HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-36-90 - MA SEGALE / MILLER STEVEN - 6,720 SF SHOP ADDITIONSEGALE, INC.
SHOP ADDITION
18801 SOUTHCENTER
PARKWAY
EPIC -36 -90
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459-6000
November 28, 1990
Rick Beeler
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mr. Beeler:
Although there is no comment period on the determination of
nonsignificance for the M.A. Segale Inc Shop Addition, we reviewed
the environmental checklist and have the following comments.
SEPA requires the proponent of an application to consider the
impacts of the proposed project on public services, including
solid waste. The applicant should refer to the County Com-
prehensive Solid Waste Management Plan to ensure that the
intent of this plan with regard to waste management and recy-
cling is net Beyond this,, :the office of Waste Reduction,
Recycling`arid'Litter Control requests the''applicant to con -.
sider• the following :: •
The building should be designed to accommodate recycling.
Opportunities for recycling aluminum, glass, newspaper,
corrugated containers, shrink wrap and other plastics, high
and low grade office paper, and materials as appropriate
should be made as convenient as throwing them out. Space
should be provided to accommodate the storage of recyclable
materials both in the building and next to the outdoor refuse
disposal area for centralized collection.
Of note, the Best Management Practices Analysis for Solid
Waste compiled for our office indicates that the volume of
waste produced by restaurants is 3.14 tons per employee per
year. In a typical restaurant, some 36 percent of the waste
stream is comprised of food wastes and another 20 percent of
various grades of paper (including corrugated containers)
while another 14 percent is various grades of plastics.
During the construction /landscaping phase of the building, we
encourage the builder to use compost and products made from
recycled materials wherever possible. Compost can be used as
a Soil amendment in landscaping and as a mulch over newly
planted beds as well as in 'erosion control.: Uses of products
containing recycled materials include parking lot bumper
stops, park and picnic benches, landscape timb (N nr (�
posts made from recycled plastic, rubberized a pha( 'rtrdlf ►��! °,
with recycled tires, glassphalt made with grow d g ass, insu-
lation and other building materials, etc. \ NOV 3 01990
•
Rick Beeler
November 28, 1990
Page 2
If you have any questions, please call Peter. Christiansen of
our Northwest Regional Office at 867 -7048.
Sincerely,
Brenden McFarland
Environmental Review Section
BMF:
6561
cc: Janet Thompson -Lee
Peter Christiansen
A : i ' A N 1 1 it F U iJ I It i li U f 1 U N
1, DIANN MARIINEZ
❑ Notice of Public Hearing
El Notice of Public Meeting
❑ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet
❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet
0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet
❑ Short Subdivision Agenda Packet
❑ Notice of Application for
Shoreline Management Permit
❑ Shoreline Management Permit
hereby declare that:
Determination of Nonsignificance
❑ Mitigated Determination of Non -
significance
[] Oetermination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
O Notice of Action
❑ Official Notice
❑ Other
❑ Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on NOVEMBER 15, 1990
SEE ATTACHED
Name of Project SEGALE, IjVC. SKOP ADDITION
File Number
EPIC -36 -90
WAC 197 -11 -970
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal To construct an addition of approximately 6,720 square feet
to the North of the existing shop facility.
Proponent M.A. Segale, Inc.
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 18801 Southcenter Pkwy.
Sec. 35 Township 23 Range 4E, Tukwila, Wa.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -36 -90
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[I There is no comment period for this DNS
[( This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
. The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Rick Beeler
Position /Title Planning Director
Phone 433 -1846
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukw L, ''=' :188
Date / IPPO Signature %�
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
'Y OF TUKWILA
;OUTHCENTERBOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
•
M.A. SEGALE, INC.
P.O. BOX 88050
TUKWILA, WA. 98138
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
TUKWILA, WA 98188
(206) 433 -1800
TO:
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SECTION
CENTRAL OPERATIONS PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
CAMPUS MAIL STOP PV -11
OLYMPIA, WA. 98504 -8711
Control No. /,C 7 U 714
Epic File No. 36-90
Fee $225.00 Receipt No.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Addition
2. Name of applicant: M. A. Segale, Inc.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Address of Applicant: M. A. Segale, Inc.
