The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-61 - AITON COMPANY - OFFICE BUILDINGAITON OFFICE BUILDING 53RDAVS& SOUTHCENTER BLVD EPIGFD -61 k CI, of Tukwila 0 W • 1908, Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development 8 April 1980 Tom Aiton 3837 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Renton, WA. 98055 Re: Office Building, 53rd.Avenue at Southcenter Blvd. Regarding the subject development, please note that a comprehensive environmental assessment on this site was performed during an earlier phase of the total project concept and that a declaration of non- signifi- cance was issued on 30 June 1978 (EPIC-FD-61). All requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act have been satisfied. TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mark Caughey Acting Director MC /mkb Enclosure CITY OF TUKWILA 'OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -PROPOEOEBVFINAL DECLARATIOi1 OF Tc_ rJrnr,irs/NON- SIGNIFICAi10E Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency Office Building Aiton Company 53rd & Southcenter Blvd. City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -61 This proposal has been determined to (1irzrve /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (TS'is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development Date 30 June 1978 Signature COMMENTS: Ala EdID. Bauch, Mayor CITY of ` U ZM1' - WIL 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 26 June 1978 Aiton Company 3837 Lake Washington Boulevard North Renton,. Washington 98055 RE: Your Office.Building Proposed in Tukwila Dear Sir: The PlanningCommission at their regular meeting of June 22, 1978, approved your development. plans for your office building in Tukwila per the plans submitted and dated June 19, 1978 with the following additional conditions: 1. Curb -cut of 24'- -width be established for the west parking area, such curb -cut to be located at least 20' from West property corner and at least 100' from edge . of eastern curb - cut; 2. Treatment of the north building elevation with stacked brick, same as other building elevations;, 3. Screening. of roof - mounted equipment. 4. Detailed-landscape plan review by Planning, Commission prior-to occupancy. 5". Dedicate easterly 5 feet t� the City for right -of -way prior to issuance of building permit. • 6. Agree to.improve 53rd Avenue South-to-City standards at'time of develop- ment of property adjacent to the north and have road improvements made prior .to occupancy on any structures on the land adjacent to the north. Please incorporate the above conditions into your site plan in conjunction with your building permit application. In addition to the above, the Planning Commission•latter discussed the subdivision code. After our discussion, it is my conclusion that your property must be subdi- vided now prior to issuance of any building permit by the City of Tukwila if there is presentlya structure on the property. The only way to avoid having to 'subdivide now is if the building is removed prior to issuance of the occupancy permit or if the demolision bond is submitted to the City of Tukwila guaranteeing its removal . within a specified period of time. Please call me on this item so we can clear it up as soon as possible. Very truly ‘oohs, K'jell Stoknes, Director Office of Community Development. KS /ch cc: Ait• Office Building Site Plan File C File Al Pieper 19 June 1978 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Aiton Company 3837 Lake Washington Boulevard North Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Your Office Building Proposed in Tukwila Dear Sir: During the afternoon of June 15, 1978, I personally reviewed the conditions we are recommending on your site plan in our report to the Planning Commis- sion. As you know, our report recommends that the item.be tabled until the items in the staff report are completed. During that afternoon, I stated that if you would change your site plan by June 21, 1978, to incorporate the requirements