Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-59 - GARFIELD TRUCK LINES - CONDITIONAL USEGARFIELD TRUCK LINE 1040 ANDOVER PARK WEST EPIC -FD-59 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL DECLARATION OF CIGNIFICASE /NO - SIGNIFICAJCE Description of proposal Conditional Use Permit Proponent Garfield Truck Lines Location of Proposal 1040 Andover Park West Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -59 This proposal has been determined to ( ta-e /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (4e/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office of Community Developmen Date June 30, 1978 Signature COMMENTS: a,Uf-s Ca/30/78 w Mr. Kjell Stockness City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 w Garfield Transfer Company Ali Box 24584 Seattle, Washington 98124 Subject Date b /28 /78 ' M E S S A G E Please find enclosed, answers to items listed in Mr. Crutchfield's letter of May 8th. Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $50.00, covering fee for costs of review. _ / / _ J/ n T Igne 7 v 7 ; ;'/J�a D.C.U. CITY OF TUKWILA JIM 2 9 ling gne to KLIP STATIONERS 472 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT — PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST "FORM RECEDV O.C.D. CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 9 1978 This questionnaire must be completed and submitted ' with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all?, persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. 4` 4 A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the /Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: GARFIELD TRANSFER COMPANY, INC. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Warehouse business operation at 1040 Andover Park West, including public trucking for delivery of stored product. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal) : Existing warehouse building, paved area and landscaping, as previously approved by the City of Tukwila. Company ownership of 18 trucks and 21 trailers reduces road traffic by many trips per day overall, compared to use of common carriers located elsewhere. Parking of most trucks and trailers is during off business hours. 8. Estimated Date for. Completion of the Proposal: 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO possibly (b)" King County Hydraulics Permit YES NOX (c) Building permit YES NOX YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? As in #7, less truck movement involved with on site trucks. (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or Some trucks are parked demand for new parking? in automobile parkings spaces, however under these conditions, an excess of approximately 50 spaces exist. (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? E gar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY ®r MK 54:ILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 .26 June 1978 Ms. Josephine.F_randsen Garfield Transfer Company 1938 Occidental Ave. So. Seattle, Washington 98134. -_. • RE: Application for Conditional Use Permit,.Environmental Checklist Dear Ms. Frandsen: The Planning Commission had the above- referenced item on their agenda on June 22,-1978. Based on lack of a complete application, the Planning Commission tabled this item until their next regular meeting of July 27, 1978. The last item needed to complete your application is simply a $50.00.filing fee to accompany the Environmental Checklist to cover cost of review. After that fee has been received by take action on the Environmental Checklist and initiate a report to the Commission regarding your project. In order for me to process this to the.Commission, I will need to receive that $50.00 fee by July 5, 1978. If no action is taken on this permit regarding payment of the fee, it is my intention to recommend to the Planning Commission that this item be taken off the Planning Commission agenda and that the file be closed for lack of interest. After that,. the City would follow through and enforce the zoning ordinance in. that Garfield. Truck Lines would be an illegal use in the C -M zone. Assuming we get your filing fee of $50.00 by July 5, 1978, the Planning Division staff will process a staff report to the Planning Commission for their considera- tion during -their July 27, 1978 meeting. This meeting.will.start at 8:00 p.m. and will be held.in the old Tukwila City Hall located at 14475 - 59th Avenue South. . Please get in contact with me at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, 11 Stoknes., Director 0 ice of Community Development KS /ch cc: L.G1r78-18 -CUP CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 22 June 1978 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM IV E CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Garfield Truck Lines) Environmental review on this proposal is not yet complete and, therefore, the public hearing must be delayed until such time as a negative declara- tion or EIS is prepared. If environmental review of this proposal is completed on time for the July 13th special meeting (recommended), staff recommends that the public hearing be held at the 13 July 1978 special meeting. PARKS 3 RECPE;110:4 6 June 1978 • CITY ©f TUKW LA OFFICE or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ms. Josephine Frandsen Garfield Transfer Co. 1938 Occidental Ave.. So. Seattle, Washington 98134 RE: Application for Conditional Use Permit, Environmental Checklist pear .Ms. Frandsen: This letter is a follow -up to Mr. Crutchfield's letter of 31 May 1978. Please be advised that any decision on the Garfield. Truck Lines con - ditional use permit application cannot be made until sufficient environmental information has been submitted. I am enclosing a copy of Mr. Crutchfield's letter of 8 May 1978 which identifies the needed information. Also, this office requires a $50.00 fee to accompany the environmental questionnaire to cover costs of review. This fee has not yet been submitted. Please advise this office of your intentions as we are continuing to carry this item on the Planning Commission's agenda from month to month. Res ctfuily, Satterstrom Planning Supervisor FNS /ch cc: OCD Dir Enclosure. 