Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-21 - MINICE RICHARD - ALLIED BODY WORKSALLIED BODY WORKS EPIGFD -21 PLANNING RECREATI ON 13 June 1977 (OTY of TUKWLI L. A OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Allied Body Works 392.2 - 7th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 ATTN: Richard L. Minice RE: Reverse of affirmative threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act. Dear Mr. Minice: This is to notify you that, based on your proposed modifications to the proposal, my affirmative threshold determination will be reversed when all license applica- tions for the proposal are revised to reflect the following modifications in a satisfactory manner. 1. Alignment of private access road, built to City of Tukwila Public Works Depart- ment standards, conform to that shown on Site Plan "A" submitted to the City of Tukwila on 7 June 1977. Configuration of intersection of private access road with Interurban Avenue conform to said Site Plan "A'I submitted on 7 June 1977. 3. A J' -wide walkway open to the public be constructed along the north line of the private access roadway for the full length of said roadway. 4. Existing natural vegetation, particularly those trees of 3" caliper or greater, lying between the access road easement and the Green River remain undisturbed. 5. A 10' -wide landscape strip or decorative fence, to be approved by the Responsible Official at time of building permit application, be placed along the subject pro- perty's south and eastern boundaries. Failure to comply with the above stated modifications, or any significant revision to the site plan submitted 7 June 1977 would cause me not to negate this withdrawal of the declaration of non - significance. The proposal shall then be considered as having significant environmental impacts and an EIS shall be required. Reference WAC- 197 -10 -370. Vey truly yc rk, 4tit&ector ale! Responsible Official KS/ cw cc: Fred Satterstrom 6230 So.rthr.•enter Boulevard e Tul::,i13, [9:r..:hin•7ton 06)86 0 (206) 242 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Vii} /FINAL DECLARATION OF S I Gad I[ I CA(ICL /NON—S I GN I F I CA dCE WITHDRAWAL OF AFFIRMATIVE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION* Description of proposal Allied Body Works, Inc. Proponent Richard L. Minice (Allied Body Works) Location of Proposal 42nd Avenue South along Duwamish River Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -21 This proposal has been determined to (have /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (. /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Kjell Stoknes Office of Community Development Directop Signature COMMENTS: *This declaration constitutes a withdrawal of the affirmative threshold declara- tion dated 27 April 1977. This withdrawal is conditioned upon the following pro- ject modifications agreed to by Allied Body Works by letter dated 28 June 1977: 1. Alignment of private access road, built to City of Tukwila Public Works Department standards, conform to that shown on Site Plan "A" submitted to the City of Tukwila on 7 June. 1977. 2. Configuration of intersection of private access road with Interurban Avenue conform to said Site Plan "A" submitted on 7 June 1977. 3. A 5' -wide walkway open to the public be constructed along the north line of the private access roadway for the full length of said roadway. . 4. Existing natural vegetation, particularly those trees of 3" caliper or greater, lying between the access road easement and the Green River remain undisturbed. 5. A 10' -wide landscape strip or decorative fence, to be approved by the Responsi- ble Official at time of building permit application, be placed along the subject property's south and eastern boundaries.• - 6. A culvert or bridge sufficient to handle a 25 year storm frequency to be provided for creek across-Troperty. (To be submitted at time of Building Permit. 29 June 1977 CITY of TUE'! ' ILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Gordon Vickery Superintendent Seattle City Light 1015 - 3rd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: ALLIED BODY WORKS, INC. SHORELINE PERMIT Dear Mr. Vickery: Thank you for your letter of 15 June 1977 expressing City Light's concerns regarding the above referenced project. For your information, on the basis of the information submitted with Allied Body Works' application for shoreline permit, an environmental impact state- ment was required by the responsible official on 27 April 1977. In the weeks that followed, Allied modified its proposal and pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -370, the responsible official withdrew his affirmative declaration on 28 June 1977 when the applicant revised the application for shoreline permit to indicate project modifications. Approval of the road alignment which passes over the City Light right -of -way onto the Allied site approved only the design and configuration of said road- way and should not be construed as an approval to trespass over City Light's property. We are aware of the fact that an access easement must be obtained from City Light by Allied Body in order for the latter to indeed gain access to the property. I would assume that Allied Body would be aware of this also. I hope this information clarifies the points raised in your correspondence. Siprel , red N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor FNS /cw cc: C -FD -21 6230 Southcenter Boulevard o Tukwila, Washington 98188 m (206) 242 -2177 • BROWN CARGO VANS • BROWN TRAILER SALES & SERVICE • MORRISON SERVICE BODIES • MAXON LIFT GATES • WALTCO LIFT GATES • LIFTMOORE CRANES • GALION HOISTS BODIES AND LIFT GATES • FLAT BEDS • CUSTOM BODIES • ALLIED ARMORED CARS • PAINTING • UPHOLSTERING • VENCO HYDRAULICS • .ALLIED BODY WORKS incorporated 3922-7th Avenue South • Seattle, Washington 98108 June 28, 1977 City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Kjell Stoknes Re: Response to June 13th letter. Dear Mr. Stoknes: Allied Body Works, Inc. accepts all the modifications proposed by your department as outlined in your letter of June 13th. We will certainly do everything possible to see that all your requirements are fulfilled to the utmost. RLM/kh Sincerely, ALLIED BODY WORKS, INC. Richard L. Minice Sec /Treas. MUtual 2-6520 • • Your Seattle City Light Gordon Vickery, Superintendent June 15, 1977 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor Office of Community Development City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Satterstrom: RECEIVE JUN 21 1977 C1IY OF 1U1C1NIlA Thank you for your request to comment on the proposed Allied Body Works project in Tukwila. The sketch of the development shows a proposed 24 -foot roadway that crosses the City of Seattle P.S.E. transmission line right of way. Any road crossing the right of way will require an easement. A formal request for an easement by the developer with the details and location of this proposed road identified will be necessary for departmental approval. Given the type of development proposed and its proximity to current open space property and the shoreline, a full environmental impact statement should be prepared. The City of Tukwila should encourage increased public access to the shoreline which is not presently a component of the project. Even though the property is presently zoned for this type of development, this project would further diminish the agricultural lands of the Green River Valley. It should be viewed in the context of the cumulative effect of this development throughout the valley. Given current development in the Green River Valley, loss of any farmland in the valley constitutes a significant impact. To summarize, City Light recommends that an environmental impact state- ment be prepared on the proposed project and that if the developer intends to cross a City of Seattle right of way that a formal request for an easement be submitted to the Property Management Division of my Department. Sinc Gord.n Vickery Superintendent MO:ct City of Seattle— Department of Lighting, City Light Building, 1015 Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104, (206) 625-3000 MAROfIANDUM • OFFICE; of coM ur..! Y C_ OPME NT 9 June 1977 TO: Kjel FROM: F d SUBJECT: Allied Body Works E.I.S. Over the past few weeks, Allied Body Works has submitted new information and modified their proposal as follows: 1. The former driveway has been re- proposed as a private access road built to city standards. 2. A 5' -wide public walkway is proposed on the north (or "river- side ") of the private access road. 3. Landscaping along the north side of the access road is proposed to remain. 4. Ingress- egress at Interurban has been fully planned and is now satisfactory to, the Public Works Department. 5. Utility extensions have been provided for and are also acceptable to the Public Works Department. Based on the above modifications to the proposal, I would urge that you withdraw the affirmative declaration and issue instead a declaration of non - significance. The stipulations enumerated below should be conditions of that withdrawal and . should be attached to the declaration under the "Comments section: 1. Alignment of private access road, built to City of Tukwila Public Works Department standards, conform to that shown on Site Plan "A" submitted to the City of Tukwila on 7 June 1977. 2. Configuration of intersection of private access road with Interurban Avenue conform to said Site Plan "A" submitted on 7 June 1977.. 3. A 5' -wide walkway open to the public be constructed along the north line of the private access roadway for the full length of said roadway. Kjell Page 2 Director, OCD 9 June 1977 4. Existing natural vegetation, particularly those trees of 3" caliper or greater, lying between the access road ease- ment and the Green River remain undisturbed. 5. A 10' -wide landscape strip or decorative fence, to be approved by the Responsible Official at time of building permit application, be palced along the subject property's south and eastern boundaries. 6. Failure to comply with the above stated modifications, or any significant revision to the site plan submitted 7 June 1977 shall negate this withdrawal of the decla- ration of non - significance. The proposal shall then be considered as having significant environmental impacts and an EIS shall be required. FS /cw Kidder Mathews & Segner inc. Commercial and Industrial Realtors (206) 285 -3700 514 Second Ave. West, Seattle, WA. 98119 Mr. Fred Satterstrom Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Fred: June 7, 1977 As per your request at our meeting Friday, June 3, 1977, the following is a listing of the vegetation along the river -bank from East to West. Approximate Separation from east tree Vegetation Approximate Type 0 Wild berry thicket Blackberry 1001 Two fruit trees Apple 50' Three trees Aspen Less than 5' Wild grasses where no berry thicket 25' One tree Aspen Less than 5' One fruit tree Apple Three trees Aspen One fruit tree Peach Horse tails where no wild grass 25' One tree Willow 25' One tree Aspen 20' One tree Aspen 25' One tree Willow 75' Three trees Willow Less than 5' One fruit tree Apple Two trees Aspen One fruit tree Apple 20' One tree Willow 10' Two fruit trees Apple Less than 5' Raspberry thicket 50' One fruit tree Apple 20' One tree ? 10' Three trees Aspen 20' One dead fruit tree Less than 5' Raspberry thicket 20' Three trees Aspen 10' Two fruit trees Peach 20' One fruit tree Apple Back house 50' One tree Willow area Two trees Aspen Less than 5' One tree ? (continued - page 2) INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE • SALES • LEASING • APPRAISING • CONSULTING Kidder Mathews & Segner inc. Approximate Separation from east tree Less than 5' Creek 75' Less than 5' p 25' 10' 10' 10' 10' As many of Those which are adjacent to the drainage system CM:sp -2- Vegetation One tall ornamental One bush Four fruit trees Raspberry thicket Two trees One tree One fruit tree One fruit tree One fruit tree One fruit tree Three trees One fruit tree One tree One tree June 7, 1977 Approximate Type evergreen Lilac Peach Aspen Willow Apple Peach ApPcle Cherry Willow Cherry Maple Aspen the above trees will remain untouched as can be. in the direct path of the roadway, which are creek to be culverted and the area of the storm outlet, will probably be removed. Sincerely, AAP Chris Muller 9 May 1977 CBTY of TUKW LA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Chris Muller Kidder, James & Mathews, Inc. 514 - 2nd Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 Dear Mr. Muller: • This letter is intended to recap the preliminary EIS conference we had on the Allied Body Works proposal in Tukwila. _ Although all the required and relevent elements of the SEPA guidelines must ordinarily be addressed in any environmental impact statement, the following items must be given special attention with respect to the EIS on Allied Body Works, Inc.: 1. Transportation /Circulation. What are the road alternatives to the site? What are the expected traffic volumes and what is the proposed traffic configuration at Interurban Avenue? 