The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-34 - INTERNATIONAL SALES - 20,000 SF WAREHOUSE / 4,000 SF OFFICESINTERNATIONAL SALES EPIGFD -W CITY OF TUKWILA. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT p- R6i'fr3tD /FINAL DECLARATION OF sS-I /i'JON —S I Gib I F I CANCE Description of proposal 20,000 sq ft warehouse and 4,000 sq ft offices Proponent International Sales Location of Proposal N.E. Junction of Interurban & 143rd Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -34 This proposal has been determined to (-a- / of have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (41/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development Date October 11, 1977 Signature COMMENTS: The following conditions are placed upon this property: 1. Large hardy shade trees at a maximum of 30 fget on center such as sycamore, maple, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, alder, popler, cottonwood, birch or black locust are to be placed along the river. (Shoreline Program, p. 6.3, item 3 a) To be completed by time of occupancy. 2. All perimeters of land fills shall be provided with erosion control. (Shoreline program, page 6.2, item 10) To be completed by time of occupancy. 3. All waste handling of toxic materials is to be reviewed and approved by METRO prior to issuance of a building permit to guarantee that no toxic materials will reach the river. COMMENT: Although not a requirement, the City of Tukwila at some future date would like to develop a pedestrian trail along the river. This is offered as information only. TO: FROM: Fred Sa terstrom SUBJECT: • MEMORANDUM • CITY can • T-�� OFFICE of COMMUNITY C =_V LDPM =NT 7 October 1977 Kjell Stoly s, Responsible Official Environmental Checklist: International Sales Shoreline Permit The following is a brief chronology of the progress of the environmental review for the proposed International Sales warehouse on South 143rd Street: 1. Application, for a Shoreline Permit was made by International Sales on 18 August 1977. An environmental checklist was submitted therewith. 2. Environmental checklist was reviewed by the Engineering Department (23 August 1977), Building Department (24 August 1977), and the Fire Department (24 August 1977). 3. Based on the review of the questionnaire by the Planning Division and that of other City departments, a request for additional information was made on 31 August 1977. . 4. Additional information was submitted by the applicant in part on 23 September 1977 and again on 26 September 1977.. 5. Review of the additional information was completed on 30 September when the Fire Department completed their examination of the list of explosive and toxic substances proposed to be used or stored on the site. Based on the . threshold determination criteria specified in MAC 197- 10- 360,-I offer the following report on the proposed action: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed project entails the construction of 20,000 square feet of ware- house space and 4,000 square feet of office space with associated parking area on a 4.5 acre site at the intersection of Maule Avenue and South 143rd Street. . 2. The site is currently undeveloped and is characterized by, brush on the southern two - thirds of the site and tall cottonwood trees on the northernmost one -third near the edge of the Green River. 3. Approximately 5,600 cubic yards of fill will be imported for the building and parking sites. Kjell Stoknes Page 2 Memorandum 7 October 1977 4. All lands designated for building and parking area will be cleared of vege- tation. Vegetation lying within 200' of the river will be left in its natural condition except for that area where the storm drain will be .located. 5. The following list of materials will either be handled or stored on the site: Class IA - 1,100 gals. Class IC - 400 gals. Class II - 1,000 gals. Class III - 1,000 gals. Class III - 4,000 gals. (paints and thinners) (paint) (paint) (paint) (polyester resin) outside storage 6. The ordinary high water mark at 9000 c.f.s. occurs at 15.7 feet. 7. Distribution of goods from the warehouse facility will occur by truck. 15 truck trips are anticipated daily by the applicant. Staff feels a more realistic figure may be 25. Parking space required by code is approximately 33 stalls. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Although the proposed action represents a change in land use from undeveloped to warehouse activity, the change is occurring on the least sensitive part of the site, i.e., that portion of the site located over 200 feet from the river. 2. The most sensitive area on the site is that area located along the river. Except for the proposed storm drain pipe, this area will remain in its natural state. 3. No significant adverse impact appears likely to the natural environment as a result of this project. . 