HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-114 - SEAFIRST BANK - DRIVE UPSEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL
BANK DRJVE-UP
EPIGI'D -114
CITY OF/TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
-Pf?ef'et- /F I NAL
DECLARATION OF NON— SIGidIFICANCE
Description of proposal Seeuttic. firs7L Net l BGcr .
Proponent Se4'17r+ n
Location of Proposal To j la P ,-I.w.a y
Lead Agency e ;4-y , -r Tv J ► 1 4.. File No EP /e — Pp' t/5t
This proposal has been determined to (e/not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS (4s /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official l<`, 11 S4 -o s
Position /Ti tl e J re_
Date ,-v�' . 13, /?
COMMENTS:
Signature
• CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: SEht- fie.17 set)-TH -c�wrEt ,®i /7VC/ --Ss vE- oP
PROJECT ADDRESS: �,�,�{� .�, Pa.J U) e-4 -1/0,,e1 -174,444;Z Padel$ /'
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: &/4.5/0
1.. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviec�er)
OBuilding: 0/ / /7 r by: C� �'�
❑ Engineering: by:
9 9:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
PLANNING D •SIGN - OFFICE OF COMMUN . DEVELOPMENT
TRANSMITTAL
Date: 6� 02'
To: 'Building .Division
0 Fire Department
0 Public Works Department
0 Other
ATT:
Project:
Applicant:
s I:4;41 zee &- 0/o_ -
SS-P�a Pa
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for
the above referenced project:
Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat
❑ Environmental Impact Statement ❑ Final Plat
Site /Development Plans ❑ Rezone Request
❑ Shoreline Permit Application ❑ Variance Request
Conditional Use Permit Application Other:
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The planning
Division needs your comments to satisfy necessary review procedures and to com-
plete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or, if needed, attach a
separate sheet.
Requested response date: 2 / Ep / Pp
Review Department comments:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
By:
• CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
Sr sr /5 S a a ?/ C ee Arra �Pi¢NC�y
DR'v,E - Li/3
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: (9/5/719
1.. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
❑ Building: by:
C Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
(date)
(reviewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS: ,! /3'
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 6/ /s`''9'
• CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
S E, - P7../es crryc
1.. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
❑ Building:
❑ Engineering:
❑ Fire:
_ ❑ Planning:
E Police:
(date)
fied-�vchl -v/0
xlfloPA
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
(reviewer)
by:
by:
by:
by:
by: 6-2 /-%
QUESTION 14
The proposed bank facility will require the movement of large amounts of cash
from the present bank building across the East parking fiw3* area and the
access rooad connecting the mall parking facilities and Tukwila Parkway.
This movement of funds will require additional attention and surveillance by
members of the force on patrol. Some thought and planning should be given
to alternate methods of moving'personnei and funds from branch to drive —in.
• •
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 5 jsl9
-_ i
BUILDING 'DEPT.
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental 0uestionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Seattle -First National Bank
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent:
Exchange Building, Floor 15
821 2nd Ave., Seattle, WA 98104 583 -5565 (Glen Thistle)
3. Date Checklist Submitted: June 14, 1979
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Dept.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
Southcenter Branch Drive -Up
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
6 lane drive -up bank facility (consisting of a 400 SF teller's
building & a 4,000 SF Canopy), automobile queuing lanes and landscaping
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
The site is located adjacent to the exiting branch bank at the N_F_ rnrner
of Southcenter Shopping Center. The site is graded, unimproved, and generally
- flat, surrounded by a service station (S), parking lots (S &W), freeway (N) &
vacant land (E).
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: November 1979
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES X NO
(c) Building permit YES X NO
•
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit
(e) Sewer hook up permit
rfign permit
(g)
(h)
Water hook up permit
Storm .water system permit
(i) Curb cut permit
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington)
(k) Plumbing permit (King County)
(1) Other:
FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT
YES NO X
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
YES X NO
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Flood control zone application
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
X
X
X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
Disruptions of the soil & changes in topography will be
limited to excavations for footings and addition of
slight landscape berms.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? _
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? _
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of*the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
(g)
-3-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
• •
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
WATER DETENTION SYSTEM PER KING COUNTY REQUIREMENTS
YES MAYBE NO
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
LANDSCAPING WILL ADD MAPLE TREES, EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND 'LAWN
TO THE SITE
X
X
X
X
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration X
or movement of fauna? —
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
Explanation:
•
• •
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
ADDITIONAL SITE LIGHTING AND AUTO LIGHTS
WITHIN SITE.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
' tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
•
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods? X
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X.
Explanation:
Additional vehicular traffic to the site may be generated.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection? X
(b) Police protection? X
X
(c) Schools? _
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including X
roads?
-6-
.
• •
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? X
Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
X
X
X
•
• YES MAYBE NO
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
lie101/
Signature and tle Date
David Nordfors, Joyc ordfors & Assoc.
Partner
June 14, 1979
X
X
X