P. O. Box 88050
Tukwila, WA. 98138
Contact Person: Stephen E. Miller
Telephone Number: (206) 575 -3200
4. Date checklist prepared: October 17, 1990
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Applicant has applied for a Building Permit from the City of Tukwila and upon
obtaining same intends to complete construction of the proposed shop addition as
soon as possible.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
NO.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
NONE.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
NO.
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
City of Tukwila Building Permit
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form
to include additional specific information on project description.)
Proposal is to construct an addition of approximately 6,720 square feet to the
north of the existing shop facility located at 18801 Southcenter Parkway.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist.
Located at the M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Facility at 18801 Southcenter Parkway,
Tukwila, Washington.
Site Plan and Vicinity Map are attached as to the Building Permit application.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
NO.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Sega le, Inc. Shop Addition
3
Environmental Checklist (continued)
TO BB COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS:
1. Earth
A. General description of the site
(circle /underline one): flat, rolling,
hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
N/A
B. What is the steepest slope on the site
(approximate percent slope)?
Less than three percent (3 %)
C. What general types of soils are found on
the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the
classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime
farmland.
Glacial till overlain with gravel
D. Are there surface indications or history
of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
NO.
E. Describe the purpose, type, and
approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of
fill.
Purpose of filling and grading will be only as necessary to
accomplish proposed building construction. The type of fill will be
clean sand and gravel. Approximate quantity is estimated to be
negligible.
F. Could erosion occur as a result of
clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
NO.
G. About what percent of the site will be
covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example,
asphalt or buildings)?
NONE.
Environmental Checklist (City o[ Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Addition
- 4 -
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
H. Proposed measures to reduce or control
erosion, or other impacts to the earth,
if any:
N /A.
2. Air:
A. What types of emissions to the air would
result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile odors, industrial wood smoke)
during construction and when the project
is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities
if known.
Minimal dust from construction equipment
which will be controlled with limited
use of water.
B. Are there any off -site sources of
emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
' NO.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control
emissions or other impacts to air, if
any:
N /A.
3. Water:
A. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on
or in the immediate vicinity of
the site (including year -round and
seasonal streams, saltwater,
lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes,
describe type and provide names.
If appropriate, state what stream
or river it flows into.
NO.
Environmental Checklist (City or Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Seple, Inc. Shop Addition
- 5 -
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
2) Will the project require any work
over, in, or adjacent to (within
200 feet) the described waters?
If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
NO.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and
dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the
area of the site that would be
affected. Indicate the source of
fill material.
NONE.
4) Will the proposal require surface
water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose,
and approximate quantities if
known.
NO.
5) Does the proposal lie within a
100 -year floodplain? If so, note
location on the site plan.
NO.
6) Does the proposal involve any
discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe
the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
NO.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila) - 6
RE: M. A. Sega le, Inc. Shop Addition
Agency Use Only
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or
will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
NO.
2) Describe waste material that will
be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic
sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals .
agricultural; etc.). Describe the
general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number
of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s)
are expected to serve.
N /A.
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Sega le, Inc. Shop Addition
1) Describe the source of runoff
(including storm water) and method
of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known).
Where will this water flow? Will
this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
Source of runoff will be storm
water consistent with current
conditions only and is anticipated
to be negligible.
- 7 -
Agency Use Only
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
2) Could waste materials enter ground
or surface waters? If so,
generally describe.
NO.
D. Proposed measures to reduce or control
surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
N /A.
4. Plants:
A. Check or circle types of vegetation
found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
_ shrubs
_ grass
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other
_ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
_ other types of vegetation
B. What kind and amount of vegetation will
be removed or altered?
NONE.
C. List threatened or endangered species
known to be on or near the site.
NONE.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila) - 8
RE: M. A. Sega le, Inc. Shop Addition
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
D. Proposed landscaping, use of native
plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
N /A.
