HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-106 - MCCANN / PROJECT 425 - 68,404 SF WAREHOUSEMcCANN PROJECT 425
EPIC-FD- 106
;.McCann Project #425
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATION OF iNON -S I GN I F I CA JCE
Description of proposal Multi - Tenant Spec. Warehouse (68,404 Square feet)
Proponent William E. Boeing
Location of Proposal Lots 5 & 8, Upland's Tukwila Industrial Park
Lead Agency City of Tukwila /Building Division File No EPIC -FD -106
This proposal has been determined to 011111/hot have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS (111/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Date
Fred N. Satterstrom
Associate Planner
6 June 1979
COMMENTS:
Signature
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIF MENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVi
PROJECT NAME: H Cl¢A) L 425
PROJECT ADDRESS: 0/3/a `�livc.
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FIL1ING: 5/3 t2 ,/7 f
79021
FORM
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
Building: j12eti6 j. / 777 by: lX� ��i
❑ Engineering: v by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
Cl . Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
rr CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIP 'MENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REAll FORM
PROJECT NAME: Pc C, A) Pie -- -cr '4 /Z5
PROJECT 'ADDRESS: (Jw /0 aid -DR� uC
DATE ACCEPTED FOR. FILING: 5/30A,
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
❑ Byilding: by:
Engineering: by: 6(<
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑_ Police: by:
7?1,2!
(date) (reviewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRO, MEi1TAL QUESTIOVN'AIRE REVIE; FORM
PROJECT NAME: idtk CAS 0 • PE0 -' &CT 44 4125
PROJECT ADDRESS: p rau
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: S/3 D1:7/
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
�❑ Engineering: 9 by:
gi tire: 6- 7 / 7 by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑. Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKIWWII_A •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORS 1
PROJECT NAME: l�'(c C1/01) Pe o iJ tGT • 414123
PROJECT ADDRESS: Op d 1,e7u e,
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: ;/i0?
7Verz r
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by
❑ Planning: by:
Police: S— S I — % y by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
• •
QUESTION 13
A survey of similar multi — tenant warehouse complexes in the immediate vicinity discloses;
1. Greatly increased traffic, pedestrian and vehicle.
2. Inadequate parking for employees, visitors and business contacts.
3. Additional traffic flowing into Andover West at an uncontrolled intersection.
QUESTION 14
1. Additional traffic related responsibilities.
2. Extension of exisiting patrol boundaries.
3. Increased calls for police services based upon increased populatdon.
EXPLANATION B — Exisitng high standard of security services mentioned do
Envoirmental Checklist has resulted in 703 false alarms during the calander
year, 1978. These call for services represent a time lost from patrol of
approx 1 manhour per false alarm or 703 manhours per year.
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
6a Rzet, Boo Vwtiro
O.C.D.
CITY OF TUKW.ILA
79021
MAY 3 0 1979
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent:
William E. Boeing
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1411 Fourth Avenue Building,
Se;..'e, Washington 98101 - phone -682 -7760
3. Date Checklist Submitted: May 29T 1979
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: -Pu l.d.ing=an Planning.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Upland's Tukwila Industrial Park Project 425.
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Project #425 is a 68,404 S.F. multi -tenant spec. warehouse on a 147,593 S.F.
site, all located in the western portion ot the Upland ' s. Tukwila Industrial Park.
The access is from Uplands Drive at the cul de sac. A. secondary access is also
provided by an existing private cul de sac proposed to be named Midlands Drive.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
The site is presently undeveloped and. supports no vegetation due to the
placement ot dirt till trom adjacent construction developments by the same
owner.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal:
December, 1979
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
(c) Building permit YES X NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YESx NO
al 0
(f) Sign permit YESx NO
(g) Water hook up permit YESx NO
(h) Storm water system permit YESx NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YESx NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YESx NO
(1) Other: Develop plans have been filed with King County
Hydraulics for their records and information.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:-
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
City of Tukwila Planning Commission - Site Plan Approved.
City of Tukwila Building Permit - Filed.
City of Tukwila Board of Architectural Review - Landscape Plan to be filed.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? x
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? X _
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? X
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
x
•
Explanation to Item II.
lb. Site grading will involve some repositioning of soil on
the site and any unsuitable excavated material will be
.hauled away. Any necessary structural fill will be
imported onto the site.
Construction of the building and parking lot will
compact and overcover such areas of soil with an
impervious surface.
3h. Construction will result in increased impermeable
surfaces and corresponding insignificant reduction in
ground water recharge. Drainage patterns within the
site would not be significantly altered.
