The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-35-90 - TONY ROMA'S - RESTAURANTTONY ROMA'S- DEMO EXISTING BLDG., BUILD NEW RESTAURANT & SITE IMPROVEMENTS 17305 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. EPIC -35 -90 Geo Engineers Hovland Architects, P.S. 33516 Ninth Avenue South Building Number 7 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Attn: Mr. Imad Bahbah RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIIA OCT 17 1951 PERMIT CENTER October 11, 1991 Geotechnical Considerations Proposed Rockery Tony Roma's Restaurant 17305 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington File No. 2113 - 001 -BO1 INTRODUCTION Geotechnical, Geoenvironmental and Geologic Services This letter provides geotechnical considerations for a proposed rockery to be constructed during the site development for the new Tony Roma's restaurant in Tukwila, Washington. Our firm previously prepared a geotechnical engineering report dated August 2, 1991 for the new restaurant building. We understand that it is desired to expand the existing parking lot which is located north of the railroad tracks that traverse the property. It is proposed that a portion of the toe of the hillside along the western margin of the property be excavated and a rockery constructed along the cut face. We did not evaluate the subsurface conditions in this area during our previous study for the proposed building. At your request, we visited the site on October 10, 1991 to observe the site conditions in the vicinity of the proposed rockery as a basis for providing geotechnical engineering considerations for the proposed rockery. The extent of these observations was limited because of the vegetative cover on the hillside. GeoEngineers, Inc. 8410 154th Avenue N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Telephone (206) 861 -6000 Fax (206) 861 -6050 Geo ✓ Engineers Hovland Architects, P.S. October 11, 1991 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS The existing slope in the subject area is extremely overgrown such that surface features are not readily apparent. Based on the topographic information provided to us, the existing slope inclination varies .between about 1.5H:1V (horizontal to vertical) and 2H :1V. Our evaluation is based on the soil conditions observed in shallow hand excavations, probing with a 1/2 -inch steel rod, and discernable surface features along the slope where the rockery would be constructed and the slope immediately south of this location. It appears that the soil conditions in the vicinity of the proposed rockery consist of dense sand and hard silt. These two units may be interbedded, although the conditions along the slope to the south of the proposed rockery (where the vegetation is minimal and the surficial conditions more readily apparent) indicate that a relatively uniform sand deposit overlies the silt deposit. The slopes appear to be stable. The soil units exposed have excellent supporting characteristics for either a rockery or a retaining wall. The types of vegetation present on the slope suggests that considerable ground water seepage occurs in the lower portion of the sand layer directly above the silt contact and possibly from interbedded sandy zones within the silt. ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION Based on the conditions exposed in the vicinity of the proposed rockery and our experience with construction along this hillside, we believe that construction of a rockery as proposed is feasible. It must be kept in mind that rockeries essentially serve as protection against erosion and minor sloughing along cuts into otherwise stable slopes and provide little "retaining" support. Any significant surcharge loading above a rockery or seepage conditions within native soils behind a rockery can lead to distress or failure of the rockery -faced slope. The potential need for maintenance of rockeries should be recognized. We recommend that the rockery be constructed in accordance with "The Association of Rockery Contractors Standard Rockery Construction Guidelines." The definition for the rock sizes (e.g., three -man rock) are included in the referenced guidelines. A minimum 4- inch - diameter drain pipe Primed nn ■orvrled n >nn• • • Geo�✓ Engineers