Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-13 - RADOVICH - FILL AND WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENTJOHN RADOVICH FILL PF,RMIT WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT MAULEAVE&S 143 PL EPIC -FD -13 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Pt,'S /FINAL I)ECLARATIOil OF ii+* /I'JON- SIG►iIFICAN CE Description of proposal Fill Application and Warehouse Development Proponent John C. Radovich Location of Proposal Maule Avenue in vicinity of 143rd Place Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. This proposal has been determined to ( /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (49/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date April 27, 1977 Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development Signature tA" COMMENTS: This is a withdrawal of a former affirmative threshold determination dated 25 January 1977 based upon the following stipulations being complied with: 1. Dedicate 14 feet adjacent to 143r'd place. 2. Submit a developer's agreement to equitably participate in an L.I.D. to improve the street. These items have been executed. CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED /FINAL DECLARATIOi1 OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency Fill application and warehouse development John C. Radovich Maule Avenue in vicinity of 143rd Place City of Tukwila. File No. N/A This proposal has been determined to (have /nave) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /is —aot) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) ,(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office ofi Community Development Date 25 January 1977 COMMENTS: Signature Present South 143rd Place provides access to properties and has only a 12 foot right- of -way. Unless property is dedicated by this parcel for additional right -of -way there will be a traffic bottleneck created here as adjacent lands develop. The developer should improve his half of the road at such time as a building permit is applied for. Maule Avenue is proposed to accomodate a trail in Tukwila's Park Plan. To accomodate this in the future, no access to this property will be allowed from Maule Avenue. Access points should be shifted to South 143rd Place. It, in all likelihood, will be a one way street in the future. Declaration of Significance / Page 2 Non - Significance 25 January 1977 COMMENTS CONTINUED: Drainage and water supply are not available. To mitigate the negative impacts, the following could be done: 1. Dedicate the needed amount of your property for public right -of -way. The City would require the same from all other properties on the street in conjunction with any permits. This. would provide. ' feet of right-of-way. 2. Agree in writing to improve your half of the street in conjunction with a building permit to a condition acceptable to the City. 4. ' = - .. . — �- - "=" 361sstorm. — Reference WAC 197 -10 -355 (3), attached. 0,4 Katt/34 -RAO ivka ety- 31 i7 � r - 61-. cf a4i coci re-e-f,ell LP, A) 1 0 f 4.d N Q ylia , r re e�ctle e�% , Certyidd 077 ts2- ,c,4 fete-4, •exists a reasona belief by the lead agency that the pro -. posal could have, significant adverse impac .he procedure contained in subsection (1) above shall also followed. WAC 197 -10 -355 FORM OF DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON- ' SIGNIFICANCE. (1) A declaration substantially, in the form set forth in subsection (2) of this section shall be used for all declarations of significance and proposed and final.dec- larations of non- significance. This form shall be attached to the environmental checklist together with any other informa- tion obtained pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -330, and maintained in the files of the lead agency. The form without the attachments shall also be retained in the SEPA public information center of the lead agency for one year after issuance. (2) The form is as follows: FORM FOR [PROPOSED /FINAL] DECLARATION OF [SIGNIFICANCE /NON- SIGNIFICANCE] Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency This proposal has been determined to [have /not have] a signifi- cant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS [is /is not] required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision .was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Signature (3) If the form is for a declaration of environmental significance, the lead agency may add to the information con- tained in subsection (2) of this section a listing of those environmental impacts which led to the declaration, together with a brief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts of the proposal to such an extent that the lead agency would with- draw its declaration and issue a [proposed/final] declaration of non - significance. WAC 197 -10 -360 THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONCRITERIA-- APPLI- CATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. (1) The lead agency shall apply the questions in the environmental checklist to the total proposal, including its indirect effects [See WAC 197 -10 -060], to determine whether the proposal will result in a significant adverse impact upon the quality of the environment. The threshold decision shall be based solely upon this process. The