Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-113 - HAYDEN ISLAND - PARKWAY SQUAREPARKWAY SQUARE EPIC -FD -113 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /FINAL DECLARATION OF /NON —S I Gid I F I CA dCE Description of proposal Parkway Square Proponent Hayden Island, Inc. Location of Proposal Strander Blvd. & Southcenter Pkwy. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No EPIC -FD -113 This proposal has been determined to (fie /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (44 /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development Date August 15, 1979 Signature COMMENTS: 1. Mitigating measures regarding traffic and related considera- tions as may be required by the Public Works Department. 2. Conditions as may be required as a result of a King County Hydraulics Division review. CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: -7/90o itig y 54? v //Pr::_-- PROJECT ADDRESS: S0jfk , IU ew b feTA2e Z -ice,), 0/7Y DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) 21/Building: `6� %� # / % 7 Y by: � c] Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: 142e-et ,ate --afri Date: To: PLANNING DIVISION - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRANSMITTAL '7 Au G. os Iq1 ci Building Division 0 Fire Department 0 Public Works Department 0 Other ATT: AL I) 1 ep enz Project: PA(ZkWAy Squ +42 Applicant: A 1 601%.! IS LA-tub ) IIv L The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above referenced project: Environmental Checklist 0 Preliminary Plat 0 Environmental Impact Statement 0 Final Plat 0 Site /Development Plans 0 Rezone Request Q Shoreline Permit Application ED Variance Request 0 Conditional Use Permit Application 0 Other: The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com- plete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or, if needed, attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: / 13 / 1911 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Review Department comments: Ar' ✓1 By: C./l, Date: ?-/0 PLANNING De SION - OFFICE OF COMMUN • DEVELOPMENT TRANSMITTAL Date: 5///7? To: Building Division 0 Fire Department 0 Public Works Department E Other ATT: Project : EPA 100 ft- )7 SQ feE Applicant: Ha r.d , TA,- The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans . or materials for the above referenced project: (g Environmental Checklist 0 Preliminary Plat ❑ Environmental Impact Statement 0 Final Plat Site /Development Plans 0 Rezone Request 0 Shoreline Permit Application 0 Variance Request 0 Conditional Use Permit Application 0 Other: The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com- plete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or, if needed, attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: Review Department comments: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** By: Date: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: S DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: CITY OF TUKWILA Alk ENVIR!MENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV, FORM N S/9 note 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ B 'ldingr: f'Engineering: 6/I(0/79 ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑. Police: by: by: by: fTt 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: L e e l.vi dI /h cr ease ,1/o w Ouch pav mn%7' SuRe#9 Mkt FLOyE NL44 r; Fitterv% 4rti vAEID .rte — 3 c. — pi9,uP.+4 /Ri— on .Sr7� w r 1...4, ea r — ' Sirooe4e.re rn.' r-zz Tv P49,0 cie 21276 C.zin (Zy AWED( Fr c.4'77 v aF DA/4.1 wA-(i Porn - w) Fits t•. S rrit -- 3 • PLANNING DPISION - OFFICE OF COMMUN TRANSMITTAL Date: S- /ll To: ❑ Building Division D Fire Department Public Works Department D Other ATT : '%�efl _ M o e� rt � /TG �✓ Project: Applicant: The above the above FA/ Ma y s- a 0/1-ie 71/ de ao / a mentioned applicant referenced project: DEVELOPMENT has submitted the following plans or materials for Environmental Checklist Environmental Impact Statement Site /Development Plans L_1 Shoreline Permit Application D Conditional Use Permit Application Preliminary Plat Final Plat Rezone Request Variance Request Other: The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com- plete the project file. Please use the space provided below for separate sheet. Requested response date: Review Department comments: your comments or, if needed, attach a * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** (,sirer exitST By: Date: Sl /4/77 CITY OF TUKWILA Ah ENV I AMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVlTW FORM PROJECT NAME: PArinA)4V SQ0A'feE PROJECT ADDRESS: Sochi L) w.cr S3,4140 DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 57(q/41 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) 0 Building: by: IBInngineering: by: E Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑.Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: Date: • PLANNING D • SION - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TRANSMITTAL To: j ilding Division Fire Department 0 Public Works Department 0 Other ATT: iva (>ow /e), Project : AKIew #1- Y 5 Q viiR E- Applicant: The above the above /4aycIPo .1 Cfaud, a"'xvc, mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for referenced project: Environmental Checklist Environmental Impact Statement pSite /Development Plans 0 Shoreline Permit Application fl Conditional Use Permit Application 0 Preliminary Plat 0 Final Plat Rezone Request 0 Variance Request Other: The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com- plete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or, if needed, attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 5 / 15 / %9 I Review Department comments: ,3/ JO S �� j � Rey ,1'r c -�-4 e yrio, e pr S eC, 3 eoz(b)g a7'c 111 e- V14, fair 01 ffidp ('o By: Date: /5_ 74 • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Hayden Island Inc. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 909 N Tomahawk Island Drive Portland, OR 97217 503- 283 -4111 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila (B.S.I.P.) King Co. (Flood Control Perm 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Parkway Square 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): The proposal consists of 3 retail /office use bldgs. of an approximate 80,000 sq ft and a landscaped parking area for approximately 450 cars on a 7 acre site. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): The site is bounded by warehousing /retail, a convention hotel (under construction), and vacant land (Tukwila pond) within a commercial /industrial area of Tukwila (Southcenter). The land is a fill of approx. 11 ft. and rises from street grade 4 -5 ft. All storm water to be piped to municipal system. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Sept. 1980 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES x NO (c) Building permit YES x NO (d) Puget SOUS Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x (e) Sewer hook up permit 0 YES x NO (f) Sign permit YES x NO (g) Water hook up permit YES x NO (h) Storm water system permit YES x NO (i) Curb cut permit YES x NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No additions beyond those outlined. The proiect will be-Phased construction until Sent 1980. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Architectural review, King Co. Hydraulics Permit, others as listed in #9 above. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- OP YES MAYBE NO x x • • YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: (b) Unconsolidated fill soils under bldg. sites will need to be excavated and replaced for adequate structure bearing. c) Surface required of top 2' -3' will be necessary for site drainage. x x 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x (b) The creation.of objectionable odors? x (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x — Explanation•c) Solve minimal contribution to change of local climate by increase of heat absorbtion surfaces (paving, . roofs, etc.) Negligible to immeasurable effects when compared to overall Southcenter commercial / . industrial development. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (9) -3- x x x • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? " Explanation• b) Paving, bldg. roof, etc. will increase surface runo -decrease perculation. Storm drainage to be piped to municipal system. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? x (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment:of existing species? x (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x Explanation: Site has pioneering.species of no significance growing over fill. Site is surrounded by established commercial /industrial development. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? x (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Site on proximity of 1-5, 1-405 freeways, major shopping/ industrial area. Contribution to noise level negligible. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce .new light or glare? As above #6. Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: x x x • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x x x Explanation: Retail /office complex will generate some additional vehicular trips in an area designecl for commercial /industrial traffic. An additional traffic lane will be' dedicated and constructed along South Center Parkway to ;accommodate acceleratinr. and decelerating traffic. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? x (b) Police protection? x (c) Schools? x (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x • YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? x Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? . i (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Urban systems exist and are designed for capacity of this site. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal - result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential • health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: x x x • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of .31 disclosure on my part. s 9 q-- --141 n.ture a d Title Date x x Doubl¢tr¢¢ • Inri job: Lfc2`✓ISrLd. • 27; •24'9•—W..:gtr site- plan fifth rendition.: 1 "= 30'