4. No significant adverse impact to the human environment appear likely as a result of this project. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above Findings and Conclusions, the Planning Division recommends that an EIS not be done. It should be noted on the negative declaration, how- ever, that this environmental review pertains only to the proposed development . and not to any expansion on the lot. FNS /ch • MEMORANDUM C D \ of TUKW to OFFICE of COMMUNITY CEVELQPfJENT 27 September 1977 TO: Jim Hoel , 're Marshal FROM: Fred S erstrom, Planning Supervisor SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE: INTERNATIONAL SALES Pursuant to your comments on the above matter, the Planning Division requested additional information from the applicant concerning flam- mable, potentially explosive, and toxic materials, in addition to some other related points. I direct your attention to p. 2 of the letter dated 23 September 1977. Here there is a list of materials to be stored and /or handled which may be considered as a risk factor. Please review and if you have any comments forward them to me as soon as possible. .FS /ch Attachments 94j Er Re q10 b 076/C /— f / Efr / S 5 )-et e `% / �5/ cve d e �010 4 8 i ��(,/% J os i �/ -2 S i jh h, (1s7-- RE�I i ED BY SEP .2.8 l977,...,..1.11. TUKWILA FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU FIRE DEPPARTMENT CITY of TUKWILA 444 ANDOVER PARK EAST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 TELEPHONE: (206) 244 -7221 City of Tukwila Planning Dept. Aug. 24, 1977 Re: International Sales proposed facility. The explanation of the Risk of Upset (Item #10) does not appear to be entirely accurate. In my conversations with representatives from International Sales, I am under the opinion that their entire operation deals with flammable, reactive and possibly explosive material (Methyl- Ethyl Ketone Peroxide). In view of the close proximity to dense population (residences and the Riverside Inn), I suggest that a more detailed, definitive description of the entire operation and building contents be submitted for review before any approval is considered. cc: TFD file. Fire Chief. Sincerely: James Hoel, Fire Marshal. geVelK51-1 . ux,r -RR I I--ARY htql Vici F-12- - LI LIE —A:X*1174. 7 -- 1 rig,r-Ai- 1-10fe curuAL-f 1-10-1 w12. f4 A2t • 15.1, 21o... 10 FSL -Cour.X.0 LIUC'elr...K1411-1aP S. ■14-uk1 a AP. GC::0str:`3 Cit.:42!:-ILe. PP3141...ATILL.1 -1.112543s1 U _ 0,3 cr ffr.;tVipt.v. ITZEZ-1-117/A5617-tY . 7rgelroin4 tfeqe--1 \WV- --- MOP LtUe' mar. 01-ev ,111 isr.c.pe c.kp or_rtipp.Aur )43 R.° of • e(-{Ar1--.1-1:2 • INTERNATION.A1, • WAREHOUSE. Sif:,,LV OFFICE PROPOSti rntS fri 1 tallArmi ( -r. (1 :41 ;1■-: I .1 !.!. • • • RIP RAP OR SPALLS F.C.-21:67-1H RIVER BOTTOM • ti NATURAL GROUND I M 1. MIN. TOP OF SLOPE WIDTH t - O TOE WIDTH 4'`0~ :.MIN. THICKNESS AT TOE OF SLOPE '. MAX.TOE ELEV. IFT. BELOW RIVER BOTTOM 11 ; • Z. -0 I N N.THICKNESS OF TOE 3 -0 LAME OF PROJECT '1VER "e-" • _ OCATION ATE - TITLE: �(P RAP WITHOUT LEVEE • 13!4 SPECIFICATION : ROCK RIP RAP 4o -Sol• s ..% \s- sow 'LS -3S% 5b -10o4. 1S- 359o... . 1e01t-ISC OFFSET FRAME GRATE SO THAT RESTRICTOR /POLLUTION DEVICE IS VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER THE LADDER- / STD. GA LV . CB LADDER STEPS GRATE ELEVATION CHAIN - 200# CAPACITY SLACK WHEN GATE IS DOWN WELD CHAIN TO CB FRAME WATERTIGHT CLEAN - OUT GATE WITH MIN. 8" GAUGE SLIDE INLET PIPE MIN. SLOPE .5% OVERFLOW ELEVATION - SET TO PROVIDE REQUIRED DETENTION AND ADEQUATE OIL SEPARATION PRO - TECTION • OVERFLOW PIPE & OUTLET PIPE MUST HAVE CAPACITY EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN COMBINED SLOPE INLET SYSTEM -� OUTLET PIPE MINIMUM MINIMUM INVERT ELEVATION -" RESTRICTOR PLATE APPROPRIATELY SIZED ORIFICE CUT IN PLATE. NOT REQUIRED IF SYSTEM IS FOR POLLUTION/,' CONTROL ONLY TYPE II. CATCH BASIN OR LARGER IF REQUIRED - NOTE - ALL METAL PARTS AND SURFACES MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL OR GALVANIZED. COMPLETE CORROSION PROTECTION MUST BE ASSURED. FLOW RESTRICTOR /OIL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE /CATCH BASIN Figure 1 35 -3- 3. Legal Description: Lots 1 through 7 in Block 18, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to the Plat thereof, fixed in Volume II of Plats, Page 24, Records of King County, Washington, except the portion thereof lying north easterly of a line beginning on the southwest line of Lot 1 at a point 72 feet south easterly of the most westerly comer of said lot and extending from said point north westerly line of lot 1 and the projection thereof to the northerly boundary of said lot 1. If further information is required, please notify me. Very truly yours, "eloteivi James 'E Gudger J E Gem Section 11, #3: Outfall and drain will be as specified by King County Hydrotics, The Attached sketch of bank stabilization