The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-5 - BENAROYA COMPANY - CARRIAGE HOUSE FURNITURECARRIAGE HOUSE FURNITURE STORE PARKWAY PLAZA WEST EPIGFD -05 PLACil IIIG PARKS Z. RECREATION BUILDING • CITY ofTUKWIL OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 10 November 1976 Mr. Kenneth Long Benaroya Company 5950 - 6th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 Dear Mr. Long: Please find enclosed a Final Declaration of Non - Significance for the construction of the Carriage House furniture store at the Parkway Plaza West development site. This fulfills SEPA requirements for the referenced project only. Please note the comment by the Responsible Official regarding potential problems with circulation and utilities with respect to the future develop- ment of Parkway Plaza West. Sincerel Gary Crutch ield Assistant Planner GC /cw Encl: as 6230 Sonth.:on`e i0 „u2,:;c:r3 n Tikwil: , 9R269 ra (23&) 242-2377 • CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above infor- mation is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation of willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Chief Architect November 4, 1976 Signature and Title Date Project Name: The Carriage House Project Address: 17333 South Center Parkway, Tukwila, Washington BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS: 1.. Date of Review: Building Planning Engineering Police Fire // /S /7. / 6 by: / _7 by: C sg1�.�.✓, � by: by: 2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental. impact and application should be processed without further - consideration of environmental affects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. Check one ( +) or ( -) ( +) or ( +) or (?-)-"-- ( +) or ( -) ( +) or ( -) More specific information is Signatur t 0.41e o needed to de/�termine impact. / LJw/Mqed L2-e/ t"Ly'.�il� 5Z /G Zh U(4 • _1' 1 141-. ficial it%c/ -e- -*/ � % ('7(t5, 3. Applicant w.s notified of de/ sion on- 4e7 "471;if 10 November 1976 by Gary Crutchfiel Staff Person Date by _ Letter Letter, phone In accordance with l' ash: ngton State Environmental Policy Ac. t. `and City of 'i'li'.:w i.1a Ordi.nnn e No. 759. (1.) ;•iL`fl.I1s recommend. _I i1.1 cnvi.roIlment:a.1 impact Statellienl be dnf_ %. (- i. L.fIS fecOIII!:._•ntl :i i ;`ilva.roilliiCn'•_:l1 inpact sta ei'.'-..1.!: not be CiO_li.. • CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the•undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above infor- mation is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation of willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Chief Architect Signature and Title Project Name:' The Carriage House November 4, 1976 Date Project Address: 17333 South Center Parkway, Tukwila, Washington BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE`ONLY ACTION BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS: Check one 1. Date of Review: Building by: ( +) or ( -) Planning // S17 L by: ( +) or ( Engineering dol/g0/?46 by: / ( +) or ( Police by: ( +) or ( -) Fire by: ( +) or ( -) 2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ- mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. • �c f {D 6e' 44 cep c d 6 -i 4t e a,,, q0 r oy ;to f S S v sir c-e, i Signatur: ^? � � ''le • -� • • � � - � ficial 3. Applicant w s notified of decision on: Date by by Staff Person Letter, phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 759. ( +) ( -) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be done. Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not be done. •Ep-c-(- • (j1 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official agree ahead that a full environmental impact statement needs to be completed. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Jack A. Benaroya Co. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 5950 - 6th Ave. South Seattle, Washington 98108, Phone 762 -4750 3. Date Checklist Submitted: November 4, 1976 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Department 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:Carriage House 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an ac- curate understanding of its scope and nature): 20,000 sq. ft., wood framed building, single story furniture and interiors store 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, in- cluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): Approx. 60,000 sq. ft. of land at 17333 Southcenter Parkway on a cleared, fairly flat site. Site is in an M -1 zone on west sjde pf Southcenter Parkway, across street from Parkway Plaza North. 8. Estima °ted Date for Completion of the Proposal: April 1, 1977 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local — including rezones): (a) Rezone, conditional' use, substantial development, etc. YES NOV ,' (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO (c) Building permit YES X NO • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO (f) Sign permit YES X NO (g) Water hook up permit YES X NO (h) Storm water system permit YES. NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Property north and south of the project which is owned by Jack A. Benaroya Co. will be commercially developed. A plan for this property has not been developed. 11. uo you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: See item 10. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal ;'if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: to P1 crilrrl ny lroimifl ss 1 on tiny as Boat d of At chi Leci,u ral Review apwruv site plan and elevations on September 23. 1976. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? Compacted fill will be placed on X site. (c) C ange in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? Some compacted fill for a stabilized base in X asphalt parking areas. (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- X X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Paved areas will require storm drainage system. (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- X X X X X X X X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- X able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? New species as a result of landscaping planter areas. (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration . or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: X X X X 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of . the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: • • • YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate . of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? resulting from retail activity (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? approx. 44 stalls required (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) X X Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: LACOL ini 04- lwrI GmA5 o04.4.1 i;sdIvtc w►duc& w+ s- vt4u4 i 4t woss Sevi&c .1" P* k«..w vt .st -(w -f rr.4i c 61)...44:344:•.. AAA.— l .kL a 1 tat. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: X (a) Power or natural gas? X (b) Communications systems? X (c) Water? X (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X (e) Storm water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or histor- ical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X X