Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-40-91 - TCI CABLEVISION - DUWAMISH RIVER CROSSINGDUWAMISH RIVER CROSSING EXTENSION OF FIBER OPTIC FOR TCI CABLEVISION MILITARY RD & S. 135T" TO EAST MARGINAL WAY & INTERURBN AVE. S. EPIC 40 -91 1 MrSir "rrrrinnv.4.wwv':' ..w:w:w:r ... iww .:w:r:..tv..:viwiwN.wiww:.:.:. iiw::.».i .vn::ii rw :.:. wnvwu. :nvww: w-:. iww:. xv. w: w,is4iewwrz. iiiiii:. iwwrr1LNii; 4iL. 4ww. F: vGiiil Mrw fwiili:ri %Vi:4'f:R{Lw.f /.GKG(Ib DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITYAF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF WMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FAX NUMBER: (206) 431 -3665 TO: DATE: 0 CMVO (MVO ko iqq TITLE: FROM: SALIA CO • • TITLE: DEPARTME 1 T: DEPARTMENT: DGD -{7 FAX NO. ?5L— 100(0 NUMBER OF PAGES SENT BY TRANSMITTED, INCL. (INITIALS): THIS COVER SHEET: Zen •• ................. :r.rw.ir.- .vi /.riii..... W.iii..Jrrmm: i:wii4ii,:vmG;;;;.. riWir E.Z. .... rri.K•.0.rrrvr:v % 0.4.7, w.W.,..w iiJiiiCtivirr /.ivnwv%7W/. �GtZitiWi :4nALii4lAi:•irirriiiiiiGriiil ii: it ii iwii .vrii: iiiii r:riiriir :i l:ri rrJ ":ii: rrv:.n- '•r r +' "' '" IF THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT I � 70 CLEARLY RECEIVED, PLEASE CALL: ' Office: (206) 431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 06/15/90 AFFitAVTT OF OrSTIIUTION SYLVIA A. OSBY. hereby declare that: 0 Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet XOX X Determination of Nonsignificance (] Mitigated Determination of Non - significance 0 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Q Official Notice O Notice of Application for 0 Other Shoreline Management Permit C1 Shoreline Management Permit 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on October 16, 1991 , 19. . ✓ Fa,��d 4-0 vD iI ✓ M4lEd Doe 1016 -q1 �pP MINIM Name of Project DUWAMISH RIVER CROSSING File Number EPIC -40 -91 S'idflature WAC 197- 11 -97d DETERMINATION OF NOOSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Extention of fiber optic cable. Proponent TCI Cablevision of Washington. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any See Exhibit A attached. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -40 -91 - The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.03Q(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. ox There is no comment period for this DNS Q This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tuk„Aga .- A 98188 Date ��. / /P/ Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Nall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 FM.DNS EPIC -40 -91 Duwamish River Crossing EXHIBIT A The proposal is for the maintenance and upgrade of TCI's telecommunications infrastructure. Improvements include attaching a 4 -inch cable to an existing utility pole located on the northeast corner of Military Road and S. 135th. From Military Road and S. 135th it will run east along S. 135th to 37th. On 37th the cable will run north to 130th, east on 130th to E. Marginal Way where it will follow the road path to Interurban Avenue S. On interurban Avenue S. the cable will run southeast to an existing utility pole located on the north side of Interurban Avenue S. approximately 75 feet west of 56th Avenue S. The cable will run east to the 56th Avenue S. bridge. The cable will be attached to an existing utility pole on the south side of the 56th Avenue S. bridge where it will cross aerially to an existing utility pole located Dn the north side of the bridge. The cable will extend aerially for the entire length of the project. Vicinity Map TG 1 I L'L/L' Duwamish re• at S S 113 S = u tr. S 1 ce 5 116 Si auace 5t S 1t9 1 S Juniper S: 12000 S PROJECT ROUTE ey J 128 DS S13 -. v • Go /��G 1S 142 St Shoorauer • Not to Scale Purpose of Checklist: • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS I 01 to A / The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. OCT 031991 PLANNING DEPT. • • ; A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Duwamish River Crossing 2. Name of applicant: TCI Cablevision of Washington 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: North Seattle Office 1140 N. 94th Street Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 624 -1340 Contact Person: Chris Bowen 4. Date checklist prepared: July 18, 1991; Revised October 6, 1991 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 1 1 10CT081991 CiPr" U�:,NILA PLANNING DEPT. The project would commence upon permit approval and continue for approximately five working days. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Once the conduit is in place it would be possible and likely that additional cable could be accommodated by it at a later date. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 2 • • None. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for the maintenance and upgrade of TCI's telecommunications infrastructure. Improvements include attaching a 4 -inch cable to an existing utility pole located on the northeast corner of Military Road and S. 135th. From Military Road and S. 135 it will run east along S. 135th to 37th. On 37th the cable will run north to 130th, east on 130th to E. Marginal Way where it will follow the road path to Interurban Avenue S. On Interurban Avenue S. the cable will run southeast to an existing utility pole located on the north side of Interurban Avenue S. approximately 75 feet west of 56th Avenue S. The cable will run east to the 56th Avenue S. bridge. The cable will be attached to an existing utility pole on the south side of the 56th Avenue S. bridge where it will cross aerially to an existing utility pole located on the north side of the bridge. The cable will extend aerially for the entire length of the project. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached Site Map and Legal Description. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, it is within the Duwamish River Shoreline. 3 OCT 081991 CI (Y Or i uivNILA PLANNING DEPT. • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Not Applicable. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The site is not included in the King County Soil Survey. Urban land is situated adjacent to the site. Site investigation indicates that soils are likely gravelly, silty sands. Generally, the sides of the river have been rip- rapped during bridge construction. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None. 4 OCT h- .rn 0 E 1991 MY Or i U.6IVILA PLANNING DEPT. • • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be temporary emissions associated with installation equipment. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Equipment used during installation will be properly muffled and maintained. OCT 0 8 1991 C9TY OF 'TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. • • 3. WATER a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Duwamish River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The cable will be attached to a utility pole on either side of the Duwamish River. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill material will be placed in the Duwamish River. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. The elevation of the 100 -year floodplain is 15.5 feet. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. There will be no exportation of earth. 6 • b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. None. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None. 7 fl OCT 081991� yr TUMNILA F°i. AWING DEPT. • • 4.PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: Cottonwood X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: Ti other types of vegetation: himalayan blackberry, reed canary grass, and willows b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No endangered or threatened plant species are known to inhabit the project area. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crow mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: X fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: 8 OCT 0 8 1991 c CITY OF TuroVILA PLANNING DEPT. • • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No endangered or threatened animal species are known to inhabit the project area. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, the entire Pacific Coast is a migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No large trees will be removed and no construction would occur within the waters of the Duwamish River. By utilizing existing transportation corridors, the project will not create any new obstacles for regional wildlife movement. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 9 • • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary truck noise associated with the installation of the cable. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: All work will take place during normal business hours. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? River crossing. Adjacent properties along the project path include a mix of low and high density residential, commercial, public facilities, parks and open space and light industrial areas. