The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-112 - TRILAND CORPORATION / PROJECT 128 - BENDIX BUILDINGBENDIX BLDG PRIJECT 128 EPIC -FD -112 CITY OF /TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /FINAL DECLARAT I Oid OF AM—SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency Bendix Bldg. Addition to Project #128 Triland Corporation 505 Baker Boulevard, Tukwila City of Tukwila File No EPIC -FD -112 This proposal has been determined to (Iiii/not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (II/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date 28 June 1979 Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development COMMENTS: Signature • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM•. CITY OF TUIC''IIA • • This .questionnaire must be completed by all persons,applying for a permit. from the City of Tukwi l a,'. unl ess "i it is determined by. the. Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible: Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. . BACKGROUND 1. Name, of Proponent; ., • Triland: Corporation- Address and Phone Number..ofi:..Pro,ponent:.. 141'1: 4th _Avsnue `..Suite 1120: ° ••• Seat ale; :yashi;ngton •'98101•= 682 -776a • 3: Date iCheckl i st- Submitted: June 26; 1979 --4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Building and .Planning 5. Name of Proposal,:if applicable: Bendix Building Addition to Project.-: 128.: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the•Proposal (including but not limited 0 its size, general design elements; and other factors that will 'give an-:ac- curate understanding of its scope and nature): - . -_•• :.. 'Project' 478 is -a building- addition: of 4,264 :SF to an existing facility known as the• Bendix Buildin:. This addition-td .resents ' a 407 ex: _.t" . • '.' • . • final .floor area. . The 'property boundaries .and- access to existing streets and :utilities remain unchanged by this addition.. Provision for.this.building expansion was incorporated into the original planning and design. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, :as well as the extent of the land'area affected by any environmental impacts=; :•in -. cluding • any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): . • The present Bendix building address is 505 Baker Boulevard and is a :.fu:ily.:developed site with the exception' of the expansion area. 'The office'.addition 'ar-i11:.be used by • the existing tenant. • . • Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: December 1979 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for. the Proposal (federal, state and local):. (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES X- NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit • (h) Storm. Water system permit; .• • •.(i). Curb cut. permit • • ...(j) Electrical :perMit. (State of Wa.shijigt0n) (k) Plumbing permit (King County). • (1) Other:— • • • YES NO x YES x NO YES x NO YES x NO x NO YES x NO x NO •: 0 ••••••....•, YES x NO • • .• .* • . • • . • - , • , 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with, proposal? If yes, explain:••••• - No .;?.. • •• • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by . your proposal? If yes, explain: 0 0 . • No . • . . • , . • • 12. Attach • any: other application form .fhat_haS. been compl eted regarding the prO- . posal; if none has been completed, bUt-is:expected to be filed r at some future . date,-deScr'fbe:00 natdre-of,such application forth: . - • • • . . City Of' Tnkwila.' Planning • COMniis ion ' • • . . • City of Tukwila..Build trig- 'permit. • _ • Cit of T 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS-. • (Explanations of all !"yes and '!maybe" _answers are required • • • • • • • • • • • • 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? - *, • - • • . Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? ..• • - (c) • • • .YES: MAYBE NO , • . . - - • - • Change in.-topography or ground .surface relief fea- tures? - • - - (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? x • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ) 'Changes in-deposition or erosion of beach sands, or. -'changes in siltation, deposition or, erosion which %may modify.the channel of a river or stream or the : bed of the ocean or.an'y bay,-inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO • .Explanation: Will the, proposal result in: Air. emissions , or deterioration of-ambient ai quality ?. (b) ;.The creation of:-objectionable odors ?, (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any . change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: Water: Will the proposal result in :... (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any .alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters,-either through direct additions or withdrawal §, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h 'Deterioration in ground-water quality.; either through direct injection, or through.the seepage' of. leachate;' .phosphates, . detergents, waterborne ,s . virus, or bacteria. or. substances-into substances-nto the ground..waters ?.'; . YES MAYBE NO - Reduction' in the7.amount of..water`_otherwise avail.- able for public water .. supplies? Explanation: Flora.. :. Will the proposal, result in: ) 'Change in the diversity or numbers of: any; species of flora (including trees; shrubs, . grass, .. crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare endangered_ species of flora? (c).. Introduction of new' species •of flora into.an.area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species ?. (d). Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: Fauna. 'Will the proposal result .in: (a) Changes in the diversity of!species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and.shell.fish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) :Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,or result' in a barrier to the migration .or movement of fauna? . (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? • Explanation: • YES MAYBE NO Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x Explanation:' The project would generate a temporary increase in noise. during construction. Following construction, there would be an insignificant increase in •noise due to additional . vehicular traffic. . • Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: Interior and exterior sources.of lighting would be added to the site: The lighting has been designed'to avoid-spilling onto adjacent streets or properties. • 8, Land'Use. .Will the proposal result.in - the altera -- tion-of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: • Natural Resources. Will the proposal result-.in:' .(a) .Increase in the rate of use of-any natural resources? • (b)._.Depletion.of any.. nonrenewable, natural: resource? Explanation Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk:of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not, limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: • x .x. 11. • Population. Will.the proposal alter the location,. distribution, density, or-growth rate • o•f..the human population of an area ?. YES MAYBE NO Explanation::.:Business-:work hours activity, will"be' given_ insiificant. i gnincrease due; to: this; of f ce: build ng`: -in an`. area that .;currently` suppdirts: -a ,large' similar offi•ce/ tail'warehouse use. `?•.:'' -.;:' ousing'. Will, the proposal affect existing housing, . - or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result i (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? .(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? • (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or. pedestrians? Explanation: ..There' would be an insJ nificant increase .in traffic on:Andover Park East and Todd Boulevard: Public.Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in 'a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: . . • (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? -- -- (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . x x (f) Other go- vernmental services? Explanation:-- . Past ..experience : has- indicated some tenants install aiid % 'maintain: their: own .security services to a high" .standard: and'demand -'for Public.' Police Services .will: not . be ' significant: ..... `- YES MAYBE NO 15. Energy .•-, Wi l l - the 'proposal result i n: (a) Use .of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon exi.st:ing sources.of energy, or require the development of new sources of • energy? - Explanation:. 16. Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natura'1 gas? (b)' Communications :sys.tems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: . 17 Human Health. Will. the proposal result in the crea- tionsof any health hazard or potential health.hazard (excluding mental-.-health)? Explanation: -7- x x x • • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- . tion of any scenic vista or vieiv open to • • the public, or will the proposal result. . in the creation of an aesthetically of--. fen.sivesite:open to public view? • • • YES MAYBE NO • 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact. upon the quality or :quantity. of exist- -mg recreational opportunities? .• • • • . • . . , . • . • . . . • • . • • ' . • • , • • . • • - • • . , . . • . • . 20. Archeological/Histroical.. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, ,object or building? •Explanation: . . • . . • . . CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: . . . I, the undersigned, state,that to the best of my knowledge the above • - - information is true and complete.. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of hOn-significance that it might issue in • reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation • ., or-willful lack of full' dis'closure on my part. Agent for Proponent Signature-and Title - McCann Cofistruction Company Inc.' 950 Andover Park East • Stlattle, WA 98188 •:,