HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-56 - GOEBEL ROBERT - SIZZLER RESTAURANTSIZZLER STEAK HOUSE
SOUTHCENTER PY
EPIC -FD -56
12 June 1978
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Al P er, Building Official
FROM: F N. Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor
SUBJECT: Si ler Steak House'
The following should be attached to the building permit for the Sizzler Steak
House as requirements of this office:
1. The five (5) parking stalls in the southwest corner of the property
shall be redesigned so as to fall in a straight line with those stalls
to the north.
2. That area lying west of the proposed retaining wall shall be left
undisturbed. Any area which may be affected during site grading
shall be planted with suitable groundcover.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not be construed to authorize the
location of the proposed sign.
4. A 5' -wide concrete sidewalk shall be provided along Southcenter
Parkway.
5. A 5' -wide planting strip shall be provided along the south property
line.
6. Construction of the retaining wall per soils report by Hart, Crowser
& Associates (J- 630).
FNS /ch
6230 Southcenter Boulevard a Tukwila, Washington 98188 u (206) 242 -2177
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMiERVFINAL
DECLARATION OF NON—S I Gil I F I CA dCE
Description of proposal
Proponent
Location of Proposal
Lead Agency
Sizzler Steak House (Building Permit)
Robert B. Goebel
Southcenter Parkway
City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -56
This proposal has been determined to (tom /not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS (46 /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Date 7 June 1978
Kjell Stoknes
Director, Office of Commu ity Development
'Signature
.. ter• _�� - - - --
COMMENTS:
Negative Declaration is issued contingent upon the proposed development of
the property as depicted on revised site plan dated 26 May 1978.
•
TELEPHONE 5 3 5 — 8 8 7 7
ROBERT B. GOEBEL- General Contractor, Eric-
‘
IY(Y\c. NORTH 715 HOGAN TERMINAL BOX 3086 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220
April 19, 1978
City of Tukwila
6230 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Attention: Gary Crutchfield, Assistant Planner
Re: Proposed Sizzler Steak House, Tukwila
Gentlemen:
RECEIVE!)
APR 2 0 1978
CITY OF iUKWILq
Reference to your letter of March 27, 1978 regarding questions arising
from your initial review of the Environmental Checklist on the proposed
development mentioned above, please find below our response to the
questions posed.
1(a)
Unstable earth conditions will be prevented
on the site and specifically, the west property
line by the construction of a reinforced concrete
retaining wall built as close as possible to the
natural toe of the slope. General design of the
wall will be per sheet A -I, submitted on March
27, 1978; however, drainage of seepage waters at
the base of this wall will be collected and
disposed per recommendations based on soils reports
as explained in items below.
l(b) and (c) I. East -lest topographical cross sections are
provided on sheet A -I already submitted.
1(e)
11. Approximately 2,000 cubic yards of earth will
be removed and will be dumped on a site within
the City of Renton.
111, Soils Report is presently being prepared by John
Crowser of Hart - Crowser Associates in Seattle.
The data from this report will be used in determining
slope stabilization and restoration means, ground
water relief system, footing and foundation details,
and general excavation and finish grade information.
Wind and water erosion will occur during grading
activity. Construction time water erosion problems
will be mitigated by construction of a temporary
storm water drainage pond which will be connected
City of Tukwila
Page 2
April 19, 1978
3(b)
13(a)
I3(f)
(but filtered by hay bales) directly to the
storm drain system running parallel to Southcenter
Parkway. The tap location on the storm system
shall be the same as that of the permanent connection.
Ditches will run across temporary site entrances
to prevent mud and water flow onto Southcenter Parkway.
We feel that due to the nature of the existing soil,
wind erosion will be a problem.
Surface storm water runoff will be collected by
means of a concrete formed gutter behind the retaining
wall which will be connected to the catch basin
system. In turn, this system deposits storm water
directly into the existing storm main. Please note
that a revised storm water system for the parking
areas is under design and somewhat contingent on the
finding of the pending soils report. Note also that
seepage water collected behind the retaining wall
will also be directed to this system.,
The average number of new vehicle trips generated
by our development will be in the area of 300 cars
per day. This development is characterized by the
following volume /tire trend, Initial peak between
11:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. with about 100 vehicle trips.
