The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-52 - DOCHNAHL CONSTRUCTION - BURKE WAREHOUSEBURKE WAREHOUSE EPIC -FD-52 CITY. OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL 1 . 1 . • 1 , • WITHDRAWAL OF AFFIRMATIVE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Description of proposal Burke Warehouse Proponent Dochnahl Cont,. Inc. (Ron Nolten) Location of Proposal South 143rd Place Lead Agency City of Tukwila File .N EPIC -FD -52 This proposal has been determined to ( 4 /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (his not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by'the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director 18 April 1978 COMMENTS: % /hC:. c -LccC y -% 9- Signature 54, 7803270822 THE GRANTOR, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of having its principal place of business at in said State, for and in consideration of conveys and quit claims to • City of Tukwila the following described real estate, situated in the County of King State of Washington including any interest therein which the grantor may hereafter acquire: Robert M. Burke & Alberta M. Burke , a corporation Vfashington Do Quitclaim Deed the South 14 feet of the following property to the City of Tukwila: 1/2 of South 1/2 .of Lot 13 & South 1/2 of Lot 14 & South 1/2 of Vest 1/2 of Lot 15, Block 17, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, for the purpose of widening South 143rd Place. 152 EXCISE TACoNOT Records Div s nn� Dew Dated this 24th day of P•,,, p 1Y.ki ed and March By By sworn to before me this _ h day of March 1977 Statetashington S�at� of Washington, residing at Seattle. 2 3oPi9Z9 RE Etn a [9� 19 7$ 49. , Notary Public in and for the TO: al( FROM SUBJECT: DFE MEMO CITY OF TUKWILA z (2-17f 72-e-e-- p/7/ V44e/4h- is 5 oce)-- 9o; iwua y-riD iHt 1Q 1•1990 '11/011k,,„T 1,04ekti 4e.ite-0 March 24, 197$ I, Robert M. Burke, owner of. subdivision 1/2 of South 1/2 of Lot 13 & South 1/2 of Lot 14 & South 1/2 of West 1/2 of Lot 15, Block 17, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, hereby agree to the following conditions associated with Building Permit #1419: 1. Dedication of South 14' of property legally described above, to be accomplished by April 1, 1978. 2. Equitable participation in LID for street improvement, to include storm drainage and-water. Robert M. Burk TW Subscribed and sworn to before me this 077'.% of , ' '' i • .'1.' • •'Not ry `Public in and for State of Washington. :,residing atc//WK,L /5 i,� / /PO March 22, 197$ I, Robert M.. Burke, owner of subdivision 1/2 of South 1/2 of Lot 13 & South 1/2 of Lot 14 & South 1/2 of West 1/2 of Lot 15, Block 17, Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, shall quitclaim deed the south 14 feet of above said property-to the City-of Tukwila for widening South 143rd Place. This shall be done prior to April 1, 1978. Signed in presence of Date /f7' .- Robert M. Burke VfGtA2.7L77-J otary Public CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED /rINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE /4RJ SIG►1IFICA4GE- Description of proposal Burke Warehouse Proponent Dochnahl Const. Inc. (Ron Nolten) Location of Proposal. South 143rd Place Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC This proposal has been determined to (have/ ) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision_was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date 9 February 1978 Kjell Stoknes O.C.D. Director COMMENTS: Signature This declaration of significance is made due to negative impacts on additional . demand on substandard roadway and utilities. Pursuant to this, this declara- tion of significance will be withdrawn, pursuant to WAC 197 -•10 -370 if the following are accomplished: 1. Dedication of 14 feet of property should be required to allow for future street improvements. 2. Existing 6" water main is supplied by a 2" line. 6" should be connected to existing water system in this area. 3. An agreement to participate in the cost of improvement of the street and installation of storm drainage, either via LID or developers agreement, should be required. cc: Public Works Dept. ir --• PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6230 Bouthcenter Boulevard El Tukwila, Washington 98067 telephone C 206 3 242 - 2177 February 10, 1978 z To: Gary Crutchfield, Assistant Planner From: Dick Williams, Office Engineer AiG1 C3 Subject: Environmental Review - Burke Warehouse cc I have reviewed the environmental questionnaire and, after discussing it with Terry, have the following comments: Q CL 1. Dedication of 14 feet of property should be required ir to allow for future street improvements. 