Hovland Architects, P.S. October 11, 1991 Page 3 should be installed behind and at the base of the rockery to collect any seepage from the hillside. This pipe must be tightlined to the storm sewer. The base elevation of this drain should be lower than the parking lot so that seepage from the hillside does not flow onto the pavement or into the base course beneath the parking lot pavement. We expect that additional drainage provisions will not be necessary if the cut face for the rockery occurs totally within hard silt. However, if the overlying sand unit or zones of sand interbedded within the silt unit are exposed in the cut for the rockery, additional provisions to maintain positive drainage should be anticipated. Specific adjustments should be made based on the conditions encountered during the excavation. It is critical that the filter material behind the rockery consist of a well - graded material to prevent the uniform sands. from "piping" through the. rockery. Alternatively, it may be appropriate to use a woven fabric that has a relatively high burst strength and relatively high permeability. If additional provisions are needed to control seepage flows installation of a geotextile on the face of the cut such as Mirafi 700X or equivalent may be appropriate. No subsurface explorations have been accomplished to determine soil conditions along the proposed cut face or base of the excavation for the rockery, as noted above. We recommend that we be retained to evaluate the, subsurface conditions encountered during the excavation to determine if the soils exposed are as anticipated and are suitable for the proposed rockery and to provide additional or alternative recommendations, should this be necessary. We suggest that a contingency be included in the budget for the site development should modifications to the rockery or change to a structural retaining wall be necessary. 0 0 0 13,1..na o e ioa • • Geoff Engineers Hovland Architects, P.S. October 11, 1991 Page 4 We trust this letter serves your current needs. Please call if you have any questions regarding this letter or other aspects of the project. ) /4/ `SfONl: "; • j� `EXPIRES /0//4. -- I JRG:JKT:ira Two copies submitted Printed nn r?rvrIcd nanr• Yours very truly, GeoEn ers, Inc. J. Robert Gordon, .E. S l ngineer ttle, P.E. cipal • • 2' WIDE MIN ASPHALT TRANSITION TROUGH /SPLASH APRON. PLACE AROUND CB GRATE 4 MATCH EXISTING 18" CMP. 8" MIN. THICKNESS OF 4" -2" QUARRY SPALL 1" MINUS WASHED ROCK 6" PERF. PIPE -� CONNECT TO CB 010 FILTER FABRIC MIRAFI 1OOX OR EQUAL SEE SEC. 5.01 TMC 4 CS. 4' -6" PAY LIMITS EXCAVATION ONLY L CONCEPTUAL CUT SECTION ROCKUJALL DETAIL NTS NOTE: SECTION IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY. CONTRACTOR/INSTALLER 51.4ALL SUBMIT DETAILED.DESIGN 4 CALCULATIONS TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CON5TI3JCTION OF WALL SYSTEM. FIN. GRADE RECEIVED CITY OF TI )KWILA OCT 1 7 1991 PERMIT CENTER • PWF0103 PACWEST FOODS TONY ROMA'S TUKWILA 10 -16 -91 DESIGN SURFACE , REFERENCE SURFACE COORDINATE FILE = 410.CRD T -NET FILE = 410B.TNT Page 1 COORDINATE FILE = 410.CRD T -NET FILE = 410A.TNT CUT FILL ET BANK VOLUMES (cubic yards) x,394:39 Z§17 05-5811 g519953 "--"" "--:•"C T `"'""" FILL NO CHANGE SURFACE AREAS (square feet) 14847.142 26869.618 3549.705 (acres) • .341 .617 .081 AVERAGE DEPTHS (feet) • .717 .919 WHOLE SITE GRADED AREA ADJUSTMENT TO BALANCE (feet) -.310 -.337 /U 6/FG NtS/ 60/(0 /'- /1_ 1 PeoPos6.5C) RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA UC1l 1 7 1 bi PERMIT CENTER .1 I i U i1 V i l O F O I S I R L B U T I O N 0 1, DIANN MARTINEZ hereby declare that: 0 Notice of Public Hearing [] Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet J Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [] Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit Determination of NonsignificanCe 0 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance (] Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice (] Notice of Action Q Official Notice O Other O Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on SEE ATTACHED Name of Project TnNV RnbA File Number EPIC -35 -90 NOVEMBER 15, 1990 , 19 . CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 TUKWILA, WA SOUTHCENTER 9 8 LVD. 88 (206) 