Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-30 - KETCHUM HENRY - SAN JUAN APARTMENT ADDITIONSAN JAUN APTS ADDITION HENRY KETCHAM S 153 EPIGFD -30 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /FINAL • . • . , l • WITHDRAWAL OF DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal San Juan Apartment Addition Proponent Henry and William Ketchum Location of Proposal. South 153rd Street, north of San Juan Apartments Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FDL42 This proposal has been determined to ( /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title O.C.D. Director Date 16 August 1977 Signature COMMENTS: Withdrawal subject to: 1. Implementation of landscape plan. 2. Submission of signed developer's agreement on street. 3. Implementation of other conditions imposed on 27 July 1977, as attached to the original proposed "Declaration of Significance ". 3 August 1977 CITY of TUKWILA . OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. W. P. Ketcham 1661 East Olive Way Seattle, Washington 98112 RE: Environmental review of your SanJuan Apartment addition Dear Mr. Ketchum: I talked with Mr. Dick Hammons on August 2, 1977, and are working out the details of how to achieve items 1-9 of the attached sheet. Item 10 has been dropped based upon a discussion with Mr. George Wannamaker of King County Hydrolics Division. He has indicated he will personally review the above items with me before the end of the week and also seek out some information from you. As soon as we have reached agreement on what to do in writing, I will authorize release of the building permit. I am sending this letter to you since I do not have Mr. Hammons address. Perhaps you will forward a copy to him. Sincerely, Kj_11 Stoknes Re •onsible Official KS /cw cc: Al Pieper EPIC File (Ketchum) Attachment 6230 Southcenter Boulevard u Tukwila, Washington 98188 a (206) 242 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED/4+h6 llECLARATIOi1 OF SIGNIFICANCE /„ ;: T ►I ICAO;& Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency SanJuan Apartment Addition Henry and William Ketcham South 153rd Street north of SanJuan Apts. City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD This proposal has been determined to (have /, ,. ) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment.. An EIS (is /) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2). (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title O.C.D. Director Date • 28 July 1977 Signature COMMENTS See attached sheet for potential measures which could be taken to mitigate the environmental impacts. *Note: If action on mitigating factors is not substantially completed by August 12, 1977, this proposed declaration shall become final. Mailed to applicant: 28 July 1977 . • 27 July 1977 SanJuan Apartment Addition South 153rd Street North of SanJuan Apartments 1. Developers agreement to be executed, filed, and to include no parking on South 153rd Street. This agreement also is to provide a public access easement over the area designated for future dedication. 2. Grading plan to be submitted showing how bank adjacent and north of single - family home is to be stabilized. 3. Exterior building materials to be stated. 4. A total landscape plan is to be submitted to the City for approval, including site screening to the north. 5. Placement of garbage containers and proposed screening to be shown on landscape plan. 6. No parking - fire lane is to be posted on all internal driveways and roads, including South 153rd Street. 7. Easement through SanJuan complex to new complex to be provided or legal to be revised to include SanJuan Apartment Complex. 8. Screen parking area in northeast corner by an evergreen hedge per TMC/ 18.56.070 (2) and show in landscape plan. 9. Parking area to be revised to eliminate two parking spaces on driveway turn at southeast corner of lot. 10. ! • r..... - . - - ' . .. 1 ow-sys t-effh-te -be sub T1 tt2d _tn tha Pala l. . s -.. -- -- • 1 • •e . ma i-nta i n ed-. • • ' , . • #. • er -.--Cs 1 cu 1 a t iofs- o-i=-pr n t--rrmr o f- -a-re- to b.e pro v i d ed_ and --i; fie-€ s-t_1 m a t e- -_ d r_no_ff_a f ter_le ei°- a • 2-5 -yea -r -stem. Mea_surei_li`mi t outflow. o-greserrt- eond -i ti ons urcr a 2-5-yeai—st i - e-4,-- 1) ro-efe4 'im•-ri - fe4- A, et.,,Eur,- tiuot,z, qA 04,1_. a,,......„.„...)„,,. . (46„ . ,r;Nr(N- PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, executed this date in favor of the City of Tuk- wila, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, (herein called "CITY "), by William P. Ketcham and Henry H. Ketcham, Jr. (herein called "OWNER "), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the owner in fee simple of the following de- scribed property, hereinafter called the "PROPERTY ": Lot 18, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, records of King County, Washington, located in Tukwila, King County, Washington; and WHEREAS, Owner desires to dedicate a right -of -way and said im- provements upon said right -of -way; and WHEREAS, the City is desirous that a street be constructed and improved to City Standards for the general use by the public in accordance with this Property Use and Development Agreement, herein called the "AGREE- MENT "; NOW, THEREFORE, 1. The Owner hereby covenants, bargains and agrees to the following covenants and conditions on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns: a. To deed, without cost and without reservation or restriction, to the City of Tukwila a strip of land 30 feet in . width along the south boundary of the subject property. This 30 foot strip will be combined with a 20 foot strip deeded to the City by the property owner directly South of 153rd and will provide a street 50 feet wide. The OWNER will pay the cost for filling, grading, paving and drainage on only the 30 foot strip that the OWNER