The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-47 - HANOVER MANAGEMENT - SOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE PHASES II AND IIISOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE PH I, II, III, IV,V, CORPORATE DR N CORPORATE DR S EPIGFD -47 PAUL P. ASHLEY OF COUNSEL THOMAS B. FOSTER LOUIS H. PEPPER DANIEL J. RIVIERA PETER V. GULICK WILLIAM H. ELLIS DAVID W. SANDELL RICHARD E. KEEFE CAMDEN M. HALL MICHAEL E. STANSBURY JEROME D. WHALEN CHARLES P. NOMELLINI ROBERT J. DIERCKS D. DOUGLAS MATSON JOHN T. BLANCHARD CARL J. WEST III MARCO J. MAGNANO, JR. DOUGLAS S. PALMER, JR. JOSEPH M. GAFFNEY March 15., 1978 • c?,274 cat4.4- •Sr- /D( W. V. TANNER (1881.1953) JOHN P. GARVIN (1888-I9721 FOSTER, PEPPER & RIVIERA 4400 SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98154 (2081 447 -4400 RECEIVED O.C.D. CITY OF TUKWILA MAR 1 4. 1978 Mr. Lawrence E. Hard LeSourd, Patten, Fleming, Hartung & Emory 3900 SeaFirst National Bank Building Seattle, Washington 98154 Dear Larry: Hanover Management, Inc./ City of Tukwila-- - Letters of Credit BARRIE L.ALTHOFF MIKE E. BRANDEBERRY FAY L. CHAPMAN PETER 5. EHRLICH MAN GARY E. FLUHRER E. ALLEN JOHN, JR. CATHARINE K. MARTINSON MICHAEL K. MURRAY JONATHAN B. NOLL BARBARA OHNICK ANNE M. REDMAN ARMISTEAD P. ROOD JUDITH M. RUNSTAO RICHARD M. SHUTE V. RAFAEL STONE As discussed, here are revised drafts of the two letters of credit, together with a side letter relating thereto. Our client is anxious to have the letters of credit issued today if possible, since a necessary building permit will not be issued until the letters of credit have been furnished. Accordingly, in view of the time. element I am taking the liber- ty of sending drafts to Kgell Stoknes at the City of Tukwila and Pamela Ackley -Bell at the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce for their concurrent review. I look forward to receiving everyone's comments as soon as they have had a chance to review the drafts. Sincerely, Douglas S. Palmer, Jr. DSP:cdb Enclosures cc: Kgell Stoknes /Encl.'s Pamela Ackley - Bell /Encl. Art Mcllwain /Encl. March , 1978 Hanover Management, Inc. c /o,4400 Seattle -First National • Bank Building Seattle, Washington 98154 Gentlemen: RECEIVE O.C.D. CITY OF TUKWILA Mae 1 4 1978 This refers, to two letters of credit dated March , 1978 opened by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Seattle, Washington for your account and in our favor'in the amount of $180,000 each, in lieu of providing bonds for the construc- tion of certain roads shown in Binding Site Improvement Plan No. 77 -32 relating to certain real property in Tukwila. With •reference thereto, this will confirm the City of Tukwila's agreement that it will draw under either of the letters of credit only in the event that: 1. The state of facts required to be stated in the affidavit under the letter of credit to be drawn under is true and correct; and 2. The City has given notice to you of intent to draw under such letter of credit at least 15 days prior to drawing thereunder and such state of facts remains true and correct at the end of such 15 -day period. It is understood and agreed that such letters of credit are in lieu of supplyinq performance bonds for the completion' of the above- mentioned roads and that the City will draw under the letters of credit only such amount(s) that the City in good faith estimates it would cost to complete the road or roads in question, and that any and all amounts drawn under either of the letters of credit which have not reasonably been expended in the completion of the road in question will be refunded to Hanover. CITY OF TUKWILA By Its B34/b1 (TO BE TYPED ON CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE STAfit �I� Y) O.C.D. CITY OF TUKWILA March , 1978 Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington Attention: Mr. Kgell Stoknes Gentlemen: tc MAR 1 4 1978 We hereby open our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. in "your favor and we hereby authorize you on or after June 1, 1978 to draw on Canadian Imperial Bank of. Commerce, Seattle, Washington for account of Hanover Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation, up to the aggregate amount of One Hundred Eighty Thousand and No /10.0 Dollars ($180,000.00) available by your draft drawn at sight on us and accompanied by an affidavit executed by the of the City of Tukwila on behalf of the City to the effect that: 1. The northern roadway shown in Binding Site Improvement Plan No. 77 -32 relating to certain real property in Tukwila ( "Corporate Drive North ") has not been com- pleted in accordance with the plans therefor approved by the City; 2. The buildings known as Buildings 3, 4, 7 and 9 to be con- structed on the property covered by such Binding Site Improvement Plan have been completed and have been occu- pied by Hanover Management, Inc. ( "Hanover ") or tenants of Hanover; and 3. The City of Tukwila in good faith estimates that it would cost approximately the amount being drawn under this Letter of Credit to complete Corporate Drive North and certifies for the benefit of Hanover that all amounts drawn hereunder which have not reasonably been expended in the completion of Corporate Drive North will be refunded to Hanover. This Letter of Credit expires in Seattle, Washington on September 1, 1978. City of Tukwila March , 1978 Page 2 Any draft drawn under this credit must be enfaced' "Drawn under Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Seattle, Washington, Credit No. , dated March , 1978." We hereby agree with the drawers, endorsers and holders in due course of any draft drawn under this credit that such drafts shall be duly honored on presentation provided that all terms and conditions of the credit have been complied with. CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE By Its (TO BE TYPED ON CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE STATIONARY) March , 1978 Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington Attention: Mr. Kgell Stoknes Gentlemen: FIECEOVC; O.C.D. CITY OF TUKWIIA 11AR 1 4 1978 We hereby open our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No., in your favor and we hereby authorize you on or after July 1, 1978 to draw on Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Seattle, Washington for account of Hanover Management, Inc.,. a Delaware corporation, up to the aggregate amount of One Hundred Eighty Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($180,000.00) available by your draft drawn at sight on us and accompanied by an affidavit executed by the of the City of Tukwila on behalf of the City to the effect that: 1. The southern roadway shown in Binding Site Improvement Plan No. 77 -32 relating to certain real property in Tukwila ( "Corporate Drive South ") has not been com- pleted in accordance with the plans therefor approved by the City; 2. The buildings known as Buildings 5 and 6 to be con- structed on the property covered by such Binding Site Improvement Plan have been completed and have been occupied by Hanover Management, Inc. ( "Hanover ") or tenants of Hanover; and 3. The City of Tukwila in good faith estimates that it would cost approximately the amount being drawn under this Letter of Credit to complete Corporate Drive South and certifies for the benefit of Hanover that all amounts drawn hereunder which have not reasonably been expended in the completion of Corporate Drive South will be refunded to Hanover. This Letter of Credit expires in Seattle, Washington on October 1, 1978. City of Tukwila March , 1978. Page 2 Any draft drawn under this credit must be enfaced "Drawn under Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Seattle, Washington, Credit No. , dated March , 1978." We hereby agree with the drawers, endorsers and holders in due course of any draft drawn under this credit that such drafts shall be duly honored on presentation provided that all terms and conditions of the credit have been complied with. CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE By Its PLANNING PARKS S RECREATION BUILDING March 16, 1978 • CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Hanover Management, Inc. c/o 4400 Seattle First National Bank Building Seattle, Washington 98154 Gentlemen: This refers to two letters of credit dated March 16, 1978 opened by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Seattle, Washington for your account and in our favor in the amounts of $180,000 and $200,000, respectively, in lieu of pro- viding bonds for the construction of certain roads shown in Binding Site Improvement Plan No. 77-32 relating to certain real property in Tukwila. With reference thereto, this will confirm the City of Tukwila's agreement that it will draw under either of the letters of credit only in the event that: 1. The state of facts required to be stated in the affidavit under the letter of credit to be drawn under is true and correct and the completion .of the road in question has not been delayed by any act of God or other event beyond your reason- able control; and 2. The City has given notice to you at the above address, attention Daniel J: Riviera, of intent to draw under such letter of credit at least 15 days prior to drawing thereunder and such state of facts remains true and correct at the end of such 15 -day period. It is understood and agreed that such letters of credit are in lieu of supplying performance bonds for the completion of the above - mentioned roads and that the City will draw under the letters of credit only such amount(s) that the City in good faith estimates it would cost to complete the road or roads in question, and that the City will make best efforts to complete the road(s) in question as soon as possible after such amount(s) have been drawn. Any and all amounts drawn under either of the letters of credit which have not reasonably been expended in the completion of the road in question will be refunded to you forthwith upon completion of the road, but in no event later than January 1, 1979. CITY OF TUKWILA Concurrence: cc: Mayor Bauch Terry Monaghan By Its 6-" 61Y►inuk Larry Hard, Deputy City Attorney 6230 Southcenter Boulevard v Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 (206) 242 -2177 411 CITY OF TUKWILA • OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 14teP .H13 /FINAL i I)ECLARATIOiJ OF S4al-I t1 /L'1O SIGiJIFICAi10E Description of proposal Southcenter Cor orate S u417 Proponent Hanover Management Inc. Location of Proposal. Southcenter Corporate Square - Andover Park East Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD =47 This proposal has been determined to (knot have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (444is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of, a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official K.iell Stoknes. Position /Title Date COMMENTS: O.C.D. Director 3 Februar 1978 Signature CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIR1DENTAL QUESTIOdNAIRE REVINIVORM PROJECT NAME: 6. c.5. ?law J'Z A:43Z PROJECT ADDRESS: 6opitta4,06 r ✓ 6/0444 -%tdVev 64,k rws-f DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: aji444441 1771 DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ®. Planning: /07t' by: (� 4v k ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: (TO BE COMPLETED. BY THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL) 3. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. i nature and Title of Responsible Official 4. Applicant was notified of decision on: 3/, /7c9 D'te by by Staff Person Letter, Phone Date In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 986. TO: l(j;. FROM: SUBJECT: OFF12E MEMO ` CITY OFflJKWILA //a zr 6,1&"1— put . Wia4- q5Q1r. de.(4s1,41 vev1/Ld.. tr51 P 1.4 41,,k !(. /1�( wm.wu�.:A c.4.4+ Ate_ RAM_ Atve,/,;., b tigte 0-0.+ e... . 0).5_ — %,/,t,74-h/k- d/ti 4/mg 44,3 X Cerr p Vises 1� 164-&-r- V/14/44,1 w€ 'It Alld 912(Jf' 1/1417/ I` ellpUcd i s74 w fi ou - -c jU5 sa4' ( • CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for. permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is-exempt or unless the applicant and. Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Hanover Management Inc. 2. Address and Phone Number of Propcnent: ;Suite 300, 1027.Yonge Street, Toronto, - Canado '114W 3E8 (416), 964-2811 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 11 January 1978''1 4. Agency Requiring Checklist:Building and Planning 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Southcenter Corporate Square Phase II & Phase III. 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Phase II: Two (2) story office buildings connected by a second floor bridge. Total floor area 40,000 sf (-) approximately in total development. Phase III: Five (5) each two story office buildings, four (4) of which are connected by a two story atrium and second floor bridges within atrium. The re- maining building is- connected.to one of the four by..a:second floor bridge. Total loor are, 1.00;0.00. sf (4 .approximately in a total 19.'089`"-acre development. (i4O1ooD i,py04. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the, physical setting of the proposal, as - well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- . pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Phase II open property on a filled, level area presently covered with light vegetation at 66U -SYS Andover Park East, total Site area 211,146 sf approximately. Phase III open property on a filled, level area presently covered with light vegetation at 650 -695 Andover Park East, total site area 301,394 sf approximately. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Phase II- July 1978: ..._. Phase III- _,Nty7197`3 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the .Proposal (federal, state and local): (a). Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES (b) King County Hydraulics Permit. . YES NO X (c) Building permit YES X NO (d) .Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X • (e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO (f). Sign permit YES X NO (g) Water hook up permit YES X NO (h) Storm water system permit 0 YES X NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) .YES X NO (k) Plumbing permi King Cou ty) th� YES X NO (1) Other: ON C r 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Binding site Improvement Plan City of Tukwila Planning. Commission — B. A. Q. City of Tukwila Building Permit II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO Paving X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of_air movement, moisture cr temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: A) YES MAYBE NO • l Aef trcw • /4It A4;1-1 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (e) (f) X X X • (h) Deterioration in groundwater quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X/ Explanation: b 0 atufsk, 4,6"1 .,1141 .kit 404 j i cvYa 44.. yL1' 'moo swr-( wuiw Mai aer.Vt' u` 1 th4fAl yzo4 S. YES MAYBE NO X 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or, endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in 'a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: a ariul I A44 £xih videitiati b) NI i►-Iys4 w No AA- 0124 1Gw IA, 14445 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) x X X Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? LL Explanation: tc)wit ti i614(.4 ••--...... JAI T • d) r'''at li" er- a�usMS� - �e,�.�L• • •t YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will'the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: PtM . rooks 4!k f X 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: 11. Population. Explanation: • • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, • bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: Office activity. in: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities., including roads? YES MAYBE NO x X X X X X X • YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X Explanation: New Buildings 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of X energy? — Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X (b) Communications systems? X (c) Water? X (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X (e) Storm water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: X • • YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a.signifi-- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or wirlful lack of full disclosure on my part. X X X RECEIPT.' Received From Address / c" D(?tars$Ste,612) ACCOUNT. AMT. OF ACCOUNT HOW PAID CASH AMT. PAID CHECK BALANCE • DUE MONEY 'ORDER 8X808 Redlrm