The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-352-86 - KATO ET AL - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REZONEKATO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & REZONES 15419 62ND AVE. S0. EPIC 352 -86 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal 86 -65 -CPA: Comprehensive Plan Amendment from High Density Residential to Office and 86 -66 -R: Rezone from R -4 (Low Apartments) to P -0 Prof- essional and Office). Site consists of two parcels with a total area of (0.52 +0.98 = 1.50.':. acres Proponent Michio and Hisako Kato /Tom and Katie Kato Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 15419 62nd Avenue S. and the lot immediately west of the parcel with this address in the SW 1/4 of Sec. 23, twn 23, Rng 4. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-352-86. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with ,the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [t There is no comment period for this_DNS Li This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwil Date )P4Cj -24 j (`[$? Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Phone 433 -1845 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS • • MEMORANDUM P;..,<:2's% „ar DEPT. TO: Rick Beeler, SEPA Responsible Official From: Cris Crumbaugh Date: January 14, 1987 RE: Comprehensive Plan and Rezone Application by M/M T. Kato and M/M M. Kato. Please amend the subject applications to reflect the following change: A twenty -two foot private road access easement will be located across Parcel A to Parcel B from 62nd Avenue South. This easement will be located on a map in a manner and location acceptable to the City of Tukwila prior to final action by the City of the Tukwila on the above - referenced applications. It is my understanding that the City of Tukwila will provide the applicants with a document assuring them that the subject easement location is viewed as an initial designation and may be revised upon approval of the City of Tukwila. Please contact me immed .ately if this is not the case. By: Cris F. Crumbaugh CITY OF TUKWILA CONTROL NUMBER &a- 4; u CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTINGlItRM 4 TO: ❑ BLDG. J PLNG. [( P.W. 0 FIRE ( POLICE 0 P. & R. PROJECT 7c7 come, PLC _AMAX+EN M c'7LiY d- R o'f ADDRESS ) S-4- /? 2.-IP AVe So, DATE TRANSMITTED / oZ. // S (gc., RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /a ,/ i /& C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ AREAS OF CONCERN TO POLICE DEPARTMENT: ❑ 1. ACCESS POINTS TO PROJECT: a. FROM SOUTHCENTER BLVD...THIS COULD ONLY BE ARIGHT IN...RIGHT 0 OUT ACCESS WITH ITS ATTENDANT PRORI FMS. TN IHE AREA O-F - F0-R,- CEMENT. b. FROM 62 AVE S. .THE PRESENT ACCESS POINTS TO 6000 &6100 S/C . 0 BLVD HAVE CREATED PROBLFMS Al ON( THIS STRETCH OF STREET TO ADD ANOTHER ACCESS POINT LOCATED BETWEEN THESE BUILDINGS AND 0 THE ENTRANCES TO SUNWOOD AND COTTArF CRFEIC WILL ONLY FURTHER COMPUND THE PROBLEM. ❑ 2. THE ADDITION OF MORE OFFICE SPACF Witt nNCF A(ATN BROADEN THE BASE OF CALLS FOR SERVICE AND MAY NECESSITATE A RECONFIGURATION 0 OF PATROL. ASSIGNMENTS AND RESPONSE TiMF_ 3. THE CRIME PREVENTION PRACTIONEER SHOULD BE CONSULTED BY THE DEVELOPER ❑ TO PROVIDE THE MOST UP TO DATE INFORMATION nN cFCURITY DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STRUCTURES. ❑ ❑ 12/23/86 PJL - ❑ D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [l PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ PLAN APPROVED [[ PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA . • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTIN FORM f�cM CONTROL NUMBER u L - 41 TO: [] BLDG. [] PLNG. Q P.W. [[ FIRE (J POLICE )! P. & R. PROJECT i:/.44-719 (2614.e _P1- AML) &W M CPT- O/t ADDRESS )51f 4 i? AV L1 S o DATE TRANSMITTED I a. // S ('C RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /a 43/86 • C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE. ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIAT: COI' R.I (- SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO HE L I,N_E;(S� 4 (y�W%}'(��JJ7jj''�Tj ��i ll iJ �J�JVV THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: O 0 0 D O 0 0 D D CITY OF 1 ui:vvILA D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED C1 PLAN CHECK DATE 41- 02 a/ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED COMMENTS PREPARED BY PLAN APPROVED 0 C.P.S. FORM 2 1 CITY OF TUKWILA % CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM — ROUTI FORM TO: CONTROL NUMBER '( — U BLDG. Q PLNG. Q P.W. Q FIRE Q POLICE Q P. & R. PROJECT KATO COme POD 4/-M traZ M 7'T d— ADDRESS ) 54- /' .1 A Ile S O DATE TRANSMITTED 102./// 8' ('C RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /c . 42/6) C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Q 3, I , — Grail or [;11 r er& 't 0-7,3 Ow ld ref/14'14.e- pe. i- i u �Y 0 p vo u tors cv . c `7O0, vac, . p - /Q9' y .to <�'o�!'o�? wor 0 d- e 1(r 5-1 5-01y Y•ei 0 ygu ati,Q a -. a 0 Q 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [[ PLAN CHECK DATE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [[ COMMENTS PREPARED BY PLAN APPROVED [[ C.P.S. FORM 2 h � L CITY OF TUKWILA r CONTROL NUMBER S - / ? CENTRAL. PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTI FORM TO: [( BLDG. Q PLNG. P.W. E] FIRE [I POLICE E] P. & R. PROJECT KA-7 7 C .P PLC As- M &T d- R.6 -0AZ& ADDRESS ) ( 1 4V( So. DATE TRANSMITTED i a2./ v - RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /a. 43 /8 C.P.S. STAFF COORDIN RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTA ND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: 'T. f rn ■• T e c)F -V( .01 t.11 Q _ iZ r A0 0 -0 /7)4 12k7 Y To '77i1C Paotodlii p T}-1 E 71 o urn /REC D Q .(V1 116-711 C•y\Ao o") Mt 711 P(.10/16:kiLA Q -CIA f O 1 Lv- DI: l Y ' Mt 1 , mt %a k PUBLIC WORKS Q 661 U T-(7111-) C u. \ [\k-T LJ Q it-t-t. M flt s ,nuts Vt4 /IN P &jr1� Q Ati tg-‘t) vtDisrCl YY :Wsc - > /I vas. o� Q ""cm.rr -tict\,T f��v p . < < / i1 a D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED [[ PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [J PLAN APPROVED [[ PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 A"r"./J4, OF TUKWILA CONTROL NUMBER &,--4,/ ? CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUT* FORM 410 TO: [[ BLDG. PLNG. Q P.W. [] FIRE [j POLICE C1 P. & R. PROJECT KA-7e, Ca- 8 P6- M Rib M & Y d- ADDRESS )S---1- 1? r 2= A V e So, DATE TRANSMITTED /al/ g (gC, RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /02 43/8 /8 RESPONSE RECEIVED C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:- ❑ ❑ 1//R 7. 