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 56th Avenue South Bridge, Interstate 5, Interurban Avenue South, State Route 99 and East Marginal Way. Some park benches and a river overlook are situated on the intersection of 56th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue (West Valley Highway). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. 10 1111--:),M1_,MTAM OCT 081991 CITY Cr TUkvVILA PLANNING DEPT. • • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? On the north side of S. 135 street, Single - Family Residential 7200 square feet (R- 1 -7.2) On the west side of 37th Avenue S. , High Density Multi - Family, (RMH); Single Family Residential, (R- 1 -7.2); Light Industrial, (M -1); Regional Retail, (C -2). Along the north side of S. 130th Street, Single - Family Residential, (R- 1 -7.2). On the north side of S. 133rd, Neighborhood Retail, (C -1); Single - Family Residential, (R- 1 -7.2); Light Industrial, (M-1). On the east side of Interurban Avenue, Light Industrial, (M -1); Regional Retail, (C -2). On the east side of the river (across 56th Avenue Bridge), Single Family Residential 7200 square feet (R- 1.7.2). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? River crossing. Adjacent properties along the project path include a mix of low and high density residential, commercial, public facilities, parks and open space and light industrial areas. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The Duwamish River is a "Shoreline of State -wide Significance" according to Washington State's Shoreline Management Act of 1971. The west side of S. 37th has a two sections classified as sensitive slopes, one being a Class two and the other being a Class three. South 133rd as a section classified as a Class two sensitive slope. Work will not impact sensitive areas. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. 11 11'11 [1, NI OCT 0 8 1991 CITY OF TU(WILAA PLANNING DEPT. • • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? None. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. 12 OCT 081991 CITY OF TUKvVILA PLANNING DEPT. • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. The project consists of attaching to an existing cable. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Golf Course, Foster Park, Ft. Dent Park and Earlington Park. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13 OCT 081991 CITY OF TUacVVILA PLANNING DEPT. • • 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Please see description of proposal, question 11 on page 3. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? South 135th and 37th are serviced by Metro buses 174 and 184 at the intersection of 37th and SR 99. South 130th is serviced by buses 124 and 246 at stops along S. 130th. South 133rd is serviced by buses 124, 34 and 154 at stops along S. 133rd. Buses 150, 154, 158, 159 160 and 163 service many transit stops along Interurban Avenue South. There are no stops along 56th Avenue S. the nearest one is located at a park and ride lot and transit stop on the corner of Interurban Avenue S. and 52nd Avenue S. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. 14 OCT 081991 CITY OF TuKvviLA LAN \UNG DEPT. • • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Proponent will notify the City of Tukwila on the date improvements is scheduled to begin. All work will be conducted between normal business hours. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Fiber optic communications cable. TCI Cablevision of Washington. See question 11 for description of construction activities. 15 ' NI`a.1-',1_10R1 OCT 0;1991 CITY OF. TUKYVILA PLANNING DEPT. • • C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: nyg.i.skj, a&rd(itA ice. 16 \--01,-6(q-\. ,.}-, 1 B li_OCT 0 81991 CITY- a' TU&vVILA PLANNING DEPT. August 13, 1991 File No. 599 -0601 • PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION The following description identifies the proposed alignment for a fiber optic cable to be installed in City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington. Within the right -of -way of the following described city streets. Commencing at the City of Tukwila city limits, at the intersection of State Route 99 and 37th Avenue South; Thence Northly along 37th Avenue South to the intersection with South 130th Street; Thence Eastly along South 130th Street to the intersection with East Marginal Way; Thence South Eastly along East Marginal Way to the intersection with Interurban Avenue South; Thence South Eastly along Interurban Ave. South to the intersection with 56th Avenue South; Thence North Eastly along 56th Avenue South to the intersection with South 129th Street, being the termination of this description. rarM[SIM [OCT.081991 CITY of TuicvviLA PLANNING DEPT. MI PACIFIC 3025 -112th Avenue N.E. P.O. Box C -97304 Bellevue, WA 98009 -9304 Creative Solutions ... Superior Service (206) 827-0220 Fax (206) 822 -5341 • Planning • Engineering • • Surveying • Landscape Design • Environmental Services IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII" 111111116111111111111101111 11MM oiiiiIii!kiii:Iii1iiiii 11 --4--,-- -- r. Ilk, I- 11j1j11j1J.j11j , . I Hu �■ 1r ! • GiTi'ii i '■.�' i�■ / �� : , ! ! s� fi1 : ' r r • IIiIii1IiiIIiiiIiIi I" 'In -� r ■ ! r iir!Iwi it _5 { - _ �. - IIiIIiIIIIi - r p impiregi.,....,_ i __ . _,_. __._ _ . , __ __ ._ 4_ , ----f- 0'0 .71MW.00,-....4.,4,111111•11rAMOMIIIIII, -_ ; ____ { Lull AMP MO /AMOI,MMILOMMI,0011”1,1 Mr la I all& dal r 1 ice 111111P!IiIIiiII:Nh ■■■ ■■■ II'IIIi#iIIiiIIiiIi'I' unnonommo muunorr ppuirrinus ■ IhiiE1IiOHEi:IIHIE ■■ ■�■■�■ ■■ •■ m nu u ■/�m mow pumas ■ ■/�■■ ■... ■ mini } . ■ ? 1 t r i {- -. _. ■ ■ ■H■m/ n ? ! Po . - d ^ 1 /■ J'iiiii. !I111I1LU NI lilligli___ C 1 �. , III • iiiiiiilliii Im ail II 0��6 • _ t _ '4. ' - — _ _� • • El a 9 r . . 4 _ . ■■ E 1 ._ t o i r _ 4-, f _ _ 1 ...5F—b4. �. ■ ■ _ _ 1 _. - t _� 4,- - l_. e ! :199 4_,. ' � ► _ VI. t 11t 11 _– _ _ 1 ! ... � 11 — j 1111 mull Pro ect: Date: Prepared by: Checked by: Sheet No. of Job No: Vicinity Map TCt \\ 1'VUJ Duwamish S113Set S1 > cn 5 116St 5 116 >e St< n 'r N 2Q St , 121 St Wa„ace$t S fig $ S Jumper St -01 t! PROJECT ROUTE t • s ii• ow Ilei OCT Nift-Nel 0g1991 c;i e rt 142 St Fid • C a • ILJ[` Not to Scale ij • IPpCIFIC TO: FROM: DATE: • • M E M O R A N D U M Kim Hart, Finance Department Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner October 2, 1991 SUBJECT: Refund for Shoreline Management Permit No.91- 09 -SMP (TCI Cablevision) Per your request, the following information is provided for a refund in the amount of $225.00: Cash Receipt No.: Cash Receipt Date: Account Number: Reason: 1294 August 13, 1991 322.100 The City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan exempts development projects where the total cost is less than $1,000. The project had been revised which reduced the overall cost for development within the shoreline to a maximum of $500. The refund amount is based on the amount of review time spent by staff and the mailing of the Notice of Application (the Shoreline Management Permit fee is $550). The refund should be sent to: Chris Bowen TCI Cablevision of Washington 114 N. 94th Street Seattle, WA 98103 cc:01- 09 -SMP File EPIC -40 -91 File CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD. TUKWILA. WASHINGTON 98188 September 17, 1991 Walt Huff TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. 1215 4th Avenue, Suite 1500 Seattle, WA 9816 PHONE # 12061433.1800 Gans 1. VonDuccn. Alarm RE: TCI Aerial Fiber Optic Cable, 56th Avenue South - South 135th Street - 37th Avenue South - South 130th Street, East Marginal Way, Agreement to Participate in Future Undergrounding Costs for Trenching and Restoration Work (UPA No. 9105 -15) Dear Mr. Huff: In accordance with your previous discussions with the Tukwila City Engineer, with modifications to the existing utility undergrounding ordinance and with your letter to Ron Cameron, dated 9/17/91, subject: Agreement to Pay Future Underground Costs, the referenced Utility Permit Application is hereby approved. The enclosed permit applies to the locations as described above and requires participation in future undergrounding costs for any or all utility segments hereby installed, replaced or upgraded. Please be aware that this approval authorizes activity within the Duwamish shoreline area since Chris Bowen of your office has estimated the value of this work to be under . 300.00. That being the case, our Planning Division has indicated that the work will not require a shoreline permit. The enclosed permit does not authorize the installation of new utility poles as part of your proposal. If you have any questions, please call me at 433 -0179. Sincerely, John A. P -og, P.E. Associat= ngineer Public Works Department Enclosure: Approved permit xc: Greg Villanueva, City Inspector (w /copy of permit) Denni Shefrin, Planning Read File Infrastructure File: • UTILITY PERMIT APPLICATION TCI #9105 -15 Permit Number: Utility and Address: TCI Cablevision of WA, Inc. 1215 4th Ave. Suite 1500 Seattle, WA 98161 Applicant: Chris Bowen Telephone: 624 -2746 Application is hereby made by the above referenced utility to the municipality of the City of Tukwila to perform work as noted below or as shown on attached drawing(s): This permit is for road use only to allow TCI to install a new Fiber Optic Cable aerial through the city of Tukwila by means of overlash to existing TCI Cable. Traffic control per M.U.T.C.D. Site Drawing Attached W o l - L r v o t v E D . 