HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-50 - MORGAN BRUCE - OFFICE BUILDINGMORGAN OFFICE BUILDING
52 AVE S &
SOUTHCENTER BLVD
EPIC -FD -50
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED /FINAL
DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal
Proponent
Location of Proposal.
Lead Agency
. Office Building
Bruce Morgan
62nd Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard
City of Tukwila
File No. EPIC -FD -50
This proposal has been determined to ( /not have) a significant adverse im-
pactupon the environment. An EIS (4.61is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Kjell Stoknes
Position /Title OCD Director
Date
COMMENTS:
March 1 1978 Signature
No building permit or foundation- permit to be issued until the following
agreements have been executed:
1. Landscape and maintenance agreement
2. Temporary construction easement
3. Developers agreement
3-/ 78"
28 February 1978
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kjell Stoknes, Dir ' tor, OCD
FROM: Gary Crutchfield stant Planner
SUBJECT: THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Morgan Office Building
Based on all information requested by this office and submitted by the appli-
cant, there appears to be no significant adverse environmental effect as a
result of the proposed action, either directly or indirectly.
I recommend a Declaration of Non - Significance be, issued with the note that
Development Agreements regarding access and treatment of the south bank will
be executed prior to issuance of Building Permit.
GC /ch
6230 Southcenter Boulevard ® Tukwila, Washington 98188 ® (206) 242 -2177
TIMOTHY BRADBURV
ANNE BRADLEY
KATHY A. COCHRAN
STEPHEN C. ELLIS
WILLIAM R. HICKMAN
WILLIAM L. HOLDER
HUGH A. MCCLURE
Rov J. MOCERI
D. BRUCE MORGAN
RONALD J. PEREY
ROBERT C. PIERCE - DICKERSON
JOHN W. RANKIN, JR.
RICHARD C. REED
DENNIS SMITH
ROGER L. STOUDER
JERRY E. THONN
GUY I. TOWLE
JOHN D. WILSON, JR.
February 28, 1978
REED MCCLURE MOCERI & THONN, P. S.
A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1701 BANK OF CALIFORNIA CENTER
900 FOURTH AVENUE
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98164
Mr. Gary Crutchfield
City of Tukwila
6230 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Re: APP #77 -91
Dear Mr. Crutchfield:
SEATTLE
(206) 292 -4900
TACOM A
(206) 927 -5888
CABLE R2MT SEATTLE
IN REPLY REFER TO
OUR FILE NO.
This letter will serve to confirm that the landscape treatment of
the city's bank or slope area contiguous to our building site and
the remaining open space areas on the site itself will be in con-
formance with the plans to be approved by the Department of Public
Works pursuant to pending landscape and maintenance agreement and
developers agreement.
Very truly yours,
D. Bruce Morgan
DBM /klh
4501 Shilshole Ave. N.W., Seattle, Washington 98107 (206) 789 -1012
February 24, 1978
City of Tukwila
6230 S. Center Blvd.
Tukwila, Washignton 98188
Re: Tukwila Office Building
ATTN: Mr. Gary Crutchfield, Assistant Planner
Dear Mr. Crutchfield;
ECEIVf
FEB 2 4 1978
QIY OF iUKWIL4
In answer to your letter dated February 23, 1978, Please find,
enclosed, a copy of the soils report for the subject property.
The building inspector also has a copy for his records. The
landscaping plan will be submitted by the owners for the en-
tire site. The storm and sanitary sewer lines will be install-
ed as per the city's requirements which I understand to be
installing an 8" sanitary sewer line to the city's line, to the
south of the property and installing a 12" storm line to the
ditch on the highway to the south of the property. I understand
a new storm drainage plan for that area will be installed this
summer and our line will connect to the new line when it is.
available. The exterior of the building will be wood siding =
stained.
If you have any further questions please don't hesitate to get
in touch with us. Thank you for your time and consideration
of our project. .
Very Truly Yours,
PACIFIC PINES, INC. 5 1'
40,1 hicaterk
Donald Halbrook
President
DH /kl
i
T
BOX 126 HOBART, WASHINGTON 98025
TEL: AREA 206 - 682 -6942
•
EARTH SCIENCE ENGINEERING
December 6, 1977
Pacific Pines, Inc.
