The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-351-86 - THE CAFARO COMPANY - ANDOVER PARK PLAZAANDOVER PARK PLAZA- DEVELOPMENT OF SHOPPING MALL STRANDER BLVD. & ANDOVER PARK WEST (TUKWILA POND) EPIC 351 -86 • IWI THE CAFARO COMPANY February 23, 1987 Mr. Rick Beeler Associate Planner CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Dear Mr. Beeler: LEGAL NOTIFICATIONS IL.I�!y � f .. l�!) ��; F[: �> 2C 987, L., J 2C 3 Ci Y t.;;"= "i ?.1Ktiv!LA PLANNING DEPT. Please be advised that I would like to be put on any mailing list for legal notification required by the SEPA laws for comprehensive plan change, admendments and /or hearings, rezone hearings, planning commission meetings, or any examiner hearings in your local government jurisdiction. If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to call. Send notifications to: R. A. Jackimowicz THE CAFARO COMPANY 2445 Belmont Avenue P. 0. Box 2186 Youngstown, Ohio 44504 Phone: (216) 747 -2661 Sincerely yours, Robert A. Jac icz Development P er RAJ /pab cc: Phil Richley Ed Cronin File 2445 Belmont Ave. • P.O. Box 2186 • Youngstown, Ohio 44504-0186 • (216) 747 -2661 FACT SHEET PROJECT TITLE: Andover Park Plaza PROPOSED ACTION: The proposal is for a mixed -use retail- office development to include two major retail tenants and small shops totaling square feet and square feet of office space. As proposed, site • s Wire 5, SUBJECT TO REVISIO Ct•i `c .. • . _..� PLANNt C preparation for construction would involve draining and filling acres of the existing 19.5 acre pond and associated wetlands that comprise over one -half the site area. PROJECT LOCATION: The project site, also known as Tukwila Pond site, is located at the southwest corner of Strander Boulevard and Andover Park West in Tukwila, Washington. See Appendix for a legal description. ACTION SPONSOR: The Cafaro Company 2445 Belmont Avenue P.O. Box 2186 Youngstown, OH 44504 LEAD AGENCY: City of Tukwila RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Mr. L. Rick Beeler, Planning Director AND CONTACT PERSON Mr. Jack Pace Department of Planning City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Bldvd. Tukwila, Washington COMMENTS: All comments on this Draft Environmental Impact Statement should be addressed to: Mr. L. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, at the above address. REQUIRED LICENSES AND PERMIT: Filling and Grading Permit Hydraulic Project Approval (Washington State Dept. of Game) Section 404 Permit (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) Building Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit Occupancy Permit PRINCIPAL CONTRIBUTORS AND LOCATION OF BACKGROUND DATA: The City of Tukwila Planning Office directed preparation of this document pursuant to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act. The following firms provided supporting research and analysis: R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. 1300 Alaska Building 2nd & Cherry Seattle, WA 98104 (Environmental Analysis and Report Preparation) Contact: Robert W. Thorpe (206) 624 -6239 Stepan & Associates, Inc. 33505 - 13th Place S. Federal Way, WA. 98003 (Engineering and Planning) Contact: Kent J. Stepan, P.E. (206) 682 -4771 John Graham Associates 520 Pike Street Seattle, WA 98101 (Architectural Design) Contact: Mr. James C. Pearce (206) 447 -5600 •;- James & Moore 155 N.E. 100th Street, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98125 (Soils /Geotechnical Study) Contact: Joseph Lamont, Jr., Senior Partner James B. Harakas, P.E., Associate (206) 523 -0560 Entranco Engineers 5808 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. #200 Kirkland, WA 98033 (Transportation Study) Contact: John N. Perlic, Project Engineer (206) 827 -1300 DATE OF ISSUE: DATE AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING: COMMENT DEADLINE: DATE OF FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY: COPIES AVAILABLE FROM: City Hall City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 575 -8299 REVIEW COPIES ARE AVAILABLE.FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AT: Tukwila Library 14475 59th Avenue. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 Table of Contents Fact Sheet List �f Figures List of Tables I. Summary II. Alternatives including the Proposed Action III. Affected Environment, Significant Impacts and Mitigating Measures A. Natural Environment 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants and Animals B. Built Environment 1. Land Use 2. Noise 3. Aesthetics 4. Light and Glare 5. Transportation 6. Public Services and Utilities References Distribution List Appendices A. Scoping Determination B. Biological Evaluation of Tukwila Pond C. Geotechnical Investigation "THE MU UCIPAUUTT Of METROPOEITAH ,• SEATTLE GOES it VaF MIT = OR GD RAHT.EE THE :.ACCt1RACT OP COMPLETENESS OF THE -t1ATA Sho UEAE OW "... ... 4 :,.....„h u . ••••• c course) O ON tt CZ" Ct Sac/ ./eaturr avoi courry co: ww :Da or s7s ces • rw�vec 10 COQC pap •■56, .l4 4.0 , rant: 1 worwr ...0AOIr Clt:tarillt•Osinsc► ar7RM .Q •5•c6/ rfaa,r_afnv escarp** MOW wmrE$ 7?Oc 6 4AIIUT Ata. aarr►t r• m.1�I0, •4..K Oar COMM,. sue.,.: 7e. WM ~OW, dLAM7•O.r Qpp •r . AL4C/Aall 4ttx41.7 cosmoses. MVf.NNT o1M( 1 MST .. .S te.S ir! /MKntial • !!r L•F.w•• AS BUILT ... Dc{ 111.7 II. Yell. atm Dery & Aemaatet IL ; s ror. • , W { roc rt.� Dd_1c� S/.'/YY V. KTI _. vv f 1 llCS�s� =Crs ®s ��m�.....�..�..�mC.�..�s —M Ms ma = ~ME C�"'� M= = =MME s =MEMEME =� E. �=—®® ===i === ~�QC' .._r...�° === f�isii�:::.�... s a' ssm s sm-=�m ` .s -�� sue. m Em °� = = == ==sss == == svgs �as� ===m__ __s�m mm m= —m ss mms m.. == ., . :==_°mm =._m = = =_ i m Lim® ®m ®°mi®®Em_m.m = =MA_sa�s _s�__�s� s+: f E- Egamds marc-ama E m=.00.0 ' Wimi_ mmo_m� �s�_E_ME_ �_� EMMEE=V_1 =SE LIME NE ES m-d EMETE =E =ME aER I..E WE DEL' :: ___ ElliMIVIMPIEMEMIREEMVMEME EMOMISEENEE,_-E,_-.ELLEREZEMMEMOVIIIIIMEIMMEEM IIIIREFINMEMERAMMENSWEREMPI IEWMAIIMEETEMEZMENAMEMWEIMEMEMEIMIREINME CIRE4INEELMERM=IIMMEM �ENENZET�lEImo- _ } = memo ,iii ss � i- . .mss __ _ - - O = P 'IE ="' � NC ',I 'E ' 'EEC: MMIE li g 1 rtra: OMMI ° V� 'M" -a =- ME OL RE E� IME it N E-14 =MEND Eno.s � w m� ..�mm�.>�•��...�. . rm•r� �m...�.. A. •� �.ra�.a �... : i �—�i r�=��■m.w.=�..� A�.... � ��r.►'•..��.�� p.ai .r� �srT i=r �e.r � rm..r. m� 11.1A mo � a mi a.�c ...��.�.'.�� .o.rwr a = m ma.�m = s �a..• � ...m m� gym s w�Q . w r �.. s m.. �..� .✓ r s aim EmmE wmmammEm=r MsE- -u�m= s= = _mE==moms�� m i sm=Emmms = =m-• a-.= = . Qm =m ===m� _m�. mEmm s- -== mm Em sm m sm =. = mm=sms= _.: —M '-- -- A=w.