The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-45-91 - BOEING #3-801 - FLIGHT TEST ENGINEERING LABS AND FIRE PROTECTION BUILDINGBOEING FLIGHT TEST ENGINEERING LABS & FIRE PROTECTION FIVE STORY BUILDING # 3 -801 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH EPIC 45 -91 CITY OF T UKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWIL.A. WASHINGTON 98188 August 21, 1991 PHONE # (2061433-1800 Gang L. l-anDusen. Mayor King County Environmental Division Joshua Goldfinger, Environmental Planner, SEPA Section 3600 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 -1400 RE: SEPA No. T -91 -00086 Boeing Flight Test Engineering Labs & Boeing Fire Protection /Security Building Gentlemen: Thank you for the opportunity to review these two proposals. We understand they are submitted as part of a Pre - Application Review, for which King County will only issue a Determination as to their likely Environmental Thresholds. There seems to proposal with Building 3 -840 what expansions be some confusion with regards to the 3 -840 Building respect to detailing what is existing. Assuming exists, it is not clear from any footprint drawing are being provided or where remodeling is occurring. Per the assumption that Building 3 -840 exists and no expansion beyond its existing footprint occurs the appropriate SEPA comments are as follows: 1. The City of Tukwila's concerns pertain to water, storm drainage, traffic and transportation issues. As long as these facilities generate the same levels of traffic /trips on East Marginal Way, then there is no impact to mitigate. The p.m. peak hour thresholds have been determined /documented for East Marginal Way, through studies by Entranco and CH2M Hill for the entire Duwamish Corridor, which includes Boeing property for these two projects. The lack of drainage facilities and upgrades of the storm system serving the properties and East Marginal Way South will occur with the street improvements. While key intersections are already at an unacceptable level of service "F ", revisions to East Marginal Way are funded and construction expected to be complete by the end of 1992. With completion, the substandard intersections will have sufficient capacity to accommodate new development. Funding participation in these water drainage and roadway improvements is to come from all the abutting landowners, and pertains to improvements to the water system, street, storm drain system, curb, gutter and sidewalk areas. The City requests that King County incorporates in findings /recommendations--section for the projects, mitigation measure. 2. The proponent agrees to participate on a fair -and- equitable /bases for roadway and utility improvements to East Marginal Way. These include the street, storm drain system, water system curb, gutter, sidewalks, lighting and landscaping as appropriate and as determined at time of application. The proponent also agrees not to protest the formation of an LID to carry out the roadway utility improvements on East Marginal Way including anyone, combination of or all of the following: to include street, storm drainagae, water system, curb, gutter, sidewalks, lighting and landscaping as appropriate and is determined at the time of application. Because the Fire and Security building is adjacent to East Marginal Way, and because it may be affected by the provisions of the forthcoming Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, we note that screening of the parking area will be important, especially as seen from the adjoining street. We note the checklist states the tallest height of this fire building to be 125 feet, but the plans and elevations suggest a considerably lower height, possibly 36 feet. Are there conflicts with FAA guide slope regulations? If this structure is 