The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-54 - AFFILIATED AMERICAN CORPORATION - COTTAGE CREEK TOWNHOUSESCOTTAGE CREEK TOWNHOMES 62AVS&S 153ST EPIC -FD -54 Affiliated American Corporation City of Tukwila 6200 SouthCenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98188 t'i "t f .:e1 -y Enclosed please find a copy of the Notice of Action by -the City of - Tukwila regarding the 48 unit condominium project Affiliated American Corporation is planning to construct at 62nd Ave. S. and S. 153rd, Tukwila, Washington (S.E. corner of intersection). We are forwarding this Notice to you in accordance with the S.E.P.A. requirements. Pub- lication dates are as follows: ~t F "' Record Chronicle - Legal Publications Section - lst.Publication, June 25th, 1978, 2nd Publication, July 2nd, 1978. • Should you have any questions about our project, please give us a call. We would be happy to discuss it with you. Larry N. Blake President LNB /kp Encl. One Lake Bellevue Building, Suite 210, Bellevue,Washington 98005 / (206) 455 -9710 NOTICE OF ACTION BY CITY OF TUKWILA Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, notice is hereby given that: The City of Tukwila. did on June 13, 1978, take action which may or may not be held or deemed to be "a major action significantly. affecting the quality of the enviroment ". Any action set aside, enjoin, review or otherwise challenge such action on the grounds of noncompliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Enviromental Policy Act) shall be commenced within thirty (30) days or be barred. The action taken by the City of Tukwila, notice of which is hereby given, was as follows: 1) Issued Building Permit The subject action encompasses a project for which additional' permits may be required. This notice is intended to encompass all further permits that may be required, including, but not limited to, plumbing permits, electrical permits, and occupancy permits. 2) Property'legally described as follows: Lot 16, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to Plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington. 3) Said action pertained to property commonly known as the property lying in.the S.E. corner of the intersection of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd, Tukwila, Washington all contained in said Lot 16, Interurban Addition to Seattle. 4) Pertinent documents may be examined during regular business hours at the office of: City of Tukwila Building Department 6200 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, Washington AFF IATED AME•'C' a.I. \ORATION _0\ `. By: Larry N. Blake, President 22 May 1978 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Phil Frick c/o Affiliated American Crop. One Lake Belleuve Bldg. Suite 210 Belleuve, Washington 98005 RE: WITHDRAWAL OF DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Dear Mr. Frick: Enclosed please find a copy of the withdrawal of the Declaration of Significance on your proposed 48 -unit residential complex at 62nd Avenue and South 153rd Street in Tukwila. Please be advised that this withdrawal is conditioned upon the faithful . execution of the stipulations enumerated.in the original declaration of significance and as mitigated in letter dated 16 May 1978 from Lawrence Braund. In addition, Ordinance #508 and attached developer's agreement must be implemented. as determined by the Public Works Department. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call.. Respectful)y, . ed atterstrpm Planning Supervisor FNS /ch cc: OCD Dir File L. Braund 6230 Southcent:er Boulevard U Tukwila, Washington 98188 m (206) 242 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WITHDRAWAL-OF-DECLARATION OF- SIGN I FICA "IC Description of proposal Cottage Creek Townhouses Proponent Affiliated American Crop. Location of Proposal 62nd Ave. So. & So. 153rd St. Lead Agency CITY OF TUKWILA File No. EPIC - FD -5 .This proposal has been determined to f+ /not have) a significant adverse.im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (-s /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development 5/19/78 Signature S� COMMENTS: Per revised drawings and letter dated May 16, 1978 mitigating impacts. • JOHNSON — BRAUND DEIGN G OOJP' PS.,P c ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS LAWRENCE 5. BRAUND, P.E. THOMAS A. JOHNSON, ARCHITECT May 16, 1978 Mr. Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development City of Tukwila Tukwila, WA 98188 1 O.C.D. CITY OF TUMI1A NAY 1 8 1978 RE: Cottage Creek Townhouses Our Project: #78 -14 SUBJECT: Reply to Comments of the PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE, dated 15 May 1978 Dear Mr. Stoknes: We wish to take this opportunity to reply to the comments listed on the PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE. Comment #1 Erosion during construction activities Reply: We believe this item to be explained satisfactorily by the engineering drawings which were previously submitted showing an interim drainage plan and me- thods to reduce on site erosion and run -off. Comment #2 Noise levels during construction on adjacent resi- dential lands Reply: During construction, noise generated by that acti- vity will be limited to the hours 7 A.M. to 5:30 