5 G ,qvAr. Sl SI3S t o J 37 4 VE. S� S /3o — .sT, .44/4 .679$T /7> /NA.L 1-2/4Y. Sile9/fEI✓N4- h4=24"A" yy /GL A/07- R 41 //eI .�71/Y /R0A*V. NTq.C. C4. 9/444/C. S /n/E v.942/C /S •ASS 77114/✓ 4.300. o0 . This permit is valid for 60 calendar days from Issuance of Permit The applicant shall comply with all State and local laws or ordinances. The applicant shall save the City harmless from any and all damages which may accrue to any person or property because of this installation or the maintenance thereof. Work performed under this permit shall include: 1. 24 hours prior to construction the contractor shall notify the City Inspector, Greg Villanueva at 433 -0179 2. Prior to construction all utilities in the vicinity shall be field located. NOTE: For City of Tukwila utility locates call One -Call 1- 800 -555 17212. -021t-53-55: 3. Detours within the public right -of -way shall be in accordance with the current edition of the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4. For work within public street - no open cut allowed unless specifically approved. P.exvvv..9I 5. Utility contractor shall carry $1,000,000 liability (Perse.ei injury, property damage) minimum and be licensed in the State of Washington to carry -out this kind of work. CITY OF TUKWILA Approved by: Title: Assc�.4TF tis-Y.✓��.e Date Approved: 11/89 _775)/ • T/ . f4 T,Plivti 4,- • • • • • :Seattle Office • 15241 Pacific Highway south.. • ,.• : • ., Seattle, Washington 98186 • (206) 433-3434 , • ' • `7' ,rr"."Il• -h• r • 1, • r, TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. . Ron Cameron,- . - City Engineer • • OFeTtIKWILA 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98188. (i4., T— ';-:V 4'1 1 ) kA• ' ti- September 17, 1991 Re: Agreement to Pay Future Underground ,Costs..,_ . Dear Ron: - - ,. • , . e. .. TCI Cableiiision of WaShington. Inc. ('TC1°) hereby agrees to comply with Tukwila City Ordinanee 1321, Section V, Paragraph e) and accepts .the permit issued this date.by the City of Tukwila authorizing TCI to inetal1 a new aerial fiber optic cable by the process of overlashing the new cable to existing •TC1 owned coaxial cables, as shown in TCA's application #9105•15, attached hereto'and made a part of this agreement. TCI specillically agrees that in the event the City of Tukwila re- . quires all overhead utilities along any portion of the route of the new fiber cable underground, that TCI shall pay the Cite:i a proportionate share of the City's cost to construct nnd restore the trench, based upon the number of utilities occupying the trench; and •CT shall also pay all costs associated with removing TCT's nerial facilities and placing them in the trench. The City shall provide TCI a minimum of one (1) year advance notice of a requirement to underground its facilities along said route. * Sincerely, Wait Huff / Liaison-Joint Use & Right of Way 1215 - 4th Avenue, Suite 1500 Seattle, Wa. 98161 (206)624-1340 FAX 624-7129 cc: Chip White Jeff Roe ICY 1, Equal Opportunity Employer - • • TO: Jack Pace FROM: Denni Shefrin DATE: September 6, 1991 SUBJECT: TCI Cablevision Based upon the Utility Committee's recommendation, City Council will consider amending the Underground Ordinance (TMC 13.08.010 & 13.08.050) on September 16th. The ordinance currently requires that new facilities be installed underground at the utility's expense. Additionally, the ordinance requires undergrounding within 60 months from the effective date of the ordinance. In addition to TCI, USWest and City Light have requested approval to install new lines. The Public Works division initiated recommended changes to process utility permits more effectively for the City and the individual utilities, and to reduce the cost to each utility. Revisions include the ability to authorize an agreement for future undergrounding and porportional cost to each of the utilities at the time bonds are collected from each utility. The utilities would pay 1/3 of the underground trenching costs and respective undergrounding costs when the City begins to underground along a particular street (see issue paper and memo dated August 14, 1991 from John Pierog attached). In discussions with John Pierog, the applicant has asked that the applications (SEPA and the utility permit) be placed on hold until Council has reached a decision. If Council approves the proposed change, would the SEPA determination need to address those areas outside of the shorelines boundary? Above ground (overlashing) would not alter the topography and would not pose a negative environmental impact. Do you concur? attachments. CITY OF T ILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 • MEMORANDUM TO: ,.t7 sw/ SyEFR/N DG,U FROM ✓D,//.✓ A.P/ERog/ PM) DATE' SUBJECT: TeX U/✓4r.P��iar,.t/D F is Pd4ey�.✓7- •1 SEP061991 L i i t ur i uhvvILA PI ANNINn t)FPT Z- G'AL1.E-D C//.Prs d8h/ CO_NOEAWirt/4 TZ,,E de_E -A P,ci►/r. 1 ? /LJ_7"Y f01PD✓E //7/7E0 /47Z'Ly • pia: /yY G�L.1. 70?D.4X_ TD4D 1,//A1 AVE' A/ 1D & ER_ /1/U,7ERn,/ f sF VrJ77VE ARFf2S (S^TE P .SLDR "Igi /AGENT 725 TZS/E P�2iaG2SED ieete■ OPT /c. 444147. _7 //1/4/e--47E-.6 7/47 //c- G_✓W PLACED �iY /T1S/ //✓ 7'E r1J '4D N/F7J4.412- .yEQTi(/E 1/Yi,GC?S .9VDV /Gf E7) TAU 7 A .0:PzAPP�4i.49.' �Jeez.r/DN ,14" /??P1E7102V"rED X/I ..P /■r CON Sli4//r72 J ewe/s- / ' 'Z 4 4O 77v 47 IV AS !OzzY '70 » -4/T AND AvNAT 7:406 .PES 'z.7S OF 7-446- .043P6PO544. 71) E.1,YDER`•PN41/1J /A,0* DRO/A40/1/4E UT/,G/T/E5 GVVC1/// 77FE APPIQ4'YED AN AC7-4'4' 7D /7DO /fy T// / t 4' AsvD .DRh'.ORO 77/F /e .QFCD/`1/7ENp4774N 7b ?WE 477/ CQ'/NG /.L /?1/P ,c7A/4 ,.AC7%0N 04/ /4 /991. i47TAGd4' .q.PE 7.1/E ,L-011- Glv/ /. /c7 e77NENT 40oc1-17.417--s'. ' /. /fc..»o f,-ern ,/. /ct ero1q tf'o "7Fi�ascr, u/0,Zc4/ A�.9vsI, /49// ,S66jcc-2�•' !/e,,o ryrrri/ao/ !'z , /,G//Y ..Til,-.40 / /dLtid, .�/! q✓ 2. A'IiEND4 lee- 3 /99/ w/a ac/,cPi 2s-i. e%cle.ve77c.,t. .21: /914 7X/ /S CG40P/• - /ES 7-A/- cci', 7V7 ST4T!/S DF. T.4'4$ UTi< /Ty #7PaPa -4L. ,e-0/1 Yoe! iec . ' Z4/#77PASTR//GTRC F /LF , 47QD o'/cE AGENDA UTILITIES COMMITTEE Tuesday, September 3, 1991 Time: 5:45 p.m. Place: Public Works Conference Room ITEM: ACTION TO BE TAKEN: 1. Modify Underground Ordinance (TMC 13.08) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report 1. Discussion and forward to council with recommended action. NEXT MEETING: September 16, 1991 FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: 1. 1991 CIP Utilities Program 2. Comprehensive Drainage Plan 3. Storm Drainage Ordinance 4. Comprehensive Water /Sewer Plan ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AUG 2) 0 1991 ��'S� } Purpose of Checklist: SR•S 44-4-e c4.12.,c S C-13441/ The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. i • • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Duwamish River Crossing 2. Name of applicant: TCI Cablevision of Washington 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: North Seattle Office 1140 N. 94th Street Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 624 -1340 Contact Person: Chris Bowen 4. Date checklist prepared: July 18, 1991; Revision to include sensitive areas: August 30, 1991 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The project would commence upon permit approval and continue for approximately two weeks. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Once the conduit is in place it would be possible and likely that additional cable could be accommodated by it at a later date. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 2 • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Hydraulic Project Approval Permit - Department of Fisheries Substantial Shoreline Development Permit - City of Tukwila Right -of -way Across State -Owned Aquatic Lands - Department of Natural Resources 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for the maintenance and upgrade of TCI's telecommunications infrastructure. Improvements would require extending a buried 4 -inch conduit from an existing utility pole located on the northeast corner of Military Road and S. 135th. The conduit would run east along S. 135th to 37th. On 37th the conduit would run north to 130th, east on 130th to E. Marginal Way where it would follow the road to Interurban Avenue S. On Interurban Avenue S. the conduit would run southeast to an existing utility pole located on the north side of Interurban Avenue S. approximately 75 feet west of 56th Avenue S. The conduit would run east to the 56th Avenue S. bridge where it would be attached to the underside of the bridge to cross the Duwamish River. On the north side of the river, the conduit would again be buried and run north for approximately 130 feet where it would be attached to an existing utility pole. To bury the conduit, a trench 12 inches wide and four feet deep would be excavated and backfilled with excavated material. The area excavated would be allowed to revegetate naturally with native species. All development would occur within the developed right -of -way. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached Site Map and Legal Description. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, it is within the Duwamish River. Shoreline. On 37th Avenue S. there is one section designated as Class two and another as Class three sensitive areas slopes. On S. 133rd there is a section designated as a Class two sensitive area slope. 3 • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The east side of the river is flat to gently rolling. The west side of the slope that comes off of West Valley Highway is fairly steep approximately 3:1. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The site is not included in the King County Soil Survey. Urban land is situated adjacent to the site. Site investigation indicates that soils are likely gravelly, silty sands. Generally, the sides of the river have been rip- rapped during bridge construction. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The fiber optic conduit would be buried three feet along the developed right -of- way for streets and two feet for sidewalks to guard against disturbance. Excavation of a 12 -inch wide and four foot deep trench would be necessary. All excavated material would be replaced once the conduit was in place. Existing topographic contours would be maintained. The approximate amount of cut and fill would be 2,780 cubic yards. • • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. The 56th Avenue S. bridge extends beyond the slope on the west side of the river. Since the conduit would be attached to the bridge, it would not pose an erosion hazard. No erosion would occur from construction activities. All construction along the proposed path would occur in the developed right -of- way. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. A backhoe with rubber tires and a 12 inch bucket will be used for construction. All native material will be used as backfill and compacted back into the natural environment. No exportation of earth will occur. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There would be temporary emissions associated with construction equipment used to dig trenches necessary for the conduit. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Equipment used during excavation would be properly muffled and maintained. 5 • • 3. WATER a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Duwamish River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Conduit would be attached to the underside of the 56th Avenue S. bridge which spans the Duwamish River. Please see attached plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill material would be placed in the Duwamish River. All native material will be used as backfill. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. The elevation of the 100 -year floodplain is 15.5 feet. The road grade for 56th Avenue S. is well above this elevation and all trenching would be done within the street right -of -way. Plan sheet 2 of 2 shows a cross section of the river and the proposed alignment of the conduit in relation to the 100 -year floodplain. According to King County Sensitive Areas Map Folio no areas of the proposal lie within the 100 -year, floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. There will be no exportation of earth. 6 • • b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. None. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None. • • 4.PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other :, Cottonwood X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs X grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: X other types of vegetation: himalayan blackberry, reed canary grass, and willows b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? An understory of blackberry exists. A 3- to 4-foot wide swath of this shrub along with associated herbaceous species would be removed to bury the proposed conduit. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No endangered or threatened plant species are known to inhabit the project area. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Large trees and their root zones would be avoided and not impacted by the conduit. Shrubs such as blackberry would naturally recolonize the affected area. Proponent will hydroseed all disturbed areas. Reseeding or the placement of new sod could also occur in impacted areas. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crow mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: X fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: s • • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No endangered or threatened animal species are known to inhabit the project area. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, in as much as the entire Pacific Coast is a migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No large trees would be removed and no construction would occur within the waters of the Duwamish River. By utilizing existing transportation corridors, the project would not create any new obstacles for regional wildlife movement. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. The conduit would be buried. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 9 • • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary construction machinery noise associated with the installation of the conduit. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: All work would take place between 10 am to 3 pm. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? River crossing. Adjacent properties along the project path include a mix of low and high density residential, commercial, public facilities, parks and open space and light industrial areas. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 56th Avenue South Bridge, Interstate 5, Interurban Avenue South, State Route 99 and East Marginal Way. Some park benches and a river overlook are situated on the intersection of 56th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue (West Valley Highway). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. 10 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? On the north side of S. 135 street, Single - Family Residential 7200 square feet (R- 1 -7.2) On the west side of 37th Avenue S. , High Density Multi - Family, (RMH); Single Family Residential, (R- 1 -7.2); Light Industrial, (M -1); Regional Retail, (C -2). Along the north side of S. 130th Street, Single - Family Residential, (R- 1 -7.2). On the north side of S. 133rd, Neighborhood Retail, (C -1); Single - Family Residential, (R- 1 -7.2); Light Industrial, (M-1). On the east side of Interurban Avenue, Light Industrial, (M -1); Regional Retail, (C -2). On the east side of the river (across 56th Avenue Bridge), Single Family Residential 7200 square feet (R- 1.7.2). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? River crossing. Adjacent properties along the project path include a mix of low and high density residential, commercial, public facilities, parks and open space and light industrial areas. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The Duwamish River is a "Shoreline of State -wide Significance" according to Washington State's Shoreline Management Act of 1971. The west side of S. 37th has a two sections classified as sensitive slopes, one being a Class two and the other being a Class three. South 133rd as a section classified as a Class two sensitive slope. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. 11 • • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: All development within sensitive areas would be conducted in the developed right -of -way. All excavated material will be replaced not exported. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Existing rights -of -way would be utilized wherever possible. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Conduit would be buried or attached to the underside of the bridge and would not be visible. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views from park benches and river overlook would be temporarily impacted until the trenched area revegetates itself 12 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Conduit would be buried and construction impacts would be minimized by using light equipment. A bucket no greater than 12 inches would be used to dig the required trench. Hydroseeding or sodding will be used in disturbed areas. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Golf Course, Foster Park, Ft. Dent Park and Earlington Park. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Yes, views from park benches and river overlook would be temporarily impacted until the trenched area revegetates itself. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Re- seeding or sodding will occur in disturbed areas. 