=T m ∎.a �=____io i: —te—� == o=m= sar —= a == _s mcem ,.m. .+ ..r.w.MOM.. — %=r = m■■m■ awr ~,M2m m. mM� =.. w ∎∎. .. ∎■■= o ∎IO====.=∎11 == •••••■■w.. m E === 'yi=s �m�M E�Esi �m .m■ � iM MV == "W=0" wMmT =l1 , • . cjy7 " ' � .t/': •�.rr.. H� p1. ,�` ��Ti' �'. "_ �]F•`A�31 _ �'rAk�:Jlt7t'Ec�a�l°� _ �: +,.,�..�!1...__.�"�'ii11Ca?' ='- d[�•..• L:ii2if. cxc�ttle Audubc'n 33ocietp Washington Nonprofit Corporation 619 Joshua Green Building • Seattle, WA 98101 • 206/622 -6695 Mr. Rick Beeler Planning Director, City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 5 February 1987 FEB 0 1987 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Dear Mr. Beeler: In our letter of 12 December 1985 the Seattle Audubon Society requested that we be made a Party of Record for the proposal to extend South 168th Street across the south end of Tukwila Pond (EPIC File No. 294 -75). Because of its significance in the drainage pattern of the area and its role as a bird and wildlife feeding and resting area we stressed that we were concerned about any development which would alter the character of the Pond. We have now been made aware of a proposal under which Tukwula Pond would be filled and replaced by a shopping and office complex (EPIC File No. 350 -87). We strongly support a determination of significance for this most recent proposal. We request that we be made a Party of Record for the proposed project and further request that we be provided with a Scoping Notice on the proposal. Sincerely, ROBERT Y. GRANT, Chairman Conservation Committee King County Department of Planning and Community Development 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-7503 January 15, 1987 Mr. Rick Beeler Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Andover Park- Plaza Scoping Notice Dear Mr. Beeler: CCU :\ E 'WAN 2; 1987 CITY OF TUKVViLA PLANNING DEPT. The Department of Parks, Planning and Resources has reviewed the above scoping notice and would like transportation impacts to County facilities addressed in the EIS;. for Andover Park Plaza. A new road connecting South 180th Street to I -5 is proposed by the City of Tukwila. The connection will provide direct access to South 188th Street within King County. This roadway is already congested. The impacts of the Andover Park Plaza on South 188th Street and other County facilities given the proposed connection should be assessed and any necessary mitigation provided. Thank you for the opportunity to review this scoping notice. We look forward to reviewing the Environmental Impact Statement. Sincerely, Joe Nagel Director Designee JN:LG:lh TP:LG.3.40 cc: Donald J. LaBelle, Director, Department of Public Works ATTN: Louis J. Haff, County Road Engineer, Roads Division Bill Hoffman, Manager, Transportation Planning Section Tim Krause, SEPA Coordinator --::mETR9 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 January 15, 1987 Rick Beeler Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice File No.: EPIC - 351 -86 The Cafaro Co. Dear Mr. Beeler: ..iaN 16 19871 CITY UE TUK VILA PLANTING DEPT. Metro staff has reviewed the scoping notice and offers the following comments. While there is no apparent conflict with Metro wastewater facilities, we do have a 27 -inch diameter sewer line that runs east and west along Strander Blvd. Please refer to the attached drawings to avoid possible conflicts. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, n Jj f] Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:dwg Attachment January 14, 1987 Mr. Jack Pace City Of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Andover Park Plaza EIS Scoping Outline Dear Mr. Pace: e MMOBI [JAN 15 1J8 / CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. 0 I would like to make the following comments on the Scoping Outline sumitted by Stepan & Associates for the Andover Park Plaza. An obvious major omission to- -the - -outline- -invo-ives= wildlife. - Such -a - gross "oversight" is amazing considering that this subject should be addressed in detail in any EIS involving the site. I would further like to stress that any wildlife studies should be made for the period of one year, and involve considerable attention to migratory species. Observations during only one part of a year would present a very narrow inventory and cannot show the useage of the pond and grasslands by seasonal species. Since the project involves the entire area of the pond, I would like to suggest that the EIS include detailed descriptions for offsite mitigation. My basis for this is due to the fragile and unique habitat that will be destroyed by this development. Comments should include specific mitigation sites and proposals for such mitigation. I believe there are few, if any, sites in the area that can be modified (mitigated) or improved to replace or duplicate the existing pond site. I would further propose that the EIS identify a time schedtle for this mitiga- tion. Ideally, the offsite mitigation should be complete prior to the filling of the pond. Mr; Pace, the scoping outline' contains omissions that I would not expect from a company who!s job it is to prepare such documents and EIS's. .I certainly hope that they are more attentive in preparation of the final EIS. Sincerely, Scott Salzer • 233 S.W. 184th - Seattle, WA 98166 cc: Mr. Kent Stepan AFFID I� JOANNE JOHNSON IT [J Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board or Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [J Shoreline Management Permit OF DISTRIB,iON hereby declare that: C1 Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [j Notice of Action LJ Official Notice (� Other REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on SEE ATTACHED Name of Project ANDOVER PARK PLAZA File Number EPIC - 351 -86 CN -86 -402 necemher 24 Signature 19 86• 411 CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAILINGS ( 'v) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL AGENCIES (1l)U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( )U.S. Department of H.U.D. (Region X) WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department -) Department of Fisheries ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) Planning & Community Affairs Agency ( )Dept. of Social and Health Services ( :.)Dept. of Ecology, Shorelands Division (\,)Dept. of Ecology, SEPA Division * ( )Department of Game ( )Office of Attorney General * Send checklist with all determinations KING COUNTY AGENCIES Cy) Dept. of Planning & Community Devel. ( ) Fire District 18 ( ) Boundary Review Board ( ) Health Department ( ) South Central