Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-37-90 - CDA ARCHITECTS - ANDOVER PARK RETAILANDOVER PARK RETAIL 100 ANDOVER PARKWAY EPIC -37 -90 CDP. Architects Planners Interiors April 19, 1991 ARCHITECTS, INC. Mr. Darren Wilson City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: ANDOVER PARK RETIAL #90 -16 -DR Dear Mr. Wilson: This project is no longer being developed as first proposed. We current owners of the property on new development proposals. I would like to formally withdraw our application for the B.A.R. review Sincerely, SIGN ARCHITECTS, INC. GEr_MI LAPR22 1991 CITY OF Ti;Kvvl't.A PLANNING DEPT. are negotiating on the Andover with the past and Park Retail Center. 4230 198th Street S.W. • Lynnwood, WA 98036 • (206) 771 -2300 • Fax: (206) 672 -4244 CONVERSATION RECORD DATE: 3 / 14 / 91 .tW TUE WEDI Ili! TIME: A.M. SAT SUN 4:30 P.M. TYPE: ® Visit ❑ Conference ❑ Telephone — Olncoming 0Outgoing Name of person(s) contacted or In contact with you: Pat Kerney - CDA Architects Organization (office, dept., bureau, etc.) CDA Architects Location of Visit/Conference: FVF� U1 =1:I6E USE (JNLY Telephone No.: Public Works Conference Room SUBJECT: ANDOVER PAR K' "RETAI=L- 'CENTER"TRAFF 1 C 1 MPACT ANALYSIS The following intersections to be looked at in the trip generation, circulation study (Per Ron Cameron): Do the "checked" intersections, noon and PM peak and Christmas. Attachment (1) PF /amc:8:rec2 OP .fie.. I5OT" ST S 152ND ST 1) 'I � I S ST 1 ShiSGTH ST "uh,Hobt >L- a= • > 151ST vi — s ;51ST P: 2 3 =�= \cp I 14t NORTHERN LA' 4 0 -7c-, N f1 O `OO S 1515390 _1 `` 1 uicn TUKW /LA _ ., SH ~1 Q 160Th T >L 1 v� q < > is :et-r, 4<< ST unt - . J (b 112ND ST -• �v \%), CRYSTAL' •9l SPR/NG . - CA) sT- >y < ST 156 l' Race! t C �n Track' YI� `Z ICnIW i 1 rack'' Itl✓ lc . . 10 INCTI N't. S 163RD .ra n • .7-1— 1r, > 163RD J 1 -> etc 66TH ST 1 " S 167TH ST 5 168TH S 168TH HT LN • • J 170TH rS T (I) ST (1) icr BL S 168- i TRECK DK z{ cr 0 z 1 < !„4,DTA C �L S 172ND PL ST 1757t-4 CORP RATE D- __ _t MINKLER ! BLyp COMMUN/TY - NEa(TH � _ I t i „Tit �; 25 Skv 33RE ST a' I of — - -- Transportation and Traffic Engineering PLANNING • DESIGN • RECEIVED The FEB 2 0 1991 Transpo PUBL C RKS Group February 19, 1991 TG: 91221.00 Mr. Kurt Jensen Commercial Design Architects Inc. 4230 - 198th Street SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 SUBJECT. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE ANDOVER PARK RETAIL CENTER Dear Mr. Jensen: Thank you for asking The TRANSPO Group to assist you with the Andover Park Retail Center project. This letter presents the results of project trip generation, distribution; and assignment analyses. This information will be reviewed with Ron Cameron, City of Tukwila Engineer, to identify the off -site locations (if any) which need to be analyzed to complete the traffic study for the project. Project Description The project will consist of an 80,600 -gross square foot (gsf) shopping center. The tenants for the project are currently envisioned to be Olympic Sports, a computer store, and a hardware store. This development will replace an existing 81,574 -gsf warehouse /office building on the site. Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment The daily, noon, and PM peak hour trip generation associated with the proposed and existing uses were calculated using the rates and regression equations from Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 4th Edition. As shown in Table 1, the gross retail trip generation was reduced by 25 percent to account for pass -by trips. The gross retail trip generation was also adjusted to reflect the existing traffic generated by the existing warehouse building. The net new project traffic generation (Table 1) was assigned to the site driveways and surrounding street system, based on the trip distribution (Figure 1) documented in the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Southcenter Mall Expansion ( TRANSPO, December 27, 1990). The trip distribution for the Southcenter Mall Expansion was previously reviewed with Ron. Figures 2, 3, and 4 summarize the daily, noon, and PM peak hour assignments, respectively. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14715 Bel -Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98007 FAX:2061747 -3688 2061641 -3881 Mr. Kurt Jensen February 19, 1991 Page 2 The Transpo Group We will be meeting with Ron on Thursday, February 21. at 10:30 a.m., to further discuss the project traffic study. A copy of this letter is being sent to Ron for his review. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, iric. W. Toedtli, P.E. Transportation Engineer LWr /mlm Attachments cc: Ron Cameron. City of Tukwila Table 1. Trip Generation Summary A. Proposed Shopping Center, Code 820 Area: 80,600 Equation Gross Pass -By New Trips (25 percent) Trips Daily In (1) = 0.65 In (X) + 5.92 6,459 1,615 4,844 Noon Peak Total (T) _ (1.1) • PM Peak Hour 460 115 345 Noon Peak In 50 percent 230 57 172 Noon Peak Out 50 percent 230 58 173 PM Peak Total In (T) . 0.52 In (X) + 4.04 557 139 418 PM Peak In 50 percent 278 69 209 PM Peak Out 50 percent 278 70 209 B. Existing Warehouse Area: 81,574 Rates Existing Traffic Daily 4.882 398 Noon Peak Total 0.5 • PM Peak Hour 30 Noon Peak In 50 percent 15 Noon Peak Out 50 percent 15 PM Peak Total 0.740 X 60 PM Peak In 32 percent 19 PM Peak Out 68 percent 41 C. Net New Trips (A. minus B.) Pass -By Net New Trips Trips Daily 1,615 4,446 Noon Peak Total 115 315 Noon Peak In 57 157 Noon Peak Out 58 158 PM Peak Total 139 358 PM Peak In 69 190 PM Peak Out 70 168 Note: X = budding size (1,000 sQ; T= number of trips. ATTACHMENT 1 R.,, C�.y�ev .4T•-e,.ewwL 7 :`t'-'4v,n1 c liTN "Vb(r 4,epplatt t »Qoac� z r4rY • qtr JIL 3 Nab N«.. 7"Y4AAr� 94c1'V. J1L 9 qtr r• boNt er av\l ta4tAl1 Yet Ca "1r M_ pe.o.‘k lour �Q\c N(1.w MI28 -1f- )4 Cr"V.«.� CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA. WASHINGTON 98188 February 4, 1991 CDA Architects Pat Kearney 4230 198th Street S.W. Lynnwood, Wa. 98036 RE: ANDOVER PARK RETAIL EPIC -37 -90 PHONE # (206) 433.1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Dear Mr. Kearney: This letter is to inform you that Environmental Checklist (EPIC - 37-90) determination will not be made until a Traffic Analysis has been submitted. This issue was discussed at the Pre - Application meeting on Thursday, November 11, 1990. As a requirement by the City, we can not schedule the Public Hearing until the SEPA concerns are resolved. I have enclosed the comment sheet from our Public Works Department indicating that a Traffic Analysis is necessary as part of the SEPA process. you When we met at the counter on Wednesday, January 23, 1991 Y indicated that this project may be cancelled since the February 28, 1991 Public Hearing could not be met. Should this be the case please notify our office in writing. If you have any additional questions regarding this project, please contact me at 431 -3670. Thank You Darren Wilson Assistant Planner cc: J. Pace, Senior Planner M. Kenyon, City Attorney 'ITY OF.TUKWILA 'APARTMENT OP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONIUNTAL REVIEW ROUTI1G FORM r. � CL 4 t pQ r to ining � °�' fitiVl ",: AOJECT /7/21/e4 Aez *2 /G EPIC:- — 9.& ()DRESS 1 &d ATE TRANSMITTED TAFF COORDINATOR �OJ.0 AeX el, / R79/, RESPONSE REQUESTED BY /Ayr/ >'a uih r�YIS S ;°S i y DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED l ctseckltis was received rc thi &.proje 131.610:19,0M0._ w to advise the responsible officiarregerding the ttiiesho� •entat jeV18 life is avai abio in tbe. Manning De artment throu 1 ,mints •regardingthe •project you ii sli carrted,to the 'Iaetnfn,� -� gent and City Gound1;: houtd be submitted in the comment sectibn> • ,r y .. a • o"` • - x- ,iJ PY nS 'aA i�T < r S„i¢�t" • ?TEM COMMENT /7) cavo-EN-J dy\) e/J9411E-J d)-7-774/-/-#0\-- ate: / Comments prepared by: 