Second peak is from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. with about
150 trips generated at this time. It is possible to
speculate however that this development may well do
a much larger proportionate volume at the .earlier
time than the latter.
Our revised sheet A -1 will show the following revisions
to accommodate pedestrian traffic more satisfactorily.
I. A 51 sidewalk the length of the property
along curb line of Southcenter Parkway,
2. A sidewalk and stairway leading to main
entrance from sidewalk described above.
In summary, we will be submitting in the near future both a final soils
report and a revised site plan. The site plan will reflect changes outlined
in this letter, recommendations of the soils report, and revised storm water
system.
If any further problems or questions concerning our development have come
• •
City of Tukwila
Page 3
April 19, 1978
up since our last discussion, please inform us as soon as possible.
TJG:rz
cc: Jim Coryat
Sincerely,
ROBERT B. GOEBEL
GENERAL CONTRACTOR, INC.
Terry J Goebel
PLANNING
PARKS d
RECREATION
BUILDING
27 March 1978
CITY of TUKWOLA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Terry J. Goebel
P.O. Box 3086
Terminal Annex
North 715 Hogan
Spokane, Washington 99220
RE: Sizzler Steak House, Tukwila
Dear Mr. Goebel:
Initial review of the Environmental Checklist submitted for the above - referenced
project has been completed by the appropriate municipal departments.
We find the additional information enumerated below is necessary to facilitate a
threshold determination in accordance with WAC 197 -10 -330.
1 (a): Explain why grading activities will not result in unstable earth
conditions, especially in the vicinity of the hillside situated
near the west property line.
1 (b) & (c): Provide east -west topographical cross- sections (2) of the exist-
ing conditions and proposed conditions. Quantify the amount of
earth to be moved; if to be removed from the site, where will it
be taken. This information should be supplemented by a profes-
sional soils report and include the method of slope stabilization
and /or restoration.
1 (e): Explain why wind and /or water erosion of on -site soils will not
occur during grading activity. This should include methods of
erosion prevention and /or mitigation methods.
3 (b): Describe the method by which existing storm water run -off from
the westerly hillside will be handled.
13 (a): Estimate the number of new vehicle trips to this site to be
generated as a result of the proposal. Include peak volumes
and the hours at which they will occur.
13 (f): How will pedestrians be safely accommodated?
6230 Southcenter Boulevard e Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 (206) 242 -2177
Terry Goebel Page 2
27 March 1978
Sizzler Steak House
Inasmuch as a determination of proposal's environmental significance cannot be
made without the above information, it behooves you to fully provide the neces-
sary information at your earliest convenience. Should you have any questions,
please contact me.
Since ely,
Gary "utch ield
Assistant anner
GC /ch
cc: Bldg Off
• CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL OUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: o1”IW
PROJECT ADDRESS: /mm idAlt i e f z-DoytalA rrk. c9u /Gis* kii
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 1 5p5-17
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
Building: 914/OVI, �� / 77V by: �C/)
❑ Engineering: by:
(reviewer)
❑ Fire: by:.
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
lv-i2„0.--Q--ea- /en_
• CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: o t 33I 77?4L _ v $C., /
PROJECT ADDRESS: Jm»u -lit% („5ed7 p f ifle 1 5 i� 304e �ric&ka
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:. ///F
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
Engineering: .1-Zi- 7, by: , ',1/ ,Q,Qyj1,Q_ '
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
zoz ,.e. .Z .,do e
ter. c.►t 2-
. a Gam" •
A
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
• `
EdVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: 31-356/ 5-J- - n-va�
PROJECT ADDRESS: 50uf of
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 3 /1,? r
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
0 Building: by:
_ 0 Engineering: by:
CJ ire: by:
Tanning: by:
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
'Adak ', Wit (rV Ue-ps - ev1.ivt Cl .11,IndulJi
)t-`p stvV iN eipth 1AL't k . (9 ,t( t) e 1;I, e ff
t►;W OAAN) �/ir�i.�.- WMCit 6ft 61* L41.4 1kAl b
•
CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: `3 /G�A,L A
US"
PROJECT ADDRESS: f »/ elder/ ,ioS l D f �IGDOitde v SD fika,r 1w fe7k 4 0
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: r 6//6-/
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
?