5. Animals:
A. Circle /underline any birds and animals
which have been observed on or near the
site or are known to be on or near the
site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
B. List any threatened or endangered
species known to be on or near the site.
NONE.
C. Is the site part of a migration route?
If so, explain.
NO.
D. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance
wildlife, if any:
NONE.
Environmental Checklist (Qty of Tukwila) - 9
RE: M. A. Sega le, Inc. Shop Addition
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
A. What kinds of energy (electric, natural
gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's
energy needs? Describe whether it will
be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electricity and Gas - existing.
B. Would your project affect the potential
use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
NO.
C. What kinds of energy conservation
features are included in the plans of
this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
NONE.
7. Environmental Health:
A. Are there any environmental health
hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,
spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If
so, describe.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Sega Ie, Inc. Shop Addition
NONE.
1) Describe special emergency
services that might be required.
N /A.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or
control environmental health
hazards, if any:
Compliance with applicable
regulations.
- 10 -
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. Noise:
1) What types of noise exist in the
area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other ?)
NONE.
2) What types and levels of noise
would be created by or associated
with the project on a short -term
or a long -term basis (for example:
traffic, construction, operation,
other)? Indicate what hours noise
would come from the site.
No additional noise is
anticipated. Noise associated
with the project will be noise
associated with normal, short -
term, construction operation.
Hours will be from 7:00 a.m. -
7:00 p.m., Monday through
Saturday.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or
control noise impacts, if any:
NONE.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
A. What is the current use of the site and
adjacent properties?
Site and adjacent parcels owned by
applicant are currently being used for
applicant's construction business.
B. Has the site been used for agriculture?
If so, describe.
NO.
C. Describe any structures on the site.
Shop Facility
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Segiile, Inc. Shop Addition
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
D. Will any structures be demolished? If
so, what?
NO.
E. What is the current zoning
classification of the site?
M -1
F. What is the current comprehensive plan
designation of the site?
M -1
G. If applicable, what is the current
shoreline master program designation of
the site?
N /A.
H. Has any part of the site been classified
as an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify.
NO.
I. Approximately how many people would
reside or work in the completed project?
Additional personnel as may be required.
J. Approximately how many people would the
completed project displace?
NONE.
K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce
displacement impacts, if any:
N /A.
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal
is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
Compliance with applicable permits and
regulations.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Seple, Inc. Shop Addition
- 12 -
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
9. Housing:
A. Approximately how many units would be
provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low - income housing.
N /A.
B. Approximately how many units, if any,
would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low - income housing.
NONE.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control
housing impacts, if any:
N /A.
10. Aesthetics:
A. What is the tallest height of any
proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal
exterior building material(s) proposed?
Proposed addition will be 24 feet in
height (same as the height of the
existing structure).
B. What views in the immediate vicinity
would be altered or obstructed?
N /A.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control
aesthetic impacts, if any:
N /A.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Sega le, Inc. Shop Addition
- 13 -
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare:
A. What type of light or glare will the
proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
NONE.
B. Could light or glare from the finished
project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views?
NO.
C. What existing off site sources of light
to glare may affect your proposal?
NONE.
D. Proposed measures to reduce or control
light and glare impacts, if any:
N /A.
12. Recreation:
A. What designated and informal
recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
NONE.
B. Would the proposed project displace any
existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
NO.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control
impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided
by the project or applicant, if any:
N /A.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Sega le, Inc. Shop Addition
- 14 -
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COLLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation:
A. Are there any places or objects listed
on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be
on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
NO.
B. Generally describe any landmarks or
evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known
to be on or next to the site.
NONE.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control
impacts, if any:
N /A.
14. Transportation:
A. Identify public streets and highways
serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system.
Show on site plans, if any.
Southcenter Parkway.
B. It site currently served by public
transit? If not, what is the
approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
No. Nearest transit stop is on South
180th Street - approximately 1 mile
north of the site.
