Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-58 - EHMKE / KATO - REZONE (62ND AVENUE SOUTH / 154TH STREET)EHMKE - KATO REZONE 62NDAVES&S 154 ST EPIGFD -58 PLANNING PARKS & RECREATION BUILDING 19 June 1978 • C T Y of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY 'DEVELOPMENT Mr. Bruce Mecklenburg P.O. Box 822 . Seahurst,' Washington 98062' E: Environmental Checklist for Ehmke-Kato Dear Mr. Mecklenburg: Please find attached my proposed withdrawal for a requirement of an Environ- mental Impact Statement on the Ehmke -Kato property. I would appreciate if you would coordinate this with Mr. Ehmke, the applicant. As soon as I get the proposed withdrawal returned tome I will sign it and implement the withdrawal. Until such time as this is accomplished, the Planning Commission cannot take any action on the rezone application. Very truly yyurs, 546kiti“-° ell Stoknes, Director 0 fice of Community Development KS /ch Attachment: Withdrawal of Declaration of Significance 6230 Southcerrtar Boulevard a Tukwila, Washington 96188 a (206) 242 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f' FOSte./ 4-NAE DECLA RAT I @N- C -8-4 -& 4 IAN -C-EA0- C414-F- CMGE WITHDRAWAL OF DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency Ehmke -Kato Rezone PRELIMINARY Horst Ehmke and Ti Kato 62nd Avenue South and ± South 154th Street City of Tukwila • • File No. EPIC- This proposal has been determined to (#hw.e /not have) a significant adverse i. pact upon the environment. An EIS (a -& /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.03O; (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complec._d environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agen: . Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development Date 15 June 1978 Signature/ COMMENTS: This negativedeclaration is made subject to compliance with the following mitigating measures: 1. Roadway and utilities: a. Dedicate easterly 5 feet of land to the City of Tukwila for right -of -way. This is to be accomplsied by August 31, 1978. b. Enter into an agreement with the City of Tukwila agreeing to . participate in a future local improvement district to make .necessary. public improvements (road, sidewalk and utilities). to. 62nd Avenu South when and as deemed necessary by the City of Tukwila. This is to be executed by August 31, 1978. 2. Internal on -site parking circulation is to be desgined -to accoi=odate fire protection vehicles, as determined necessary by ttie Fire Chef. •This is to occur prior. to issuance of any building •permits to the site. Withdrawal of Declaration of Significance Ehmke -Kato Rezone Page 2 15 June 1978 3. Submission of all the following for cuts two feet in height or over in con- junction with a building permit application: a. Cross section of cut to scale b. Construction detailson any rockery or bulkhead, including drainage provisions. c. Method of reducing hazards to people as a result of bulkhead cons tion. For example, safety railing at top of bulkhead. 4. Provide adequate water flow for emergency demand per requirements of Fir_, Chief. This is to be accomplished or a contractual agreement reached prior to issuance of any building permits to the site. 5. Building permit application is to include an effective erosion control plan. On site parking lot design to include some method of ground water recharge, if engineeringly sound. c. I agree to implement the mitigating measures stated under items 1 5 in the comments to the Withdrawal of Declaration of Significance. Horst Ehmke, Applicant Date PLANNING PARKS 8 RECREATION BUILDING 19 June 1978 CITY afTU =:IMOLA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Bruce Mecklenburg P.O. Box 822 Seahurst, Washington 98062 RE: Environmental Checklist for Ehmke-Kato Dear Mr. Mecklenburg: Please find attached my proposed withdrawal for a requirement of an Environ- mental Impact Statement on the Ehmke -Kato property. I would appreciate if you would coordinate this with Mr. Ehmke, the applicant. As soon as I get the proposed withdrawal returned to me I will sign it and implement the withdrawal. Until such time as this is accomplished, the Planning Commission cannot take any action on the rezone application. Very truly y urs, I I. ell Stoknes, Director 0fjfice of Community Development KS /ch Attachment: Withdrawal of Declaration of Significance 6230 Southcenter Boulevard e Tukwila, Washington 98188 ® (206) 242 -2177 June 12, 1978 City Of Tukwila RECEIVED Office Of Community Deve I opement O.C.D. CITY OFTUKWU.A 