deeds to the City. However, the OWNER will co- operate with the property owners on the South of 153rd, as they fill, grade and pave the 20 foot strip that they deed to the City. The subject property will not be deeded to the City until such time as improvements are completed and accepted . by the City to City Standards. IPTo remove the direct access king lot located near the southeast corner of said Lot 18 which street is improved. c. To pay an equitable share of, not only the improvement of the street, but all costs arising out of the modification of the intersection of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street to provide for adequate sight distance and any other changes deemed necessary by the City for the protection of the public safety. d. To comply with the above covenants and conditions no later than when the adjacent property south of South 153rd Street is required to be developed in accordance with the terms and condi- tion of the Property'Use and Development Agreement dated February 5, 1968, between the City and Mrs. R. M. Wingate, recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 6318166 and attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. e. As an interim measure, prior to improvement and dedica- tion of the 30 foot strip identified in section la above, the owner grants a public access easement over said land. This agreement binds the owner to the above referenced easement. 2. This Agreement shall be effective immediately and recorded in the records of King County Department of Records and Elections and the covenants herein shall be deemed to attach to and run with the land and shall be binding upon the Covenantor, his successors and assigns. 3. The City may institute and prosecute any proceedings at law or equity to enforce this Agreement, and Owner agrees to pay reasonable attorney's fees expended by the City for such enforcement proceedings. 4. It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant, condition or restriction hereinabove contained or any partition thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 1977. CITY OF TUKWILA OWNER By: Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor By: William P. Ketcham, a single man ATTEST: ATTEST: By: Maxine Anderson, City Clerk By: By: Henry H. Ketcham, Jr. ATTEST: By: Nancy K. Ketcham, his wife ATTEST: By: By: • • PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, executed this date in favor of the City of Tuk- wila, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, (herein called "CITY "), by William P. Ketcham and Henry H. Ketcham, Jr. (herein called "OWNER "), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the owner in fee simple of the following de- scribed property, hereinafter called the "PROPERTY ": Lot 18, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, records of King County, Washington, located in Tukwila, King County, Washington; and WHEREAS, Owner desires to dedicate a right -of -way and said .im- provements upon said right -of -way; and u-="''''' WHEREAS, the City is desirous that a street be constructed and improved to City Standards for the general use by the public in accordance with this.Property Use and Development Agreement, herein called the "AGREE- MENT"; NOW, THEREFORE, 1. The Owner hereby covenants, bargains and agrees to the following covenants and conditions on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns: a. To deed, without cost and without reservation or restriction, to the City of Tukwila a strip of land 30 feet in width along the south boundary of the subject property. This 30 foot strip will be combined with a 20 foot strip deeded to the City by the property owner directly South of 153rd and will provide a street 50 feet wide. The OWNER will pay the cost for filling, grading, paving and drainage on only the 30 foot strip that the OWNER deeds to the City. However, the OWNER will co- operate with the property owners on the South of 153rd, as they fill, grade and pave the 20 foot strip that they deed to the City. The subject property will not be deeded to the City until such time as improvements are completed and accepted by the City to City Standards. • • b. To remove the direct access parking lot located near the southeast corner of said Lot 18 which street is improved. c. To pay an equitable share of, not only the improvement of the street, but all costs arising out of the modification of the intersection of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street to provide for adequate sight distance and any other changes deemed necessary by the City for the protection of the public safety. d. To comply with the above covenants and conditions no later than when the other portion of the subject South 153rd Street is required to be developed in accordance with the terms and condi- tion of the Property Use and Development Agreement dated February 5, 1968, between the City and Mrs. R. M. Wingate, recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 6318166 and attached hereto. as Exhibit A and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. This agreement is effective only if building permit is received within 30 days from below date for present application on land north of existing buildings. e. As an interim measure, prior to improvement and dedica- tion of the 30 foot strip identified in section la above, the owner grants a public access easement over said land. This agreement binds the owner to the above referenced easement. 2. This Agreement shall be recorded in the records of King County Department of Records and Elections and the covenants herein shall be deemed to attach to and run with the land and shall be binding upon the Covenantor, his successors and assigns. 3. The City may institute and prosecute any proceedings at law or equity to enforce this Agreement, and Owner agrees to pay reason- able attorney's fees expended by the City for such enforcement pro- ceedings. 