C. How many parking spaces would the
completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
N /A.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Addition
- 15 -
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
D. Will the proposal require any new roads
or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including
driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
NO.
. E. Will the project use (or occur in the
immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally
describe.
NO.
F. How many vehicular trips per day would
be generated by the completed project?
If known, indicate when peak volumes
would occur.
None. No increased traffic is
anticipated.
G. Proposed measures to reduce or control
transportation impacts, if any:
N /A.
15. Public Services:
A. Would the project result in an increased
need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection,
health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe.
NO.
B. Proposed measures to reduce or control
direct impacts on public services, if
any.
N /A.
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Addition
- 16 -
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
16.
Utilities:
A. Circle /underline utilities currently
available at the site: electricitv,
natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic
system, other.
B. Describe the utilities that are proposed
for the project, the utility providing
the service and the general construction
activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be
.needed.
NONE.
C. SIGNATURE:
The above answers are true and complete to the best
of my knowledge, I understand that the lead agency
is relying on them to make its decision.
OWNER /AGENT SIGNATURE: —/ /—
M. A. SE ALLY`,
M. A. Segale,
DATE SUBMITTED: /0/4190
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Addition
- 17 -
INC.,
President
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental
information provided and the submitted plans, documents,
supportive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
To construct an addition to the existing shop
facility.
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing
these objectives?
Not constructing an addition.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate
the preferred course of action:
Not constructing an addition is an unacceptable
alternative given applicant's current business needs
Environmental Checklist (City or Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Addition
- 22 -
• •
Environmental Checklist (continued) Evaluation for
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Agency Use Only
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the
Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so,
what policies of the Plan?
NO
5. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
NOT APPLICABLE (See Answer to 4. above)
Environmental Checklist (City of Tukwila)
RE: M. A. Segale, Inc. Shop Addition
-23-
CITY OF TUKWILA _
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMOITAL REVIEW
ROUTING FORM
EPIC: -36- 90
, Id
.Plann
•
. .
PUb
t.t*1
• .• • :2* :1•.*
PROJECT, s-e?,44; /At , she,e). ,44),"5„,-72,0 2.
ADDRESS
DATE TRANSMITTED /Q1dO/570 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
STAFF COORDINATOR 450,7 DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
„ - • •
The • a chiia enviOrimental •cheOlilist. was received regarding •this proJect Pleas� reViayt
commOit bplow Icadvisa the reapOnsibte Otcialregarding the threshold' eteims .
. T. • :
Yirgrimantal.rayiew file Is available in the Planning Department through the above.%
. .
InatOr.; .Cor6ments regetrcling the project you Wish carried to the PlannIng•Pornmisso.
3oard 01 Adjustment and Pity Council should be submitted In the ConiMent Section bet
-••••• .•...;.. ' • • : ' • •
ITEM
COMMENT
Date: Comments prepared by: ,
09114/011
ENVIRONNIANTAL REVIEW
R FORM
CITY OrTUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OP 'COMMUNITY
PROJECT,
DEVELOPMENT
EPIC: -36.9
ADDRESS ggD/: -- S r17 e
•
DATE TRANSMITTED / %gyp 9d RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /• q 'p
STAFF COORDINATOR �4coJ G DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
•
•
Ohed enviro linen hec ctis was eCenre� �9arc�f tfi%pro
a* •:•:' Aw tq€`::adviSe th YTeSpattSibte� cfiioia rea8rdin
.6, .4610.*:„. its • is av trabt �n a ?lanni�gaDepartment • throw,
�ments:rega ding the project you, w+nshhcarriedtta tho Plain
ustm-ent phoutd be submitted irt the comma
r
ITEM
COMMENT
cP-d?U,u�itaxe -O Gami//6
Date:
%/- /yd Comments prepared by: ,
CITY OF�.TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONn�t TAL REVIEW
ROUTING FORM
EPIC: -.6 -.9
,,,.�,�•. yam: c-.
DATE TRANSMITTED
jt,9d ..