433 -1800 O: J.L. PACIFIC I ENGR, INSPECTOR SPECTTOR .L. P.O. BOX 24406 98124 SEATTLE, WA. OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1800 TO: Gregory P. Hazard 2115 South 56th. St. tacoma, Wa. 98409 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1800 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SECTION CENTRAL OPERATIONS PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY CAMPUS MAIL STOP PV -11 OLYMPIA, WA. 98504 -8711 WAC 197 -11 -970 • • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Demolition of existing Plush Pippin restaurant and build new 6,200 square foot restaurant and improve site landscaping, parking and access. Proponent Gregory P. Hazard for Pac West Foods Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 17305 Southcenter Parkway Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 39 -90: Tony Roma The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 0 There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is, issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by 30 November, 1990 The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address Phone 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila,, k. 98188 Date �� J ,7 Signatur You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS • • SEPA CONDITIONS EPIC FILE - 39 -90: TONY ROMA 1. Conduct a hydrological study using NGV Datum. Analyze surrounding drainage in North Canyon pipeline /overflow system, Southcenter Boulevard and Minkler Boulevard to determine if site is within 100 year floodplain and a flood zone control permit is necessary . 2. Conduct a geotechnical study to determine necessary foundation and site preparation procedures. ' 'ITY OF TUKWILA _PARTMENT OP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . % ARdfng . planning l Pub, ROJECT f L mo f ENVIRONIVIiiITAL REVIEW ROUTIm'G FORM DDRESS 3D EPIC: 3511 q g >9s.. >w S 3.,�3L �l� i. k�i"d' '� k�•r��s� Poi . at�tslR&. kt tJ Y s /ll-d--- (aaefsenr Picjporeglit6 ATE TRANSMITTED 3 a r ESPONSE REQUESTED BY IAFF COORDINATOR ,pY0. 5f22//, DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED 'TEM November 13, 1990 COMMENT Page 3, Item 10 - Add the following to the existing comments: Grade and Fill Permit, Geotechnical /Hydrological Study to determine grade and fill approved by Building and Public Works. (FCZ permit may be required based on Geological /Hydrological Study). Utilities Permits - Curb Cut /Access Permit - Railroad review and ap- provals of access across their tracks per current standards for this redevelopment. Page 5, Item 3, a., 1) - Change "No" to the following: North Canyon drainage and overflow system has year round flows. Page 6 Item 5) - Instead of "No" answer provide following: Hydro- logical Study using (NGV Datum) and analysis of surrounding drainage in North Canyon pipeline /overflow system /Southcenter Parkway and Minkler Boulevard will determine if any portion of site is within 100 year flood plain (Note: Flooding in January 9, 1990 caused shutdown of restaurant for one working day. PF /amc:7:Roma ate: 1( 113 ( q,,5 Comments prepared by: 09114/09 ENVIRONM TAL REVIEW °\) ROUTI�G FORM !ITV OF TUKWILA PARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'Planninc EPIC: IOJECT DDRESS ATE TRANSMITTED it rnteet /990 ESPONSE REQUESTED BY /,1 /eb-ifilyb TAFF COORDINATOR A &ya rG C alegai DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED • shed; environmental checklist. was received `regarding "this prole ct.'1ease rQview oomment below to;advise the responsible official' regarding the threshold'determinatiorl.q''11- enyironrcental review: file is available in. the Planning Department through the above` toff oardiinator. > Corr ments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning "Comri)isstoc of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment. section betty, 'TEM COMMENT rate :. Lic7/-% Comments prepared by: 09114/011 ENVIRONM�t TAL REVIEW ROUTIiQG FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EPIC: 3 ADDRESS / 7365' 05kedyezr- //ea/ DATE TRANSMITTED S' iur �geic /990 STAFF COORDINATOR �YQ 1 r (ROA $660/217' ESPONSE REQUESTED BY /�l�7l/D DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED / ..:5. ': _ .. �>. ¢. .. _.: F�,.