and flow restriction as required by King County represent methods to be employed. The outfall will contain a flap gate (with head calculations) as designed by the civil engineer and approved by the County as required by the Flood Control Permit. In addition a concrete recessed headwall and a 5° to 10° offset will be designed at the discharge. Section II, #4: The site will be left in its natural state with the exception of areas cleared and filled as indicated in the attached sketch. Cleared /filled areas not covered by pavement will receive a ground cover not yet determined. If required by the City, ground cover may be subject to approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Section II, #10: The following is a list of materials to be stored and handled which may be considered as a risk factor: Class IA - Class IC - Class II - Class III - Class III - 1100 gals. (paints and thinners) 400 gals.(paint) 1000 gals. (paint) 1000 gals. (paint) 4000 gals. (polyester resin) outside storage Other materials stored/handled are outlined above. All of the above materials will be handled and stored as required by the Fire Code and with normal care. A high hazard sprinkler system will be employed. Section II, #13: Automobile traffic will be as indicated above . Average truck traffic will be approximately 15 units per day with a slight peaking of activity at 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Most truck activity will be of the "van" type with occasional "semi" being used. Shoreline Management Permit: 1. The enclosed drawing indicates estimated ordinary high water mark based on site observation and survey data available to date. Ordinary high water at 9000 c.f.s. occurs at +15.7 feet. The owner wishes to receive approval of the Shoreline Management Permit and Environmental Check List before authorizing further expenditures for design and engineering services. If required by the City, we would request that approval be granted subject to positive verification of the high water line based on more complete survey data prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. See Section II, #3 above. 23 September 1977 Mr. Gary Crutchfield City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: International Sales Project, Tukwila Dear Mr. Crutchfield: The following is in response to your letter of 31 August 1977 requesting additional information on the Environmental Questionnaire and the Shoreline Management Permit: Environmental Questionnaire: Section 1, #6: The facility is a distribution warehouse with associated office space for management, clerical and sales personnel. 20,000 square feet of warehouse space and 4,000 square feet of office space will be provided. Distribution of goods will be occurring throughout the day by truck as outlined under. Section II, it3 below. Auto- mobile traffic will be as required for 25 staff and management personnel. Approx- imately 16,000 square feet of parking will be provided. Materials stored will be gaskets, sheet goods, miscellaneous hardware items, rope, wire line and similar materials as well as paints, resins and thinners listed under Section II, #10 below. Section II, #1: The attached drawing indicates extent of land to be cleared which is the same as extent of land to be filled. Volume of fill is approximately 5600 cu. yards. Type of fill is to be engineered fill as approved by the project's soils engineer. Exact composition and origin of the fill material cannot be determined until after the bidding process is complete as fill selection will be at the contractors discretion subject to the approval mentioned above. Availability and location of material cannot be determined this far ahead of bidding. Similarly the manner of fill (lifts, equipment used, etc.) will vary with fill material selected and must be specified after the engineers analysis and approval of material submitted. Building and parking areas will be compacted to 95% of optimum density with planting and bank areas compacted to 35% max. density. ARCHIII_CTURAL 320 NATIONAL BLDG. PHONE RESOURCES 1008 WESTERN (206) COLLABORATIVE SEATTLE, WA. 98104 622-9360 A2fr3 •-.1111AL Mr-u c -vco cr•-a• • •,3 .1 2.t'a-.1-.-r..M.c> 1.:* 40 140 4 C.CC:c1-4.0 P11.)Lit3.440.50 Ckt try.i.v) 04-1% Ita ftl , • trgl,ur3VAMEt`e it 1. (11 • L"..." ct•_ of0:44../j P. • ri ■43'D at 11.3 11.0 ef-IA= AtawNt Arx-A. • INTERNATIONAL • WAREHOUSE SALES OFFICE 7 ry 0POtpni ait"),r101.10.t. ii : . gi ti-13 114 .+A 171'11.04,44.44-4( Lii.4 tawa c 12:16 ; • 4) 4. .51 • • rip • . • . . . • • 26 September 1977 Mr. Gary Crutchfield City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: International Sales Project, Tukwila Dear Mr. Crutchfield: Per our discussion in your office of 23 September 1977, I am enclosing a revised sketch indicating a more easterly entry to the site. This version is in response to Section II, 013 in your letter of 31 August 1977. Very truly yours, Gene Gudger GG/em Enclosure ARCHITECTURAL 320 NATIONAL BLDG. PHONE RESOURCES 1008 WESTERN (206) COLLABORATIVE SEATTLE, WA. 98104 622-9360 fi 11.0 15.1 3.4 i 19, 4P gal r.r.A L. Lae t o 1w+CY FtM9pk15\`u11f ' PAAJ" Z u_ -G Lau¢ B u u o�Gltr-4' 3. F41. wl.uM APP. gGoo ' 4640=1 -l1t 10pEJiQ1.JAT LJ -U2544.