2a
•
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? x
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? X
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
x
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? _
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
x
body? _
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
(f) Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? x
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? x
-3-
•
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
x
x
x
•
YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels? x
Explanation: The project would generate a temporary increase
in noise during construction. Following construction, there .
would be an insignificant increase in noise due to additional
vehicular traffic.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation: Interior and exterior sources of lighting would
be added to the site. The lighting has been designed to
avoid spilling onto adjacent streets or properties.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
' tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
x
YES MAYBE NO
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area? x
Exo lanktiQBusiness work hours activity•will he given
an insigni._i.cant increase due to this v: rehouse' buildirng in an
area that currently supports a large similar distribution
warehouse use.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing? x
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f)
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation: a) There would be an insignificant increase
in traffic on Uplands Drive and Andover Park West.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
x
x
x
x
•
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? x
Explanation: a) The building will he protected by an automatic
Fire Protection Sprinkler System.:_-
b) Past experience has indicated ' sorie ,tenants install:.and::maintain_:their
own security services to a high standard and demand for Public Police
Services will not be significant.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
x
x
(a) Power or natural gas? x
(b) Communications systems? x
(c) Water? x
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? x
(e) Storm water drainage? x
(f) Solid waste and disposal? x
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
-7-
.;- :., ;(T :9-(vobi Qc .
x
• •
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
n151.1 7 " ' rfensi've 2s i te=open°to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist -
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Agent for Proponent May 29, 1979
_Signature and Title
MCann Constru.^ticn Co. Inc.
.950 .761dover._ Park. East_
Seattle, Washington .98188
-8-
Date
x
x
•
EXHIBIT A
•
McCann Projects
le
1:••••11. • t•
014.
, ••••,..,..• Pur R..
. 1.,•,..........r. ........,.. . . . .....,................
, 4 ::::-...:.-'--...4•_-_-_...-- • .. ---.1:-.— 1-4 1-
PLANO
;.'1-1.::171:11.''. ?.(c7... 1)‘I ::17:::::=L::.i.;"-P — — - - - - - — -- ---t—TI .
T-
1 L 1
777.1 i -:11 II
• -_-- I
• 7. / //'.2
. • . '
i, /./.'
' ' • , /
k
noir
111111111Iii
111.1_1_1_1.1.1111 rj
" \
±/1 I11 Milli 'II
) ttil•■■-■•
•,‘
I \\\
• it-11-11111.111
MIDLAND I:1141VA
L
L. La., 1 01.6.,-
... V/..
- pw..t Pvlsaul
up' •1■•
r•Irfle.
-
4.4".■
\
Olt-19,1M
Si 4.
,••••••-•.,
no,
••• ■■••••.../
• • .11
.1•
•
t 4-
z. e.
.• • O., .1,1,-1.0i
I
•
/ tot-
3
f=1) Li M M
. .n.11 ti.Z.
ESLJIL.00,161 • Z
Arce,z,
r,oL204,
ef ■■■ at)
PAP-K-11461 tyf
- I
r•,•-• •
C...71" . •
/
F.J24.
I.. .".•
f;;•••;:sIS\
T.
i?_.- (?) _ • •
--••■•
"14 t
c1)
(1)
.1111 t
ue,.... 111.1.r••• %••••/...1,011
71
! •
,---t 'r atm.
•-• • ■•• 0.•
Cri)
r/...,./VC.
V. {AVIV;
l_tati; ''•-7-7
5UILtIkJ1
trt
(c (4:) (;;'
•
Jl
t14.
h:114
•
- 1- -
4. 4.• I..
• •
•
E..- R. I OP- 1-7:-
•
A.11.11t. it t.. ..• • • •
' •
- [I,:
.. - -
• ___,
it-
-,...i. or
e....•1-0•17
'
c,...".......,•
(rye V,.
.__ •
r•-•,..m...S - •
• / ..r...)
•
W... l.f.......,/ i• -
.
.-1
.
. ,
l_
.4
4—..._
,
,
rxr-•••. L. —..1.
•
I_
l_tati; ''•-7-7
5UILtIkJ1
trt
(c (4:) (;;'
•
Jl
t14.
h:114
•
- 1- -
4. 4.• I..
• •
•
E..- R. I OP- 1-7:-
•
A.11.11t. it t.. ..• • • •
' •
- [I,:
it-
—
l_tati; ''•-7-7
5UILtIkJ1
trt
(c (4:) (;;'
•
Jl
t14.
h:114
•
- 1- -
4. 4.• I..
• •
•
E..- R. I OP- 1-7:-
•
A.11.11t. it t.. ..• • • •