- ',:.h< w .kK. 2 Y a '• ,mac/" cbed' er�vlronmental checklist was received re ardin This.. ro`ect. Please review ment:below to. adv'se the• „responsible official:regardmg the ;threshold deteiNnation� Th yironrmental ..................... in the •Plannng Department•throu h the above staff o nator. Comments.regardmg the`project you;wish carried;to the Plannln omm�sstor • ` of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted fn the eomm nt section ion :eew ITEM COMMENT th G'4iLL�'I�it9�' Date:. /�,U1/ Y /99() Comments prepared by: ! G�,� e ilikhke(r- o91141811 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTIN'G FORM 'ITV OF TUKWILA EPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' r ROJECT EPIC: Y.3 aj� .L•.fu �./>3'! xT�• xw; �e�rA?:: Police ! arf Cs1Ri DDRESS ATE TRANSMITTED _cit%1i 113 21 9i0 TAFF COORDINATOR k,DNYa_, 45rad ESPONSE REQUESTED BY /,1,ter/c/!/Q DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED 'he f ch'ad environmental checklist. Was received regarding •thisproject. h'Iease review • Comment below to advise the. responsible: official` regarding the thresholcddet rminatiarl.o'1 enyironmental review. file is available in the Planning Department:throughthe above st coordictator.:Cornmonts regarding the project you wish carried: to the Plannrng"Commiss oct Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the •Comment aectiori belpw�' ITEM COMMENT 4 • a nviwa6 deimo� P ate :. jWyd Comments prepared by: , LV Contr4IPNo. Epic File No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Tony Romas Restaurant 2. Name of applicant: Gregory P. Hazard for Pac West Foods . . 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2115 South 56th St. Tacoma, WA 98409 Attn:Gregory P. Hazard 4. Date checklist prepared: 11 October 1990 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): BAR: early December, Permits: submit in January 1991 Construction: as soon as permits are issued. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO • 1 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. City of Tukwila Building Permits King County Health Department approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this - checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The naa Tones Romas in Tukwila will be a 6200 s.f. restaurant with site improvements for landscaping and 72 parking spaces. The building will be a single story structure with wood frame structure_san._cj_P - synthetic stucco exterior finish. Site improvements include lands aping, and upgrade of the parking lots (as wellas adding some parking). Demo of the existing building is part of this pro osal. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this. checklist. .The project is l ocatpd_ at 17105 05 Snuthrpntpr Parkway, Tiikt i 1 a (thp rvrrcnt P1 itsh Pippin' site) 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO ..iTO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er Slight slope up from street to west. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? approx. 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. From a 1976 soils report: "20 to 25 feet of peat over medium dense grading to very dense granular soils ". d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes – the existing structure is showing.,••.. signs of settlement. The adjacent building (Ethan Allen) is built on piles: Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. r gnop ue, C6.Ur' /Al %/] Ta Ah6V / /tU S Lrtl ovs, s) - — Nb i a✓,2d/LT f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Not significantly. Erosion control will be in place prior to and during earthwork. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? building = 11.5 7 asphalt = 57 ' , 70 sidewwalk= 4.5 L/0 Total = 73 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control approved by City — erosion barricre and the like as approved. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal, typical constrction related types temporarily. The finsihed product would be typical for a restaurant. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • =ion if necessary the site can be s rinklered. ThP finished product will comply with all applicahlP codes concerning emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NO • i Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would. be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO . Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No._ 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be collected thru catch basins and discharged into the City storm system. Runoff is from the building, parking areas,.._and sidewalks. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. NO d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site det .tLt .ter , i crharaad i n1-n City system_ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X, deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing will be modified for improvements to site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NO • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas will be used for heating, food preparation, and heating water. Cooling is electrical. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The systems are designed by competent engineers to assure efficiency. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special provisions required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? e 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: construction related. Long term: none. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short term: construction will be only during day hours. Long term: N/A 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? current rice. restaurant Adja en t_• W t — vac'aht Fast - chrippi ng ranter /rpstaiirant Nnrth — restaurant South — furniture store b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not recently. c. Describe any structures on the site. Plush Pippin — restaurant • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The existing restaurant will be ---deolished" or The new one. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? regional Retail Bussiness If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 20:to 25 full & .Rart time employees Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? j• NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NnnP nPrPssary 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N[A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Approx. 23' Synthetic stucco ( "dryvit ") b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None nece..&ary • 11. Light and Glare iEvaluation for Agency Use Only a. What type of light or glare will the proposal. produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No more than the existing building. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not likely c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: _ —None proposed 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None, unless the vicinity" b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on - recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None necessary • II Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not npo scary 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. £he site is adjacent and west of Southcenter Parkway. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes — within 300' c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 72 total /none eliminated. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Nn f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. _ -$T Pmt- e g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: One curbcut has been eliminated as it was poorly placed and poorly designed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None necessary Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. iliti rrently available b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Same as those indicatcd in 16.a. above. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Ad cA64 SC A! Ai aNIAdi!~ 04 IA Peg Signature: �I� ` �' ` %� . /'��idwohxy••AS /;RcilitacTS/PS. /c/ 2/9 2.°G'214-127/ Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? TVS pltaPrbM. 13 somelyt}pt- � 6 A4 Lt. THAN 'ftliZ E' I ("TIN 4 Q EST'P•AZA4' Proposed - measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NEW , Mo14 eflAG It'4 at'sK.J foga cvwa ST14Jc. /0.4 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? MowE ,aN - . £ ,41S77•4. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: -nit SIit IS c,L AuT A'Co • IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resQurPC ? X LJICrr Ci 414%04t CARS ?'b f oNC1744.). • Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: sift GI rsArr 064140 C G.4AL✓4.utre • r.),/ AEA644 % LdyUE . 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: ,vor NECessAozy 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: '<VA How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. Now would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Trig P,eaobsg'D /P-J7 / $ 1404 AA T7'4Q tnE o• /T w,.t. AL4244tAr 54410•( iN4 M.5 /44 00.4i4A4S Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demands) are: 4'W4 0.4 t'aU(.ITit.) 0404 iii0t4uA7g 1a etCGdOt•pAa1e pp..% pfit4ASAL, 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. rr 06ES Nar. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? N° Proposed measures to avoiJ or reduce the conflict(s) are: 1y ti► .TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? TO O y« A J 4!4) /2447AJA4 . 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? move rs A»3P77tict srT$. C ?) 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred curse of action: t • '0be t/�1A'S r/M , IS Afar A nu ei - e Q vAter ARdcl6c -T • TICE E Pde/bS ED TOAIY A 4)1 (A. ■ MPAove THe lAtri Iw-g _ Esf • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Ala Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- Western Union Ran Spurl(xl -fd). PLANT MATERIALS LIST SYMBOL QUANTITY BOTANICAL NAME T R E AGF AS: - -BA • CDA CFR - PA 'PS . 'PR TE . TP S H R ANC CSCE CSC . EAC MB' ND . PF PFF RAE -RJM RDA TPEG. 'YR Co5 G R 0 • HH COT COMMON NAME 'SIZE Es 12 ACER'GINNAIJI FLAME' FLAME AMUR MAPLE 11/2" Cal. 5 ' ACER SACCHARUM'GREENSPIRE CREENSPIRE SUGAR MAPLE 11/2" Cal. . 3 - BETULA ALBA (clump) WHITE BIRCH 3 -stem clump11 /2" • • CEDRUS DEODARA AUREA GOLDEN DEODAR CEDAR 7'epeciman 1. CORNUS FLORIDA RUBRA PINK FLO. DOGWOOD. 11/2" Cal. - - .•6'. PRUNUS-AREBONO DAYBREAK CHERRY- 11/2" Cal. 6 PINUS SYLVESTRIS SCOTCH PINE 8'speciman - 22 PYRU5 REDSPIRE - . REDSPIRE FLO. PEAR 11 /2•Cal, 9 TILIA EUCHLORA CRIMEAN LINDEN 21/2•Cal -specima 26 THUJA- PLICATA WESTERN RED CEDAR 18- 6',8 -8' U'B S 10 AZALEA' NINO CRIMSON-'• . :SAME • '15• 11. .CORNUS STOLONIFERA CREAM EDGE- RETWIG DOGWOOD- 24 ". ..17 • CUPRESSUS SEMP. GLAUCA BLUE..ITALIAN CYPRESS.. 5' 33. EUONYMUS - ALATUS COMPACTA DWP :.BURNING BUSH . 21" 6 MAHONIA BEALEI LEATHER LEAF MAHONIA 10 NANDINA:DOMESTICA • • HEAVENLY BAMBOO 24• :36 PHOTINIA FRAZERI . -ERASERS 'PHOTINIA 24 "• • 52 PIERIS FOREST ;FLAME SAME 21" • •11• -.RHODODENDRON ANAH KRUSCKE SAME - '24 ". 14 . . JEAN-.MARIE MONTAGUE -SAME - 21•" - 13 - DORA AMATEIS' SAME 21 " -. •8 f THUJA PYRAMIDALIS EMERALD GREEN COL. ARBORVITAE - 17 YUCCA. RECURVIFOLIA YUCCA I I I - Cart0derio Sabmo . - • • ' Amon Gross - • U N D C O V E R per plan HEDERA HELIX'HAHNI -HAHNS IVY 21/4" pots @ 12" oc. .per plan cotoneaster.-transplanted from on site 'NOTES . . 6" minus postsr/ riper rock That portion of Stie .outhe•at quarter of the .eathe•ot quarter, if Section 26 Tormehlp 23 North, Range 4-Bt, W. N.'In the City of N '5.6511•, i ee ng'COUnty,- Na.hington described as follow. beginning at the ..0.66.0.1 corner of maid southeast quarter of the seethv.st gw.t•r; thence . 67 •49'57. N along the .oath lie. of said roath...t qu•iter of.t a eouthwe.1 q .61•'5.0. of 461.05 feet to the w.et•eargln af..cethOant.r.P•rkway; thena.'•.11.39.33• • along •.1d •t'e•t910 •.dla•ne. Of 630.58 feet; thence eont1Yleg along ..id- vow N•r 19 •Long a cur.e to the right newton • radio. of 991.37 fee an w0 dL*t.nre 6f 727,20 feat throph • o•etr.l _anion at 7.0eNa "; thYei,N,p)•0t'35. 6 along meld weep .ar(j1n a dletanc..o( 74:95 fo.t to tee true pint •at 6plenl.9; theme . 05 "01120• -N • dl.t•np.f of 69.00 feet; thence • 01.06.35.1 • distant. of 12.00 feet; thence N 06.51i0V ".11 • b1•t.no. of 36.00 feet; 661.0. 5 03.09'35" no 181.11e4'46 12.00,1.86; th.me.'11186•51'29• W • 40.6.0.. of 195.64 feet to tlu Center of • railroad Yee.ent; thence northeasterly • alang..al0 ,..11ree! ......nt en •',eurve to the right• 'the' renter of which bear. 6 56 "1S "51" E having., radios of .410.20 feet, .n arc dist.ne• of 102.00 feet through 9•c.,tral.•.gl. of 14'14 V0•; thence V'12•20i30" • • dlat•nce of 33,36 feet; bli.nce • .4.34'26• 8 a dl.tone.