4. It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant, condition or restriction hereinabove contained or any partition thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained. SIGNED THIS CITY OF TUKWILA DAY OF , 1977. OWNER By: Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor By: Willaim P. Petcham, a single man ATTEST: By: Maxine Anderson, City Clerk By: Henry H. Ketcham, Jr. ATTEST: By: ATTEST: �1 . Ketcham, his wife 8 August 1977 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Larry Hard LeSourd, Patten, Fleming & Hartung 1300 Seattle Tower Seattle, Washington 98101 Dear Larry: Would you give the attached proposed "Property Use and Development Agreement" a review? My main concerns are: 1. Does the agreement adequately state when action should occur? 2. Is there adequate understanding regarding what the property owners responsibilities are? 3. Does a public access easement as stated in le of the agreement im- pose any additional liabilities to the City? If so, to what extent? I will not recommend the Mayor sign this until I hear from you nor will I authorize the issuance of a building permit, which there is presently pres- sure from the applicant to get. Sincerely, OC 11 tok e Director KS /cw cc: Mayor Attachment: Agreement e/ftzc-weke) 1/10414 y /°"Q o-„ 41'1. C, ign. a . llet--d fll-- Q 140,,c1- sko-uDd' Te 4;4 ..�,«O��y w,yh Ito Cevtd - be-o. 6230 Southcenter Boulevard m Tukwila, Washington 98188 m (206) 242-2177 •• PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, executed this date in favor of the City of Tuk- wila, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, (herein called "CITY"), by William P. Ketcham and Henry H. Ketcham, Jr. (herein called "OWNER "), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the owner in fee simple of the following de- scribed property, hereinafter called the "PROPERTY ": Lot 18, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, records of King County, Washington, located in Tukwila, King County, Washington; and WHEREAS, Owner desires to dedicate a right -of -way and said im- provements upon said right -of -way; and WHEREAS, the City is desirous that a street be constructed and improved to City Standards for the general use by the public in accordance with this Property Use and Development Agreement, herein called the "AGREE- MENT"; NOW, THEREFORE, 1. The Owner hereby covenants, bargains and agrees to the following covenants and conditions on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns: a. To deed, without cost and without reservation or restriction, to the City of Tukwila a strip of land 30 feet in width along the south boundary of the subject property. This 30 foot strip will be combined with a 20 foot strip deeded to the City by the property owner directly South of 153rd and will provide a street 50 feet wide. The OWNER will pay the cost for filling, grading, paving and drainage on only the 30 foot strip that the OWNER deeds to the City. However, the OWNER will co- operate with the property owners on the South of 153rd, as they fill, grade and pave the 20 foot strip that they deed to the City. The subject property will not be deeded to the City until such time as improvements are completed and accepted by the City to City Standards. p a�T<i n., b. To remove the direct access g lot located near the southeast corner of said Lot 18 which street is improved. c. To pay an equitable share of, not only the improvement of the street, but all costs arising out of the modification of the intersection of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street to provide for adequate sight distance and any other changes deemed necessary by the City for the protection of the public safety. d. To comply with the above covenants and conditions no later than when the other portion of the subject South 153rd Street is required to be developed in accordance with the terms and condi- tion of the Property. Use and Development Agreement dated February 5, 1968, between the City and Mrs. R. M. Wingate, recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 6318166 and attached hereto. as Exhibit A` and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. This agreement is effective only if building permit is received within 30 days from below date for present application on land north of existing buildings: e. As an interim measure, prior to improvement and dedica- tion of the 30 foot strip identified in section la above, the owner grants a public access easement over said land. This agreement binds the owner to the above referenced easement. 2. This Agreement shall be recorded in the records of King Count;%. Department of Records and Elections and the covenants herein shall be deemed to attach to and run with the land and shall be binding upon the Covenantor, his successors and assigns. 3. The City may institute and prosecute any proceedings at law or equity to enforce this Agreement, and Owner agrees to pay reason- able attorney's fees expended by the City for such enforcement pro - ceedings. 4. It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant' condition or restriction hereinabove contained or any partition there& is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 1977.° • CITY OF TUKWILA OWNER By: Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor By: Willaim P. Petcham, a single man ATTEST: ATTEST: By: Maxine Anderson, City Clerk By: By: Henry H. Ketcham, Jr By: Nancy K. Ketcham, his wife ATTEST: K(Lt it-7-7 -1-1411-;K_ C.IJC c. as.., l u e, WO- - 6 CA L1 70-0 re— pet E^a /v/a I A PevLiar3 We_ G 00 (CI t- f� �� e4 ala ice) llv ..