09114109 ANDOVER PARK RETAIL Page 2 ;- Item #9 Change "No " .to: - Comp Water Plan - Andover Park West Street Improvement Project (Widening) - CBD Sidewalk Improvements (LID) • - Proposed Metro Bus Pullout at APW and Baker Blvd. Page 3 - Item #10 Add: - Utility Permits /FCZP /Grade and Fill Permit (5000 c.y. material) Street use /access permits /hauling permit City Review /approval of scope and final recommendations of developer's consultant traffic study Developer's agreement for traffic right -of -way and public water main improvements and . donation of right -of -way Temporary erosion control plan Page 5 - Item #1 h Add: Provide City with temporary erosion plan for review /approval Page 6 - Item #5 Add: Provide lowest floor elevation surveyed per NGVD datum and review FEMA flood study of Alpha Engineers P -17 basin study to verify. Page 15 - Item 14- a`thru g and Page 16 - item 15 a and b In order to provide a complete response to these questions, a traffic study needs to be accomplished. o leas Camero , E - -r a 433 - 79 Scope of Study`— Traffic analysis to include but not be limited to: Trip Generation /Distribution for. 1 • • [1] APW (Tukwila Parkway to Strander) [2] APE (Tukwila Parkway to Strander) [3] Tukwila Parkway (T -line to S -line) [4] Strander Blvd. (Southcenter Pkwy. to Tukwila Pkwy.) [5] This traffic analysis to include looking at use of Evans - Black Drive (to APE) for access - Peak periods to include - AM /Noon /PM /AWDT /Christmas holidays for both � A. Existing conditions B. After development C. With w /proposed mall upgrade and Mervin's D. With APW street widening (3- 12/2 -11's) E. With Metro bus turnout - Provide LOS Analysis for following intersections: [1] APW /Tukwila Parkway [2] APW /Baker Blvd. [3] all [4] APW /Strander Blvd. [5] asoterrh4ea Evans Black Drive & APW [6] Petent4el Evans Black Drive & APE Identify driveway volumes and turning movements existing and proposed) on standard ITE diagram format Show existing and proposed driveway locations (both sides of APW) from Baker Blvd. to Tukwila Parkway. Also, show onsite circulation and turning movements for truck loading /unloading Review Safety (ped access) to mall /bus Included in analysis the following to be considered: A. Proposed APW street improvements: wideWning (includes reconstruction of outside [NB and SB] lanes /relocate curbs and gutter B. CBD sidewalk improvements (LID) C. Signalization at Baker Blvd. (including ped crossings) D. Transit pullouts including one at Metro bus pullout at northeast corner APW /Baker Blvd. - -etc- E. APW /Strander Blvd. signal modification 2 Provide warrant analysis for signals: [1] Baker Blvd. /APW [2] .w [3] Pedal Evans Black /AP and APE Page 17 - 16a - Remov- .round "water" and insert ( ?) by "water" Under response: Per review of Water Comp Plan, Ex. 8" %main in APW from Tukwila Parkway to Strander Blvd. provides deficient flows and must be upgraded Required as part of project. ,CD.D18.ANDOVER.RET 3 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER .PRE-APPLICATON CHECKLIST •` 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3870 ;MEETNMG • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Apply for and obtain the following permits/approvals through the City's Permit Center: Channelization/Striping /Signing .0 Sewer Main Extension (private) • Curb Cut/Access/Sidewalk Cl Sewer Main Extension (public) Q Excavation (public) n Storm Drainage • Fire 'loop/Hydrant (main to vault) (Q Water Main Extension (private) • Flood Zone Control Q Water Main Extension (public) Q Hauling (2.000 Bond. Cert. Ins.) (?) Water Meter (exempt) Landscape Irrigation Cl Water Meter (permanent) Q Moving an. Oversized Load Q Water Meter (temporary) Q Sanitary Side Sewer Q Other: GRAD' FILL V P M rj- (P -0 cat�!7t:0,0-‘ S ON- ume.-- 4'70)1w ovtk St) 4ti. 2. Hauling Permit required prior to start of any hauling of material on public right -of -way ($2,000 bond, $1,000,000 certificate of insurance, route map and $25.00 permit fee required). 