-1 N • INTERNATIONAL WAREHOUSE SALES OFFICE PROPOSAL - - 'P - .? '€'PT` 1 9 1434' w ARD rrEC 1 R4L 320 wQanwi a a R-ct.E FESCUFCES =000 WESTERN 1209 .o011Ae RATIVE SEATTLE. WA. 98104 622 9060 0 20 40 40 .9 • • 23 September 1977 Mr. Gary Crutchfield City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: International Sales Project, Tukwila Dear Mr. Crutchfield: The following is in response to your letter of 31 August 1977 requesting additional information on the Environmental Questionnaire and the Shoreline Management Permit: Environmental Questionnaire: Section 1, #6: The facility is a distribution warehouse with associated office space for management, clerical and sales personnel. 20,000 square feet of warehouse space and 4,000 square feet of office space will be provided. Distribution of goods will be occurring throughout the day by truck as outlined under Section II, #3 below. Auto- mobile traffic will be as required for 25 staff and management personnel. Approx- imately 16,000 square feet of parking will be provided. Materials stored will be gaskets, sheet goods, miscellaneous hardware items, rope, wire line and similar materials as well as paints, resins and thinners listed under Section II, #10 below. Section 11, #1: The attached drawing indicates extent of land to be cleared which is the same as extent of land to be filled. Volume of fill is approximately 5600 cu. yards. Type of fill is to be engineered fill as approved by the project's soils engineer. Exact composition and origin of the fill material cannot be determined until after the bidding process is complete as fill selection will be at the contractors discretion subject to the approval mentioned above. Availability and location of material cannot be determined this far ahead of bidding. Similarly the manner of fill (lifts, equipment used, etc.) will vary with fill material selected and must be specified after the engineers analysis and approval of material submitted. Building and parking areas will be compacted to 95% of optimum density with planting and bank areas compacted to 35% max. density. ARCHITECTURAL 320 NATIONAL BLDG. PHONE RESOURCES 1008 WESTERN (206) COLLABORATIVE SEATTLE, WA. 98104 622-9360 • • -2- Section II, #3: Outfall and drain will be as specified by King County Hydrolics, The Attached sketch of bank stabilization and flow restriction as required by King County represent methods to be employed. The outfall will contain a flap gate (with head calculations) as designed by the civil engineer and approved by the County as required by the Flood Control Permit. In addition a concrete recessed headwall and a 5° to 10° offset will be designed at the discharge. Section II, #4: The site will be left in its natural state with the exception of areas cleared and filled as indicated in the attached sketch. Cleared /filled areas not covered by pavement will receive a ground cover not yet determined. If required by the City, ground cover may be subject to approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Section II, #10: The following is a list of materials to be stored and handled which may be considered as a risk factor: Class IA - Class IC - Class II - Class III - Class III - 1100 gals. (paints and thinners) 400 ga.ls.(paint) 1000 gals. (paint) 1000 gals. (paint) 4000 gals. (polyester resin) outside storage Other materials stored/handled are outlined above. All of the above materials will be handled and stored as required by the Fire Code and with normal care. A high hazard sprinkler system will be employed. Section II, #13: Automobile traffic will be as indicated above. Average truck traffic will be approximately 15 units per day with a slight peaking of activity at 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Most truck activity will be of the "van" type with occasional "semi" being used. Shoreline Management Permit: 1. The enclosed drawing indicates estimated ordinary high water mark based on site observation and survey data available to date. Ordinary high water at 9000 c.f.s. occurs at +15.7 feet. The owner wishes to receive approval of the Shoreline Management Permit and Environmental Check List before authorizing further expenditures for design and engineering services. If required by the City, we would request that approval be granted subject to positive verification of the high water line based on more complete survey data prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. See Section II, #3 above. • • -3- 