� • Imo' (. `_ ,22 • 6 b�'77 PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, executed this date in favor of the City of Tukwila, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, (herein called "CITY "), by William P. Ketcham and Henry H. Ketcham, Jr. (herein called "OWNER "), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the owner in fee simple of the following described property, hereinafter called the "PROPERTY ": Lot :1.8.,..Inte.rurban Addition to Seattle, according: to plat recorded in Volume 10'. of Plats, .Rage 55, records of King County,' Washington, located in Tukwila, King County, Washington; and WHEREAS, Owner desires to dedicate a right -of -way and said improvements upon said right -of -way; and WHEREAS, the City is desirous that a street be constructed and improved to City Standards for the general use by the public in accordance with this Property. Use and Development Agreement, herein called the "AGREEMENT "; NOW, THEREFORE, 1a. The Owner hereby covenants, bargains and agrees to the following covenants and conditions on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns: a. To deed, without cost and without reservation or restriction, . to the City of Tukwila a strip of land 30 feet in width along the south boundary of the subject property. This 30 foot strip will be combined with a 20 foot strip deeded to the City by the property owner directly South of 153rd and will provide a street 50, feet wide. The OWNER will pay the cost for filling, grading, paving and drainage on only the 30 foot strip that the OWNER deeds to the City. However, the OWNER will cooperate with the. property owners on the South of 153rd, as they fill, grade and pave the 20 foot strip that they deed to the City. The subject property will not be deeded to the City until such time as improvements are completed and accepted by the City to City Standards. b. To remove the direct access parking lot located near the southeast corner of said Lot 18 which street is improved. c. To pay an equitable sha of, not only the improWent of the street, but all co1gg arising out of the modification of the intersection of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street to provide for adequate sight distance and any other changes deemed necessary by the City for the protection of the public safety. d. To comply with the above covenants and conditions no later than when the other portion of the subject South 153rd Street is required to be developed in accordance with the terms and.conditions of the Property Use and Development Agreement dated February 5, 1968, between the City and Mrs. R. M. Wingate, recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 6318166 and attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein . as though fully set forth. This agreement is effective only if building permit is received within 30 days from below date for present application on land north of existing buildings. . 2. This Agreement shall be recorded in the records of King County Auditor and the covenants herein shall be deemed to attach to and run with the land and shall be binding upon the Covenantor, his successors and assigns. 3. The City may institute and prosecute any proceedings at law or equity to enforce this Agreement, and Owner agrees to pay reasonable attorney's fees expended by the City for such enforcement proceedings. 4. It is further expressly agreed that in the event any covenant, condition or restriction hereinabove con - tained or any partition thereof is invalid or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any other . covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained. SIGNED THIS DAY OF , 1977. CITY OF TUKWILA OWNER By: Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor i liam P. Petcham, a single man ATTEST: ATTEST: By: Maxine Anderson, City Clerk By' Nanc ATTEST: Ar Bv: RITTFNHOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCI AT ES GEOLOGY & SOILS ENGINEERING 13240 NOftlir up Way, Bellevue, WasIlingt on <J3005 (705) 746-8020' 8050 S.W. (Tin us Drive, Bcaverton, Oregon 97005 (509) 644-9141 N. Construction c/o F. E. Hammons 2709 Airport Way S. Seattle, Washington 98134 • - Referring: Gentlemen: June 16, 1977 W--2489 Grading Recommendations Proposed Apartment .Complex on Lot 18, Interurban Addition Tukwira, Vja sh ing ton In accordance with the request of Jack Eller, Engineer, we have visually inspected the above site where a 2 and a 3 story apartment structures are planned. Based on this examination, the following recommendations are presented: 1. Two Story Structure; A. The proposed .2 story structure at the west end .of the conex is now designed to be cut into tbe•lower portion of an existing The soils in this area appear to be natural and firm; however, during construction it should be verified that no fill was spread into the building area during, development of the structures to the south. • 1( &. J( Construction Page Two June 16, 1977 13. Assuming that the foundations are in firm natural ground, we recommend using a.n allowable bearing pressure of 2, 500 psf. If fill..is encountered, footings should, extend through the fill. into natural ground or the fill should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill (90% of A.S'1'M :D- l557). C. The parking area in the depression between the structures is to be loca.ted•on fill. The northeast corner of the fill will. extend into a low, wet area containing some organic matter. Prior to filling, all topsoil, peat and organic soil should first be stripped. If the stripped ground is wet, it may be necessary to begin the fill with gravel, quarry spalls, etc. Generally, the fill should be placed in 8 inch lifts and compacted to .90% of AST-1557. 