13 • • 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Please see description of proposal, question 11 on page 3. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? South 135th and 37th are serviced by Metro buses 174 and 184 at the intersection of 37th and SR 99. South 130th is serviced by buses 124 and 246 at stops along S. 130th. South 133rd is serviced by buses 124, 34 and 154 at stops along S. 133rd. Buses 150, 154, 158, 159 160 and 163 service many transit stops along Interurban Avenue South. There are no stops along 56th Avenue S. the nearest one is located at a park and ride lot and transit stop on the corner of Interurban Avenue S. and 52nd Avenue S. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. 14 • • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Duwamish River. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Proponent is submitting a schedule of improvements and will coordinate with the City of Tukwila Public Works Department on a traffic control plan. All work will be conducted between the hours of 10 am to 3 pm. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Does not apply. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Fiber optic communications cable. TCI Cablevision of Washington. See question 11 for description of construction activities. 15 • • C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: tput,t4')514,e0 1)1- AAA mutt, t ./1/10)0 Kin* I L65- Date Submitted: 27P AD-ba-A- 19m 16 • • • Issue: Undergrounding Ordinance Description of issue /incident: Date: August 28, 1991 TMC Section 13.08.010 & 13.08.050 requires new facilities to be installed underground at the utility's expense. TCI cable is in- stalling a new fiber optic line from Burien to Issaquah that passes through Tukwila. TCI's cost to lash it to the existing overhead line is $8,700 while the underground cost is $242,000. Just TCI's line would be underground, not US West or City Light. Background Discussion TCI, US West, and City Light have requested approval to install new lines (increased capacity). Each would be required to under- ground their line, not the other lines. Currently, there are three options: place the facility underground, apply for a vari- ance, or not install the new facility. US West plans a new E Marginal fiberoptic line by lashing to overhead existing - cable. US West is pursueing a variance. City Light has a similar issue of installing higher voltage lines which has been interpreted as new facility (increased capacity). City Light Attorneys view the TMC undergrounding requirement as null because it is not in the franchise. Analysis and alternative actions Modify the underground ordinance to authorize an agreement for fu- ture underground cost participation if the City undergrounds that particular street. The agreement would obligate the utility to participate in the costs to underground all the utilities instead of requiring a single utility to underground its line(s). Recommendation Consider and approve an undergrounding ordinance revision provid- ing for an agreement where TCI, US West, and City Light would pay 1/3 of the underground trenching costs and their respective undergrounding costs if the City undergrounds that particular street; this would be alternative to the individual utility being required to underground their lines if they are installing new or increased capacity lines. Impact Analysis Utility Permits would be more effectively processed for the City and the individual utilities. Total undergrounding costs would be less. For the TCI example, costs for US West would likely exceed TCI's $242,000, City Light would be more, and City permitting costs would be more than three times as much for individual projects. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONM( \JTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC: 10 - cf No PROJECT •>,:m.ticti- -iNCY) COMYr/ON)(110`)S ADDRESS E:7,1T1,6101v euNml 1\Y5 F-P6-1 Ib 5P Azokty uwasiti, Seto,&_ DATE TRANSMITTED n DIJ5T RESPONSE REQUESTED BY5Efrr, (ff STAFF COORDINATOR 0,TNTIQ\ GRe__E10) DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED : . • The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project:,. please anc commont below to advise the responible..olficiai regarding the threthold.detarrninatiOni.: enVIrotimental.review file Is available in the Planning Department through the abo'Ve'st.' C oordinator: Comments regarding the . project you to the Plann ind. :CdinisSI Board of Adjustment and City Council should be sul)mated In the comment section belo*.: • • ITEM -a•-.../.4116■10 COMMENT !. • I ! '1 I 611 UG. 2 {3 1991 4 Date: 4 8707 2 7/ /*> Comments prepared by; 09/14101 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Pub Wks •.: ..• PROJECT - /NC:el Car YrON)CA ADDRESS E-Y1-1,61(:)\ IN62245 eUNI\i11.\(-3- b-"6-1 52P e Amo A2o\ty U) 5.A5 DATE TRANSMITTED )9 i.nt)5T- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY-, e.L )1 cr( STAFF COORDINATOR 0- ,N-\\)\ G?-i-eFEJNj DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED ENVIRONIVIC ATAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC: 40 IT) PN D 5IY) P- `11 ITEM . • " COMMENT /1/1/ok 477177/0 /V friftc2,-, .6-Xc.41/.4 7-/c241.5 SA/eW.C.4 "qr,&° e.a/V 7: 1N4.6 ,,e4,-.74EN7z) 7-,e4wsp,04-777) /4/722 4.ezky..vms4' d# sro tORA/At SYs7a7-ts .v r#�..44. f7 72 dR4 .40FWAT ..C.//ae,L ,;%',Elld-aE174 77E1) e/A/774 &If 77 vE F/$ EGEWRAre .1Dos-4v/1/ ca4e-rito4A 146,54FAC A63 REI) 7e,0"-frye... ee-A4rpo.4 "e....47/vs . .esw ..re/6vivi776'2) Z/� C/7/ /f e 7b 7/1/e' /‘1,7e/E/ Cd7/1.1,CAri F ,o/voy kvmeAo, frivaAPA- 47,472c:n7iAl 71e4 dazzikt/ (..Sin# Z47. .G44/ L-,L.e.re./Afr;) -SW/eked;e_so) AfLga-- dVLY 7/FA/ 7X' Aoi//er -/-7. AUG 2 8 1991 ,... • t ; • Date: et/2 I / Comments prepared by: CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT k �9uftdin '0 Planning ENVIRONIW ATAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC: o-' PND SmP -1J PROJECT - t NCB CCr�U-CV Car yroN)c tNs Parl ADDRESS E cN )N -LL& e UNN1N(S DATE TRANSMITTED j \. A DUSr STAFF COORDINATOR NUJ\ GR E' I Q.) T To 510-'11 AN 132. E Amp f\ YJ uNtlaika 1 sPszgLI DUESTED1BYS _,_` ,DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED 9 attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project:-.P ease comrnellt.bolow,to �advise.the.responsible: official regarding the. threshotd'determmation environmental revlew file Is:availablo inthe Planning Department through the above stall coordinator. Comments regarding:the project you wish'. carriedtolhe:PlanningCommissto Board of Adjustment and City Council.should be .submitted in the: comment sectionbe1ov ITEM COMMENT 266,1 to $)to1 . Date: ) c ( Comments prepared by; , 00/14/11$ CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .Planning Q Pub' PROJECT '1' r,1O1-1 ADDRESS E r o N euNMIN(T DATE TRANSMITTED )9 IL) unUS>- STAFF COORDINATOR 0 N \ Cam}-} QNi ENViRONMr `VIAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM EPIC: 4 0 - PAD 5m P- PD � l Fire' CD rfl )N)cs s Parks/ -co 52 h B2A.%e AKIO f+ s umEesi.6 RESPONSE REQUESTED BYS��, � &?JL E DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED e attached environmental checklist was received regarding °this.project Please review`a (5rnrrisnt below.to: advise the.: responsible. official regarding:the threshold `detarmination .""' • environmental;:revlew tiled is available,in the Planning Department.threugh the above staff oordinator, Comments regarding the'project you wish carried.to the Planning Cormmisslor oardof Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in :the comnnent.sectfon below. ITEM O COMMENT 11)I1;P lc ; \ViN jil,E „Lip L. 1 r J AUG 2 i 13911 q -- - I .Lur r- "" A �(.'1NG u: FP t . Date: V 20 9j Comments prepared by: , OWJ14 /Bf Commercial Accounts Unigard Financial Center 1215 4th Ave., Suite 1500 Seattle, WA. 98161 (206) 624 -1340 Fax (206) 624 -7129 August 20, 1991 TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. Denni Shefrin City of Tukwila ,Planning Department 6200 South Center Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Underground fiber optic placement Dear Denni, 1661 0 f Df17 II ill\ In response to our conversation this is a formal request to the City of Tukwila to allow T.C.I. immediate permission to underground that portion of the project that does not conflict with the shoreline permit to attach to the 56th street bridge. Attached you will find a map outlining the portion I am referring to. T.C.I. first started this permit process in the later part of April with an application to overlash fiber to our existing cable facility, a process that would have cost T.C.I. approximately $9000.00, and taken only 3 -4 days. This application was denied and as a result T.C.I. requested a variance to overlash, which was also denied. Since the city of Tukwila has given T.C.I. no other options, T.C.I. has agreed to underground the entire project at a cost of approximately $240,000.00. This project will take approximately 21 to 25 working days, so our time frame has now become critical, therefore I ask that consideration of this request be acted upon as swiftly as possible. Please don't hesitate in contacting me by telephone if I can provide additional information or answer any questions. Sincerely, Chris Bowen Project Engineer CB:jz /(Y ® Equal Opportunity Employer ce ) l 231 •' `ti's �%�� AUG 1 9 1991 Purpose of Checklist: , I / 7 ... leg \L �..