4501 Shilshole Avenue N. W.
Seattle, Washington 98107
Gentlemen:•
Reported herein are my findings on the soil conditions at
the site of your proposed office building in Tukwila. The
work was authorized by you a week or so ago following con-
versations between myself, Gary Scott, and Bruce'Morgan.
The building would be single story and of ,wood -frame con-
struction with underground parking. The site is imme-
diately north of Southcenter and a few hundred yards west
of the new Tukwila City Hall. A wood -frame house presently
occupies part of the proposed building area.
The concern which prompted my involvement stemmed from
the steepness of the downhill slope immediately south of
the south edge of the office building. A cut slope of
30 -33° extends from the north shoulder of Southcenter
Boulevard to the approximate edge of the subject site.
The vertical height is about 35 -40 feet. Essentially no
filling is proposed, and cuts will be limited to about'
six feet, primarily along the north side of the building
to accommodate the underground parking.
Conditions were explored by digging five backhoe test
pits at locations shown on page 4,which is a partial,
Page 2
Pacific Pines, Inca
December 6, 1977
reduced copy of'preliminary sheet-1. These were carried
to a maximum depth of-13.1 feet. In- progress: soil logs -
were maintained based 'on visual and textural examination
of the soil. Copies of the logs are shown . on page 5. In
addition, I reviewed the technical documents applicable to
that area and made a reconnaissance of the cut slope. -
In digging test pit 5, the water.service line to the house
was damaged:. As a result; backhoe time beyond that •
originally estimated was incurred.:,
Two basic soil types were noted in the test pits and along
the existing• downhill cut. First, the uppermost soil is
glacial till which extends beyond the depth of test pit1.''
It has a-minimum thickness of near zero in the vicinity of
pit•2. Till is a mixture of silt, sand, and gravel.
Characteristically, it grades harder and less permeable
downward with depth as a result of weathering.
Underlying the till is a massive formation which" consists
mainly of sandstone. Where severely weathered, .. the appear-
ance and general character of the rock is somewhat similar .
to till. Even well below the effects of weathering along'
the-toe of the roadcut, the material is weak and friable .
by bedrock standards. It can easily be excavated with
' conventional construction equipment. At comparable shallow
depths, however, .the sandstone is stronger and less com-
'pressible than the glacial soil.
Test pits 1, 4, and 5 encountered groundwater seepage`at
depths between 2h and 4»'feet. This a shallow, -
perched condition totally unrelated to the regional ground-.
�
-water level. The condition may be intermittent. It is
important to this project only insomuch as it will be a
nuisance during the early stages of construction. Except
for the relatively unweathered sandstone, all of the. '(
materials logged are highly moisture sensitive; they tend
to mud if. subjected to traffic or other disturbance under
wet conditions. Once construction is completed,--the-water-.,-.7,-_.7-
will not affect the soil's compressibility or strength.
In my opinion, the hillside to the south is stable and.
need not be investigated further. Placement- of-the
building will not lessen the stability unless revisions
are made which would place large quantities of fill near '
the south property line. .-. • - . ..
Page 3 December 6, 1977
Pacific Pines, Inc.
Conventional spread footing support of the building is'
recommended. It will be necessary to found parts of the
structure on glacial soil and parts on residual sandstone.
Since the till is weaker than the weathered rock at, compara-
ble depth, and to minimize differential settlement, I'
recommend that all footings be placed at least 4 feet below .,• -
present grade and that bearing pressures be :Limited to
4 ksf. To comply wjth building code, no footing, either'
continuous or isolated, should be less than 14 inches wide.'
Footing drains should be provided.
I understand that a small quantity of fill may be placed
along, the south edge of the parking slab. Iii will not be
practical to use onsite material for. that purpose. .4L more
easily compact ble granular material is suggested.-. -
•
If you wish inspection service during Construction or have
any other questions, please give me a call.
ours very t
ames N. Ea
JNE : gle
cc . Gary;ScottY
1.9.7
TEST PIT LOGS
3 8'
Brown silty fine to
coarse sand w /gravel -
(weathered till)
Light brown silty' fine . +;
to coarse sand w /gravel
(relatively unweathered
till) •
13.0 Completed; seepage'at-
- 2.5'
0
0.5
1.6
X5.1
3
0 Brown. silty-line to
coarse sand w /grave l
(weathered till)
1.2' Yellowish brown fine .
sand with silt
(weathered sandstone)
9.0 Completed; no
groundwater
•
Topsoil (weathered from
till) • ,•
Washed rock (abandoned
drainfield)
Brown silty fine to.
coarse sand w /grave,l
(till, 'weathered.to
4')
•
0
0.6'
4.