3. Legal Description: Lots 1 through 7 in Block 18, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, according to the Plat thereof, fixed in Volume II of Plats, Page 24, Records of King County, Washington, except the portion thereof lying north easterly of a line beginning on the southwest line of Lot 1 at a point 72 feet south easterly of the most westerly comer of said lot and extending from said point north westerly line of lot 1 and the projection thereof to the northerly boundary of said lot 1. If further information is required, please notify me. Very truly yours, .400edte•efiae, James EE'., Gudger JEG /em OFFSET FRAME GRATE SO THAT RESTRICTOR /POLLUTION DEVICE IS VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND. DIRECTLY OVER THE LADDER— GRATE ELEVATION CHAIN - 200# CAPACITY SLACK WHEN GATE IS .DOWN WELD CHAIN TO CB FRAME STD. GALV. CB LADDER STEPS WATERTIGHT CLEAN - OUT GATE WITH MIN. 8" GAUGE SLIDE .INLET INLET PIPE MIN. SLOPE .5% OVERFLOW ELEVATION - SET TO PROVIDE REQUIRED DETENTION AND ADEQUATE OIL SEPARATION PRO - TECTION. OVERFLOW PIPE & OUTLET PIPE MUST HAVE CAPACITY EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN COMBINED INLET SYSTEM -FEW,' OUTLET PIPE INVERT ELEVATION-7 RESTRICTOR PLATE APPROPRIATELY SIZED ORIFICE CUT IN PLATE. NOT REQUIRED IF SYSTEM IS FOR POLLUTION/ CONTROL ONLY—' TYPE II. CATCH BASIN OR LARGER IF REQUIRED MINIMUM SLOPE - .5 %. NOTE - ALL METAL PARTS AND SURFACES MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL OR GALVANIZED, COMPLETE CORROSION PROTECTION MUST BE ASSURED. FLOW RESTRICTOR /OIL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE /CATCH BASIN Figure 1 35 RIP RAP OR SPALLS Fc.- 21:67 -IH RIVER BOTTOM NATURAL. GROUND B. MIN. TOP OF SLOPE WIDTH 1- `C.MIN. TOE WIDTH 41-o - E.MIN. THICKNESS AT TOE OF SLOPE F.MAX•TOE ELEV. AFT. BELON! R K.ft.THICKNESS OF TOE IVER BOTTOM M 3 -0 NAME OF PROJECT RIVER ''-e-�" • LOCATION ID°"" "��`Y DATE ". "' $,%qr TITLE: RIP RAP WITHOUT LEVEE : Z• -0 L. 6 �4�,,.1,..� -.� SPECIFICATION ROCK RIP RAP 40 -so% SQwqs - sod' 2S-3S7. 5b' -Ioo4 _ LS-3S %.... . 100* - ISo OW �.� hi • 1 "\ s\)& . t ‘ \ \ P\ ' N NAlkii. y�A1- L►'f ' 5.3114 5VE:2MACr S laity N)1.-U&1 a AFV. 5600 •v3 4ti",s tC WIJe V004(1- 1Ajb6.J - U 28N4 u '``'NA/ 2� —t ) G PTPnei Tmewr /ASaizcY Eltz-4±:e-wt2- - -- PWP. uue e.wr. agy 4 6 9 143RD 8r ?O y 0 INTERNATIO \I I, ( WAREHOUSE SAL ,ES OFFICE PROPOSAL r, , V. L2_L �. 320 NATO M L BLDG ROE FF90LFCES 007 KEW (20 ,OaLA80RNAv£ SEATTIF. Y.A. Bar.. E22•33f8 0 20 4 '.> l.D . • • FIRE DEPARTMENT CITY of TUKWILA 444 ANDOVER PARK EAST TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 TELEPHONE: (206) 244 -7221 City of Tukwila Planning Dept. Aug. 24, 1977 Re: International Sales proposed facility. The explanation of the Risk of Upset (Item #10) does not appear to be entirely accurate. In my conversations with representatives from International Sales, I am under the opinion that their entire operation deals with flammable, reactive and possibly explosive material (Methyl- Ethyl Ketone Peroxide). In view of the close proximity to dense population (residences and the Riverside Inn), I suggest that a more detailed, definitive description of the entire operation and building contents be submitted for review before any approval is considered. cc: TFD file. Fire Chief. Sincerely: James Hoel, Fire Marshal. 31 August 1977 CITY cof UKWEILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. James E. Gudger ARC 320 National Building 1008 Western Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: International Sales Project, Tukwila Dear Mr. Gudger: This office, as well as other affected departments, has reviewed the Environ- mental Questionnaire submitted in conjunction with application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for the International Sales proposal located at the junction of Interurban Avenue and South 143rd Street in Tukwila. A determination of the project's significance cannot be made without additional information and the application for Shoreline Permit also requires additional information, both as outlined below. Environmental Questionnaire Section I, #6: The description of the proposal, in this particular case, is insufficient to provide appropriate insight as to the details of the facility's operation. Section II, #1: Please submit sufficient data and drawing to indicate extent of site to be cleared, area to be filled, amount and type of fill, origin of fill, and manner in which fill is to be accomplished. (This should address building /parking areas as well as storm drain line and outfall.) Section II, #3: Please submit a cross - section depicting proposed storm drain line and outfall as well as manner of bank stabilization. Section II, #4: How will the site be treated in terms of landscaping? Section II, #10: To sufficiently determine the impact in this respect, please provide a detailed description of the materials /chemicals to be handled or stored, their degree of flammability /explosiveness /toxicity, and manner of protection to be employed to preclude damage to both the natural and human environments. 