�`�` Cur :v`tlILA The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RC , reifial agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Duwamish River Crossing 2. Name of applicant: TCI Cablevision of Washington 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: North Seattle Office 1140 N. 94th Street Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 624 -1340 Contact Person: Chris Bowen te- cheeklist ared: August 16, 1991 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The project would commence upon permit approval and continue for approximately one month. AUG19 1991 CITY Of Tui(vvILA PLANNING DEPT. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Once the conduit is in place it would be possible and likely that additional cable could be accommodated by it at a later date. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 2 • • b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Fiber optic communications cable. TCI Cablevision of Washington. See question 11 for description of construction activities. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: tfrivtA,,42 liAt4 ,� ct &,, ut)Ctdt... -- Al 1 I Cr2. Date Submitted: `io (. 15 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: • EP( 1/0.—q pit,* l2-� 4 fc1.nee1, appluoarvv mod- ) 9 " 5 7 ) 1 c 1 1 p.s. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 1 • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Duwamish River Crossing 2. Name of applicant: TCI Cablevision of Washington 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: North Seattle Office 1140 N. 94th Street Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 624 -1340 Contact Person: Chris Bowen 4. D .:. ti prepared: 5. Age ing checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The project would commence upon permit approval and continue for approximately one month. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Once the conduit is in place it would be possible and likely that additional cable could be accommodated by it at a later date. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 2 • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Hydraulic Project Approval Permit - Department of Fisheries Substantial Shoreline Development Permit - City of Tukwila Right -of -way Across State -Owned Aquatic Lands - Department of Natural Resources 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for the maintenance and upgrade of TCI's telecommunications infrastructure. Improvements would require extending a buried 4 -inch conduit from an existing utility pole located on the north corner of 35th and Pacific Highway S. (Hwy 99). On 35th the conduit would run north to 130th, east on 130th to E. Marginal Way where it would follow the road to Interurban Avenue S. On Interurban Avenue S. the conduit would run southeast to an existing utility pole located on the north side of Interurban Avenue S. approximately 75 feet west of 56th Avenue S. The conduit would run east to the 56th Avenue S. bridge where it would be attached to the underside of the bridge to cross the Duwamish River. On the north side of the river, the conduit would again be buried and run north for approximately 130 feet where it would be attached to an existing utility pole. To bury the conduit, a trench 12 inches wide and four feet deep would be excavated and backfilled with excavated material. The area excavated would be allowed to revegetate naturally with native species. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached Site Map and Legal Description. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, it is within the Duwamish River Shoreline. 3 • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The east side of the river is flat to gently rolling. The west side of the slope that comes off of West Valley Highway is fairly steep approximately 3:1. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The site is not included in the King County Soil Survey. Urban land is situated adjacent to the site. Site investigation indicates that soils are likely gravelly, silty sands. Generally, the sides of the river have been rip- rapped during bridge construction. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The fiber optic conduit would be buried for most of its length to guard against disturbance. Excavation of a 12 -inch wide and four foot deep trench would be necessary. All excavated material would be replaced once the conduit was in place. Existing topographic contours would be maintained. The approximate amount of cut and fill would be 44 cubic yards. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. The 56th Avenue S. bridge extends beyond the slope on the west side of the river. Since the conduit would be attached to the bridge, it would not pose an erosion hazard. 4 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There would be temporary emissions associated with construction equipment used to dig trenches necessary for the conduit. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Equipment used during excavation would be properly muffled and maintained. 3. WATER a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Duwamish River. 5 • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Conduit would be attached to the underside of the 56th Avenue S. bridge which spans the Duwamish River. Please see attached plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill material would be placed in the Duwamish River. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. The elevation of the 100 -year, floodplain is 15.5 feet. The road grade for 56th Avenue S. is well above this elevation and all trenching would be done within the street right -of -way. Plan sheet 2 of 2 shows a cross section of the river and the proposed alignment of the conduit in relation to the 100 -year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. 6 • • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. None. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None. 4.PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: Cottonwood X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pe, other: shrubs X grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: Ti other types of vegetation: himalayan blackberry, reed canary grass, and willows b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? An understory of blackberry exists. A 3- to 4-foot wide swath of this shrub along with associated herbaceous species would be removed to bury the proposed conduit. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No endangered or threatened plant species are known to inhabit the project area. • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Large trees and their root zones would be avoided and not impacted by the conduit. Shrubs such as blackberry would naturally recolonize the affected area. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crow mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: X fish: bass, sahnon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No endangered or threatened animal species are known to inhabit the project area. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, in as much as the entire Pacific Coast is a migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No large trees would be removed and no construction would occur within the waters of the Duwamish River. By utilizing existing transportation corridors, the project would not create any new obstacles for regional wildlife movement. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. The conduit would be buried. 8 • • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary machinery noise associated with the installation of the conduit. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Work would take place during normal business hours (i.e., 6 am to 8 pm). 9 • • 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? River crossing. Adjacent properties are generally residential with increasing industrial development to the north. Foster Golf Course is located to the south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. 56th Avenue South Bridge. Some park benches and a river overlook are situated on the intersection of 56th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue (West Valley Highway). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? On the east side of the river, Single Family Residential 7200 square feet (R- 1.7.2). On the west side of the river, Regional Retail Business (C -2). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Low Density Residential on the east side of the river. Commercial on the west side of the river north of 56th Avenue S. Parks and open space on the west side of the river south of 56th Avenue S. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The Duwamish River is a "Shoreline of State -wide Significance" according to Washington State's Shoreline Management Act of 1971. 