11. some settlement can be tolerated, a lesser degree of compaction can be utilized; however, for stability puurposes, the outer (north edge) portion of the fi].1 should be compacted to the 90% minimum. A. 21I:1V slope angle is recommended for compacted fill. slopes. D. Some seepage was noted at the toe of the slope. Whenever springs or wet ground i.s noted, it should be dried with drains. Similarly, it is essential that the retaining walls be backfilied with "clean" (i. e. , less than 5% fines) sand and gravel or gravel. A perimeter footing drain should be provided.to prevent any •onding of water behind the wail. 1:i the ground behind the wall is sloping, this surcharge should be taken into account when the wall i.s designed. 2. 'Three Story Structure: A. The majority of this structure will be located in natural ground. Here again, we suggest the use of a 2, 500 psf allowable bearing K Construction Page Three June 16, 1977 pressure on firm natural. ground or properly compacted fill. 13. At the northwest corner of the structure, the building will be located on compacted fill. All topsoil and organic soils should first be stripped. If the stripped ground is wet, the fill. ma.y have to be started with quarry spalls or gravel. The fill should then be placed in 8 inch. lifts and compacted to 90% of AST1V: . 1.D- 1.557. C. At the east end of the structure a parking lot is planned. It appears this area presently contains some uncompacted fill. This will be suitable for parking but some long term settlement and warping should be expected. D. A rockery is planned along the property line below the existing residence. .hl.though the work schedule should be left to the contractor, we suggest the rockery be constructed in stages to minimize the possibility of undermining the residence. The rockery should be properly constructed with a quarry spall backfili to allow for drainage. 3 General A. Some areas of existing fills appear to be present, such as in the vicinity of the 12 inch concrete drain pipes. 'Phis should be suitable for parking but some long term s ettlement is possible. le. 13. The site soils can be used in compacted fills when they are at or slightly below their "optimum moisture content". However, when K & N Construction (Tune 16, 1977 Page Four wet, these soils will be difficult or impossible to properly compact, Thus, it is essential tnK tt grading be pm-I'm-riled during dry Weather. Should you have any additional questions during the design phase • or require inspections during. the construction phase, please do not hesitate to call. i ~l;. �- c Y .\ ,ASS /- • zz�Fr J Respectfully submitted RITTENI-IOUSE- ZEMA.N & ASSOC., INC. Alvin l.t Leman, . E CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIR•ENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVI•FORM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: oval,/ Fi U vt Ju a n► aQ,d rf iah 6. I J3 r4 arwq 02144 AVV. . DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: i(o \JtMA.ei 1411 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: BriPi'fe: 7— `- - 7 7 by: 4, �A AMP ❑ Planning: 9— C.1/ by: I..�'r ❑ Police: by: (reviewer) 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: p- ov/ l e [4' e Pr071 ec 74./.0•7 )b,dL 47 4/1 te- H9 d i' T i oq p U /3 c /14aA6-0-%1•0 -p -er a /.7t.7 #72-47 i "7300 of /9'7 a vF� ; decide, 14 0--e- (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by Date Date by Staff Person Letter, Phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. 7- TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OFFICE MEMO CITY OF TU KW I LA • hin e 1„,).0 (sC7U , ?)rits-4 16 August 1977 CITY of 'f UKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Dick Hammon 2709 Airport Way South Seattle, Washington 98134 Dear Mr. Hammon: Thank you for your cooperation and personal attention on the San. Juan Apart- ment building permit. I apologize for it taking so long. With your property being on the edge of a single - family zone, there has been additional atten- tion given to it for transitional purposes. At this point all the negative impacts identified through the State Environ- mental Policy Act have been satisfied except the signing of the developers agreement on the street. Four copies of this document are enclosed. As soon as these are signed by all parties, we can issue a building permit. Please have someone attest each of the Ketchum's signatures. Also enclosed is a withdrawal of the affirmative declaration to officially delete the requirement of a full environmental impact statement. Sincerely, ell Stoknes 01C.D. Director KS /ch cc: Mayor Council President Fred Satterstrom Al Pieper Enclosures 6230 Southcenter Boulevard v Tukwila, Washington 98188 IN (206) 242 -2177. CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED /. -€N,4L DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE /' • Description of proposal SanJuan Apartment Addition Proponent Henry and William Ketcham Location of Proposal South 153rd Street north of SanJuan Apts. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD-24 9 y \ __. This proposal has been determined to (have /Re+—htvr) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment.. An EIS (is /ipe—fte4) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2). (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title O.C.D. Director Date 28 July 1977 COMMENTS: See attached sheet for potential measures which could be taken to mitigate the environmental impacts. *Note: If action on mitigating factors is not substantially completed by August 12, 1977, this proposed declaration shall become final. Mailed to applicant: 28 July 1977 • • 27 July 1977 SanJuan Apartment Addition South 153rd Street North of SanJuan Apartments 1. Developers agreement to be executed, filed, and to include no parking tiY on South 153rd Street. This agreement also is to provide a public access easement over the area designated for future dedication. 2. Grading plan to be submitted showing how bank adjacent and north of single - family home is to be stabilized. 3. Exterior building materials to be stated. 