P.M. in the summer (daylight savings time period), and the hours 8 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. in the remainder of the year (standard time period). Comment #3 Change in water absorption rates Reply: This office has revised the storm drainage collec- tion system to show both perforated drywells at the catch basins and perforated pipe between t— h catch basins. P.O. BOX 3586, 35717 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SO., FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 TACOMA 927 -5604 SEATTLE 623 -5732 Mr. Kjell Stoknes Page Two May 16, 1978 The perforated pipe and drywells will allow per -. colation of the storm water back into the pervious sands on the site. Ground water recharge will occur during rainy periods. The drainage system proposed will reduce the volume of runoff due to the new im- pervious surfaces of this project to a volume lower than that effected by direct discharge. We sincerely hope the above replies to the comments are satis- factory. If any additional questions arise, please do not hesi- tate to contact us. Very truly yours, JOHNS! :•AUND D : GN GROUP, P.S., INC. Lawree':'-aund , P.E. abt Enclosures cc Mr. Phil Frick, Vice President Affiliated American Corporation CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED/ DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ lRki11U.ylianI Description of proposal Cottage Creek Townhouses Proponent Location of Proposal. Lead Agency ■1�.�lreup,�:, Affiliated American Corp. 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street City of Tukwila File N EPIC This proposal has been determined to have pact upon the environment. An EIS is( ��) a significant adverse im- pact This decision was made after review y agency a.?co completed environmental checklist and other . information on file with the lead agency. 1 Responsible Official Position /Title Date 15 May 1978 Kell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development Signature COMMENTS: The significant environmental affects are: 1. Erosion during construction activities:j. '2. Noise levels during construction on adjacent residential lands. 3. Change in water absorption rates. If it can be demonstrated that the above can be mitigated, this affirma- tive declaration ofsignificance will .be reversed. `NOTE: Ordinance 508 and attached developer's agreement will be required to be implemented as determined by.the Public Works Department. 1 TU WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance' amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tukwila and reclassifying certa in property from R -3 to R -4. 1. WHEREAS, the Owners of the following described property have petitioned the Planning Commission- for • an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan requesting reclassification of. said property from R -3 to R -4; and 2. WHEREAS, public hearings on said petition were held before the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Tukwila and.the.City Council having received a :Favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to the aforementioned petition; • and 3. WHEREAS, the Owners of said property have executed a Property Use and Development Agreement in favor of the City of Tukwila which has been filed with the City and which is .made by reference a part of this Ordinance; and 4. • WHEREAS, the City Council finds the covenants and conditions entered into by the Owners of the said property in said Property Use and Development Agreement are for the protection and benefit of the public generally and the public welfare-in particular; and 5. WHEREAS, the City Council finds the subject reclassification to be within the public health, safet and general welfare, . NOW, THEaEFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila do ordain as follows: The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Tukwila is hereby amended to include the following described real property, by planning the use of said property to be low apartments, and the following described real property is hereby classified as R-4 in accordance with Ordinance No. 251 of the City of Tukwila, as amended, and the City Council hereby adopts the attached map showing said classification for the following described real property: "Tract 16, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to Plat thereof recorded in Vol. 10 of Plats, page 56, records of King County, Washington." The City Clerk is directed to file a copy of this Ordinance and map with the City and County Auditor. PASSED by the City Council of the City 'of Tukwila this day of February, 1968. Attest: Clerk Approved as to Form: Attorney -7 z/C • APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Tukwila, Washington, this day of February, 1968. . •layor, City. of Tukwila r _ -- YY' Z 3 1 fi ' t. _.. .: ti't' - +-.•mss :•4 a -_�;,; ..,._: • . • f exe • th_is date i ' favor of the City O f Ta�ailaP._a*naicin •-- _ al. orgoration.: (herein:_ called "City ") , by Mrs.. L. N. Wing ate ..(herein -• celled "O' ree) . • WITNESSETE: the., `ewwner.-in• fee• simple of the follow- ing described property,, :hereinafter called "the.Property ": "Tract 16,. Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to plat thereor•recorded in Vol. 10 of Plats, -page 55, records of. King County, Washington," located in Tukwila, King County, Washington; and . WHEREAS, Owner' has filed a petition to rezone the property to R -4; and - W fEREAS,. the City Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council that the. property be rezoned only upon execution of La Property Use and Development Agreement, substantially in the for hereof, herein called "Agreement" and that otherwise the petition should be denied; now, therefore, 1. in the event the'City finds that reclassification of the property to R -4 is within the public health, safety and general welfare, and subsequently rezones the property to R -4; then the Owner in consideration thereof and for so long as the property remains so classified, hereby covenants, bargains, arid agrees to the following Covenants and conditions, on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns: (a) To deed, without cost and Without.reserv,ation or restriction, to the City of Tukwila a strip of land 20 feet in width along the north boundary of the pro- perty to provide for the widening of South 153d Street to a standard street width of fifty feet along with sufficient land to- provide a radius.curve at the South- west corner of the property; and to improve said 153d • Street along the north boundary of the property to • • � invalid or void, such invalidity or voicness shall ( • - • ' • • • „.- .a • - : • •-2- •-••• • 't • -;•• r- - - ' • •-• . • ii•-:, - . . . . :-.:'‘.:„..-... no- way affect:ny- othe=.7Covt,n *-s p conditiona • • herein 'contained. . , •- IN W —MTESS WHERSOF, this agreement is executed this . • _ . -'/-f... day of - --,. .. : . -z.:.,„e ..;f:;"1:t„S"1•-■72 OP WA-1:4i.ZIV74 ' '"Q - ' `..7 -. --•'• • .. r • . ...-!. .: .. ---. - , ..7.:2-1.;:.„-'..'7.1,..._-.::,-,:;:.f....: '.:: ;.7.-,i..;,:',:,.,s.,.i.. : .- 7 • . Z • .;,-7. : ...,..r. . . . -.., - • - . . - ' — ' -. '..--.,..-,•".‘' • • . ......._.i.._.„..___,_...:...i. : .. brai- 3,:ei-6......_ ee.,a-s i." ,..t.,... - ..:.---,.. DI V..,,,,..->••7...<";.:.7.7-;,...A.4.1.17r1.. .rita vrit:375.a.ncraTld iffi::ed my onicial a.:2.1. cla. Jay in yt:a. :4 t ii i ,., , at Tukwila, Washington. - • • - - b.. • - - - Irk} for the St.nr of WasSinzton. r::.!;einz .t.Seattli -1. • f. • . r,:->d tor bt‘‘.,.:r3 1:9,10/ 5? tar,- 10..z-graq ROaER■ A. • = • . , • ; • • RECEMZD O.C.D. CITY OF TU'aA --pr,v14/44)miA4V 1/60-64 _14,A5 &rpt s 74 4/ I) 641-14;146/44444__ p4 MAY- 1 1 1978 • 7e-z-Lfrt /71)21 4,k4 s. riiALS AAAA) yttibv e- A45 e4444 0444-1-a4 A-C-10 ite.,5 I a 6 (Ye4k kfracklA/1,-. e41/7)-k 104/ ‘/,tf/14/ • P-tai k ii.frteAseet- .121_,w4-6,(.1 - T- _iii-'‹ 2 - / I At— fri-d44:14(--pi-e-el -i, E-41-3 501?-144— ivZt, Ada ,44.-4---0-5- 4,_da4 /f _ ,.44—is 6#1,1411Yeb-1 144,14-1 A.112c., 642__e4444,124_ $ _ / - ka,V LY16) 4,4114 - itt-ZVAr _ _ ittLL Aa.,-cc 6-6t _,5R,/- -4/€4441-sa- 94,x3-be; 141toui4 44-1- ai---45e-azh4.5 ai4-f- . rirz edALT- ,Gibt_.44.-V`3 910 t//4- j1/45-7 ;e-G5/74-4-,C4 ptiyi 6L0-0-t Z41 LA J,14,t/- rtyrf 1 ;t/tme,ez-44—, • • _ . IMOV%r- Z7 /S1 5. -4-' GN/ u vsl,), 6 tke?,5 % 3/44-;71- tv-la 4<S }111,4;,6: �Slf� n'1' - - - - -- — - .y_eea -cam Lion/lie-AY ..„--•_•• =•.-''!c,-!•..'-- ';; i • itA:e.ef Au. 3 {€40 /14.<0X1144aM ihitagA 1 UAW 4 t/14-5 1 it 4 I : . 4[ - A!. 144) i' bl/14114 dmde 444.-rY e44, 6r,4-- -s'i iii/ 1 vg4 dqt 4.ek__Yr_ad1io.n --.i/i/i;s . ,i-:‘,e1"- rva n & 4 4 4 3 /11 pusL 1te-4-e-- Le.A it.- afai A s , C 1;14 tik- 4=11 fli h/Ltxth - 1-14- 4144'0-141 L 4- -Pfigigialk irD era44 1 • ow164- dv---4-- IA -degimeket- A-4i° Aed- 0.-ic-064-s-.-- ,...1_ i € - o i 6 -e 4.444 ir elle, ) i 4-- it ttIatikk- 0.1- So ri1/4— 1 6 5c/rid-1- Att.A. /2._ -et a os= pyvittsx 14_, bao dGefiliA5r UM.-/ 14)014 `114L 4110111114.444A-1._tiSz- ____6 "-Li AA-044 fi", dee.0-144-4-- 7- i3 74 6- i/k):41 /it Abt ---- /4 4) so e- 424. isti-4.--ot 4.- XNA.A,44 j6 6 01-ek 1) -CENAT YkArkfAatiz. &YD.5411 of .114_4-__IkrA,_ tri0311,1Aviv 4u/121144 intiA,Itt4A1 rozertibwit- 41) ii4A4) 41A-L-- kit% 60440-444.- ovt. . ..t$r jt2_) Nriktak oli2linais,4"-thei,tes je 6a447 vr-41-PIAA-1414 i44-67'Y 4e1,1 _3) 17/1/piu4I e- c V6/ s #644 •td- • ! I evL. Jodik vg 6 TO: FROM: SUBJECT L 1Z1,1144--- 1 OFigtE MEMO CITY of KWILA S /3T yf Ls La tve)Ps OFFitE MEMO CITY of TUKWILA ape TO: /Q FROM: SUBJECT. 6 L.41_4 jo_ Alt44-- N1114-`-- 441/1441 . - OFOLE MEMO CITY of TUKWILA 5/3/7 8 TO: -p' w, FROM: (� 441114.- 0 l'al i 1 e 1 :1-44 1 i i ( * e j '''' L- el pi 44.-7 446(4414144) ' C l S!Dd Al 4 ,Ge7 d /474 `,v Q cam%-/o,c., % r� ,, . / 7fD"�� ti et -7 ,572?-4.)c / ..-ic / i1' �„sa . /s-3 aoZ . S`1ov/o/ % /m� .- ov+cd, Tie.. Go.Ci.S77^eda4oAd /ail 42 ca % d 4o r /a-3 '---4. a lyl,&e s ,lio -- GVZo.rJ -°, G vY4 v •i- Ol/G' . G!GK$ D Y %'Gsd l vu q %.5", e d ar�.vee /94'-a ,64 a- 71 6z d E'' /,�3 :_5! -<./5/7.V ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS LAWRENCE S. BRAUND, P.E. THOMAS A. JOHNSON, ARCHITECT May 1, .1978 Mr. Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner Office of Community Development Tukwila, Washington 98188 SUBJECT: Additional.data requested for the Environmental Impact Checklist on the Cottage Creek Townhouses Dear Mr. Crutchfield: The information you requested on 24 April 1978 to supplement our EIC on the Cottage Creek Townhouse proposal follows: 1. Earth: Those areas proposed as sites for buildings, drive -. ways and parking stalls will be cleared in preparation for on site improvements. The area of clearing is 105,700 square feet (2.43 acres). The volume of cut is estimated to be 4,900 cubic yards. The volume of fill is estimated to be 3,000 cubic yards. Approximate y 900)cubic yards of earth may be exported from the site. _ / r Discussions with the construction management firm which has been retained by our Client indicate that the export of earth from the site will be held to a minimum. Berms and other landscaping features will accomodate much of this ex- cess cut material. There are numerous people interested in any excess cut material which may be available. It is the opinion of the construction manager that the material can be disposed of within five (5) miles of the project should an excess be available. 2. Utilities: The owner will extend utilities (sanitary and storm sewers and water mains) at his expense. No funds will be required from the City of Tukwila. Construction and extension of these utilities will involve the use of standard, acceptable construction practices based upon an engineering design acceptable to the City of Tukwila. The equipment involved will most likely be as follows: P.O. BOX 3586, 35717 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SO., FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 TACOMA 927 -5604 SEATTLE 623 -5732 Page Two Mr. Gary Crutchfield May 1, 1978 a) Tractor mounted backhoe with a front end loader for trench excavation. b) Dump trucks for the import of bedding material, where required, for the installation of the sewer and water lines. c) A rubber -tire front end loader for backfilling ditches. d) Additional equipment such as barricades, lights, flag- men and compaction equipment. 3. Streets: The City of Tukwila, based upon the 1968 zoning agreement with the previous owners, requires the dedication of 20 feet and the improvement, by widening, of South 153rd Street. This existing street runs in an east -west direction along the north line of the subject property. The agreement states, "(a) To deed, without cost and without reservation or restriction, to the City of Tukwila a strip of land 20 feet in width along the north boundary of the property to provide for the widening of South 153rd Street to a standard street width of 50 feet; and to improve the south one -half of said 153rd Street along the north boundary of the property to City of Tukwila standards for a 50 foot wide street, including but not limited to filling, grading, paving and drainage of said street." To widen South 153rd Street to City of Tukwila standards will require the construction of a 16 foot wide asphalt driving lane (in addition to the existing pavement), storm drainage improvements, extension of the existing culvert at the bottom of the .ravine, placement of approximately 600 cubic yards of fill, compaction of the fill, and hydroseeding and /or land- scaping of the fill slope. Although not mentioned in the 1968 agreement, the owners will have to supply to the City of Tukwila a slope easement for the fill area because it will extend southerly into the sub- ject property. The construction sequence involved for the improvement of, South 153rd Street would be generally as follows: a) Remove all existing trees, brush, debris, etc. adjacent to the street in order that compaction can be obtained between the existing ground and the fill which is nec- essary to widen the street. • Page Three Mr. Gary Crutchfield May 1, 1978 b) Extend the existing culvert by cleaning and grading the creek bed for approximately 35 feet. The cul- vert extension will be an 18 inch diameter corruga- ted metal pipe (CMP). It is expected that the work required for the culvert extension will have to be done by hand, due to its location. c) A new catch basin will have to be installed adjacent to the southerly pavement line in order to divert the drainage on the street into the creek. d) Along the southerly edge of the newly paved street a beam guard rail will be installed for safety pur- poses. This guard rail will be a Type I as recom- mended by the Washington State Department of High- ways. A copy of the detail is attached. e) Paving will be two inches of Class "B" asphaltic concrete over a prepared sub -base of crushed rock. f) The slope which results from the addition of the fill will be hydroseeded in order to lessen, as much as possible, any erosion. It is our recommendation that construction concerned with the widening of South 153rd Street should occur during the driest portion of the construction period, preferably from mid -July till September. When complete, the Cottage Creek development will generate some 270 to 290 vehicle trips per weekday. During each morning and afternoon peak hour, some 30 to 45 vehicle trips will be gener- ated. Locally, the traffic should be divided about equally between South 153rd Street and 62nd Avenue South; however, the new city hall being constructed to the south may cause greater use of South 153rd Street by residents of the site to avoid congestion on 62nd Avenue South and at the junction of 