)(Fire: > —Z4— 7K by:
❑ Planning: by•
❑ Police: by:
(reviewer)
4•09 A►/'
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
/3JJ9. /4�s RQ� e�,t 7i/,15 (1 ,07e —
e o f s/ j h/ 7C; e 4o c e- 1/1 /J 6 e--
Jbh9 of
04
Fir 747
;h ;_s /)r0['fC ,/(1.
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVI RONt1ENTAL CHECKLI ST FORM
This questionnaire must' be completed and submitted With the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs.of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: ��'z�L�.�- ��► `v eC) - '��-�� /JY��t�
2. Address and Phone Number' of Proponent: /i%h -z o re //c yC.7
(20 7
3. Date Checklist Submitted: 1)P44.t4' /$ /97/
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 06 ci{ 1 ,- -# ;f4- ?)- r,
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: amliAcice,L cy-167ziha 9a•.,, x-71? -°-h 'i
5., Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
. to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
ZAL-, Co.yi -c, /cs 1 crAp c*i��%ccOh'lc a 1 ii Sy. Yf. Com0,s-2'.41"`V
4;249 c 15y,G4G a Cx xYf 7 L& 7lrt _ Q4CACWV0C,t 'i R•.+eC- ‘
7.. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the .proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
. pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under:-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
l
is met, ■",,G �y ysOCX)
•
J�Z� -k
/,G, ve,/.,:, 74/41/.
J/
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 070P
9. List of all Permits,•Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state. and local):
(a) Rezone,. conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO %(
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES N( NO
(c) Building permit • YES)( NO
•
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO)(
(e) Sewer- hook up permit YESX NO
(f) Sign permit YES )( NO
(g) Water hook up permit YEUL NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES)‹! NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES y4—NO
(1) Other: 4e
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
44
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro -
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
," /ce,..
7 ,�j�lt_, G1
10-ft I /90.7 G
II. ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any .
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE NO
K
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
(f)
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: (S c`;,:, u 2:7 r v/`s'/ 4.0,/(.Aw i4C 7.
0//05;00,06/) CO /U - / •
74 Ax .e!%! / , q)47.764.
/off lexreii, �;'l/ C o.4,170/9
ac 65:, 4.•-•5
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
• quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration'
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
(f)
(g)
-3-
•
•
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation: /ii... ,,dc, 1,6
am,4L ie.. c6,
�/Pt 4j
ll / kncity.
YES MAYBE NO
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
(
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
-area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
6: - Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
Explanation: 1� 4 / Amrn 7 G�/l! % C944,
light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or. planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable
resource?
natural
Explanation: 46-6 ` °' f� /(iC•:
(eh/4, 7 4 5 � 476.-°4 41 ovt—
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
11'.- Population.
Explanation:
Will the proposal, alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
1 •
Explanation: �ve Cr�c..,. x"}10•. Ih '[1-L
e/;.ge4Able
14 Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,:
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
YES MAYBE NO
4/9
• •
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services?
• .Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel, or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation: 5;ce,Jeejae,7 ,./AafiedoC
Ael474Ary ci70e142c:::n0y.r.e.40‘;
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a)
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?..
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanatipn:-7 '744 c.„1!4:47,e4.44
ad)6■444 /4, fr„
Power or natural gas?
a4teric. ,
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential .
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
y
•
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure-on, mv part.
„ice 1 4 1gn ue and Title
Ivc %per
-8-
Received From
dres
•
•
nc,
sr
El
-ems
ELEYA/7Lw
WALL
(err) a .� \ — , \
\ _
\.,.. , \C C —.r1j i ter_ = — -- —
° Jb/P z 5 JA QN.CMEA/T
TA°,r -S EMaAVtA9EVJ .- 95'—°
•
\
'
Sr
•
^_ \
3L
\ ,
•
`3/1LL Po,N�"
\may. (r7,) •
EA •
IS
�S N
/2.10 '74FTC0'5[Op£O. O.PAIA/°
hVLE7EL <ZGcO ..
