HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-57 - DON KOLL NORTHWEST - KOLL ANDOVER PHASE IIIKOLL ANDOVER PH III
EPIGFD -57
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
EBETEDEE1/FINAL
DECLARATION OF i'JON —S I GN I F I CA dCE
Description of proposal Don Koll Andover - Phase III
Proponent Don 011 Northwest
Location of Proposal Industry Drive and Minkler Boulevard
Lead Agency City of Tukwila
File No. EPIC -FD -57
This proposal has been determined to (/not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS (is/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision- was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Kjell Stoknes
Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development
Date
9 June 1978 Signature
COMMENTS:
June 2, 1978
Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom
City of Tukwila
Office of Community Development
Tukwila, Washington 98188
1844 -A
•
RE: Environmental Checklist Questionaire: Koll- Andover Phase III
Dear Mr. Satterstrom:
In response to your letter of 25 May 78, the following comments are
noted for your perusal.
Item
1. The land has been in a surcharged: state for.approxi.mately„thr_-ee ;years
and is basically flat. The construction proposed would not result
in unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures.
284 5771
2. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality could be affected
through increase in traffic (trucks, and automobiles).
3. Changes in absorption rates and drainage could be affected. Buildings
paving and landscaping would alter areas of absorption. Changes
in the quantity of ground water could be altered but probably not
significantly as the water table is high in this area.
6. Noise levels could be effected through increased traffic.
13. Parking requirments are satisfied on site and exceed local requirements.
The effect on existing facilities would be negligible.
Hopefully this expands some of our thinking on the items you felt needed
further response. If we can further clarify any of these points, please
call me directly. Please find enclosed the revised environmental check-
list form.
R pectf 1
9
Vic+ President
RABcj
25 May 1978
CITY of TUKW LA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Royce A. Berg
Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.
1844-A Westlake Avenue North
Seattle, Washington 98109
RE: ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE: KOLL ANDOVER PHASE III
Dear Mr. Berg:
The Planning Division has just completed a preliminary review of the envir-
onmental questionnaire on the above - referenced project.
There are several "NO" responses to questions which I feel may or will be
impacted by the proposed development. Pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -330, would
you please explain the "NO" answers to the following questions on the
questionnaire:
Question No.
1. (a)
2. (a)
3. (b)
3. (d).
3. (g)
6.
13. (b)
If you have any questions concerning the above, please don't hesitate to
call.
ectfully,
Satte stro
Planning Supervisor
F1LS /ch
cc: EPIC File
6230 Southcenter Boulevard n Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (206) 242 -2177
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00. must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Thy Koll Company
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 2723 152nd Ave. N.E., Redmond..
Washington 98052 Telephone: (206) 885 -5765.
3. Date Checklist Submitted: Mav 18, 1978
ja)/7/3)1ril
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Building & Planning j y
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Koll Andover Phase III
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
5 single and 2 two -story buildings of multi - tenant industrial type,
total 93,100 s.f.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Open property on a filled, level area presently covered with light
vegetation at intersection of Industry Drive and Minkler Blvd. in
Tukwila, Washington.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: January, 1979
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government .Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) Xing County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
(c) Building permit YES X NO
• •
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO
(f) Sign permit YES x NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES .X NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES x NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES x NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x NO
(1) . Other:
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by .
your proposal? If yes, explain:
if:
'No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro -
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Binding Site Improvement Plan, City of Tukwila Building Permit,
City of Tukwila Planning Commission.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1.. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
(b) .Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? Paving
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
_7_
X
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
X
X
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
• •
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters? X
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? X
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels? X
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? X
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an .
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
• Explanation:
X
X
X
11. Population.
Explanation:
• •
Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Generation of additional vehicular movement?
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
Impact upon existing transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
in:
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? - X
Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy? X
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to . the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
X
• •
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a 'signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
12/ L'L
Sig :ture �n Title
• `J le
-8-
18 May 1978
Date
X
X
•
Art/ Lt.--- ig.(_41
Lea Son Pa N,v, 11-c___-
we-i a- w
- f-h-t- gel act