questions contained in the environmental checklist are ex- clusive, and factors not listed therein shall not be considered in the threshold determination. (2) The questions in the environmental checklist are not weighted. It is probable there will be affirmative answers to several of these questions while the proposal would still not -28- MEMORANDUM CITY of TUKWDLA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 29 December 1976 TO: Steve Hall, Director, Public Works FROM: Gary Crutchfield sistant Planner, OCD SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE: Radovich Property Attached is the Environmental Questionnaire submitted by Mr. John Radovich in conjunction with an application for Fill Permit. The proposed action would allow filling of the triangular parcel with ±4000 cubic yards of fill material as much as '4 feet in height. The fill action is requested on the pretense that a warehouse will be constructed presumably in accordance with the site plan attached to the Questionnaire. Please offer any comments you feel relevant and pertinent to the matter, particularly Maule Avenue and utilities. I will hold any action in abeyance until you respond. GC /cw TO: f FROM: (S/ SUBJECT: • OFFICE MEMO CITY or TU KW I LA • ,/e r-e- re o efid e A S Ato TO: FROM: ��- S U B J E CT : jf,( a4/--e" • ( `1 • ` h / r OFFICE MEMO CITY or TUKWILA TO: 64 FROM: SUBJECT: • OFFICE MEMO CITY of TUKWILA �IIW dZsiv. , 2adov l GLl Ft (1 Fir144. C.C>wmt444 / e1 . DF.G • w W S tc---cje-4 W`, litiVeltA4 Ate. PCC& lA i 3e) `Rec. 7 14,1/4r„,t CITY OF TUK4lILA CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above infor- mation is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title �! Date Project Name: CC.) r .4 s c- (5) C7f ' C- Project Address: J/4/3 ,,.// /J6u7,vtyu t/ T /(w,/ BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS: Check one 1. Date of Review:D Building by: ( +) or ( -) pPlanning 117/77 by: t Engineering 12- bo --7(, by: Cj ( +) or (; Police by: ( +) or ( -) Fire by: .( +) or ( -) '2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. h . Sign .ture and Title of Responsible Official Date 3. Applicant was notified of decision on: • r /U4C- ?7 —t o -4' �3J by Date Staff Person by Letter, phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 759. ( +) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be done. ( -) Means .recommend a full environmental impact statement not be done. CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: -,/o•,`A/ ii9,/Pov'<h/ 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 737- 77TH S F ,mer . 76)as ,Se ;yd - 3 . Date Checklist Submitted: / ?— 02 8 -710 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: ?r o„l /u�� -� ,�'��e��f / -/*",w 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: ,Cr 4;-- <442„5�e ,t2,,41 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an ac- curate understanding of its scope and nature) : pia Per+ /$ti (i1� ReVIM.I / 174.i C'P O �� �o./s plc / `� �! o a 4i� g c) / GJorr Foul wi�� �J� 1,/:(17:f i- / C°¢i-s ¢r %f-tee, - Qd/21 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, in- cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal) : (4}, 3$444411. 3"1 Piy'e -c- 74. V 4 172 r/1GIr GsrlY Odfo /�! S / /m •! /// �G/JcI G .'1,-F/y / l/arC/ ,57- 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Le..9e-c'. 4.727 9 List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b) King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO YES NO YES NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: t= k, PwHn■-4' -� -� Su.v c ka frte., YES NO YES ' NO YES ✓ NO YES NO YES 'NO YES ✓ NO YES — NO YES '" NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: /V 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? f yes, explain: S/v� — k . S-vt -ne= C/ . ' R-0-44) cy.ri /43rd. p /4e-e_J C. 2-tia. o bo tflevm, lee r ?— ✓ E' d �j 1 ;f-- � c �� , s TY , 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal;'if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: ion II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all ''yes" and "maybe" answers are required), 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or ov rcover- ing of the soil? / �; // w, /% e( f (a, j0 l`�rcN o �ir'1�eer /OfJ / pc/O c /r�P /aN (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- t e s ? // ..�, %/ .,6.•/#7 p /°/ opGC-7Y o,60 u•• ■o o< °off (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, Dr the rate and amount of surface r �no j ? / /Of7o7�/l T /ice ct ��Q cc. // .0e- �e P (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or ex avations? S�Df'i+v /i/seryt w /�� 6C /..?-7 rrG!s-r� -3- YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public•water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? ) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: «c OY ./�lc/- clrsiyf! spois-c- 4P'4J20 S. / 7/juC �S crlri�i1�. �t �/ /r��° 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? ' Explanation: _S r� mac. / (P c"- / 07C 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: /d,,. /u s 0002-d/ 7L/Z S- 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: / A✓/ i v1 � /4 / , 4- S/ / `I /ev / / -S c o c'OGr/ % 17/77 e'Sc7/ /e* 14. Public services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? /i- v (f) YES MAYBE NO Other governmental services? Explanation: ��� -`T`�eA 9 77-7e._ -. rr A72- q/--ea w /// /yc-f`cc fe_ fGc_ <-0c.Pr�1 try (ye) a e /-7-7,4%fc".41--- / Scrr-!