HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-109 - POMERANZ TOM - TUKWILA 600 BUILDINGTUKWILA 600 BUILDING
VIINKLER & APW
EPIC -FD -109
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
/FINAL
DECLARATION OF 1111.11. 'NON - SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal Tukwila 600 Building
Proponent Tom Pomeranz
Location of Proposal Minkler Blvd. and Andover Park West
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No EPIC - 109 -FD
This proposal has been determined to (Iilli/not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS III/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes
Position /Title 0.C.D. Director
tfr-5-441"4.4414
Date June 25, 1979 Signature
COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA 4
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
1
PROJECT NAME: / (9 dO it I ,+ `
PROJECT ADDRESS: (90(7 grvAA a /% Lk)e°.
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: )/9 L%(, /979
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
Ly' Building: 8//g79 by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑.Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
/v C Ai 6/-'TS
Date:
To:
PLANNING DIVISION - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TRANSMITTAL
ATT:
Project:
/14 9(2...4: 07?
Building Division
Fire Department
Public Works Department
Other
/.J4iL P,lr boo ,3
Applicant:
/,
, t -,ad
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for
the above referenced project:
"' nvironmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat
0 Environmental Impact Statement 0 Final Plat
Site /Development Plans ❑ Rezone Request
❑ Shoreline Permit Application ❑ Variance Request
❑ Conditional Use Permit Application ❑ Other:
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning
Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com-
plete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or, if needed, attach a
separate sheet.
Requested response da
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Review Department comments:
By:
Date:
PROJECT NAME:
. ,
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT ADDRESS: (90O f },A, mod- 1701 Wut-
.
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: /'AC 9t.tr.t / ? 99'
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
,❑Building: by:
L7 / Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
Date:
PLANNING I VISION - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY
TRANSMITTAL
9L1A4..-'
To: El Building Division
❑ Fire Department
Public Works Department
❑ Other
ATT : /46/k.(' TR:�ct y�t,P,10.1.— - e .
,GtAwiee 67 O O
Project:
Applicant:
DEVELOPMENT
Cd-cilvt.Dt.f.1 e RA.tZ Pe
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the'
the above referenced project:
El/Environmental Checklist
❑ Environmental Impact Statement
Site /Development Plans
❑ Shoreline Permit Application
fl Conditional Use Permit Application
0
following plans or materials for
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Rezone Request
Variance Request
Other:
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning
Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com-
plete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or, if needed, attach a
separate sheet.
Requested response dat
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Review Department comments:
PZb i (b Vg ILI rw OVA 4J '10' I .C..l s S OVE4o i IM 1 N I. LNk Z LV (
N o�.
vas Plmrr o Vilvf oP)A vaT- rto 12gN VOJk3 cs)-- y E--g11.4siv
krtnv 1C-)TT Lei c)-i v AN0V .. .t. - /'rrw'T- sua-Ata
wtirot •IS caAmp
By: Date: 6/(c1/27
CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE . REVIEW FORD]
PROJECT NAME: J (900 Le
PROJECT ADDRESS: & 0C 14✓n.oL -ut.A!, Wi• —
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: m 9 l???.
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
❑ Building: by:
❑,, Engineering: by:
IYFre: r /5-7 f by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑. Police: by:
(reviewer)
•
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
PLANNING 1PI VISION — OFFICE OF COMMUNI DEVELOPMENT
TRANSMI,TTA.
Date: /I(
To: II Building Division
Fire Department
0 Public Works Department
0 Other'
ATT : C*eo w
Project: / OM by:CA/9
Applicant:
60 o TA19,
�]1de,vovi C.ac al 4P. /eux.,e 17"Z19-
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for
the above referenced project:
Environmental Checklist ED Preliminary Plat - •
Environmental Impact Statement f Final Plat
Site /Development Plans Rezone Request
0 Shoreline Permit Application Ei Variance Request.
0 Conditional Use Permit Application 0 Other:
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning
Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com-
plete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or, if needed, attach a
separate sheet.
Requested response d =te:
Review Department comm -sts:
By:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Date:
/I-79
•
CITY OF T U KW I !_A
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
00
boo PaA4 tu)e
19.??'
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ PPlanning: by:
12. Police: ` `CAflk_ 1e by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
#7 — In establishing hours for parking and entryway lighting, consideration should
be gived to the staffing hours of tenants. Tenants maintaining staffs on a 16
or 24 hour basis have lighting needs and priorities much the same as those on
a routine day shift.
#13 a. The addition of_19,886 S.F. of office space, where there is now a vacant lot,
will most definitely increase traffic to the specific location and in the area
in general.
b. How many persons will staff the building? Will 81 parking stalls be sufficient
to meet the needs of tenants, staff, and visitors?
c. Entry and exit of vehicles will have a slowing effect on existing traffic
patterns on Andover West.
f. The addition of 75 ot more vehicles on exisitng traffic has to impact the present
accident rate in the immediate area. Vehicles turning left fmom the southbound
lane and crossing northbound traffic, and vehicles exiting the parking area
pose a particular hazard.