6230 Southcenter Boulevard u Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (206) 242-2177 Mr. James E. Gudger Page 2 ARC 31 August 1977 Section II, #13: Please provide an estimated number of anticipated vehicle trips, particularly trucks, and peak trip hours. Also, the site plan indi- cates the ingress /egress point to cross Maule Avenue, an unimproved public right -of -way. To avoid potential problems associated with this fact, we suggest such ingress /egress point be moved easterly to intersect with South 143rd Street. Shoreline Management Permit 1. The site plan must include the location of the ordinary high water mark, that is, the entire length of such line rather than the river's edge or random elevation points. 2. Please include the cross - section of the storm drain line and outfall as well as manner of bank stabilization. 3. Please indicate the manner of treatment of the River Zone (40 feet land- ward measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark). 4. Please provide a legal description of the site for which the permit is requested. As previously stated, a determination of the project's significance cannot be made without the additional information described or requested above. In addi- tion, the supplemental information regarding the Shoreline Management Permit is necessary to the application and said application will be held in abeyance until such time as a Threshold-Determination of the project's significance is made in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act guidelines and Tukwila ordi- nance #986. Should you have any questions, please contact this office at your convenience. S ince 1y, Gary Cru thfield Ass4- s.tatft Planner GC /ch SePPv• Arka leQ • ef rom AC G t 55 QWO 55 etAAAA - - vt wuR areCk Qcces5 ? 5 /4+ vV viwttut ro d i-u ui ss ex tJ / p3 zasy- ri5k- EsiiwtatzA wu.�wlocr of v�.�'cc� (24411UAlI4A1 — twr*As — - RA — 6W4¢. -tv 1ac 141fr.& „kw ,wawKol Wu/ �1 CITY OF TUKWILA E JV I ROIWNTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV I EOPORM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: INTERNATIONAL SALES, Warehouse & Office Project Between Riverside Inn and Oak Harbor Freight 22 August 1977 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) - (reviewer) p( Building: 62.'f /9 7 % by: Cut gA,fre-i) ❑ 9 En ineerin by: Engineering: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: i2 . , (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental . impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, Phone . In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. • CITY OF TUKWILA ENV I ROWNTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV I.EOORM PROJECT NAME: INTERNATIONAL SALES, Warehouse & Office Project PROJECT ADDRESS: Between Riverside Inn and Oak Harbor Freight DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 22 August 1977 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) - (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: Engineering: l -J3 -9*-7 by: • , ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: 2e e077 79( dt.41; L/G EC a6 - �- arreez4-1-1 e i (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL). 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete 'environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, Phone . In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. CITY OF TUKWILA Alk ENV I RO` ENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV I EEORM PROJECT NAME: INTERNATIONAL SALES, Warehouse & Office Project PROJECT ADDRESS: Between Riverside Inn and Oak Harbor Freight DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 22 August 1977 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: 3R. Fire: 5 e %9 a► 4re., - ('24'77 by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: (revi ewer) 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: e-e. /9H44a 5-44- �� f'r C0kol e 5 �4"• (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental . impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, Phone . In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. III CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons, applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible. Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold • determination. 1. BACKGROUND .1.• Name of Proponent: International Sales 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 505 S. Lander Seattle, Washington (22_()040 3. Date Checklist Submitted: August 1$., 1977 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: NSA. 