DP.G? 'A4,' A46A ' /.0148.
•
>A_
•
4O•
a
./A/LET
OR9 w446 A Etr z D, G2 Ac.
57 K 14VEr1UE
Cott �o�`
uTr!
Section AA
-SU /E: ,•''e / 20
vE:J /-/O-
(77R)
Sect ion- BB:
rwer2Rwy Lt.:E —
2 "C'[. B "A6jwALT. P,4V /A/6
OVER 1'CAv YED ROCK
1M
CoA/CRET£ +4,42. K .' .
COMPACTED C&)5/,'0 ' Roc :
TiEw
r eta
' W
eouctt-1r 7D.'C6
JOLa? i. /. Cote .94>s
(fir -75 s t /c. T. )`•:'..
rRmnR1Y - -
Y� _49 9c 36
)
70'•0°
�r'cl. e- AWL
A6J j
O�vrE,C 9- C.A.,6 eri, ..CoCt
r .WEED �c'„•
�ALIy 9•'n
x'.
F
.9ri /:4+•
two"
I
f"
�f @ 2!O'o.c
eA77E'eCJ4;47'.
- _9 'ofMsE/woVES 1 'o,c
. EACRF /cL AGA /A157- WAL[ "3 '
'TN,CeA/' 9$ Gf 2t- P a,,v
d4 @2 :O ctc:
ALL RE /Nj G4o4S
Reta ning'.Wall Section
,rio,r To .5 4LC
i rrereR.fl'.'.Ix:
5•4e
A•, n
` ASP!it. Pmer.k.)
sg
t-
p 6.0.4.11Nie. Sro 75- c►t�
c -r- .
t -c ..0 scer6 uD.:;s•sas !Fact
'I
0
a
t.
9
c.rC CURD
y4'i
i
r 7Ft� arch //4 (/.q, Pw:
rD rico/lAry c'oe,:A11
7 vM .NOS
/141:' ELEG7tc F4w•f1
SIZZ FI, ;:Y STEP' ,,OUSE
.F1T7
.:MP. !Lee
r".."110 sass '
awrFn Mel
• /
. - N. cute, cur-,
GO EEL °tors- rrr.ca:
.La..»c.aPS LKiNrs•.30E ELacr •?
• 0
•
A .. V aryP.+c�seawe ) ,,....::.,-'•, .
WMr " qr avGR XDr
1:' . wP
.rtc :w..irrYra ¢L�e .T •h`- .: wcn-•
s'. � .S'i ,�- - - -5,— S ;.
4'''' '46' —�f58 79,. -� ++%r,:' -• r• ,•
'.EXHIBIT "A ".- • '
-mat - "c" .
'.LEGAL DESCRIPTION . -
That- portion of the northiwest - quarter of Section.26. Township 23 North. 'Range 4 East..':
WA:- described as .follows:
'- Beginning at the southwest co /ner :of said northwest quarter of Section 26••.' '
Thence South 89 °21'31" E along the south line of said northwest ouarter a distance
of 1961.64 feet to the west•margin of 57th, Avenue South (Mess Brothers Road); •
Thence.N.00 °09'22" W alon said west margin a distance of- .250.00 feet; •
Thence N 89°21'31" W a distance-of 6.00 feet to the west.maigin of 57th Avenue South
as widened by deed from Southcenter Corporation to the City.of Tukwila recorded under
King County Auditor'• File No. 5735981;_
Thence'Nf00 °09'22° W along said west margin a distance of 150.00 feet;
Thence :continuing along said west margin N -00°,34'46" W a distance of 20.00 feet to the
true point of beginning;; .., - - •
Thence N 89 °21.31° W a' distance: of•163.37 feet to the easterly margin of Primary State•.`
Highway' No. 1, as condemned in United States District. Court' Cuase No. 6010;
Thence N 23 °31'36' W along said :easterly margin 118.01 feet, to an angle point ,harem; -
Thence- northerly along said easterly margin :along a curve to. the left; the center ofi
which bears 11 78 °43'19" W having a °radius of 6029.59 feet' an arc distance of 129.12'.
feet through a central angle of 01-13'37';
Thence'Nf 89 °25'14" E a distance.of 184.17 feet to the west margin of 57th Avenue
South'es- widened; . . , _ -
Thence .5'00 °34'46° E'along said -west margin a distance of 238.79 feet 'to the true A c
point of beginning.