3. All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the appli- cation forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. 4. Water and sewer assessments may apply and will be determined during the utility plan review process. . CwAi-LA ANA I11C AA n n.s,1 LL n:I ouIr,Ov Cvr1`\ 3 c� ►V, n P LIYYV R-t -� a crtrm an,� j , Provide sidewalks per Ordinance #1158, #1217 and #1 3, or obtain waiver. Provide Hydrological - Geotechnical analysis. 7. Provide erosion control plan as part of grading /fill permit application. 8. Identify building elevation above 100 year flood elevation per FIRM maps (use NGVD datum and recognized benchmarks). Ilk_i A IL. L4 sc - 11)40. F" \% P-L.y �.1s: P /b1Wr lJ iIN 9. Provide traffic analysis/trip generation study for c.o+- '( —ti -�� r.� c. r�,.r..r_,;v.,, Lt-ty EINCIIL It' 1�.rou ao) L -� s c.. I< <, Fu k_ s c.0 D 10. Provide developers ca reement for K /c `L.MITI bp-rIt;, s «','s .ro c t-r-r z /z. 11. Provide the following easements and maintenance agreements: R-10, anic w / 'Tt1APFtc Mrnt_Hskc (TRAP 610Qt.�I�`f!uw s�u�\-) . Aog!-rlu.s4►,L thS12M>a31- V L .tiD UC l74;4uln . - A.Pw. -- 13L'. 4JinH -r tr ro S • 1t' L.IM,['x ; c It sm us ot- R tL L:1117v1LLT • 12. Provide water /sewer availability letters or certificates from districts serving your development. L. rr' 13. Obtain Metro Waste Discharge permit or approval (684 - 2300). 14. Complete Industrial Waste Survey and return to Metro (self addressed and stamp provided).. o -P\ 15. Review the following City Studies when designing �your project and preparing your plan submittal :0 PRT U2uD1►v SLNIoIL 3L1).31:1. 4TL - 04(:4- (:4- twat -- C 133 O17q) FM Tc� pc-calrnl Nk It- t N 1 L4 &J'cu S To 7,4 c Sa.v/ #jjt. S 4 S'(17.....5 Q 16. oU LA(k 'DtvI- ks&PAttvT POL VT) ATEIVS t- A PLflT.S. Q 17. 1,.1,C LU DV) 11.1 "T 2t-P GrENL rT I OL) i'l k ,s71\ t R UT I t 1 N.) STIR (D`( I, Q 18. 71M-44:1:1C__ I S -'i o l_4o IC NT SE C. 19. -DZ..\\I Acc. sS . A s -U1')`1 -r c Loot, PT Q 20. 't ?E.LuPrn EM- `Patio urrnT s�'t -tAtt „IH +Fug 11,01•J►11,.t IATIb��s A, 1/.,. Ilft 1,..,s.-131Acte.. MIN CtF NPP(L.oP&,A ,p; ,E • Checklist prepared by (staff): Date. ANDOVER PARR RETAIL Page 2 - Item #9 - Change "No" to: - Comp Water Plan - Andover Park West Street Improvement Project (Widening) - CBD Sidewalk Improvements (LID) Proposed Metro Bus Pullout at APW and Baker Blvd. Page 3 - Item #10 Add: - Utility Permits /FCZP /Grade and Fill Permit (5000 c.y. material) Street use /access permits /hauling permit City Review /approval of scope and final recommendations of developer's consultant traffic study Developer's agreement for traffic right -of -way and public water main improvements and donation of right -of -way Temporary erosion control plan Page 5 - Item #1 h Add: Provide City with temporary erosion plan for review /approval Page 6 - Item #5 Add: Provide lowest floor elevation surveyed per NGVD datum and review FEMA flood study of Alpha Engineers P -17 basin study to verify. Page 15 - Item 14 -a thru g and Page 16 - item 15 a and b f In order to provide a complete response to these questions, a traffic study needs to be accomplished. Final Scope of Study to include: Traffic analysis to include but not be limited to: Trip Generation /Distribution for [1] APW (Tukwila Parkway to Strander) [2] APE (Tukwila Parkway to Strander) [3] Tukwila Parkway (T -line to S -line) 1 [4] [5] • • Strander Blvd. (Southcenter Pkwy. to Tukwila Pkwy.) This traffic analysis to include looking at use of Evans - Black Drive (to APE) for access Peak periods to include AM /Noon /PM /AWDT /Christmas holidays for both A. Existing conditions B. After development C. With w /proposed mall upgrade and Mervin's D. With APW street widening (3- 12/2 -11's) E. With Metro bus turnout Provide LOS Analysis for following intersections: APW /Tukwila Parkway APW /Baker Blvd. APW /Strander Blvd. Evans Black