STAFF. COORDINATOR -. 01,e-e ' „L.Sdoi
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY / .?Ao
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
•b6>• .,:x s,p a:l�'yol %p2 F f x Q> �"r ii,t• . Fs yr/'kE'" >asa°k3
��>�n.�"'ve "�'3r�`Fis�cs3•�k k.R•Y � s1�+ Y �' �'� �.i�..s A�� > s yk r.�tiar> a r �C ^'i ->?!
ed evttrrnzenta checklis was rec ive re ardi this roechteass revraw
f fw t *ad11isa t fa lesPot ibtOofiio araega n fhbthF85h0id det natiotlk �
re r0.144f• file is av t bf in the Planni
n
��� tit � � � .
>: am •k > r
meats regarding the project you wi
ustrriet acrd City CouncO should be submi ted
• Qepartment thr t h tt e'anov8 $I�
sftcarr�cd to the Pi hTng orl�mii
e Ott.
ITEM
COMMENT
•
•
Date: /� r30 -70 Comments prepared by:
OW 141811
CITY 'OritiKWILA •
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONIVIANTAL REVIEW
ROUTING FORM
EPIC: - fel
PROJECT _5. 4141yA/c., A4)/4994 2.
ADDRESS -•."7.:'-t;41-1V.01,4,- PAteok/-41
DATE 17IANSMITTEDT 61 y;,e)
STAFF COORDINATOR ,Exeex) &,45,00/1
'610,0404501 41i
. .
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /0-•40
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
hmeiitarc)1thU wivd c0 iird1nt ihE es ro e
t:10`javajtatilt
.b0.:..4sbtf.....titSjd.,10,11116Pftt...:.:.. . 1,00. ...„n .
Council su m .13 . e.common.se c
ITEM
•
• - • • - • ***
• sVs* • - • • ,s
•
COMMENT
• • •
.. •
Date: Comments prepared by:
DATE INTT
MTP
ACTIVII. LOG
COMMENTS
October 15, 1990
7:00 p.m.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor VanDusen called the Regular Meeting of the
Tukwila City Council to order and led the audience in
the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL JOE DUFFIE; DENNIS ROBERTSON; JOAN HERNANDEZ,
Council President; CLARENCE MORIWAKI; ALLAN EKBERG;
STEVE LAWRENCE, JOHN RANTS.
Tukwila City Hall
Council Chambers
OFFICIALS MIKE KENYON, City Attorney; JOHN McFARLAND, City
Administrator; RICK REELER, Director, Department of Community
Development; ROSS EARNST, Public Works Director.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Mayor VanDusen introduced Rhonda Berry to the Council and
welcomed her to the City. Rhonda has joined the staff as the Assistant
to the City Administrator.
CITIZEN COMMENTS Dharlene Crostick, 14406 - 58th Ave. So., requested information on
two issues: 1)the Rebanco dump site; 2) Council's plan to go on
record regarding Initiative 547. In response to the first question, John
McFarland stated that the City of Renton has indicated they will work
closely with Tukwila during the developmental stages of the property
since the visual impacts of anything that happens there will be visited
upon Tukwila and not Renton. The EIS has been published in draft
form and is currently being reviewed by City staff. The property lies
within the Renton limits and is not in Tukwila's jurisdiction.
Regarding the impacts of traffic on the City, Rick Beeler, Director of
the Department of Community Development, reported that DCD and
public works staff met with Renton and King County earlier today to
discuss the proposal and the traffic mitigation that may, be associated
with this and future projects. The Rebanco roject is a recycling of
construction materials. Materials are brow t to the site in trucks, at the site, sorted, and trucked o by category. The site is
across the river from Monster Road on the lefthand corner going
north. The question is how to handle Monster Road as it goes up to
Martin Luther King Way. Staff is also very concerned about esthetics.
Councilmember Moriwaki added that he had received a flyer in the
mail noting a community workshop on the subject scheduled for
October 23rd at 7 p.m. at the Renton Community Center. In answer to
Ms. Crostick's second question regarding Council's stand on Initiative
547, Councilmember Ekberg responded that the Council has not
discussed the issue to date.