14- 1 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED EI PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED [� PLAN APPROVED [j PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 Conte No. S6 - 3 Epic File No. 35L-8 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Kato Rezone (R -4 to P -0) 2. Name of applicant: Michio U Hisako Kato and Tom & Katie Kato 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Mr. and,Mrs. Michio Kato, 9316 -39th South, Seattle.,t WA 98118' - 4: :- : = Tomato 15419 62nd S. — Tukwila, WA (243 -0738) Cris Crumbaugh 151!5 52nd S.) Tukwila (241 -7734) 4. Date checklist prepared: December 11, 1986 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Rezone from R -4 to P : -4 in -early 1987. Develop office huilcling subsequent to rezone approval. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Develop office building after re7anP approval_ 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental checklists prepared for North Hill Associates on.4 /3 /84, and Sunwood Phase III. These properties are immediately west and north of the subject property respectively. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Building permit and /or BAR applications pending with the Nnrth Hill and Windmark (Sunwood III) properties. -2- NM BM DEC i 219861 CITY Uf- TU VJiL A PLANNING DEPT. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. . 11 • - . - . at _rezone, building permit, curb ruh /arrPss permit, water hook -up permit, sewer book -up permit, stormwater system permit, King Co. Hydraulics permit, King Co plumbing permit, state el.ectr. i:cal , sign permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Rezone iw parcels ofproperty fron R -4 to P D_to low for tWa_prniessional offic.e ildings of approximi1e 7 ,200 square feet n the westernmost property and 11,800 square feet on the easternmost The height aLthe potential office buildings is expected to be two stories or approximately 24 feet in height_ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or . detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The properties front on either the north side of Southc.e_nter BouIe rd or__ the west side of 62nd Ave. S. One property is addressedas 15419 62nd Aye_ .South Raw- Legal descriptions. site nlan, vicinity map and topographies map are a ttaches) as party lbe rezone application -. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? 1�0 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICI B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other hillside with 15 -18% average grade b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 23% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravel with small amounts of clay and sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. no Evaluation for Agency Use Only e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. To create more level building sites and parking areas, the site will be cut and filled in such a manner as to minimize the grading necessary for project construction. Source of fill is on site material. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some soil disruption will occur during construction but temporary erosion controls shall be used per requirements of the City Engineer. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 50% building areas 30% asphalt areas • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,.if any: Temporary Prnsinn cnntrnl per requirements of City FnginPPr 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Relatively small amounts of dust during construction and automobile exhaust with building occupancy. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Automobile exhaustsfrom high travel corridor along I -405 and Southcenter Boulevard c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust control during construction per requirements of City Engineer 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No II) 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No 1 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Surface water runoff shall be controlled via an on -site retention system and connected to the City s storm drainage system per requirements of tie City Engineer. • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Nn d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Provide on- site_drainage system_and_storm Sewer hookups per requirements of City_ _Li nePr_ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass, shrubs, and some small trees_ alnna.pPrimetPr of the site c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposed office development and corresponding landscape will beneficially increase thequantity and quality of plan species,. 5. Animals a. Circle. any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. F1Pctric and natural gas is PXpertPd' to be Diced foE_Lighting and heatinpffice_huildings b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? - If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not'. :known at this time. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police, fire, and medical emergency services could be used from time to time by future occupants'of the office buildings. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: none Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your. project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from Southcent r .Boulevard and I -405 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation,. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction related noise will occur during construction hours allowed by the City. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Abide by construction hours allowed by the City. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant and single family residential on subject site, office building and Southcenter Boulevard to south, vacant /proposed office to the west, vacant /proposed multi - family to north, and multi - family and 62nd Ave. S. to east. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. not known c. Describe any structures on the site. a single family residence Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not as a- result of the zooming change but the single family residence would be removed before development of office building would occur. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R -4 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? High density residential g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? not applicable - h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not known at this time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Two people in single family residence. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. Owner - occupants-would relocate themselves. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and, plans, if any: Building height would be limited to reduce view obstruction,and BAR requirements would be met. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? Not applicable b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. One c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? It is not known at this time but expected to be two story or 24' high office buildings. P -0 zoning would limit height of buildings to 35 feet or 3 stories. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? View analysis of the hillside topography and proposed building heights and finished floor grade of proposed multi - family units finds little view obstruction.- Analysis attached. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Meet. BAR requirements. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Some off -site lighting spillover may occur at night when car headlights are not screened by the contours of the site or from parking lot lighting. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not expected to be a problem because of topography. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may, affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Meet BAR requirements. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? _ Tukwila Park, City Hall picnic table area, proposed S -line bridge hillside /sidewalk pocket park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 4 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Nn b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. done c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Southcenter Boulevard to the south and 62nd Ave. S. to the east. Proposed access is to 62nd Ave. S. Site plan attached. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? _ Bus stop at 62nd Ave. S. and Southcenter Boulevard is ; mile from site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 50-and none. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 360 ADT is estimated for 20,000 square feet of tota_1 office space. The peak volume would occur at 5:00 p m g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The office development would require basic public safety services and utilities hut would not warrant an increase in City service levels nr staff_ b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. y av able ani -wer, is - • er. • , Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or_in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. On -site private lines and hook ups C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: • 12-i temp PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC# III Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Minimally nr not all Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: On -site retention drainage system 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Substitute maintained landsraping for sparse vegetation Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: None • Ill . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Increase development and use of building materials and energy resources for utility purposes. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Nn impact Proposed measures . to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? with Surrounding land utec and pravidP a buffer from the high travel corridor impacts ta_uphill rpcidencpc_ - . - - • • II - 1 II 1 - . 1 . . IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Building offices How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Nnt located in shnrelinP area 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? 360 Average daily trips will be generated by office users. Normal use of public services and utilities for small office buildings_ Proposed measure to . reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflict. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive_Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Supportive of 26 goals, objectives. and policies of the (p.26) •111 ' .1 .1 1. 11 •u- • 1 '1 and Objective 1 (p.34). Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Minimize cut and fill necessary for building site and parking area grades. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To rezone the property from R -4 residential to P -O) office use to facilitate office development in harmony with other offices uses along Southcenter Blvd. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? none 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Simple action to facilitate office development along Southcenter Boulevard or not 1 • 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Com Plan while havin• some c .26 and Ob 'ecti ve 1 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Minimize cut and fill necessary for building sits and parking area grades. -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only n is Ior ..t, the Corny' L id i atinp your land with reference to streets and tuner Parcels It is believed to be (57 sums no liability for any Toss occurring by reason of reliance thereon. / SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TRACS' / 1 1NAcr I2 y1/ 77•11.4 •- �O/_NI 1,71. A RCA G 14* Gases tit )'Vw S 2f1 mono DEC k 21986 CITY Tur;iv1LA PLANNING DEPT. VICINITY MAP Nif LAND USE & ZONING; LOCATION ZONING LAND USE PROPOSED SITE PRESENT - R -4 PRESENT - VACANT PROPOSED - P -0 PROPOSED - PROFESSIONAL /OFFICE BLDG. WEST OF ISTE P -0 C -1 NORTH OF SITE R -4 EAST OF SITE SOUTH OF SITE -130-- 100 70 R -4 P -0 PARKING LOT /OFFICE BLDG. MINI -MART- SERVICE STATION CONDOMINIUMS RESIDENTAL PROFESSIONAL /OFFICE BLDG. SOUTHCENTER BLVD. I -405 SECTION A - A • 1 ":30' -0" t L C> POSSIBLE BLDG. AREA L PROPERTY LINE SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD SITE PLAN Am ALPHA ENGINEERS INC. O V L • STRUCTURAL ENO.Ea.o COMMA TS Q 3HOOVER PARK (An wins. MOMS SITE PLAN & PROFILE