Drive & APW Evans Black Drive & APE Show existing and proposed driveway locations (both sides of APW) from Baker Blvd. to Tukwila Parkway. Identify driveway volumes and turning movements (existing and proposed) on standard ITE diagram format. Also, show onsite circulation and turning movements for truck loading /unloading Review Safety (ped access) to mall /bus Included in analysis the following to be considered: A. Proposed APW street improvements: widening (includes reconstruction of outside [NB and SB] lanes /relocate curbs and gutters) B. CBD sidewalk improvements (LID) C. Signalization at Baker Blvd. (including ped crossings) D. Transit pullouts including one at Metro bus pullout at northeast corner APW /Baker Blvd. E. APW /Strander Blvd. signal modification Provide warrant analysis for signals: [1] Baker Blvd. /APW 2 [2] Evans Black /APW [3] Evans Black /APE Page 17 - 16a - Remove circle around "water" and insert ( ?) by "water" Under response: Per review of Water Comp Plan, Ex. 8 "..6 main in APW from Tukwila Parkway to Strander.=Blvd. provides . deficient flows and must be upgraded Required as part of project. CD.D18.ANDOVER.RET 3 • - .17) Tu (C li4( LA Pit ,e>t 0 *.j 4W.. Sirt-Keas_ rsLur, 571\.Y\ ir■,0 T:= -b Purpose of Checklist: INVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WOOKR Nov :211990 CITY 7.1-6 I A PLANNING, DEPT, The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. -An-environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the . environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does no a ply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part 0). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT* B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, or er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soft to stiff sandy silt d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable . soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some .fill will be required to bring _.he North parking lot to grade (approxima _1y 4010n 5(100 cubic yards). f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary erosion control will be implemented during construction to prevent on -site erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% Evaluation for Agency Use Only Wvaluation for gency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: All constructing will meet or exceed minimum requirements including storm water drainage and tatenriou. . Air What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction some dust will occur. After project is complete, some automobile emissions will occur. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None______— 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.Ihe_Green pi „P,. • is approximately 1,500 feet from the site and flows into Puget Sound. w1/4 aluation for Iliency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. rj, • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water will he retained nn -site and discharged at a controlled rate to meet Cary of Tukwila' minimum requirements. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: 'aid r, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: cedar, pine, other x shrubs )( grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed • or altered? The site will have some existing vegetation removed and replayed with new .- landscaping. Y c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None -8- • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).. There may be an_approximatP 2 feet required by th @ity of Tukwila. rrad widoning e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 5533 trips /day 4:50 p.m. peak hours, this does not include existing trips generated by the existing building.. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, . police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire an Police. Proposed oroiect may require more protection by fire and police although the project is well lit and service at night and fire srinklered. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. See "a" above. -16- Evaluation for •ency Use Only )04 art, -� ITY OF TUKWILA FPARTMENT OP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT gf:•412.e0t."Vi.-. • 30JECT4 .)//e/2.. i42ez *i,c7/Z °DRESS i&o jow,:;1/41,6)e•A ATE TRANSMITTED //if/9/ TAFF COORDINATORp44e) DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED ..;:e0lronMental:criecIslistwas.MceiveOregardinglhi6-projeCt4.please...reyiew. belOvijc(:.ackise the:reSpOnsibte.officiarregardiriiIthe:threshOld:OetOninatiOlf::Ci:! ,nipental.reVle*file:16:.available in-the:planning .pepartMent•thkitigh..:tflt ii.)00;;!....COrnMents regarding the project you .Wish.carriedtO the Manning"..Commtstfo*, o1 Adjustment and City. CoUncil should be submitted In the •ComiiitintfieCtiOn betQw ENVIRONIVOITAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC: - 3Z 92 . erla/ • RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 7TEM ./1,6-7-te4 CO MENT 'ate: /--/ 7 Comments prepared by: 09/14/89 11TY OF TUKWILA !APARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROJECT Manning and le J49 z ��i/G ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC: - get Poke: DDRESS J f d ATE TRANSMITTED TAFF COORDINATOR ZJP.e i �eod � /LSOn RESPONSE REQUESTED BY DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED • 1xat�i 9 .s1P ^ ? ac �, 2 ` s a : 'A t Y •, • 0Aed, enviro�nmentat •checklist was received regarding this project4 Prerase review; :--rnent; below:faadvise the:responsibte;official regarding. the threshold detorminatior .a1 �nyironmontal rovtew;file ls:availabto in the Planning. Department: through the abovestal • ordict:�tor, ; Comments regarding:the project you wishcarried to tfie Plannt g Comm ss 3o 3 of Adjustment and City Council,should be submitted in .the oommsnt.. section beto F Y > t ITEM COMMENT /) Wilma, /v a, tieA "414 F. , ,t ,ameolie4A,647 A Wird Awal-outt ffv.e.dimutitelize40 yi,i /-(4 4 44.441111€4, /4/1 J/ 3) AGE G- G''r;►e u aadCe) ( /4 u:4 e,w , Z'te--- i?cox' fir a e., 1.a?e . • late: /-/O- Comments prepared by: 09114189 ACTIVI'1O LOG Ali Ai 4,4v Air /dam Aiz ' ,o 4, COMMENTS 4C 1 Control No. Epic FilSo. 3.L , Fee-44.6,8'78e Receipt No. ?j fo 77X00 122-5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND OPOWN NOV 211990 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Andover Park Retail CITY c:4'16vv, PLANNING DEPT, 2. Name of applicant: CDA Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: L230 l °stb StrPPt sw Lynnwood, WA 98036 (206) 771 -2300 Contact: Joe Donahou /Kurt Jensen 4. Date checklist prepared: November 16. 1990 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction would begin upon issuance of a buildin -• and complete construction approximately 10 -91. No phasing is anticipated. .- n .1111 • . 11. - 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA checklist City of Tukwila for building, plumbinz, and mechanical permit State of Washington for electrical permit. 11. Give brief; complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The proposed proiect consists of demolishing + 25_,000 SF of the existjIIg_3r1 building Slocated on the west side) and add an additional 2 900 SF of space _ta__ total approximately 80,600 SF of retail space located on five acres. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The proposed project is located at 100 Andover Parkway in Tukwila, Washington. SE1 +%4,- SE1 /4, Section 23, T 23N, R4F W.M. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for 411 411 Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one):(Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 07 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soft to stiff sandy silt d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some fill will be required to bring the North parking lot to grade (approximately 4ODD_tn_.00 cubic yards). f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary erosion control will be implemented during construction to prevent on -site erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% -4- '., ; .:!,.,::: :% Evaluation for •Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: All constructing will meet or exceed minimum r quirements including storm water drainage and L €tention.. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction some dust will occur. After project is complete, some automobile emissions will occur. • b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into..lhe Green RiZ,Pr - is approximately 1,500 feet from the site and flows into Puget Sound. -5- + Evaluation for •Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -6- . Ground: 1 .1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None .c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. srnrm wat r will be collected on-site and discharged at the City of Tukwila allowable rate into the City's storm water system. Evaluation for `gency Use Only Evaluation for •gency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. rTn d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water will be retained nn -Site and discharged at a controlled rate to meet City of Tukwila's minimum requirements. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: ald-r, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: cedar, pine, other shrubs ' )( grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site will have some existing vegetation removed and replaced with new landscaping, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None -8- - �.�: . Evaluation for •gency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping_yill incorporate grass. native plants. trees and flowers to romp-lament the site and blend with adjacent properties_ 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Landscaping will be proposed o nhance rhP site and possible enhance the appearance of songbirds. = .�` =. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used for heating and cooling and will be designated to meet the State of Washington Energy Code requirements. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Beuilding insulation and insulated windows per State of Washington Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None -10- Evaluation for •gency Use Only _.. �.... �... Evaluation for • "'Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The proposed project is close rn TnrerctarP Lns 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Sho t e •• • • - • • 11 - • • • working hours. •_ Long term: None 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any! -__Short any! - term: Control rrinsfrijrrion hours toa normal work day - nn nnicey rnncrruction being performed after hours_ 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is a 3M warehouse and offices. Adjacent properties include Southcenter Mall to the west and commercial uses to the other 3 sides. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. The site hag an existing 8L574' S.F. 3M wa eho�,s anri nffirac Evaluation for • •gency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? •• • and a portion of the warehouse (+ 6,000 S-F.) for a total of 25,000 S.F. • III e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Business Commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A 0 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 40 to 50 people will be working at this project at various hours. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A • k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project meets the current City of Tukwila zoning anc comprehensive plans. -12- •; �:. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 25 feet. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed project will meet the approval of the City of Tukwila's Board of Architectural Review. -13- Evaluation for • •gency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The parking lot will be lit t1nri ng rh F night but glare from the lights will be controlled by ' diffusers. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Cut -off diffusers will by incorporated into the parking lot 1igj,rg and almost eliminate off -site glare. 12'. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None -14- !'� ^`, 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or . objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed prnjert is next to AndnvPr Park W Access to this will be from two rurh ruts (3 are existing). b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 290 added - none eliminated -15- Evaluation for Sgency Use Only Evaluation for • .Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). There may be an approximate 2 fPPr read widening required by th eity of Tukwila. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 5533 trips /day 4:50 p.m. peak hours, this does not include existing trips generated by the existing building. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire an Police. Proposed project may require more protection by fire and police although the project is well lit and service at night and fire srinklered, b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. See "a" above. -16- �: Evaluation for 410gency Use Only 16. Utilities Circle p utilities c one O• ntly avai able at the site: •• at- refuse service sanitar ptic sys em, o er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 'Natural Gas: Washington Natural (;as TP1 phnnP• (,,E Water: City of Tukwila F1Pctririty. Puget Power Storm Sewer: City of Tukwila' Sanitary Sewer: City of Tukwila C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- �� � • 1118410• LOLiTi�O flJCTUO f0 01 000040•.90 AE1I©V goo AHD UaM �GQ OMEN A9 WA, 1-11-1A[1 PARK W-E0T n .0 O l -- - --1.1r-d01 PROPOSED RETAIL SPACE #1 010.0 FLOOR SI,. r .91ld1HC L a. r 1004. 11x0 10 swats. 1100 000.1 0200 0101 PROPOSED SITE PLAN •CALL 1 • • .•-•• •1110 104 -11-00 J_ J 154My9Rn•a .90 w10f1.1clia .041100 116«0010 a .9ar 101/7110 1,1000 TO K OOwRlW10 ;WPM= [+0110•0 07100441.1 «1000110 L.0109 pool lara•1a .921+X7.9 mamma LoapW oafs maaLllLifo «00410104 1.1010•10 pwnu 00•0200 C411010•10 01/01.911 0120407.9 0[0401 401.9MT PROJECT DATA 0.04011001 Magna. .1aWfa 004700: a 10o•NI4AL .Mil •771 01001 •47.716.7 r 10.00 K.9S 1201 Of W: Y4KY/ 008411CIAL w ar. r STORM. 04 1.1002•4.00• C0 .910071104 1770 s oot0 000 17.9 III 0 •0100.60110 O 17101.9 MOUE 0.104 -a ..10. r TOTAL: 06 P a1UW .0000.90 100.0 N.A. 004 0. r 0 0.1/1000 •• •00 10410 TOTAL: 000 11=04, mod. 000+704 17440+00 0. 0•011•1 COOK. 70 0'06•1 MYOICM • TOfW 10110010 000Kf0100v1p0 6176 wawa.: •▪ 7• LMO.CY• ••0110. .• 9.601 1•04 0. 000 7400 0.4101*,• 0007010 {1 000 r LAC AL. Df g,©ROPTOOfr� Ttaa 2 at Mm., NO/101 Park NO. Jos P1 944 ,0+040.0 n 0040+ 0601 RW. pap• 26. /word* 0114np Cowl; CJIL.2 0 TIW •pon�on 04 •rd W. H. 0.0404,2 Daemon Clap NO 00. 0••04000 r 10 071. B.p.0nng 1 • pawl an 0• sown 444 01 ON lame/ G7 al Sodas r sad p*r• Corp 1U] 7 NM.. 1069'02 -W of Me wow common 4Swwn. 23. 24.25 .r0:0.:he00• N0'12 09 'W. 700 Mat 40..0 W49'40 WI 0400 1.1. Penn S2 2 09'E 70 0 1.1 b • pow on sad 4o en . S•c00n ••e' Nice N09 001030 along sad common on 10 000 0 1•0 40 0• P01441 Of BEGINNING EXCEPT 01. .00077 701.1 la W1; TM• I par.. 14 •• ••0122.+0 Span , 01 tti 0470.4 t a.n.e a S.dra 26. T01nNp a Noon. Poop* 4 East. WY. 0aseaDed w wawa: 13•pm000 0 111 ,•,2 ,27444 comfy 1 sad ...001 guano 01 01 0,20•06 0.+71 sad Cant pang 1133 7 1001 NO9'40 2419 04 00 Soden corn./ women lo Swoons 23.24. 23. and 26. Own. 509'00201 01n0 01 •/1. 107..0.10 501.001 27 044 26. 010 0 NW. Mama 51/12 011 12+0111 P0•0.•1419'40 3430 400 0 NW. Memo 00'4209 -W 12001.10 N• P0041 Of OEGJINwG. EXCEPT 04 .•sl•m9 701.1 loo w .1. 0 D©O HOTY NAP ,,lSi•} -\ 7,x"1 • •Ti y .,i9y {{•ii'Fij II : 10. E'�L. RENT N' ni TI C 0.77 w+ -u 4.o 0..0 .fro lZ. +O6 w 41004 Ha• 1