#14 b. Proposed building plan will effect existing Police patrols by expanding the
patrol coverage to be provided by the District car. The increase in commercial
population (tenants and staff) will resulting in a corresponding increase in
calls for police services.
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
O.C.D.
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM f?De
'JUN 14 1979
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Ridenour, Cochran, & Lewis, AIA
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 454 -2074
1715 114th Av. S.E., Suite 212, Bellevue, WA 98004
3. Date Checklist Submitted: June 13, 1979
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Department
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Tukwila 600 Building
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
See attached sheet.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
See attached sheet.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Winter 1980
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES x NO
(c) Building permit YES x NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO ?c
(e) Sewer hook up permit YESx NO
cp
(f) Sign permit
YESx NO
(g) Water hook up permit YESx NO
(h) Storm water system permit YESx NO
(i) Curb cut permit YESx NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YESx NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YESx NO
(1) Other: 'Tukwila Planning Commission, Board of Arch itPcbi.tal
Review and the Andover Park Architectural Control commit -tee
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
no
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
no
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro -
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
none
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? x
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
x
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
x
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES: MAYBE NO
x
Explanation:
b:.) :Compaction of fill is required for slab on grade.
Fill is required only to level out existing fill
that is presently on the site.
c.) The addition of paved parking areas will change surface
release feature.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? x
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? x
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? x
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3-
x
x
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
b.) Because_of the addition of more asphalt parking there
will be less absorption and more surface water runoff.
g.) Storm drainage as required by Tukwila Public Works.
i.) Reduction by normal office use of restrooms & landscape
sprinkler. system.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? x
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? x
x
x
x
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
x
x
Explanation:
a.) There mi ht be a small change ip the diversity or numbers of banthic
benthic Organisms, insects or microfauna due to the project, but no
change in birds, land animals, fish or reptiles.
-4-
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? x
Explanation: The addition of new parking lot lighting will have a minimal
impact because of the existing lights now on the site. The building
will also produce minimal illumination at night when the interior lights
are turned on (e.g. winter months).
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
' tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
x
x
Explanation:
a.) Building will use electricity as power source and water for
hygiene, maintenance, lawn care, and refreshment.
b.) The use of petroleum products will be used for the production,
delivery, and construction of the building products.
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion. or the release of.hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
a.) The increase of office space may generate more traffic.
b.) The parking proposed meets the city's requirements plus
adds 16 more stalls to compensate for the removal of
16 -20 existing paved stalls on the site.
.reson l tegvps ve minimal. 14. PublicServicc.Wi hpros a la an erreCt. up0
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
YES MAYBE NO
x
(a) Fire protection? x
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
x
x
• •
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? x
Explanation:
The proposal may need the services of the loca Fire Department
and Police Department in the event of a fire or personal emergency.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
x
Explanation:
The project will use electricity for heat, a.c•. and power, but
not of the size that would require development of new sources.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
x
(a) Power or natural gas? x
(b) Communications systems? x
(c) . Water? x
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? x
(e) Storm water drainage? x
(f) Solid waste and disposal? x
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
x
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
.the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Mark L. Nelson (Architect);
7/1"4„/A9?-'
June 13, 1979
Signature and Title Date
x
x
•
RIDENOUR, COCHRAN & LEWIS AIA ARCHITECTS
J
1715 114th Avenue S.E. /Suite 212 /Bellevue, Washington 98004/454 -2074
June 13, 1979
City of Tukwila
Environmental Checklist Form
Project: Tukwila 600 Building
#6 NATURE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
The proposal is the construction of a two story 19,886 s.f. office
building with paved off - street parking for 81 cars. The building
:exterior will.be of architectural concrete columns and spandrel panels
with either reflective glass or bronze solar glass windows wrapping
almost continuously around each floor. Reflective glass block will
be used at each entry to allow diffused natural light to illuminate
the stairways. The flat roof will house the main heating and air
conditioning unit and will be screened from public site by the use
of baked enamel steel panels and concrete parapet walls. The
building steps back 2 feet per floor from the roof line, thereby
allowing for more landscaping around the building.
#7 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
The project is located in the Andover Industrial Park on the east
side of Andover Park west approximately 300 ft. north of Minkler
Boulevard. It is bounded by the "UPS" parking lot to the north,
railroad tracks to the east, office /warehouse space to the south
and the Southcenter Corporate Square to the west. The lot is
presently vacant except for a small concrete block shelter which
will be removed. The east portion of the lot has been filled in
the past and has been paved for a parking area. The west portion
has 2 -3 ft. of fill on the north and south thirds of the property.
An access road exists through the unfilled portion. Flora, except
for weeds, is non - existent on the site as for larger species of fauna.
/lb