2. Water. Describe the existing condition of the stream which crosses the property and indicate how it will be treated following develop- ment. Is there any way to salvage a part of this stream? 3. Utilities Extensions. How and where are utilities to be extended to service the site? What about lift station at northwest corner of property? In addition to the above, some additional but minor points were identified at the meeting. These included noise impacts, land use impacts, and earth moving activities. This office has copies of the "Data Inventory: Tukwila Planning Area" which is a descriptive inventory of the natural environment, land use, and population elements of the Tukwila area. It may serve as an invaluable reference document in the preparation of your impact statement. If you have any questions or desire additional details on any of the above, please contact rne. S ce3 e1y, r cr'r / OP i/Tir Fred N. Satterstro Planning Supervisor FNS /cw cc: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director (d) 742 -2177 PARKS E RECREAT i 27 April 1977 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Richard L. Minice 3922 - 7th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 RE: ALLIED BODY WORKS, INC. — TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Minice: Enclosed herewith you will find the determination of the Responsible Official that an environmental impact statement is required for the proposed Allied Body Works facility. According to the City's SEPA guidelines adopted by Ordinance #986, you have the option of completing the EIS yourself or having the City of Tukwila complete it for you. In either case, the proponent is responsible for all costs associated with EIS preparation. If time is an important consideration, completing the EIS yourself is invariably the quickest option. I would suggest that you contact me at your earliest convenience in order to arrange a pre -EIS conference. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the elements of the environment which must be stressed or clarified in the impact statement. Re ectfully, polo tterstrom lanning Supervisor FNS /cw cc: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director 6230 .:.. :.hcc te_c Bou1evan, o 7'ul ;:; nyton 9S1SS w (7 (5) . - - CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED /FINAL DECLARATIOiJ OF SIGNIFICANCE/OR4aAilit Description of proposal Allied Body Works, Inc. (Truck Fabrication) Proponent Allied Body Works (Richard.Minice, et al) Location of Proposal 42nd Avenue South along Duwamish River Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No This proposal has been determined to (have/ ) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /l ) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development Date April 27, 1977 Signature COMMENTS: King County S Washington John D. Spellman, County Executive Department of Public Works Jean L. DeSpain, Director 900 King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 April 18, 1977 Mr. Fred Satterstrom Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Wa. 98188 Dear Mr. Satterstrom: ECEIVEI APR 2.61977 C1Ilf OF TUKVVILA Re: Proposed Allied Body Works, Inc. Environmental Questionnaire - Tukwila, Washington We have reviewed the proposed project as described in subject questionnaire and have the following comments and recommendations: 1. Any unstable sections of the adjacent riverbank must be stabilized with rock riprap or all development setback, as shown on the enclosed cross - section. 2. The applicant should provide a culvert or bridge of suf- ficient size to handle the 25 year frequency flood for the existing drainage channel across this property. Also, this drainage analysis should be based on a maximum river water surface elevation of 13.6 feet (Mean Sea Level Datum). 3. The finished grade and first floor elevation of any struc- ture should be at or above elevation 16.3 feet (Mean Sea Level Datum). 4. A State Flood Control Zone permit is required for the pro- posed development. Questions regarding the above comments and recommendations should be referred to Larry Gibbons of my staff on 344 -3874. WBG LRG:lmw Enclosure Sincerely, si WILLIAM B. GILLESPIE Division Engineer Division of Hydraulics • • • • A 11 /e c{ Bo 41 - Q css t l-t r? eJ by„ita. ( ©f cfww sc.) 6m te DA-..) . `lc.,�� "r1 lq`77 b1 Allied 13661 c,c9ett�S e i�e��z S - lw..5 . rescl u- ves Tic A.) s re A C-C.ci t LI atrse's5 czLd LrrtL.irtES. t'l"easa c01... e�le 1s y i t,o as a f re) va (> b �-P ,'S -r ef -- 1�e5 l G ACe.-04 At4t-P c1- U It- l r co i iee A1�� 75 C,a� 1r €lvc a,e, y /i...te 2P pvo b (z_.�t s f-- (iNl& r tuff-RA' ` svl`� 1 �t7 v /�f l) 41 e WGI e.v e Duda e rrr,:7` /s T a! Frances C. North Box, 441 North Bend, Washington 98045 May 24, 1977 Gary Crutchfield, Assistant Planner City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Gary: Your letter regarding the Shoreline Management Substantial Develop- ment Permit by Allied Body Works, Inc. has been referred.to me for answer. I'•m not sure that all my remarks will be directed to the Shoreline Permit aspect, but you can sift out the extraneous material. I don't want it to appear that I'm throwing cold water on the development, but there are some problems. 1. Entry to the property from Interurban Avenue directly west is very near the intersection at 42nd and Interurban Avenue and could pre - sent traffic problems. 2. It is unclear how the property will be served with water and sewer facilities. The realtor handling the sale has talked to the Codiga family informally. He suggests an easement across some of our ad- joining property, but no definitive statements have been made. 3. The creek which separates the two Banchero parcels of property must be reckoned with. Its outfall is the Duwamish River. In or- der to make full use of the property, the creek would need to be bridged or diverted, a fact that may be important to Shoreline Man- agement requirements. Thanks for the chance to respond. Sincerely, `.w Frances C. North FCN :mvl PARKS& RECREATION • MEMORANDUM CPTY of `Q"UKWOLA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 27 April 1977 TO: Kjell Sto es, Responsible Official FROM: Fred Satterstrom SUBJECT: Allied Body Works Environmental Questionnaire With reference to the above - cited. proposal: — Environmental Questionnaire was submitted and accepted for filing on March 14, 1977. — King County Division of Hydraulics was consulted as an "agency with jurisdiction" on March 29, 1977. — Additional information was requested from the proposal sponsor by myself on March 30, 1977. — Proposal sponsor responded with additional information per my request on April 19, 1977. — King County Division of Hydraulics responded as an "agency with jurisdiction" on April 26, 1977. Based on the following considerations, I would recommend that an environmental impact statement be required:. 