• of 50.16 feet; thence 0 03.41'39 " 1. • 41.60... of-54.76 feet-to the-eort6 line of . ld .0566Y1 quarter of the southwest q th.noe 5 67•55.5360b •long Yld north line • 4leteec. of 250.00 feet to tl.r went ..ogle of 80.thp.t.r I thence a W •0,'35. 11 •long•.064 vest margin • distance of 211.33 feet-to the true point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION MaNOM %ewes -4ti- - -.- -B 49 3'O 13/. 31P .T.9 34 3` ST • C c C. Nam s; w.iwr is rot /P4 3fFF 476E6 IMMO rtavr /AM . P. SE 6A L1 STD 3 ar. 6J 94 ee 1. All plants shall conform to AAN standards for nursery - stock. - .2. The :Landscape Architect reserves the right to make plant substitutions based on availability.' No substitutions will be made vithout.prior approval. 3. Fill for mounded bed areas-shall-be approved by LA. . 4. All plants shall be guaranteed for one year. - 5. All plantings shall conform to the minimum-requirements of the City of Tukvila 6.. Planting beds shall receive 2 ". of .Nutramulch or equal as -a topdressing. -7. Shrubs- and -Trees to be pruned. as. directed 'by LA.. YF etle0 DuMYSTFI.' new ca -45'0C 7PE6 . T-1P orznet we,-(= 20' VICINITY MAP 3 4 J 6) B 9 k3 Pao Pa. imeht. /PS LE515 34hr 5; .pnuofT, ruvr m7MM , 4RJM -, rj 1 Enii CA0t'�sg4Da; atwrnwM L - co.is46D outoOOR 4 . w/srn HG-A(4A • • / III---- --"""f STD S7r ll . !'. 19' SOW • I TTt: (AMl/•1.1 4'PL:.* B'� ib'-� JR4K Se Fay 'se aA'K lye= _ room. inane Planting D•tait CI /WWI Tram :Planting Datalt_ II la la SI •1W ..wee � ' a dr.!•I� Je. ta'r`e it i e•J.w-oe•e•e..- Tausen... I•eaiw. A /..� \/fees'- �711AIr...on=" ''• u�j ,,p, Yera••• ••••vs V V`V�'r VV•VY'V Y"- ,.Wa JV ■i �� r� wee. {gp 12EME EIM�� ME eli- itaiNS SEMI IM9 1 RNIEWM I 3 -84 /duwtm/ // CSCE N'1EMW.MANr RAMM NOTES: • POOJECT /ADDRESS: '.Tony Roma's, -•A Place 17305 South Center Tukwila, .Washington OWNER: PaC •6st-P00ds 2115 South 56th (205) Tacoma, WA 98409 Attn, Gregory P. Hazard 206- 475 -2180 9 -9E 33EAC- MornO '.,t7", /aSe7/4/ ufr gE'zuMir+ATao. Southcenter -Parkway • for Ribs" ARCHITECT:• - - .Bovland/Thoms Architects; P8 . 33400 8t6 Avenue South (126) federal Way, WA 98003 . Attn: 81068.1 E. Hovland, AIA 206- 674 - 9272.., LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: I. The Roper Company - 32701 30th Avenue SW • Federal Nay, 01 98003 Attn: Dale 8oper,'ASLA . 206 -874 -2064 ' P.�: tAsst;ie NJr SITE PLAN / LANDSCAPE PLAN Hart: E -LTOTd = LICO►f •sr0 foR PApAr.s , /i(ISlls BUILDING EXISTING USE: PFOPOS6D USE: SETBACKS: BUILDING 0411 ZONE. C -2', Community Retail Restaurant • Restaurant Front Yard • 20' -0•. Side Yard • 10" -0• Rear Yard • 10' -0" Allowed • 35' -0" Proposed 23' -0• (to top of- parapet) PASSING: Required • 18pace /100 08P or 6118 - 100 • 61.2• r • Provided • 20 Compact (2881 50 Standard 2 Barrier -fre- 72 TOTAL Provided BUILDING NOTES: Bldg. Area • 6,118 g.s.f. Type Const • Vtl Occupancy • A -3- • • 0 5 to 2a .30 Hovlend/TMmn9 Afcidtects 208.874 -9272 -Park Center 1 /West Campus • 33400 8th Avenue South Suite 128 - • Federal Way, WA 98003. Architecture/Urban Planning • • Tor ■ A- PLACE 'FOR RIBS, 17305 Southcenter Pkwy Tukwila, Washington Revisions Date Item . 3 4 5 7 10 issue A B.A.R. suarirTTAL Sheet Contents S)e/ NO-r54 /44 i LS4.044 ' L)?? 121990 CITY OF TUKWILA pLANNING DEPT. Job N0. 9056 Sheet Drown By OR /Mt4 Ia /iC /.5o .'r • Otis ...F.„-ac 6 : ?-vim • Ci'iElN REces,r_O vidN f51Jp • •' !1 L. CS O• fic7 3 0 C.oLLMnl9 c RGiL4G �Yfr ,+c71G E:iUC. C '`F. - .JxG.- I!R7I•LITE ..11.46. 4 •cri:.?_*N VINYL c•Jr.1 • a&CKu1. WEST ELEVATION Hovland/Thomas Architects . '206-874 -9272 Park Canter I/ W.$t Campus . 33400 8th Avenue South Sults 126 Feeanl War: WA 98003, •Architecture /Urban Plamiin9 TONYROMAS (4A PLACE FOR Rms.) 17305 Southcenter Pkwy: Tukwila, .Washington Project/ /Notes Revisions No. Data' Item 3 S 10 6/•R. 5,16•i • 7TVl- Job No 90o6. Drawn er 18 • Chaekw 9r H M Data 10/2,10 Diu EU P.yGA ; - G''. 4 • p l'L mac. lit ''571_. C/il:Or:c9 Hovland Architects-AIA 218.874 -9272 Park Center I /West Ceoprn 33400 8111 Menu. South Suit. 128 Federal War, WA 98003 Architecture /Urban Planning.-.. 17305 Southcenter Pkwy.'. TukwHa, Washington Revisions No. Date Item MUM 2 3 4 5 10 Meet Con .sots_ 21990i .. art of 7JICWILA PLANNING DEPT. ELEVATION K41. :i.e.. Job No. q0 JC+ Drawn By 16 . Checked By r1H • Delo :OA 94.