4. A total landscape plan is to be submitted tothe City for approval, including site screening to the north. 5. Placement of garbage containers and proposed screening to be shown on landscape plan. 6. No parking - fire lane is to be posted on all internal driveways and roads, including South 153rd Street. 7. Easement through SanJuan complex to new complex to be provided or legal to be revised to include SanJuan Apartment Complex. 8. Screen parking area in northeast corner by an evergreen hedge per TMC 18.56.070 (2) and show in landscape plan. 9. Parking area to be revised to eliminate two parking spaces on driveway turn at southeast corner of lot. 10. off a-re to b,e_provided aid —the os- tamat.e.dltnoff afte.r devea -opme tt for—a 2- 5-4a-r — .s- term- =--- M €a.s•u-res to limit d Ltf -Tew o =pre sent- co ndiii -ens under a lart-pfd AA-611444.w. • \� 47-60-49 17g9,2-9) b y d' i 1v a \A" — • a,?) ' 1rinA.A.72449 a oc),?,07-arv -?-77r) 0), v12-? 4 1 1_,Ad 11.%--c)77 ,c)57 12-Lo p, 4 ]/V,p,40 vtA'r71---- S-ej (P laaA/LL 61� (A:a ) aop• 70 a7 /-(A/622- 7- n- w,i0,:iy �eS�� .), 1 s-/-64-- C-y,47-e- S am, ki 7 671 (1/4 0,,,,/,-(75 ce 5.4 ' ~ / Henry H. 6, William P. Ketcham 1661 E. Olive Way Seattle, Wa. 98112 July 5,1977 Fred N. Satterstroa Planning Supervisor City og Tukwila Dear dr. Satterstros: In response to your letter of June 24,1977 I will attempt to answer your questions to the best of my ability. Al you know many of your questions are philosophical and my answers can only reflect my opinion. 1. Land Use. I feel the proposed project will have very little affect on the future land use in the vicinity because the site is isolated and is really -the second..phase of the original plan which was to complete the project in .two stages. The comprehensive plan allows lower density and may or may not be the best approach. Who knows - only time will tell. The cost of single family housing has risen beyond many peoples income. They are forced to find an apartment. The current and impending energy crisis will force many people to live closer to their work. So where do we put the multi- family housing? No current or comprehensive plan can be perfect or please everyone. 1 feel that Tukwila is fortunate to have an interesting terrain which allows single and multi - family housing ts.blend together harmoniously. The land use trends are for lower density, largely duplex,triplex and fourplexes. ,. 2. The swamp will be cleared and transformed into a pond. No more water will be added to the swamp. All surface water from driveways and parking areas will 7" � be collected in catch basins and piped_ directly to thetwo12inch _ pipes,which drain the swamp. There will probably be less water when our plans are completea. The perimeter will be sloped and landscaped. The south end, however, may require some retaining rock as well as plantings. If future developers to the north do as good a job of clearing as we will, I think we will end up with a small stream instead of a swamp. Anything that we do will be of benefit as it will definitely allow present stagnent water to flow more freely. 3. The 26 unit structure is a beautifully designed building and will set lower than the present exsisting buildings. Because of the hill on the west, higher terrain to the north and to the south east, plus the low pitched roof, the Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila July 5,1977 page -2. building will not have a high profile. I do not think it will have any affect on future trends of building sizes because it is located back in a so- called isolated pocket that will have very limited exposure. Please telephone me at 325 -0200 if additional information is required. Sincerely, Henry H tcham, Jr. 24 June 1977 CITY of TUKW LA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Henry H. and W. P. Ketcham 1661 East Olive Way Seattle, Washington 98112 RE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: GRADE /FILL PERMIT /SAN JUAN ADDITION Dear Sirs: The Planning Division has completed its initial review of the environmental questionnaire submitted in conjunction with the abovementioned project. Generally, the questionnaire provided satisfactory information with regards to most of the points. However, a few points were either not touched upon or not explained in enough detail to render a threshold determination. Therefore, this office would request that you submit additional information with respect to the following items: 1. Land Use - How will the proposed use of the site impact the future land use in the vicinity? How does the pro- posed use relate to the emerging comprehensive plan? What are the land use trends in the vicinity of the site? 2. Drainage - How will the swamp be affected by the project? Will more or less water be added to the swamp? Is it to be retained? How will the perimeter of the swamp be treated? Will future development on other surrounding sites have any impact on the swamp? 3. Aesthetics - Although probably related more to land use, what will the visual effect of the bulk of the 26 -unit structure have as far as "trending" toward additional bulky structures in the vicinity? Also, what will the structures look like? Do you have any perspective or elevation drawings? This additional information is being requested pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -330 of the State Environmental Policy Act. This infor- 6230 Southcenter Boulevard to Tukwila, Washington 98188 19 (206) 242 -2177 it • • Henry H. and W. P. Ketcham Page 2 24 June 1977 mation is needed before the Responsible Official can reach a "threshold determination" (i.e., whether or not an EIS is required). Also, please be advised that according to City of Tukwila Ordi- nance #986, your site lies within a general area defined as "environmentally sensitive" and, consequently, requires a waiver from Resolution #489. This waiver may be applied for once the environmental review on the grade /fill permit is complete. I'm sure you have some questions concerning the contents of this letter and I urge you to contact me at your convenience at 242 -2177. red N. Satterstlom Planning Supervisor FNS /cw cc: OCD Director CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRC NTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEllkORM PROJECT NAME: OradA. /ri u 176n/ wit — Javi. J0444 AA-441-17.014 PROJECT ADDRESS: &. 