Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-10 - OLSON DONALD - IVY WAREHOUSEJERRY IVY WAREHOUSE EPIGFD -10 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRO /FINAL DECLARATION OF /i'ION-S I GfJ I F I CA JCE Description of proposal Proponent - Location of Proposal Warehouse Building Donald S. Olson, Architect Property located on west side on Andover Park West , Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. This proposal has been determined to (#[not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (4s /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes i VA4)2, Position /Title Director, Office 3f Community Development Date 6 t=c°hi/ VI 77 Signature COMMENTS: • PLANN I ItG PARKS & RECREATION BUILDING 16 June 1977 TY ®Y UKQ VILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Larry Gibbons Division of Hydraulics King County Administration Bldg. Room 976 Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Gibbons: Enclosed please find a copy of the negative declaration of environmental significance on the Don Olson (Ivy) project in the City of Tukwila. If you have any further questions or if you need any other information, please contact me. ely, ed N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor FNS /cw Enclosure 6230 .Southcenter Boulevard n TIIkw.i1a, Washington 98188 m (206) 242 -2177 • CITY OF TUB WILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT S'i?C;ry T`D /FINAL DECLARATION OF gIc,-Ni-i ,.MGE /I'JO►J- -SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Warehouse Building Proponent - Donald S. Olson, Architect Location of Proposal Property located on 'vest side on Andover Park West Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. Ep1L- ---ID This proposal has been determined to (4ay- Eq.not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS Rs/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official rjel1 Stoknes ' . .-4!;-�_ MQ--z- Position/Title Director, Office Gf Community Development Date e Ee bI'? t (e t r - 7-7 Si gna-ture commarrS: CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIOdNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: Warehouse on Andover Park West (Jerry Tvy) PROJECT ADDRESS: Andover Park West @ Minkler (South) DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: January 21, 1977 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ® Planning: February 4, 1977 by: ❑ Police: by: (date) (reviewer) 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: K(iLO N^MM'Nuk vv (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More s ecific information is needed to determine impact. 4,5' ',1.0.01 1)%t12_ ) ofc.D. a I & 117' ignature and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, Phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. • MEMO RANIDUM C0TY" of TUKaiOLA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3 February 1977 TO: Fred FROM: Gary SUBJECT : THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Warehouse on Andover Park West (Jerry Ivy) Additional information provided.by the applicant has alleviated the two reservations which I noted in my Memo of 31 January 1977. 'Copies of the two letters from Upland Industries, one dated 1 February 1977 and the other 2 February 1977, are attached to this Memo and should be considered as additional information to Environmental Questionnaire. Recommend a Declaration of Non - Significance. GC /cw Attachments I- l im-rtAAA. ithevmAktnel a a* ye. MCec. ob utd■ o v1, VD o d w • . p tvi , uplaw,4l 1wdMen't wiA 04, GDIW■ iK -for A 1Pwbdiviiiov4 ex yj'r f or i .tau ur �v , a f U wau r' to 1 `"� mitA vv t-of AEW. • UPLAND INDUSTRIES C O R P O R A T 1 0 N SUBSIDIARY OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION R. M. BLACK R. D. UHRICH MANAGER OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER February 2, 1977 Mr. Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner City of Tukwila 6230 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Gary: Reference is made to the proposed subdivision plat which Upland Industries will progress on our property located westerly of Andover Park West and southerly of Minkler Boulevard in Tukwila. In preparation of the plat for submission we will identify a nonexclusive easement for roadway purposes over the southerly 25 feet of the property. At this point in time we are completing a sale to Jerry Ivy on a portion of the property which was previously identified to you but will not be included within the plat and we will reserve the same easement reservation in the sale. Your information and assistance in this matter is very much appreciated. RDU:mg Very truly yours, R. D. Uhrich SUITE 4028 SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 1001 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE ,WASHINGTON 98154 TELEPHONE (206) 622-8533 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit' from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: InOtJAc.r7 5. < CSO1J A`'fZCNITC'CT° 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: -35GS LoGST tZG' 1 1 , A L- l�'A �? S.'LO. SEA MIS W A SEa. 981C3'& (2";) 93.7. 