The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-77 - FIBERCHEM INC - EXPANSIONFIBERCHEVI EXPANSION EPIC -FD -77 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL DECLARATION OF /NON -S I GU I F I CA JCE Description of proposal Fiberchem Expansion Proponent Fiberchem, Inc. (Mr. Don Leuthold) Location of Proposal 1120 Andover Park East Lead Agency Planning Division /OCD File No. EPIC -FD -77 This proposal has been determined to 111111Wnot have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS Airs not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file wit the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date 29 January 1979 Kjell Stoknes Director, Office o Community Development COMMENTS: Signature 1909 • City f Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor 30 January 1979 Thomas A. Sconzo, Architect 13219 Northrup Way Bellevue, Washington 98005 Dear Mr. Sconzo: �,e yoUL6tic) A review has been made of the environmental checklist submitted by your office on behalf of Feberchem, Inc., regarding the proposed office /ware- house addition to=the existing building at 1120 Andover Park East. It has been determined that the proposal is environmentally non- signifi- cant; the Office of Community Development has issued a negative declara- tion in regard to the building addition, conditioned.upon the removal of one truck door. This provision..will allow a single, main truck door,. ensuring adequate space for.the maneuvering of automobiles on the.premises. If you have any questions about this matter, please call me.at 433 -1848. Sincerely, Roger Blaylock Assistant Planner RB /LS /ckh cc: Ping. Sup. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 29 January 1979 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kjell FROM: Romer E Linda SUBJECT: Fiberchem Addition /Environmental Questionnaire The environmental checklist submitted on behalf of the Fiberchem Company has been reviewed, and it has been determined that the proposed project will be environmentally non - significant. Our recommendation is that a negative declaration be made in regard to the Fiberchem building addition, conditioned upon the removal of one truck door, allowing only a single main truck door. This pro- vision will ensure adequate space for the maneuvering of automobiles. RJB /LS /ckh w • CITY OF TUKWILA rric- Fs- 7 '[ .cz3o11 p-7c4 % RECE CITY OF TUMApitA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM J,- U 0 9.157 JJ D pT. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 1 1csy..ru.>4n•\ 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 112o Pb.g,,14 E. --1-0 '7 S - 02-1 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist:- a0l`tlnl.c. -ael.T17 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: p6L,E 2cove .,∎, 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Eig.:Tsrsc. 4 o. p..4, 14. ( ccP E -CLcet -fig L4-C° jT W (ctt4.4 -r1 0P 1,.4 Foot v./44gAS,tii4.kVbS. VS E- _ 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well-as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): -x .141 ' tits.Tzit 1TlD t4 To d._ -'-1 STt I.l cm FlaE2ee�c nn. 15t L-p i.r 4= Apr ►t2o 0144 PK. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: ,tmpt2.11.,. , k o) - c) 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO k (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YESk NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO k (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO AC (f) Sign permit YES NO k (g) Water hook up permit YES NO A- (h) Storm water system permit. YES NO ,r (i) Curb cut permit YES NO k (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO l'- (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO ,r (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: gib 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: r1u 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: c.op. izo, --riot l of -m- a-CT v.►t►.t- CtG-QU (E.G. F!�E C�fz.Af�t 4 (o p.nlo •U nI.G (n)-7- 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: o'laE.c-noni.o.pti. -F oQoriLs awl V A '�".∎1 t ni V A nlP /o i, p •So M.t:-A C.. t K G GO nkS-r e. c-r- o,•-k. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- _nt cot, ►-t T 1ZE'1� vQ1P4G x • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? '(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: YES' MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: N01.,, ,_.tom► s v,►�� c3� „arf R-,.••,r►7-i- ( R4 4.0. ,›OVNIA44. cc. STR.UC.Tto4. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions ?. Explanation: 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? • (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES. MAYBE NO • (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities:. (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO THOMAS A. SCONZO 13219NORTHRUP WAY/ /BELLEVUE. WA .98005/206 84 T-2e I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information_is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. J tsv� �l ,CS1 "N Signature and Title \ Date