Dark gray severely weathered7 2
silt stone
Light gray to yellowish
brn. fine sand (weathered
from sandstone) : 12.0
12.5 Completed; no groundwater
J -
0 = Variable loose fill and topsoil
1.1' Brown silty fine to coarse sand '
with gravel (till, weathered
to 4.6') .
4.6
Topsoil (weathered from
till) `
Brown silty fine to
coarse sand w /gravel
(weathered till)
Brown silty fine to coarse sand
(weathered from sandstone)
13.1 Completed; seepage at 4.5'.
Brown silty fine to
coarse sand w /gravel...
(relatively unweathered
till)
Variable gray and brown
fine sand and silty fine
sand (weathered from
sandstone)
Completed; seepage at
3.5'.
PLANNING
PARKS 8
RECREATION
BUILDING
CITY of TUKW9LA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
23 February 1978
Mr. Bruce Morgan
320 Andover Park East
Tukwila, Washington 98188
RE: Tukwila Office Building
Dear Mr. Morgan:
In review of the Environmental Checklist submitted for the above- referenced
project, we find the following additional information to be necessary.
1. A copy of the soils report referred to on Sheet A -:l of the submitted
drawings.
2. Description of the manner in which the bank adjacent your south pro -
perty line will be treated. (Pursuant to our meeting of 2/10/78.)
3. Description of the method of storm and sanitary sewer extension to
Southcenter Boulevard.
4. Description of the materials and treatment of the building exterior.
Inasmuch as this information is necessary to arrive at a Threshold Determina-
tion regarding the project, it is to your benefit to supply it at your earliest
conven nce. Should you have any questions, please contact me.
/
Since'r'ely,
Gary Crutcjfield
Assistant Tanner
GC /ch
6230 Southcenter Boulevard a Tukwila, Washington 98188 a (206) 242 -2177
• CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must he completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Bruce Morgan
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 320 Andover Parke
Seattle, WA 98188 (206) 292 -4900
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwilla Engineering Dept.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Tukwilla Office Building
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size., general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): A one story wood frame
building of approx. 7400 sq. ft. to house business office space. General
design elements include pitched & flat wood-roofs, wood siding, off street
parking under the building with on site walkways and paved driveway leading
to 62nd Ave.-S----
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im -.
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
tacated
north of th
be maintained with newly added flora.
rstate 405, directly
ing trees will
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: July 1, 1978,
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES X NO
(c) Building permit YES X NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO
(f) Sign permit YES ' NO X
(g) Water hook up permit YES X NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES X NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES NO X
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO
(1) Other:
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
Not at the present time.
'11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and - "maybe" answers are required)
1 Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcove r
ing of the soil?
Excavation for footings and retaining walls
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
.t
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
X
X
X
X
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change_ in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
-area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
Explanation:
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
11. Population. Will. the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation: Elimination of an existing two story
structure that is apporximatly
40 years old.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
Egress and ingress to building
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
Provide an site *parking for
twenty vehicles.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
:•
(f) Other governmental services?
Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
'Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
•
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation.:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency .
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Signature and Title)
Date .
X
X
•
8K808 Rethfrrn
•
't
. , . 9 0 2
RECEIPT ' • Date_t•— —4...4—, 19_ .•
Received From 41,, 4, firMilinM .
Address S-6 I 1 iiiMigerib in _41.' .. & -
I
. A °liars . -S0042)
. ,
/ , •
For 1 id' / , , i •
., •
HOW PAID
..1--t ■11A)111(9\-.
Am r. °ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
CASH
,
• ,
By
rIS AMT. PAID
.p\..,
CHECK
1.-
BALANCE
DUE
MONEY
OPDER
8K808 Rethfrrn
U3 11 '; U3 (.,.� 11.thi i t+ u 3 3.:.J ;11.1i;4
Southcenter Blvd.