School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone (N,) Seattle City Light ( ,) Washington Natural Gas ( ) Water District 75 ( ) Seattle Water Department ( ) Group W Cable ( ) Kent Planning Department ( ) Tukwila Board of Adjustment ( ) Tukwila Mayor Tukwila City Departments: ( ) - Public Works ( ) - Parks and Recreation ( ) - Police ( ) - Fire ( ) - Finance ( ) - Planning /Building ( )Fire District 1 ( )Fire District 24 (NBuilding,& Land Development Division - SEPA Information Center SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( )Highline School District ( )King County Public Library ( )Seattle. Municipal Reference Library UTILITIES ( )Puget Sound Power & Light ( )Val -Vue Sewer District ( )Water District 20 ( )Water District 25 ( )Water District 125 ( )Union Pacific Railroad CITY AGENCIES ( )Renton Planning Department ( )Tukwila Planning Commission Tukwila City Council Members: ( )- Edgar Bauch ( )- Marilyn Stoknes ( )- Joe Duffie ( )- Mabel Harris ( )- Charlie Simpson ( )- Jim McKenna ( )- Wendy Morgan OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Council of Government(PSCOG) N+)METRO Environmental Planning Division (Y) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Office /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more (4) Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce Residential 50 units or more Retail 100,000 gsf or more MEDIA ( ) Daily Journal of Commerce N1) Renton Record Chronicle ( )Highline Times ( )Seattle Times - METRO Environmental Planning Div Attn:. Manager MS 92 • - 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Record Chronicle 212 Wells Avenue S. #101 Renton, WA 98055 King Co. Surface Water Mgmt. Dexter Horton Building Suite 701 710 Second Avenue Seattle, -WA - 98104 Attn Joe Miller E'CIAL RO."D'UCTS O M PANY> Scott A. Balzer IY P.O. Box '66314 Seattle; WA 98166 (206)'242 -7026 (206) -242 -0659 (503) 224 -3894 TELEX 32 -9467 Seattle Audobon Society 619 Joshua Green Building p `'O0 ik., `041 Seattle, WA 98101 Y�^i'" Attn: Bob Grant U.S. ARMY C S OF ENGINEERS ATTN: Co. Leon Moraski Seattle District NPSEN -PL -RP P.O. Box C -3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Kng Co. Dept of Planning & Community Devl. 811 Alaska Building 618 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 1015 3rd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Puget Sound Air Polution Control Agency Attn: Mr. A.R. Daumkoehler Air Pollution Control Officer P.O. Box 9863 Seattle, WA 98109 Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce 5200 Southcenter Blvd. P.O. Box 58591 Tukwila, WA 98188 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region X 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 Washington State Dept of Ecology SEPA Division MS PV -11 Abbott Raphael Olympia, WA 98504 -8711 King County Dept Building & Land "Dev. 431 King Co Administration Bldg Seattle, WA 98104 WAC 197 -11 -970 • REQUEST FOR/COMMENTS ON,SCOPE OF EIS Description of Proposal Development of_a 525,025 square feet shopping mall on 38.7 acres (Andover Park Plaza) Proponent The Cafaro Company Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Southwest corner Of Strander Blvd and Andover Park 11si- Lead Agency: City of Tukwila file No. EPIC - 351 -86 EIS Required. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion•in the EIS: Elements of the Physical Environment Requiring Emphasis: Earth, Water, Vegetation, Noise Land Use, Air, Light & Glare and Wildlife impacts of off -site mitigation. Elements of the Human Environment Requiring Emphasis: Transportations Public Services, Utilities, Aesthetics, Recreation, Pedestrian Access and Economic Impacts. Scoping. Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, pro- bable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required. The method and deadline for giving us your comments is: January 20, 1986 Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila,:WA- 98188 December 22, 1986 " ` Date Signature �` ,�,__.� Ybu.'may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be . required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Phone 433 -1845 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. PUBLISHED: Record Chronicle, December 28, 1986 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR, COMMENTS ON,SCOPE OF EIS Description of Proposal Temporary Stockpiling Permit from the City of Tukwila to place approximately 200,000 cubic yards of fill material. Proponent The Cafaro Company Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Southwest quadrant of Strander Blvd and Andover Park West Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 358 -87 E'IS Required. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: Soils, wildlife, traffic, drainage and site design. Scoping. Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, pro- bable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required. The method and deadline for giving us your comments is: January 21, 1987 Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA -;98188' Date 12/17/86 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. Stepan & Associates Engineering - Surveying - Planning 33505 13th Place South Federal Way, WA 98003 Tacoma 927 -7850 Seattle 682 -4771 December 17, 1986 Mr. Jack Pace City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Reference: Andover Park Plaza - E.I.S. Scoping Outline Dear Jack: In accordance with your request in' our meeting of yesterday, we are pleased to submit herewith our scoping outline for the draft E.I.S. on the referenced project. We understand that, upon your review and approval of the text of the scoping outline, the publication will occur this weekend. If you have any questions, please contact-me. Very truly yours, STEPAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Kent J. Stepan, P.E. President KJS /ggc cc: The Cafaro Company Stepan & Associates Draft - EIS Scoping Proposed action: Building Permit for commercial shopping mall including 525,025 s.f. of retail use on 38.9 acres, constituting a major action within the language of RCW 43.21(c).030(Q) 'Elements of the Physical Environment Requiring Emphasis: Earth: Surface and sub - surface soil conditions analysis, including construction bearing capacity, scope of grading and filling, including existing and proposed contours and elevations. Economic analysis related to sub - surface conditions. Water: Surface water retention, changes to surface water elements, including impacts on feasibility of development with on -site retention and proposed off -site