CONSENT
AGENDA a. Approval of Minutes: October 1, 1990
b. Approval of Vouchers
General Fund $105,542.08
City Street 32,165.48
Arterial Street 21 059.05
Land Acq., Building, Dev. 19,625.73
Water Fund 767.83
Sewer Fund 66,431.96
Water/Sewer Construction 20,326.21
Foster Golf Course 9,350.94
4prface Water (412) 1,959.53
Equipment Rental 1,561.20
Special Assessments (205). L.I.D. #32 40.12
Firemen's Pension 250.00
TOTAL. $476,080.13
c. Authorize Mayor to execute loan agreement with the Public
Works Trust Fund emergency division and reimburse the
Surface Water Utility for funds advanced to King County to
complete Segale Dike Repair.
Minutes - Regular Meeting
October 15, 1990
Page 2
Consent Agenda (con't)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Appeal of the Decision of
the Board of Architectural
Review - 62nd Ave. So.
Apartments Project (Sunwood
Request for Waiver to
Ord. #1582 (moratorium) -
M.A. Segale
Public Hearing Closed
7:30 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS
Res. #1157 Requesting
King County to Activate
the Green River Flood
Control Zone District
(GRFCZD)
Resolution Prohibiting
Parking on Various City
Streets
d. An ordinance amending Ord. #1580 which adopted King County
development regulations for specific permit applications for real
property commonly known as the Cascade View Annexation
Area to include provisions for Travel Lodge.
MOVED BY DUFFLE, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT
THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor VanDusen announced that the parties involved in
public hearing had submitted written requests asking for a
for a second continuance.
MOVED BY RANTS, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, TO
CONTINUANCE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO NOVEMBER 5,
1990. MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor VanDusen opened the public hearing. Hick Beeler, Director of
the Department of Community Development, explained that the
applicant is requesting the waiver in order to construct an addition for
general equipment maintenance to the north side of the current shop
structure at 18801 Southcenter Parkway. Part of the applicant's
property is on sloes greater than 15 percent; however, the 6700
square foot addition would be constructed on an area that is currently
paved and would be located approximately 48 feet from the toe of the
slope. It would not be affected by the sensitive areas ordinance as now
drafted. It is the recommendation of the staff that the request be
considered with the condition that the applicant agree to conform to
the adopted Sensitive Areas Ordinance.
Bill Arthur, M.A. Segale Co., added that the construction will take
place on a portion of the property paved 23 years ago.
MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY EKBERG, THAT
THE WAIVER BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT
FILING AN AGREEMENT TO CONFORM TO THE ADOPTED
SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT THE
PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY.
MOTION CARRIED.
Attorney Kenyon read a Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tukwila, Washington, requesting the King County Council activate the
Green River Flood Control Zone District ( GRFCZD) for the purpose
of funding flood control activities within the authority of the district
as established pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington, Title 86,
Section 15.
MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT
RESOLUTION NO. 1157 BE APPROVED AS READ. MOTION
CARRIED.
MOVED BY DUFFLE, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT THE
PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY.
MOTION CARRIED.
Attorney Kenyon read a Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tukwila, Washington, prohibiting parking on various streets to
maintain pedestrian and vehicle safety.
MOVED BY DUFFLE, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT THE
PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ.*
Mayor VanDusen opened discussions to citizens for their comments.
Rene Fabre, 14844 - 42nd Ave., commented that she feels the street is
0
Z
SOOONN'E 29t .0
•
•
Oi
A
ex l s r /N`
A S.NH
irNe1237 -he rlc.PY' _y
DAIYEWAY
._11-r--5-041721 _ -
ier
AREA CINDER.
PERMIT
4 r je/3'.If
/i• 3K.MY
L: /e /.Lt
T.• BZzf
EXIST INa ASPNALTv?
TUKWILA.WA.
KING COUNTY
a s 12'32 00
Z 300'.
