Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA EPIC-FD-42 - VIP'S RESTAURANT - EXPANSION AND MOTEL REZONE
VIP'S RESTAURANT 5700 SOUTHCENTER BLVD EPIC -FD -42 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNIT'Y DEVELOPMENT P 442440 D/F I NAL ,1 4#4 WITHDRAWAL OF AFFIRl°1ATIVE THRESHOLD DETERMITTIoN* Description of proposal VIP'S Restaurant Expansion and Mntel Rezni from C -1 and R -3 to C -2 and RMH Proponent VIP'S Restaurants, Inc. Location of Proposal 5700 Southcenter Boulevard Lead Agency City of Tukwila q2 File No. EPIC -FD ,° This proposal has been determined to elterrelnot have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (4.s/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the, lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title OCD Director Date 15lluly 1977 *COMMENTS: Signature This withdrawal of the affirmative threshold determination is based upon the applicant's modifications to the proposal as listed below: 1. Landscape Plan dated 11 July 1977, Exhibit MF- 77- 11 -R(A); 2. Preliminary Grading Plan dated 25 June 1977, Exhibit MF -77- 11 -R(B); 3. Storm Drainage Plan dated 11 July 1977, Exhibit MF- 77- 11 -R(C); 4. Exterior Materials Plan as outlined in letter dated 7 July 1977, . Exhibit MF- 77.- 11 -R(D); 5. Ingress- egress Report by TRANSPO Group dated June 1977 and entitled "Traffic Analysis: Southcenter VIP'S Expansion," Exhibit MF-77-11-R(E). 4 :� �- /f /9 77 Withdrawal of Afmative Threshold Determination Page 2 In addition to the abovementioned modifications, this withdrawal is conditioned upon the following stipulations: 1. A reclamation bond be posted with the City of Tukwila in an amount equal to 100% the cost of grading and landscpaing above the 90 -foot contour line, per submitted plans ( Exhibits MF 77- 11 -R(A) and (B) ). 2. That portion of the subject site lying above the 150 -foot contour line remain in its natural state. 3. Any freestanding sign used to identify the premises, either the restaurant or the motel, shall not be placed above the 90 -foot contour line. 4. Construction of trail from top of slope connecting existing V open storm drainage system of slope end of and -to':iouthcenter Blvd. 5. All deciduous shade trees south, west or east of the proposed structure to be a minimum of 3" caliper at time of planting and healthy. 6. Adequate provisions for parking for construction employees and construction materials storage be provided. Ae4 /s i9 77 Ci of Tukwila 4�a4 Planning:Dvision ' q :8200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 : , : 433 -1845 Office ofCommuni - DeVelo amen . , tY p . -. 17 March 1980_ Van Volkenburg Associates, Arch:: 29808 First Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98'003 Re :. Vip's Motel Preliminary Concept As requested during . our -discussion of 7 March. 1980,. our office has reviewed the subject plan set ( undated) and offers the following observations: The site plan indicates development of a parking area at the north- east corner of the site, in apparent conflict with provision a) of section 3, ordinance 1031. 1) 2) After. walking the site, I -am concerned about the _feasibility of ex- -: tensive grading and construction in the area indicated by your plan. Additional study of the environmental aspects of your . revised pro - posal will .be-necessary .- The scope of modifications_ envisioned-in your plan are significantly divergent from the ,.donditions:imposed by the responsible official in the withdrawal_ ..of.: affirmative :. threshold.determination dated 15 July 1977 (EPIC- FD -42). To construct the project as you now propose, it. appears that a new applica -. for environmental review and re- hearing of zoning conditions. imposed under ordinance 1031, will be necessary:_ Please note. that should you wish to re- hear- the zoning: conditions and environmental checklist, all aspects -. of the "project- will,_be ° -,open .to:re- examination; and; in essence, the project will' be treated as a new application • lease call me` you .hare further questions: k Caughey - ing Director.; J- 600 -04 August 8, 1978 Stepan & Associates, Inc. 32123 First Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98003 Attn: Mr. Chuck Gustafson Re: Visual Inspection of Cut $lope VIPS Restaurant at Southcenter Tukwila, Washington -.Gentlemen: HART CROWSER & associates inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING In accordance with your request and in the accompaniment of Mr. Chuck Gustafson, the subject cut slope was inspected on 24 July 1978, by a geotechnical engineer from our firm. This inspection was limited to visual examination of the slope for the purpose of evaluating the exposed soils, observed water seepage, local- ized sloughing of the slope, and possible corrective measures. Inspection of the slope and review of survey data provided subse- '� quen.t to the inspection, indicates that the slope has a total vertical height of approximately 50 feet. An approximately eight -foot wide bench was located about mid - height with original planned slope inclinations of 1:1 both above and below the bench. It is our understanding that the purpose of the bench was to support a paved pedestrian walkway, but that a recent change in plans has eliminated this walkway from the bench. Soils'exposed in the slope above the bench appear to consist of relatively hard and cohesive silt and /or glacial till. No indi- cation of water seepage,or sloughing were observed in these soils. Soils exposed in`the slope below the bench consisted mostly of slightly silty to silty fine to medium sand having little or no cohesion and considerably higher permeability than the cohesive soils' exposed above the bench. The' approximate change in the soil' types appeared.to occur at or slightly below the level: of the bench. ;In many areas stratification could be seen in the soils below the bench suggesting water deposition,.most,likely as glacial outwa•sh:...These soils were also moist to wet. in many areas below the bench. Areas of cleaner sand soils had also apparently undergone significant sloughing of the original 1:1 slope:resulting in oversteepened areas near the bench and accumu- lation 'of.loose.soil'debris near the toe of the slope. Inspection of areas above the slope indicated surface water drain- age conditions with some potential for discharge of concentrated run -off onto'the slope during periods of high rainfall. In addition, significant water discharge was observed during our inspectio1 —i rom an existing marsh area .immediately above the DESIGN SERVICE BUILDING, :1910 FAIRVIEW AVENUE EAS1 SEATTLE, WASH. 98102;: (208) 324 -9530 N WASHINGTON PLAZA, SUITE 1414, TACOMA, WASPI. 98402. (206) 572-5158 ' -Tall Free From Seattle to .Tacoma, 638 -0824, �' ''Stepan & Associat•, Inc. August 8, 1978 • J- 600 -04 Page 2 northeast part of the slope as shown on the subsequent survey data. Because of heavy bramble vegetation, the source of this water could not be precisely determined, but seepage from a subsurface source appears likely. Discharge of this water was occuring downslope and onto the cut bench resulting in standing water at some locations on the bench up to several inches deep. In our opinion this standing surface water on the bench is probably seeping downward through the relatively permeable sand soils to emerge from the lower part of the cut slope. This emergence of water would account for the observed wet conditions on the slope below the bench and is likely responsible for much of the observed soil sloughing. In our opinion three courses of action should be employed to mini- mize future problems with this slope as outlined below. 1) Control of Drainage ' rainage of surface runoff near the slope should be collected and directed away from the slope. Of particular concern in this regard is the observed seepage near the northeast corner marsh that is presently finding its way to the bench. One practical solution would be to collect this water immediately downslope of the marsh and carry it in a closed conduit straight down the slope to its toe.: Because subsurface water may also be emerging downslope of the marsh, we also recommend placement of a subsur- face drainage trench along the inside edge of the existing dirt path immediately below the marsh. This drain should consist of a minimum 12 -inch width trench extend- ing to a minimum depth of four feet and filled with filter mater - ial meeting the requirements of the State of Washington Sepcification 9- 03.12(4) for "Gravel Backfill for Drains" having the following gradation. requirements: Sieve Size Percent Passing 2%" square opening 4" square opening U.S. #8 U.S. #50 U.S. #200 95 - 100 '30 - 60 20 - 50 .3 - 12 0 - 2. The bottom of the drain should contain a minimum four inch diameter perforated pipe sloped to drain with the perforations placed down and an envelope of at least four inches of free - draining filter material conforming to the above requirements that surrounds the drain pipe. The outlet of this subsurface drain pipe could be connected to the closed conduit carrying surface water downslope from the marsh. - "Stu an & Associates, Inc. August 8, 1978 J- 600 -04 Page 3 To avoid migration of water to the lower cut face, we also recom- mend that the bottom and outside wall of the subsurface drain trench be lined with an impermeable barrier of visqueen or other similar material. Other drainage conditions from developed and natural areas above the slope should also be carefully evaluated for existing and potential runoff problems. Re- design should be utilized as necessary to minimize the risk of runoff or overflow discharging onto the slope. 2) Flattening of Slope Although the cohesive soils above the existing bench are likely to remain relatively stable at the 1:1 slope, the granular and relatively non- cohesive sands explored below the bench are likely to seek a natural angle of repose on the order of 30 to 35 degrees from the horizontal. Elimination of water seepage from above would help reduce soil sloughing, but as the sands dry out, they would again tend to behave as a granular material flowing like :sugar to reach the natural angle of repose. Consequently, we recommend that at least the lower part of the slope below the bench be re- graded to an inclination less steep than the original 1:1 In our opinion these soils would be marginally stable at an inclin- ation of.12 horizontal to 1 vertical and an even flatter inclina- tion of 1 -3/4 horizontal to 1 vertical would be preferable. Our review of the survey cross - section indicates that at least a, 1 %:1 and probably a 1 -3/4:1 slope could be provided without significant loss of parking area if the existing bench is eliminated. With elimination of the pedestrian path across the bench and adequate control of surface runoff, we see no need to maintain this bench as part of the permanent cut slope. 