62nd Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard. Very truly yours, JOHNSON - BRAUND DESIGN GROUP, P.S., INC. vair W. Tom Hall abt attachment 9 0 Se •1 7/0" Hole(Typ.) • TYPE 1 & 8 Ports and Blotks Moy B. 8" all" Treated Timber or W6 a 8.5 Ooly. Steel Unless Olhorwite Noted. Treat•,l Timber Posts May B. • 54S or Rough Sawn. 7/8" Hol•)Typ.) • 5/8 "Carrag• Boll with Hex Nut and Cut Washer TYPE 2 13'•61/2" 2 -Jar�>• sr, ti 12 pop• --t __ 4 1(4" 1/4" m-4 L. 2' 29/32 "x 1 1/8" Bolt Slot Z3/4" a 2 1/2" Post Boll Slot 15/16 —R RAIL ELEMENT C TYPE 3 n • \ I 31/37" --1 RAIL WASHER 2 5/16" 3 1/4" 1 1/8L 3 1/4" 4.15/16"..1,, 12 1/4 SECTION THRU RAIL ELEMENT 3" 11/2" 11/2" 8 Gage (0.164) Min. 1/4" Plot•■ s - x b L POST BOLT WASHER . (Snow load •oth•r. 5e• Noses) TYPE 4 7/0" Hole 11/16" Holes WO a 17 Brldo• Deck Grout Additional details Included on bridge alone for oath sp•clflc location. TYPE 5 -With Chann•I Roll (s•• Type 3 for details) TYPE 6 • Without Channel Roll Poet 11/16". 2" Slot In Channel ond- Splic• Plate for 5/8" Carnage Ball with Nex Nut and e 11/4" Plate Cul Washer Q . Post Connection \_ -tx-1/4" -- o N � r 1' - -1 3 /4' 1 5/8" 1 5 /B" 11/2 "-.. x- 11/16" Holes for 5 /8" Carrag• Boll with He• Nut CHANNEL RAIL SPLICE Type 1, 2, 7 6 8 Roll: 5 /8" Canape Boll wills Roll Washer, Cut Washer and He■ Nut Type 3. 4, S 6 6 Roll: 5/8" Carrag* Boll, or 5/8" Rod Threaded bosh •nd,, with 2•Rail Washers and Hea Nut, W8 a 17 Block S /8 "a 11/4" Button Head Split• Boll with 0.21" Ovol Orip and R d Hex Nut. Screw slot or milled wr•nch shoulders In boll hood optional ASSEMBLY DETAILS' 5/16 SECTION A -A Design B Counterweight (2 reaulred at •oils post) No. 4 R•inf. Bar 2 1/2 "R Splice Clair 8 Concr•1• 6" a B" 545 Post 7 1 / 2 "--wi 7 2" a 6" 16d Nails i1 tJ 0 3/4" if Hol• for Balix 8" lop soil Design A Counterw•ight 2.burlap Bags each tilled with 100 lbs. Mln•ral Sand 1 "x6 "a1 %0 "Scab 4,•0" 30d Splkee 6" a 6" S45 TYPE 7 NOTES: When epecifl•d In the Special Provisions, a 4" a 4" x r /." plot* washer am shown hereon shall be used In lieu of the standard 1'/." diam- eter post boll washer on Type 1 and Type 2 beam guard roil. Guard Roll Pod Spacing: Type 1 thru 6 = 6' -3" on centers Type 7 and 8 = 11'-6" on canters A tolerance of 3 percent on any dimension of the roll *lemon, will be ol. lowed. •Shown for timber post and block. Similar for steel poet ond block, except for location of carriage bolt. STANDARD Washington State Department of Highways 1974 Edition OFWE MEMO CITY o� /T�JKWILA l ?, TO: r:/(C- FROM: SUBJECT: __ '� RI t Au. AteAu.L., 4)44,0k i/urcie-A_ s .7/ ,4-/ If 9, /0 tf/ IsidO Pum4:41- Irdia+5. X0/6/t Civix fivie4) tter;, w/d1 CITY_ OF TUKWILA EIV,Cratairl ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM dy > 414/7?)t PROJECT NAME: (fl E GA IL '1"C1AiKi -M05E5 PROJECT ADDRESS: 0-4 swat I S3'1 DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 3 ri / 197! 1. DEP4RTENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) Building: q--/"-- 7f by: CLe .-b) ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: a ,rfLa i a-2 SEES Pro.) s (44444.. atA.(ekil ter AT 7E--33 . • CITY. OF, TUKWILA fikj5TiI3UTIOki • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM 61d,9 > 11411 Fi ye. •PROJECT NAME: CprSE" c.e.Ezy_ i-40050 PROJECT ADDRESS: 62,4 ku.,"( .1S3d. DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:. 3 Apri 117 g 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) 0 Building: by: XEngineering: a7t14-4( ---/97E. by: 0 Fire: by: C] Planning: • by: C3 Police: by: 2. • ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: / /r/e ex> Te..4.emee. aw--0/ =7/17/9tove rifel. 74 otrot xra die rwere..m•-c=1/ . zie.ed C7-ru A.,(; cizv,47 Vta,' GtitAit kitit&i4)64-M'Ar eal4A-4"- (du! cv artui ave/frs-e-- PA/wwat plAi4,4x-C 14 4tA .4•0t-ct ee.//./ /■(...14.r-p77.7713/.; 1110 CITY OF TUKWILA 4F1'IrrElarriCki ENV I RONMENTAL QUEST 1 ON;‘11; I RE REV I EW FORA > etlef „Ag( PROJECT NAME: CS-LIME CEEEV- -TOtAhk14461)50 PROJECT ADDRESS: (p)Lg itudt IS:3)1 DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 3 April 117g 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) 0 Building: by: 0 Engineering: by: Fire: d— 7 by: 0 Planning: by: 0 Police: by: (reviewer) 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: Oh-rvi al-4- 00 PLANNING PARKS & RECREATION BUILDING 24 April 1978 • CITY of TUKWULA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Tom Johnson Johnson - Braund Design Group P.O. Box 3586 Federal Way, Washington 98003 RE: Environmental Checklist for Cottage Creek. Townhouses Dear Mr. Johnson: Initial review of the Environmental Checklist for the Cottage Creek project in Tukwila has been completed. Additional information is deemed necessary as follows: 1. Earth: Areas to be cut and /or filled; quantification of cuts and fills; site of exported earth, if any. 2. Utilities: Describe method of utility extension (sanitary and storm sewers and water). 3. Streets: Describe improvements to South 153rd Street, including general construction methods and vehicular use (volume and peaks). Please provide the information requested at your earliest convenience. We are unable to determine the significance of the project in its absence. Should Jsu have any questions, please call me. Sinc:y^-ly, Ga y Crut hfield Assistant Planner GC /ch cc: Dir, OCD Assoc Plnr Bldg Off 6230 Southcenter Boulevard u Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (206) 242 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Affiliated American Corp. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: One Lake Bellevue Building Suite 2102 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 455 -9710 3. Date Checklist. Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila, Planning Dept. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Cottage Creek Townhouses 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors, that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Multi - family residential development of 48 units - 8 duplex units and 40 two bedroom townhouses and parking` stalls for 96 vehicles and driveways. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Southeast corner of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street. The lot is 4.71 acres of brush, deciduous trees and some evergreens on slopes on either side of a creek which drains an upland marsh north of the site. One residence stands on the southwest corner of the site. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Ma rrh 1g7q 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government.Approvals Required for. the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES X NO__�_ • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit .YES X NO (f) Sign permit YES X NO (g) Water hook up permit YES X NO (h) Storm water system permit YES X NO___ (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or father activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil ?, (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X X X e,V6ax"�'.STvS�+i+b55?•aP. S'.++H• w �+:' .. �.L�1.4 " "4iil= v- t'.`�e'n..ln�.� yFe.i...w _..en �4r>ri P:tv 1,1 •yet -•11, • • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X Grading and excavation will be required to situate units on slopes and to provide parking. Temporary erosion may occur during construction. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) The creation of objectionable odors? _ (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? — X Explanation: The vehicle -trips generated by the proposal will contribute a small amount of pollution to the ambient air. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X — (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (9) -3- X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or/bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X Explanation: Coverage of about 40% of the site with impermeable surfaces will reduce absorption rates on the site and increase the rate of runoff. Storm water drainage facilities will be used to restrict the latter to rates standard for the area be- fore construction. Temporary measures will be implemented dur- ing construction to reduce sediment in the creek, but some 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: sediment may occur. (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: The proposal would eliminate about 50 percent of the natural vegetation and replace some of it with domesticated shrubs and grasses. X 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: The proposal would eliminate some 50 percent of the habitat for wildlife on the site 'and expose the re- mainder to regular human access. -4- 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO Traffic on nearby roads and freeways is likely to mask most noise caused on the site after completion. During construction a temporary increase will occur which would exceed traffic noise. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: Residential and utility lighting will be noticeable chiefly from the street; Elevation and vegetation will reduce the affect of new lighting on residences to the east of the site. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Presently the site has a single- family residence on its southwest corner. The present zoning is consis- tent with the proposed development. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Generation of additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? Impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: The proposal is likely to generate some 270 vehicle - trips on an average weekday. South 153rd Street and 62nd Ave- nue South need improvement to safely handle current . traffic and this need will be magnified, by the proposed development. A small increase in the use of public transportation may also result from the proposal. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: in: YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X Fire protection ?. Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X 0 The proposal will cause'minor increases in the present demands for public services and.also com- pensate for those increases with taxes. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Demand. upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: Demand upon existing electrical supplies will increase slightly. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in new systems, or alterations following utilities: Power or natural gas? Communications systems? Water? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: a need for to the X X Lk_ ) X 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist -. ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. /1M• 3/, l vo Signatur= and Title Date -8- X X X • CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Affiliated American Corp. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: One Lake Bellevue Building Suite 210, Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 455 -9710 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila, Planning Dept. 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Cottage Creek Townhou§e.s 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Multi- family residential development of 48 units - 8 duplex units and 40 two bedroom townhouses and parking` stalls for 96 vehicles and driveways. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Southeast corner of 62nd Avenue South and South 153rd Street. The lot is 4.71 acres of brush, deciduous trees and some evergreens on slopes on either side of a creek which drains an upland marsh north of the site. One residence stands on the southwest corner of the site. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Ma7,cr 1g7q 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES X NO • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO (f) Sign permit YES X NO (g) Water hook up permit YES X NO (h) Storm water system permit YES X NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? X (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- X X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: X Grading and excavation will be required to situate units on slopes and to provide parking. Temporary erosion may occur during construction. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? -(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: X The vehicle -trips generated by the proposal will contribute a small amount of pollution to the ambient air. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X _ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X -3- (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus orlbacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X Explanation: Coverage of about 40% of the site with impermeable surfaces will reduce absorption rates on the site and increase the rate of runoff. Storm water drainage facilities will be used to restrict the latter to rates standard for the area be- fore construction. Temporary measures will be implemented dur- ing construction to reduce sediment in the creek, but some 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: sediment may occur. (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: The proposal would eliminate about 50 percent of the natural vegetation and replace some of it with domesticated shrubs and grasses. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 1 Explanation: The proposal would eliminate some 50 percent of the habitat for wildlife on the site and expose the re- mainder to regular human access. -4- 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Traffic on nearby roads and freeways is likely to mask most noise caused on the site after completion. During construction a temporary increase will occur which would exceed traffic noise. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: Residential and utility lighting will be noticeable chiefly from the street. 'Elevation and vegetation will reduce the affect of new lighting on residences to the east of the site. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? -X_ Explanation: Presently the site has a single- family residence on its southwest corner. The present zoning is consis- tent with the proposed development. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X 11. Population. Explanation: • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO X X X x X X X Explanation: The proposal is likely to generate some 270 vehicle - trips on an average weekday. South 153rd Street and 62nd Ave- nue South need improvement to safely handle current . traffic and this need will be magnified by the proposed development. A small increase in the use of public transportation may also result from the proposal. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? • YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X Explanation: The proposal will cause minor increases in the present demands for public services and also com- pensate for those increases with taxes. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: Demand upon existing electrical supplies will increase slightly. X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X (b) Communications systems? X (c) Water? X (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X (e) Storm water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 1 • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. lhl l• 3/, /Vs Signatur6 and Title Date 152'/TEStc, ' -8- X x 230 Southcenter Blvd..' kwila, Washington 98067 Phone: (206) 242 -2177 • IcATION OF WORK / NUMBER & STREET i( JNEP. BLOCK AP'---g -33 SUBDIVISION IN1-ceUR6 AbDITioN TO 5 €T TLZ. ) Ac OI?DU & TO -r}}� PLAT g &O1D tN VDWVf. 10 ) ?p1/4G-E. s�� l N KING GO IJ'1't 16& A -ye AWIz1CAN COMWANW (DRESS CiiVe., 1I O - $U1Lb1N1& j SUITE. 