HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-102 - MCCANN / PROJECT 452 - STORAGE YARD FILLMcCANN PROJECT 452
16700 W\TH
EPIC -FD -102
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
iliMMINIF
DECLARAT I Oil OF /1181ON -S I GN I F I CA JCE
Description of proposal Construction of a contractor's storage yard - 7,500 c.y. of
fill
Proponent Bruce E. McCann
800 feet south of the intersection of Strander Boulevard
Location of Proposal and the West Valley Highway on the east side of the West
Valley Highway.
Lead Agency O.C.D. Planning Division
File No EPIC -FD -102
This proposal has been determined to _ /not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS Ors not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Date
Fred Satterstrom
Associate Planner
24 May 1979
COMMENTS:
Signature
• 190$:
City •• f Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
433 -1845
Office of Community Development
21 February 1979
Mr. Ed. D. Hunt
McCann Const. Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 88314
Tukwila, WA
McCANN PROJECT #452
Dear Mr. Hunt:
In response to your letter of 16 February 1979, the procedure required under
W.A.C. 173 -14 -110 requires that the location, dimensions and elevations of any
proposed building be included in the application. General master application
such as the one issued to Southcenter South Industrial Park are no longer
approved of by the Department of Ecology.
Since the Washington Administrative Code is enforced by both the State and the
City of-Tukwila, the application must be considered either an incomplete appli-
cation for a Substantial Development Permit to fill and construct future commercial
buildings or a complete application for fill only with the future commercial build-
ings requiring additional Shorelines Substantial Development Permits.
The application as submitted is not specific enough to begin processing. A
clarification must be made by either limiting it to fill or providing additional
information concerning the location, dimensions, and elevations of the building.
Please respond prior to March 1st or I will return all the materials submitted.
Sincerely,
Roger J. Blaylock
Assistant Planner
RJB /ckh
cc: Ping. Sup.
CITY OF TUKWILA
E�J VIRO QUESTIONNAIRE REV I E�''FORM
�EP�TAL
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
g±(.F ; I t
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
z/z 79
(date)
(c-
( oO l3e
(revi ewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
L5/5//77
CITY OF TUKWILA gli
ENVIONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV LW FORM
PROJECT NAME:.
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
.5.;lhouy
14-
1. DEPARTM AL REVIEW:
Building:
0 Engineering:
C3 Fire:
C3 Planning:
0 Police:
Z/z.?
(1-tcca_vo- Prt 52)
6, 00
(date)
( 9? by:
by:
by:
by:
by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
(reviewer)
.....
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENV OA ;MENTAL QUEST I ONNA I RE RE/PEW FORM
6(005
PROJECT NAME: -ctou-ey Fdt (i-tccavo_ 15)
PROJECT ADDRESS: 4 0
_an 62 00 Up QA-IA
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 2,//2.?
I. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
Bu. by:
0 Fire:
Engineering: by:
by:
0 Planning: by:
O Police: by:
(date)
(reviewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
L,(4'
CITY OF TUKWILA ai
ENV IIIINMENTAL QUEST I °NFU I RE RE M.1.1 FORM
PROJECT NAME: g-t- t I pgt
1-tc C u_ 150
prey Fi ,
PROJECT ADDRESS: A1,4,0 An.dc. 1..Am. 00 U3 ca.A-
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
I. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
0 Building:
(date)
(reviewer)
by:
E neering: by:
Fire: 73761A--c-C / 9 9 9 by:
O Planning: by:
El Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
---ncr •
Alh CITY OF TUKWILA 4If
ENVMNMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: gtouey f4c. f)
A
PROJECT ADDRESS: A mitZ. 0
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: Cli/z? 7'
I. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
C7 Building:
0 Engineering:
0 Fire: ,
C7 P nning:
Police:
(date)
1
( 00 u0 (ad
7?o0).
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
LLG
(reviewer)
by:
by:
by:
by:
by: P-
• •
EXHIBIT .A
L C-- /,/2
That portion of the South 990 feet of
the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4
in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,
lying East of the West Valley Road and lying West of
the Puget Sound Electric Railway right of way and lying
North of the following described line:
Beginning at the center of said Section 25;
thence West along the center line of said Section 25 a
distance of 897.56 feet to an intersection with the
center line of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and
Union Pacific Railroad right of way;
thence southerly along said railroad center line
517.40 feet;
thence North 46 °27'30" West to the Westerly line of
said Puget Sound Electric Railway right of way
as condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 32873;
thence continuing North 46 °27'30" West . to the Easterly
line of the West Valley Road;
thence Northerly along said Easterly line 460 feet to the
true point of beginning of the line herein described;
thence East to the Westerly line of the Puget Sound Electric
Railway right of way and of said line description;
Situate in the City of Tukwila, _County of King, State of
Washington.