3) Establishment of Vegetative Cover Because of the relatively erosive nature of the soils exposed in the cut slope (especially the. lower sand soils)," it is imperative that erosion protection be provided on the slope at the earliest possible time. Even with proper runoff control, suchl protection . is needed to avoid erosion from rain falling directly on the slope as well as removal of dried surface soils by wind. Generally, . provision of a continuous vegetative cover is one of the most effective and attractive means of providing such protection. : Stepan & Associates, Inc. An&ust 8, 1978 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service project. If you have any questions, or we can assistance, please contact us at your earliest Sincerely, HART - CROWSER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6Plenovtoul- 6144/, THOMAS M. GAVIN Project Engineer JOHN C. CROWSER Professional Engineer •TMG:1lr J- 600 -04 Page 4 to you on this be of additional convenience. • • APPENDIX - 7011.7012 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TABLE NO. 70-C REQUIRED SETBACKS FROM PERMIT AREA BOUNDARY (IN FEET) Additional width may be required for interceptor drain. r Face of Structure Toe of Slope exceed but need not �� exceed 10' Max. Top of Slope Face of Footing 11/2 but need not exceed 15' Max. FIGURE 2 Drainage and Terracing Sec. 7012. (a) General. Unless otherwise indicated on the approved grading plan, drainage facilities and terracing shall conform to the provi- sion of this Section. (b) Terrace. Terraces at least 6 feet in width shall be established at not more than 30 -foot vertical intervals on all cut or fill slopes to control sur- face drainage and debris except that where only one terrace is required, it shall be at mid- height. For cut or fill slopes greater than 60 feet and up to 120 feet in vertical height one terrace at approximately mid - height shall be 12 feet in width. Terrace widths and spacing for cut and fill slopes greater than 120 feet in height shall be designed by the civil engineer and approved by the Building Official. Suitable access shall be provided to permit proper cleaning and maintenance. Swales or ditches on terraces shall have a minimum gradient of 5 percent and must be paved with reinforced concrete not less than 3 inches in thickness or an approved equal paving. They shall have a minimum depth at the deepest point of 1 foot and a minimum paved width of 5 feet. A single run of Swale or ditch shall not collect runoff from a tributary area exceeding 13,500 square feet (projected) without discharging into a down drain. (c) Subsurface Drainage. Cut and fill slopes shall be provided with sub- surface drainage as necessary for stability. 684 SETBACKS ' H a b' Under 5 0 1 5 - 30 H/2 H/5 Over 30 15 6 Additional width may be required for interceptor drain. r Face of Structure Toe of Slope exceed but need not �� exceed 10' Max. Top of Slope Face of Footing 11/2 but need not exceed 15' Max. FIGURE 2 Drainage and Terracing Sec. 7012. (a) General. Unless otherwise indicated on the approved grading plan, drainage facilities and terracing shall conform to the provi- sion of this Section. (b) Terrace. Terraces at least 6 feet in width shall be established at not more than 30 -foot vertical intervals on all cut or fill slopes to control sur- face drainage and debris except that where only one terrace is required, it shall be at mid- height. For cut or fill slopes greater than 60 feet and up to 120 feet in vertical height one terrace at approximately mid - height shall be 12 feet in width. Terrace widths and spacing for cut and fill slopes greater than 120 feet in height shall be designed by the civil engineer and approved by the Building Official. Suitable access shall be provided to permit proper cleaning and maintenance. Swales or ditches on terraces shall have a minimum gradient of 5 percent and must be paved with reinforced concrete not less than 3 inches in thickness or an approved equal paving. They shall have a minimum depth at the deepest point of 1 foot and a minimum paved width of 5 feet. A single run of Swale or ditch shall not collect runoff from a tributary area exceeding 13,500 square feet (projected) without discharging into a down drain. (c) Subsurface Drainage. Cut and fill slopes shall be provided with sub- surface drainage as necessary for stability. 684 VVPVI! 1 RESTAURANTS *INC. 250 LIBERTY S.E., SUITE 200, SALEM, ORE. 97301 PHONE 585 -6221 July 14,1977 Mr. Fred Satterstrom City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila,WA 98188 Re: Trail at Vip's Motel Property Dear Mr. Satterstrom, Vip's Restaurants,Inc., purposes that a trail be established in joint cooperation with the city at the extreme west end of the property in question. We feel that the majority of the trail could be done by the city, on city property. However, if because of the existing topo- graphy, or slope restrictions, a small portion of the trail would lie upon Vip's property, we would deed the portion in question over to the city. We feel this to be in the best interest of both parties. The city would be allowed flexibility in the layout of the trail, and Vip's Restaurants, Inc. would be removed from the liability and maintenance of any part of the trail. Vip's Restaurants,Inc. claims right of review and final approval of any taking of property as a result of the city locating a foot trail. Sincerely, Alan Blanchard Architect AB:lh cc: Hal_.Alsid 7Cl-}t 1311- MF 11- R tt) RESTAURANTS *INC. 250) LIBE +RTY S.E.,, SUITE 200, SALEM, IRE. MK PHONE 585=M Mr. Fred M. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila,Washington 98188 Dear Fred, July 7,1977 AL 121911 Of, YU Re: Exterior natet:ials :flom. proposed Vip's Mot1.11 a It is our intent to visually tie the proposed motel to, th existing restaurant building by the use of sirii.ar colors aiidi materials. In order to do that, we propose the following: us. 1. Major wall surfaces: Concrete and /or masnnry= CoIumblar Light Buff. 2. Balcony. railings: Rough sawn cedar- with. o+l_ymp i,c Transparent Sta:i'i ?OOi a _ri:es. 3. Roof: Monray Concrete Tile-Collor to mttgh restaurant. 4. Misc..Woo:d Trim: Rough sawn members with Olympic heavy body stain- CoOfee. 5. Window frames: • ,and flag . p'oles : Medium bronze ai o,d z d aluminum.. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call CRD lh. Charles R.- )0ab1en Architect EX f /, ijy F ALSID, SNOWDEN & ASSOCIATES weittinirre CONSULTANTS IN AIR, WATER, SAFETY, HYGIENE & MANAGEMENT 13240 Northrup Way, Suite 21, Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206)641 -5130 July 5, 1977 City of Tukwila Office of Community Development Tukwila, Washington Dear Sir: vrP,s f u. Re: VIPS Restaurant and Motel Environmental Check List In recent months, VIPS personnel and your staff have had an opportunity to review the Environmental Check List submitted to you on March 4, 1977. During these meetings, the Impact Areas outlined in the checklist, were discussed and a detailed assessment into the method in which VIP'S, Inc. would be mitigating the indicated Impact Areas would be required additional assessment. These detailed assessments have been completed and we are at this time updating the origional check list submitted by VIPS on March 4, 1977 with the following studies: 1. Traffic Study 2. Services Required 3. Landscaping Plan 4. Soil Study 5. Grading Plan 6. Colored Rendering of the Finished Site and Associated Areas. 7. Exterior Materials If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact myself or Mr. C. Dahlen of VIPS, Salem, Oregon. Sincerely yours, ALSID, SNOWDEN & ASSOCIATES H. Alsid HA /sr cc: C. Dahlen VIPS, Inc. 250 Liberty Street S.E. Salem, Oregon • MEMORANDUM O1 "FICE of CO•'..∎,1LTY 10 May 1977 TO: Kj el 1 StA nes FROM: FredP.terstrom SUBJECT: VIP's IE.I.S. On Monday, 9 May 1977, I conferenced with Hal Alsid and Chuck Dahlen of VIP's Restaurants regarding the key points of the E.I.S. for their motel /restaurant expansion proposal. As we had figured, they intend to proceed with the gathering of infor- mation only on the elements of the environment which are of eminent con- cern here. I.reiterated those points which were brought up at the initial meeting on 26 April 1977. These points are as follows: 1. Earth. How will the excavation activities affect the slope? How much material will be excavated and where will it be transported? A soils study was . requested along with a detailed grading plan and reclamation plan. 2. Water. A storm drainage plan was requested. An examination of groundwater was requested along with a plan for the handling of it. 3. Transportation /Circulation. An ingress /egress plan was requested. This plan must be coordinated with Public Works and the improve- ment to Southcenter Boulevard. 4. Aesthetics. A model. was requested which depicted the site improvements in relation to surrounding vicinity. What building materials will be used? Signage? 