125 feet it appears to exceed FAA standard, as well as the 115 feet building height limit set by Tukwila's M -2 zoning which triggers Design Review. We have reviewed the plans for the proposed flight test engineering laboratories. While the checklist is silent on the number of displaced parking stalls we note there will be an additional 150 stalls. Our concerns for effective screening and parking lot landscaping pertain here as well as to the previously discussed Fire /Safety building. Given the present visual confusion of facades, colors, and materials used in structures in this Boeing Field Environment, we encourage consistency and compatibility in these and future projects. If confusion exists with regards to the scope of this project, the City requests an extension of time for our comment period. We trust these comments are helpful in your review. incerely, Ora ack Pace Senior Planner xc: Phil Fraser, Public Works • TV061.5 REC1711"' JUL 16 1991 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 3 -801 Building is a 5 story building that will be buil§ E P A adjacent to the 3- 0 building, a structure that is simular to the proposed -80 building. The 3 -801 building is being constructed to house the Flight Test Engineering Laboratories. These laboratories consist mostly of raised floor computer labs but several electronic calibration labs are included. The 3 -801 Building will have 78,00 square feet gross. This building will be located on North Boeing Field approximately 80 feet to the west of the existing 3 -800 building. The building will have an existing foot print of 100 feet by 200 feet. The 3 -801 building will be five stories tall. Each story will be approx. 14 feet high, resulting in a total heigth of 70 feet. The workers that will be housed in the 3 -801 building are currently located on North Boeing Field in the 3 -390 and 2- 35 Building. Upon completion of the 3 -801 building, the 2 -35 Building will be demolished and be returned to parking. • Tqloob�s' King County Executive Tim Hill Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: RECF '7 JUL 16 1991 SEPA The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: The environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). • • For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 3 -801 Building North Boeing Field 2. Name of applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact Paul Crane PO Box 3707 M/S 63 -01 Seattle, Wa. 98124 4. Date checklist prepared: April 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County BALD 6. Proposed timing schedule(including phasing, if applicable): N/A 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Upon completion of the 3 -801 Building, the 2 -35 building will be demolished and returned to employee parking. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A geotechnical report will be issued to King Co. BALD SEPA. at a later date. . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building Permits Utility Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description). See attached. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached. TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate slope ?) 2 X or less. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for ex. clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck ?) If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The site is 100% covered by asphalt and /or concrete. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No grading or filling is proposed other than removal of asphalt and soil for a foundation. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No, site is 100% impervious surface. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? • • 100% of the site is covered by impervious surface now and will remain as such. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An erosion control plan will be incorporated before and during construction, when soil is exposed. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No emissions to the air will be the direct result of this project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. None needed. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Duwamish River is approx. 1/2 mile from this project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 ft) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Ho. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...: agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be collected in existing storm water catch basins and discharged into the existing storm water sewer. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None needed. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _ grass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposed landscaping will be a an aestetic design of trees, shrub and groundcovers. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES • a. What kinds of energy (electrical, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for heating, lighting and office equiptment. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: This building incorporates energy efficent design. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None needed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Aircraft noise exists ajacent to the project, The windows of the building will be designed to insulate against this, to an acceptable Dba level that has been incorporated the other ajoining buildings on this site.. 2)' What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The short term will be construction noise, there will be no long term noise impacts associated with this project. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: • • None needed. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is current use of site and adjacent properties? Aircraft manufacturing. b. Has site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no currant structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No demolition will take place that will be needed to build this building. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 160 people will work in this building. These people are presently on site in ajacent office trailers. No new employees will be added to the site. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None needed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The surrounding area of the proposed building is support offices and Aircraft preperation areas. This building will house office workers presently on site, located in temporary office trailers. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The proposed building will be 5 stories high (70 feet). The building will be constructed of precast concrete panels . b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed buildings facade will match the ajacent building which is of simular bulk and scale. The Construction of this building will allow the removal of existing temporary office trailers 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No glare will occur, windows will be tinted. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Glass will be tinted as in ajacent buildings to prevent any glare. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A jogging trail and joggers shelter with showers and lockers are within walking distance. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION • a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Approx. 500 feet to the nearest Metro bus stop. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? During construction there will be a displacement of Parking stalls. After the project is completed the temporary office trailers will be removed and a total site net gain of parking spaces will be 150 stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, the project is situated on King County Airport also known as North Boeing Field. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project will generate no new trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: There will be no increase in transportation impact as a result of this project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on public services, if any: None needed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity from Seattle City Light Water from Seattle Water Department Sewer from Metro C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature Date Submitted fib Of Li / VISION APPROVED DATE. SVM. REVISION. ❑ AUBURN, :WA.. 98027 ❑ EVERETT,:' .WA. 98201;; ❑ KENT, WA. 98931.4., ❑ PORTLAND, OR.. 912202r ❑ RENTONE:_'. WA.. 98035.5r4 ❑ SEATaTLE,.. 'WA.- 91424t? DATE SVITTEEE . i SPECIFICATION 15 APPROVED APPROVED EV •' DER. DATE� SNICKED APPROVED BOEING .: .. , FLIGHT. TEST ENGINEERING:. LABORATORIES::.: TS•■413-STS•i--413'STS..-----48"STS•■— kirso.1.771 b.. ,V1W7 . •NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE ( MET ) •1159b-ID li 171i,ci-, 1 ' i -AMA •i;iiiagNof.,..? *.? - ., ...-Ing . l...=4;1.4EA-45M.,„„ 4,\\VaDM14102. 4"p.--,!-Ntjl i. ' XMIS 't-4•-• ''' ":"W•n-Alp " " . '33'''.4,:i.'' %El ti ,7W-,', "__-.4.- •:.,..Z.-,..: 49P3g 4•741, \ - -.=-'. 'i:,.*•-'_..,..;,--; hk. `. b NOTES • - - AVICATES LOCATION PD? BOEAV (BE & C OICAMIS) UPDATED PRELDWART RECORD DRUIDS NOs. C44. C45 C46 & C100 FOR JOB NO. 87101/502502 AS PROVIDED By BEN DUMA P ON • • WY 29, 1991; ACORMIDDN NOT ANDEPENDENTLY VEDFED BY SUWEYOR AM:1 SLADOR ASSUMES ' • RESPOW0217Y IIS COMPLETENESS 0 R ACCURACY. . . . 1. MURAL Daum - top (PORMERLY KNOWN AS SEA "LEWEL LMIUM -NM AS PROVIDED BY HORTON - ." DENIES & ASSOCMIES 0 N POWS MD 'MOLE PONT -AND WED TO ESTABUSH FEINTS FID-1 97D-2 AS ShOPN HEREON.001 PREVVLS SURVEY SHEET C-2,- DATED 1411U4ffT 1988). 2 HORIZONTAL DATUM WASHINCTON STATE PUNE COORDIMIES NORTH IOW AS PROVIDED DT Hamm • WINIS & ASSOCIVIS ON 999715 NV 'ANGLE PONT C A10 WED ID ESTABL6II POINTS FID-1 AND 97D-2 AS SHORN HERON (FROM PREVIOUS tar start SI1EET C-2, DATED &WNW 4984 • LEGEND. snea .. m . - TELIPNLAE NOHOW - SUITART SEVER MIME 0 - goal awN maw D• - CANN BASIN 03 • • poru r wear tr. - FRE HYDRANT 9 a • . - AO= WNW • ® - NU 1916921£ 6. - tWIDVAPPED ACCESS - 943T 901:4TOR WIDE • - 0850764D7N KU. I=1 - MIER VALET - • - -v- - WIRT MAE ... —4 - Eiff MOTOR .. TEL • - LAVERCR000 IFIEct01E • PWR - UNDERGROUND FOII •.. - . SAN - SWTARY 31017 1.9E _ WTR - OM LIE STS -• STORM SEWN LE 0 - MONUMENT EFOUTC) . : • • BE&C ENGINEERS REVISION O AUBURN, WA . 98002 0 BELLEVUE , WA . 98007 0 EVERETT , WA . 9820 I 0 KENT , WA . 98031 0 PORTLAND, OR. 97220 0 RENTON, WA . 98055 • SEATTLE , WA . 98 I 24 9-11-91 LAST REVISION TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY JOB Ie. 87107J502302 OWE 7790 NO. 1019201.990 ,1• IIMEMEBEIMMEMEMP I II 113., ••?,•..k. EAST ELEVATION • • • INIESENg -2.- 1. \7 47Afgwe , = ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION • 7 / 19 / 91 SY - niV‘i■On APPROvED A/VISION • FACILITIES DEPARTMENT 0 AUBURN, WA. 98002 • 0 EVERETT, WA. 98201 0 KENT, • WA. 98031 D PORTLAND, OR. 97220 0 RENTON, WA. 98055 0 SEATTLE; WA. 98124 ACCEPTABILITI • TleS DEVON Asuleft SPECt5CATION 5 APPROVED St/STRIA LAST SIVLSION SNIP • • • APFROVED sr 1 DM. DAY! BOEING FLIGHT TEST ENGINEERING LABORATORIES :1 6,,e4.111,;; • ..t.4. -.:.-.'i...,".,I.N,, -,:! -,, ■47,:i..;,.-rz,..';', 111111i0Mi. .1E239, it,i I1-, ..-..:., 1 . , ',.,• i-,,-. i ,,,..L5.:,,,-.1:.