. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 21' + from finish floor. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Proposed project will be designed . to meet owner's needs and to provide as little as possible impact on the surrounding community., Evaluation for Agency Use Only • . 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Non -glare type wall pac lighting early hours during the winter and early afternoon in the winter. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Lights will be of specific non -glare type. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Community related services. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None, due to a. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None due to a. and b. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.. South 133rd Street Highway 99 b. Is the site, currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No - closest stop is on Interurban Avenue. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 35 spaces Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be.generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 70 vehicle trips - 7:00 to 9:00 am • 5:00 to 6:30 pm g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Car pools (possibly) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If s.o, generally describe. Yes. Fire. police and health care on an emergency hasis. Other services will prnhahly not he imparted except for greater revenue and tax hale_ b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None, Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: [electricity ][natural gas,l[water, ][refuse service,] elephone sanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrity for lighting, heating, A /C, and ventilation; natural gas for heating; water and telephone and sanitary sewer for typical office use. All the above utilities will be provided by the local utility company. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best my knowledge. I understand that the ead agency is relying on them to ake its dec. ion. APF Signature: Date Submitted: of Evaluation for Agency Use Only •• LEGAL DESCRIPTION • The land referred to is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Tract 48, Riverside Interurban Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington, lying north of South 133rd Street (W. W. Beck Road) ; and That portion of Tract 18, Fostoria Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, in King County, Washington, lying north of South 133rd Street (W. W. Beck Road); TOGETHER WITH vacated 43rd Avenue South (Squire Street) adjoining.