1. The change in land use from residential /agricultural to manu- facturing is a significant one for the site as well as the general vicinity. 2. Engineering has recommended an EIS be done because of access problems associated with private access road's intersection with Interurban Avenue. 3. There is a reasonable expectation of some sedimentation and turbidity impacts to Duwamish River as a result of construction and grading activities. FNS /cw . • : - • I • $4.4tUftc.x. - . 3.0 (Mt 1•1 1 • RIP RAP OR SPALLS RIVER BOTTOM NATURAL GROUND I 11 B.MIN.TOP OF SLOPE WIDTH t-0 t.MIN. TOE WIDTH 41-o" E.MIN. THICKNESS AT TOE OF SLOPE F. MAX.TOE ELEV. I FT BELOW RIVER BOTTOM K.MIN.THICKNESS OF TOE NAME OF PROJECT RIVER LOCATION % crl DATE " 3-0 -0 TITLE: RIP RAP WITHOUT LEVEE - I ITT SPECIFICATION ROCK RIP RAP 4o-So?. svo‘s - s 0 ZS -35 9. 5b111- I oo4 "LS-3S 9. 100'A-150'4 F i • Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 •3922 - 7th Ave South Seattle, Washington 98108 April 19, 1977 Re: Environmental Questionaire, Allied Body Works. Dear Mr. Satterstrom: As per your letter of March 30, 1977, the information you requested is as follows: 1. Earth. The off -site erosion, which may occur, would be due to the fill and grading required for on -site drainage and construction plus the slight increase in peripheral elevations to meet King. County Hydraulic's standards. This activity may cause some initial erosion during and immediately after construction until vegetation re- establishes itself around the perimeter. The erosion is likely to be minimal and probably will not enter the river, but some may enter the stream due to the culverting and filling of a portion of the stream bed. 2. Water. The stream which runs through the property is proposed to be entirely enclosed from the southern boundary of the property to the northern edge of the roadway grading with culverting (size to be determined by study underway) and fill. 3. Noise. The operation of Allied Body Works, Inc. will create minimal noise levels, due to occasional minor riveting done in the shop area, plus any noise caused by welding, use of cutting torches and drilling. - 4. Land Use. The agricultural activity occurring on this site in the past was truck cropping. The urbanization of this land should not have a greatly measurable impact on farming in the_general area, however, due to the small amount of farming done in Tukwila's immediate area, it may have a larger impact there. 5. Population. At present, only one of the three houses is occupied with one person living in it. All of these units will be removed from the site and /or demolished. Mr. Fred N. Satterstr• -2- 6. Transportation. April 19, 1977 During peak periods, there will be approximately 50 passenger cars or pick -up trucks using the site. In addition to that, there will be two tractor rigs in use on the site during working hours with approximately three to four large trucks In and out of the site during the average day: The proposed road along the river bank is planned as a private access road. We do not believe that the access road's intersection with Interurban Avenue, at its intended location, will cause any major traffic problems. 7. Utilities. The utilities presently lie along the Seattle City Light right of way, as shown in the accompanying plot plan (which was also submitted with the original Environmental Questionaire and Shorelines Management Substantial Development Permit application). The extension of all utilities, except sanitary sewers, will be in the planned roadway area. The sewers are proposed to be extended, as shown. Sincerely, Richard L. Minice REC EAT ION 30 March 1977 • CITY of T U KW I LA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Richard L. Minice 3922 - 7th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 Dear Mr. Minice: With regard to your Environmental Questionnaire submitted to this office on 14 March 1977 and pursuant to WAC 197- 10- 330(a) of Tukwila's SEPA guide- lines, we request that you provide additional information on the following points. We need this additional information before we can proceed with the threshold determination. 1. Earth: You mention in the Environmental Questionnaire that "off - site erosion" may occur. What is this off -site erosion due to? How much will occur and is it likely to enter the river or the stream on the property? 2. Water: How does the proposed development plan to treat the stream on the property? Will the entirety be enclosed? Will the stream be bridged by culvert /fill or a concrete /steel span? 3. Noise: Will there be noise created by the operations of Allied Body Works itself? If so, how much and what operations would cause this noise? 4. Land Use: What kind of agricultural activities have occurred on this site in the past (e.g., grazing, truck cropping, hothouses, etc). Will the urbanization of this land have any measureable impact on farming in the general area? 5. Population: How many persons currently live on the site? How many housing units are currently on the site? How many are occupied? Are all of these units proposed to be demolished? 6. Transportation: What is the expected number of vehicles which might use the site at peak periods? What types of vehicles will be using the site? Is the proposed road along the riverbank pro- posed as a private access road? Will the road's intersection with West Valley Highway cause traffic problems? 7. Utilities: Where do existing utility systems lie with respect to the subject property? What extension will have to occur, if any? 6230 Southcenter Boulevard a Tukwila, Washington 98188 111 (206) 242 -2177 Richard L. Minice Page 2 30 March 1977 As mentioned, this office needs the above information before we can proceed with a threshold determination. For your information, King County Depart- ment of Hydraulics is being consulted as an "agency with jurisdiction" in this matter. Except for the final decision on your Shoreline Permit, this request for additional environmental information will not have an effect on the normal processing of your permit application. Any final decision on the permit, however, will have to await compliance with SEPA. Please contact me if you have any questions or comment. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor FNS /cw cc: Kjell Stoknes Director, OCD Owen A. Bull William H. Houghton 29 March 1977 CITY ©f TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Larry Gibbons King County Department of Hydraulics 900 King County Administrative Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: PROPOSED ALLIED BODY WORKS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Gibbons: Enclosed please find a copy of the Environmental Questionnaire submitted by Richard L. Minice for the proposed Allied Body Works, Inc. along the Duwamish River in Tukwila, (SEE, Enclosure A). This matter is referred to you for consultation per SEPA regulations, WAC 197- 10 -330c, (SEE, Enclosure B). The subject property is located along the south bank of the Duwamish River in Sec. 10, T. 23 N., R. 4 E. in the City of Tukwila. The size of the site is approximately 11 acres. In order to evaluate the environmental significance of the proposed action, we need to know what the requirements of King County Hydraulics might be for such a project. Will access easements for dike maintenance be required? What treatment will be required for the stream which crosses the western portion of the property? Please provide us with any other information your department may have concerning this proposal which might help us in making a threshold determination. Your cooperatin in this matter is appreciated.' We will await your reply before making a threshold determination. Please try to transmit any comments or information you may have on this proposal to us within 15 days. Thank you. Fred Satterstrom Planning Supervisor FS /cw Enclosures: 6230 Southcenter Boulevard e Tukwila, Washington 98188 to (206) 742 -2177 • E• D. Bauch, Mayor rre7 • 0 T 1 LA 14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON 98067 8 March 1976 Mr. Jerome E. Mathews Kidder, James & Mathews 514 - 2nd Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 Dear Mr. Mathews: Thank you for your letter of 1 March 1976 describing the truck fabrication process we discussed over the telephone. It is the conclusion of this office, based on your description of the process and its correlation to the Tukwila Municipal Code, that the proposed use would be allowed at the address indicated in your letter which is zoned M -1 (Light Industry). Bear in mind that all outside storage of materials and products must be fenced. Please contact me at 242 -2177 should you desire any further information. Sincerely Gary Crutc Assistant GC /cw ield Tanner KIDDER, JAMES Si, MATHEWS, INC. 514 - 2nd AVENUE WEST SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 206/285 -3700 March 1, 1976 Mr. Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner City of Tukwila Planning Department 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Seattle, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Crutchfield: In accordance with our discussion on Friday, February 27, 1976, I am requesting that you provide us with a planning department opinion as to the potential qualification of our client under M -1 zoning. Our client deals in the wholesale sale and installation of truck and trailer equipment. Their activities include the mounting of vans on truck chassis. The only fabrication that they do is directly related to that activity. These light fabrication functions include painting, welding, riveting, use of cutting torches and drilling. Noise level of the client's activities is minimal. Riveting is the noisest element of their operation and only a minor amount is done. Most metal forming and punching operations are done for our client by outside shops and contractors. At this time the client is interested in occupying . the present Time D. C. maintenance facility, not the distribution building, located at 12855 - 48th South, in Tukwila. Thank you for your consideration of this request. JEM:sp Warm regards, �Jero-e E. Mathews INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE • SALES • LEASING • APPRAISING • CONSULTING _,T •'4, \..,-/e /t: \•. • —•� '. `•` - -' y • • G �Z • ‘C.CVN "C''\ • • _ 1 1 1.9�r'. is 4' 1' _.f• f�vit• ' /7-riv 1 f%OU7nr- !4D' geolude tl.l.... Gad • •■••11 R./ t...i. ,. 5•• sr. s •i1••d 2li• Q.. 1. e. (..1.. iw Mote.. •1 V•.r••6. • • ' Dto•1au0 (aoQ GK40/ ew. /4f. 21. 14o . Sectlo.t A..- 4. tab .:�•_%.. • I. • G.r. .T..•.4. i- 1, ►`/• /7■ HART, WILLIAMS & ROTH, INC 1 SURVEYORS ENGINEERS � J� KIRK SURVEYORS WASHINGTON (2081 822 -4171 .}LL IEV SGVY w ✓��� F,(1 Li 16.E BELL . t+OUGI.1TOI.L / 7s.dM1L, Wdet� R.ce,d.11 C.Ailicat. No filed for record this-day of 19 ol__a1. In eooh_ol pope_ at the r.gwlt of Manop.r Supt. of R.cordl 04.1 JA.1 AMID. JA.4 DAM C..4 V, MID •{. 7127 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE train, II MAR 14 1977 fl : OF 1UKWILA This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the city of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other forms have been developed for single- family home applications and legislation - proposal s. . • BACKGROUND DATA: 1. Name of applicant: Richard L..Minice, Owen A. Bull & William H. Houghton 2. Address and phone of Applicant:3922 - 7th Ave S, Seattle, WA 98108, 682 -652( 3. Project name: Future Lo a • f 4. Project location: South & East of Intersection 42ns Av S & -Interurban Av iong vuwamish Rivei. 5. Nature and brief description of proposal: Construction of building and yard on west 6 ac. of property with access road extending full length of roperty. 6. Estimated completion date: • September 30, 1977 7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: yes, remaining.apprx. 4.7 ac. .will be developed in'a similar fashion in future for additional user /owners 8.'What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this project? (a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES x NO (b) King County Nydr1olics Permit YES NO (c) Building' permit- . YES x NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control. Permit YES NO x (e) Sewer .hook .up permit YES x'. .NO (f) Sign permit __ YESx . NO (g) Water hook up permit YES x NO (h) Storm water system permit-- YES x NO (i) Curb cut permit YES x NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YESx NO permit (King . (k) Plumbing P g County) YES x ' NO (1) -- -Other •- Shorelines Mgmt permit 9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: no 10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Depa ent - 11. Accepted by agency on: 1� -by: (to be filled in by city upon receip o checkli •s • -• :•• .• • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes and "maybe" answers are required.) be No Maybe o Earth. Will.the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in any changes in geologic sub- structures: x (b) Disruptions, displacements or overcovering of the soils: (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or in changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed. of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Air. Will the proposal result in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (a) (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or in any change in climate, - either locally or regionally? Explanation: x • • Yes Maybe No dater. Will the proposal result in': (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the amount of surface water run- off? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any watercourse? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sur- face.'water quality, including temperature or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or .rate of flow of ground.waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an acquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection; or through the seep - age of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into-the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water. supplies ? - Explanation: x x x x ( • Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro -flora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of,the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a bar- rier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Explanation: Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including rep - tiles, fish and shellfish,.benthic organisms, insects, or micro - fauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? Explanation:' Noise. Will the proposal increase exist ing noise levels? Explanation: • • Yes Maybe No x x -x . x- x x • Light and Glare. .Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation:: Land Use. Will . the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land. use of an area? . . Explanation: Natural Resources. Will the proposal re- sult in: . • (a) Increase in the rate of use of any . natural resource? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat- ural resource? :. Explanation:.. Yes Maybe x. Risk of Upset.: Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil,. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: Population. Will the proposal alter the locationT distribution,, density, or- growth rate of the human population -of an-area? . Explanation: x Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing availability, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: Transportation /Circulation.. Will the pro- posal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to- waterborne or air . traffic? Explanation: • Yes x Local Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks? N(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 7MW7'7. /0" ;B s <e // ° e.0 -' t e-, d ex-. )-- Other'governmental services? Maybe No x x x (f) Explanation: x x Energy: Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: Utilities. Will' the proposal result in a need for _new_systems, _ or alterations to the follow- ing utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) .Water ?.. Ej(;1 ST { (..L9L l (d) Sewer or septic tanks? <..-011.,3 • �� p1�10 ti , :. 117 nutett. Seat (e) Storm water drainage? . (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation :..: Human Health. _ Will the proposal•result in the creation of any health hazard•or potential . health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation:. Yes Maybe No • x x x x • X• x • Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ex- isting recreational opportunities? Explanation: Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal • result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site? Explanation: r. Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi- cant.increase in city revenues? Explanation: • Employment. Will the proposal create a significant amount of new jobs? Explanation: Yes Maybe • No x • x • CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: • June 24, 1975 I hereby certify.that the information furnished in this environmental checklist sheet is true and accurate to the best. of my knowledge. Signature and Ti .e 1 • Project Name: ll ? tOCSUAC� Project Address: /tqa.4 QA. 1. BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION BY OTHER•DEPARTMENTS:. 1. Date of Review: Building -by. CO • or ( -) • Planning by: ) Engineering Q,SMA�,.�^% bY:� CO (+) or In .46.).A.. or ( -) by: CO or (-) CO or (-) =Check one Police Fire by : • Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: :The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and. Title .of Responsible Official•. . Date 3. Applicant was notified of decision on: Date 'by Staff Person ...Letter, phone by In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukti,iila Ordinance No.. 759. (+) Means recommend a full environmental' impact statement be-done. • •( -)• Means recommend a full environmental impact statement'not'be'done. Earth Air Water Flora EXPLAN•ON FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMP. b) There will be removal of approximately one foot of topsoil, and addition of a non - organic free draining compactable backfill, plus pre - loading in building site area, with subsequent paving and buildings on site. c) There will be grading to allow for proper on and off-site drainage, and addition of backfill to the minimum 100 year flood level requirements, not to exceed 4 to 6 feet in low areas. e) There may be the possibility of some initial offsite erosion due to alteration of drainage patterns. f) The culverting of the small stream on the site may cause some alteration of siltation, disposition and erosion of subject water course. a) Possible additional increases in air emmissions due to a . slight increase of traffic in the area, resulting from a change in land usage on the site, may occur. b) Due to the paving of the yard areas and construction of buildings on the site, direct absortion rates, drainage patterns, and surface water runoff will be altered. c) Due to the culverting of the small stream