‚6230
'ukwila, L"lashington 98067
Phone: (206) 242 -2177
;CATION OF WORK / NUMBER & STREET
;APP -77-91
17
BLOCK
1NER
SUBDIVISION
B2UcE ,I4 C '4N.
1/4.1i
)DRESS
320 4NDoVc PAe/< E, ft.-c �✓"�
',ME OF BUILDER
PA C /./C • P/N ES , /.v c .
)DRESS
45-6) sr/IOLE ,4 vE. lv.ty.
•
•
aUfl Dl e OE?r. •
PHONE
2 2 '-fgoU
• STATE LICENSE NO.PAC( PI Z‘18 At Z
• SALES TAX NO. G GOO iq ( 3 Z-,
PONE
7r /o/2.
/5-o1000 liat.
ESTIMATED VALUE ,,;ppyy,
COMPLETED WORK $ .7:2-51609
i
7�p,
.APPLICATION ' PERMIT FEE • $ ,j UGI
FOR PLAN CHECK FEE $ 2-- 0 0
BUILDING PERMIT
LATE PERMIT FEE
DATE TODAY
:SCRtPT1ON OF WORK:
eviu5rieve7 .4- NE3-14)
7000 J q fT
$
TOTAL FEE
TYPE OF
CONST.
FIRE
ZONE
s f/ 7. 6 U
FIRE SPRINKLERS
REQUIRED `JYes
OCCUPANCY
GROUP ff��
0
USE
ZONE
MAX.
OCC. LOAD
1 Am7 nF T F;'!ANT'
NATURE OF BUSINESS :.
THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY OR ON UTILITY EASEMENTS.
SEPARATE' PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING.
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NO WORK IS TO BE DONE EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IN APPROVED PLANS AND
- SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT ALL WORK IS TO CONFORM TO TUKWILA CODES AND ORDINANCES.
APPLICANT Pg67 /. C "ti Es /NC
• 43" ("4
•• •4
XI" .
A; •;•.*:;.,,,
.145.1mcm,r"...,0T4r7T,
wisioNst
:.:..a,
4
. • . ,...,4„.
.3..,,,
•
-4
4Z
0
ma
0
0
7
. .
:. \ -. . • - . , :.-2.
. .
.:CNERAL NOTES_
. .
I. ALL WORK TO CONFORM TO LOCAL COM A ORDINANCES. ....:f)
2 vERIFY ALL GRADES, OIMENSIONS 2. ExI5T1NG CONDITIONS AT :-
siff BEFORE PROCEEDING wiTH WORK.
J. .0I4EN5I0N5 SHOwN•ARE TO FACE OF STUD, FACE OF CONCRETEL.
012 CENTERLINE OF WINDOWS 0 PARTITIONS AS NOTED. . .•
..
4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL ROUGH-1N DIMENSIONS FOR EQUIP-,
l
AUNT FURNISHED 8.INSTALIF'O BY 4705(11 ER OTHERS. ..•..Y
I
• -...,
GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOT E if.994DA ION SuBM I 1
I. ALL MATERIALS' AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS .. •
OF THCOFTANINGS. SPECIFICATIONS. AND THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE./ .
2 CONCRETE SHALL ATTAIN A MINIMUM 28 DAY STRENGTH OF Pc ' 3,000
P-S-FTL-NCI MIX SHALL CONTAIN NOT LESS THAN 5-1/2 SACKS OF CEMENT
PER CUBIC YARD.
3. RE 1 NFORC I NG STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPEC IF 1 CAT ION 4615-22,
GRADE 60, fy 60 --p PSI. WELDED WIRE MESH SHALL ,314FORM
TO ASTM A-185 • '
4. LAP ALL COM (MMUS REINFORCEmENT 30 DIAmETERs uNLESS NOTED
. OTHE-R41,1 ON PLANS. PROvIDE CORNER BARS AT ALL WALL INTER-
SECTIONS TO MATCH ' 'MAL HORIZONTAL REINFORCMENT. 1AP CORNEST
• BARS 10 DIAMETERS 2
5. CONTRACTOR TO CONSULT PLANS OF ALL TRADES FOR ALL OPENINGS
• THROuGH SLABS. wALLS, CEILINGS. ROOFS FOR DUCTS..P1OES,$‘..
CONDUITS. CABINETS, 6 EQUIPMENT VERIFY ALL SIZES 810CAT.
