Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-68 - 60-61 SOUTHCENTER ASSOCIATES - OFFICE BUILDINGSOUTHCENTER ASSOC OFFICE BLDG 6100 SOUTHCENTER BV EPIGFD -68 12 October 1978 • • E1'zc, cam, CITY of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M TO: Fred Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor FROM:7?./Roger Blaylock, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: SEPA REVIEW /SITE PLAN /OFFICE BUILDING /6100 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD I have reviewed the site plan and the SEPA checklist on the office building proposed by 60 -61 Southcenter Association on the northwest corner of the intersection of Southcenter Boulevard and 62nd Avenue and have found several major problems. First, the proposed site plan includes property which does not belong to the applicant. Parking is projected on property which belongs to the State of Washington. The State is processing the transfer of owner- ship of the property along Southcenter Boulevard to the City of Tukwila. The City in turn will lease the property to the developer. Second, a portion of the parking is accessed only by going through the base- ment parking of the first building. This is totally unacceptable because the buildings could be sold separately. Therefore, I would recommend that the application be returned until the property has been legally transferred then have the applicant reapply with a copy of the lease attached. This is necessary because a Threshold Deter- mination under SEPA must be made prior to October 19th by the City of Tukwila. RJB /ch 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2I77 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE EC9f CITY OF a U KWILA • 0 6,T 4 1918: BUILDING DEPT. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the city of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other forms have been developed for single- family home applications and legislation proposals. BACKGROUND DATA: 1. Name of applicant: 60 -6/ Sou771C JTER 4.s'.reC 2. Address and phone of Appl i cant: ;r A y'rept s / /e.f'yOLe. A az 7e9 of z 3. Project name: Off/e el" 4?c 4. Project location: 6 /o, so v7face-Airea Tic. ✓o . 5. Nature and brief description of proposal: CoNSr/2 vc T it/6 2 . r vit y Estimated completion date: Alf Y /929 7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: NU 8. What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this project? (a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES NO x (b) King County Hydr7olics Permit YES. NO >C (c) Building permit YES A NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO ?C (e) Sewer hook up permit YES ' NO (f) Sign permit YES X NO (g) Water hook up permit YES )C NO (h) Storm water system permit YES X- NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES )C NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YESX NO (1) Other AWAre a1AY F e u A-' s"016-NT 1 64tri wEA1 T AGQE 44e"T c 'i y of 7-v .ew,44 9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: N U 10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department - 11. Accepted by agency on: by: (to be filled in by city upon receipt of checklist) • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.) Yes • Maybe No Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in any changes in geologic sub- structures: (b) Disruptions, displacements •or overcovering of the soils: (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique • geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or • erosion of beach sands, or in changes in siltation, • deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of • the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation:. x Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or in any change in climate, • either locally or regionally? Explanation: • Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the amount of surface water run- off? %(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any watercourse? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sur- face.water quality, including temperature or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an acquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seep- age of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? (i) Explanation: •_•es Maybe • Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro-flora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a bar- rier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Explanation: • Fauna.. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, • or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including rep- tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic • organisms, insects, or micro-fauna)? • (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? • (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? Explanation: Noise. Will the proposal increase exist- ing noise levels? Explanation: Yes Maybe No • Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation:;' Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land. use of an area? Explanation: Natural Resources. Will the proposal re- sult in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat- ural resource? Explanation: of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or . upset conditions? Explanation: Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: -4- , Yes Maybe • Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing availability, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: Transportation /Circulation . Will the pro- posal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular. movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne or air traffic? Explanation: 1, or►siie par- Yes Maybe No 116e pro v..d ea/ Local Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: a) 6] e) US ✓aI services re cj v eo� 4,• a 1001 • Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the follow- ing utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: • Yes Maybe No • Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ex- isting recreational opportunities? Explanation: Archeological /Historical.. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site? Explanation: Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi- cant increase in city revenues? Explanation: TAXES bl v7ufT/ES Employment. Will the proposal create a significant amount of new jobs? . Explanation: OFF /CE Flivso.AvEc Yes Maybe No June 24, 1975 • CITY OF TUK4IILA • CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I hereby certify that the information furnished in this environmental checklist: sheet is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. t7,1 �i�� PaAt‘AA- Date Signature and Title Project Name: DPFICE- BcA . Project Address: 6600 So,TfVCe wTG72 01,0P. BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION BY OTHER'DEPARTMENTS: Check one 1. Date of Review: Building by: • Planning by: ( +) or ( -) Engineering by: ( +) or ( -) Police by: Fire by: (+) or (-) 2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: '.The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit More specific information is needed to determine impact. Signature and. Title .of Responsible Official Date 3. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by y Staff Person Letter, phone Date In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No 759. (-) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be'done. ( -). Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not be done.