mitigation and wetland replacement. Vegetation: Identification and inventory of type and extent of existing vegetation types, disclosure of proposed type and extent of replacement and landscaping plans designed to mitigate site appearance after construction. Noise: Disclosure of construction and design solutions that lend mitigation to noise levels on and off -site, and discussion of noise impacts to the site fauna with and without the proposed development. Land Use: Discussion of alternative land uses on the site as it relates to capacity of the site restrictions, soil conditions, traffic, surround- ing land uses, and direction and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and preservation or replacement of environmentally sensitive areas. Air: Disclosure of impacts on air quality as a result of this develop- ment, including impact of no- action alternative. , Light & Glare: Mitigation measures proposed as an element of the proposed development, including discussion of the degree of impact of this proposal compared to alternative development proposals. Elements of the Human Environment Requiring Emphasis: Transportation: Project analysis of the impact on the transportation sys- tem with and without development; discussion of projected and proposed improvements to the transportation system as a result of this proposed development, and schedule of projects and corridors proposed for improve- ment as a result of this proposal. Public Services: Estimate of the increase in public services required as a result of this development proposal, including cost /revenue analysis of positive revenue benefit to the. City fo Tukwila as a result of this development. Transit service enhancement or service direction and scope changes will be discussed as a portion of public service impact associat- ed with this proposal and the various alternatives to development. , Utilities: Disclosure of the adequacy of necessary utilities such as water, sewer, stormwater facilities, electricity, telephone service, natural gas, required -to serve the site, as well as any associated off -site impacts upon such systems. Aesthetics: Discussion of realistic alternatives to the proposed action - as it relates to,existing and future use of the site as private proper- ty as opposed to public use and enjoyment. Mitigation of perceived loss of benefit due to alteration of the area of standing water on the site, and proposed mitigation and alternative off -site mitigation to replace public loss and enjoyment. Overall discussion of the result of the proposed development as it relates to the coordination of mitigating measures of landscaping, noise, light and glare mitigation measures, off -site improvements and wildlife preservation project contribution, and public use and recreation enhancement as a result of the proposed development and the range of alternatives discussed. Recreation: Discussion of potential enhancement of the opportunity for public enjoyment and use of the site for recreational purposes compared to the no- action alternative or the range of other development possibili- ties that could occur on this site. Mitigation measures pursued for off - site wildlife enhancement programs that have an effect on the recreation- al opportunities as a result of this proposed development will be compar- ed to the impact upon these programs if the no- action alternative is taken. Pedestrian Access: Discussion of the possibility of enhancement of access to and within the site for each alternative, including benefit to the overall pedestrian use of this site and adjacent sites as an alterna- tive to motorized trnasportation requirements to achieve mobility within the commercial core of the City of Tukwila. Discussion of the treatment of pedestrian amenities and opportunity as a realistic alternative to mandated reliance on motorized transportation for internal ciruclation. November 14, 1986 410 allimmi Stepa LEf _n_ &Associ t so v; 4 19861 Engineering - Surve ing - Pianning- - . j 33505 13th Place Sou CsTY ()r Tlii . "�s'�A Federal Way, WA 9800 PLANNING DEPT. Tacoma 927 -7850 Seattle 682 -4771 Mr. Jack Pace Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 11 Reference: Andover Park Plaza - Stockpile Permit Dear Jack: mentioned in our various conversations the last few weeks, we are transmitting herewith six (6) copies of the stockpile plan and Environ- mental Checklist for your review and approval. Our specific request is to obtain City approval to stockpile approximately 200,000 cubic yards of fill material on the north 350' of the subject property. The material to be stockpiled will come from a mass grading project located in South Puyallup. The material will largely be gravelly loam. The distance of the travel is approximately 12 miles. The route will be northerly along SR 167, west on S.W. 43rd Street - S. 180th Street, and north on Andover Park West. We estimate that there will be approximately 25 truck trips per day. All trucks will enter from Andover Park West and haul during off -peak hours. Maintenance of streets (clean -up) will be provided on a daily basis by the applicant. The length of time included to complete the work will be approximatley 3 months. The work will com- ply with all City codes. As shown on the enclosed plan, all stockpiled materials will be on portions of the site that have been previously filled. If the proposed mall development project is not approved by the City, the stockpiled materials will be removed by the applicant and the site restored to its natural condition. The applicant is The Cafaro Company. We hope that the enclosed provides the information you need. Please contact us if you have any questions. Very truly yours, STEPAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Kent J. Stepan, P.E. President KJS /ggc Enclosures CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER S +S'1 CONTROL NUMBER 24-402., CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - R rING FORM TO: Q BLDG. Q PLNG. Q P.W. 7[ FIRE Q POLICE Q P. & R. PROJECT JQhdaJGv- iw� e43a ADDRESS 14l a f2L DATE TRANSMITTED )1/115,( RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Aft 43t C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 3116k. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: utntANe.,1r 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED Q PLAN APPROVED L PLAN CHECK DATE 1:( /,/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 ITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER .A"$, CONTROL NUMBER $4-402. CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - RGTING FORM TO: 0 BLDG. [[ PLNG. P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE ❑ P. & R. PROJECT Aheloav" �iw1L (I �A3a. ADDRESS gncl. DATE TRANSMITTED 4i/14;44 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY ))))9Alt C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 341,G. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN II S NNOT�E D : 4 El 4t VS-49 iIrrt-}.0 sT - r-14-V., 6LL, Q 'n -1-4A cif 1x) Fug tae 4-cN F-iNk6s N.P O Rov. ` ,tc P nia4 PM aid. , (� OTU C.111I c-s 1 -rocvo rI,J,r)vo uP RL [[ c 1_d, L C °S r& 1L {S is ri 11t 1 Dl * T ` T>iN QL_ %11 • sr,1 LINK -nt e Dwuzotk ❑ Z q, 11-ct s i e.r: i s td-LLD 1..o futit.to . � N Pri,rrioPmp a � D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 ITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER EPIC 350 -87 CONTROL NUMBER 86 -402 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ACING FORM TO: [► BLDG. ( PLNG. (7ZI P.W. PROJECT Andover Park Plaza [l FIRE Et POLICE 2( P. & R. ADDRESS Tukwila .Pond DATE TRANSMITTED 11/14/86 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11/19/86 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED. a a 0 0 a / 7 a a a a 0 0 0 a a 0 i ,j D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [XI PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0 PLAN APPROVED [[ PLAN CHECK DATE %y / 7.‘ COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER EPIC 350 -87. CONTROL NUMBER 86 -402 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - IETING FORM III TO: [f BLDG. El PLNG. [i P.W. FIRE C1 POLICE [' P. & R. PROJECT Andover Park Plaza ADDRESS Tukwila Pond DATE TRANSMITTED 11/14/86 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11/19/86 RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELIW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONC RN IS NOTED: • _der .411...em1..&_ D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN CHECK DATE 1( PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED J COMMENTS PREPARED BY PLAN APPROVED [[ C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER E64.4. SAP'S/ CONTROL NUMBER S4-4O2. CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROIONG FORM . TO: [[ BLDG. Q PLNG. (] P.W. ❑ FIRE . POLICE C1 P. & R. PROJECT ,Ar,401JGe' 643c ADDRESS itAiAdet 1L DATE TRANSMITTED ))//4-101 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY )09,43L C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 30,6k. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ POLICE DEPARTMENT CONCERNS: ❑ 1. WHILE ADDRESSED IN BOTH THE COVER LETTER AND TCHHENCKLIST, IT MUST BE ❑ EMPHASIZED, THE IMPACT OF ADDITIONAL/TRRFFICCOI�ORUSH HOUR TRAFFIC ❑ PRESENTLY CREATING A L -0 -S OF D OR E IN THE VICINITY OF S 180 ST ❑ AND SR 181 WOULD BE HORRENDOUS. ❑ 2. SPILLAGE AND DEBRIS FROM TRUCKS RUNNING THROUGH THE CITY. ❑ 3. LOCATION OF ACCESS POINT TO SITE AND ITS IMPACT ON INTERSECTION OF STRANDER AND ANDOVER W. 0 ❑ 11/17/86 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 pi 1 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ PLAN APPROVED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE . COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ATING FORM TO: [✓ BLDG. PLNG. PROJECT Andover Park Plaza ADDRESS Tukwila Pond DATE TRANSMITTED 1.1/14/86. PERMIT NUMBER EPIC 350 -87 1 P.W. CONTROL NUMBER 86 -402 FIRE POLICE P. & R. 4.1./ � � Q' NOV 1 7198e rJ , PUPLIC RKS RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11/19/86 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ El 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fLo?)() f P t4, 1\A (T s 11.1 "Fm l_ P -1),Y \1 6U,CT(W s t). c. u) S- rAt\'b1 w r4- n '4tu i1■ve • o) s 1 9 c�G� u LIMY P - -Po—II 4 r Yr( 1m Pn-c — ; s (1 i3s fJ C( c•.� i �� oci__u 11 Si Gl D-Ock (i3 t\/ r) -Pi LL 4(-S ( ( -N\c' )T P 1 Nr) - e- c==or ij ,-) 1:67)k- p ci--K . i A PPM °mss , "GIs sal p YY1 ANT Lc-r-1 Fuk "F-1 LL LTS 2 v R-c- fl Trtii j .(S PcC c_._0 w W c 1 iDeh d? A P1 J E-oPr F1$ Gv ro9 rte f iy Q f PPb) v ! 1 F 6 S T s c/N)- • ?A --r),. D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED Di PLAN CHECK DATE 1 / g PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ COMMENTS PREPARED BY PLAN APPROVED 0 C.P.S. FORM 2 "` CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER EPIC 350 -87 CONTROL NUMBER 86 -402 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - •ING FORM 411 TO: [✓i BLDG. El PLNG. [ P.W. [7' FIRE [1j POLICE 2r P. & R. PROJECT Andover Park Plaza ADDRESS Tukwila Pond DATE TRANSMITTED 11/14/86 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Jack Pace RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11/19/86 RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: a cyde/I 0457 i, 1115 ? rfr 1- t\t- u$:#15 pi.11 -k -10 los-s-c_ .4-‘ el411i. -Au' iftr-u Cf pi ,40L5 ,o, • ,no_s- ? Q ,i,ve o - 00- ilar\) A i 0 -iii‘"2 -s Q wi 4 lb. < J Q .... O - ? emLA0.4 s,,,,,..444- ,_ etc.L. --14 o , A El — t (,-. 436 .5 El pqt/A- ou 6j-tie <6, A-h4,1-tA0 4,1■■ Q Q Q Q Q D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN CHECK DATE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED J COMMENTS PREPARED BY _)10)44C/ PLAN APPROVED 0 C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER . CONTROL NUMBER Se - 4G2 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - STING FORM TO: 12 BLDG. C1 PLNG. ❑ P.W. (] FIRE Q POLICE ❑ P. & R. PROJECT A64006v' o?„, L�ta3c. ADDRESS 7ol41k gAcl. DATE TRANSMITTED 4/14-/1544 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY )))) ie3C C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Sabi. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ene4g�/- away 7 5�ioul� -►►'I we l ao'e a de$1. n4 ❑ J om(, t, 7 v 0 -P. Cal a+ Q / e -, i`5- 4,141. vi f t‘ecf 1-0 d yy 14,16d44/5- ? ❑ E 146 •/; �i iI U14Kilarial kikoovyt aplayocited by at so,'is elr ey cts ❑ bi 5dt tit, hk 7D'r 5-}ruc. uf7:4 ( /31/ ,Xek,( +oY clkiuyt proo'QG'i . ❑ /� �5hou(c n4 bQ TI /1/11e?. I� ,: r 011 nou) Icsn I i( ea-i Q Yee 9/ -1-14/2_7,,e. ; t e project «L4)e') do .2.517' t -f21!/ 0 ❑ 0 0 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ PLAN APPROVED ❑ PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 [t OV 14 1986 CITY OF TUi.VViLA ttleMUNBEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Contr4116. ?36 .'t Epic File No. a56 8'I Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 44'114 OaO 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Andover Park Plaza 2. Name of applicant: The Cafaro Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:c /o Kent J. Stepan, (682 -4771) 33505 13th Place S., Suite B, Federal Way, WA 98003 4. Date checklist prepared: October 16, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The project will be completed within six months from the permit issuance date. have. =-any pl=ans =- -for future.;: add •tions:, -•.