5. Landscaping. In conjunction with th4 reclamation plan, treat- ment of the site with landscaping must be specified. . .VIP's intends to proceed with this information gathering in hopes of modifying their proposal so as to obtain a negative declaration. I cautioned them that the end result may not necessarily.be a withdrawal of the affirmative declaration. There is no guarantee. They assured me that they understood this. I agreed to accept their information /reports /studies in segments as they were completed. This should give us some additional time to consider each element. All information, however, had to be in and a "gentleman's agreement" made regarding mitigating measures (or "modifying measures ") before a negative dec could be withdrawn and the public hearing advertised. VIP's seems willing to cooperate. FS /cw 29 April 1977 • MTV of TUKVIIILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY CEV L_OPP.RENT Mr. Bob Smith 250 Liberty Street S.E. P.O. Box 2508 Salem, Oregon 97308 RE: Your requirement for a full Environmental Impact Statement on your pro- posed development in Tukwila. Dear Mr. Smith: At this point I have made a declaration of significance on your project in Tukwila. You should therefore proceed with preparing the draft environmental impact statement after having a meeting with Mr. Satterstrom of this depart- ment regarding what information we would be looking for. You requested at a recent meeting that you be spared circulating the statement. For me to agree to this ahead of time would be to circumvent the very intent of SEPA. What I can.say -is that after the adverse impacts are identified, you can modify your proposal so as to mitigate those adverse impacts, then I am authorized under WAC 197 -10 -370 to withdraw my affirmative threshold determination. Please contact Mr. Satterstrom if you intend to proceed. I think this will minimize the time your company will need to spend on the document. Sincerely, KJELL STOKNES, DIRECTOR OFF E -OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT itbV#1!TWt NI red N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor KS /FNS /cw o 12 April 1977 7,9TY of K LA OF=FICE of CC■MLINITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Bob L. Smith VIP's Restaurants, Inc. P.O. Box 2508 Salem, Oregon 97308 RE: REZONE FROM R -3 AND C -1 TO RMH AND C -2 Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed herein is a "DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE" on the proposed rezone to allow a motor inn and restaurant expansion at Macadam Road and Southcenter Boulevard in Tukwila. The issuance of a DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE means that an environmental impact statement pursuant to SEPA is required before any permits (including your rezone request) can be duly processed. The following concerns were expressed by the questionnaire review departments: - additional traffic (volume, and ingress- egress) - utilities connection and relocation - earthmoving activities - geologic /soils conditions - drainage (surface and groundwaters) - scale of development The above are only a portion of the elements which will have to be addressed in the environmental impact statement. For your information, according to Ordinance 4986 of the City of Tukwila, you have the option of either allowing the City to prepare the draft and final EIS or preparing it yourself, possibly by retaining a private consultant. :In either case, the applicant is responsible for all costs associated with the EIS prepara- tion. I would advise that it is undoubtedly quicker to prepare the EIS yourself rather than having the City prepare it. I would suggest that we arrange a pre -EIS preparation conference to discuss the particular elements of the environment which require special attention. Please contact me early enough so that arrangements can be made to include other city department personnel. S ncere Fred N.tterstrom Planning Supervisor FNS /cw cc: Kjell Stoknes, Responsible Official - Dick Williams, Engineering - Al Pieper, Bldg. 29 :1 24•? -2177 r. i'u ":r:rl[, Jash.in7�on 81;. -. PARKS PECREATION 1 MEMORANDUM CITY of TUKWELA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • 11 April 1977 TO: Kjell Stoknes,� sponsible Official FROM: Fred Satters SUBJECT: VIP'S Environmental Checklist Attached herewith you will find the review comments of the Building, Engineering, and Planning Division on the environmental questionnaire submitted by VIP's for their proposed Motor Inn and Restaurant Expansion. Based on these comments, I would recommend that an impact statement be required due to the following reasons: FS /cw 1. The size of the project site is 216,600+ square feet, a significant size in relation to the south slope of the Tukwila Hill; 2. The "intensity" of the proposed project (113 -room motel, lounge for 50, and banquet room for 1.20). significantly impacts the sub - ject site and immediate vicinity; 3. The addition'of the motor inn on the undeveloped slope,r.epresents a significant change in use of that area of the site; 4. Evidence exists that points to possible environmental problems (i.e., potential sliding or instability problems and drainage problems)., II �y S I S D-� (A-1 l � . YIe..P j_as . . . .. .... . 5(6 o ---F f eh Bpi A4nel, a f Ga r►�-� ��TL < o W GZ� 5/5 . 40, 4/ 1,1A3 � , v(=4-0,; -) . C2 • RESTAURANTS* INC. 250 LIBERTY S.E., SUITE 200, SALEM, ORE. 97301 PHONE 585 -6221 April 7,1977 Gary Crutchfield City of Tukwila 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila,WA 98188 Dear Gary, Enclosed you will find a check for $250.00 to cover the cost of the rezone application and environmental checklist. On behalf of Vip's Restaurants, I would like to thank you, Fred & Kjell for your professional assistance. We hope to work closely with you as our project continues. Sincerely, dc9"/4-14-- Jim Stanek Project Manager JS:lh Encl. CITY OF TUKWILA 1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: VLt motor kv% AMA Ke6 -mAra ' bcramtiovl PROJECT ADDRESS: MaC2.4a-wi @ ,NwtAc vvttr Blvd. DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: 2/Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: (reviewer) tegiize, 2. ANY P RTINENT COMMENTS: (5 4 MVt&ean,a(atso LG 44014A k of iwittnivtivfiovi thaf i vttaitd on $iu IPO ovtr A 44 above Oat 114N/faze( WerrAvy r cxa w?ie, 4Golio evo5 &- Ocofov 61 Doi I #d.4 Ste, excavation atra.wi 4 jb, tv jre - Iwo ,oivct,y t railtill AAA taf -Fig roz viZw Ole a tllt * C/ i VtVi.rti q IL:ti o vio` AM.A. ', o -Forte • ,v r / 1 ti i mc. 4t N. Et 5 044 WA (oG v 1 wi reA wi-h4;owt xn4cr 4-40 * / (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Si„ Ap r i I ‘i,1 1'7 S g ture and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Staff Person Letter, Phone Date In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No: 9£36 -. III CITY OF TUKWILA 1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW; FORM PROJECT NAME: Oro Motor 1viii at&t R :ftfa wvt ExFAAA iovl PROJECT ADDRESS: Mac aA4A. @, Jj o Thc€wtcX Blvd • DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) e Building: G /'Z.' /1, f q7 7 by: i2 ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should / be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. ✓ The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. Porpr-' " Signature and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person - Letter, Phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL OUESTIOdNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: VI f" Mo-For- I v►vt *AAA ( cAtuArauvt rxpavm iM PROJECT ADDRESS: Mag,a4444,ek c . OLL4AGCiwitA, BbrA. 1 DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: B'Engineering: #71-//- 77 by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: ,�,,�� 5,01: /��a,c_,a / CI j)ePthJ 1y . Co.-,STRva Tida� er-Xuc' Gera /ce,J Go /cY c_re ∎C o 0,s / faro 6/-e-0.7-7s d.c% 4'c ci;`% < vi`Jf 9s 'D -,Ve)G 7io,v S re e af/ 1/ /50 ve Z' de_ c 647,7,/J 4 C/ ,',j Cede j e//_)o A) A.: GO/ mil e -T� 7, o /1 /40Y /7,0,0 er ir ",?: A (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. I The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. . Apr; II i 117? l r Sign ture and Title of Responsible Official Date 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by Date Staff Person Letter, Phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Bob L S 2. Address. Phone Number of Proponent:25A Liberty st S,F_ - P_©.Box 2508. Salem,Oregon 97308 (503) 585 -6271 3. Date Checklist Submitted: March 4,1977 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: city of TukwiJ. ,office of C mrrznniry nPValnpmanr 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Vip's Motor Inp & Rpstauranr Rxpancion 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an ac- curate understanding of its scope and nature): Motel with 113 rooms, Lounge for 50, Banquet Room for J70, Extra pining Form 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, in- cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of . the environmental setting of the proposal): Property around present Vip's Restaurant on South Center Blvd., Tukwila.WA. Site steeply sloped. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Late fa11,1977 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required-for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES x NO (b) King County Hydraulics Permit • YES x NO (c) Building permit _ YES x NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO DOUBTFUL (e) .Sewer hook up permit YES x NO (f) Sign permit YES NO _x (g) Water hook up permit YES x NO (h) Storm water system permit YES NO 0) Curb cut - permit YES NO x (j.) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No, proposal represents final development of the property. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NONE II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical-features? -2- YES MAYBE NO x x x (e). Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or.erosion, which ., may modify the chanhel of a river or.stream'or the bed of th.e ocean_or any bay, inlet or lake? - Explanation:- 35,000 cu. yards to be removed. No iv PimPiv: .41,01/P uos 10. Air. Will the proposal result in:- (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c).. Alteration of air movement,moisture or temperature, or. any change in climate, locally or regionally? - Explanation: YES MAYBE NO either 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction . of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates,. drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff ?. .(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change. in•the•amount of •surface water in any water • body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited_ . to ternperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through/7 interception•of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (f) (g) -3- (h). Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail - able for public water supplies? (i) YES MAYBE NO x Explanation s. l e) O ela WOA � ce, mac/ f t�LGJ (,- I Vua f G °Y walk t,W -1- taro- va wu4 watu'- f (ow 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in..a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d). Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: Existing scrub, rocks and weeds to be placed with Evergreens,Deciduous trees and native ground cover. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of•species,.or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? .(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: X 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? bb�� lAvta .101`tt) v)(1/1 Explanation: NIVA ... E 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new. •light or glare? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x 8: Land Use. Will. the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? 