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98188 Q A JUN 1 3 1978 RE: Rezone R -3 and C -1 to R -4 (Ehmke- Kato) The following Revision is in consideration of mitigating factors. �. as defined in the "Proposed Declaration of Significance" Dated 5- 18 -78; A\ Item # 1. The impact of additional traffic.'' on the present road system. Need for road and utility improvements. O A. Will dedicate easterly 5 feet of land to the City for N Right -of -Way. (Indicated on Site Plan) B. Will enter into agreement with City of Tukwila agreeing 11% to participate in a future local improvement district to make necessary public improvements to 62nd Ave. So. (road & utility) when and as deemed necessary by the O City of Tukwila. Item # 2. ;internal parking circulation to accommodate fire pro - tection vehicles. A. Plan revised to satisfy this requirement based on review with City of Tukwila Fire Marshal. Final details of same will be reviewed again with Fire Marshal for his approval. (Prior to Building Permit Application) Item # . Safety provisions to be built in conjuction with retaining • walls. S A. Will obtain necessary soils investigation and will design and construct retaining walls and rockery according to soils report findings and best Structural Engineering I practice. d B. All of this, of course is subject to final review once the \11 Building Permit Application id made. AN C. All necessary precautions will be taken to provide safety guards during Construction for protection of the public and workmen. Will comply with all local, state and federal regulations. IM"'1 ' A a c K i Ye c Y• 24a•3/35 • • Page 2 Item # 4. Method of providing adequate water flow for emergency demand. A. Will provide adequate water flow for emergency demand. If the demand exceeds existing capacity this will be accom- plished by one of the following;; 1. Provide additional storage on Site. 2. Install pump in lines entering Site. 3. Revise existing water main by increasing size or make loop connection. (This solution requires a considerable expenditure for Engineering, which seems premature to action on the Rezone.) Perhaps, if this type of solution is required it could be a condition of the Rezone to be satisfied at the time of the Building Permit Application. B. It seems as though more than one developement would be contributing to the problem thus requiring a more comp- rehensive sdution. C. Fire Hydrants will be located on subject property per Ordinance and as approved by the Fire Marshal. Item # 5. Erosion control methods during construction. A. Erosion control will be accomplished thru temporary siltation settleing basins and filtered thru straw bails etc. Generally in compliance with King County Standards. Also exposed surfaces to be protected where necessary. Item # 6. Constuction details of all excavations including safety barriers to people and /or cars. A. Will provide shoring and safety barriers to protect the public and workers as necessary during the Construction. All local, E* state and federal regulations will be apheardd to. Details as required will be submitted at the time of Building Permit Application and additionally during -v Construction as necessary. Also enclosed is a revised Drawing indicating the proposed access easement for the adjacent property to the west of the Rezone under consideration, and a reduction of the number of living units from 96 to 87. I hope the above will satisfy the mitigating factors and allow consideration of our Rezone request at the June Planning Commission Hearing. $ Sincere! y , �I, WY`I► Bruce W. Mecktienburg For Ehmke - Kato 30 . -sye 10 5 . axe-4,-1w rC .R i° D.D/ .• .cn:- ,moo PI M -- o-6:c11 3 =xn ,: war2 cou 312_r.^"OW -- Ap2os, 2000 • 1 SL:• tv -o Frr . 4101 Lu 16L19 ie , r Do m 40 •� . So HSG.84 / 70 gtplen,eo To- c,T.i� - -- Ni zou� � L �n tg-° - t- -�OC i i� rorr +F rcec. since z� oe7,c sma • n.a�>p �-� )_ zsNy Req'o: 11 rA zovlvec:Is3 �. -_.LEI d _ 0 • • GTG ■'"" �M I 0 +.iCEBUitZ6p� YA2D! W A R• G by X62 u0 • 6 • TT L C • v. 01J. -_ -- 242•.9706 +r/3n acv F- Cr: rr7 • 3 l 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 - P (2 O POS E O COL-1901- 4 11J I U M- 4 Pp2'1.A E V T .__!7 -E ALE LO'�E N1 EiJT _ .. 1-10 257 E I- ■•■1 k . - - - - _ . - 7G CO- OS• 7 .si-r- E p:- .N CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED /fit DECLARATIOi1 OF SIGNIFICANCE /' Description of proposal Ehmke -Kato Rezone Proponent Horst Ehmke and T. Kato Location of Proposal 62nd Ave. So. and ±So. 154th St. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC This proposal has been determined to (have /net -gave) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /met) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community. Development 5/18/1978 Signature COMMENTS: Consideration may be given if the applicant can change the rezone application to mitigate the following per WAC- 197 -10 -370: 1. The impact of additional traffic on the present road system: Need for road and utility improvements. 2. Internal parking circulation to accommodate fire protection vehicles. 3. Safety provisions to be built in conjunction with retaining walls. . 4. Method of providing adequate water flow for emergency demand. 5. , Erosion control methods during construction. 6. Construction details of all excavations including safety barriers to0op1e and /or cars. 17 May 1978 • • CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kjell Stoknes, Di. tor, OCD FROM: Gary Crutchfiel• stant Planner SUBJECT: THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Ehmke -Kato Rezone F, Development Checklist and additional information review by all affected departments has been completed. The following conclusions are made1this office. 1. Assignment of the R -4 zone will greatly increase the density and intensity of multiple- family development currently assigned to the site. 2. Significant excavation /filling activities are included; resulting erosion could be a problem. 3. Fire Department is concerned about inadequacy of water supply for proposed development. 4. Will significantly increase the existing traffic volume and peak loads on 62nd Avenue South. RECOMMENDATION: Based on departmental comments regarding the Environmental Checklist and the specific conclusions enumerated above, the Planning Division recom- mends an Affirmative Threshold determination be made and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for use in the decision- making process. GC /ch 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177 City of Tukwila Fire Department Edgar D. Bauch Mayor May 15, 1978 Hubert H. Crawley Fire Chief Gary Crutchfield Planning Department City of Tukwila Dear Gary: In regard to the environmental check list for Ehmke -Kato, the problems addressed under Item 2, Access for Emergency Vehicles - Fire, still has not been addressed at all in the list returned by Bruce W. Mecklenbur on May 5, 1978. In addition, the question of fire flows still has not been properly addressed due to the fact that the square foot- age of the apartments, construction, placement of line , type of material used to build the line, number of valves, elbows and most fittings has not been addressed. The big problem is still an access. The complex is laid out as one of the poorest arrangements for maneuvering emergency vehicles of any I have seen. There is no way we would approve the access allowed to these buildings at the time the permit is requested. The only way we would give approval would be to eliminate a considerable amount of the parking spaces which would create problems within your department. If you wish any further information regarding this, please contact me at my office. Sincerely, HHC :vma Hubert H. Crawley cc:TFD file Fire Chief. City of Tukwila Fire Department, 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 575 -4404 OFOCE MEMO CITY of TUKWILA 57/0 /76 TO: VlL -' FROM: SUBJECT: / ke"g" • P/466, AleidausAi ye'a'r` t.. rev iedziA44--- w Gam , /2 /x7 rth. a iew v ties d// a eS /0071 c rss .1-'7 /10-7v a to c., 7 gacce. S Ga / �- p 7' &.vim ,d 46/c ,S7-rc . 71 �_ /a -7r MTV of TUKKWfLA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 24 April 1978 ' Mr. Bruce Mecklenburg P.O. Box 822 Seahurst, Washington 98062 RE: Environmental Checklist for Ehmke -Kato Dear Mr. Mecklenburg: DECEIYEMAY 51918 CRY OF NKWILA Initial review of the environmental. information submitted for the Ehmke -Kato rezone and development has been completed. Additional information is deemed necessary in order to determine the significance of the project. 1. Earth: Topography map indicating extent of cuts /fills, their quanti- fication, and disposal site of exhorted earth, if any. 2. Utilities: Extension of sanitary sewer. Access for emergency vehicles (fire) and calculations indicating fire flow. - �� N 3. Streets: Traffic (volume and peaks) generated by this project as well as potential of property to west. Please provide the above information at your earliest convenience as we are unable to determine the project's significance without it. Should ` %u have any questions, please call. Since Ga y Cr Assistan GC /ch field Tanner cc: Dir, OCD Assoc Plnr ''Bldg 0ff 44 #r C arw& &AI /, / oixt000 r/ ' 04644f/4/4 /0i/0 fFiz., -76 6230 Southcenter Boulevard e Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -217, 6 L: 41/4. IV/ 44 -,S'_ 7S r'i dz M A 1,-' 2.3 - 7 7 - 12e:6 Li 1- 2 ©oc) /--,7 .x_'15 4.1 a ,e. , e • F.4-i F A S aA ;r ".1 %72 %2u ti../ X(.7 2 -.3 /-/ YC' , *$ /a! 4 m?.. �4 - 6 • %' `" / /3 / c' E 7-/i a -' 6014 •eB''ts;4 A S 0GV-2 r e e4 U E /-3' -5 ;) 7'7.