Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-12 - HIGHWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS - UNDERGROUND TANKSHIGHWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS UNDERGROUND TANKS. 103 NELSON PLACE EPIGFD -12 PARKS ; RECREATION TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM CITY of TUKWILA, OFFICE of COMMUNITY. DEVELOPMENT 31 March 1977 Steve Hall Fred Satterstrom Highway Safety Products Environmental Questionnaire After reviewing your concerns on the Environmental Questionnaire for Highway Safety Products, I called the plant manager, Mr. Chet Clipse. According to Mr. Clipse the facilities proposed will not increase water consumption due to the fact that it is a "mixing" process only and will involve only the chemicals and substances in the underground tanks. Also, . according to Mr. Clipse, no discharge from the process will enter sanitary sewers. He states that there will be "no discharge" from the operation, except for a "bad batch" which will be placed in an empty underground storage tank. This "bad batch" will be pumped out at a later time and disposed of. For your information, the Planning Division is recommending a negative declaration on the proposal. FS /cw cc: Kjell Stoknes CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r 'rroro3u - /FINAL DECLARATION OF C I Gm} I f .I CAHCC/NO� -S I Gr I F I CA dCE Description of proposal Underground Tank Storage' Proponent Highway Safety Products, Inc. Location of Proposal 103 Nelson Place Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- FD -12. This proposal has been determined to (.0rm- /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (4,/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date 30 March 1977 Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development COMMENTS: Signature CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. I. BACKGROUND L. Name of Proponent: HIGHWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 103 Nelson, Tukwila, Wash. 98188 Phone: 228 -6970 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Manufacturing Expansion 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an ac- curate understanding of its scope and nature): Underground storage and paint mixing facilities. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, in- cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): 103 Nelson Place, Tukwila, WA. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of. the Proposal: April, 1977 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x • (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NOx (c) Building permit YES x NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO/:___ (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NOX (f) Sign permit YES N0_x___ (g) Water hook up permit YES NO X (h) Storm water system permit YES NOX (i) Curb cut permit YES NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington). YES X. NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Building Permit II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in- either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X. (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO x x x x (g) -3- (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: x 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanatipn: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the.altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a). Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO x X x X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? x" Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power . or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in'the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Plant Manager March 29, 1977 Signature and Title Date x x e 1 I4 if CITY OF TUKWILA el ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIOdNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: gW♦ Cvfig' r( p`) el-5 PROJECT ADDRESS: 10 3 Oe sash FL, m. mow. DATE 66[PTED rI Tom: Rect.' O t\'1 Ara_,"� 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: Engineering : alb On191Z. 11 by: 4.111-11cat CJ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: �v �—► t. W D''ittS Vv% E 11 PAoNr tvtmt P CC" rAC1LI'T1E77 1N“1-t`ftSe ! P191 E 12 CAI tNc11 O ? (1)‘‘A., ID 1 S C tiAaleS }=120 p"2oo GEM a Pt Act 1 C;Kno99.1,1 e*a.4 Ti"t Mf11/4t (2TCt& CLe ,& ce F1200" M ET20 1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3 Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by Date Date by Staff Person Letter, Phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986.