L vC.f.Li
h 321Y •
BUILDING AREA
Existing Building Area
Area Square Feet
A 10.000
B 1,680
C
5,664
D 3.28•
E 1,416
F
3,360
G 3.300
New Shop Addition
TOTAL AREA
28.988
6,720
33.708
MA SEGALE, I NC
Daft
3-10.90
G5C.
SHOP BUILDING EXTENSION
SITE PLANT /29°' a..axe
Sowt cHr(R ,' ,y
TUKWILA,WA.
KING COUNTY
MA SEGALE, I NC
APPROSSO ST
3 -10 -9a
PA AWIN
GSC.
SHOP BUILDING EXTENSION
SITE PLANT
X880/ 2 a
SOU7CC■rc4 Atvy
AT • IA •11111010 es AS In= ISAINNOMIN •
MO1N, b4 FPI% 'U
11000141465 vr/L
�m1t, e611.414 PGti.koly, 514.4.
1(P11.4 WA1A, c.1►orJ
10' -0
MI ever
tee PCP
irL,00 5 SFiG'f101•�
,_p
ININNIMINEM
444 1144
Gulipoti tfy.
f
'b
W
i
'
0
CI
e6Yauv
yc„wo LEvtL-
Uoa.m ELfry -1100
W L6■l0(11otJ
PicfiU15H60 M11, 12600d4
Coutolcu6 (,tjnet
..1111V111I!IUI
/ P126F11J16Hifl1 Mfl. 1 Olp If.
It
d
e
An✓I.JhPour
t,F.vnkfloil
v
c
0
0
c
0
c
0
c
u.
0
tt
•
0
1
0
0
Q-
0
dJ v
0 "
n
'0
a
a
0
mm
}1 i
tor
AN mco
+ .Y
-"a- c s
ez
shoes
TUKWILA,WA.
KING COUNTY
......._ •o..•...
BUILDING AREA
Emitting Building Area
Area Square Feet
A 10,080
B
1,680
C 3.66♦
O 3.288
1.416
F 1.360
G 3.300
New Shop Addition
28.988
6.720
TOTAL AREA 33.708
e. e: 3 -io•?0
MA SEGALE, I NC
Esc.
OtVINLO
SHOP BUILDING EXTENSION
,ego, m..a
S I T E PL A N 1 jo�rrcNT PK'..r e. p I
TUKWILA,WA.
KING COUNTY
MA SEGALE, I NC
.u1: , -3V • �....e.m r: ClIrli.e.
o..,: ,3 -/0.90
GSC.
SHOP BUILDING EXTENSION
.moo. �,-.°
SITE PL A N 15=',„ (A, a.. 2
t )
PP.NNWuP Htl• Pfc'
ufifi- w fN�k
vIIflL GAcbn IrmohtI4N
MO N. Guw f I?►tt6
lyp.JJFJ\t114.66 w1'.
QpbfI015HW Milo 61DINI.
\I►1A...fAwap IueJlgnaJ
-tack, WII.DJN. 0441
kft{ku(I v Pppvnl b
ppf 4
• -I
(AL IJ. Q( 4411.5 6NGIt
W1-1/ ‘C/-r 100
10'.0 x
0111bpIub RJS LJ t
MOLtI. G1. —
0.4 rtDV
tit, ekffb
Nuv
c.e ROO,
LQ-o4' , S6&nod
GUAZA ►at
464 ka\lj
C6Potok, DWG
E6Ya-n)
yy�yv 14vti.
W Myr-
P
0
�oQI EI,evAnoLl
1.) kovnt1o,J
C Atai I4NfOD 111L QLt)f1.JL
.11
u
J —�
Lau I,Jou9 44flf g
/ f6f1U1414 O Mil. 40114. "L
0
Gbw000rout
EPA( �t.F.v/�'flol�
c
0
i
0
C
0
c
ti O
•
0
1
0
O
,17-s
0'31
D
E
10
01
0
17
m
1 01
w
• Ol
wQ •-
Eo
w0 •
Ogi
O
.h.s