0 ?OLP Explanation: 9. Natural Resources: - Willtheproposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural. resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: • 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? - . Explanation: • VOG�J tet,tu f vd uk i vWo lVL tfuoti t' MAkia 4 -vta, tRimrtiTt. x • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 11� bv1v J i , irchvrin t,U 7cM Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO i t444-k/1) Explanation: Estimated traffic increase for Restaura t,Motel and Service Station 30 - 40 %. The shared nature of the development would tend to even . out the flow. The motel is planned to provide courtesy car service to. South Center and Airport. ru icam,wfievt, r 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x ( ) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy.. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy:, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the utilities: (a)- Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: P110 nom, wit/4, � eA46 r 0 �i 14 a a,+1 M S ,� f-,'U l5 r i Ar 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE MO Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc -. tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- i fensive site open to public view? Explanation: i,%ytj pyGd vim, d 1 .0,(16011 oda t t' witIA Ov i, ut 19 . UtAt 1 Vlm' o attAAt 0 Y yr i 5 -jam... Vu` In s i b i I�' o f w' t (t- GiAA4- 4 reap 'on. Will the proposal - result in an imp ct 'f- �� AG�� 19. Rec `t� upon the quality or quantity of exist -4 0 0 6 t'' ing recreational opportunities? x Explanation: 20.. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency- may- withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. - JOB Mzrrh 7,1977 Signature and Title . Date AFFIDAVIT I, Bob L. Smith being duly sworn, declare that I am the contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Contract•Purchaser or owner- 250 Liberty St.S.E. - P.O. Box 2508 (Mailing Address) Salem,Ore on 97308 (City (State) (503) 585 -6221 (Telephone Subscribed and sworn before me II"- this 09 day of Mr >aC,Y_ it 19 % 17 Nota Pub ' and for the State of 1 � { Oregon, residing at \\ �rrt- NI c- c1,A"v-r isStvty &V1 -5 , /i • ForM B APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF LAND USE CIASSIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF LAND USE REGULATIONS IN TEE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR OF= USE ONLY *Appl. No. Planning Canission Action Receipt No. Filing Date City Council Action Hearing Date Ordinance No. & Date APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURALLLY: Name Bob L. Smith, President Address 250 Liberty St.S.E. - P.O. Box 2508 onl)sR9_6991 Vip's Restauxants.Inc. Telephone No. Property Petitioned for rezoning is located on5700 South Center Blvd. (Tukwila Interchange) between Macadam Rd. and 62nd Ave. South Total square footage in property 216.600 sq.ft. plus. '-.1-LECIAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SEE ATTACHED. EXisting Zoning (Parcel D,C-1) (Parcel C,R-3) Zoning requested(Parcel D,C-2) (Parcel C RI hat are the uses you propose to. develop on this property? yo P 1 wi th 111 rooms, lourtSe for 50,-Banquet Room. for 120, extra Dining Room. Number of permanent off-street parking spaces .that will be provided on property? 211 Parking spares_08 Restaurant_ 113 Motel) Number required NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The .following factors are considered in reclassifying property or modifying .regulations. Evidence or • additional information you desire to submit to sdbstantiate- your request may be attache d to this sheet. -.(See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimum requjxenents.) 1. What provisions Will be made to screen adjacAt'and surrounding property from any incompatible effects which may arise as a result of thaproposed.land use classification? , 7 Heavy landscaping at rear and side with evergreens and riPr-i rir;nns tre ••• 2. Wbat provisions will be made to provide for necessary street widening to City mini= standards? Already improved. 3. What provisions will be made for_adequate sewer and uater service? Connections will be made to existing systems. A Any oth2r ccmments which the petitioner feels are appropriate: 'State Property Parcel A 15,000 Parcel B RMH 90,954' SE Parcel C ' R -3 41,496 SF. Parcel F 42,087 SF NORTH PARCEL LOCATION MAP 7603020561 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A Ul WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504 . • REAL ESTATE CONTRACT l0 IN THE MATTER OF SR 5, South 178th St. to South 126th St. CV THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this I/ day of listL# L./ ci 1976, between STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, reinafter O D called the. "seller" and V.I.P.'S RESTAURANTS, INC., an Oregon corporation, .0 hereinafter called the "purchaser" N WITNESSETH: That the seller agrees to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase from the seller the following described_ real estate in King County, State of Washington: That portion of Tract 35, Brookvale Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 47, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at a point opposite Highway Engineer's Station (here- inafter referred to as H.E.S.) P.C.(1 -RE) 158 +93.3 on the 1 -RE Line of State Highway Route 5 (PSH No. 1), South 178th St. to South • 126th St.,.and 70 feet northeasterly therefrom; thence northeast- erly 40 feet to a point opposite said. H.E.S. P.C.(1 -.RE): 158 +93.3 and 110 feet northeasterly therefrom; thence North 62 °00' West 103` feet, more or less, to intersect a line drawn parallel with and 140 feet southeasterly, when measured at right angles and /or radially, from the Mac. Road center line .survey of.said Highway; thence north -.. easterly and northerly, along said parallel. line, to the north line. of said Tract; thence west, .along said north line, to intersect a' line drawn. parallel with and 70 feet northeasterly, when measured at right angles and /or radially, from said Mac Road center line survey; thence southeasterly, southerly and southwesterly, along said parallel line, to a point 85 feet northeasterly, when measured at right angles, from the 1 -RE Line of said Highway; thence south - easterly in a straight line to the point of beginning. The purchaser herein, its successors or assigns,-sha11 have no right of ingress and egress to, from and between said highway, and the lands herein described nor shall the purchaser herein, its successors or assigns, be entitled to compensation for any loss of light, view and air occasioned by the location, construction, maintenance or operation of said highway. PHONE 926 -3320 JACKSON & PROCHNAU • I N C O R P O R A T E D CONSULTING FOREST ENGINEERS LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL. ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 177 ALBANY. OREGON 97321 January 17, 1974 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL B LEGAL DESCRIPTION RESTAURANT INDUSTRIES INC.. PORTION SECTION 23, T23N, R4E, W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON That portion of Tract 35 of Brookvale Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats,._on page 47, records of King County, Washington, and of the unplatted strip of land adjoining on the East, lying between the East line of said Tract 35 ( said East line being also the East line of the Southwest k of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ) and the West line of the Interurban Addition as'per plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, on Page 55, records of said County, described as a whole as follows: - Beginning at the intersection of the West line of said Interurban Addition. with the. Northerly line of Primary State Highway No. 1 RE as described in Parcel "A" in King County Superior Court Cause No. 600726; thence along said Northerly line, N65 °16'34" W 27.33 feet; thence, parallel with said West line of the Interurban Addition N 0 °53'34" E 147.58 feet; thence parallel with the Northerly line of said Highway No. 1 RE, N 65 °16'34" W 103.37 feet; thence N 24 °43'26 " °E 2.00 feet; thence parallel with theNortherly line of said Highway No. 1 RE, N 65°16'34" W 149.13 feet; thence S 76 °03'51" W 75.24 feet; thence S 24 °43'26" W 50.41 feet to a concrete highway R/W monument; thence N 64 °25'14" W 103.03 feet to a con.. crete highway R/W monument; thence along a 226.41 foot radius curve to the left, the long chord of which bears N 2 °03'30" W 173.97 feet to a steel rebar; thence S 89° 50'42" E 450.869 feet to a steel rebar; thence along the West line of said Interurban Addition, S 0 °53'34" W 419.68 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 2.088 acres, more or less. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONAIIRCEL F and PARCEL C MEMORANDUM OF LEASES December 1, 1974 By two instruments in writing dated December 1, 1974, Tony Kato and Doris Kato, husband and wife, Landlord, have leased to Vip's Restaurants, Inc., Tenant, the following described property: PARCEL F PARCEL C • A. That portion of Tract 11, of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 10 of plats, page 55, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Tract 11, distant South 0`35' West 228 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89'52' East parallel with the North line of said Tract 11, a distance of 185 feet, more or less, to the West line of the East 450.86 feet of said Tract 11; thence South 0''08' East along said West line 260 feet, more or less, to the Northerly line of Primary State Highway No. 1, R.E. as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5473599; thence North 70`32' 27" West clong sei.d Northerly line 198.57 feet, more or less, to the West line of said Tract 11; thence North 0`35' East 194.22 feet to the point of beginning. SUBJECT to an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over the West 25 feet thereof. B. That portion of Tract 11, of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 10 of plats, page 55, records of king County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner. of said Tract 11; thence South 0'35' West along the 'West line of. said Tract 11, a distance of 228 feet; thence North 89'52' East parallel with the North line of said Tract 11 a distance of 185 feet, more or less, ,to the._West line of the East 450.86 feet of said Tract 11; thence North 0`08' West along said West line. 228 feet to the North line of said Tract 11; thence South 89'52' West 181.79 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER with an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over that portion of the West 25 feet of said Tract 11, lying South of the above - described property and, lying North of Primary State Highway No. 1 R. E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL D VIP'S RESTAURANT DESCRIPTION: BUSH, ROD & HITCHINGS, P. S., Inc. 8813H ALH 8 -31 -72 THAT PORTION OF TRACT 35 OF BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 25 FEET. OF AN UNPLATTED STRIP LYING EAST OF SAID TRACT 35 AND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED FROM TONY S. KATO AND DORIS M. KATO, HIS WIFE, TO RESTAURANT. INDUSTRIES,, INC. AND RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7208030148, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY AS CONDEMNED IN KING. COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 600726; THENCE NORTH 65°16'34" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 163.