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 20,000 sq. ft. of warehouse and 4000 sq. ft. of office pace Approximately 16,000 sq. ft. of parking and loading 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Junction of Interurban .Ave and 143rd on vacant site (see - attached site plan). Area requires fill due to flood plain. Extent of area affected shown on site plan. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April 1978 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES X NO_____ (b). King County Hydraulics Permit YES _X N0_T (c) Building permit YES X NO • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO (f) Sign permit YES NO _ (g) Mater hook up permit YES X_ NO (h) Storm water system permit YES X NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X N0____ (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO .(1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Shoreline Management Substantial Development. Permit Attached. II.. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- X ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? _ X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? - -2- (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, • either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: See Attached 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ' (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground graters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground graters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO X X X .r X X X X X X • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in . ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage_. of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters ?. (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: See Attached 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? . (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, f or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? __X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: See Attached 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X X (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _Explanation: See attached X 11. Population. Explanation:. • • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result (a) (b) (c) (d) Generation of additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? Impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: See attached in: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X • (f) Other governmental services? • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: No altered service required. other than normal for addition of a new building. 15. Energy. Will.the proposal result.in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b). Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: No altered utilities other than normally required for addition of a new building. 17. Human.Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 1 X x x X X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title James E. fudger— architect A ? C 320 National Building PCQ Se tle Wasnington 98104 6229360 -8- 12 August 1977 Date X II Environmental Impact Explanations: 1. Earth b. Required fill to raise building above flood plain will be compacted c. see above - no other anticipated changes 3. Water b. Asphalt and roof areas will affect runoff. All improved areas will be served. by a storm system daylighting into the Duwamish river. c. Flood waters occasionally occupy portions of the site. The building fill area may occupy portion of the flood plain depending on high. water mark. d.. Surface water for unproved area will be delivered to the Duwamish River. e. See d. above. 4 Flora. a.. building site will be cleared of existing blackberry bushes. No trees. are involved. ?0 Risk of lir)set. a. No unusual risk of explosion exists. The facility is involved in storage and distribution of some types of paint, fiberglass, resins, etc. 13. Transportation/Circulation a. Staff parking and truck delivery will be accommodated on site. _•'a.ximu'n staff is estimated at 25. Truck traffic varies. b. .All parking will be accommodated on site per local zoning codes., d. New curb cut will occur along 143rd with resulting change in local traffic patterns. SGCf IoIJ/ r ATIOW e—o- do coy es G ltrt� .:. IMI. uw4 INTERNATIONAL WAREHOUSE SALES OFFICE PROPOSAL 5.5' 1 1 111111111 1.7/.: I /;,,.• /. - Ic--{1111 11 II.. /. ,„,:;.,/..:.. te. ...... i�; - oce 1 Ir: , gas' 4P C.-r.umAL Lk Incou'Vr419:15\:1-11' 14'4L 214.1:i_- a LJILIGELljgr114BD S. MLA MN-WA E APP. ■ &co •D3 4-6110=1-a1t 12106iQ ATbU - U25+4.1 ESVTDVIp66 9M511 I-lE a!9 a irriq ut, /Aonzay. so SY7RI�I�TI - -- PvoP LIUe exJar. E4.Ev • fiAP, :T9V2e°`rr 143 an e1 co INTERNATIONAL WAREHOUSE SALES OFFICE PROPOSAL Jl._ ARC- TECnhAL 320 N AMN AL BLOC. PHONE FESOI.ncES Noe WESTERN 12061 COUAeoP TT E SEATTLE. WA. 9601 6229360 o 20 40 co 60