-; expans.ion or_ further- activity related to'or= connected wi_th..this proposal ?« If=yes, explain. .Tes.- -the ap p licant is .currently - conducting property=-Survey,- soil tests and 1 :1 • 1 •• maater p-1an for- a-- major- commercial /retail facitity=-to he known-as Andover Park Plaza. - 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. As a part of the impending Andover Park Plaza development application, an Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Chapter 42.21C RCW. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. As mentioned above. the development application for a maior commercial/ retail facility on the subject site will be submitted to.the City in the near future. • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. A City's stockpiling permit is needed for this proposal. However, for the ultimate development of Andover Park Plaza the following approvals or permits w>J_5e__:__ - necessary: a. Development Site Plan Approval; b. Building_Permits; and- c. 'Grading & Drainage Approval _ — 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. the applicant in anticipation of the ultimate development of Andover Park Plaza, is seeking a Temporary Stockpiling Permit from the City to place approximate 200.000 cubic yards of fill material on the north 350' of the subject property - iust far enough away from the existing wetland and its associated fringe area. Locat,-ion,of the_ proposal -„, Give-sufficient information,for a.personJo understand -.precise location -of _your:-- proposed:pr..oject, including- a- street __address, if _, _. _._ _ _ _• any .and _sect:i on, :township, and : range, if known;:. Af =:a- p_rop:asal :would occur over == `= a = r..ange_of -_ area provide -the_: ranger:or:boundaries=of. the = site( s). -= Provide a legal s i t e __.vici pity. - map,.- and- topographic_: map, if reasonably 'available.;�- While you: _shou,ld:.;submi,t_;any.:plans ,required_by the agency, you are not _required -toduplicate- maps__ or: = detailed .plans. submitted- with: any: permit applica- -t i ons- related -to -this_ checklist. The site. approximately 40 acres in size, is located in the southwest quadrant of Strander Blvd. and Andover Park West, and is in the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 26, Townshiu 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Tukwila. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, the site is designated "Special Development Considerations" area on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map which stipulates that any urban development proposed for the area must respond sensitively to certain environmental factors. -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPL.NT • B. ENVIRONMENTAL. ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. ;General description of the site (circle.one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other water body and wetland b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 25% along the west. boundary c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The entire site is classified Urban Land (Ur) per King County Soil Survey, 1973, which indicates that the land has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material from about 3 to more than 12 feet in thickness. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, based on a recent site reconnaissance, there is no visible evidence indicating any unstable soils on or in the immediate vicinity of the property. . Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The estimated 200,000 cubic yards fill material will come from a commercial project located in the southwest quadrant of SR 512 and SR 161 in South Hill Puyallup. The material will largely be gravelly loam. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion could occur under severe rainstorm during operation. However, installation of desiltation ponds and filter fence at stormwater discharging points and the limiting of operation to dry months will reduce the impact of erosion to a minimum. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for - example, asphalt or buildings)? No impervious surfaces are proposed with this proposal. However the ultimate development of the site will have approximately 75% of the area covered with imper- vious surfaces. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 1 ..Install temporary detention and filtering facilities per City standards. 2.Landscape or hydroseed all disturbed areas as soon as operation is complete. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Temporary adverse impacts on suspended particulate levels could occur in the site vicinity due to soil disturbance (dust) and hearty equipment exhaust emissions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may _affect -your. proposal ? - If so;:. generally d.escr be.:: ido. -: not.,to :the :best :.of__our knowledge. • Proposed measures__to= reduce- or- controLemissions or other -- impacts to air ;.::if., any: The :Contractors shall comply with PSAPCA's operation techniques during operation. which consist of watering open areas during dry weather and clearing public roads of mud and dust deposited by construction vehicles. 3. Water a. Surface:. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, -saltwater; lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. there is a stormwater detention pond approximately 15 acres. lying in the southwest portion of the site. Evaluation for Agency Use Only S• Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available. plans. No work over or in the described water body is being proposed with this- project. However, the ultimate-development might call for some modification or relocation of the existing detention pond. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. The ultimate development . of the property might require 150 _000 to 200,000 cubic yards of fill material to be placed in the existing pond and the fringe wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. The current proposal does not require any surface water withdrawals or diversions. 5) Does `the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The existing pond has an outlet elevation of 15.4'; the subject proposal is on an area north of the pond and has an average elevation of 19'. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. other than discharge stormwater at present rates, no waste materials will be generated by the subject proposal. b. Ground: c. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. T - Nn 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A Water Runoff (including storm water): 1.) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater will be collected along the base of the proposed stockpiles via channelized ditches into the proposed detention /siltation and filtering facilities before discharging into the existing pond. -7 Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials other than stormwater will be- generated by the subject_ proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: aettention /siltation and filtering £a,cilitjgs will he installed per City standards. which will reduce the runoff water impacts to a minimum. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduous tree: x evergreen tree: ir cedar, pine, other x shrubs x- grass _ pasture crop or grain x wet soil plants: c�.attail�'6uttercup.„) lrushi) skunk cabbage, other, water, parsley, berries water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Other than grass and some seedling size aspen and native brush, nono maior LE R.2.5 Or wetland plants wi l l be _affecLed with the subi -c_t_toposal . However, the ultimatdevelQpment might call for the removal of_most of the existing vegetation. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to the best of our knowledge. Agency Use Only other willow • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Only hydroseeding of disturbed area is being proposed with the subject proposal. However, the ultimate development will require extensive land- scaping and re- vegetation on the entire site, especially around the detention pond. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or -near. the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ducks, geese, sparrow, robins, etc. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: frog -- :fish.. = _bassi- salmom trout °;. herring, shellfish, other: minnow - ::1- istr :any_:thr-eatened__or= .endangered -species known to be'- on-- or'=near the site. -:None-to to the best° -of-our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or .enhance wildlife, . if any: The subiect proposal will have little, if . any impact on wildlife. However, the ultimate development will significantly alter the existing wildlife habitat. The extent of which will be thoroughly addressed in the impending Environmental Impact Statement. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, -- manufacturing, etc. Only fossil fueld will be used to run construction vehicles b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A c. What kinds of energy. conservation features are " :rincluded- :in_- the -plans- of._this=proposal? ... List other - °- :. proposed.= measures- ::to :..reduce :or.. control energy ° "� impacts, if any: - N/A 7.- Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Equivalent noise levels associated with site work in progress for approximately a 6 -month period would range from 70 dBA to 90 dBA. 3) Proposed-measures' to reduoe or control noise -__ impacts, if any: -1•; -- Limits site-work to daytime hours. %___._- _.: -_ 2. Equip all' heavy: construction vehicles with effective- muffler systems and engine covers wherever possible. . Land and = Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent :r properties? North - Southcenter Shopping Mall; East.- vacant land: South & West - retail professional office. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -P. Planned Business Center f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ,Commercial w /Special Development_Consi= derations g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? .N /A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The property has never been officially designated as "environmentally sensitive ".area , though has always-been- treated as such. - = .i.`n.:Apprax.:imate�y:how -many= people Would reside or work -in =the complend project ? - -The- subject= proposal could provide 30 full-time-jobs for 3 -6 months: the - ultimate- development-could provide 300 full &- par-t- time permanent jobs. Approximately - how- = many= people= would --the----completed project project displace? None - k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will comply with all City codes and plans. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Nnn P c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The highest point on the proposed stockpiles will he 19' above existing ground - approximately.15' above Strander Blvd. and 16 feet above Andover Parkway. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? .JNIo scenic-views in the immediate area will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: All exposed soil and disturbed areas will be land- scaped or hydroseeded immediately after operation 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a.. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None . d.= :Proposed - measures -. to- - reduce or..:-control 11 ight and -- _- -glare._impacts, if any: N/A . 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A . Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A • III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or'pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? I.f so, generally describe. Not to the best of our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts; if any: N/A —=14..- Transportation a. Identify - public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Hauling route from the borrow site to the subject site will be via SR 512, SR 167,'S14' 43rd St. and Andover Parkway. Only one entry /exit point off Andover Parkway is proposed with this proposal. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A -.Not relevant at this juncture of the project. c: How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A - Not relevant at this juncture of the project. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads or improvements to existing streets are required with this proposal. However,_ .thc- uleimate development will inevitably require additional roads and improve- ments. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is anticipated that 10 to 25 trucks will be en _a ed_in -the operation. usin _ ___ _ 4 trips per-truck . =per day;:..it -is reasonable to assume that_40:to 100-trips-per day will be generated by this proposal. g•:°.