Situate in the City of Tukwila. King'County Washington.
OWNER. :
_
— — - iJrvoRSIFIEr, Ac,17S
• ' EMT 9707) Spg. eJa
'SPY,* ►hie. ,VsSWl4elro w)
CONTRACTOR - Ra ,r pj C7 o enc.
Office
F70£ Of SLOfl6
Alf t'a0A/ALD a3 RESTAL4e.AA/T
c
/1=4,/,'Se AREA`
rR?PERTT niis. ".. �.
• is Ssi:. Sewer'
Y.oRM ,aWe'rt
6RetaSE TIC6r' .Pei:armee.
Lncara IN51r,s -51-Nu .T
.rl PossrsLs. G0Nio2w �o .
.;LOJJ7]to o',;,:v_ /,..:- -- .: c;tc w.
.,.)D'FJAT6. yB "e e.7'. 3lo ew+. DF4 /K. .
3 ce°rcost.re IJLtrs4':Wa er.n la�lJccrNtqy
TBLEP�N6 G.LeGf/�e 4ND ay ',crevice
.:
cm ',as. VaRIFY LO4TIoN'OP 1-r454r,
•iEI tGE4 'V,t 'Sat t.OLa110K anIt, .
DI'4rsiDUrINei.'Co rim eligr•
•
.• Lerr xoCiso • ate,.
57 AveguE SouTrJ •
rN cuwLS wr-�} I..
`/o% - s -tote/'
1 STN '716 rnydnl.
So o Ka.Ja. 1V >SN,r.l tnron
field. Don ..1•3n)es
aroFfl a ?•+o p e1(5oq) 555-5877
Pdo.:e, (309) 466-5959
nccuotoce
TYPE COHSTRHC1I0r1
V- NI
DISTANCE FROM -
.. PROPERTY LINES
Nokrei: 79 Roar SoUT-1: •79 yEar ,
as- r: 025 feet
4924 squsxL reel'
FLOOR. AREA
OCCUPANCY LOAD
I9
\\IeSr J ES 9�-Ii5
3d- /YLrirsduJ
2 / raesi ud'
SG .rccwd
HEIR441. '- .QJ
f DOrVAt05 NORTH
I /ea/r-g7r:�.1: RE5TAUfA.VT : /•
— .. �RiJfvcCA/7• . • Ammo'
LOCATION ` • PLAN`
- 1:ZZLE„
FAMI:LY';:STEAIC Ho
sestissettec
••
.'t
.roymond ' F. cortnetR: ai
west - 124-- 2 7 ove nue^
Spokane '.' washington"
Q
mesa byRK•
scene:IgtriPr+
fr': 'LR9
:v._i.rft:r
rie;dT't.
*1001 W.
gate
80801
ft
•t5
mar
i�
4
BY DATE..:....... SUBJECT.. SHEET NO...
CHKD. BY DATE JOB NO..
..30
- ZG�
22
3Z
Z8
21
OF .
a "el. Z ,PC.P
5 = nose9
QF _ 6.0/ cpS
VF = 7605. fps
/ie0 /LE
57D,eM S / ;e L //v5
ft
/Z `CC. 2 !PC./?
3 2 D1O7
= /0�.f5.
vF 76F/7"
P' OF /L5
47eM SEw•z /A/ iV
1
•o
N\- /Z CL, 2 /P C.P.
5. 0./3%
/4.0/Gf.
VFW /8:Zf S
/2 l/ & 2
5 = 0,/00
Q ; /Z -Zoe ,776
v, = /S, FT/'
JZ
ZS
Z¢
,. /, ; V f'_ t:; 1 1 r,
/ At'C' rllt 41.1.;0
J c F
if