-..;. i.,,,,L.' ---- . . . . . . ,,. :-,..;1 .,', : • , , • IIESEIBRIEURIMIERIMMEllzi'llWailinglEISMEIllitillilgi-':111111111 immisammoismia - ESE IIIEBB IMME111.1.11111011111 Mil =V IIHMEEMEMEHMENEINCII • lit/MEM ,„.„. .. . , :11 AIM= -J:.:11111131111 k • . . • - • • . • .. '..,;.: \ ; a - _ . . . IIMINESEESEIIICIFINEMEN, IffiEttEM,., , .,..; -1 AEON r HMO 11111111 1111121M qi ME II ommaimoslii • . • 1 -1.. t ENEEIMEMEMEES c,,... ,,-., :41:w,..1-:::,-,..---:i. =;.:!1.g.1,1..:7,..:::,:::.•-.4- ?JENS II - • ES ':,:it1111111 II • • : ii ......7...7.............. I .r pglistv7 ;; • • . 71.1= g.,, &HMG , .tp!.,..0...Lt.,; ,• ,.. •-:1 ": . ",,,Z): '..t.±. • s- . BERMES ' ...,,,, . ..',...1...,z-;I,,.4 'Pi • ,:` - 111S:"}Z.: "-, ,', • 4... [ L'' ...-'-',25 ' L7a- •'--TiVir::‘' 44.4 ,.., F" r. . • ilor= ait2=1 ' . 13111:0 , ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION • 7 / 19 / 91 SY - niV‘i■On APPROvED A/VISION • FACILITIES DEPARTMENT 0 AUBURN, WA. 98002 • 0 EVERETT, WA. 98201 0 KENT, • WA. 98031 D PORTLAND, OR. 97220 0 RENTON, WA. 98055 0 SEATTLE; WA. 98124 ACCEPTABILITI • TleS DEVON Asuleft SPECt5CATION 5 APPROVED St/STRIA LAST SIVLSION SNIP • • • APFROVED sr 1 DM. DAY! BOEING FLIGHT TEST ENGINEERING LABORATORIES - a1 .____fir VAAVIV il4RR►Wo PLANNING ARCHITECTURE `ENGI-NEERING • PLANNING : ARCHITECTURE :. ENGINEERING INTERIORS 3 -8o! '3urT.D11aCT LEGAL D=5CR1 ;ON:: 11PPPPiA 47°56 .05' EAST 255.16 EE' ALONG T4E 30UN049Y OF . .5A.D PREILI ,NH: AGILITY- ?ROPERT Y'. `JCL MCP 42.06'55 "'EAST ;100.25 FEET ALONG THE 80.165AR' OF SAID PR0_FLI GH "FA CAL: Tv PROPERTY: THE'OE NOP -. 28 °42'05" wE iT '299 71 -E -T 6OPE OR -_ :SS . ALONG THE • BOJND4P• OF14541 D PREFL I GHAT FACiLI TY PROPERTY TO THE .80UNDARY90F THE ELECTRON, CS 6UILDI NIG . PROPERTY: THENCE NOM ' 61 °17'55" EAST 20.00 FEET ALONG T14E BOUNDARY Cr SAID ELECT NON: CS 901101 9 0 4 1. 0 4 3 6 '. , . • .• PROPERTY • , TTHENCE'MORTH 28.42'05' WEST 52 70 FEE1 - ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID EL EC -PONI CS BUILDING • 98096901., 1 HENCE NORTH 61°17. 55". EAST :1'3.20, FEET „ ALONG THE BOUNDARY • OF SA: D' ELECTRONI CS 3'JIL0I6G PROPERTY:.] HENCE NORTH 28.42'05' WEST 350.00 FEET ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF 5A10 ELECTRONICS 8)11.0: NC - PROPERTY: THENCE 00)14 61.17'55" WEST 133:20. FEE', . MORE OR LESS. ALONG. THE 80590ARY OF 5A10 " EL ECT PON ;CS 3U M.D. NC PROP_,9TY "0 'THE' 30UNWPY OF 5A.D ?REFL. GHT: FAC IL. Ty PPOPE?T1-, THENCE NORTH • 28.42'05° WE5T 12.215 50 FEET. • MORE OR LESS. A "SONG' 'THE • BOUNDARY OR. SA :D PREFL -'G"T .AC'L:TY EST .HANGAR ALONG'THE 9O.;ND R OF 5A :0 FL: GHT .14ANGAR PROPERTY TO HE'NOR(HEA ST CORNER OE 14 . BOUNDARY OF SA LO FL GHT TEST HANGAR 9909671/ • THENCE SCUT H 61 °' 7 'S5" WEST 464 00 A E17 ALONG THE .' 'BOUNDARY OF 5A10 FL GHT TEST ANGAR ROP -T THENCE. SOUTH '8 °42'05'- EAST 483 38 E 4L0NG 1. THE 90UNDAPI OF: SAID FL HT.' EST HANGAR PROPERTY: ' 'THENCE SOU' H 42 °07'50" 'TEST 569 50 rEET -. 605E OR LESS. ALONG THE. 50UNOA RY OF SAID FL. 0 TEST . .HANGAR ?ROPER -Y 10.1 HE EASTERLY AARG'.N OF EAST r. 1ARGI NAL 94'(. T446506 %DRT H 47.52'10" WEST 25 78 - • FEET FOLLOW. WIG' SA I0 EASTERLY MA PGIN THENCE NCR1H .4.27 "51" WEST 326 17 FEE' THENCE NORTH 47.52'10" • .wEST '15.46 FEET, TNENCT NORTH 4°27-51! WEST ' 170,76. FEE `. 74 THENCE PORT H 1°33 '45" WEST' .727 30 'FEET 10 THE 001 NT Or • CURVATURE 044 8 CURVE UA E' CURVEG A RADIUS OF 76 -.00 FEE'. - "TO THE LEFT AN -ARC DI STANCE OF 11.5 40 FEE' TO - THE FOI NT OF - 4805907 OF SAID CURVE. THENCE NORTH BOUNDARY or 41445 COUNT FEET A I RPORI ((''90E I NG .1I EL 0) ' _ THENCE NORTH 13 °23'54' EAST 350.85' FEET ALONG 860 BOUNDARY. OF SAID AIRPORT, THENCE NORTH 30.09.39 "' ,. EAST 240.00 FEET ALONG THE "BOUNDARY OF SAID 41990811 THENCE NORT H 50.57.34' EAST '3.71 FEET' OR THE' BOUNDARY OFGPTROPE6T1NLLE LEASED BYABOE NG RT • 'MARCH 2E '953,T4 OK IEC INUVOLR 52AOF KNI NGD 4N RECORDED TCOUNTY 980969 ? COW, 5510NE6 RECORDS ON PAGE 271 (5510 PROPERTY 861 0G:HERE. NAF 1 ER REFERRED 1C AS THE - 'TANK -TEST PROPER: Y. SOUTH PORTION). THENCE SOUTH .38.19'56" EA5T51' 70 FEET ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF' • •55.1 D TANK TEST..980665TY . 