10 • • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Existing rights -of -way would be utilized wherever possible. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Conduit would be buried or attached to the underside of the bridge and would not be visible. 11 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views from park benches and river overlook would be temporarily impacted until the trenched area revegetates itself. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Conduit would be buried and construction impacts would be minimized by using light equipment. A bucket no greater than 12 inches would be used to dig the required trench. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster Golf Course and Ft. Dent Park are located to the South. Earlington Park is located to the North. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. 12 • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed conduit would be located parallel to Interurban Avenue S. and would then turn north and run parallel to 56th Avenue S. See attached site plan. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is a park and ride lot and transit stop located on the corner of Interurban Avenue S. and 52nd Avenue S. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. 13 • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Duwamish River. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools; other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Does not apply. 14 • • b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Fiber optic communications cable. TCI Cablevision of Washington. See question 11 for description of construction activities. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: LlAirAivAetALl Date Submitted: 1-72 15 it City of Tukwila PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -0179 Ross A. Earnst, P.E. Director M E M O R A N D U M TO: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer FROM: John Pierog, Associate Engineer DATE: August 14, 1991 SUBJECT: Underground Utility Installation BACKGROUND TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. has recently been advised by the Public Works Department that TCI's plan to replace 9700 feet of existing coaxial aerial trunk cable with a new aerial fiber optic cable has been rejected. Current City ordinance and municipal code require the underground installation of all new electrical and communication facilities with exceptions for certain facilities not located within the public right -of -way, ornamental street lighting, telephone pedestals, police and fire sirens, and traffic control equipment. The ordinance and code also require that existing overhead facilities be relocated underground, as soon as practicable, but not later than sixty (60) months from the effective date of the ordinance; the deadline for which expired some time ago. In residential areas, routine pole replacement and casualty damage repair of overhead facilities are permitted. Since TCI is required by the TMC to underground their new replacement cable, they have expressed their desire to apply for a variance from the undergrounding requirement in accordance with five criteria contained in TMC Section 18.72.020(1) -(5). In addition, in granting a variance, the Tukwila Board of Adjustment must find that undergrounding would work an undue hardship $n any affected parties. Undue hardship is defined as technological difficulty r unusually high cost. TCI has pointed out that overlashing new cable to existing has been approved by King County, Renton and other communities along this particular cable route. TCI has responded to the variance criteria contained in TMC Section 18.72.020(1) -(5) and TCI has additionally provided information which alleges that overhead lashing would cost $8,730 versus $242,500 for cable undergrounding. • • Phil Fraser MEMORANDUM August 14, 1991 Page 2 TMC Section 13.08.050 states that the cost and expense of relocating existing facilities, or installing new facilities underground, shall be borne by the serving utilities; except that costs for disconnections and underground reconnections to utilities from the edge of the public right -of -way to the user's facility shall be borne by the user. TMC Section 13.08.085 further states that in the event the City desires to install any utilities in any City street or way, or make any street improvement, or change the grade of any street or alley, City specifications shall call for the removal of any overhead utilities from the path of such improvements until same is completed and the require undergrounding of replacement facilities. In these situations in the past, the City has typically paid for trenching and restoration costs associated with the utility undergrounding. ANAYLSIS The goals to be achieved are twofold: 1. To facilitate franchise utility replacements and upgrades in a timely manner, and 2. To accomplish undergroundng of utilities with shared, reasonable costs. Franchise utility companies frequently replace sections of overhead electric and communications facilities. The requirement for undergrounding each individual section at the time replacement becomes necessary increases costs substantially for the utility company and inevitably for the user, when compared to the simultaneous undergrounding of all servicing overhead utilities at a specific location. Smaller segments requiring replacement could possibly be combined for a larger project at a future date, thus further reducing costs. All utilities requiring undergrounding would contribute a percentage of the cost for trenching and restoration in a specific area. Percentages would vary according to whether the utility was initiating replacement or upgrading in a specific area or the City was upgrading facilities in the area. For actions initiated by the utility, the following percentages of the cost of trenching and restoration could be used as a guideline for participation and are specified by type of utility: Power - 50% Telephone - 25% Television - 25% (If trenching equals or exceeds 300 lineal feet, restoration costs shall include a full road width pavement overlay.) • • Phil Fraser MEMORANDUM August 14, 1991 Page 3 For actions initiated by the City, the following participating percentages of the cost of trenching and restoration could be used: Power - 20% Telephone - 10% Television - 10% At the time utility franchises propose replacement or rebuilding of existing overhead facilities, such overhead modifications should be allowed provided that the utility post a suitable security for future undergrounding costs. The security should be in an amount based on above percentages of the best estimate, at the time, for trenching and restoration costs along the length of the utility within the public right -of -way. For improvements or upgrades proposed by the City which will require utility undergrounding within public right -of -way, it is proposed that future Franchise Utility Agreements include clauses which would require such utilities to acknowledge participation in trenching and restoration costs in accordance with the above suggested percentages. Such participation would be required at the time of bid opening, since exact costs would be known, and prior to contract award for the specific improvements. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Modification of the City ordinance and the TMC to incorporate the above and elimination of the verbage addressing the require- ment for undergrounding within 60 months of the effective date of the ordinance; since the deadline has lapsed and the requirement has not been enforced. 2. Allow TCI and other utilities proposing overhead facilities replacement to make aerial replacements provided that a security is posted in accordance with the above. 3. Modify Franchise Utility Agreements to include a clause for participation in future City improvement projects which require utility undergrounding. The above recommendations would allow timely replacement of deficient overhead utilities while making provisions for undergrounding and the sharing of more reasonable costs associated with the undergrounding. JP /kjp CITY OF •KWILA • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 MEMORANDUM TO. /oz..oiv/t/i/vq FROM ./e;>1/42/ .q iP/E7PGV f r4S,Ipl/AT.E .oh/!) DATE- / /9/ SUBJECT: TCr z./.1-Ro uNZ) c o8F , ,. PGUE -CT P1-44(S /24/0 A7P.4/✓L6? /sc"" 1.77/ /rY "9PA.G /47/01/ ..c27/e 774/4" .SY/° /E'CT J:/fl./ 027 -4ccoRom/q 77' G?Y .PE so/iR : zA/A- / A4 r /O/t/ T.Sic /°RGZ_/EcT !-'// L - /.f/1//ioGVE- .Z7c11/,,C OA/ Avg; ' 5 z.7w .4A/D 77 S .4�PEAS 4L '4/ 3' .5,2/-/7741, /3D .S?•QEE7' r/�,j;;Y i-1Qi L/i/ fi. 41/AY. S //✓C %N.E- L//k& WAVe_oz/ NQ//✓9 /1/✓D,L t/,ES /`90iP.E 77C/i0// SOO C///1!r Yi4/120 S 14-0 77,0/1/ 14/ : . . Elm x• 1 t N R�"I/ /LAW 7* /.S P.PD✓ 2 r ,q/1/z) AD ✓/SE .4_S 7 STA72/ XC.' .e4".4L' 8/02//9/ De/2 /7 /;. /4s .1 /pre v/our / sLtda. / 071,0 L44%s /0207 /h va //c scams /' ' ✓c. drCdS d� r- e7v /i'tS d•7 �v /rn.9.nc.242 /c4ecv/ /sZ` lec'4; e /s mD/c 24„,.7 SOD cy 01' _ eXCd ✓d / /o/� ems✓ /:z.2inc.7402/ C /e.d o?..2ceS 2f . oZ ✓e ire ca/7 /vcein /L` / *Ye/ //7 ✓D /i/ O!