HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-108 - WESTCOAST FREEHOLDS - 31,400 SF SOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE BUILDINGSOUTHCENTER CORPORATE
SQUARE OFFICE BUILDING
EPIGFD -108
McCann Project #477
BCS Office Building
Corporate Square
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
/FINAL
DECLARATION OF /NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal Office Building (31,400 gross square feet)
Proponent
Westcoast Freeholds
Location of Proposal Southwest corner of Southcenter Corporate Square located on
Andover Park West.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila /Building Division File No EPIC -FD -108
This proposal has been determined to (111111/not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS ( /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Date
Fred N. Satterstrom
Associate Planner
6 June 1979
COMMENTS:
Signature
CITY OF TUKWILA m6
ENVIRMEi1TAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVTcY FORM
PROJECT NAME: RC CAPS 1177 C (ACS 00. ?P-
PROJECT ADDRESS: C orea -Fe- < ue SThOcitli
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 5/30/97
7 ?oz 3
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
B BMEui1ding: 'W- /7 7 by: G e.6FkA ?'...J
❑ Engineering: / by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑.Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVI!JMEf1TAL QUESTIO'JNAIRE REfV1 FORM
PROJECT NAME: \ tic C i -v Ili '41 7 l ('c5
1I �
PROJECT ADDRESS: Co ep of of 'DReoe Solo
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: S 3 D/7?
7 ?023
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: 1, by:
Engineering: �'7 by:
by: 97
C3 Fire: Y:
❑ Planning: by:
❑.Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
4
PROJECT NAME: J1I c, C / ») #6977 ` 6Cs D
PROJECT ADDRESS: G pee prey e— Sou
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: • S /30/7?
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
O Building: by:
❑Engineering: by:
U�'ire: 6-- 7' 79 by: ,
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
79° C3
(revi ewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVI RONMEr1TAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: MC. C AN N) 1-1177. ('cs'
PROJECT ADDRESS: C p( la 0eccf'e_ e. Sou
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: r/-9°P?
�Qoe3
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
Q/Police: 3 - 7 9 by:
(revi ewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
17 .
QUESTION 13
An examination of similar office complexes in the immediate Brea discloses:
1. Greatly increased traffic, pedestrian and vehicle.
2. Inadequate parking to accomodate employees, visitors and business contacts.
3. Additional traffic flow into Andover West at an uncontrolled intersection.
QUESTION 14
1. Additional traffic related responsibilities.
2. Extension of present patrol areas.
3. Increased calls for service resulting from the increased population.
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
RECEIVED
O.C.D.
Cmr OF TUKWILA
790e3
MAY; V 0 1979
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Westcoast Freeholds
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1900 -777 Hornby Street
Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 1A7
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
5 -29 -79
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Building and Planning.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:. Southcenter Corporate Square, Building 11,
(McCann Project 477)
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Single two(2) story office structure of approximately 31,400 SF gross
floor area together with parking for 144 cars and landscaping.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
The site is located at approximately 700 Andover Park West on 160,244 SF
area situated at the southern end of a 19 acre parcel collectively known
as Southcenter Corporate Square. The site represents the balance of the
L0Lal part-e Lemdlning after segregations of Farce 1, 2, 3, and 4 wnich
support buildings 1 through 10. The site currently has a landscaped parking
luL Lui 153 di�i,W�li'h occu le he eastern section and the entire parcel is
, (continued on pa e .La)
8; Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: October 1979.
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
(c) Building permit YES X NO
• •
Attachment to Environmental Check List
7. bounded on the south by a 30' reservation for utilities
and railaord right of way.
The undeveloped portion of the site representing approximately
75000 SF supports some dirt fill accumulated from construction
activity on the entire 19 acre parcel over the last two years.
The ground cover consists of very sparse grass and weeds and
about 5 small cottonwood trees. Access to the site is by
Corporate Drive South which is an existing facility and
currently being dedicated to the City of Tukwila by the owner.
There is no access permitted to this section of the entire
parcel from Andover Park West. (Reference Binding Site approval
plan). The properties to the south and west are partially
developed office and warehouse distribution facilities respectively.
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO
(f) Sign permit YES x _NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES X NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES X NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES x NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO
(1) Other: Development plans have been filed with King County
Hydraulics for their records and information.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
Expansion by construction of an additional building on this section of
the entire parcel is feasible but no plates are env L coned in the
immediate future.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
B.S.I.P. - completed.
City of Tukwila Building Permit - filed.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes and "maybe" answers are required
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical. features?
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
x
x
e
x
X
• •
Explanation to Item II.�
lb. Site grading will involve some repositioning of soil on
the site and any unsuitable excavated material will be
hauled away. Any necessary structural fill will be
imported onto the site.
Construction of the building and parking lot will
compact and overcover such areas of soil with an
impervious surface.
3b. Construction will result in increased impermeable
surfaces and corresponding insignificant reduction in
ground water recharge. Drainage patterns within the
wite would not be significantly altered.
2a
• •
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
YES MAYBE NO
x
x
x
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? X
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3-
x
X
• •
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
• of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO.
x
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels ?'
YES MAYBE NO
xplanation: The project would generate a temporary increase
in noise during construction. Following construction, there
wouldebe an insignificant increase in noise due to additional
vehicular traffic.'
x
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new x
light or glare?
FF aaI1 tt 0o Interior and exterior sources of lighting would
bep addedc.to the site. The lighting has been designed to
avoid spilling onto adjacent streets or properties.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
• •
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation: Business work hours activity will be given
an insignificant increase due to this office building in an
areaathat currently supports a large similar office use.
YES MAYBE NO
x
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing? x
Explanation:
13. 'Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation: a) There would be an insignificant increase
in traffice on Andover Park West.
c) It is anticipated that use of this facility will increase
the trend for some occupants to use the existing public bus
service.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
x
x
x
x
x
x
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? x
Explanation: a) The building will be protected by an automatic
fire protection sprinkler system.
b) The tenant for this building will be the Boeing Computer Services and
past experience has indicated this tenant installs and maintains its' own
security services to a high standard and demand for Public Police Services
will not be significant.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy? x
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations tu the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d). Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
x
• •
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any . declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Agent for Proponent May 29, 1979
Signature and Title
McCann Construction Company, Inc. \ - E. D. Hunt
950 Andover Park East
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Phone - 575 -4330 -8-
Date
X
x
x
•
Latdiv.a_ al/it V, cy-r
PT
) 1, , ) ( n 1:
r
1.444444r4 4.4rr..4
-,444 1,4*
oei d .11.
1.
OD 1
0 10 TO
1
40
ea
)
1
SITE PLAN
SITE AREA 160.244 as
BLDG. AREA crioss 31.4081.1
PARKINGINEXT TO BLDG. 145 STALLS
11111■■••■•■
I, 2l6 .•
EXISTING LOT 153 scuLs