133•It Am-a. is2. "4- /sore, J• • DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 10 J UAAV 14/1 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: 03/Engineering: Z3 Z---010E fl by: ❑ Fire: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: CO '-s i/ePOIZT f2E C CO Ste- TO ui'N tI.LSPEt o. OK) Scsrt lij eu 3oiuotNCBS qpputo arA"'"‘ • (TO BE COMPLETED. BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, Phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. CITY OF TUKWILA ENV I RCINTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV I E.ORM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: 001412-/191A Perwt i t — Awl J u ctM, Mai-14 DM b . 1153 Plit M. A4. 117, Y.el Ave'. J' . DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 1(e 'JUM.L t477 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) by: C.c,/ ❑ Engineering: / by: Q Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: . j ) J 4u I .6 cr 3 ,Qi'- ,, -iii A- 4,4-,a, it i. = --� P - n / o ; 0 r3 C , jl-<- , -r ;15/ a. JGC.vr ,e,;-,. (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official •Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, Phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Henry HQ Jr., and 141.Y, Ketch 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Phone: 325 -0200 1661 E. Olive Way, Seattle, Wn. 98112. (P.O. Box 12067) 3. Date Checklist Submitted: June p/ , 1977 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: TIVLG'IIV } 0010 axritt 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: C 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 30 unit apt. complex in two buildings (one two story,. Que_xhree Rtory) units composed of 11 one b.r. and 19 two b.r. units. 45 parkislg_ spaces on site 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Proposed project would be l,o court type apt. complex (see _Eite pi.aji), Both prpperty parrpls under one ownership. trees are on three s.des pf property, 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 9 -30 -77 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES X NO • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: Grading and Fill YES X NO YES x NO YES x NO • YES x NO YES x NO YES NO x YES x NO YES x NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: 0 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO x (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? x (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? x (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- x (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: b: See enclosed engineers drawings 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: Possibly, from the addition of 30 to 45 vehicles in the area YES MAYBE NO 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? x x x x (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X — (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X — (f) (g) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- x x • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? �x (i). Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? x Explanation: B..D..E e: Catch basin water from road and parking areas will be either run into the swamp or existing out flow lines from the swamp 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? x x (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x Explanation: C: Use of landscaping plants including Rhodendrons, Azaleas, Viburnum Duvadil, Junipers Acer Palm Atum, Thula Pyrmadalis and Laural 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or . endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? t' x x x Explanation:The approximate 20 acres of natural conifer and maples brush. B: .Property before clearin immediately to the north, ample habitate to wildlife g was covered with 101 high blackberries and -4- YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x Explanation: amgient noise levels should increase temporarily during certain stages of the construction period, this condition will not be.permenant 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural. resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: x x • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The growth rate will be increased by the number of people inhabiting the 30 apt. units 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x Explanation: Will increase the available apartments in the area by 30 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x x Explanation: a: By the addition of 30 -45 vehicles in the area b: Adequate parking will be provided on the site c: 62nd and 65th S. and S. 153rd will be used f: Only the extent of the use of 30 to 45 cars in the area 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x x x x x YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? - x Explanation: A: Hopefully we may never need the existing fire protection, but we might, present system is adequate b: Same as above d: Parks and recreation facilities may be used, existing facilities are adequate 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: Only electric energy to service 30 units 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Adequate power, telephone, water and sewer have been run to the site 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of fu is osure on my part. Aoet„..ty) 6/7 Signature and Title Da e 