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 65°16'34" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 206.81 FEET AND NORTH 23 °10'18" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 39.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 24 °43'26" EAST 50.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 °03'51" EAST 60.03 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 130 FEET DISTANT FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH. 65 °16'34" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 157.88 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 24 °43'26" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 24043'26" WEST 130.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE ABOVE TRACT'AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 24 °43'26" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65°16'34" EAST 14.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24 °43'26" WEST 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE .HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 65 °16'34" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 14.00 FEET TO BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO A NON EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED MAIN TRACT LYING WITHIN 30 FEET, AS MEASURED.. AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF. SUPPORTING DRAWINGS FOR TOTAL DEVELOPMENT OF SITE • SCHEMATIC MODEL OF MOTEL DEVELOPMENT 7 1 • . . 4 ••••.,••" • ; : 4:• • • ••••• • 1 . • .4 , .. .. ...• ! .. .' , .. ,,, , . . .. • . -. •••• -...N4?:. • • t -..:. 1.1-:4••• ,. -..ti 1.*, .,:•:. vs:........*,-...f.:;,'.:...-...;•.; ;.,;•i;•,•,,..Zr'. s• -.. •,., • • . Pi' ' " . • ".. • . ' 1 .." • . . , 4 .. $. .. , t:. .., "f , , .. ', • ,... ..• .• .... . • ',.; •:,'„ f.,:$ 2 ..7.... ....,' :,.....:::••'..N; •.; .•;'• • 1 , . . • • • • .. t .1.' • ... ..• .$*!., *....4:,',•;,4.t4-,...1.■ -4;z:•;." .•••••,; • ../. .,,..1.,•:;;;•-'1!•.•;.;:!.:.(,...•,::.):..t..........!* 1'.. ',...'.!: ',.'.!.', - !..... ..;:. :. !, $ ••• •'• : '. .: :'.1',.-:1•• ... - . .. , • ..' '..: . ••• • • •fh• . . : ' • 1 • . ' . . .l. ••••• ,:, ''::'•••.I. • •■•.!,.> V. ••$•• $••,••• 1,..; •;:"■•';••••...;•.'1••••• 1***11.!. 1- ...t....... I '$•:* 1 *-- • ' (•• ;•.% '.; t;',.. •,•:,,:• • ;,:'•:, 1^.•$*; -..i' - $ r.........r. - s' .b T...-1,....' • ...... . .. .. ....„. , .., :... .•;,, . .: .7.,.. . • .1,, -7. ...,...i. • ,..., - .. ,• • • • . '.• ,:•,■0,• ,.• •.”1; jk ' ,. 1...-to,.•,..t':,."1•.i: A ; .7. (...; r'.....'.......*.z.:1 i .',' s'.(' ' )1" .*.: -'1••-..' ....1... '.' p,".... • • - •• • •-• •.:1••• : -. -:*. 1:: ...1.2#'11 :;r•-• . '".-.7i ' 11 • i• , . . • " ...... _ • .. ;-,:i.„, ..-;•;.-• ...,:i .. .1.• •,..4-;:.: .41".i,V!::'!.•.1,..• .::.I.,i,',..,i'.7■••,.0.%.•;:...*■$..::..:;„4.• ie..41•.,.....•'",. • fti':'• ••it'.... "..s.. G',.........:P.' e ..V.11) . ■:' i. " ''' - ... .1.. ••• ' e':' 1:... A .. '‘.. ..v '..... • :.'..,.•• I. .; ... -4.4• . . . - t' ol '..= • • ..", ;',..; 1•;..■ '•;... ;•;i••,:,;:-..•.....:. ..".;i4'.".::+‘ m!.... •.';',i'......•.:-.•;t:0,1•.:::, el• '‘I..i1:,,e:.., • ......r :7 ."... • I.:, .',••••••■•.4,..-1...P.".111': 41 ..." '. L.,■.-... .-• • •:•!•*.- -.• .• :` ,--.• • • • ;• V. :•,:t ': , * .' ; ...: . • ■• . . .. .-. • .. • ..' ,. ••• •• •: • •!. -- ' '... .1":,.. :::,. '•, i ; '.. '•.:''sc'.'`,1.:'-;:-4 i .1\ :1 ••.V--•';'• ' :i ::1•-•': .,...` :.. . ..r•I ' ,ri.. • ..i.. • • — . `...± '..I. '1 •: 7-•... • r.....- ..— • $ • • : tt ' •• . L, .t .T•. -.1:'. , ' . . • ','-....' . - -,!--4;;.•"- ••:•.: . .•■ •. .-.•..:0;•-.•.:,.'‘. : :,...7 :.• 4 ..; -• :i;!:c)1.; .t:,. -,. .;........?.i:?- ....; .;‘..,.t-,;s ;.:t":,....:..'!..:•;.(,.../!....,.:••.iA:. . ii.lC. " :..i:'. ; ;;.,.5,.,. ,:-';',. ■ ::, : , ... . . 1i..1''. ,!.. ..f..*,. '..',7-.‘• 4...i1.''.t'•. ;..'.''•..:;... :; .:4'41'.1, • •• 1•:AJ:Ik4;.!.:1.1•...41..2.. •';'‘, .‘.,...::.•‘-;..',,,:'.4...... : .:• ., :.:,',.I.t.s,!- . 'P...1e:t4::.!...."...-•:. ::" : ;;-4-,.11,"• .'.. .. •••• . • i- .. 71.k•7 'f v 0, a1 t/^ t :'I A %,.', :•:.. .'..• . .....-:.1:• .:•:•:■,•' . ' :• .i••••- •. •:::• 1". • : .■ .2 ..:....-'.i..:.‘..f .... .. .!....' ..7 ': i : : ; ........,?. i ...-,... 1, .*.-4..,..1• .. •• . ;..• , -. . ..,:' . •. • , .• '• :• - •.• ---.. :•. ••••• -:, ', .• . ••• - ‘..... ' ••••••..! . - % • . - !: . : • .•.. •: , a' • • ii. • • 1 • .• . ‘ • . • . , .... :. ..4. , , , .:,..? „.-.. .... fo.••••••• :h....". • , .. ,..... 3 %-... -.0 .• ,... `•. • • . 1 ,-.. , , .. ; , .. . . ..q. . • . .. .... '. .. -... • ' ... . . • ..."-. :':•'.... • 1......*. . 1 • • ggSalg 4 it "r4r.1 itt[ 414. ket \ie fetr L ifif4 " lik,1 /01iitliqiiITNAIIMI,Iti.1 stk. 61 ir r wW7 •■•.. it."41Ng'"141111 112' '111,11110,. gligigt1 P1411N HINic SANtlig 40. • , • .•• . 1,• • •• a' .0 .11, • •••• 1: `1•; • 1;,•■• p..; ••..1.% '•!'1•144 • • ; '4';6 •• • • FRONT ELEVATION OF MOTEL • • _0. . . . . ... . . - ; 7 --.-• ' 7 —•'''''' : — ''"'" .-. ' / • .... • -- ••.1 ' • .'/' '• • ' •. •."'. 4' '.' • ; .• • ? ••1 '. • r.,:-•"' 'i '`• " r''.''''':•.11• ..1 • •: %. 't.:2•• r..0:::.r4....,.. . • . • . • : •• - •• • . , i • ... "A.%...4,.. .....-z:•.ti: .;st,. ,.,...• I . 4,' • !'. • ' . •T'. • 4 4 ' "1/4. •• ..t . ••••••••• - • •••• .t•••• • '.'' .4.7%, :•..:1:;ift.r •tli" •-•;-•'•..,..*:.' ." ,.. .01 .t; .•••::.:. .• .. 3 1. •.i. •:: • • •;. - . - • • ....• • .., - .1.!!..1.:,!. sl,....!, -.4,-.........7.-;s. :. I •*:•:. ': ''' ..... . ... . • :%': ; . "-• ' :: .. 1• ..• ' ' „,1. • , . fi', ., • .. . •'.'' 1 •-• •.' i •...i : • %;;. .-... • :.: 1 . ..v?...i"....7. ', ..-..„.1 '11.1.1.4..4 ..::::*41::. '.•.e. ' • /' „,.`i.. • .•1".T !...;.*: ...;,1..it.•;'41',• :tr: Ig' • • ■••• 1 •••• ••'..'. ; • t ••••• ; fi.:. • ....; • ...' .... • • ' ....!'-,: ',..-- •••I'i t ..' ...:.1:1.." .. . ,t. • ,,,- . !, . • ,.: :41 !..:•. ' • - i :-.-;.. r :::' - • .1n .' • : t at 0' ; • .: • . •.. :. t.. -..!.0'....i...i.••!..9?.t • c" L!..:•T....: . k.. '...., i:. , • .: - - -- ..- •:,...:ii ''.'....- *.-'-';,. • .... . ..- - 4.:-.. ' ;..;.: .•;••• • -.,.. • . . . • • .2 :...,r ..-: . ; .. -'1,-•'.....- ' 1 ...''t••:.1- ; ' ...-. : • ' . :•' ' -..- . •#I ; '''• ''.'.. f••■,-:".7.. 4,.: —4:I': . .? ,- ' • • C • .. ..- ' . 1.)1:!.1.:.i...1.: .:: . : 1:. ,2:....:r.:......:.L.7::;..ti. :,4.tti.Iv;:........it.i ...71.:',.:.....„.!..:.",...........:;i. ....',..:'..1... 1. ''.v. 1, ...1 ." ...-#1 . '0... .t..g...i t... ..,:.'....;:: -i...`.. ,i?.:......Iii.'l..............„-.., :. : f ..0,.: i...;.r..... '.:..'!....:.:.- ./....1.; ' :11 ' .... I • '.. !C.. ' . '.e, - ..I. '04.. ... .. ... ! : ; . ' . '.. •.-, ',..;r...: 1 ':. .4 4 • • ..• . V. . .. • ' • • ) • • ••_, 1,;$ 0.. .....1-.,...•.1. , .• ' 1.'•-•,"!''''11:1,..., .4:• .. ... • • .; !;.•i ' 4 ...,.• , •-ii . ':, • i:;'.' , 1.:•'‘:*•,It‘ 4...1.11"...r • '": '•;•1•::: .4...14 •:.,.:'; 1"..1.....1,.‘, ! t • ..:-.....- ...''. . - 4: • .; ! i •; .t.....'". .4,-, '-..r:.■ .. ...'.1 1"....-.1 • -''. •.t •.. : ...I ••••••... ';• • • • ; -, 9,/ ..r''. • • • MOTOR INN intr. graailfflatirraMr.m. 1111111111 r, n.••■■ v • : • , 4 •.'.•'" • . . . .4 1 1 • 1.. '••,/••• 0. : • tVoni t.. FRONT ELEVATION OF MOTEL SHOWING SIGNAGE ‘' 41' rt'•• • .*;Y. • •i • • • • • 41 • '41...••;•1.•'? ■■• 40... , I • 11..on*Ale 4......••••■••••■•••••••••••• eoa.I.-....•;re■■•••••••••••• all1111011h.....■••••■••• • -■• „..........._\_,.. ‘. \ __.......,„ \ \ s , • __„....._. -, ., \ \% , \ N., 4. * \ ..• - - • .. - - - - ...-- - N N... .:_. ---.... AW•\\"' - . t k.\\ • ,,, X \ \ % . \ % \ t \ I, 1 t ■ \ \ \ \ \ ■ \,,, \ ■ ._. \ ••".... ... •• . .. N SITE PLAN • N. \ N .1 .... N. \ tl -••• ---- -. . ... ,•,,, 1 • • • /7/7.2c11(. • ui t,: LJ. I��:l i; ii .u:�„ML'Fwtn.,+,I+wata.'4+r�►W • ..i. {- w�.jK �y.�. er.r7 • ' i6�; �S",` t*eil�u�31an�4j`" SECTION THRU SITE AT' ,,INE 3 L. pl(:''44 / 7 /7rte. ''r:"';V•, '!'� - tii "'!7�•.Y:��1�.1'. ,:t�r:1•> ��it:1d'rd- �..,u.ct +: '}1,�ftipr. Fy.t•:4i'!°: I, :.�:`��:.`.r.'L::b;t {GY,';'C. '7r.}�� Y' 13 tt. {�. 21 Zi l4� cO<` MOiIOVIk"1:610413.0:; • • ..•w.i:r- ...Nw�f+�narw• �.���•YrnA �r....v•r.ry.' 1� ! .. _......�.�.......w.......... .... _.. . •.�^ -+1• .• .•'+{ •.TS.Q.'SZz • .i• • ••••■ • • ■ouvAaTr sY. NV1a . Uboz; : T tcmAz. • • •, • • '•,11814;43:41.1);;;; 1.44.'K" I A• :! •41•Ali :41/ .• • • •r,z$, • -;44. R.--..4.,vs44“8.t.v.P•34Tha,tto.r.h.n.+40,4•44 1 1 4 IJ . .1 I I: ..., ...I.P..4.:1,4i44..I....504,"44,4■544.."4.10,/,II/71 81. oil r IV t'• sI -1.. l• z+ , 0 ( .. 1 .s t. ii, ... ?; ., , 'MOTEL FLOOR PLAN OF TYPICAL ROOMS r.1.4:47.4,4;44,K0,,Shwit. , EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 5 CITY OF TUKWILA APPLICATION FOR WAIVER From the Provisions of Resolution Number 489 (Please type or print) Date of Application: March 4,1977 Name of Applicant: Bob L. Smith. President. Vip's Restaurants,Inc. Mailing Address: 250 Liberty St.S.E. - P.O. Box 2508 City: Salem ,Oregon Zip: 97308 Ownership Interest in Property: Owner Phone: (503)585 -6221 Legal Description of Property Affected: SEE ATTACHED. General Location of Property: 5700 South Center Blvd. (Tukwila Interchange) 1. State specifically the action in Resolution No. 489, Section 4 to which you are requesting a waiver: A,B, & D -1 . Describe specifically the action you are proposing, including dimensional infor- mation about the development, site maps, etc., if available: Proposal for .a 113 Room Motel and expanding the existing Vip's Restaurant to seat 150, plus a Lounge and Banquet Room. See drawings. 