The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-75 - PUGET SOUND MUTUAL BANK - COMMERCIAL BANK BUILDINGPUGET SOUND MUTUAL SAVINGS BANK EPIC -FD -75 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT V f Iii@le d/ F I N A L DECLARATION OF 6+6; f4C- f NON -S I GN I F I CA JCE Description of proposal Commercial Bank Building Proponent Puget Sound Mutual Bank Location of Proposal Northwest corner of Strander Blvd. & Andover Pk. W. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -75 This proposal has been determined to (hewn /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (4e/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Community Development Signature Ittototo0 Si p4 December 1978 g COMMENTS: *ALA Asti City of Tukwila • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1906 Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor 14 December 1978 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director FROM: Roger / Blaylock, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: SEPA REVIEW - PUGET SOUND MUTUAL BANK I have reviewed the Environmental Checklist for the Puget Sound Mutual Bank located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Strander Boulevard and Andover Park West. There will be minor changes in all areas of impact, except for traffic. No additional curb -cuts are proposed so the basic traffic pattern is not affected. However, volumes can be expected to increase. I antici- pate within the next 12 months that traffic lane and signal modifica- tions will be necessary on Strander Boulevard from the development of (1) the Doubletree Inn, (2) the Southcenter Office Building, (3) the Seattle City Light Property and (4) the Benaroya Office Building. There traffic revisions cannot be attributed to one single development. Therefore, I recommend that a Declaration of Non-Significance be signed. RB /ch CITY Of TUKWILA OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 19 September 1978 Mr. Thomas Zander Lance Mueller & Associates /Architects 130 Lakeside Suite F Seattle, Washington. 98122 RECILtVE0 SEP 2 0 1978 Lance Mueller & Asso RE: PUGET SOUND MUTUAL - SOUTHCENTER BRANCH Dear Mr. Zander: As per o,ur, conversation of Monday, September 18, 1978, it has been deter- mined that a site plan review for the Puget Sound Mutual Savings Southcenter Branch is not required. Review of the site plan and parking will be done at he time of application for a building permit. Since Southcenter will be leasing the property to Puget Sound Mutual, it will be necessary for you to submit a site plan of Southcenter including all parking layout and any areas that have joint use agreements for parking. I am returning the Environmental Checklist and the check to be resubmitted at the time of application for a building permit. I have kept the site plan for reference. If I can be of any further help please feel free to call me at our new number 433 -1848. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Assistant Planner RJB /ch Enclosures cc: Ping Sup Bldg Off 6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONM1NTAL CH`CKLIST FORM RECEIVED AUG 2 3 1978 Lance Mueller & Assoc. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for perrii tThi s' quest'i onnai re must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must.accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Ube/ <Di j4 %Uq' / ) 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: T� 1214 a a - �, - ge 7- 6-706 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 49r/ACen /e{' 8///'Jd 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal .(including but not limited --to_i.ts,_size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and- nature)::1'./ 24 j' /2nk4 47AL 79U �/ , 7�' /OrA% / 1 SAW coA ii/Ue bp c9/41/4o 1Ai re n, o/e Sao 1 /9 c2// 2A //I 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical.setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- . standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): . 11 Co i e 7 -i 4/4 4 /44 Si lQz .1 "2l /ec/ fir" /o/ w/4 Sore eits4 e /s4 /f7d T/n , /ie f2f/ c1 / 1249.237 or k/441, Si Ie n t? h22jn alneJ d n L e Le 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: dPh( 9.. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional uses shoreline permit, etc. YES 0 (b) King County'Hydraulics Permit YES NO _ (c) Building permit YES/N0 ` (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other; YES NO/ YES NO YES,/ NO YES/ NO / YES �/ NO / YES /.NO ✓ YES �// NO M1 YES ✓ NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: /W/ /On /Plr%vOle ki'lllo (r //iv/. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: — 12. Attach any -other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature ,off such application form: d ek k/ / S • cis //5 Z° <I /h Sec/- /on II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? " (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE 'NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bey, inlet or lake? Explanation: A 075 /"ey,ffe 4„ p0py / COndrve 40. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh ✓/ waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? v (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? �f (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either • through direct injection, or, through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail= able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a' barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) .Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: Jeal /one % het& &Acne. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an - area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? ( ) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife' habitat? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO E. Noise. Will the proposal. increase existing noise • levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: /201//1v1 Lan // /01/n/n0 /ioh 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b)• Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: norirla f d e //4 Use 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: -5 YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Explanation: • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of. an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation . or movement of people and /or goods? YES MAYBE NO Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: j.) dpin U, (c,i 4i ~. b) On 5x4: ,02d61 f� /nae25e 1142( /c 7C/ow - inv-e L 2 p214/7 d, on s/ile 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? < (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: j),) - norm l fire �l /6e pto lt'C 0l (or by) {2_c/ %{7. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b). Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the.-de.vel.opment of new sources of energy? Explanation� //n / -/ nor ma / / vl 1h 2d 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas ?. (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer —or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: J / �/ /901'474/ o/1///7 //7 • 017)1Pc1`/0✓1 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: -7- YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Expl ana'tiDn: 19.. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Ti ZSY16E Ae//eir Aw, / /7 /M Date