/«-eJ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the 41.5k' following utilities: cge(a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? 1.161, (c) Water? Q444-1 �' (d) Sewer or septic tanks? .l (e) Storm water drainage? e (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: y/7 se- L 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or histor- ical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • W.C. Y!, t3i;it c); REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR PART FOR PERSONAL USE OR RESALE IS PROHIBITED BY LAW . O . A t. 4,,....il • 'KROLL MAP.COMiPAN'(. ANC.; SEATTLE! L.EG EEC D-. ∎ .s . cw u . - oiJI4! MUi: !3Lil'j LGJ R E P R O D U C T I O N N WHOLE OR PART FOR PERSONAL USE OR RESALE IS PROHIBITED BY LAW w 'L .KROLI... MAP COMPANY. ;NC. SEATTLE i.lP� i�.�• ar�Hi_�. . �.00°FT TG 7.C_. - : / '• • • • • • t3/`7 : C "G. I•✓.Q .A„ G✓ ..- r.c.aR:.:7 ✓O S /CAN _ f�C.k__C S S Z.9'9 T, 1•‘:‘ . n`h aN' /'94 r•Y p■ LOT G /� ✓� .3G�•3S F.ICa. • /y.''e.o ...S,,O /KE S. ic>.E S. /off 4n /G. •oti tOr . = z�.'3/ _TOPOG/,1 Pry-/ Y FG • z// C_Ave 737 - 77r "�:� CArc ti GsJs61v 4 ;1h s m'7/` f) Je ©iT /• f ref. L0 3e:.' S.P. M.{�•. .S. / "r S 77. ..S • - / D ) • Lt Of tRO.J I. SC 121 tv I fit► C1.41 Engineer & Land Sury *yor Land Su43divislon F, U:i}fias Percolation texts & StruCrurc4 De:iQ 15622 MQDlowild S. W. meant* Washington 9 l66 CH 2-6621 • cV, 3 Pa DO,o PLANNING PARKS d RECREATION BUILDING 6 January 1977 • CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. John C. Radovich 2737 - 77th S.E. Mercer Island, Washington 98040 Dear Mr. Radovich: This office, as well as others, has reviewed the Environmental Question- naire regarding your proposed fill permit on the parcel of property located adjacent Maule Avenue between South 143rd Place and South 144th Street in Tukwila. In order to make a determination as to the significance of the proposed fill action, it is essential that additional information be provided. 1. A detailed drawing of the existing conditions and of the proposed fill. 2. A definitive description, if not a drawing, of the proposed use. Such additional information must address the concerns expressed by the Public Works Department in the attached memorandum. A decision on the Environmental Questionnaire may not be made until the necessary information has been considered, so it is to your benefit to provide such at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Gary Crutchfield. Assistant Planner GC /cw cc: Dick Williams, Pub Wks Dept Al Pieper, Bldg Off Attachment 6230 Southcenter Boulevard m Tukwila, Washington 98188 m (206) 242 -2177 • 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 8230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98087 telephone C 908 3 949 - 9177 December 30, 1976 u © To: Gary Crutchfield, Assistant Planner ZI 0 From: Dick Williams, Office Engineer la -I Subject: Environmental Questionnaire - Radovich Property 5 J m 1. The proposed fill on the site will cause the storm run -off to collect New (A on Maule Avenue. Storm run -off will have to be contained on site and Y have to be,piped.to the existing 36" storm drain manhole located at CC the intersection of Maule Avenue and So. 144th Street. i - 39y .4- Q B: 2. The existing 2" main in Maul Avenue feeds the dead -ended 6" main on CL So. 143rd Place and is not adequate to serve this property. Service iC will have to be provided by a new 8" main from So. 144th Street and !lir W Maule Avenue. il 3. The right -of -way width on So. 143rd Place is 12 feet and is not wide 3 W enough for truck and trailer traffic. Right -of -way on Maule Avenue CI is 20 feet and Steve has discussed the possibility of Maule Avenue • being designated as "one way ". In addition to the right -of -way problems, both streets have a minimum amount (2 ") of asphalt and as such could not W sustain heavy truck traffic for very long without breaking up. Q We do not recommend a full impact statement but rather that the owner should 3 consider the problems involved with construction on the site. th ill RKW /dp W Attachments Cr H II :I'm Z iE W W t Z 0 III Z W AB41WDOW' reL /iD. 2' TAP EX IS I "SERVICE Co A/EEC.T../ ,V ...x8' xG TEE M,J.icM.J.X(=1. COA T,'ACTOk �7o PROVi ; ADAPfl/ AS .:;.,QEQU /RE ESC' /3' 7': LI C Small Small 36:50 6v,' • MEMO RANDUM CITY of TUKW6LA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 29 December 1976 TO: Steve Hall, Director, Public Works FROM: Gary Crutchfield �_.sistant Planner, OCD SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE: Radovich Property Attached is the Environmental Questionnaire submitted by Mr. John Radovich in conjunction with an application for Fill Permit. The proposed action would allow filling of the triangular parcel with ±4000 cubic yards of fill material as much as 4 feet in height. The fill action is requested on the pretense that a warehouse will be constructed presumably in accordance with the site plan attached to the Questionnaire. Please offer any comments you feel relevant and pertinent to the matter, particularly Maule Avenue and utilities. I will hold any action in abeyance until you respond. GC /cw