50UT H PORTION; THENCE "NORTH 51.40'041. EAST 380.00 FEET ALONG THE • BOUNDARY. OFESA'NDTANK NORTH. 385T9'36 EWES- 56 SOUTH 8 PORTION. FEET, WIRE OR !LESS . ALONG 'T HE PROPERTY OF • SAID TANK TESTS PROPER( 430SO SOUTH PORTION, TO THE BOUNDARY OF KING COUN7Y AIRPORT (BOEING . FIELD) -. THENCE' NORTH 60.57'34" EAST 46 24 FEET • ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF- SAID AT RPM .• THENCE SOVRNDARY OF 5A11 DCAASRP0RT NC 0. 0T HEE SOUTH THE 28 °42'13-' EAST, ALONG A II NE APALL E'' -'TO AND 525.00 FEET .ROM THE CENT ERL'NE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY A DI STANCE OF 636.00 FEET MORE OR . LESS. 10 A 01' M '100.00 FEET 14041 HE NOM' H- -'ERLL EDGE OF THE SERVICE CENTER APRON, THENCE' "NORTH 89 °56'52" EAST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO' AND' 100.00. FEET FROM THE AFOREMENTI ONO . APRON' A- DI ST4NCE OF'63.40 FEET. YORE OR LESS TO A' 'POINT THAT 15'470 00 FEET FR09 THE CENTENLI NE OF THE MAIN RUNwAr 1116495 SOUTH 8 °42'13" AST' 'ALONG A : INC PARAL' -EL 10 AND 470 00 FEET F NOM• 'THE CENTERLI NE' OF 1 H MAIN RUNWAY, 1HIS LINE - .,9'E: NG. T HE EASTERLY EDGE OF THE ROw OF -'AST FENCES'. A 01 STANCE OF 3.400.00 FEET. MORE OR '. LESS TO THE NORTHERLY EDGE OF THE CYCLONE • FENCE: THENCE I NORTH 61.17'47" EAST'A DISTANCE OF 28 00 FF_:7410 :HE FENTERLI NE OF THE- 444086- - "MENTIONED CYCLONE FENCE' THENCE SOU1•9 28.42 13 ". .EAST ALONG 5A;0 FENCE LY ENG- PA RALLE: TO AND • '442 00 FEET. FR04 (4E CENT ERLINE OF THE 44A 1N ' RUNw64. A D. STANCE .OF 1,315.73 FED . MORE OR -LESS, TO THE TRUE P01 NT OF.9E01NNI NG. EXCEPT THAF AREA KNOWN AS THE SOUTH SUPPRESSOR AREA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; A "RECTANGULAR - SHAPED - - PARCEL OF PROPERTA I NW SECT tON 2 N,TO NSHIP 24 .. _ '.NORTH. RANGE ' EAST ' • MSGR18ED AS POL.075: C046..ENC I NG AT HE IN1ER- SECTION OF THE EAST 1.1 NE OF SAID SECTION 29 • • W. T4 THE CENTERLINE OF EAST MARGINAL WAY AND.; . "RUNNI NG THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE NORTH. -. -0 °47'.47' EASTi.85 07 FEET 10 T iEENORT HEASTERLY - 44RGIN OF EST MARDI NAL .WAY HENCE NORTH - . • -15 °,04'37 ^;WEST 3 134 17 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT 'OF :BEG! NNI NG; T HENCE SOUTH 69.57128 "'WEST - t90.00 FEET.. THENCE NORTH 0.02'32". WEST 268 OC - :FEET; THENCE NORTH 89.57'29" EAST 190.00 FEET: .. T HENCE. • SOUTH: 0.02 32' EAST 268,0C FEET TO THE - TRUE' 60491.'OF BEGINNING. THIS TRAC( CONTAIN. NG - AN AREA OF 32,649.529 SQUARE FEET. NORE'OR 'LESS ' (GENERAL WE i1: S I DE. AREA 50,: OF CONTROL TOWED) -ALSO', AN IRREGULAR- 3H9PE0 TRACT OF LAND BETWEEN THE MAIN RUNWAY ON. S I NG COUNTY AI RPORI (BCE: NG F. ELO) ANC . EAST 44 RGI NAL WAY IN SECT ON 33 TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH - RANGE 4 EAST i, wrLA4ETT.E NE9101AN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, BEGINNING AT CONCRE TE 604164EN1 DES: GNAT ED AS NONU4ENT '0' ANO HAVING U S. COAST AND GEODE,' I C SURVEY COOR7' NAVE '. • VALUES' OF 141.637.271 14 Y °'95.531 46; -HENCE SOu7H • 72 4811 6ESi 223',73 FF -T •10 THE INT ER5E7T' ON 7A A LINE • - PARALLEL TO AND :25.00 'FEET STOUT HNESTEPL• FROM' -HE - CENTER!INE OF AFCREMENTI OWED 80NAVAY- THENCE NORTH - 53°06'55- 44E51 A 3I STANCE OF 42.53 EEET.10-1HE TR'AE POI N1 Or BEG. NN NG OF THE 7 PACT HERE. N 7E5CR'3E0;.. .THENCE 1041.