in the staff report, that I would. recommend that the Planning Commission approve your site plan the following date. If you are interested in taking this course of action, please have your site plan changed actually encompassing the items in the staff report and bring it into my office by June 21, 1978. It will be our recommendation that the above - referenced items in our staff report still be conditions of the building per- mit, however, there will be no need to table the matter if you concur. I'm not delineating the recommendations of the staff report in this letter, however, I am attaching a,copy of the staff report for your use. If you do not agree with some of the items in the staff report, you should be prepared to justify why you don't want to so the Planning Commission can best make their final decision on the matter. Very truly yours, -C))1L K ell Stoknes, Director Office of Community Development KS /ch Attachment: Agenda Item V G from the Planning Commission packet of June 22. 6230 Southcenter Boulevard 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 a (206) 242-2177 • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: ,4`T/l/ Q Le ,8% PROJECT ADDRESS: 315 ry A-OWL DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: CA.� f I 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: XFire: 6 -4— 7e by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 5/20, (reviewer) 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: ATTOtHHhew7S, CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONiME(NTAL OUESTION''rAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: 0 i n D9a 54ivoe V>s-17I DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: sp 1. DEPART)ENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) Building: 3/ / ' 7 j by: Ct� •4 ❑ Engineering: /�� by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: CITY OF TUKWILA 411 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: 5 /z0 DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 725-/7' 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) ❑ Building: Xngineering: J /zb/76- ❑ Fire: ❑ Planning: ❑ Police: (reviewer) by: by: y?4. �U by: by: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: / ,peeAu e e c .r �r� r oti' 7 // red 04 e..) see., 7.-.0 /4 GO'S - 01717 /s ewe/ /4 e7 / e /fQ 7i: /4) rep,/ reo/ 'T.v Co•v /v c�c Lt.) a� 4.e./..4..) 041/.c.7 e 4C-s// c;<_) a .v o/ Gpyy/r!' ex .J 74. ah Th /4- ✓Oa /� D ✓O mP.v7� ov /J Je Q 'e4ieW. 7,s /.407L 7 de CO d.J i! a4-e c As atfr vva / aff . .• 1/ / 9C� _ X i ./ .� v g et S �� S � -(.vim • �� 447;-/c./ rese ✓de /56-- r/ y. f 1114 KC_ ,.4- ma r// e GOA)/ O4 l / o.cJ GtJ/ GL /74a 't //u el CITY OF TUK4'WILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: r; ;r' . /t1 /� �,5 .�L f �� -r 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: /LC/ t /&', i l i; /-4 3. Date Checklist Submitted: ;5 /J1/7 17) 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 1 /61. /;OC' `�1 �L , ►a ✓ CF(= �'- rc.c J. CT 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of . the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): L a it.)/t r�'j Q1� / l h. .' ,5 `l ci _5c3, / /L/.> .� dd U 8. Estimated Date for - Completion of the Proposal: 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government.Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): .(a) Rezone,. conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. 'YES NO (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO (c) Building permit YES NO - (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit.. (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO YES2L NO YES., NO YES )( NO YES )'\ NOK YES �� NO YES .X NO YES Y' NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: li/` /L' ? 