3. What is your justification for your request: (Please refer to items 1 -4 on the cover sheet and respond to them.) The site_ is a visual mess. The existing Rasta »rant needs expansion and remodeling. The expansion is planned to serve a Motel_ The owners _of Vip's have always planned to develop a Motel-Restaurant- _Service Station comply. This .total development plan was based on purchasing the State surplus property adjacent to the Restaurant. This property was purchased last year. (attach additional sheet, if necessary) 4. What other factual evidence is relevant to your request for waiver (such as exist- ing development in the vicinity of your property, soils and geologic investiga- tions, etC.): We are in the process of retaining a soils engineering firm to make a complete investigation of the site. This information should be completed in time for the April Planning Commission meeting. (Attach any other information available which substantiates your request) (OwnerT (for office use only) Date Received: )Gtatictt, t111 ./ I Received by: Cy�,�,,tati Date scheduled before City Council: Action of City Council: Date of City Council Action: • s Parcel A 15,000 U4, I-I- cel B RMH 90,954 SF Parcel C (F; 41,496 SF Parcel E Parcel F 42,087 SF C NORTH PARCEL LOCATION MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A CA kt4,..,)1 UI WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504 R E A L E S T A T E C O N T R A C T 1 .0 IN THE MATTER OF SR 5, South 178th St. to South 126th St. (NI THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this // day of �,iCz �• u / 0 1976, between STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, reinafter Ocalled the "seller" and V.I.P.'S RESTAURANTS, INC., an Oregon corporation, .0 hereinafter called the "purchaser" N • WITNESSETH: That the seller agrees to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase from the seller the following described real estate in King County, State of Washington: That portion of Tract 35, Brookvale Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 47, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at a point opposite Highway Engineer's Station (here - inafter referred to as H.E.S.) P.C.(1 -RE) 158 +93.3 on the 1 -RE Line of State Highway Route 5 (PSH No. 1), South 178th St. to South 126th St., and 70 feet northeasterly therefrom; thence northeast- erly 40 feet to a point opposite said H.E.S. P.C.(1 -RE) 158 +93.3 and 110 feet northeasterly therefrom; thence North 62 °00' West 103 feet, more or less, to intersect a line drawn parallel with and 140 feet southeasterly, when measured at right angles and /or radially, from the Mac Road center line survey of said Highway; thence north- easterly and northerly, along said parallel line, to the north line of said Tract; thence west, along said north line, to intersect a line drawn parallel with and 70 feet northeasterly, when measured at right angles and /or radially, from said Mac Road center line survey; thence southeasterly, southerly and southwesterly, along said parallel line, to a point 85 feet northeasterly, when measured at right angles, from the 1 -RE Line of said Highway; thence south- easterly in a straight line to the point of beginning. The purchaser herein, its successors or assigns, shall have no right of ingress and egress to, from and between said highway, and the lands herein described nor shall the purchaser herein, its successors or assigns, be entitled to compensation for any loss of light, view and air occasioned by the location, construction, maintenance or operation of said highway. PHONE 926 -3320 JACKSON & PROCHNAU I N C O R P O R A T E D CONSULTING FOREST ENGINEERS LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 177 ALBANY, OREGON 97321 January 17, 1974 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL B LEGAL DESCRIETION RESTAURANT INDUSTRIES INC. PORTION SECTION 23, T23N, R4E, W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON That portion of Tract 35 of Brookvale Garden Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats,_ on page records of King County, Washington, and of the unplatted strip of land adjoining on the East, lying between the East line of said Tract 35 ( said East line being also the East line of the Southwest k of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. ) and the West line of the Interurban Addition as per plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, on Page 55, records of said County, described as ,a whole as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West line of said Interurban Addition with the Northerly line of Primary State Highway No. 1 RE as described in Parcel "A" in King County Superior Court Cause No. 600726; thence along said Northerly line, N65 °16'34" W 27.33 feet; thence, parallel with said West line of the Interurban Addition, N 0 °53'34" E 147.58 feet; thence parallel with the Northerly line of said Highway No. 1 RE, N 65 °16'34" W 103.37 feet; thence N 24 °43'26" E 2.00 feet; thence parallel with theNortherly line of said Highway No. 1 RE, N 65 °16'34" W 149.13 feet; thence S 76 °03'51" W 75.24 feet; thence S 24 °43'26" W 50.41 feet to a concrete highway R/W monument; thence N 64 °25'14" W 103.03 feet to a con- crete highway R/W monument; thence along a 226.41 foot radius curve to the left, the long chord of which bears N 2 °03'30" W.173.97 feet to a steel rebar; thence S 89° 50'42" E 450.869 feet to a steel rebar; thence along the West line of said Interurban Addition, S 0 °53'34" W 419.68 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 2.088 acres, more or less. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL F and PARCEL C MEMORANDUM OF LEASES December 1, 1974 By two instruments in writing dated December 1, 1974, Tony Kato and Doris Kato, husband and wife, Landlord, have leased to Vip's Restaurants, Inc., Tenant, the following described property: PARCEL F PARCEL C A. That portion of Tract 11, of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 10 of .plats, page 55, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Tract 11, distant South 0'35' West 228 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 89'52' East parallel with the North line of said Tract 11,,a distance.of 185 feet, more or less, to the West line of the East 450.86 feet of said Tract 11; thence South 0`08' East along said West line 260 feet, more or less, to the Northerly line of Primary State Highway No. 1, R.E. as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5473599; thence North 70`32' 27" West along sold Northerly line 198.57 feet, more or less, to the West line of said Tract 11; thence North 0`35' East 194.22 feet to the point of beginning. SUBJECT to an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over the West 25 feet thereof. B. That portion of Tract 11, of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 10 of plats, page 55, record's of king County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract 11; thence South 0`35' West along the West line of said Tract 11, a distance of 228 feet; thence North 89'52' East parallel with the North line of said Tract 11 a distance of 185 feet, more or less, to the West line of the East 450.86 feet of said Tract 11; thence North 0`08' West along said West line 228 feet to the North line of said Tract 11; thence South 89 '52' West 181.79 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER with an easement for ingress,, egress and utilities over that portion of the West 25 feet of said Tract 11, lying South of the above - described property and lying North of Primary State Highway No. 1 R. E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL D VIP'S RESTAURANT DESCRIPTION: BUSH, ROEO & HITCH /NGS, P. S., Inc. 8813H ALH 8 -31 -72 THAT PORTION OF TRACT 35 OF BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF AN UNPLATTED STRIP LYING EAST OF SAID TRACT 35 AND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED FROM TONY S. KATO AND DORIS M. KATO, HIS WIFE, TO RESTAURANT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 720803.0148, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY COURT CAUSE NO. 600726; THENCE NORTH 65 °16'34" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 163.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 65 °16'34" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 206.81 FEET AND NORTH 23 °10'18" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 39.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 24 °43'26" EAST 50.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 °03'51" EAST 60.03 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 130 FEET DISTANT FROM SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 65 °16'34" EAST. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 157.88 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 24 °43'26" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 24043'26" WEST 130.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF.BGINNING, TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF THE ABOVE TRACT'AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 24 °43'26" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 °16'34" EAST 14.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24 °43'26" WEST • 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 65 °16'34" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 14.00 FEET TO BEGINNING, • SUBJECT TO A NON EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED MAIN TRACT LYING WITHIN 30 FEET, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF.. • • • SUPPORTING DRAWINGS FOR TOTAL DEVELOPMENT OF SITE SCHEMATIC MODEL OF MOTEL DEVELOPMENT ti • ;;. • • •' t•t".*•. :•. • • •- • 11111 I 111 lia1111111111111 lifilliti111111101,11 I I • • p ,•• .1 ••• ;•• •,. , , 1, 116.777.7.".n _ OMNI* 1111101111111nume.6 mon 16, • . I ',!*6..qi;;:;:r.fr, I.Pr's`i. I :;I ,I 't` t :•1 • • --t.•• • •••• • • • mrt,,,rt! na I 1111NOMINIallail .);•ltori•v[•N. . •, . . • *•.•■• .• • • ... 2: . •• .•• ;Aril, • ti •:,..::••••;•••••• itcomiz `•:•./At • i■I;;;-• , • - FRONT ELEVATION OF MOTEL. _.'• :•1 • •i .r.i•j . /ti ,..: '..••r ;��1':. of. alit fs :/. • •••..ty7•• :r_vF, • . • '•:•4: *r':••► :i :.Lr ::.�,: �'1 •'.iri • • N. (: �.�" Js•''ta . :: •'�'::fa -�. ^.w:i.1 +.7 \ri`.{' Laj• t,;'�• '•3: ^....: �.. • .'.:.:�q:i... Y• . f*•. • • . •••1 v 4 111 E IM MIME 1■111 MEM 1.1.. • -1.4.1T4 ti ■••411Mil tiRIA ` 11 1I "ma • ■MIMI MIIIMf p FRONT ELEVATION OF-MOTEL SHOWING SIGNAGE • • • -: • of :.- .%Aar• • ________ __ -- _ _ 44. \\V\‘, \\*\ ■.117 \ \‘ \ \ \\ \\ \\\\\ / SITE PLAN * 49i4.■••• .1.44111■11...4ir; ...0,.,...4•*?.k.koi4,44.‘.0....4//6.1.4,1•..••••••••1; • .104,41«. • •;" • • ...14.X■rakali.411161.16Zi '''jranStaia/MCSargainSZOWOISSIEM: ' . • ii.y.u..tt) . • ' • t'S r'■'• • %It - . . , . . • 2:123i1=1276211=602,64SAM. • • 1' A • • 1 t..-.:•;-.",.t t% . 't-i;,.....,1 • t . '• t I.. ... t!..- 4: •• 0.. It .- '.4. - ,i ,tt:••4ft. . " ..'- t i • t • t • t . t. t "...;• '-t '; ,! , ..:r.....,. 4.. , ' .•t '.4 .-. ' - . • , ''....i , ". .. • ......t."4. ...... '::'..t,..1,;;...... ".. 11 : ... , .::;'-..",.:-;:, . • • ''' t i;: 'i.'1..:...:t. ;:,,........i...ti, • t ...■4.''''`. • / /7/7A 21//s ZI S riIH,i : AIOIZDS �".V'l��71.j f�+ IRTV17�.;EY'7D1P�.7aG - 1RAM�ZS�rx�ow :r�"s'�"a'a`vr�""'�'"� - ._` �w6• ,.... .. , .