'x x • RITTENHOUSE -ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOLOGY & SOILS ENGINEERING 13240 Northrup Way, Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 746 -8020 8050 S.W. Cirrus Drive, Beaverton, Oregon 97005 (509) 644 -9141 K & K Construction c/o F. E. Hammons 2709 Airport Way S. Seattle, Washington 98134 Referring: Gentlemen: June 16, 1977 W -2489 Grading Recommendations Proposed Apartment Complex on Lot 18, Interurban Addition Tukwila, Washington In accordance with the request of Mr. Jack Eller, Engineer, we have visually inspected the above site where a 2 and a 3 story apartment structures are planned. Based on this examination, the following recommendations are presented: I. Two Story Structure: • A. The proposed 2 story structure at the west end of the complex is now designed to be cut into the lower portion of an existing hillside. The soils in this area appear to be natural and firm; however, during construction it should be verified that no fill was spread into the building area during development of the structures to the south. K & K Construction Page Two June 16, 1977 B. Assuming that the foundations are in firm natural ground, we recommend using an allowable bearing pressure of 2, 500 psf. If fill is encountered, footings should extend through the fill into natural ground or the fill should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill (90% of ASTM:D - 1557). C. The parking area in the depression between the structures is to be located on fill. The northeast corner of the fill will extend into a low, wet area containing some organic matter. Prior to filling, all topsoil, peat and organic soil should first be stripped. If the stripped ground is wet, it may be necessary to begin the fill with gravel, quarry spalls, etc. Generally, the fill should be placed in 8 inch lifts and compacted to 90% of ASTM :D -1557. If some settlement can be tolerated, a lesser degree of compaction can be utilized; however, for stability puurposes, the outer (north edge) portion of the fill should be compacted to the 90% minimum. A 2H:1V slope angle is recommended for compacted fill slopes. D. Some seepage was noted at the toe of the slope. Whenever springs or wet ground is noted, it should be dried with drains. Similarly, it is essential that the retaining walls be backfilled with "clean" (i. e. , less than 5% fines) sand and gravel or gravel. A perimeter footing drain should be provided to prevent any ponding of water behind the wall. If the ground behind the wall is sloping, this surcharge should be taken into account when the wall is designed. 2. Three Story Structure: A. The majority of this structure will be located in natural ground. Here again, we suggest the use of a 2, 500 psf allowable bearing K & K Construction June 16, 1977 Page Three pressure on firm natural ground or properly compacted fill. B. At the northwest corner of the structure, the building will be located on compacted fill. All topsoil and organic soils should first be stripped. If the stripped ground is wet, the fill may have to be started with quarry spalls or gravel. The fill should then be placed in 8 inch lifts and compacted to 90% of ASTM: D -1557. C. At the east end of the structure a parking lot is planned. It appears this area presently contains some uncompacted fill. This will be suitable for parking but some long term settlement and warping should be expected. D. A rockery is planned along the property line below the existing residence. Although the work schedule should be left to the contractor, we suggest the rockery be constructed in stages to minimize the possibility of undermining the residence. The rockery should be properly constructed with a quarry spall backfill to allow for drainage. 3. General Some areas of existing fills appear to be present, such as in the vicinity of the 12 inch concrete drain pipes. This should be suitable for parking but some long term settlement is possible. B. The site soils can be used in compacted fills when they are at or slightly below their "optimum moisture content ". However, when v. a rt • • K & K Construction Page Four June 16, 1977 wet, these soils will be difficult or impossible to properly compact. Thus, it is essential that grading be performed during dry weather. Should you have any additional questions during the design phase or require inspections during the construction phase, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted RITTENHOUSE -ZEMAN & ASSOC., INC. Alvin R Zeman, P.E. L. /7 RANGE 4 EAST RANGE O EAST CITY OF TUKWILA ZONING Jf ife of Kthctuw► (mitt,/ Fi Pavv.; 1- LEGEND R•A RESIDENTIAL- AGRICULTURAL R.1.7.2 1 FAMILY RESIDENCE R•1.9.6 1 FAMILY RESIDENCE R•1.12.0 1 FAMILY RESIDENCE R.2.8.4 2 FAMILY RESIDENCE R.3 3 FAMILY RESIDENCE R•3.60 3or4 FAMILY RESIDENCE R-4 LOW APARTMENTS RMH MULT. RESIDENCE HIGH DENS. PF PUBLIC FACILITY C•1 NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL C•2 LOCAL RETAIL CPR PLAN'D BUS. CENTER REGIONAL CM INDUSTRIAL PARK M•1 LIGHT INDUSTRY M•2 HEAVY INDUSTRY M -21 J 500 1000 1500 3770 3000 53. ITY i F:TU WILA PLANNING DE'ARTM NT MAY 1975 TUKWILA WASHINGTON•REVISIONSI RECEIPT D Received From /Je Address_._P�v ate_ 9_77_ r; 133 For ACC RUNT !AT. OF ACCOUNT How PAID CASH -i AMT. FAIR CHECK C:ILANCI —� 10 :FY By \ , I DUE ORDER OKeoa I ' ■ 1 li I • • I, \ \I 1 ( ‘ ) 1 1 \ \ ) • • / • , f• / ( / • tsi ; • \ , ,; • N 185 5 /1 \\ \ \ j \ \ 7'1\ /50-- 1705 / 153R0 11 Died 25 270 PKWY. x x 24.5 26.5 SOUTHCENTER x 26.021 X 74. Paved Parking 265 26.5 ILW.'Ce gre' - •• LoT 181 ' • IUTEQL¢DA1.I ADO, e 3 IGO 150 140. s -,4u- /k 1488'25.27 "w 1 /' 54.2. 44 I:D4E OF Exis -r, .IGQSPN4er Couc. PPe CA. Eie+. luv- 134.00 PL i "a 30' Z. uurr dP r. VLJI,� 1 u.:Ganve •Idld+ l PROFILE A —A 0 ESTIMATED EXGANAT ION .QvANT 1T `f a 1,800 c.•-(. P2OPOSat) GR.01I4G PlrAt�l Co14sTiZVGT (Q1 -1 Job Pte.