HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-55 - BSH INC - BSIP AND MULTI-TENANT INDUSTRIAL SPACEBSH INC
BSIP - UPLAND'S
INDUSTRIAL PARK
EPIGFD -55
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FfePeeEIVFINAL
DECLARATIOi1 OF SIG'sIFI-e(fcE /NON— SIGNIFICAdCE
Description of proposal BSIP and multi - tenant industrial space
Proponent BSH, Inc.
Location of Proposal Lot 4, Upland's Industrial Park
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -55
This proposal has been determined to (ire /not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS ( ./is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
. Responsible Official
Position /Title
Kjell Stoknes
Director, Office of Community Deveilopment
Date 5 June 1978 Signature.
COMMENTS: This declaration of non - significance is subject to the following
being completed prior to issuance of a building permit:
1. Condominium plat, if filed, to guarantee access from all
bui dings to a- p_ublic road.
2. Owners association created to provide means to maintain
buildings and grounds.
3. Site plan to show internal railroad crossings for vehicles
and method of separation of railroad tracks from parking
lot. This site plan is to be available at the next Plan-
ning Commission meeting for their review and approval.
CITY OF TUKWILA .
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: —
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
(N/ (XWaie /401400q2L
Lo ¢ l of
1/27/71
1. DEP RTfjENTAL REVIEW: (date)
Building: .3` / V7 by: ` .0)
Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
(reviewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
-
(t-E-e-rt-1 rt,7,
c4_,4_0/
�--
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS: GDS
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
CITY OF TUKWILA 610
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
i4te dusts
A
/4/2/7!
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date).
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by :.
)(Fire: 5 3 - 7 r by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
(reviewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
1 u fro vj d -f.
- PTAv a t
pi, to. a 71; 04, /.7L27 ed, 73O
4 /71-5 �-- c, 7 Qr1. -727;
P
PROJECT NAME:
• CITY OF TUKWILA
_
ENVIRO';MENTAL OUESTIOWIRE REVIEW FORM
44-&. (X5/Pe
PROJECT ADDRESS: Lp 4 / lifegeet hilaokki Ad-
(
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 4/; 7 /7I
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
XEngineering: 3 /1178 by: e� .__2
I 1 b :
❑ Fire: y
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
X'00.01 i6L4e_ e020,44244 _ .
���
• �G�O
24e
• CITY OF. TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL °QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
g 1/, ash a Notitaists
4 laid
4/;y7(r
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
%Planning: V9/1 k bY:
❑ Police: by:
(reviewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
guo
C1
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Bittman, Sanders, Hasson and Associates PS
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 406 Securities Building, Seattle,
WA 98101, 623 -2911
3. . Date Checklist Submitted: 4/3.7)(7r
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Planning Division - Office of Community Development
5 Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6514
6 Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Construction of an industrial park composed of 3 on -grade tilt -up warehouses
for manufacturer's representatives requiring small warehouse areas for their
goods. Only small delivery -type vans and trucks will be servicing the areas;
no arrangements will be made for the loading and unloading of road rigs. (Continued
7 Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as on attache
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- sheet.)
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of . the environmental setting of the proposal):
(see attached),
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal.: March 1979
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x
(c) Building permit YES x NO
ATTACHMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL. CHECKLIST FORM
I. 6. (continued) Office areas will be provided. The buildings will
be designed to be architecturally pleasing and the grounds will be
landscaped to enhance the structures. The total area of all three
buildings is 64,000 square feet. Parking for over 100 cars will be
provided.
7. The property is located on the north side of Upland Drive west of
Andover Park West and extends northward to a line 22.05 feet north
of the east-west rail easement. Its western line is 222 feet west
of turnaround; its east line is the centerline of the curved rail
spur separating Lots 3 and 4. The land is rather low and will be
raised with free - draining, compacted fill to maintain proper relation-
ship with top of rails and to provide proper site drainage. The legal
description is Lot 4, Upland's Tukwila Industrial Park. The area is
barren, except for a few clumps of grass and other nondescript vegetation..
