Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-31 - EHMKE HORST - 4-PLEX COMPLEXHORST EHMKE 4 -PLEX 62NDAVES&S 153ST EPIC -FD -31 CITY of TUKW LA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3 August 1977 Mr. Bruce Mecklenburg P.O. Box 822 Seahurst, Washington 98062 RE: Ehmke 4 -plex development Dear Mr. Mecklenburg: As we discussed in our telephone conversation on August 2, 1977, I will make a negative declaration on the environmental impacts of the above referenced project when items 1, 3, and 4 of the attached sheet are satisfactorily completed. Please contact Mr. Dick Williams of the Public Works Department for the format to use on items 3 and 4. Items 2 and 5 are dropped. Item 2 was dropped on the recommendation of George Wannamaker of King County Hydrolics and item 5 was dropped since there is presently compliance with it. Please complete these items as soon as possible. Sincerely, 1 Stoknes Responsible Official KS /cw. cc: Al Pieper Gary Crutchfield Dick Williams \PIC File (Horst Ehmke) Attachment NOTE: Please contact Dick Williams regarding your requirements for getting the storm water satisfactorily into the City's system on Southcenter Boulevard without causing property damage to the adjacent property owner to the south. 6230 Southcenter Boulevard m Tukwila, Washington 98188 m (206) 242 -2177 CITY OF TU:KWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED Vi=i «,1L DECLARATION OF S I Gi'I I F I CANOE/ i 4NCE • Description of proposal Four -plex Complex Proponent Horst Ehmke Location of Proposal 62nd Avenue and South 153rd Street Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-FD- This proposal has been determined to (have /rr t ftaV) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is/ -.rte.) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Kjell Stoknes O.C.D. Director COMMENTS:. See attached sheet for potential measures which could be taken to mitigate the environmental impacts. *Note: If action on mitigating factors is not substantially completed by August 12, 1977, this proposed declaration shall become final. Mailed to applicant: 28 July 1977 4FI28 July 1977 EHMKE FOUR -FLEX DEVELOPMENT Vicinity of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street 1. Submission and approval of landscape plan, including screening of parking. Also, show garbage recepticle locations and screening. 2. En-fnccri ng cal ctrl toragc i oscd method for pr-o-v-i- di- eg-the enrJ- z,- cr-- c-rvrr . Vrill 2-y 444,11-6 wfi,.. (tee -o-``f (Net----Awekti 13 11 V.A6,,z4 3. Dedicate easterly five feet of land to City for right -of -way. 00 4. Enter into an agreement with the City of Tukwila agreeing to partici -. pate in a future local improvement district to make necessary public 101e;. improvements to 62nd Avenue South when and as deemed necessary by the City of Tukwila. 5. Pa rk i n g-- s- p- aces- pl-a-s- afPer park- -n3—st 41 -1 ;TMC-- 18T5L100) . Recommend i ncre 1 parking ` rrirSk 1u44k- 2.,1/1-7 Pve-rier is 014-r 3 5 a tv ��';� CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED /+ DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ • 0 • h iV Description of proposal Four -plex Complex Proponent Horst Ehmke Location of Proposal 62nd Avenue and South 153rd Street Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -25 This proposal has been determined to (have /rrv) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /4e4) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title O.C.D. Director Date 28 July 1977 Signature COMMENTS: See attached sheet for potential measures which could be taken to mitigate the environmental impacts. *Note: If action on mitigating factors is not substantially completed by August 12, 1977, this proposed declaration shall become final. Mailed to applicant: 28 July 1977 28 July 1977 IP. EHMKE FOUR -PLEX DEVELOPMENT Vicinity of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street 1. Submission and approval of landscape plan, including screening of parking. Also, show garbage recepticle locations and screening. 2. Vrervi""' 14L 1-0-4- �4l"M ?"--r Ge4,14 ipa Aw / $1111 �r 3. Dedicate easterly five feet of land to City for right -of -way. T,i 4. Enter into an agreement with the City of Tukwila agreeing to partici- pate in a future local improvement district to make necessary public W: improvements to 62nd Avenue South when and as deemed necessary by the City of Tukwila. 5. .111,•1. Wgu 2-41 tm� At- myer 3 5 s � �-� E - Ix x V --t./Er-e,Orn &------/(J 1. 5 /..;14eite,k,iit‘i 6.'ee,,,e ei°,6g-}4;-7 kitblit /Ai/b.& r_ i,ecgt: 4 c ,„_ ,/m,, e,-/-ee,-,9. , fa/7: - 1 y,iv 60-4 } _4 2.s ;v1A/174 ,4/eJ fin), -1-c›r Trviltt:-/vi gL,e-1- A,) c-/ etir4-611 . PeAtettsb ,e,a4A-6-/ iliA- )—e p_ yi/„, -to 6-.41 1/07- Kibil---t-oay. -- Cryt=ge-if ;,tr-- A4-4_ 1 7-4e/lija Tee-441 --A / AI - _ c I __ . ,---y1441.1 ,e,..„ A iste74-64Je2-7 p-eyYte-rxe 6pviv-e, whe44 a/nd itr,tNa -11.A‘e ‘c-M Tibvec er) if • be a, 1;1 t ; bte1/4 rppp 5...e 4. pc41)R 4 - iy2i're( 9 (-7114/ /oO) f2i' A IF 60 Pi Z dit a44/4419 /j1R-1/1 7C-0I-v? /-1/eA PARKS RECREAT ION COTY of TUKWOLA OFFICE 25 April 1977 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Bruce W. Mecklenburg Architect P.O. Box 822 Seahurst, Washington 98062 • RE: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR HORST EMKE PROJECT Dear Mr. Mecklenburg: With regard to the abovementioned project, a $50.00 fee is required with the environmental checklist in order for the application to be considered complete. This fee must be paid before any permits can be issued. If you have any questions, please contact me. cerely, red N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor FNS/cw cc: Al Pieper, Building Official 6230 Southc.ont7,:r u 7:r? f7L.i (20'6) 242-2177 Dollars $ CK600 Radirp e7) ACCOUNT AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PAID BALANCE • DUE HOW PAID CHECK MONEY ORDER CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Owner -Bu i I der Hnrst Fhmke r f n Rruc a W. MAC I enburg, Architect 242. 