//e' Hl /L ! !V 1:1.(1,'G / /='4 : e_.-44.4./ 4/ ki A C, L }-- 2 7 A,14 ^) 7 r� / .M r'1?) 7 7 • ;""" "'.; . C.) E/ .......-,-/ .., / ........• 7,,,, 7.,,...rtiz,,....-/:._ ,,e--t .„,-- - ,...„.., „..... 17- ..,./ :: ---'.....":- ., . .7.- ./..i-7 -,,,- ...,,,,-f; e., -::, — - -•' .- (....,- ,-::.--- ....-..,/ „.....-...." ./..-71 c.-4-,-,..::, :,.„ 71,- ri"..t7".C- 7,.5". 2/ , 4. 61■C.r /i.-.;',--f -r---, ././9 ;:',' ,-.4.'"' =--,.' . --2 , .,•- .„ 4....5-. ..74- .0.1‘,/...1, ..,?....7 ,-,-7-- -3 • /,'"..,,, ce.../^.4-1.7 ;'''.:37 .1e -..?"./..-f ....:.,,. , 's .........e. cf-:e,,e/....;4' •e---;17.9.,,"*.z. ..7 r 74"; ..9 ,....... :- ) /172/ . ''S ••;.i.s....., c.-f..' 40.,' ..i"..;.7- .... / ,'--.' , ,.Y..,-.5.) - s 7 „., ,---er.o..,,,.../ ,--7...,,......-,...........,.... ../ , • ,... ,,,e.:3 .C.;,......7 /.;"..;%/...'" ..-1".; ...-..-/i." . •;•'.) • -.,-....- ‘,..,',...,,.‘r, ..,-; / .4-7/.....- -.''1. ,/e.) 2,," •' •,,- ,....-P.„,';-::,,,,'. ..::7-....--;••,. < :' ;.? = ' ,.. ;,",•• `, .. , 7- //4...1. • ) r sn 7:: ' 4,'Z)' '' 1...,D ". 7 r /' / <"' .,, • ,77 • .' /1 , • ,/ ▪ ef,,:; 6 f . 4 a- . - 7 " x 2 3 / .4% = 7/ ,-- 1 g6Fc71./E e9 c.402.4e7 0 10, micialp 1440 Pt20 rZir Y' '243e3 trZI PS /r7AY 414 e7,60 1..16.0F Li4it.5 ot,4 V.cpuiv ps.1.151Ty. op* 4usaci rzo spt4 C 19C-re AC1211 Atzeio: 74,69e 1;767 itic.AE5 C17 U L.11t5714', 46 1-1141i-6 ar, ML 6,t4re.S. c4r25 7 c P.) 1.11,1 t5 • +-r-rzir25A2Ay 5A552 co.-1 AVE, cDP -rrelr-'7, O , m4 13A.551.) 2.42 47#.3 e)p ae4urzik14 0574/E.014, 7r c.') Amt. 13;40 AM AND F'M 5,1,42 F7K4 1■4C2i-I2AY 11.4211 r.z, I r.:";'AY' I, 7 Ft Le_ PLANNING PARKS & RECREATION BUILDING 24 April 1978 COTVofITU +WLA OFFICE of COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT Mr. Bruce Mecklenburg P.O. Box 822 Seahurst, Washington 98062 RE: Environmental Checklist for Ehmke -Kato Dear Mr. Mecklenburg: Initial review of the environmental information submitted for the Ehmke -Kato rezone and development has been completed. Additional information is deemed necessary in order to determine the significance of the project. 1. Earth: Topography map indicating extent of cuts /fills,'their quanti- fication, and disposal site of exported earth, if any. 2. Utilities: Extension of sanitary sewer. Access for emergency vehicles (fire) and calculations indicating fire flow. 3. Streets: Traffic (volume and peaks) generated by this project as well as potential of property to west. Please provide the above information at your earliest convenience as we are unable to determine the project's significance without it. Should ` %u have any questions, please call. Since Ga y Cr Assistan GC /ch field Planner cc: Dir, OCD Assoc Plnr Bldg Off 6230 Southcenter Boulevard R Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 (206) 242 -2177 V ► STQ WT1 O • CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONiM1ENTAL OUESTION'',AIRE REVIEW FORM f3148 Ens fit ;re, PROJECT NAME: eia M " ILATD e ZOIJG d APAt21 1E JT5 PROJECT ADDRESS: (,Z-4 AWMVt 301 Nmtitt of s ,6aulev4 g DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) XBuilding: aleizzLe, /0f / q% t by: a, ic�- t / ID by: Engineering: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: "6`4;-- A 111 CITY OF TUKWILA • "DiTiZtOUT1001 31d9 ENVIRONMENTAL OUESTIObi';AIRE REVIEW FORM Eng 4/11! five, PROJECT NAME: eE o/1G 4 r11Et rr5- I PROJECT ADDRESS: �Z4 / l Ve 306 NOVJit a{ . eid /lice t7w 6ide4/ DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: • 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: kk ❑ Engineering: by: Fire: / % by: AAA-"" \ ❑ Planning: by: N\ ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: VI -r tWT100 III . CITY OF TUKWILA III 3Id9 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM En9 74/i/ir -w e PROJECT NAME: El-I M -- VATO IZt ZONG $ APP►I2- "MN'T5 PROJECT ADDRESS: (0,Z9 AllteMa 1 3001 IUw it of ,_ad/4ccs2iw,6uu /eva.�z{ DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: ‘1- ATI' No - 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) • (reviewer) ❑ Building.: .by: XEngineering: V —/D - 7Y by:• ,ei -2 • ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑.Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: GZGt -P J j 74.21y2A2,> i, J Gv • CITY OF TUKI'!JLA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ECEIVE APR 51978 This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the CrriMiTIMOLA permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement.needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Bruce W. Mecklenburg - Architect - For Owner H,. Ehmke $LT. Kat 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: P.O. Box 822, Seahurst, Wash.. 98062L 242 -3735 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): ,{ See Site Plan and Vicinity Map 2t�b _ + 2- 4 vv-' WittfiPVIA-4g-- Ayri,„ws 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental ini pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under - standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Subject property is located West of and adjacent to 62nd Ave. S. approx. 200 Ft. North of Southcenter Blvd. Property slopes to south 10 to 15 %. The property contains 156339 Sq. Ft. (3.5 Acres) See Site Plan and Vicinity Map B. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Dec. _19.Z$.. 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) (b) (c) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. King County Hydraulics Permit Building permit YES X NO YES NO X YES X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO 7-‘X_ (e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO (f) Sign permit (IF REQD.) YES NO (g) Water hook up permit YES X N0___ (h) Storm water system permit (IF REQD.) YES NO (i) Curb cut permit (IF REQD.) YES NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X N0_____ (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO (1) Other: Telephone, cable T,, V., Puget Power, EH-. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NQ 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at soma: future date, describe the nature of such application form: NIA II. ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- i ng of the soil? Balance cut! & F i l l and provide topsoil where required. (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures ?Onix as necessary to site buildings and par i g. See Site Plan. (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO X X • • YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality ?Only elated to parking required for automobiles (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: Changes — Bare Land to apartment use 3 Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X X X X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X Where ground covered with pavement, roofs and walks. (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Remainder Landscaped. (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Only as related to parking (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduced absorbtion due to paved area and roof. --- -3- X • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters?. _X_ (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ?. _ X_ Variety may be increased as provided in planting (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or C n s cape d area. endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X See (a) above (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X. Explanation: Existing - primarily covered with grass and blackberries, minimal amount of low natives, and a few fruit trees. Additional landscaping will be included in the project. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Do not believe __-_ _X_ — effect will be significant. (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? As related to apartment use Explanation: Auto Circulation as required for Multiple Dwellings per Zoning Ordinance 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: Only normal apartment related sources Minimal glare from area lighting. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Present use Tess dense than future planned use. Conforms to Comprehensive Plan Land Use. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources ?' (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: Electrical power 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: Only. as related to passenger automobiles X • • YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation:. Land now vacant to be Multiple Dwelling use. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: Additional movement and parking as related to and required for Multiple Dwellings. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, . or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X Explanation: As related to Multiple Dwelling density use. Will also generate additional income for such services. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: As related to Multiple Dwelling density use. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Extention of sewer main from Southcenter Blvd. • Extention of Electrical, Telephone Services now under construction. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: None known X X X • • • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it night issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. fait. Sicnaturj and Title /Wolf pl iv1► f (A+. -8- '1 � rl 4 Date X • • For 13 r. .t CE .iN USE SECT ^.TIO O APPLICATION r. O � L �,C�. Oc' I?Lt� U.� C�.��..t: _�.,.: �._ 1 �,.. .,_. I.i".>JJFII.._is! ION O= I:j.,D USE REGU- LATIW.S IN THE CITY FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No. Planning Carmission Action Receipt No. Filing Date City Council Action Hearing Date Ordinance No. & Date APPLICANT TO ANS ER ALL TEE FOLLO JUNG QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: Bruce W. Mecklenburg - Architect Nacre For H. Ehmke & T. Kato Address . P.O. Box 822 Seahurst, Wash. 98062 .Telephone No. .242 -3735 Property Petitioned for rezoning is located on The West Side of 62nd Ave. So. between 200 Feet North of Southcenter Blvand So. 153rd Street Total square footage in property 156339 Sq. Ft . (3.5 Acres) TEL DESCRLPTION OF PROPERTY ( See Attached ) • 51978 Cory OP TUKw, , Existing Zoning R; — District & C -1 D i st r i c. onng requested R - 4 District .What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Condom 1 n 1 um Apartments, 96 Living Units in 8- Plexes & 6- Plexes • Number of permanent off - street parking spaces that will be provided on property? 1.45 Number required 144 NOTICE TO APPLICIL\7I': The following factors are considered in . reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to sutr It to substantiate . your request may be attached to this sheet. ..(Sew' Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minim n requirements.) 1. %'ihat provisions will be made to screen adjacent .and surrounding property from any incc af- hle effects which may arise as a result of the proposed land use classification? Will provide Screening and Landscaping as required be Zoning Code and as reasonably necessary as condition warrents 2. Z•;oat provisions will be mace to provide for necessary street widening to City :minimum sLa _'arils? Dedicate Easterly "5 Ft. to City for Right - of- Way and Enter into agreement with City to participate in future Improvements to 62nd Ave. So. when deemed necessary by City of Tukwila 3. V,h-D . pro-•1t. -.ions I•iiii 1)--_-! car. to for a C cjua to se-,,;'r and wat:er snrvlce? Sewer Permit has been issued for extent i on up 62nd So. from Southcenter Blvd. Water is adequet (checked Pressure) and will provide Fire Hydrants as - required l l,C?•( (1•_f•. '( !_,-.t7 L'-.:I lt_J vn..l...t 1. Ll��: ... .1- i.c)-:''�_ 2_��_� -l_�'� . "(_r' ,J�_ %i.... - - -- --- -... Zoning Request conforms to Comprehensive Plan Land Use . ; • : • • 2.5 / 206.0. P. P. • s.. -•••• 59. • x6i • • . DIKE - KATO' 'REZONE APPLICATION (4----/5 ./ < 1 r,/ P*• III�'t•:f t't • • ' i ms ; s` i •; 1 • •• . • Ir✓ lr NOIIV3I1ddV 3NOZ31 0101 - .3 )1113 0 • -( 1002 = 11T Et S • u` j, _._ • . r II • • . ✓ • • '� ;tff ter;•'•,•,• •` • '4t • I i. --�j -, !••i: j • j ANUS • It _ '� (, °1 1. i,• ti , 'It. y �� rtt ;it • • �' % ' IS t ,'.. f,. • • • • • • , '' 0 • • • /40 easq.ftV nellS• 4' • 3 0 )4V,Air - C;tt 0- 9 if 9' • -,;9 • - • • effiCir eLt 1.1..part 00,4 0100,410N Pr2..•. 2.00 0 • _Nina Mnirr f.4.0 . ""-I.4.17—_:-.1t.'":::■14,1., •`4,. 4vie.77,;;;;;!!, ;.,! ...:;;:: -.-,-.--.,.- 7. I nrin—'' in'irpriq ,;-::_3117tiftffilr-s.. -...711r;vonlj.ITairv.,::, .445... • : • * '. A. 1 --- ■•'6.. '. • .-- 1 ; . • r • . , - ?....7 --..... .150,c.4;r••6--Sd-, -.1k> . .. 4 s ' -'• . ; . '- • . . - vo .- , .. •2,... 11 V• . . . ... .. . • . . . . e C -F.F-71.1.---- - ----c (La 1. :_ri 12_______:21...1. -A-f • '. 4 s *. - Pe- '4.1:4- '-;-----...._..:rbR.Lrslij14.. w-siTairra.4s.-gi:RoF4r)itils qjGrItxre.ovrav 4111.7• )01e, 0, zaa. 3 --% _....-. . - 1 • . • . • w , .6 • -•Pr2c..7Posso Cow(701.411,1iuhet- A PAI2 oe P - - - LiCr.r11 - ' tlJ4.4. uP.IA.r2141.0,441....2,10V0.14 re0 1. 7.7a 4.47e1 ;1-r P L. - • • boas+ ;i. ; °: .:` ; :;�, i`i'i:K�fB,� ca >�la5I•�4 HMI b;.