�............ ..... .... ..... ., , • ,-. Vf RICOMETICIMI • • 1,11Z4C4•: •• PA' 14:41.••■••■4,:iiiii•Mt..yr4Gieli4litilli. • • • 1 . . . . I • ' 4• • I • I • • • ‘. / • • , 1 . • • I f:.1etrit, • ..;■• 7."7:- • . . . ; • • • • I . • • . • • . :••• • . . • • • . • • • : • . I ' • •• P . • • ; . . . •10TET,• p,L0 R pLAN ELEVATIOIN . • . , , . 225..6 FT.:' • 1-r-d LL •• .• . 7,17 _ -.» _ = in =MINI P1111111111 MOTEL FLOOR PLAN OF TYPICAL ROOMS • o • EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS auaaa RpCi(Dmy) rt , i1 \.4 � J � • i . , . RECEIPT Date // 1977 6318 Received From Vi S Address 42,57) .c,,,- /, j 14-LA — _ _Z6 Dollars $ SVe !' For ,.....,4--A u_s-, LSD, __CZ__ _ u - c-c-r� '�` d , da • ACCOUNT . � I/ HOW PAIDY ' _ /7 l� (��(// •'-� ,I �I ('i.�(J� // `` =r�"�n. F,npT. CF ACCOUNT CASH By AMT. PAID CHECK gALANCE ORDER auaaa RpCi(Dmy) PROPOSED MOTEL - TUKWILA SITE 1. Parking and entrance on (uphill) side of building similar to City Hall and Xerox Buildings. 2. Uphill entrance would be less conflict with restaurant and mini -mart traffic. 3. Parking for motel does not use restaurant parking lot. 4. Parking lot is screened by existing trees. 5. Entrance and exit on east side for better traffic movement because of increased traffic created by motel. 6. Building shortened - doesn't interfere with view from apartment. 7. No excavation material to be removed from site. 8. Lower, smaller building creates less negative enviromnental impact. NEW PLAN OLD PLAN USE Motel Motel HEIGHT 45 feet 47 feet WIDTH 60 feet 60 feet LENGTH 340 feet 470 feet LOCATION ON LOT 85 foot contour 100 foot contour SQ. FT. (approx.) 18,440 33, 350 # OF ROOMS 126 113 # OF PARKING STALLS 134 113 MATERIALS Stucco, wood, tile Stucco, wood, tile • SERVICES, VIPS RESTAURANT AND MOTEL TUKWILA, WASHINGTO 6. Surface Water When completed, the site will generate approximately 10.8 cfs of water during the peak 10 years storm. as calculated by the Mechanical Engineers. The storm water will leave the site and Freeway drainage system at the southwest edge of the site southeast edge'of the site (see Figure 1). Presently this ditch canal that drains the lower edge of the property at the hill and into a 12" pipe as shown at B. The existing flow is below +1 cfs,, assuming that the water is drained from only. storm design join and the the is an open top of the in this ditch the lawn area The new plantings and terraced areas will retain some of the runoff thereby reducing a portion of the 10.8 cfs. Fresh Water The new facility will require approximately 6,500 gallons /day and will require a 2" line. Electrical A 400 KW service will be required to service the new facility with electric heat and lights. Gas Natural gas will be used to heat the water for both the motel -rooms and the pool. ' rocs ,4 . re fil-- See- n PROJECT DESCRIPTION;y• i. • :o l This ;report presents;a traffic analysis for the expansion of the VIP's Restaurant located i'n Tukwila on Southcenter Boulevard northeast of the • << • intersection of Inte"rsta,te5 (I -5) and Interstate 405 (I -405). See Figure 1. The existing 3,100 square•;foot restaurant is adjacent to a combination ARCO service statioriand•convenience style grocery store. This•is the only commercial development along the'north side of Southcenter Boulevard. VIP's. Restaurants, Inc. controls a five acre site on which they propose • to enlarge the existing restaurant and build a 113 unit motel. Figure 2 shows the site plan. The existing restaurant•will be expanded by 3,600 square feet to include additional dining space, a lounge and banquet facilities. The motel will have moderately priced rooms and will use the expanded freestanding restaurant for support food services. It will be nestled against the hill behind and east of the existing restaurant. There are no plans for offices or retail shops to be incorporated into the motel building. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the motel and restaurant will be constructed by mid 1978 and will reach its maximum potential by 1980. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITTONS Traffic Volumes Traffic counts -made at VIP's and along adjacent streets: during May were combined with counts made by the Washington State Department of Highways and the results are shown on Figure 3. They indicate that approximately 1,900 vehicle trips.'in and out are attracted to the restaurant each day. Weekdays are characterized by • peak surges at breakfast, lunch, and dinner. The weekday peak hour traffic demand is about 90 one -way vehicle trips, per hour and occurs sometime within the 11:30 to 1:30 noon rush. These fluctuations are shown on Figure 4. Weekend day and weekday traffic volumes are about equal the weekend day. Brunch peak is smaller but of longer duration than the weekday lunch peak. This particular restaurant has unusually high turnover per. table (two to three times during the peak lunch period) which converts directly to higher than average traffic volumes. As a comparison, • POINT 5600 GRAHAr4 �� UPLAND BRIGHTON y 6300 `t - 5 OTHELLO ST • Atlantic City Pork DUNLAP 5 HENOERSON ST RAINIER ♦. KENNY ALE COLEMAN POINT BRYN MAWR ALLENTOWN S Z4 ST N 8 ST S[24 ST ,,j4 -1 S IYWAY P RK S 31 ST �f7il7>d1E1 .'UN Al EL :.. THE TRANSPO GROUP FIGURE 1 VICINITY 1AP 1 'r- - - - - - - J • • r�i,,,Ii. t 3 1 / \ • _Lm., Js LI 1 I \ _ 6 s, Js7 e- -- -N„� --1 f ---- -'� - ` , .. -331 ... \�‘ • ' --- - - -- - - - - -- ' r TUKWILA PARKWAY C O O N O 4O O O N VEHICLE,,TRIPS O N W z H THE TRANSPO GROUP (7, cc.J :2 E- 4- F-flUZLL T F R,L VOL(' U P- p fl0 nJ VIP's RESTAURANT EXPANSION _) (:: this VIPs restaurant generates about three times asmuch traffic as the average high "turnover sit down restaurant. Traffic counts could not be made at the adjacehtiARCO service station - grocery, but :counts at other similar service stations i'nditate that 800 to 1,000 trips are generated per station per day. Observations at the service station ind.icate.that on -site traffic varies proportionally with traffic volume on•Southcenter Boulevard. Thus the peak houriademand occurs between 4 PM and 6 PM of the evening peak period. All traffic to and from the restaurant tr.avels,lalOg Southcenter Boulevard which.carries approximately 25,000.vehicl;es per weekday in both directions. The peak traffic volume is 2,400:vehicles= per hour and occurs during.the 4PM to 6PM evening peak period. Southcenter. ::.Boulevard is a five lane major arterial with two through lanes.in`eadhdirection and a .center left turn lane that provides protection for :,cacsturning in and out'' of the restaurant -gas station and Macadam Road. Southcenter Boulevard, in combination with the "S" Line Bridge, is the primary link between the Southcenter- Andover Industrial Park and I -5 on and ofir ;ramps to the. north and I -405 westbound off ramps. The "S" Line Bridge ; car -.ries about 30,000 vehicles per day. The only visible congestion in the area occurs• -along the "S" Line Bridge during peak surges of shopping center demand. During the Christams season, there are also backups of traffic on Southcenter:Boul•evard caused by traffic traveling toward the regional shopping center. :This eo.ngestion and delay is minimized because the fully actuated signals at each-tend of the bridge are well designed and timed for snappy operation. Traffic. Distribution Trafficicounts: and on-site observations indicate`:that about 70 percent of the daily: traffic .is attracted :. from east of the sitet . The majority (65 ;or 70.percen,t) ,of: the traffic from the east;traveTs via the "S Line - Bridge from the :Southcenter= Andover:Industr ial'Parkarea.or from the '' .Southcenter;Parkway'exit from northbound I -5. The : =remaiining 30 percent of the traffic. comes. from the west from S.154th Street, the southbound off ramp' from 1-5 and the westbound off .ramp from I -405. ,During lunch about 90 percent of the restaurant traffic appears to be generated out of the South Center - Andover Industrial Park area. The bulk of the-residual 10 percent is generated out of Renton, Burien and SeaTac Airport. 1 Traffic accesses the restaurant parking lot using one of the three primary travel patterns shown on Figure 5. Approximately 40 percent use the east entrance and travel on the access road behind the ARCO station. Half the traffic uses the west entrance between the ARCO Station and VIP's The remaining 10 percent use the east entrance but pass through the ARCO station by the gas pumps. Travel through the gas station usually takes • place during mid - morning and mid- afternoon and late evening when the gas;' station is least busy. f:. i The east driveway is the only exit for:traffic traveling eastbound on Southcenter Boulevard, and it was observed that two to three cars exit.; for each car that enters. This direction split is reversed:at the, west driveway (one outbound for every two to three inbound). } , Pedestrian Activity There was no pedestrian or bicycle activity observed during any of the on -site investigations. This is primarily due to the long distances between VIPs and nearby destinations as well as the lack of sidewalks and wide shoulders along the heavily traveled arterials. Parking There are 52 marked parking stalls that surround the restaurant. • During lunch, these spaces are almost always full and the overflow of 10 to 15 cars park in front of the restaurant in unmarked spaces and along the north side of the service road to the rear of the restaurant. Six to eight of the employees park their cars'to the west of the restaurant outside the parking lot. $; Programmed, Street Improvements' The only near term street improvement affecting the VIP expansion4w.illF be the widening of Southcenter Boulevard from five to six l`anest.', TheAs' / widening w.1.1 allow for three lanes eastbound; two lanes wetstbound.,__._ center left turn lane. Most of the right -of -way needed for; widening > >w'I' come from along the north side' (VIP sideflof the boulevard I As paved s dewalk, is also planned as part of the�widenin ro•ect and will a o p p g p �u pass in�front of VIPs. A sketch of the roadway is shown in Figure 5. -4 M 0 0 •;-4 : : z PROPOSED STREET WIDENING SOUTHCENTER BLVD. ADDED LANE J 0 • • • . is IMPACT OF THE PROJECT Trip Generation The total daily.volume for all.activities),onthe site is estimated to be 4,750 vehicle•trips in and out of the. site. i Peak traffic demands will occur at noon and during the normal PM peakperiod and will be 400 vehicles per hour and 350 vehicles per hour'respecti:vely. In contrast' to today's - erratically peaked, tra,ffic,v:olumes, traffic volumes will be more uniform. This.is:because