210 �3�L L_Gv l W 1411vG 1001 ` ?) (Y ) lME OF BUILDER (DRESS CcA Cts aI7ove PHONE +55-9-110 STATE LICENSE NO. ?.2A- -..0I 07 RPIo SALES TAX NO. C. • Goo - 1Q 5 • cD %( 'HONE. 455. Tito. ViECEIVED ti ri OF T UKWILA J'Sali -19-18. dv1LDtNG t EM APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT DATE TODAY ESTIMATED VALUE 1 nn D d COMPLETED WORK $ Dl/� d PERMIT FEE ` $I PLAN CHECK FEE LATE PERMIT FEE A/� TOTAL FEE TYPE OF CONST. OCCUPANCY GROUP FIRE ZONE USE ZONE FIRE SPRINKLERS MAX. REQUIRED ❑Yes El No OCC. LOAD ESCRIPTION OF WORK: • ,: oo r >-' (40) , -4-w -o s�o 9 +ow n h o' s e on i �s Vor (4) bc,plexes 8 unibs ,ov-,j C1 ) 701-1\L UK\ (iS. N��w OF TEi A .JT ,!AT'URE OF BUSINESS: THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANY WORK IN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY OR ON UTILITY EASEMENTS. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NO WORK IS TO BE DONE EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IN APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT ALL WORK IS TO CONFORM TO TUKWIL�{A,, �CODES AND ORDINANCES. APPLICANT � �•rti�CY ((C�iivi�,J (0'�W/�? BY (Jni rctw 1 gib rzs 8i(808 Fodlfi,n, R C Ipi' Received From Addres For_ ACCOUNT AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PA /D BALANCE DUE CASH CHECK MCNEY ORDER Date i !AM HOW PAID 19 .1 ■ • ',aro 1U5 , Dollars $, Oka LOT 16, INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO TIIE PLAT RECORDED IN VOL- : UME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55',. IN KING. •COUNTY,.wASHIUGTOR 143 .: X144 . • FIRE ZONE SITE AREA TOTAL L'NITS TYPE A .; TYPE B DENSITY 'PARKING RATTCL PARKING PROVIDED ` PARKING, REOOIED . III ..4.71 ACRES 43' 8 •10.2 UNITS /ACRE 2:1 96 96 en v A 1 SITE' PLAN, .STATISTICS,. 8 4ICINITY MAP A 2 'TOWNHOUSE OMIT PLAN .WITII FLOOR 8 ROOF FRAMING, 'FOLINDATION,.ELEC. PLANS, 8 INT. ELEVATIONS_ A 3',FOUNDATION.PLANS - BUILDINGS A,-B, C A'4 FOUNDATION PLANS - BUILDINGS D, E, F, G TYPICAL STEPPED:FOUNDATION END WALL SLAB CONDITIONS a. PARTY. WALLS; ' REAR WALL FRAMING ' A.6 BUILDING SECTIONS, STAIR - SECTION, GENERAL NOTES,. SCHEDULES • A 7' DETAILS, WALL SECTIONS A'8, 1/8" BUILDING ELEVATIONS - BLDGS. A 8 B. •A 9 1/8 ".BUILDING ELEVATIONS - BLDGS. C, D: F, G. .A-10.1 /8" BUILDING ELEVATIONS - BLDG. E B" PARTIAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS A 11 ROOF FRAMING AND VENTILATION SCHEDULES - .BUILDINGS A, B, 8 C A 12 ROOF. FRAMING AND VENTILATION SCHEDULES - BUILDINGS D, .E, F, 8.G A 13 DUPLEX UNIT PLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FOUN • DATIOt1 PLAN, FLOOR FRAMING.- A 14 DETAILS,. BUILDING SECTIONS FOR DUPLEXES A'15•SCHEDULES GENERAL NOTES,. ROOF FRAMING, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR'DUPLEXES AS I / 104 • �_ -- _.rs +L t-; Joe ND. 78-14 DRAWN 724 \\\ \\ \ \ \� �•\ \ \. \� \ \;`• \�\ �`�: �..� 120.. 712 o / 70 0 0 g . 7to CHECKED. ISSUED APR /L /,.78 REVISED SHEET • cr:* ■ ?J.:ILL; I DRESSING. MO' R59) iguff. T. r EIS OD ktri GO DOWNSTA/RS FLOOR PLAN 598 sq. ft 1/4 0 'DECKI . 13,r. •ratiireranlin 1111$151161liftelfiln 1 " .1 Zer111731111111X03q2--MI $ S/DE ELEVAT/ON JOB NO. 76.-/4 DRAWN D CHECKED ISSUED -11, 'f 117b REVISED t442 SHEET • • 2 0 • L_ rrt c. STAGE C Whill USES //8" BLDG. ELEVAT /ONS TUKWILA , WASHINGTON SLOGS A,8 FOR AFF /L /ATED AMER /CAN CORPORAT /ON. BELLEVUE,: :WASH/NOT-ON 455-9T/0 LL NO /1VA373 1N0 - V 9N/07 ..il II 11 Ii. i1 JOHNSON - BRAUND DEMI MOW Pap Na PAD- 801: 3586, 35717 PACIFIC HIGHWAY 50. FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 TACOMA 927-5604 SEATTLE 623 -5732 ot TE H.L 11:01; .+■147, iA. ~0p11 M1CIwTECT Ls. MiAUN° EN GaW • SLOGS." C, a F/sim/1ar1- FRONT ELEVATION B7 /LD /NG G FRONT ELEVATION mo. ___ 111111 BLDG'S CIS F (simi /ar) -. REAR ELEVATION • - BJ /LD /NG G REAR ELEVATION) BULD /NG : D - FRO/VT ELEVATION JOB NO. 78 -14 CHECKED REVISED BUILDING D —REAR ELEVATION SHEET,,. BULD/NG E - -FRONT ELEVATION 11111111111 11111 1111111111111 liiiiiii BU /LD /NG E- REAR ELEVATION as■.l - anal manna mann Nam u - _ ■■■a ■ ■in uo A■■■etL. an■t_ ■.■...le■uii�■a.■e■n ..sse. ■■a■e■r.a.■s■.. esm►vnae■.. ■eos.n a■m�ie.uatm■au \.aril ■manam ■ ■Y<7111 MIIEHMIIHEMINIIIIMENIEHE .2 +S ARSc -2Ki0 �SJA' ,EDAV ;}°HCGLES Zra...n..(XAv 'pt'n • - 2)', N)',V TIM E:'.cRSON Y r. M ALL • 'J -01,J Ti S • • a'ddier- as 9 "" @. _.:a.es ■mta._ N. . . I ■ . . . . . . . . . .� � Imo! sI■mmiuma .aNI.as ■.....■\, .. i' da■aeaa■■ ■ ■ ■�.atHmaaaaaatsttt�, - +I.p -o" .■Intl ■■..■■ ■tam ■....■ ■. ■.. .. . l . .tt■ Cana■■. ■.■.■.a ..•..aia■aaaa■t■a■... ionnamaNuilmAnuammuummammuissiammumun at ■■ ■■alau.■aa ■ ■.■/■rLa■atn..■.t.�s..e ®aaaama. ■s. n a®■ra■ a.I.tRSaaas ..m. r ®�r/� ea ■....sss. ■.0... ■al.✓�.s.....■.l �■..■i m el a el I. 1� ■.O■ t■ ■aD;ta�a�. ■� ■aBt.■a..t. O.II�I a jl l [, ■r O ®.��aaaell•8a ®a.a0ia ®.�. ® r ■■tees..�a.�.a■um..a ■t■.at.■ s.. ar irMe.M■.aaal..■rela.■at■.� ■NINIr � ■ .� .. t.sa■■■■o....a.tt®■■.■■■ - ■. ■.. It — �eaa.oa.NIlr.... 5 lat .. i .. ...a ■NINIa�a.a�l Pao - - ea \ It so ea ■taa■.■...W... . ....rtnnnaorn ■� �i . ■.. ■ u nn0iwnsmaa 6.4..; ■ l R re ..f..a.■NIat. ■ ■Ir - - -�. UMW 1. eata.I.■atea.s..a1.NIu.r le le ■ u rr DRAWN . JOHN CHECKED- PART /AL FRONT ELEVATION PART/AL REAR ELEVAT /ON REVISED -