• -Proposedi _measures �- to - reduce on-control transpor- ?. -,tation- impacts, if any: Avoid rush hour runs. 2: Avoid using.Strander Blvd. for access to the site. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for . public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N/A - Not at this juncture of the _proiect. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic- system, other. N/A - Not at this juncture of the project. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or . in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A C. Signature =The_: above answers are -true and_ complete - to the best of knowledge: =_ I- .:understand. = == that:_.- the-; -lead -agency is -- ,- _rely_in.g_ on- :them. toy make= its decision. Signature:; Evaluation for Agency Use Only ___ Date- ..Submitted: October -- 1986 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIAT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the _ proposed action in the context of the environmental infor -=-- — mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? In anticipa- tion of the eventual development of 'the subiect property, the Applicant Cafaro Company. is seeking a temporary Stockpiling Permit from the City to place approximately 200.000 cubc yards of fill materials on the north 350' of the property. Meanwhile. the Applicant is conducting jzround survey. soil tests and engineering studies on the entire site in preparation for the development of a master plan for a major commercial /retail facility to be known as 'Andover Park Plaza'. :_ -- -�- - 2.- What:-are the= al ternative - means: of accomplishing these _. objectives? The estimated 200.000-cubic yards of fill - - material currently - available to the Applicant is located ' - _ ir} South hill, Puyallup. Since this fill material is surplus from an on -going commercial development. it is mutually beneficial to both projects. However. if the subject property is not ready within a short time to receive this material, then the Applicant would have no alternative but to forego this bard -to- come -by opportunity with. regret-. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Obviously. the. Applicant would vehemently prefer the proposed course of action since alternative means are virtually non - existing. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? We believe the subiect proposal does not conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan policies since the proposed stockpiling area is located outside of the existing pond and its associated wetland areas. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Adhere to all mitigating measures outlined in the checklist and snake sure. during operation. that all equint and vehicles stay clear out of wetland and its fringe Habitats. -23- TEMPORARY : GRAVEL CONSTRUCT /ON ENTRANCE , EN1;ON': 9ri.AMrkT .act• kJ • �MAI +(rATER LEVEL. VICINITY MAP CONSTRUCTION. SEQUENCE 1.' CLEAR AND GRUB:TO CLEARING LIMITS PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO SEDIMEN- TATION PONDS. USE FILTER FENCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY NATIVE-VEGETATION • AROUND THE PERIMETER-OF THE PROJECT: 2..' CONSTRUCT AS REQUIRED - -A- SEDIMENTATION POND. INCLUDIN$ OUTLET STRUCTURES • -TO INSURE THAT SILT FREE WATER LEAVE THE SITE. - 3.. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO SEOIMENTATION -PONDS THROUGH ANY OF THE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. - 4: USE "ABSORBANT" "AND PROPER DISPOSAL PRACTICES FOR ANY FUEL OR OIL LEAKS FROM EQUIPMENT WRING CONSTRUCTION.• 5. MAINTAIN AND' CLEAN. SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, AS INDICATED BY ANY. BUILD -UPS. THOROUGHLY 'CLEAN THE STORM-SYSTEN AT THE EAOSIOUSEDIICKTATIOe. IOTLS.. oeC tamest. "CITY OF TUKWILA WA H DEPT. OF' PUBLIC WORKS'. • 1. All IL11. of <leannq.aed arnt at vegetation prnenatlan as described onsne plan • atoll M clearly flagged-la 01. •24.ld w- Obs.nes bring construction. . • .2. All rewired Mieentatio. /erosion•control facll Ittm mast be-crostructeO.and in : . opera... prior to l.r4 l snag and/or other- c0nstru<tim to insure teat sediment lean - - r. does.,not enter we natural Oro /.pe'systea. All erose0p and sediment facilities - shall be maintained-in a satlsfaetory condition untll'14c0.tfm that altering' a2/or. constrlction..is co.pl.tel•and entente.; for Mslte .ro.10u Ms passed. The impplc...-• tation, maintenance; replace0ent wet addictions to eros10011MIwMtlmi control systas - 'shall'be.tb. ntpestbtllty of um committee.. .. - .: .. - - • O. 'led- erosion and dlii u iitatton control: systens depleted on 101.- drwing.ar* Intended-t* -00 • niar remireents ID...t- antittwted Wu wnd1t10ns. A."anestrwtion progrSM1 .0 : .pected or. seasonal conditions mctete :.the peretttm stipule anticipate tat dove a and sedimentation control /ecl0ltlec will be necessary .to insure coglete silt. .11nn control n .th. pnpased site. During Ur. course of crostratti0n, It -theirbe the . . obligation and responsibility of the pn.ittee 10.:.Wares, any nee conditions that may be • by-his activities and es provide edO /boner :.r.ctlltln. over and .have .Ielrne created sir ®nts. avow be needed to protect •431001t ,pl0pertlea uW ..the mel1ty, er.1M.. :'� 4.• Aror.l -o th m l. ola0 Is for arinn /sedlmntation'c0ntrol only w f : at does mat constitute en .nerovel- of stow dr.a0.ge Oa11oo.•s/yi nor, lunation of pipes. r.strittbes. channels' :5.- Any disturbed aVea.o.onich Ms• been etr1pp.0 / vegetation and ilen' o further vpeh / anticipated for period-0f TO mays M sore mstha.lme41at011 stabilized with mlching ' • . - 9reas.plantln9 or other approved erot10-"wntrol treatment applicable e -u the time of year• • ..In 9.mt100. Grass seeding a1ones0111 W .Uepta01. only bring the oaths Of'.Aprt1 thro 30ptnnber, 1ec1os1...-3eed1.9 -..? •WOCecd outside the specified tine period iieMeer.lt Is.. le the interest ef•tbe perelttee:: but' w.t.M eup0nted with winging. nettle% W ether • treatment_ approved N t . Department. : •6.: All erotica/sedimentation control mods' .1th • deed'ater.90 depth winding 6- Inches most M s w 0•Tam IOUs • maim. Might of 3 font. - i.- MNgtD�l0. POV 141986 CITY OF TUi.V :o.A I PLANNING 0265. 'let'AVCA. ratrei4ae - reCCOCO 9.f; O f . •aOCO noes -Acme ' d -R<TER /uLA'IC jie 1n // OR fOa/AL ptrrago don 16/01, 'NEWLY OAA020 tee/ rO C SW! SAaf' • euwr eurro.0 TEAVAL /N II_1 1 -/ / = O'TRCNCN. .7YP /CAL 'CROSS SECTION WATER ELEV. - 19.0. FILTER FABRIC FENCE • - PERFORATED PIPE: OVERFLOW ELEV.- 18,1 FILTER FABRIC ,9001D 'F hp.- FILTER,. ' FABRIC FENCE'. `_ _ .GRAVEL BERM' / /E.lOot -