WITH SUBCONTRACTORS
6. ALL PIPES, DUCTS, CONDUITS. ETC TO BE FLOUTED IN AT .A1E-ill,
F INI SHED 04)1 5.
7. ALL STEEL EXPOSED TO WEATHER TO BE HOT-DIP GALVANIZED
AFTER FABRICATION.
< • - riF-e
- pr3 -no!: •
duo • . 2 ak7,4:4.
•
0,44, •1011.W1`1.
•
4' tc:7 'orfeftl, 7-1P"
. - ". Ha2K4,) •
' I
•
7. 1),{1,,0T5i, _PROTECT ION AgIVER), REINFURCING 53ILL SHALL BE AS
.
•
8. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL 10 81 NON-CORROSlyE FINISHED AFTER..
FABRICATION.
• : •...:sj
44? ,..
4. ALL PIPING IN ((11 186 0 EXTERIOR wALLS 10 BE ON wARM SIDE" .1,:..
OF THERMAL INSULATION
.•
10. PROVIDE ARCHITECT WITH COMPLETE AS.BUIL I ORAwINGS FOR
STRuCTuRAL, TIUmBING, 17EAT1NG. 061761101 108, AIR C071DITID71
ELECTRICAL 0 OTHER WORK CONCEALED BY 111(50(0 SURFACES. -ft •
DO NOT TAKE ROW FINISH 5(11(0016 05 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION.
FOR ALL INTERIOR ROM mATERIALS CONTRACTOR TO CHECK THES • -.;.!.
501007115 HIIII SPECIFICA110:40 6 071,....;04SS TN; ..[,,Lv •••A'FPIA7 IC
NOT ,-OvEPED BY 'ANIMA F. SCHFOIRFS To 141 RINnING To ..Hr .17, (1
OE 1:11 m.AILRIALS THEY DO ',JICITY, .
pRO4IDE DuCTS PENETRAT ING ONE mOUR WALLS WITH APPROVES ..4[:.
13. SEE sTRucTuRAL mrcitANITAI . A 1111181107 OPAww.S FGR 40011105AL
NOTES A 5771m15.
AIR 018011 IONING By INA( CONTRACTOR.
mtcHANICAt 1(1(5 ELLETRICAL UNDER SLPARAIE PERMIT.
12
Au i LILA 1 IF 1146 DATIPERS AT wALl
• ."
I "G47i> • -••,..311 L- •
•
Tr1.-•T-
:(.; 0-'*■""06 •
or-*--
"G.
%,7 I.416,41,56.4kt
/1/4.1,11c.:r_•.; %:.41 •
• •
• ,■•
•
•
'•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FOOTINGS AND OTHER unFORMED SURFACES. EAPTH FACE - 3"
TOWED SUFACES IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH EARTH .. . 2'
BEAMS, COLUMNS AND SURFACES EXPOSED TO wEATHER .
SLABS 080 WAILS (INTERIOR FACE) ..... . .
1-1/2"
3/4'
t STRuCtuRAL.STELL, INCIUDING P10165 17116 ROLLED SHAPES, SHALL co-
rOfqm 86 AS"TM A.36, Fy ' 36 651 STEEL PIPE SHALL 00411000 TO
ASTM A-53-72A, TYRE E OR S. GRADE B, Fy . 35 (SI BOLTS SHALL
CONFORM TO ASTM A 307
; ALL 14fLoi4c SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE MIIH AISC AND ANS STANDARDS
AND sari: 66 PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED WELDERS.
R ALL,WOOD PLATES IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH CONCRETE 574011 BE PRESSURE
10(111(3 11(674071 APPROVED 741 4)4001196
LotRALTOR SHALL PROVILA (711110110710 66ACI717, (DR IHL .317411U111
AND-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS 7116 (1 ALL FINAL CONNECTIONS HAVE
BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE RIM THE PLANS.
.10 DRAWINGS INDICATE GENERAL AND TYPICAL 0LTAIL5 OF CONSTRUCTION
WHIRI CONDITIONS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED, BUT ARE OF
SIMILAR CHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. SIMILAR DETAILS OF CON.
