The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-111 - TRILAND CORPORATION / PROJECT 468 - KAWNEER BUILDINGKAWNEER BLDG PROJECT 468 1210 APE EPIC -FD -111 • • CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /FINAL DECLARATION OF 111111•11M1/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Project #468 /Kawneer Building Addition Proponent Triland Corporation Location of Proposal 1210 Andover Park East, Tukwila Lead Agency City of. Tukwila File No EPIC -FD -111 This proposal has been determined to (1115/not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (11/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Kjell Stoknes, Director, Office of Community Development Signature COMMENTS: CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM : CITY OF TUKWILA . This questionnaire must be completed by all persons,applying for a permit, 'from the City of ::Tukwila,'. unless it is ;determined by the Responsible .'Official that the permit is exempt orunless'the applicant and Responsible :Official previously agree an. Environmental Impact: Statement needs to be completed-. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent; 4. '- Triland.Corporation Address:and Phone Number of Proponent :.: .Seattle,. - Washington'. 98101..' : 6827760 Suite' 1.120, 1411 4th Avenue Date Checklist Submitted: June 26-, 1979 Agency Requiring Checklist: Building and .Planning 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Kawneer Building Addition 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (includi.ng.but not 'Limited t-o its size, general design elements, and other factors that will'g'ive an ac- curate understanding -of its scope and'nature): Project 468 is a building addition of 15,120. SF to'an existing facility known as the Kawneer Building. This addition represents a.38 %.expansion of:the original tloor area.. The property-boundaries and access to- existing streets and utilities remain unchanged by this addition. Provision of this. building expansion-was incorporated" into the original planning and design. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the. physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts'; :in -. cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understa.ndingof the environmental setting of the proposal): The present Kawneer Building addiess is 1210 Andover Park East, and.fis .a.:,f ully developed site with the exception of the expansion area. The addition will be used by an existing tenant with the possibility of.some sub -lease warehouse space. . 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: December 1979 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for. the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X • (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES- - NO X. (c) Building permit YES- X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit . (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit. (i) Curb cut. permit . . (j) Electrical permit (State. :of .Washington) -(k) Plumbing.permit (King County) (1) Other: --YES NO X YES "X NO YES X NO ..: YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO ,YES X NO YES X NO 10. Do•you.have any plans. for. future additions, expansion, or father activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain::. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect.the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application. form that.has been completed:regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed.'at some future_ date,. describe. the nature- of'such application form: City. of.Tukwila Planning.. Commission City of :Tukwila Building . Permia. City-of Tukwila:.Board of Architectural Review II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all '' s and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will .the .proposal result in (a)`. Unstable earth..conditions.:or..in changes in geol'ogi :c. substructures? (b) JlisruptiOndisplacemen ts; compaction or.overcover -- .ing of the soil?. (c) Change in topography or ground-surface relief fea- tures? . (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ' -2- YES •.MAYBE NO 1 (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or. off the site? YES MAYBE NO x Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition o r erosion which may modify the channel of a ri ver: or stream or the bed of the ocean or;:any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air.. Will the proposal result in (a) Ai.r:eniissions .or deterioration of ,ambient quality? .(b) -.:The -creat.ion _of;`objectionable odors ?. (c) Alteration of'air movement, moisture or temperature,, or any.change in .climate; locally or regionally? Explanation: either x 3. Water. Will the proposal result (a) Changes in currents, or the .course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the. rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c). Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any .alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters,-either through direct additions or withdrawal §, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- x • (h)'_ Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the ..seepage : of leachate, phosphates, . detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground ',waters? :,' Reduction in 'the `'amount of water otherwise avail= able for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: Flora... Will the proposal. result in: ;(a) Change in the diversityof species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, . grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants.)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or •endangered.species of flora? x x (c) .Introduction of new species A:& flora into.an.area, •or:i.n a -- barrier. to the normal replenishment. of existing species ?. -. (d). Reduction in acreage of.-any'agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result a n: (a) Changes in the diversity of'species, or numbers of :any. species of fauna (.birds., land animals including reptiles, fish and .shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna:)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna?-:-.: (c') Introduction of new species . of fauna into an -area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? • Explanation: x x x • • YES MAYBE NO Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: The project would generate a temporary increase in noise during construction. Following construction, there would be an insignificant increase in noise due to additional vehicular traffic. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanat.ion:interior and exterior sources of lighting would • be added to the site. The lighting has been designed to avoid spilling onto adjacent streets or properties. Land Use. .Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? 'Explanation: Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: .(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Depletion.of any.nonrenewab.le natural.. resource? Explanation: :Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides,-chemicals • or radi- ation) in,the.event of an accident or upset conditions? . 11. Population. • • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate o :f the .human population of an. area? •- Explanation: Business work hours activity; will be given an insignificant increase due to this . warehouse building in an area that currently supports a large similar distribution use.' YES MAYBE NO Will._the proposal affect existing housing, . or :create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: Transportation / Circulation. ill the proposal result i'n: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities., or demand : for. riew parki ng? .:(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations .to_present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or.goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,. bicyclists or. pedestrians? Explanation: There would be An insignificant increase in traffic.on Andover Park-East: :.Public,Services. •Will the.proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? Fire protection? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x x x • (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Ex l a nat i on -) The •building will be protected by: an- automatic Fir Protection Sprinkler System .' • b) , Pant, experience has ' indicated some .tenants install. and maintain:.their own security: services to a. high standard and.- demand 'for:Public Police Services will not:be.signifieant. 15. Energy. Will the :proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) - Demand upon existing sources -of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? x . •.Explanation: x 16: Utilities. Will the: °proposarresult in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following ':utilities: (a). Power or 'natural (b). Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) .Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will. the proposal result in the.crea- tion:of any health hazard or potential heal_th.hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: x 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to • the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? • Explanation 19. Recreation. YES MAYBE NO Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? 20 Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, ,object or building? Explanati.on:. CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and.complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation orwillfullack of full disclosure on my part. Agent for Proponent Signature and Title McCann Construction Company Inc. 950 Andover Park East • Seattle, Washington 98188 -8- Date x x