6230 Southcentec Boulevard c' Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (206) 2.42 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ECEIVE MA, 5 197e This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the g4PrigtAMQVILA permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: GARFIELD TRANSFER CO., INC. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 193$ OCCIDENTAL AVE SOUTH, SEATTLE, 575 3023 3. Date Checklist Submitted: MAY 4, 1978 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: NSA; 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezon ,conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YESX NO X (b) King Coun y y aulics Permit YES NO (c) Building permit YES x (d) Puget Sound Air__. Pollution Control Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO X (f) Sign permit YES NO X (g) Water hook up permit YES NO X (h) Storm water system permit YES NO X (1) Curb cut permit YES NO X (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO X (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO X (1) Other: 10. _Do you have any plans-for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by__ your proposal? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro -_. posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NONE II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X • • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) .Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -.3- YES MAYBE NO X X X • • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) ,Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- ' tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: '9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation:. 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X 11. Population. Explanation: • • Wi1T the proposal alter the location,;. distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, : - - or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a)-- -Generation of additional vehicular movement? - (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? -(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? -6- YES MAYBE NO X X X (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X' (b) Communications systems ?. X (c) Water? X (d) X ) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. PRESIDENT MAY 4., 1978 Signature and Title Date APPLICATION FOR. CHANGE OF LAW USE CLASS Iv.ODIFICATION OF L4ND USE REIGULATIONS IN THE C FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Form B £tFJYE MAY 51978 CITY OF TUKWILA Appl. No. Planning Carm_ission Action Receipt No. Filing Date Hearing Date City Council. Action Ordinance No. & Date APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: Name GARFIELD TRANSFER CO.,INC. Address 1938 OCCIDENTAL AVE SOUTH, SEATTLE Telephone No. 575 3 023 Property Petitioned for°nditiona1Sloce on 1040 ANDOVER PARK W. beta MINKLER and 1100 BLOCK ON ANDOVER PARK W Total square footage in property 230,749 sq. feet LP L DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY COPY ATTACHED. - FOUGHLY, A PARCEL OF 5..50$ ACRES MORE OR LESS LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ANDOVER PARK WEST AND MINKLER BLVE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON. ALL AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY. CERT. .NO. 7504020357 DATED APRIL 2, 1975, AS FILED WITH THE SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Existing Zoning Zoning requested NO CHANGE Mat are the uses you propose to develop on this property? ExISTING USES Number of permanent off - street parking spaces that will be provided on property? 135 Number required 126 NOTICE TO, APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to suisnit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. -(See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimum requirements.) 1. What provisions will be made to screen adjacent 'and surrounding property from any incarpat -ible effects which may arise as a result of the proposal land use classification? NONE APPEAR TO BE NECESSARY 2. V-nat provisions will be made to provide for necessary street widening to City minimum standards? NONE REQUIRED 3. tivhat provisions will be made for adequate sewer and v,ater service? ALREADY PROVIDED FOR. 4. Any oLh r carrnents which the petitioner feels are r.Ipprop.ri.ate: PETITIONERS ACTIVITIES ARE OF THE SAME NATURE, BUT NOT AS INTENSE AS I ED PARCEL SERVICE, LINCOLN MOVING & STORAGE AND OTHER COMPANIES LOCATED NEAR BY. Exhibit "A" PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, RIBED AS FOLLOWS: NNTNG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 2'32" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF ORIGIN OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL, WHICH CHANNEL CONTINUES SOUTH 88 °12'32" EAST TO [NUS AT THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF CHRISTENSEN ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 7'28" WEST 21.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF LER BOULEVARD WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF ANDOVER PARK WEST, AS :RDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6355529, VOLUME 5095, PAGES 63 AND 64,' !ROS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; !CE CONTINUING SOUTH 01 047'28" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 667.58 THENCE SOUTH 88°12'31" EAST 346.49 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE HAVING A RADIUS OF 300.16 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 7'17" WEST, THRU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17 °15'15 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF .9 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 °47'28" EAST 578.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY IN OF MINKLER BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTH 88 °12'32" WEST 360.00 FEET TO TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.