STRHCTION SHALL BE USED, SUBJECT 10 REVIEW AND APPROvAL BY
THE ARCHITECT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
11 . CARRY ALL FOOTINGS TO SOLID U20151406 ORIGINAL EARTH AS IN-
DIETTEt 64 'Fr..AWSNET TO miromum VERTICAL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON
PLANS.
i 2. OESIGN CRITERIA (uNIFORM BUILDING COM:
• • ROOF LL 25 PSF
, .
on711.11
TAIP S,./..11144
.1(71 :0 Psi
EARTHQUAKE lone 3
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE '4.000 PSF
Based on FomnowOon repo01 .hy E4vt11 Science ENIneerIng
11.7
;17
,
-
4
-4 r;•.;
1
ao-.1 -
n,-."61. • .
•
-
-444, t,S4.;
1- •
r4e.imImt
fri
;.i • 1'
gl
....411, ar-4. • ' '..?(;), ilear:r-il";-
. . m.r- .:7 ,./. , AC %Y-.."' 47..: •r...4,. . c'-' '71.4,-::- . .1, .„.)i • 4.,L
, l
.. ,.. . ..
..,,7,,.,.p6ic-•Li7.
.7... "' .•
..r.i..,.i......r!, w ,io. i• .l ..s.'•t, !.;i " 2Fa., 2
4_..
./"-'., 4 .. • -:,:':''. '
••■,
riec;.f.,- et .....,
d It_
'L
A' eeis7.,01, -
,, .; ' • . . /t‘\// ''
-;- 6:' -':- 1• - . ,A-L; r 1) : - . : ,. . .7h. , • '/'""- ■
. .-, 1.l"17 (07 -
•
..• l'
- • - A ‘: 1 - 4 1 - ); ( , C‘*.:: -c . A 1 -::: f . :. /' ' • u • - 4' ' 7 - ,,,...L.vr......,..,1,,,....._;,,..,r.,g.,....,„4:11.1,:.,..,, • •
.-.1.,...:,-..:.:, i,r-e:p,:-...1
-"_821.^.--•.E.
(5 12.P a....:.*-.
• Arfc9JO'ff4116:2.\77.74 .61 s'',7 c47-:
.?c •
. •i-4.-,,Ze. 4;4; I,/ ,.-... ,..4 •
•
-4
TiP;:/>\:, T'7 F1
2Y4J0.-cd
As.. I /T. 1,4
Cur OF nnmviLA
Sun ma cuART749411
APPI:OVED
ma cox-runstx4 =-47.7 r0
cotts=a. Hon, ; I ■ 0
t= 7.0. Ii• I --C-71....-'
P. r"..1.:7
TYPE CO 'S...". • TN
: rout
natesu.: ! i
RIM i §
1161111:11MG i 1
1 II
mc.t;14•Zii
CM, TUKVOLA
FEI3 2 1978
spamompEpt
SHEET NO.
4.1
q
e I
rf �n
jr!'dz�Cl Ial - b-,n
J 01q.4'f
/ . rr QJ
one
aArr, ..7472 p.yi
SNOISIA31l
REVISIONS
�/ Ftgri. FSE%�WrYo A''
-,1..
3•:F N/oS-'..i. ae w't1NDe •o4 ;.42L-712'
UNPeiruRPSE+Q ef+RTI- d' MIN. Mow. . :
I I..I ESE I r 1 H. FC(IOPO4 i
• r! . 'COIJG�..��I • F •
pbX %b V1.6U:M..•
c.
sI�
gt:'Pre w.
I I jam 4-t
-Li- of • GwU '' I- p--rr:
• ) In.:. I �< I 1
t
911 (� n
J I . •s i o �C GoL 1
--i I i__— — ''-- —_ .— -- ^' L=
I`— ? II'
L /
Gno X % rv-w -•
K
�I� 811 ✓I' '
�✓I I- I 1 ._ -' \h: 111 -(_% VVi
.�dpGl
TI 11
-
t'4,: 24,II
I p
LIMB °I- uA .;ap o<,E;, -'
r�7sLi1�G.G..IA.1YKI4^,% c jja?1/h1
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA -
M.AIN-I.'.��/
YTI/ r,r gal.. •
ham'
6•If Vs/ xz D. ef ze. �� ✓�
"4**I11-t0 (ON
FILE NOM x(08
DATE
DRAW%FU • WIY
CHECKED
APPROVED •