3400 LI 3. Date Checklist Submitted: JA& 443' 177"7 k ik" /-Z /'7? 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 1 t 0,41.1 `1 11 I cM pGtiJ 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an ac- curate understanding of its scope and nature): C©►2STez1.2CT A WA t2 i-o 'sG 13Lf G, APJ7T OX LOO X • 100 111/4.9 512E, CUNCROE7G TILT tW cxxoST WGTIOiJ tom/ P1OG, 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts,.in- cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): rrzo17GrzTY Linc-CbTEI oP u cS'r 5(•C ora 40t7OVC2 r✓Qrzlc WEST J t2 57 PO tzTI-4 Orr TNC SOO TI-IC -E Z WEST R.2S1c.JG s Pt6,1114. Sire IS ADt71ZOX 17.5 FCGT LUNG 10 I OrcTN :SO(7714 t-Lr CTfC-, ,tt 380 1=GCi' try t T IOCST o1rZC- cT►Ou. TNC LOS"-Jr GOVlXv2V OF Sire r5 A ex) sr rzr2 Trzier TNC C-ASr 13ot71.'02y (6 A00OVGIT E'412.1c tvGSl'. TI-La ►9OrzrH 13CJtiric7rZV t S TO 13G A T=crl't -'t ST2GGT t.X1f YET r30 1LT. THE SDUTN rgouornZ+T !S A GXUST /VG PrziOATS p 4p 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: JO lie 1 , 1977 7 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO 1C (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES X- NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO (e) Sewer hook up permit YES'( NO (f) Sign permit YES X NO (g) Water hook up permit YES X NO (h) Storm water system permit YES ( NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Ye. 5- 1'4c waczt14O0sc ry ' 13G C- X(4000 -o TO 'TI-JG &r7T4-1 tom THG FOT tXrZc 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 1.00 . 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation: T}JC svvrH e'orevot, or= THIS 5( TG 140S f3GE#2 PfzG —W00Cr7 (.t.rIJ (=tU., THG RGnno)vJ (Z oP TuG Wate 12C-QVIRG P12c- l.000Et? 1r I LL 4LSO 13LE Oj2C CONSTCZVCqIbw7 l3EG S 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? ('c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- X X x (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: (b) 214444 t pram` -T uMA .444 -V s • 54/4" r " 44 eitcvu.: absoVp1ho+ Ya, of 1Prid444 A•40. . YES MAYBE NO 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:. . (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c)• Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d)' Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: (C) /4445411;41 L to ww witfk loud' C • 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: X • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous. substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X • • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: TNc F c.IL TV v.3 Cmpoor.?C nip re. G pCDPw 600 f3(ZIOG 71JC177 ? ra 71-1E ArzGA 4 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? )C Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation:( 'Pawl. dem1u 0'44 AMPP Qv► -sift. ce,) Zwcvw -t v4t U4 +ra-(h akfr4vmenhi a+' A tdt • plc. WWI: X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: - 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: YES MAYBE NO (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? • (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: lA4f0m • et.14 (pktifiNo �►ra}e.vT 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: x 18. Aesthetics. Explanation: Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or histor- ical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above infor- mation is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. AtzC(,I ITGGT JAN I S , 19'77 Signature and Title Date Project Name: WA ZG HOL9 G T -02 JGIZ/ZY ivy Project Address: ANOOL2GTz Peo►Z(C WGST BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS: 1. Date of Review: Building Planning Engineering Police Fire by: by: by: by: by: Check one ( +) or ( -) ( +) or ( -) CaL ( +) o (-) ( +) or ( -) ( +) or ( -) 2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official Date 3. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 759. ( +) ( -) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be done. Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not be done. BRANCH ASV .FWGGT2 IR'+ to• PARIGNG FUTUIZE. 9L WILL. CALL T. -.E.. :. . :...._.Tu =..Ict,... PRELIMINA2,y; - G,Ipg+ 4 : A-:}I Vls "� i =o FV2 .MILWAUICGI3.TL.GCttLIG WAtLCHOUSE i. FO2." JER2Y :IV!);.._ 4.3I9 .'11I .s. geATn7'W ICH `98;08 PHONE . (W).'G22`0900" • P2ELIMINA24 PLAT -!5 DONALD S. OLSON A2O- IITCGT' 3565 WEST MA2GINAI WALA S.U). SEATTLE : WASH 1 NG10N '.99106 PRONG - (12063 931 - 94O0 • _