- 53.06'55- wE51 594 43 FEET LURE CH .555. H. ALONG 'HE 803440491 OF SAID AIRPORT 15.7HE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST VA NGI NAL WAY: THENCE 10914 22 °32'15" • ,. • WEST 201 47. FEET. MORE OR LESS. 011041NG -SA "0 • EAST ER'LY.MA ?GIN TO THE- 00. NT. OF I CURVENCEE4 ALONG SURD HAVING 4. RAO119 OF 2.928 00 _�_ CURVE. 70' T HE'LEF T AN .pc DIS "ONCE -OF 463.82 F 'THENCE NOR, H. 52. 54' 55` • EAST A 0I STANCE OF 211.70 FEET MORE OP LESS. TO A PO. NI ON THE CENT ERL1 NE OF A • CHAIN -'_: INN .%EN.CE THENCE 5001 H'28 °42'13" 1(65' 610(0 _ THE CENT ERL.NE OF THE CHA'N -LINK FENCE 451 CH IS PARA' -LEL. TO 3E47591 NE OF RON3VA,' 34'3' L_ A • �-D1STANCE OF N . 99.27 FEE' ; 409E 0R LESS. 10 THE. TRUE POT N1 OF; 9E7 NNTNG: SAID TRACT OF LAND CON -AI NS AN AREA Or 184.907 SQWIRE FEE -. NGRE OR LESS . • . - A 6: 1 ACRES CmiED - • • ACRE 5 -E 45EG' 75 YEAR "CCMPREHENSI VE•• OR: "SAS IC" LEASE . •REVISED AREA N0. 2 (GENERAL "ACST 51 DE AREA' NORTH OF. CONTROL T Cma R) .- - ' AN.IRPEGULAR- SHAPED TRACT OF LAND BETWEEN THE MAIN RUNWAY' ON • KING COUNTY •AIRPORT. (ROE NO FIELD) AND EAST MARGINAL WAY; I.N: SECTIONS 28, 29 AND:33. TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE .4 EAST . WILLAAETT'E MERIDIAN. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . - BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE YONUPQNT DESIGNATED AS 'MONUMENT ' " D" AND • KAV I NC U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY COORDINATE VALUES ' OF X- ,.637.871.14., Y =195.531'. 46;. THENCE LOUTH 72.48'11"' - • WEST. 229.73 FEET:TO :THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE PARAL•L EL' TO AND 425 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE AFORE - MENTIONED'RUNWAY: THENCE NORTH '53* WEST A.DI STANCE -OF .42.59 FEET TO A POI NT ON THE CENTERLINE OF A -CHAJN -LINK FENCE. THENCE NORTH 28 °42'13" WEST ALONG THE 'CENT ERLI NE OF THE CAIN -LINK FENCE WHICH 15 PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF RUN'NA'/ 13R/31L A OI:STANCE OF 1.334.27 FEET TO THE TRUE ' POINT OF BEG. NN: NG; THENCE SOUTH 62.54'55" WEST A DISTANCE- " OF 220.81 FEET MORE OR LESS. TO THE EASTERLY MARLIN OF EAST ',ANGINAL WAY SOUTH; - THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A' CURVE. TO THE LEFT BEING THE EASTERLY. M4 °GIN•OF EAST MARGI NAL-WAY- SOUTH A 'DISTANCE OF- 685.42 FEET TO THE POI NT' OF TANGENCY, SAID CURVE .HAS A•RADI US' OF' 2'.928: 00 FEET, AN. INTERNAL ANGLE OF - - ..A82 wEST 18.2 F' AND CHORD C4 NO 6 • 683.06 FEEL' THENCE NORTH7.51- 53WEST A DI O -. 643.39 FEET TO 808'0ITY LIMITS OF THE OILY OF AIO-CIT. 'THENCE' SOUTH 88°08 NORTH 4 • 851. '23.21 TEST ALONG SA EET AITN EISEN THENCE NORTH ST.51'55• WEST ; THE 54 NORT 542°0 THE EAST; 13833 'FEE OF EAST NORTH 47- -5'1;' THENCE NORTH 02•EE' - THENCE3SOUTHF42 °08'0 " wESTR138 335 FEET TO 200.00 STTERLYET„ • MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY: THENCE NORTH: 47 °51.55" WEST' 92,61 FEET. TO AN ANGLE •POI NT' IN THE MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL' 'WAY; THENCE NORTH•47 °52'10 "'WEST 781.94 FEET MORE . OR:LESS' ALONG THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST ". • MARL I NAL .WAY' TO THE SOUTH4T07 CORNER. OF THE 'PROPERTY CONVEYED' 'FROM' K1 NG COUNTY, WASHINGTON,- ,. 40 90E I NS. AIPPLANE COMPANY BY DEED OAT ED JUNE '16,1952, AND. RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. • "•4255655 IN vOL. 3169 OF. 'DEEDS , PAGE•256. RECORDS' . OF K NG'COUNTY (SAID PROPERTY BEING HEREINAFTER THENCE ENO. RTOHA 42 °07'50 "•EASTE 321 58 mPOERRT EY)• -OR LESS . ALONG THE - BOUNDARY - OF 5A10 FLIGHT TEST EASED 8Y. BOEI NGT AAIRPLANE.COAPANY. FROM KRN ERTY G . COUNTY UNDER LEASE DATED 'APRIL 2. 1954, AND - 'RECORDSDONNPAGE 3` ((5AIIDN PROPERTY .C8E1NG. HERE EN- A AFT ER:REFERRED TO. AS THE PREFL: GAIT . FAC ILI TY E THENCE 2 14 . FEET ALONG, THE BOUNDARY. OF SAID PP•EFLIGHT FACILITY PROPERTY: THENCE SOUTH 47'52'10" EAST . 