/L"S ■:a4 p 7." %Pe- . • UTILITY PERMIT APPLICATION TCI #9105 -15 Permit Number: Utility and Address: TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. 1215 4th Ave Suite 1500 Seattle, WA 98161 Applicant: Chris Bowen Telephone: 624 -2746 Application is hereby made by the above referenced utility to the municipality of the City of Tukwila to perform work as noted below or as shown on attached drawing(s): Place 4" conduit and trunk fiber in the road right of way on the streets highlighted on attached drawings. This will be a new trunk line to get to our receive site independent of our existing aerial feeder system. Traffic Control per hI.U.T.C.D. This permit is valid for 90 calendar days from Issuance Qf Permit, The applicant shall comply with all State and local laws or ordinances. lfie- applicant shall save the City harmless from any and all damages which may .accrue to any person or property because of this installation or the maintenance thereof. Work performed under this permit shall include: 1. 24 hours prior to construction the contractor shall notify the City Inspector, Greg Villanueva at 433-0179 2. Prior to construction all utilities, in the vicinity shall be field located. NOTE: For City of Tukwila utility locates call One -Call 1 -800- 555 -1212. 3. Detours' within the public right -of -way shall be in accordance with the current edition of the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4. For work within public street - no open cut allowed unless specifically approved. 5. Utility contractor shall carry $1,000,000 liability (Personnel injury, property damage) minimum and be licensed in the State of Washington to carry -out this kind of work. CITY OF TUKWILA Approved by: Title: Date Approved: 11/89 E -I A X T -16' 124 4 380 F r -/6 SP- 17,01 a: 1.2 DR F 55.63 V • 4. •N I �i. 2 5 1991 UK'ii F•. °NITS \ UNDERGROUND • J7. RISER T -2 .4 -/ SP-2 1198 r 253 F. 25.05 V • ../ J'. /4 /JT .T T. NAME DATE REVISION DAT BY TZ1M3. 60., IIA. ---J� —. TRAM BY DESIGNED BY ArVerretD - ,e...64 -71 T -fl it T 1'UNK b.iT_ , . 4 1 -'1 RUNK AMFL. (''1...»"� . , Tg , Q, _LINE' EXTENDER Y CABLE . AGC LINT EWE NAER •' ''B•IVA✓ Set IT TER. 4. D151 .621 —•11 - /sg1_.i1_S • Oaf. TAA, —44=4 !900 COUP TELEPROMPTER OF SEATTLE N. W c� rift, _ • mu PHASF / . T UK Wit DA11 SCAU , D4..WRM_•r 2�ci� l =li.0� ,_2pi1 STNAND PLANT LiUAL TUNN'ILA .5425 • 444 _5656/ TRACED SY DESIGNED SY APPROVED NAME DATE • A/C.1.4, 311:T a‘Z-4-LY_ 1 REVISION DATE SY _{›.0-1PUNi: AMP. CAPPtul) TRUNK I. C 010LE T Y E 'Platt ICMAL D3P -CP-C AV .. • C LINE LK ivNQER • -FC . r SPL IT rt:N I Vatiy ‘ NOUSE" COUNr 1 . -cz,. 1 ■ (1.:51%-.... , I Tri''s •" C1-1 (1'2 • 19'• / - • - • , 1 TELEF;.O.V.:'72. OF SEATTLE • PHASE 1 cRoss-r, DM 2.5_72 ,.•10 5 TWANO . . • • , Pf.ANr DOA( s 1360' 414F h. 5717 y • X T-11 E- 4.4 1,1 sr (4. rr to (SI 7,• 1364'T 640'F 54.62 V X T-l0 E- 2A ovtt tit 1116 0 04' (3 Iry 0 CHNG. OF EXIST SYST UR 1. 2750 DUAL '750 DUAL /30 5' -2 2020 T 0F 60.0 V X T-11 • SCHOOL MN 1 /377:41' 141 57 11 4. 1*•• „ 5• 1. JU L 2 5.1991 TUKVViL, .7: Tax-, At, KC. 9 E.24, 1237 T 540'F 559V - .r r. 121 5 .914T C-I3 .14 0. 1 115 1 1 1 l49 T 6 F 0 " 5 •4 v K 13 E- 2 • 1,0 RACED BY DESIGNED $Y AMOVID NAME DAII REVISION DAH dr . g'1•?, 7 .... ..... 1.. 7. n.. ..-i, .. ,....., .....• .,-. I loo) I fv,. .. t'2". , 4,t4:4 "1. a 11 j. 77 t-2? T PUNK —[>0.- TRUNK AMR— esr.....tri) 015 v— Soo -I /67, • 5�)-5 • LM ExleivorP DIRECTIONAL TAP ---e-="4 --D>-- 5C .11kIE EXTENDER 2:wAY 5PLi T TER 51* -8 1900 • HOUSE" COON 1' Q -o • 0•2 ®-4 0 POP • • • — • 1:2TRCINK CABLE TYPE TELEPROMPTER OF SEATTLE N. w. CABLE 113/111 OULE VA 1? nA" 5-10 —72,""" 1= 100 1"1112/ R FrA,V7 DUAL SIPANV KC !i49 3216 20219' T- 21- 9 0 R750 CUM. zT.5 0 /J3 4 CITY LIMITS o • ". 4 ......... 1EL E1,I,OMPTER WILL TIE INTO TRUNK • 1- 6 UNIT ono sup I -18 UNIT r. /37 risi • • . • . . . . , KC.I E•1 • 132 53 55. • £ /SP TV I-38C1N,T E. A KC 2 50, 7 V 137 647 .T. i.rr. ••5 ® Tr4,41Lcli V PARK 1-14 UNIT 61 es 0 'IT' 3" . 0,• NAME !RAU° DISIG4AD -11 4- r.4:yr ..-17 D I. fir r z,3 el. PI r.f1,•; c . ...„ AmOvID TY'''''...k... t.... (! oz ._ te.t0.1— — - - - - 4. . Ir.' P17 in ; 1 T-2/21,9 • TRuNK, TRUNK ANte.'L. /pry SRL—NI:V.11 1:1Q0--g {> ow' EA I' ENDE R I DIRECTIONAL TAP —1i1p7- "ACC LINE EXTENDER 1900 1 2-WAY SPL IT TER HOUSE • COUN'T ,4 src-8 0.0 et 0-2 4 1' TRUNK CABLE TYPE So-ny taPTER TELEPROMPTER OF SEATTLE 404,. c4pLE 1:49LE 17 EibrOLEVA00___ eARK PLANT DUAL • RAINO • t w N 7 - al - • JUL 2 5 1991.. TUKWiLA PUBLIC WORK, • • 0 .r. /2 I T,49 J.7. 1 • 1232'7' .527F 50.4 v X T-13 0 t E-2 • X T-s2 1226'T 700F Itt' 54/34 V S . /30 TA, T-I3 @SP-5 DCP -8 2163' T 1033.F 52.93 V ' sr nee • R7 1267 T i ,7•• 607 F XT-13 '9 E-I D ! X T- 12 • 5P-1 2041' T 163' F • V 17, (79 /al • • • 1 • f•JAL 2 750 Ak.in N•sCir4tD B• APPROVID _ • N•mi °Alt RiV11191, TRUNK — TrAiN( AWL. enAra) • :2J .) I I ) (NSF. g 2 — SOO " I.: 190-1 - t>- . 1 11i / CYREt DONAL TAP r 7-7 / 1900 •- 41. HOUSE COUN 7 - - I .. 00 0 - 0 '2 0' • -- - ..... or . ' L IlVE EXTENDER R AGC LINE EA'7ENDER 2•tVAY SPLITTER STC•8 • , / C) ,Rivare r )pr PWP. LJ surpc y • titiciPIER N.W. CANE PI445E CROSS -T7E' °'87P • ' r:: /00' ' '71 9 R , Ft A N T 56711 STRMID • • ,Z• • •-• ,l I -1 59.50 / '/ ........v••w err.... q.. ti -P 4• : .5 s • 12 S2" T 247'F 57.6 4 V KC-// E Jo. /367r JT. 0 IJE 15 5E 1 t> n a / \'T 16 SP -4 /593 T \ 7..20 \ V 'r'.. 5 • JUL z 5 1991 TUKWiLi- PUBLIC WOR, Jr of d 1318' T 253'F 5481 V KC•1SA•l E•3 eo. I4.' or its KC- 1IA E•3A 55.6 / V • 1138. • .354•F 1291'T 320'F 55.42 V KC -lIA E•2 • ®- - --Q5— t • s' O 1+ t 1193•T 740'F 55.0 v KC•ISA •IA • TRACID BY 7P' NAM[ DISIGNIO BT(;i'4.[?. JT. DAI( RIVISKN4 DA I( dl I _ 1990 . I _ ;OUSE COUNT DROP . • APPROvto er 1 -- 7- 21 -20 Tk1NK — -- DISL 1121 - SQI.1 -1 DIPf.T•T✓_''. SL TAP .�rrgr • IF TPUNK AWL. (~:..:: LINE EXTE OER AGC LINE F•Y1ENDFR .'-WAY '_'/'L!77LR 5 rc -8 Ca�.• .•.ra KC•I IA E -24 54.48V I.7 4 .y' T.' 39•I•f: rPurisc i L. _f r ,Vt... 1 CoBLE CAB1•E P;w; PHASE. 1 CR°55 -•TIES ..J am ;.,_,..•.:1 ___e__!?.__......_ -72 1•� -_IOU• r..•.I:r2c 1S 1P.. PI AN`T CUAI STRAND 12b'-4" PUG CONDUIT • 4' R., 45° BEN BEGIN CONDUIT Al EXIST POLE WITH 9'R ,90' BEND. COP 12° ABWE EXIST GRADE. Z33'- 4" STEEL CONDUIT 141' -9" PVC CONDUIT POLE ° 161 W/ i6AI POWER CAT■ 7EL. 4' R. )40° BEND EIPAMSION JOINT PAVEnEN1 SEAT 1 BEGIN STEEL CONDUIT RND BRIDLE ATTACHMENT END STEEL CONDUIT AND BRIDLE ATTACHMENT SITE PLAN r.�o A/W ENO CONDUIT AT EXIST. ROLE WITH 9' K. 90° BEND. CAP IZ" ABOVE EXIST, GRADE. • GUARD RAIL SIDEWALK SOUTH BOUND LANE 1._G. MIN. PROPOSED CONDUIT ALIGNMENT SECTION BRIM B2/D6E ,1ILTI - ADHESIVE' ANCHOR DETAIL (__ I ao I1 55t PIPE I cLamP a ECI. HMI lap 3/4. ANCHOR BOLT &LINE MINT C+W Iw EL 1 BASH CHANNEL OR ECL. TO BRIDGE W/ HILTI HFA j/8" ADHESIVE ANCHOf PPE STRAP DETAL i A SHEF i \l 1 i =(O d SCALE • ...... ..... ..... : ,L4 yeti. ..•..• =l2 - 4 - /� — o — /0 —l7 '1,4.1.m.7/15/1:11 4 Sat Drawd0. Drawn AFmroved 0. D.. Numb SHEET 4 Site Plan ICI Power Pole PVC Conduit Steel Conduit PVC Conduit DawitSy�,�EA Power Pole ►�� Not to Scale PACIFIC e eoS 01 10N ry 35Av5 SAV9£ r (n V 51 Av S (, $ 52 Av S ) i ,, j ,v I; 1 r.II/ 1 isi,, c y pj N 62 Av S r0 P� wgP"DYI 53 Av S v El) (1) (n to ,...lea:....... 57AvS 56 Av S •• 59Av: (n _....... N61 Av 62 T S1 hic 0) • Minn CITY OF TUKWILA --' PLANNING DEPT. • V1 1 M-2L R -1 -7.2 v , M -2L M- 2-1.7:2 ; �� IM p I' -1t t�I • C -� : .2-- .•„ :t b1.2• Oita \�\ E Ej • 3- C9.1 w • L. \ ') M -2 • M -1 •Tdn. ^T t ... .. M -2 J SI ,TUKWILA- M I SHORELINE, `} ,\ / <� !`114-1 -7.2 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND I L- A I S I 11\1(.2 UNDeRGRO U N D BRIDGE CROSSING R -1- 7.2 ,1M -11 1 1 R -1 -7.2 r-j . I_lIT r • T LLLt:, • t c - °mot tf• • R -1 -7.2 :114- t.7.2 '• fiE RMH :r. t R -1.7.2 '; • i t.. • R -1 -7.2 , \'.: , ,s R -1• ._,! +, 7 j rjt W I if I r-----1-1111;:1; (' 1_�a ■ 1 R.1-7.2 .^ �\`� -�.te ;''��-'i tJyI 1 Z,� i <j Tr J �,.. � � 1 .�_ _ J t ti R-1.-7.2 ir - ... k.,,: ,,,,,,,,,,,, 1:1 . 8: -R2-ra icl2c1-1:::—.! _L----1:7' Lit:: :1:'' Ir-1--- "'" ,d'� t I._ SLR -i -7.2 �`!RMMH4F !'ra IL — I �.2 - • ' ( • C-2 .. 14:1 A_-__ fr W'i p p,N 7.2` " -14=1 - r------7-7. rt.! V ;, _, --_— R-A 1 / FOSTER •r\ GOLF COURSE �.•..� RA \. -1.x.2 "1 -d �r1 Jam• J �. -.- y_.... -J y ::♦ Tu j - iT • -_y fff ■ DATE 111 ACTIVI. LOG INIT. • CO 1 ENTS ...•1.01)111+ 1�.►L AL'= 780 C uta 1 ed(eAtertiak -P r, 1 I:1/ J� ilIt■t._i E M �L4 1 /I/.e ,i / .Ad IJI 4 '4414lc_ 1, OrlfLi *e-e/ tL:Vih 04.00 4.L...11�•1 An! i , ►t�� ��.�.�i1 1'►, . "P4 J;E!_�►•A ►,..ud'���IL�. E�1,►.t..'-►..'�i�► ►.i. ►+ ... fit. ,��u �\T�/ ,d)1y 3 '1 aN 011OP IMP Z9A 10/Elen (QS It...._ .. CO .: -LAL Alb �, �k110/ f is 1 ∎v '1ri &rum Mon Lek. j`. .1/1 -141Jti ,f__funimmomismwo , /', 4 �ii_1.!1. 1J ` �. `1� ,I�• . `t•sa aME 1 _ ■ v. 0 1.re1111011. [►1 i"- =ter .EVE MUlail ilk% . OA'.: 10.0 t a ∎\ • . ti lie k, a►o1 c ,_ IENANIMMIN IS • ►►• _ I►1 ►�'�11A 0