3735 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: P.O. Box 822, Seahurst, Wash. 98062, Phone 242 -3734 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Val ley High 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an ac- curate understanding of its scope and nature): See Site Plan and Vicinity Map 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, in- cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal!): ,Seth jA("+ propvr+y i c I ooAtod wAS+ of And Ad j Ar -ran+ +n 67nd AVE. S approx. 300' north of Southcenter Blvd. Property slopes to south 10 to 15%. The property contains 113,698 sq. ft. See Site Plan and Vicinity Map 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: September 1977 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b) King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO X YES NO X YES X NO. (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: Telephone, cable T.V., Puget Power YES NO X YES X NO YES NO YES X NO YES NO YES NO YES X NO YES X NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: N.A. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? Balance cut & f i l l and provide X topsoil where required i (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? Only as necessary to site buildings ? � and parking. See Site Plan. (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: (o) 0vo qrJil4q p (Vt s . - 1 [z (p 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: . (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Only related to parking required for automobiles (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO changes - bare land to apartment use 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? - X Where ground covered with pavement, roofs and walks. Remainder land (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?scaped. X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Only as related to parking (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduced absorbtion due to paved area and. roof. -3- X (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • X ,fit {j 0 42r(nk w 5 41'1A 4 141142! nOtti:tra yam Gain am ge 4, �i 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: q m,0,_ I- Jae (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? Variety may be increased . as provided in planting & landscaped .(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or areas. endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? See (a) above X (d). Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: Existing - primarily covered with grass and blackberries, minimal amount of low natives, and one or two friut trees. Additional landscaping will be included in the project. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Do not believe effect will be signigicant. (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: _X_. YES MAYBE N0 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? As related to apartment use X Explanation: Auto circulation as required for apartments per zoning ordinance 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: Only normal apartment related sources Minimal glare from area lighting. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Present use less dense than future planned use. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: Electrical power 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: Only as related to passenger automobiles X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: Land now vacant to be apartment use. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation; YES MAYBE NO 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? T (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? T Explanation: Additional movement and parking as related to and required for,apartments. G .c� fr{ midi -"� 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: As related to apartment density use. Will also generate additional income for such services. YES MAYBE NO X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X _ Explanation: As related to apartment density use 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Extention of sewer main form Southcenter Blvd See Utilities Plan rt&K -4/f • d al co c vc Sle cer. q . 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X Explanation: None known X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: N o Scar tyied pplc i iJ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or histor- ical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: tp, lief" X. CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above infor- mation is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. vt, re .S , c›\N/►jEi2 E5 i l::D tE Project Name: Project Address:5cout•N\VESt tWrialmsectioLl 5o. 153R0 <02►417 So . Signatu e and Title ,&r24 itE.G4 -__ - 30_ - ?7= Date BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS: Check one 1. Date of Review: Building . 1- /f1/ 7; by: �. ( +) or (t Planning by: ( +) or ( -) Engineering by: ( +) or ( -) Police by: ( +) or ( -) Fire by: ( +) or ( -) 2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is,exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official. Date 3. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 759. ( +) ( -) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be done. Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not be done.