on the site and increased ground elevations in accordance with King County Hydraulics, along the perimeter of the site, some flow of flood water may be altered. d) There may be possible increase in surface water in the Duwamish River because of direct discharge of storm water into the river, rather than the adjacent water table. e) The discharge of storm waters into the Duwamish River from the site after collection in sump- separator during heavy rains may alter surface water quality slightly. f) The rate of flow of ground waters may be altered slightly by paving of the site, thereby reducing indirect additions thereto. g) There may be some change in quantity of ground waters by the paving and the buildings on the site, thereby slightly reducing indirect additions. a) Due to the change of property usage from agricultural to commercial- industrial usage, there will be a change in the diversity of species of flora, through the removal of crops and incidental grasses, weeds and micro -flora presently on site. c) Normal replenishment of existing species of flora on site will be barred by paving and buildings to be constructed on the site. Fauna Noise a) Due to the removal of existing crops and replacing these with a paved yard area and buildings on the site, there will be a change in the diversity of species and numbers of species of fauna on the site. d) There may be some deterioration of existing wildlife habitat on the site by the removal of crops and the addition of paving and buildings on the site. There may be some increase in the noise levels of the area by additional- vehicular travel to and -on -the- site-. -- Light and Glare There will be some additional light in the area due to yard and building lighting. Land Use The land use will change from the agricultural usage presently carried out on the site, to the commercial- industrial usage it is presently zoned for. Population The development may alter the population of the area due to the_presence of new business in the area.-- Transportation There will be the additional vehicular traffic of the new commercial-industriaLusage . Revenue Due to the addition of new commercial - industrial business in 'the area by development of the site, there will be some increase in City revenue. Employment Due to the addition of new commercial - industrial business on this site, there may be an increase in new jobs in the area. c.9 /vet/01 %m� o peo. n, .vise /91 79 vas ��� —m,1-` �.-i �; 6.J.. ' +Ir! / —'�` J I 41 'nf . ./s\„.., . 1eR.Ma t /tiv 7.44 1h1 1 to ,040.00.reD 4,4o Gt•101 Ewr /a 7' ZJ6' ° '7,5 C' /7aorA1,1' Oe /ori% f3rX2/ //ovoc .:%WC's .44.97,441.£-' tJt MN�9_ Zed O- /d /Y .6 /o' Px1sTo -O EA..fise /7- Paeoos*o HART, WILLIAMS & ROTH, INC O� KIRKSURVEYORS ENGINEERS LAND, WASHINGTON (208) 822 -4171 ALL-1E17 SOQY WOIZY.' ly(IUIGE., SELL ++OUG+ITOI.I. 39LZ• 7 Ate, *cattle., Wd-,h. Recorder's Certificate No filed for neon/ thia__daf of 19_ al �. In look_--af f page at the nguest of Manager Supt. of Records ouww NOM wn ros AO PAAAIN STALLS • F.R. LINDELL & ASSOCIATE AS AMENDED _.I•.A0. AS 471 ALLIED BODY WORKS NAS6A. YOOY/O1 ROT PLAN & LEGAL OESCRPT WIC SOUTH ELEVATION �, 11 I P1111;11.1%4 - . i;�a i III 111: Itt Ii.. III„�i! �,i' I I �� Id �.'�. I � '3' 3 I I .1i I i.•�':_: Ili III I�I; L ., �u !' I. I►i wl I: .11111 lii1jI 1' II I�, � 1 !illy .1;0 1 ,L,.g I i� �L =',:,. Iq.11p„ I ` :I�i1i;1!I,. I,., �i�l' .,1 Lu ' I' II !'I l.!, I. Ill j�l �;1 1111 I .i11 ;p' I' I'� l,i41 II �;Ip. .;• I I �� "h' I, ;;I , I � I:I;��,i 1I' "I(''''I� Iy' 1 iI��;I I�'I !1 II! II• ' �I I'II 1I ili, ��1 III I;: (Ii i� ..I u1t--•- °�I I ; II I ll ' !I IiIIIi 11 Ill Ili 1111 1 III1!i, I' :1 li l y 1 I1 I F H P H II {, , �`�� I �- • I �1. iFi s ❑ j:Ij I: n !I WEST ELEVATION u Ili?'I l l�•',ci; 1 ;i, ,1.5 !��: I P1111;11.1%4 - . i;�a i III 111: Itt Ii.. III„�i! �,i' I I �� Id �.'�. I � '3' 3 I I .1i I i.•�':_: Ili III I�I; L ., �u !' I. I►i wl I: .11111 lii1jI 1' II I�, � 1 !illy .1;0 1 ,L,.g I i� �L =',:,. Iq.11p„ I ` :I�i1i;1!I,. I,., �i�l' .,1 Lu ' I' II !'I l.!, I. Ill j�l �;1 1111 I .i11 ;p' I' I'� l,i41 II �;Ip. .;• I I �� "h' I, ;;I , I � I:I;��,i 1I' "I(''''I� Iy' 1 iI��;I I�'I !1 II! II• ' �I I'II 1I ili, ��1 III I;: (Ii i� ..I u1t--•- °�I I ; II I ll ' !I IiIIIi 11 Ill Ili 1111 1 III1!i, I' :1 li l y 1 I1 NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION F.R. LINDELL & ASSOCIATES ,.'. ,•,. AWED BODY WORKS ,I..ry.. .Y.Ia070. ELEVATIONS A-� 11 4 0 I I I �•' ! ' !I IiIIIi 11 Ill Ili 1111 1 III1!i, I' :1 li l y 1 I1 I F H P H II {, , �`�� I �- • I �1. n EAST ELEVATION F.R. LINDELL & ASSOCIATES ,.'. ,•,. AWED BODY WORKS ,I..ry.. .Y.Ia070. ELEVATIONS A-� 11 4 0 TRANS S 112 ST , G S 113 ST S ii4 ST 115 S 01 II/ / 110800 S LEO AVON - 1- S FOUNTAIN 27' ST I4200 3 c SI 7e 111•11•■■ P 73 —0 ) --°' Z P r ST 118 SIIBP 0 . 5119 S > S < 12, 5 cvl (.0! CK9 > \ 7■--■/1/ — , > Campbe 125 ST S I26\ST ST (i) 0 9 EXIT 156 : 3 ',1 — 1 3 ,\\ 3T _ 1..c) N- 7'0 re) ST S 138 S 134 County Park Site S\ 137 yr-4 > (I) --.139_ < >. ST<i 1c), -04 / ;<clve,- s —'c c4. sssfI3 eit2- 65,-11,,,, i' Teli>/ir > entra E row 1140 c° ST < h s t 11/44O—STI ) S 141 (nr - ST EXIT 156 - 1 > > S142 ST , > q , I42 PL 1 .41 u) ,,r--NDShotw,a tjt- FolLer 44 .' 1 , SrIpSchl Jr Hi SchV \ !ST ry 7.............. 4. ,...;),..-) )0 i t,s 4V141-agt.: S6' c<\ S S 14 DUWA/N EN GENERAL NOTES /. R /VER EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90 %• OF. •MAX /MUM • DENS /Ty /N: /2'LAVERS T0-I41/TH /N .2" OP TOP OPOAN/{: TOP 2'SHALL. • BE COMPACTED To 95%:•. -2. LOCATION SHOWN, OF EXISTING 0 T /L /TIES. :AREAPPROX /MATE, -7T SHALL BE. THE RESPONSIBILITY OF.THE CONTRACTOR. TO VERI Y 77/E CORRECT LOCAT /DNS -50AS TO AVO /D. DAMAGE OR 0/5TURBANGE. 3. ALL WOR/( AND MATERIALS -HALL• BE IN ACCORDANCE. W/TN 'CITY OF TUKW /LA STANDARDS AND.JPEC /F /CAT /DNS. • 4, CONCRETE PIPE (CP) SHALL BE CONCRETE NON - REINFORCED, RUBBER - GASKETEO,• A5TM C -/t CL:2, AND CORRI /GATED METAL P /PE (CMP) SHALL: BE AA-S//1 M - /9G, M -/97, HEL ICAL, 144GAGE..•: • .. • 5. INLET AND. CATCH.BAS /N F.PAMES AND 'GRATES. SHALL; OE ADJUSTED • TO' P/N /SHED. GRAPE, PRMR 7P POOR/NG OF CONCRETE GURE G GUTTER. G. - PROVIDE ANO MA INTA /N.TE4IA7RARY.SED /MENTAT /ON. COLLECTION FAC /L - • /T/E5 .TOINSURE 5F�/MENT LADEN%WATER 00E5 NOT ENTER. 771E NATURAL • • ORA /NAGS .SYSTEM. THESE FAULT /E5 MUST OE IN OPERAT /ON PR /OR 70 .CL EARING A/VO BUILDING: C2W5TRUCT /ON,- AND SATISFACTORILY MAIN - TA /NED UNTIL 'CONSTRUCT /ON AND LANOSCAP /NG ARE COMPLETED _AND THE POTENT /AL OF ON -5/TE ER05 /ON HAS PASSED • - .7-DUCT/LE ./RON PIPE /O.l.)SM4LL ESE .4445552,CEMENT:LINED.ANO' ._ SHALL CONFORM TO ANSI_ .42/5/. : ; : - •... C � s (,011• m NiG %75 E5 if5'- rY[.ry1v 4 1 ..0- 224745 .'