(d) .Puget Sound Air. Pollution Control Permit
(e)
(f)
(9)
(h)
(i)
(J)
(k)
(1) Other:
Sewer hook up permit
Sign permit
Water hook up permit
Storm water system permit
Curb cut permit
Electrical permit (State of Washington)
Plumbing permit (King County)
•
YES N0�__
YES x NO
YES NO
YES x NO
YES x NO
YES x NO
YES x NO
YES x NO
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No
11.. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at'some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? x
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? x
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
x
x
•
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES. MAYBE NO
x
Explanation:
(b) There will be fill over entire site to bring area to level of top of
rails; buildings will be slightly higher to assure drainage away from
structures.
(c) Changes in topography and ground surface relief features changed to the
extent noted in statement above.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? x
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? x
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? x
Explanation: ,
(a) During construction period heavy equipment, gas or diesel., will affect
the air in the immediate vicinity. There could be some dust, but efforts
will be made to keep it to a minimum.
(b) Diesel or gas fumes may be offensive during this period:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a.) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body ?.
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3-
x
x
x
•
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters? x
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? x
Explanation:(b) A great percentage of the now vacant area will be covered
with buildings and blacktopped surfaces. This will affect absorption.
Run -off will be directed to storm drainage system.
(f) Surface waters will be directed to storm drain system for the most part.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:_
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
(c) Landscaping with trees, shrubs, and plants will be provided.
5 Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
YES MAYBE NO
) Explanation:
During period of construction the noise level will be increased by heavy
equipment operation. After completion there should be no more noise than
the normal noise in the area.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
Floodlights for parking areas will add extra illumination in the area.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
x
x
x
Explanation:
General warehousing may include some hazardous substances, but space will
not be leased or sold to a firm known to handle hazardous materials.
11. Population.
Explanation:
• YES MAYBE NO
Will the proposal alter the location,
•distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Generation of additional vehicular movement?
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
Impact upon existing transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
x
x
x
x
x
(a) On the basis of approximately 3 in and out movements for each vehicle
(other than trucks), this would mean approximately 600 vehicle trips a day
based on the 100+ parking spaces provided. However, many employees' cars
will not move all day. No large trucks are anticipated and no truckbed
loading docks wi]1 the provided- truck trims per day are difficult to predict
14. Public Services. Will t e proposa have an a ec upon, without knowledge of
or result in a need for new or altered tenants' businesses.
governmental services in any of the
following areas: (continued on attached
sheet)
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? -
-6-
x
x
ATTACHMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
II. 13. (b) Parking will be provided for 100+ cars, plus truck
stalls for each subdivision of warehouse.
• YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services?
Explanation:
If fire hydrant is.required on site proper, it will be provided.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
x
x
(a) Power or natural gas? _x
(b) Communications systems? x
(c) Water? x
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? x
(e) .Storm water drainage? x
(f) Solid waste and disposal? x
Explanation:
As for (a), (b), and (e), systems will be altered only to the extent
necessary to make necessary connections for our new structures.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
x
•
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
'19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
¢ /ice /76
Signature and Title Date
x
x
x
RECEIPT.
Received From •
Address
FOK. •
• Date
l9
Dollars $100. Ora
`ACCOUNT
HOW PAID
AMT.. OF—
ACCOUNT '
CASH:
AMT',, PAID
;BALANCE,.
CHECK'
V4
MONEY..
ORDER ' •
B\
8K6D8 Fe difirm
8XSD8 a= 00)3ra
V U
R ECE PT. Date. �.�. 39 7g
Received From —.4 .4 `%.. - ' 1 f 4 ■% ✓4 , i.
J
Address 4 i tr—a.. .4 , _
4
.� ! • • Dollars $ l.116
For
. ACCOUNT
HOW PAID
., .
. L
' AP,1T. OF,
ACCOUNT
CASH
,
By
By
AMT. PA 10
CHECK' "; .,
. '
BALANCE.''
DUE'
MONEY ,'
ORDER.. :.
,J
8XSD8 a= 00)3ra