2. Existing 6" water main is supplied by a 2" line. 6" should be connected to existing water system in this area. W Q) 3. An agreement to participate in the cost of improvement of the street and installation of storm drainage, either via LID or developers agreement, should be required. Qcc: Terry Monaghan 3 4 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORT 1 PROJECT NAME: AR. �{',� l(.E� tt:P/i�1C� PROJECT ADDRESS: 60 C 1,t.Tr/v DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: /, 4vyv{ ►fi& eplatil7g 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering by: 0 Fire: by: Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: iteizatelor • "7 i•-•*-_ c-Lie:c.c..1.e-1 / "e 42 1 / 5 -- Z. e-.... 744 J - / iea 74:77-‘ /e-o-fri. I-1, 7-( Wea"c-7.67' roee-i--e 7' a hi,...z.e__/ _4270 a z4 .■"? GA?r, "es • . c_- e e .2" eel ..,e, iew /4" . 4 '-et--54(32-tr %4Ecate iffetz - Oef.-_ses dio ze6v,,) 2:75. 4,,Y7 ;41 Za h ‘C* '"S74 •P■tiece_J_(- 4c) / a / Ztlr % / 45" _ 7.._ atssa/ge c/ts /4" 3 ern-47 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 February 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: Dick Williams, Offi a Engineer FROM: Gary Crutchfie • !'s ,"stant Planner SUBJECT: Environmental Review: Burke Warehouse Please review the attached Environmental Checklist with specific respect .to the increased use of South 143rd Place. I will appreciate any comments being returned to me by Tuesday, 14 February 1978. GC /ch Attachment 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177 • CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: 3i,vt/h..L WgJW,/t- od-S�- PROJECT ADDRESS: .ov7r1 /4-5 42,U- 50jk121-1-071778 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: Planning: Z/q (e7- (iYdit ea Police: by: DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: /PP* A446/ ;i J - (/% /o'gA -). )#H4(( 0.1.(447k-him- . CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50,00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs'of the'threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND I. Name of Proponent: 176,c1..16..H 4 COtJ,E.T. kac. .�,•,� Wo Lrek ) 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent:- t3oq c 1.4 =. 1R/>. 5. e %/&. cit ES O C=.-; 2. S - "141 t Co 3. Date Checklist Submitted: , 01 1.T1 F) 4. Agency. Requiring Checklist: �i�� oc u�� 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): t e--A . 0' X 8Q' x 20 ' 4114. LA G Wr -V c-112-E- ti( t 4v C C)c.c5 jZ aiT v sj c? AL.s 1..66.1.z3i*c) S.� 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under - standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): 1. Lc C 4. — ap 11y 1 I i 0L) T Q.1 $1.2D4 */ r t--L- 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 4pz. L .m) I9--ig 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the .Proposal (federal, state and loc'al): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NOV' (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES v/ NO (c) Building permit YES ;AO (d) .Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f). Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO / YES V/NO YES ' NO V/ YES V/ NO r */rG‘if 0i YES , NO U YES NO YES ;/NO YES ✓NO 10. Do you have any plans for . future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: t■lo 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal.? If yes, explain: ac, 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? ✓ (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? • (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in groundwater quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Aossowp --ion a1L�A coY R-CE o f3` ) $Loci \ IAti'rEre. s4 c=1/4 LL. • DR 4.1 )4. TC) sT \bAc i 's�Ot�C 17)S 1-1-E, 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora.into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? ( ) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: t?L -/ otic s ►-rte pAre- ►cL►.LteN ��Q�►►z►�.D. YES MAYBE NO 1 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities., including roads? (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a). Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: E1IE -r R. C:t-r \Nr izr_q FcDR- Ltc�Tr�1c 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the ,lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. ,„ a -- 0Qt... &e) 78 Signature and Title Date 8K808 Rod(p?4 os .4 RECEIPT' Date_ Received From A a v im. , •978 . 9015 iA. �� . . Address / 36-Z D oJ. Af).--1 0.1A---ft: cro /l1?J -Dollars Se,eie) For. C, c.0 ACCOUNT HOW PAID AMT. ON ACCOUNT . CASH ' By AMT.. PAID 4aola CHECK BALANCE :: DUE MONEY ORDER 8K808 Rod(p?4