the` three. traffic generators (the expanded restaurant, the motel, andi;the,Arco Station), peak at different times of the day and consequently complement each other. :rather than compounding peak hour surges of traffic. This is illustrated by Figure 6 which'shows that the motel generated traffic volumes are low duringithe midday while the restaurant volumes are at their peak. Similarly, during the mid - morning and late- afternoon when restaurant volumes are low, motel volumes reach their peak. The service station traffic volumes fluctuate with the volumes west- bound on Southcenter Boulevard during noon and evening rush hour. The trip generation rate used to estimate daily traffic volumes to and from the'expanded restaurant 15 ,375 trips per 1,000.square feet. While this trip generation rate is about half as l,arge!as the.rate observed at the existing restaurant, the total daily volume will increase twenty -five percent_ over today's volume. . The reduction of the trip generation rate is•substantiated by studies made by the Institute .of Traffic Engineers. i(iPTE)..'which show that the trip generation rate decreases. as the size. of ithe- restaurant ;increases. This is because the smaller restaurant: has a, hfighm.occupan,cyAuiring off peak periods. This principle is illustrated on :rijgure' 7,1,wh.ich, ishows ithat the larger restaurant is better able to meet peak: demandsA but,has a. ;barge =amount of unused space during off peak periods. Whi 1 e' dai ly' tri p, generatiron' r:'ates� at }the;?expanded restaurant will be • lower than at the existing restaurant,i ;i ti Si s expected:ithat the noon hour trip rate of 60 trips per. 1,000. square feet ?:Willi Tema:intabout the same. With the addition of the! l ounge, i t is reasoriabl e} ,.to expect that the early evening (5 -6 PM) trip. rates.wi,ll be higher.,than today's volumes. m cn � o GI no 0 c "fl m M cn . co > < - 1 : . D Z N D — z 0 --1 Z 400 360 3 2.0..., 280 0 240 m 200 160 120 80 40 1 TOTAL 1 / 1 VIP's ARCO • _ _ _ _ _ _ 45- MOTEL 12M 6A 12N 6P 12M TIME • O m 400 380 340 320 280 240 200 160 120 80 40 .400 380 340 320 280 r 240 200 160 120 80 40 • LARGE RESTAURANT CAPACITY //' // /: /, / ,, UNDERUTILIZED// SPACE .f 12M 6A SMALL RESTAURANT CAPACITY �// / UNDERUTILIZED // SPACE/ ' /; / 12M 6A 12N TIME 6P UNMET DEMAND 12M 12N TIME 6P 12M THE �- (!� u'C TRANSPO ?F r /���� $ GROUP E FF C.� �,� `re P 2,47F VIP's RESTAURANT EXPANSION ITE traffic generation studies at motels show an average of 9.5 trips per occupied room per day. This rate includes trips made by employees and service and delivery vehicles as well as guests. Presumably the rate could be substantially lower (two or more trips per room) since many motel guests will be dining at VIP's rather than driving off the site to another restaurant. However, to be conservative, a trip generation rate of 9 trips per occupied room was used, resulting in 1,020 trips per day. This volume represents the traffic conditions when the motel is fully occupied even though most motels experience 10 percent or more vacancy. Surges in motel traffic will coincide with guest check+in and check out during the mid - morning and late- afternoon. The Arco Service Station and convenience store traffic will increase to 1,060 vehicles per day in proportion to increases in the volume of traffic along Southcenter Boulevard. While traffic volume records do not show any traffic increase, development in the Andover Industrial Park and Parkway. Plaza suggest otherwise. Using nearby freeway ramp traffic counts as a guide, volumes along Southcenter Boulevard and to and from the Arco Station will increase about two percent per year. These traffic volume estimates only represent traffic volumes to and from the site. There will be some additional trips made on the site between the motel, restaurant and service station. Most of these trips between the motel, restaurant and convenience store will be made as a pedestrian. The pattern of stopping by the Arco service station on the way to or from the restaurant should continue and will probably increase with the addition of the proposed motel. Trip Distribution Travel patterns for the expanded restaurant and Arco Service Station will remain much the same as today and will maintain strong ties with Southcenter. The bulk of the motel traffic will access from the freeway in spite of its being hard to see the motel from the road and the awkward routing between some of the ramps and the motel. The combination of these access and egress patterns are depicted on Figure 8. It shows 60 percent of the 1980 traffic traveling across the "S" Line Bridge compared with 70 percent of today's site traffic using this bridge. This decrease is a result of the additional motel traffic which approaches from the west on Southcenter Boulevard via the southbound I -5 and eastbound I -405 ramps. • Traffic Analysis Noon and evening peak hour and daily traffic volume estimates are shown on Figure 9. While the noon peak hour volume is the highest hourly volume, the combination of on -site and Southcenter Boulevard volumes during the evening peak hour represents the worst set of traffic conditions and are therefore included as part of this analysis. There may be days when exiting noon hour traffic bound for Southcenter will be delayed while waiting for a gap in the westbound Southcenter Boulevard traffic. If there is a delay, the resulting back up will be no larger than six to eight cars deep which can be easily stored in the exit roadway and parking aisles. During the evening,a similar back up may occur when eastbound vehicles coming to check -in to the motel or have dinner at the restaurant attempt to turn left into the main entrance from Southcenter Boulevard. While the turning movement is much smaller than the noon hour turning volume previously described, the opposing traffic of Southcenter shoppers and employees driving home is much heavier, allowing fewer gaps in traffic. Fortunately, the traffic signal on Southcenter Boulevard at the "S" Line Bridge provides a gap in the traffic stream each time it changes. These gaps occur frequently enough to keep the queue of left turning vehicles (4 to 5 cars maximum) at a level that can be stored in the center left turn lane. The additional volumes generated by the restaurant expansion and the new motel should not result in any noticeable increase in congestion or delay since all intersections have excess capacity. Furthermore, Southcenter Boulevard will be widened, allowing for smoother traffic flow in the east- bound direction. This widening will be especially helpful during the Christmas and other shopping peak periods. Construction Impact There will be additional traffic generated during the construction phase of the project by employees of the contractor, heavy equipment and trucks hauling excavation and building materials. Using other local construction projects as a guide, peaks in construction traffic fall just prior to the normal morning and evening traffic peak periods when construction workers • /7 change shifts. A project of this size would generate no more than 40 vehicle . trips during each of these peak periods. The large amount of excavation required to build the motel will result in a noticeable volume of dump trucks traveling to and from the site. The truck volume is controlled by the rate at which the soil can be excavated and the trucks filled. The maximum truck volume is estimated to be 100 truck trips per day. This volume is spread uniformly over the eight hour work day resulting in about 12 trips in and out each hour. Parking The site plan for the proposed restaurant and motel shows about 130 parking stalls will be added bringing the total to 184 parking spaces. This is 17 more spaces than are required by the City's off - street parking regulations. This 10 percent surplus is available to serve any infrequent surges in demand. It is unlikely that over capacity conditions will occur since accumulation of parking at the motel and restaurant are very compatible. That is, the motel parking demand is least at noon when the restaurant's requirements are highest, and the reverse is true during the late evening when the motel demand is highest. The City requires one parking space for each five seats in the restaurant and one parking space for each hotel room. These requirements are consistent with those used by other cities in the area. A summary of the calculations are shown in the following table. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS Land Use Size Parking Parking Stalls Required Restaurant 268 seats 1 space /5 seats Motel 113 rooms 1 space /room 54 113 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 167 /s/ CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The traffic impact of the proposed expansion of the VIP's restaurant and the new 113 room motel will be minor.' While the total daily volume will almost double, the bulk of this increase occurs at times when Southcenter Boulevard and its tributary freeway ramps and streets have excess capacity. Consequently, the existing street system can easily serve the additional traffic generated by the proposed expansion. The proposed street widening along Southcenter Boulevard will neither help nor hinder access to the site. This is because the lane configuration on the VIP's side of the street will remain essentially the same as today with a center left turn lane and two through lanes westbound. The improvement will, however, help during peak shopping periods. The two primary driveways in and out of the motel and restaurant can meet access and egress demands of the expansion. The main driveway east of the ARCO Service Station should be striped with two lanes outbound and one lane inbound as shown on Figure dl . This may require cutting back one of the landscaped traffic islands in the first row of parking. The outbound lanes should be marked with pavement arrows, accompanied by appropriate signing. The addition of 130 new parking spaces will relieve today's noon -time overflow parking problems. Elimination of double parking and parking in aisles will ensure smooth internal circulation and clear access for emergency vehicles. The new total of 185 parking spaces will exceed parking needs any time of the day or night. The 150 vehicle trips per day associated with construction is less than a five percent addition to existing traffic volumes. Peak volumes will occur during early morning and mid afternoon when workers arrive and leave the job site. While as much as half of this traffic will be heavy trucks, their volumes are too small to result in any appreciable inconvenience to other vehicles.