Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-67 - VILLAGE INN PANCAKE - RESTAURANTVILLAGE INN PANCAKE HOUSE EPIC -FD -67 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EH /FINAL DECLARATION OF '6 /i'JON—S I GII I F I CA dCE Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency Restaurant Construction Village Inn Pancake House, Inc. Westside of Southcenter Parkway North of Carriage House City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -67 This proposal has been determined to ( mJ not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (.ileftis not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes, Position /Title Director, Office of Community Developme t Date 5 October 1978 Signature COMMENTS: A.c4 CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5 October 1978 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director FROM: poger Blaylock, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VILLAGE INN PANCAKE HOUSE /ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE I have reviewed the Environmental Questionnaire for VillageeInn Pancake House proposed for the site just north of the Carriage House on the west side of Southcenter Parkway. The Benaroya Company has applied for a Binding Site Plan approval, which will be discussed before the Short Plat Committee tomorrow. I recommend that a Negative Declaration be issued. RJB /ch 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177 • CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of C OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 28 September 1978 MEMORANDUM TO: FILE FROM: Roger J. Blayloc �, SUBJECT: VILLAGE INN [�' Mr. Darryl Starman of Village Inn in Denver called wanting to know if it was necessary for their representative to be here on Thursday night. I responded no if the Village Inn was represented by their local con- tractor and Mr. Robert Fehnel or Mr. Benaroya. I read the staff report to Mr. Starman. He offered no comments. RJB /ch 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177 11/L,/// 19J� - 6 7- •ILDING PERMIT APPLICATIOO �'�``� e /�� / JA -1,01,144 /�r� TI REVIEW FORA (For PLAI1/441/431K3G. Cch tl l S S tc*- J PURPOSE: To serve as a transmittal letter.and form that other city departments can use to make comments on and .state requirements on new building per- mit applications. The following applicant has applied for a building permit through the City of Tuk- wila. Please review them for compliance with the laws and ordinances under your jurisdiction and make needed comments on this form. APPLICANT: VILLAGE Ii .,s Pkk.,ic.* c 1-1c, US� t�c.. LOCATION: 1r7 30S SO u11t.Ct' j)i L PA -2K.y0 l4� DEPARTMENT SENT TO: F 2E DATE SENT: 9= AO --)1g Re uirements necessary for compliance with laws and ordinancesunderyour jurisdiction: 'E NI lest IS - if) `S`O'N'C- EQ2.NED, out. - 1 J 11 W R LI 1 wg), LX'[�t" tt1O2 ANU Fr2M h cross .. Fuafl mot pF1tEw clP piARrS perakialm tir 0.11- Zkle2. FIJEC f 1704olQel- %o f t 1+A-bt✓: j rr A FiD E DftT: (Feel free to attach extra sheets if necessary.) / COMMENTS: &cots s qs Sh0wh q py c q�� ea (, q� e - or el This e- ObCLr »ih_, t t hi/ 4-4) QX7Ler-jaz- Review and comments made by: Title of reviewer: F' Ai / Date: q Date received back by Building Official: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE MEf020 1978 - BUILDING DEPT. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the city of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other forms have been developed for single- family home applications and legislation proposals. BACKGROUND DATA: 1. Name of applicant: t _ .c- n h 'ra'ke 2. Address and phone of Applicant: Ye u Wes- - 3. Project name: Z4"S • 4. Project location:- s, .e, ..s•-y(( weal ��s�aA Col-ermile 5. Nature and brief description of proposal: prof ese TA..... (1 c2- its 6. Estimated completion date: 0A4vtL IS I etl 9 7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: IYo, a.' What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this project? (a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES NO X ', /' YES NO (b) King County Hydr1 ics Permit (c) Building permit YES X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control. Permit YES NO X (e) Sewer hookup permit YES NO (f) Sign permit YES )C NO (g) Water hook up permit YES_ NO (h) Storm water system permit YES � NO (i) Curb cut permit E,A; sA\1 YES NO X (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES 'K NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES e< NO (1) Other 9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department - 11. Accepted by agency on: by: (to be filled in by city upon receipt of checklist) • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.) Yes Maybe Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in any changes in geologic sub- structures: (b) Disruptions, displacements or oe ercov*V F 'o Q� `, soils : (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or in changes in siltation; deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed. of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: . Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or in any change in climate, • either locally or regionally? Explanation: • Water. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? /(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the amount of surface water run- off? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? /(d) Change in the amount of surface �/ water in any watercourse? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sur- face.'water quality, including temperature or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an acquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seep - age of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) .Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Explanation: • Yes Maybe No X • Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro -flora and aquatic plants)? ©u. 044,4.' ►rwf (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a bar- rier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Explanation: o -w Fauna.. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including rep - tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic . organisms, insects, or micro - fauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? Explanation: Noise. Will the proposal increase exist- ing noise levels? Explanation: • Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation:;- v 1o4- L∎iik -Q t1 zLand Use. Will. the proposal result in the ./� alteration of the present or planned land. use of an area? Explanation: Natural Resources. Will the proposal re- sult in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat- ural resource? Explanation: wad Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: • Yes Maybe No }-lousing. Will the proposal affect existing housing availability, or create a demand for additional housing? X Explanation: Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c) Impact upon existing transportation Vt. systems? ) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne or air. traffic? . Explanation: • Al.! , ?J L t W � _\ Q.r wi,2 U2 �. i C �l .+A r Y►W . Local Services. Will the proposal have an .effect upon, or result in a need for new services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the follow- ing utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? d Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation;. Yes Maybe Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard•or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ex- isting recreational opportunities? Explanation: Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site? Explanation: Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi- cant.increase in city revenues? Explanation: Employment. Will the proposal create a significant amount of new jobs? Explanation: y Yes Maybe