The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-105 - MA SEGALE - 8,496 SF SEGALE SHOP EXPANSIONSEGALE SHOP ADDITION 18801 SOUTHCENTER PY EPIC-FD- 1 U5 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /FINAL /NON- SIGNIFICAJCE DECLARATION OF Description of proposal A 118'x 72' (8,496 sq. ft.) addition to existing shop Proponent Mario A. Segale, Inc. Location of Proposal 18801 Southcenter Parkway Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No EPIC -FD -105 This proposal has been determined to 0111I/not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (t /is not) required under. RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor for Position /Title Date 31 May 1979 Signature Kjell Stoknes, O.C.D. Director COMMENTS: M. A. SEGALE, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS August 16, 1979 Mr. Kjell Stoknes O.C.D. Director City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 puG 2 3 1919 RE: Building Permit Application - Shop Property Extension. Dear Mr. Stoknes: This is to confirm that when Southcenter Parkway is realigned and widened, our outside storage and truck parking on the subject property will be properly screened per presently existing T.M.C. Section 18.40.010(39). Very truly yours, M. A. SEGALE , INC. M. A. Segale President MASlpb P.O. BOX 88050 • 18010 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 • TEL = PHONE: (206) 575 -3200 An equal opportunity employer CITY OF TUKWILA � • QUESTIONNAIRE r� � • FORM ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE. REVIEW PROJECT NAME: 5E6 f.;/#0f PROJECT ADDRESS: / e 81),/ S C. Ae,46.47 DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: S/ 7/7 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) 2/Building: ' 1 / 1 4 2 1 - /97 by: (V)g4- ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: bY: ❑.Police: by: 770f9% • 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: gbr- C am-„ ✓-c- CITY OF TUKWILA • ff0 /9 SOP ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM A 46 sS?„,70,t4\‘, PROJECT NAME: 5g &1- 4E SffaP �9p,UZ'TZ Wt./ �cR'�° PROJECT ADDRESS: / 6 ! S C� �aR /l4.,aY DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: S1'% 7f 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑.Building: � by: L'/ 0' -� Engineering: 2tw �ZI j77 by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑. Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: tvoN CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONdAIRE REVIEW, FORM PROJECT NAME: S 2'TZOAS PROJECT ADDRESS: / 8 0/ S.C. AAIVCwa y DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 57/17/47, 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: O Engineering: by: L� Fire: s—ZL�79 by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑. Police: by: . 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: CITY OF TUKWILA 7 (9/9 ENVIRONMENTAL OUESTIO'JNAIRE REVI W FORM PROJECT NAME: 5.1 E SAL-0/a A}va-2-T -ZOA) • PROJECT ADDRESS: / 68 / S. C - Pairf w ar DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: );//!//4? 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: Et/Police: M1A`f 27-- 111/() by: • 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: O.C.D. CITY Of TU ^ ";:u+ r\\--\_W\P ff 0 MAY Z 3 1979 RECEIVED III ` ary OF /UKWILA CITY OF TUKWILA 79°/(7 __ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 14"fl ' 1 BUILDING DEPT. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for. permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: M. A. SEGALE, INC. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 18010 Southcenter Parkway;. P. O. Box 88050, Tukwila, Washington 98188 575 -3200 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Off. Comm. Devel. - Bldg. Div. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: M. A. Segale, Inc. - Shop Addition 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors_that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 118' X 72' addition to existing shop building. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Building located at 18801 Southcenter Parkway (at southerly city limits). To the south is a construction equipment storage area. Site it presently a shop facility. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: August 1, 1979 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x (b) King County Hydraulics. Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES x NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit - YES NOX (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NOx (f) Sign permit YES NOx (g) Water hook up permit YES NOx (h) Storm water system permit YES NOx (i) Curb cut permit YES NOx (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NOx (1) Other: None 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: None at this time. Li. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? - If yes, explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: N/A II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- eV YES MAYBE NO , • • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in silt4tion, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? -.__- (b) The-.creation'of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air-movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? -- Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 3: Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? — (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? — (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? x (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? x Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X (g) -3- • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? x (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers - of-any species of-flora (including trees, shrubs, _._grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d)- Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: - x x x 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x Explanation: • • YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or-planned land use of an area? Explanation: x x 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: x 11. Population. Explanation: • • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) -Effects-on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: (e) (f) in: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO x x • • (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO x x x x x x x x x Explanation: Washington Natural Gas will extend main on Southcenter Parkway to serve facility in lieu of propane. Puget Power will remove existing metered service and install new primary service to serve facility. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x Explanation: • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or.his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. AI4.Sey -4/ Signature and Title e :x x x