2 c r % l : > i, ,. L ? z �� %!' c ! G�c %C 1.4 L4 h, cu(LT ra X3%,�, 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may .affect • the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: /UO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: eX c va cci Litt_ G�tii jsi,“ Lei J/J '2 c . t ;'mot YES MAYBE NO 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? /75 (b) The creation of objectionable odors? P (c) •Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? // ;C' Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? 41-C' (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- X 1� (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: go To vt, 1 LL�,,.i� s h�`� .� 77 6, 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:. (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? I'Q /✓V (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. .Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: -4- 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO %G /4 Ai 1 YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing 'transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? /a, 4. Explanation: 61(41 /i % fin/ c; 'c 5 �?,�•. C� �� 5<<,:(- /4 • ,9.07-i-„, : L. L_ i2 11-1 C L.' �r ._: (� ��.: �. t L p i i (. 0 // Z 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c)' Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? -6- (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: - (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO AL') LCi 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? ✓� (b) Communications systems? ' Xi/; (c) Water? .1-'6 (d) Sewer or septic tanks? ` / D (e) Storm water drainage? /('C (f) Solid waste and disposal? LQ Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi -. cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title Date /4 r7 RECEIPT Received. From Address. 333 Z or d/A-4 ACCOUNT AMT. OF' • ACCOUNT AMT.,•PAID • BALANCE. 8X908 aa<i?inn ' HOVJ PAID CASH∎,``;' ` MONEY.'. B • sN ._� : ∎CaP 1.7011 F�f.Rh+:IJ � -•.1 1.- fSE�WF.,r:D . ` 0 u) N. %- m 0 w a - g°rerE:M:.1 AFL. or, tiE b - 6!" We r+r" 1<-fQ clL S PIPE 172P1 h(D I 1.4 BY GEJELogepl -JC,c,uRy I (` -B „-r P " 44-'(12.'. 041 piP6 S(R.[�'.t+1LS 2.g1 ...DAprGFCS Ft-,". PLOT' PLAN cc 4IE rri5 E 2Cx: 00 FT . "P;,.70y.,VALE vAaJ:•E .1 TRAL -TS, ACLOR,C .10 16% FLATS. R,gGOR,i:ED 114 VGL4IME 10 GO PLAT-5,', PAC.* 411. n-1" IVNG Co t1f1T ( �nt: EYCa'r THE. $GJT? • .: 'It: Fr. GF- r•■c'. 'w'E5T' :75 Fr. "'HE7.BCF';' ATi Q. Eilc. - r' r:AT .'Criss' . - 101..1' .'CP.e.,.F' L- 11X4'. ✓ -ED. ,45' F�r:::C�+h'- ,�[l:f :ti:1G -A'r ":r'r I�l'fF.3," °�:.i 't: cF. r.e- i ltEF.:_ ?" 1..1..,�'::�; C -P1a @. F-•�f :: r'Jh- T1±P:EE .T 4. FG I?- lT'COt_1.:TY �P.O:..0 .'v.!!rH A= :LII..E .. 3419*. F!=:G 1'-'. EAS` cP A. PA R,i+.- '.c:.. wr'.. t.l&:WaSr.EO1:ktoke4Y'.'OF 7146- :.5xv�l /4�oC ..: `'E.. C-,iloN .9L,. TDw'u1- 4IF-%? Nc �.;'!: P -Afi6E ,a eA•r; W l.n. '41 C- 4C. c.O.. WA rr' -G' - AND `i: 4:;.E AL: or., FEET' !�1oc.e .o .� L':55 io CLI Tf7E UORT14 LIIJE OF S410 `1 T"3 5AI pu11r eFJ G: Tp1 E . pc,Nr. 4'E.51141IJf -+G OF MIS - 7r.-AC -T I4 . 1-1 . QE GP O, THE lC E. GOr411■.LJIur •400 PARALLEL r ;uE I °9.1� Fr '11GO E ov1 IX,S fo A. pclLT 114 .46. Fr. 5+04T1h OFT - 145 - MA15 4AL I-4.E CF S& -P.OAC l Ti ENG@. T .S I' SOD Fr• ,�:>- r,l�:.EASr �cruu�p:-r _�1.:e �F v��. Lor r, 1 rr1E1Jc-- I-J 1.1 ALONE 9-JC EAST. e7J4J P.Y- _1!.5 •4S r0 Tl.E Souf- 14LL --r Sao ?'E4frO1J- ,. TCrF lr • 77-EE POUT, G60•,TY gpA,D. Y °AID 'WAD M:z9-4-0I•: 11.4. PT- MCPrE' 444,4,.¶O.114e.,NjAf4EL'r,,1' wITN'-E' µ: R J11 / Pf aF Lor Gw667tRLY AU:1.14 5.41O I-14:95T1.1 U1.1E': • LO. T n, 182 T7. HARP• OR`LE'fi Tt 14E"TAL:E FYii.4r. OF. 7C ;f:1 :1 ".C•;..AJD. exrapr.114 T POii" ION. TF'JEF£CP CON'.RY'cJ TOTi16 coLla'-1 c? K.!NG..FOR exGErr 11:4.r poRrrow -oP e.of.ivlav�o-ro'TNESp.i 4ns."4,1•GTb41 FctP4 NIGNY.,..- • 4-IiRPG- e• .6Y GG£D- RELaR24 c2 uNCe.Tt. Ai1D 1T- ?x =1: F_ Vf., y,.4+ync£ - • SPA.--E9 GT`!- T'�Y;'rdI L:A.:, ?5 • - _ ' 'G'P,/.n.. AGsc re W,VJr. 44.1, ?ooF DP.Ad w;"A:: E.: d'iron 14tG :. V�;o••,1�5 f 1 r'. 1T Ti ch La1E 51ne vJALR, . y;: AVE . °'Otlirl, FRtiOfl EAKeMefJT- P:ots:O o 1. SoJrN ' pp;oFT-( L 4 - .. AJE:J _ ?Ar.: -,ING y w"i+.•': L TO TO �iJ.r -1 Gf.Y.1i' CL -rC1't @�,/KIr.1 Si,•IS ttltti�. :.1r14Ui W. 11M6tON