.\ v R 300 L //9.35 5tih° \ I ti\ tit 2221 Ben:0 0' Q . \ \• \ - /G 6 1 aocc/ 1 /0.0. ✓. /07x 9O.OEND c :O"x.G Trb- ff tG.4,. 15.9. )01;4-TEE - 5r N/ ✓o NYDIACC. y ^Srtlet\— .—. My iN` s / i 1.. \ \ \ \, CONNECT: 70 EI � �(ST- ' \ \. . METRO.,{V/ANHO4E '.'.. �\ \ \" 8. /NV 4.45 ' \- /8.SE. 52 .'.... \- PREL IMINARY NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. JUN 71977 - 11.1307. PROJECT AREA WC /N /TY MAP o ClRSBI— O..6 -2 -77 ALLIED, BODY WORKS UTILITIES. AND SITE PLAN. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON HART,WILLIAMS'-& ROTH,.INC. �Na�N�... •URV[TDN6-• N111NLwND. Ww6NiHOTO N' • ITPLL'.ldV f0v fp�• •f�ft• 0•� s •ff oa ■wilw MN p�- t•��ar• pppp�pppppppp pppp- plri!_ f!•p�41•t•��flaf•� •f�tu•rTmmw. pppp • �• � •�•ee� •�o_ , ' — — — _ � • ..-iii f a� = =L_ �!•ae�p�•. 'ice • _ • Mill —e •t•� pppp•■ OffR•�•f�� ppppl•■ - ��if -O _ iip�pppp�� ~ eff� MI '�tlirriTes -�" -- _�� W. •— rQJMIN=MIIIppO• fie RppN�ff�I --,-.. .. t —f>_� �. _ � � 5 ' — � r p p p e ._ p p p p p p p p I e�ppO�MMIN■ ppppp - - ' °W'' % =MO �rr-rrs --∎ •mss -� •enn - ► !• - •drums• - -^ - I im• � ,n• �. __ =e•...� r®�amr r.rlpfr_sfap►�y•s�i.nir. r.Ms n r lea; efe� La�iui�ppp•p���yi• .yfi _■111111 /AK 9.55 !6 /A4+5,42 AVk 6.45 •JA I r —Ir II r �y►.r. ®A r V �1f % —t♦�� J. PARKING ;AREA ` t•R�r' — jam / "EIATTER C SL12.0$ _ .• SL. 2.07 4 CRUSHED . GRAVEL 3 iNdY. COMPT. DEPTH, CLASS -Er ASPHALTIC CONCRETE /.4 HI /N. COMPT. OEPTH, CRUSHED SURFACING., TOP COURSE .2127$1 IN. comer DEPTH, CRUSHED SURFACING, 845E COURSE GRAVEL BASE CLASS 6; MAY BE REDO PENDING SO /L.CONDIT /ON VERT /CAL CURB SECT /ON NOT TO SCALE LID, OLYMPIC FOUNDRY NO. 543.5; OFFSET WHERE OPEN /NG /5 DIRECT- LY OVER LADDER F SEPARATOR /5 VISIBLE e ONE' E DV E OF GRATE' 7 CHA /N, 2OOLB. CAPAC /TY 5LACH WHEN GATE/ SL /DE /S DOWN. - - .WATERMAN C-2 D /STROUT /ON 64TE • _ W /B GAUGE SL/DE TYP /CAL ROADWAY SECT /ON NOT TO SCALE TOP Of GRATE EL./5.5 .• STANDARD GAL< LADDER STEPS (TYPICAL) 54-CATCH BAS /AI CATCH BAS /N NO.5 0/L SEPARATOR DETA /L NOT ,TO SCALE -. - PRELIMINARY NOT NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION wN _ 7 1977 Deert C6 /"...50‘ e .N R58 APPVe • 4 -2 -77 R. 7727 ALLIED BODY =WORKS PROFILES :&.SECTIONS:.:. TUKWILA, - .WASHINGTON HART,WILLIAMS & ROTH, INC: RNOINRRRR • R.NRY RYOR6, . KIRKLAND. WARMINOTON a. OP- .2 I. RIVER EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90% OF MAX /MUM DENSITY . /N /Z"LAYERS TO WITHIN 2'DF TOP OF.BCNIP. TOP2'SHALL' : :- BE.COMPACTED'.TO 93%, . 2 LOCATION SHOWN, OF EXIST /NG UT /L /T /EB'ARE APPROXIMATE, /7. SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF 771E CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY 77/E- CORRECT LOCATIONS SO A5 TO.AVO /D DAMAGE OR 0/5TURBANCE. 3. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE'.. WITH CITY OF TUKW /LA STANDARDS AND SPEC /F /CAT /OHS.' ." $ CONCRETE P /PE (CP) SHALL. 'BE:'CONCRETE NON - REINFORCED, RUBBER GA5/CETED, ASTM C -/. CG -.Z ANC. CORR/MATEO METAL P/PE(CMPJ- SHALL BE AASHTO M -/9G, 41= /97,:NEL /CAL, I4 GAGE:. 5. INLET AND CATCH BA5 /N FRAMES AND GRATES SHALL BE ADJUSTED 70 F7N /SHED' GRADE, PR/OR.'To POURING OF CONCRETE caw GUTTF.Z.. G. PROVIDE AND MA /NTA /N TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION COLLECT /ON FAC /L - /T/E5 TO INSURE 5ED /MENT LADEN "WATER 00E5 NOT ENTER 77IE NATURAL ORR /NAGE .SYSTEM. THE5E FACILITIES MUST BE /N OPERAT ION PR /OR TO CLEARING. AND B0 /LD /NG CUNSTRUCT /ON, . AND SATISFACTORILY MA /N- TA/NED UNTIL: CONSTRUCTION AND. LANDSCAPING ARE COMPLETED' AND THE POTENTIAL OF 0N- 5 /TE'ER05 /0Nt11,45 PASSED N \ \ \;" r' . b9r �.�.. era • " h� • • .EE NO F .1 II - RL° 3 09ti 77;t:\. \ H. 1625 1. ,C • F. f, rco • ,5:9 DATUM USC4GS ME, ALI.) N.-�y PROJECT.' AREA - RIM WO onicrorno u C ✓.G. 7"-' 50. oA.G -2 -77 �... ,'Q 7727 ALLIED" BODY: WORKS_.: UTILITIES" :: AND : SITE PLAN: TUKWILA,-. WASHINGTON- HART.WI"LLIAMS & ROTH, INC. SNG IteRS • SURVEYORS PLANNERS • "KIRKE/040.. WASHINGTON z MRIBSWY. ssstii t1.3.'4— L'. V 1.1\MS•tirH■4•1\ /NI. - - I.MIMurrM111rr1MIMmrM■�r; u ■ L 1.`••••11c -vAMM�4 •1■MrrvrfsMM•IM MIlli ■MIO�t�����— ■. BM�MC- :mss - -�1.■ ■�� VG'S - - -� \`11∎1 ■�_��.tf�e■fi�� Ml ■ ®����■■■■e��a eel ■fa1 — r■f•�1VM! ® —_ ■ M••∎•∎ e — _—M. OM ■■■S. IM �.M■• —m -■f — ,- --- ---- -- -MME 1 • M■ tt�■■MMt♦MM- ■fa \� ■■fs���i� to = ■i 1111 ■i! ■, �M ■ ■rMMMM —M� ■ ■1 MMM■ M■ ■�:a■�MMM�a� I r ll —■■�0 • ■MML \ ■���MMMJ•:r• CLYI MM= ■fsi ■ ■■fs �■ ■ ■r.w= —_ ■fa�mia/la•■=.1r ■ MME��t•� ■ Mi��■: raa ■■ -- I! MINN / M■. ■MMMU►MMEIMIMMOI M ■M MMM■ IMMVINIMI MMM ■DMM�IIMSI MUM �MI ■ —_ sl MC IN MI II V ill iii Mrs Eia■��� ••••1111• tau �V■ • • - ■a� -1 ear rr�� LISxml■nomY61mom 3.'J•� ar.Of■�t♦J rr.lssiUNIIIIM•••••1111 aLIMM■AlLVf —M lr ■ sir ■11=1. aw ■��arAI■ r` ■•��Zig n• •••■•10•MEOw r.rr��I■ rim •ia�rn 1M•I I .••1111111111111111=11C7•• 0�O -. Ialon fit," i ■■r ..�Mr. Mr_ ntrr.7■ --sue SS'+JLSZ /ir • ■111•Nre.i-i-IS■TL' LJ 1I /J = t•.T■S.tai -- =r r•- - e•±rarra� —' ■laf6La r.4.r . -•. - rr% - z,?I.rr■ ■■af1 •. "rl _Sam sMreivret ; _ ..IrYn 7il1frl. s/ALL [. ,1111 WP/rIa111■1■1•111 sulauocs• — 7 w r MIMr r =Mr/V r NW r ■r r MIIMMMIMEM= ■ rM ��. .I■ L. ��L'V• •, •,fir• ■' •��•1777r17 MOEN O d4 •r ■••l ,7/1111L,Iy/.I /•yi i ■ 1� • AISIMMNI / BATTER VERT/CAL CURB SECT /ON NOT TO SCALE. \•• —�>i_i - �= IMIM=1■'11 - erw■ww■■■ ■s�MIEN - - ..r•7a'ir riainvsr IMMad -- ■�� ■- ■ rao.3f17;4I.Jfl 5 •74.11/1I• BIOS LSII■ENL11221i.. • e vii aPu 50•R /VER PROTECT /ON ESMT. 'ii 3:M/N cawPT. DEPTH, CL455 B• ASPHALT /C.CONC.ETE /%Y M /N. COMPT. PEPTN,CRUSHED SURFAC /NG, TOP. COURSE 212-M /N. com er DEPTH, CRUSHED SURFACING, BASE COURSE GRAVEL BASE, CLASS B; MAY BE RECP PEND/N6 SO /L COND /T /ON TYP /CAL ROADWAY SECT /ON NOT TO SCAL E RE OATS RUMS ONioN • [VISIONS ALLIED BODY 'WORKS PROFILES Ba.SECTIONS TUKWILA, ..WASHINGTON RotR,CG R,..,RSB I...... 6 -2 -77 �• 7727 111 HART,WILLIAMS &'ROTH, INC ERO iNESRS • SURVEYORS •' KIRKLAND. WASRINGTON c �sr >. {1, Ger.l77: 2.1,k,„, K Sow S¢!ti.e 911xil. Bf.ie. - (uW. 4.1c NCl$N 44 .9,eparki :> IART;WILLIAMS'& ROTI- ,IN 'SURVEYORS - ,: ENGINEERS KIRK' AN1'1 WAQW11■1rTrN , 39�Z 7 4YL..�J' �7c d f+l 2� Wd� Ft Recorder's Certificate No Filed for record this doy of 19 of M: in:Book of at page at the request of DRAWN SCALE APPVD.. JA►i ELD. 6K..': DATE 4th 7 'l JOB