• EXHIBIT "E"
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire'must be c completed by all persons applying for a permit
from the City-of .Tukwi l a,', unl ess i t As determined by. the-Responsible Official
that the permit is exempt or unless'the applicant and Responsible Official
previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be 'completed.
I. BACKGROUND .-
1. Name of Proponent:. B. E.:McCann (Trustee).
•
2. Address and Phone .Numberof Proponent:.; '- 950`Andover Park 'East, : Tukwila,
Washington 98188.'.: Telephone:. 575 -4330
•
3. Date Checklist Submitted: October 30, 1978
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila Building Department
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Stoneway Fill Site
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal".(including but-not limited to
its size., general design elements, and other-factors that wilt give an ac-
curate understanding of..its scope and nature):
Fill existing low areas up.to approximate street grade. See.:attached
legal description attached as Exhibit "A ".
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, in-
cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of
the environmental setting of the proposal): .
The site is 1.57 acres, approximately 760' frontage located on the east
side of West Valley Highway,_. The.. site is generally low and flat covered
with tall native--grasses .interspersed. with isolated spruce and..cottonwood trees
. of small size. , -: j,
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal:. • November - ,19.80
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local)
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
X
(c) Building permit YES NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit
(e) Sewer hook up permit
(f) Sign permit
YES NO X
YES • NO X
YES NO X
(g) Water hook up permit YES NO X
(h) Storm water system permit* YES . N0 X
(i) Curb cut permit YES -NO X
(j) - Electrical permit (State of Washington). YES_`: NO X
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO _I
(1) Other:
10. Do you.have any plans for future additions,.expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? - If yes, explain:
It is contemplated, upon completion of fill to gravel and fence the area to
"establish a storage yard for construction equipment and job trailers, .at the
north end of the •ro•ert . To- •. o -•• • o- • ••- •Hip - ial
venture.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may .affect .the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form thathas..been completed regarding the pro -
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some - future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
None
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "
s" and "maybe" answers are required)
•
1.• Earth. Will *the- proposal: result in:::
Unstable earth-conditions. or in changes In geologic
substructures?
(b) .Disruptions, displacements, .compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
• (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea
tures? ..
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
X
•
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of .soils;
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion.of beach 'sands, o
changes-in siltation,' deposition or erosion which.;
may ..modi fy " the ..channel of -a river or stream or the.
.bed of. the ocean or any-bay, inlet or lake ?.
Explanation: " The' site will be filled with imported:material . to
the approximate grade of West Valley Highway...
•
YES MAYBE NO
X
Air: : Wi 1, l.. the. ,proposal resul t.. i n:..:
) Air. emissi�ns or deterioration of ambient
'quality?
"(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally? •
Explanation:
either
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow. of .flood Waters ?"
(d) Change in..;the.dmount of surface water in any water. •
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any.alteration
of surface water quality, including but.not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters ?.
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawal, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
X
X
X
-.3-
X
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, .or other substances into the
ground:waters?
Reduction in the amount of .water otherwise avail-.
able for public water supplies?
- Explanation:
L
Ponding "in low lying depressions.will.be.eliminated.
:Flora. Will the proposal result in::
Change in the diversity of species, numbers:
of any species of flora (including-trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of.. flora?
.
Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
YES MAYBE NO
Ad) Reduction in acreage .of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
. Will the proposal: result in:
Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles,.fish and shellfish,.benthie
organisms, insects or :tnicrofauna)?
) Reduction of the numbers of any :unique, rare or
endangered species ,of fauna?
) Introduction of . new species of fauna, into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife.
habitat?
X
Explanation:
•
The site provides habitat for common small birds and
mammals typical of partially developed suburban areas. Approximately
1.5 acres of this habitate will-be lost-. No fare or endangered species of
unusual wildlife. _n_
X
X
•
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
7:.
Explanation:
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera -. -
tioh of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
The land will change from undeveloped land to potential. .
commercial development. The present zoning designates the •
site commercial use. The proposal.is consistent with zoning
and land use planning. ,
9. Natural Resources.' -Will the proposal result in:
. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
•'resources?
Depletion of any nonrenewable natural.
resource?
10 .Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous,
substances (including,: but not limited.::
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
-5- '
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area ?.
• Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
12. Housing: Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
X
X
Transportation /Circulation. t i l the proposal result i
Generation of additional vehicular movement?
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
Impact upon
Alterations
or movement
Alterations
existing transportation systems?
to present patterns of circulation
of people and /or goods?
to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or. pedestrians?
Explanation: The amount of additional traffic generated will
be insignificant.
.14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
•
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
X
X
(f) Other governmental services?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:.
•
(a) Use of substantial 'amounts of fuel ,or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation::
16: Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas ?.
(b) Communications systems ?.
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal. ?.
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal-result in ,the crea
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard.(excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the.proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view ?'
Explanation:..
19. Recreation.
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
Will the proposal result in an impact..
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
X
O. Archeological /Histroical Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
c . 6 /27,
Signature and Title Date
X