363.84 FEET ALONG 1HE'.BOUNDARY OF SAID PREFLI CFI. FACILITY PROPERTY;, THENCE. NORTH 61•'17 55'• EAST.' 150.21 FEET ALONG THE BOUNDARY - OF. SAID- PREFLIGHT FOCI L ITT PROPERTY; THENCE, SOUTH 28.42'05•• EA5T. 440.61 FEET ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PRELIGHT ' FACILITY PROPERTY: THENCE NORTH 61 °.77.56 " -EAST. 16 00 FEET YORE OR LESS, ALONG THE BOUNDARY Of ,SAI0 PREFL ICHT FACILITY PROPERTY - .T0 THE BOUNDARY -. OF THE PROPERTY:. LEASED' BY' BCE I NG AIRPLANE CO. • .FROM KING COUNTY UNDER LEASE :DATED SEPTEIA3ER' 8,.. • 1952. AND RECORDED IN VOL: 51' OF' K I NG COUNTY CO9MI5S IONEPS' RECORDS ON PAGE 484, AND THE • PROPERTY' LEASED .8Y BOEING AIRPLANE CO. FROM? • K NG' COUNTY UNDER SUPPLEMENTAL LEASE DAT ED. MAY • -.25. 1953.: AND 'RECORDED, IN' VOL.- 52 'OF K NG. COUNTY ' COMMI SS IONERS•' • RECORDS ON PAGE 491 (THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THE AFORESAID• LEASE AND SUPPLEMENTAL • LEASE BEING HERE : WAFT ER. REFERRED TO AS THE - 'ELECT RONI CS • BOIL DI NG-PROPERTY)'; • 1 HENCE SOUTH - - 28°42 '05". EAST 325.55 FEET ALONG THE -BOUNDARY'. OF SAID ELECT RONI CS' BU ILDI NG- PROPERTY; THENCE • 50UTH 47 °52 47" EAST 81,88 'FEEL ALONG THE - "BOUNDARY OF SAID ELECTRON: CS BU ILD I NG' PROPERTY: THENCE. NORTH 61.17.55' EAST -33.12 FEET, MORE OR .LESS. ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF .SA I O. ELECTRONICS BUILDING PROPERTY TO THE BOUNDARY OF AFORESAID PREFLIGHT FACILITY PROPERTY; THENCE SOUTH - 2n• -51 '41 "EAST 62'.27 •FEET ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SA I D. PREFL IGHT "-MCICIII 99096915;.1 HENCE SOUTH '..42 °03'55" WEST- 61.23 -FEET ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PREFLIGHT. FACILITY. PROPERTY; -.THENCE SOUTH SITE PLAN NORTH BOEING FIELD SCALE .: NONE CONNERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP- :.NORTH BOEING FIELD - CONCOURSE 11CII. . EODE SUMMARY DESCR I PTION.'OF WORK. DRAWING`I.NDEX ARCH.TECTUPAI•l • .A4''. 'COVERSHEE DE CI NI T7 v �P /SITE PLAN' -' .CONT RACT OR: BOEING 'CONTACT : PHONE. ' APPL CATIO93 /PERM T5 RELATED - TO PROJECT: 'ZONI710 HEAVY AND (TPUBLI C. USE 5UILDTNG CODE ' 1988 UBC RENTON I. 9ARR1 44 496E. 920319EME:475: . WASH STATE .1989:_" 005494(CY..GROUP (SEC 501) :. CONSTRUCTION TYP : ( SEC- 70,1). `ALLO96906 AREA C .EASE'_ FLOOR' AREA "(ACTUAL) - ! BLOC. FOOT PRIM -BLDG 05055. • - ' FIRST 4001,7.••- .. SECOND FLOOR, REMODEL AREA • 7.BUILOING- HE' GAT. (ACTUAL) • _ (TABLE 5 -03. 310RI ES: OCCUPANT_ LOAD:' ( ALLOWABLE). • .- ._ I TABEL 33 -47 OFFICES., 1/100544 • '865E'.IENT AECH /5T OR - i /3000F -. F R5T FLOC? - 001355ENCE • - 1/.155E -.SECOND, FLOOR CLASSROCM-. '.' 1/20SF' . THIRD FLOOR MANUFACTLRING•: 1 /20056 ALL OTHER : '1' /100SF REM1026I AREA 1 RE PROTECT.: ON: SEPERAT :'014 • •, EXT. 'WALL' (NON 8EARI NG) EX• WALL:( BEAR: NG)�'' - - INT. -WALL ( NON-BEAR I NG)..• INT. -.WALL (9E69ING) - STRUCTURAL FRAME . F- OORS /CE'LINGS" ROOF- CONSTRUCTION: ' SEISMIC DESIGN;,,',- .- .DES :ON LOADS: CHAPTER 23). ROOF:- SNOW . .4ECH /5T OR • ,. STAR RS . CO4CENT PAT 5O.- ",. .4FR. I OK ._ ZONE 3 RECEIVED JUL 161991 I ND: -. EX°OSURE ' 40 'SPEC. AL CONDi T IONE. NMY EX ST 'N FACT OP.Y' AREAS'. VER'FY LOAD! NO.'N11H ,AC IL IT: ES -PLANT - ENGINEER PRI OR TO 0E51 GN. .REVISION 98815108 85 ;APPROVED SEPA FACILITIES DEPARTUENJ ❑ AUBURN, WA. 98002 ❑ RENT., .WA 98034' " ❑ ❑ EV- ERETT, WA: 9820)- O 1',9.F. WA '98124-. ❑ 5UBT IILE' - LEGAL `DESCRIPTION- SITE PLANS C 11/1.L MA'ST ER. ACCEPTABIL'1T 81411111'81 W11I) .41141(6 SITE. PLAN 840 8Y DEPT• '. 051E ACTIVIITI 8Y ORAYN :8) 'J 881 SCHI CKECKE0' 8(86 81 OATS- ACT 141.11 8T I 788.E 2 -7 -91 CHECKED APPROVE71 - APPROV D1' RENTON. WA SEATTLE, WA SKEET AT -1 (411 DE- ARCH ,8AGN0 NO 45161 -NG JOB 110. OBA9ING-.N(YBER 3 ED A1-,1